hilloway park analysis 26 november 2002 city of minnetonka parks renewal project the kestrel design...
TRANSCRIPT
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
City of Minnetonka Parks Renewal Project
The Kestrel Design Group, Inc.5136 Hankerson Ave. Suite 1Minneapolis, MN 55436Ph. 952 928-9600 Fax 952 [email protected]
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS
Sustainable DesignAquatic & Terrestrial Restoration
Ecological Stormwater ManagementNatural Areas Management
Soil BioengineeringLandscape Architecture
Introduction
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Introduction
WHO ARE WE?
The Kestrel Design Group, Inc - An Environmental Design, Planning and Consulting Firm
WHY ARE WE HERE?
To get feedback from the users and neighbors of Hilloway Park about your concerns, interests and desires for the Park
WHAT IS GOING TO BE DONE?
Based on the response from the citizens and the city of Minnetonka a plan will be created to address the “improvement” of Hilloway Park
Introduction
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Context
Neighborhood Park Context
• Three parks within 1 mile of Hilloway Park (Meadow, Mayflower and Big Willow)
• Designated trail connections to nearby Big Willow Park and Meadow Park - other natural areas based parks
• Nearby Mayflower Park currently provides playground equipment and other recreational activities
MAYFLOWER PARK
1 Mile
Introduction
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
United States Public Land Survey
The United States Government required that a Public Land Survey be completed before public sale of lands in the western territory. The survey notes provide valuable information about plant communities before European settlement. This survey is based on a subdivision of the land into six-mile square townships each divided into 36 sections of one square mile. Information surveyors recorded along each of the section lines at the time of the General Land Office Survey includes:
Land Development History
• Witness trees: species and size of 4 trees at each section corner
• Other trees along the section line• Points where the section line intersects with
surface water (eg. lakes, marshes, springs, streams, rivers)
• Points where the section line intersects a change in landuse, vegetation, or a settler’s claim
• A summary of the topography, soils, vegetation, and undergrowth along each section line
.-,494
.-,394
#
T117 R22 S2T117 R22 S2
T117 R22 S12T117 R22 S12T117 R22 S11T117 R22 S11T117 R22 S10T117 R22 S10
T117 R22 S14T117 R22 S14
(/169
N
1000 0 1000 Feet
Presettlement Vegetation
Big Woods - Hardwoods
Lakes (open water)
Oak Openings and Barrens
Wet Prairie
Section Boundary
.-,494
.-,394
#
T117 R22 S2T117 R22 S2
T117 R22 S12T117 R22 S12T117 R22 S11T117 R22 S11T117 R22 S10T117 R22 S10
T117 R22 S14T117 R22 S14
(/169
N
1000 0 1000 Feet
Presettlement Vegetation
Big Woods - Hardwoods
Lakes (open water)
Oak Openings and Barrens
Wet Prairie
Section Boundary
-This portion of Minnesota was survey in 1854
Historical Assessment
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Land Development History
Summary of PLS Notes:
Section was surveyed on November 11-20, 1854 By Hiram Fellows, Deputy Surveyor
Section line summaries around section 11•Timber oak openings•Undergrowth oak and aspen, oak and hazel Witness Trees•Primarily Red Oak and White Oaks, 5 to 10 inch diameter, with a few aspens, 8 inches in diameter
11
Tim
ber
Oak
Ope
ning
s.
Und
ergr
owth
Oak
+ H
azle
.
Timber Oak Openings. Undergrowth Oak + Hazle.
Tim
ber
Oak
O
peni
ngs.
U
nder
grow
th O
ak
and
Haz
le.
Timber Oak Openings. Undergrowth Oak and Hazle.
01 mile 80 chains
Graphic Representation of Public Land Survey Notes for T117NR22W 5th P.M. Section 11
Surveyor intersected road
KEYSurveyor intersected Oak Opening
Surveyor intersected Marsh
Section Number
Section Line (1 section = 80 chains = 1 mile)
20 Chain (= 1320') Grid
5 Chain (= 330') Grid
XX
M
31 32 33
19
30
18
6
7
20
29
17
21
28
16
5
8
4
9
34 35 36
22
27
15
23
26
14
3
10
2
11
25
24
13
1
12
31 32 33 34 35 36
Sources:1. Map based on public land survey notes by Hiram Fellows November 1854.2. Text above section lines represents surveyor's notes along section line.3. Text under section lines represents surveyor's summary of soil, topography and plant community at section line.4. Heavy colored lines along section lines represent vegetation recorded by surveyor along section line.5. See report text for township general description.
11
Tim
ber
Oak
Ope
ning
s.
Und
ergr
owth
Oak
+ H
azle
.
Timber Oak Openings. Undergrowth Oak + Hazle.
Tim
ber
Oak
O
peni
ngs.
U
nder
grow
th O
ak
and
Haz
le.
Timber Oak Openings. Undergrowth Oak and Hazle.
