HIT – Heparin induced thrombocytopenia: new …HIT – Heparin induced thrombocytopenia: new mechanisms & novel therapies Asher Winder M.D. Director, Department of Hematology Wolfson
89
HIT – Heparin induced thrombocytopenia: new mechanisms & novel therapies Asher Winder M.D. Director, Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
The Paradox
Heparin
Thrombocytopenia
Heparin + Thrombocytopenia
Thrombosis
Bleeding
Bleeding
HIT
bull Is it important
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
bull Venous or arterial thromboemboli
bull Without prompt and effective treatment the likely outcome is ndash Death in 20 to 30 ndash Limb amputation in 10 to 20 ndash Residual deficits in survivors related to strokes
myocardial infarctions and pulmonary emboli
bull Ptrsquos without a thrombus on presentation (isolated HIT) have a risk of 50 for developing one
bull Is it prevalent
For patients receiving porcine UFH in therapeutic doses either by IV or subcutaneous (SC) for the treatment of venous or arterial thrombosis the risk of HIT has been estimated at approximately
1
Warkentin TE Greinacher A eds Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia 3rd ed 2004107-148 Marcel Dekker New York NY
bull What is HIT ndash Definitin ndash Subtypes ndash Pathophysiology ndash Clinical picture
bull When to suspect bull How to diagnose bull What to do
ndash Immediate management bull Before diagnosis bull After diagnosis
ndash Long term management bull Can heparin be used again bull Preventable disorder
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
bull HIT
(heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) bull HAT
(heparin-associated thrombocytopenia)
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
The Paradox
Heparin
Thrombocytopenia
Heparin + Thrombocytopenia
Thrombosis
Bleeding
Bleeding
HIT
bull Is it important
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
bull Venous or arterial thromboemboli
bull Without prompt and effective treatment the likely outcome is ndash Death in 20 to 30 ndash Limb amputation in 10 to 20 ndash Residual deficits in survivors related to strokes
myocardial infarctions and pulmonary emboli
bull Ptrsquos without a thrombus on presentation (isolated HIT) have a risk of 50 for developing one
bull Is it prevalent
For patients receiving porcine UFH in therapeutic doses either by IV or subcutaneous (SC) for the treatment of venous or arterial thrombosis the risk of HIT has been estimated at approximately
1
Warkentin TE Greinacher A eds Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia 3rd ed 2004107-148 Marcel Dekker New York NY
bull What is HIT ndash Definitin ndash Subtypes ndash Pathophysiology ndash Clinical picture
bull When to suspect bull How to diagnose bull What to do
ndash Immediate management bull Before diagnosis bull After diagnosis
ndash Long term management bull Can heparin be used again bull Preventable disorder
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
bull HIT
(heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) bull HAT
(heparin-associated thrombocytopenia)
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
bull Is it important
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
bull Venous or arterial thromboemboli
bull Without prompt and effective treatment the likely outcome is ndash Death in 20 to 30 ndash Limb amputation in 10 to 20 ndash Residual deficits in survivors related to strokes
myocardial infarctions and pulmonary emboli
bull Ptrsquos without a thrombus on presentation (isolated HIT) have a risk of 50 for developing one
bull Is it prevalent
For patients receiving porcine UFH in therapeutic doses either by IV or subcutaneous (SC) for the treatment of venous or arterial thrombosis the risk of HIT has been estimated at approximately
1
Warkentin TE Greinacher A eds Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia 3rd ed 2004107-148 Marcel Dekker New York NY
bull What is HIT ndash Definitin ndash Subtypes ndash Pathophysiology ndash Clinical picture
bull When to suspect bull How to diagnose bull What to do
ndash Immediate management bull Before diagnosis bull After diagnosis
ndash Long term management bull Can heparin be used again bull Preventable disorder
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
bull HIT
(heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) bull HAT
(heparin-associated thrombocytopenia)
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
bull Venous or arterial thromboemboli
bull Without prompt and effective treatment the likely outcome is ndash Death in 20 to 30 ndash Limb amputation in 10 to 20 ndash Residual deficits in survivors related to strokes
myocardial infarctions and pulmonary emboli
bull Ptrsquos without a thrombus on presentation (isolated HIT) have a risk of 50 for developing one
bull Is it prevalent
For patients receiving porcine UFH in therapeutic doses either by IV or subcutaneous (SC) for the treatment of venous or arterial thrombosis the risk of HIT has been estimated at approximately
1
Warkentin TE Greinacher A eds Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia 3rd ed 2004107-148 Marcel Dekker New York NY
bull What is HIT ndash Definitin ndash Subtypes ndash Pathophysiology ndash Clinical picture
bull When to suspect bull How to diagnose bull What to do
ndash Immediate management bull Before diagnosis bull After diagnosis
ndash Long term management bull Can heparin be used again bull Preventable disorder
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
bull HIT
(heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) bull HAT
(heparin-associated thrombocytopenia)
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
bull Is it prevalent
For patients receiving porcine UFH in therapeutic doses either by IV or subcutaneous (SC) for the treatment of venous or arterial thrombosis the risk of HIT has been estimated at approximately
1
Warkentin TE Greinacher A eds Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia 3rd ed 2004107-148 Marcel Dekker New York NY
bull What is HIT ndash Definitin ndash Subtypes ndash Pathophysiology ndash Clinical picture
bull When to suspect bull How to diagnose bull What to do
ndash Immediate management bull Before diagnosis bull After diagnosis
ndash Long term management bull Can heparin be used again bull Preventable disorder
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
bull HIT
(heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) bull HAT
(heparin-associated thrombocytopenia)
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
For patients receiving porcine UFH in therapeutic doses either by IV or subcutaneous (SC) for the treatment of venous or arterial thrombosis the risk of HIT has been estimated at approximately
1
Warkentin TE Greinacher A eds Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia 3rd ed 2004107-148 Marcel Dekker New York NY
bull What is HIT ndash Definitin ndash Subtypes ndash Pathophysiology ndash Clinical picture
bull When to suspect bull How to diagnose bull What to do
ndash Immediate management bull Before diagnosis bull After diagnosis
ndash Long term management bull Can heparin be used again bull Preventable disorder
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
bull HIT
(heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) bull HAT
(heparin-associated thrombocytopenia)
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
bull What is HIT ndash Definitin ndash Subtypes ndash Pathophysiology ndash Clinical picture
bull When to suspect bull How to diagnose bull What to do
ndash Immediate management bull Before diagnosis bull After diagnosis
ndash Long term management bull Can heparin be used again bull Preventable disorder
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
bull HIT
(heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) bull HAT
(heparin-associated thrombocytopenia)
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
bull HIT
(heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) bull HAT
(heparin-associated thrombocytopenia)
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
HAT Syndrome
Non-immune heparin associated thrombocytopenia (HIT Type I)
bull Associated with an early (within 4 days) and usually mild decrease in platelet count (rarely lt100 x 109L)
bull Typically recovers within 3 days despite continued use of heparin
bull Nonimmunologic mechanisms (mild direct platelet activation by heparin)
bull Not associated with any major clinical sequelae bull Occurs primarily with high dose iv heparin
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
HIT (type II)
bull Transient prothrombotic disorder
bull Initiated by heparin
bull Thrombocytopenia caused by antibody-mediated platelet activation
bull Clinicopathological disorder
bull arterial and venous thrombi
bull Potential for development of life-threatening thromboembolic complications
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Whom to blame
Heparin and PF4
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Heparin is a purified preparation of glycosaminoglycans (ie long chains of highly charged sugars) that are isolated from beef lung or pork intestine Unlike most other drugs heparin is a complex mixture of a large number of related compounds with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to gt 40000 13Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a member of the CXC chemokine13subfamily that is synthesized exclusively in megakaryocytes and13stored in platelet -granules1 PF4 accounts for approximately 213to 3 of the total protein found in circulating platelets on a molar13basis When platelets are activated PF4 is released in concentrations13that exceed 2 M (12 gmL serum) in the vicinity of13vessel wall injury2 The conservation of high levels of PF413expression in the -granules of every mammalian species examined13suggests that this protein has important biologic activities13However unlike other CXC chemokines which have a clear role in13inflammation primarily by augmenting neutrophil chemotaxis and13activation the biologic role of PF4 is unclear13Moreover whereas other members of the CXC subfamily bind13to specific members of the CXCR family of 7 transmembrane G13proteinndashcoupled receptors3 there had been no well-recognized13chemokine receptor for PF4 Binding of PF4 to the chemokine13receptor Duffy functions in chemokine clearance and it has13recently been proposed that some vascular beds in humans express13an alternatively spliced form of CXCR3 termed CXCR3B that13binds PF44 However the biologic importance of this interaction in13vivo has not been explored13PF4 is known to bind with high affinity to heparin and13heparin-like side chains of proteoglycans on membrane surfaces5-713PF4 exists as a tetramer at the molar concentrations found at sites of13injury Formation of the tetramer generates an equatorial band of13cationic charges8 which accounts for its strong avidity for these13large negatively charged molecules Upon its release from activated13platelets PF4 binds to proteoglycans on