hima and eme tellenbosch kim jenkins sat seminar australian delegation 6 th september 2011 6 th...
TRANSCRIPT
Principle of HiMA
• A building block in providing Perpetual Pavement = Long lasting road = Revêtements durables = Duurzame verhardingen
• M Thomson (2004) Perpetual? “It’s a hell of a long time”
.Perpetual Pavements
Under ESALUnder ESAL
Limit Bending to < 65(Monismith, Von Quintus, Nunn,Thompson)
Limit Bending to < 65(Monismith, Von Quintus, Nunn,Thompson)
Limit Vertical Compression to < 200(Monismith, Nunn)Limit Vertical Compression to < 200(Monismith, Nunn)
Thick HMA(> 8”)
Base (as required)Base (as required)
Subgrade
Perpetual pavements: is there a strain limit below which there is no fatigue???
Log N
Log ε60με?Endurance limit
Lower layer:Fatigue, higher bitumen contentSufficiently low strain level
No
fat
igu
e?
EME: Enrobe a Module Eleve
• EME has the following specific properties:– Increased stiffness– Increased resistance against fatigue– Increased resistance against permanent
deformation
• EME is used in base layers
Applications EME
• Special heavy loaded lanes• Bridge decks• Industry areas• Airport pavements• Perpetual pavements
• Important: check the low temperature cracking
EME
• The properties are achieved by:– Hard bitumen: special production process,
special crudes (no polymers added)– Higher bitumen content– Optimised grain distribution– Low voids content
• Mix design according French norm NF P 98-140
Sabita HiMA T2 project
Phase IVDrafting of guidelines and specs
Phase IIIValidation through APT,LTPP and lab study
Phase IIPreliminary mix and structural design guidelines
Phase IFeasibility study
CSIR
Flexural stiffness (Bending test) EU
RM 0/20 C RM 0/14 C
Complex Modulus At 10 Hz [MPa]
Complex Modulus at 10 HZ [MPa]
Temperature
-10 C0 C
10 C15 C20 C30 C40 C
5
228002100017200150001280088004500
3.9
280002310017200141001110059002600
Comparison of HMA Moduli
© CSIR 2006 www.csir.co.za
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0.00001 0.001 0.1 10 1000 100000
Dy
na
mic
Mo
du
lus
(M
Pa
)
Reduced frequency (Hz)
BTB Mix
Coarse/SBS
Medium/SBS
HiMA
CSIR
© CSIR 2006 www.csir.co.za
Permanent deformation (RSST-CH)
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
0 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000
Perm
anen
t str
ain
[%]
Load repetitions
BTB 1 55°C Coarse AE2 55°C Medium AE2 55°CHiMA 55°C Medium 60/70 55°C BRASO 55°C
CSIR
Fatigue results (10 °C 25 Hz)
10
100
1000
10000
1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000 100000000
ST
RA
IN (M
icro
str
ain
)
Number of load cycles
Strain-fatigue relationship at test temperatures at 70% initial stiffness reduction
Mix 1 (BTB)
Mix 3
Mix 4 (HiMA)
All at 10 Degrees C
CSIR
© CSIR 2006 www.csir.co.za
French mix design – to SAParameter Requirement Result SA equivalent test
Workability(Gyratory compactor)
Max 6% voids after 100 gyrations
5.7 % Gyratory
Durability(Duriez test)
Retained strength: >0.7
0.9 Modified Lottmann
Rutting(Wheel tracker)
Rut depth after 30 000 cycles <7.5 mm
5.2 mm RSST-CH, Wheel tracking
Beam dynamic modulus
15 °C-10 Hz:>14 GPa
17 GPa Beam or cylinder dynamic modulus
Fatigue(Prism)
με for 106 fatigue life: >130
90 με Beam fatigue
CSIR
Gyratory study
Specification Superpave FrenchGyratory angle 1.25 0.82Pressure 600kPa 600kPaRate 30 gyrations/min 30 gyrations/min
CSIR
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Air v
oids
[%]
Number of gyrations
F Sample1F Sample2F Sample3F sample4F sample5S Sample1S sample2S sample3S Sample4S Sample5French
SUPERPAVE
CSIR
0.82°
1.25°
Guideline
Select components
Formulate design grading
Select binder content
Compact gyratory specimens
Workability criteria met?
Durability criteria met?
Dynamic modulus criteria met?
Compact slab
Rut resistance criteria met?
Fatigue criteria met?
Implement!
YesNo
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
CSIR
Changes after the surveys
• Based on the survey the following changes were made for construction:– Temperatures: paver out temperature
>140 ºC .Compaction completed before the temperature falls below 120 ºC
– Air voids < 6%, air voids 100 mm from any unsupported edge < 8%
Binder propertiesTest
Ref
20/30Modified
20/30
(2011)
10/20
(2011)15/25 Spec
Penetration (10-1mm) 25 29 23 22 15-25
Softening Point (oC) 62.8 64.4 57.2 62.2 55-71
Viscosity @ 60oC (Pa.s) 2713 1318 832 2375 >550
RTFOT:
Softening Point (oC) 69.2 68.2 61.6 67.6≥ Orig.
(Min +2)
(Retained Penetration
(10-1mm))
% of Original
(19)
69
(20)
69
(18)
78
(16)
72.7 ≥ 55
© CSIR 2006 www.csir.co.za
Property Test Method Performance requirements
HiMA base
course
HiMA binder course
Class 1 Class 2 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
Workability Gyratory
compactor, air
voids after 100
gyrations
ASTM
D6926
≤ 6.3% ≤ 3.8 % 3.2 to 6.3 % for D = 10,
2.5 to 5.7 % for D = 14
Moisture
sensitivity
Modified
Lottman
ASTM
D4867
Refer
Table
10
Refer
Table
10
Refer
Table
10
Refer
Table
10
Refer
Table
10
Permanent
deformation
RSST-CH,
55°C, 30 000
reps
AASHTO
320
≤ 1.7%
strain
≤ 1.7%
strain
≤ 2.3%
strain
≤ 1.7%
strain
≤ 1.1%
strain
Dynamic
modulus
Dynamic
modulus test at
10 Hz, 15°C
AASHTO
TP 62
≥ 14
GPa
≥ 14
GPa
≥ 9 GPa ≥ 14
GPa
≥ 14
GPa
Fatigue Beam fatigue
test at 10 Hz,
10°C, to 70%
stiffness
reduction
AASHTO
T 321
≥ 330
με for
10 E6
reps
≥ 430
με for
10 E6
reps
≥ 360
με for
10 E6
reps
≥ 330
με for
10 E6
reps
≥ 330
με for
10 E6
reps
Conclusions
• HiMA is recognised as having potential for application in SA
• EU tests adapted for SA• Special grade of binder needed• Mix design procedure & guide in place• APT and LTPP still required• Field adaptations in SA still needed
Way forward in SA
• Validate improved mix design,• Perform APT and LTPP,• Finalize mix design and structural design
guidelines