01 mile 80 chains
Graphic Representation of Public Land Survey Notes for T117NR22W 5th P.M. Section 11
Surveyor intersected road
KEYSurveyor intersected Oak Opening
Surveyor intersected Marsh
Section Number
Section Line (1 section = 80 chains = 1 mile)
20 Chain (= 1320') Grid
5 Chain (= 330') Grid
XX
M
31 32 33
19
30
18
6
7
20
29
17
21
28
16
5
8
4
9
34 35 36
22
27
15
23
26
14
3
10
2
11
25
24
13
1
12
31 32 33 34 35 36
Sources:1. Map based on public land survey notes by Hiram Fellows November 1854.2. Text above section lines represents surveyor's notes along section line.3. Text under section lines represents surveyor's summary of soil, topography and plant community at section line.4. Heavy colored lines along section lines represent vegetation recorded by surveyor along section line.5. See report text for township general description.
Historical Assessment
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
• Entire section is a mosaic of agriculture, forest, and wetlands
• Land of present day Hilloway Park has been cleared for cultivation and grazing
• No forests exist on the site
• Plymouth Road is the only road in the section
Land Development HistoryHistoric Aerial Photo: 1946
Present DayHilloway Park Boundary
Historical Assessment
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
• Cultivated land has become fallow/pasture
• Growth of shrubs and woodlands
• Additional roads have developed, including Hilloway Road
wetlands
Hilloway Road
Historic Aerial Photo: 1953
Land Development History
• Pine plantations planted in the early 1950’s Present Day
Hilloway Park Boundary
Historical Assessment
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
• Growth of shrubs and trees around wet areas
• Pine trees becoming dominate in the landscape
• Large fallow field in the southern 1/3 of park
Pine plantings
Fallow field
Present DayHilloway Park Boundary
Historic Aerial Photo: 1962
Land Development History
Historical Assessment
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
• Pine plantings have grown into dense stands
• Pine stands starting to fill in between themselves as they mature
• Growth of shrubs and deciduous tress at center of park
• Suburban development accelerates
• Site in a fallow condition; pre-invasion of exotic species
Pine plantings
SuccessionalShrubs and trees
Historic Aerial Photo: 1971
CurrentHilloway Park Boundary
Land Development History
Historical Assessment
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
• Successional pattern of landcover
• After a century of being intensively maintained by humans, the land is now passively use and maintained
• What if any thing needs to be done?
• What is next? - What is desired? What is fitting or appropriate?
Review of Land Development History• Vegetation has undergone a dramatic change over
the last 150 years:
Presettlement - Oak Barrens and Openings
Settlement - agriculture
Agriculture Abandonment - fallow grassland
Current condition - planted and pioneering forest
1946
1962
1971
Historical Assessment
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Current Land Cover
MLCCS
Code
Description Acres
21112 Upland soils with planted, maintained, or cultivated White Pine trees
5.43
21113 Upland soils with planted, maintained, or cultivated Red Pine trees
1.87
21114 Upland soils with planted, maintained, or cultivated Jack Pine trees
2.37
32110 Oak forest 0.94
32160 Aspen forest 2.47
32170 Boxelder/Green Ash disturbed native forest 0.49
32300 Saturated deciduous forest 0.16
42130 Disturbed deciduous woodland 10.66
61220 Medium/tall grass non-native dominated grassland
0.77
61320 Wet meadow – temporarily flooded soils 0.14
61480 Saturated non-native dominated graminoid vegetation
0.30
61820 Mixed emergent marsh – permanently flooded
2.02
93000 Open water wetland (palustrine) 0.66
Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS)- November 2002
Natural Resources Inventory
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
HydrologyNWI WETLANDSPEMC - [P] Palustrine, [EM] Emergent, [C] Seasonally Flooded• Entire watershed is contained within Hilloway Park• Improperly classified - it is not seasonal rather it is most likely
semi-permanently or permanently flooded
PEMB - [P] Palustrine, [EM] Emergent, [B] Saturated• Large marsh with very little open water - bog like• Some stands of high quality emergent vegetation (sedges)
with a large cattail colony• Although this wetland does receive stormwater from the
surrounding community the volume appears to be low, subsequently the negative associated impacts of stormwater should be minimal
• Current open water surrounding perimeter may have been dredged.