the surfaces of13endothelial cells9 platelet membranes10 and hepatocytes1113PF4 was first identified in the 1970s Since that time as a result13of in vitro studies PF4 has been implicated in diverse biologic13processes including proposed roles in megakaryopoiesis1213 angiogenesis131415 tumor metastasis16 immune responses17-20 and thrombosis132122 However these effects were only seen at high PF413concentrations (5-25 gmL or 02-08 M) Although these13concentrations can be achieved at the site of intense platelet13activation23 it is unclear which if any of these in vitro observations13have biologic relevance13For example it is still unclear whether PF4 has a role in13thrombosis as both prothrombotic and antithrombotic effects have13been described in vitro Because PF4 neutralizes negatively13charged molecules such as heparin and proteoglycans it had been13proposed that PF4 might prevent activation of antithrombin III13(ATIII) allowing thrombus extension24 Since then numerous in13vitro and pharmacologic infusion studies in animal models have13pointed to interactions between PF4 and other members of the13coagulation system resulting in both prothrombotic and antithrombotic13outcomes For example PF4 has been reported to inhibit the13activation of factor XII (FXII) a plasma proenzyme that when13activated by negatively charged agents such as glass ellagic acid13or kaolin initiates clotting via the intrinsic pathway of thrombin13formation25 The inhibition of FXII by PF4 can be neutralized by13heparin26 More recently PF4 has been reported to inhibit thrombin13activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in vitro in a single13preliminary report27 which would be expected to promote thrombus13development on the surface of endothelial cells PF4 can bind13directly to negatively charged regions within protein C and13thrombomodulin and thereby greatly enhance the activation of13protein C2829 Again both effects were inhibited by heparin In vivo13infusion of PF4 in primate models supports the ability of PF4 to13stimulate protein C activity3013The diverse conclusions drawn from these in vitro studies13clearly delineate the need to define the role of PF4 in hemostasis in13vivo Using both a knock-out mouse for PF4 (mPF4) and a13transgenic mouse that overexpresses human PF4 (hPF4)31 we13have begun to define the role of PF4 in thrombosis In this study we13show that PF4 is required to optimize clot formation Moreover our13studies show that PF4 promotes hemostasis only over a narrow13molar range and that negatively charged molecules such as13unfractionated high-molecular-weight heparin and positively13charged molecules such as protamine sulfate can alter the effect of13local PF4 release Specifically we show that the presence of high13concentrations of PF4 dissociates between the effect of heparin on13local thrombus formation and its effect on systemic coagulation13The implications of this finding for the pathogenesis and management13of human thrombotic disorders characterized by intense13platelet activation is discussed13
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
The PF4heparin antigenic complex bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α
granules and released upon platelet activation bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through
electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
A Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively B Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
normal resting platelet platelet incubated with HIT serum
microparticles
Hughes M Blood 200096188-194
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin Resting platelets or platelets incubated with HIT serum and heparin and processed for scanning electron microscope are shown Left A the morphology of a representative normal resting platelet Resting platelets were generally observed to maintain a discoid form Middle B the morphology of a representative platelet incubated with HIT serum These platelets demonstrated several morphologic changes including the absence of a discoid form the presence of pseudopodia and the presence of microparticles near the ends of pseudopodia (indicated by arrows) Right C microparticles that are clearly distinct and separate from the platelet body localize near the terminal end of a pseudopod (indicated by arrow) From Hughes et al62 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Kelton JG Chest 20051279S-20S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 7 A schematic representation of steps that occur during platelet activation in a patient with HIT In the first step (top left) PF4 is released from platelet -granules and rebinds to the platelets with or without heparin (top middle and top right) It is likely that the release of PF4 from the -granules requires partial platelet activation HIT-IgG binds to conformationally changed PF4 (bottom left) and these immune complexes bind to the platelet FcR on the same adjacent platelets (bottom middle) The occupancy of the FcR by the IgG immune complexes initiates platelet activation and the release of platelet-derived microparticles (bottom right)13