OTHER POTENTIAL WETLANDS• Additional semipermanant or ephemeral wetlands may
exist in four separate locations (A-D) within Hilloway Pk. The potential seems likely with general observation but a delineation would be required to determine wetland status
• The outlet from potential wetland C, which was recently installed appears to have been positioned too low, artificially draining the wetland
• All or the majority of the potential wetland watersheds’ are located within Hilloway Park. This allows for high restoration potential
Surface Watershed Delineation
Potential wetland (not identified by the NWI)
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) identified wetland
N
100 0 100 Feet
Surface Watershed Delineation
Potential wetland (not identified by the NWI)
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) identified wetland
N
100 0 100 Feet
30” Stormsewer
24” Stormsewer
24” Stormsewer
PEMC
PEMB
A
B
C
D
Natural Resources Inventory
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Geomorphology
Hennepin County Soil SurveyNessel loammarshKingsley complexHeyder sandy loamHeyder complexHayden loamHamel loamGrays very f ine sandy loamErin clay loamBurnsville sandy loam
Hilloway Park
Hennepin County Soil SurveyNessel loammarshKingsley complexHeyder sandy loamHeyder complexHayden loamHamel loamGrays very f ine sandy loamErin clay loamBurnsville sandy loam
Hilloway Park
Hennepin County Soil SurveyNessel loammarshKingsley complexHeyder sandy loamHeyder complexHayden loamHamel loamGrays very f ine sandy loamErin clay loamBurnsville sandy loam
Hilloway Park
Hennepin County Soil SurveyNessel loammarshKingsley complexHeyder sandy loamHeyder complexHayden loamHamel loamGrays very f ine sandy loamErin clay loamBurnsville sandy loam
Hilloway Park
Soils Information
Geomorphic Association: Superior Lobe
Glacial phase, ice margin association or age:
St. Croix
General Topographic Expression:
Hummocky. Includes areas of highly variable relief relative to adjacent topography. Typically supraglacial complexes, esker complexes and end moraines (kame-kettle topo).
Sedimentary Association / Rock Type:
Supraglacial Drift Complex
Additional Information or Qualifiers:
Mantled by a veneer of younger drift
Natural Resources Inventory
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Sense of Place
The diverse plant communities and dramatic topography of Hilloway Park create many unique spatial experiences. These unique places provide prospect and refuge for the users of the park. While some of these spaces are desirable, others are a result of a dramatic invasion of exotic species.
N
100 0 100 FeetN
100 0 100 Feet
A
B
C
DE
F
Perception
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Sense of Place Con’t
A - “Northern Pine Plantation”• Northern Minnesota feeling• High sense of enclosure provided
by tightly planted coniferous trees
B - “Early Successional Hardwood Forest”
• High sense of enclosure provided by a mixture of invasive shrubs and pioneering trees
• Extremely dense understory with open pockets of grass
C - “Exotic Shrub Enclosure”• Extremely dense understory
(invasive and pioneering species)• Relative dramatic elevation change
Perception
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Sense of Place Con’t
D - “Open Meadow”• Open meadow with encroaching
shrub edge• Sense of enclosure provide by
encroaching plant communities and rolling topography
E - “Emergent Wetland”• Non-habitatable human space• Allows for long uninterrupted
views• Bog-like wetland
F - “Primary Trail Corridor”• Maintained recreational corridor• Divides and separates the park• Most actively used portion of the
park• Dense enclosure formed by adjacent
invasive species
Perception
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Management Issues
Invasive Species• Entire park is over-run by invasive species • Common and Glossy Buckthorn are the biggest threat; others
include Garlic Mustard, Honeysuckle, Prickly Ash, Sumac and Cattail
• Choking out desirable species• Large portions of Hilloway Park are nearly consumed with
invasive species due to the “open door” of the fallow agriculture
Viability of Pine Stands• The White, Red and Jack Pine plantings are outside of their
native range but are a unique local feature which may be maintained
• Stands are a monoculture of the same age class - need to be diversified
• Growth and health of the pines have subsided in the last couple of decades due to light competition - thinning may be beneficial
• White Pines are naturally regenerating from seed but due to the deer predation they are not allowed to mature
• White Pine Blister apparent in the park and surrounding community
• Duff and downed logs are necessary for germination• Understory and groundlayer is consumed by Common and
Glossy Buckthorn
Synthesis
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Management Issues Con’t
Park Abuse• Dumping ground for yard waste• Unleashed dogs and pet waste• Damage to vegetation by youth
Vegetation is in an “early successional state”• Landscape is in “repair” mode after it was cleared and then left
fallow - very slow process (would normally take centuries but with the exotic invasion will take longer)
• The lack of a climax plant community makes the landscape more vulnerable to invasive species
• No local seed source for native climax species• Low wildlife value
Trail Fragmentation• Park has been fragmented into an exhaustive amount of trails• Caused by deer and humans• No hierarchy, confusing• Creates an excessive amount of edge condition (destructive to
valuable plants and animals)
Deer Population• Park is over populated with deer• Causing damage to the desirable plant species (of course the
desirable plant species are the yummy ones)
Synthesis
HILLOWAY PARK ANALYSIS26 November 2002
Synthesis - Opportunities and ConstraintsConstraints• Cost of managing invasive species stronghold• Limited access• Cost and controversy of managing deer herd• Concerns over prescribed burns (necessary
management tool)
Opportunities• Hilloway Park is “set up” for the unique
opportunity to represent all the major plant communities of Minnesota
• Introduction/extension of more passive park elements (seating, trails, interpretive signage, etc.)
• Greater connectivity to Minnetonka Park System
• Attraction of more watchable wildlife• Improved safety of the park landscape
Pine
Hardwoods
Prairie
Pine
Hardwoods
Prairie
Synthesis