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Several mechanisms contribute to thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Platelet factor 4ndashheparinndashIgG complexes bind to the Fc receptor IIA on platelets leading to platelet aggregation acceleration of soluble clotting reactions (such as the conversion of factor II [prothrombin] to factor IIa [thrombin]) and activation of neighboring endothelial cells IgG antibodies bind to heparinndashplatelet factor 4 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells leading to additional endothelial-cell activation Endothelial-cell activation may in turn lead to focal changes in the expression of endothelial-derived procoagulants and anticoagulants Finally platelet microparticles which may be increased in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have increased procoagulant activity1313
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial bull in vivo platelet activation with formation of
procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles
caused by occupancy and cross-linking of platelet Fc receptors by formation of PF4heparinIgG immune complexes
bull expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells that have become activated because HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to endothelial heparan sulfate
bull expression of tissue factor by monocytes activated by HIT antibodies (HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA)
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
HIT - Pathogenesis
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fig 1 Pathogenesis of HIT a central role for thrombin generation PF4heparin complexes that can express multiple neoepitope sites bind to platelet surfaces HIT-IgG antibodies recognize neoepitope sites on PF4 leading to formation of multimolecular PF4heparinIgG complexes on the platelet surface The IgG Fc regions bind and crosslink the platelet Fc IIa receptors resulting in platelet activation including formation of procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles which provide altered membrane surfaces that support coagulation reactions Activated platelets release additional PF4 from -granules leading to a vicious cycle of progressive platelet and coagulation activation PF4 also can bind to endothelial heparan sulphate leading to endothelial cell immunoinjury with tissue factor expression Monocytes also can bind PF4heparin-IgG immune complexes potentially leading to tissue factor expression on these cells Ultimately there results marked thrombin generation in vivo which helps explain the strong association between HIT and thrombotic events Figure adapted from Greinacher A amp Warkentin TE (2001) Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia an Overview In Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia 2nd edn (ed by TE Warkentin amp A Greinacher) Marcel Dekker New York used by permission 1313
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
HIT-IgG remain not well understood bull Why not against heparan sulfate bull Rapidity (5 days) in the production of IgG
antibody bull Short persistence of antibody in patients
with HIT
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
bull PF4 binds to bacteria and thereby exposes the epitope recognized by anti-PF4heparin antibodies which enhance phagocytosis of bacteria
bull Normal individuals have anti-PF4heparin antibodies in their plasma likely induced by minor bacterial inflammation such as periodontal disease
bull Under normal conditions the pathologic-activating capacities of these antibodies are likely quenched by scavengers but when the capacity of these proposed scavengers is overloaded for example after major surgery and treatment with heparin strong activation of platelets monocytes and endothelial cells result in a prothrombotic situation
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I Blood 2012120931-2
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Greinacher A Krauel K Jensch I
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Spontaneous HIT bull Not associated with
antecedent heparin exposure
bull Considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4 heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) complexes
Theodore E Warkentin et al Blood 20141233651-3654
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant)
Presenter
Presentation Notes
(A) Clinical course (B) Thrombotic occlusion at internal carotid artery terminus (C) Flow reestablished to MCA (D) Reocclusion at origin of MCA (note the unusual problem of 5 rapid rethromboses may have been related to heparin administration during the mechanical thrombectomies) (E) Flow reestablished to MCA and anterior cerebral artery (after infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator) No heparin exposure occurred as a result of the platelet transfusions (platelets were prepared using citrate anticoagulant) APTT activated partial thromboplastin time ASA acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) IU international units IV intravenous SC subcutaneous t-PA tissue plasminogen activator U units UFH unfractionated heparin13
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
bull Skin necrosis bull Acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bull DIC
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Clinical course of patients
Girolami B Blood 15 April 2003 101(8)2955-2959
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Clinical course of the 5 patients who developed HIT DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis and AMI acute myocardial infarction 13The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin a prospective cohort study13Blood 15 April 2003 Vol 101 No 8 pp 2955-2959 13Bruno Girolami Paolo Prandoni Piero M Stefani Cinzia Tanduo Paola Sabbion Petra Eichler Roberto Ramon Giovannella Baggio Fabrizio Fabris and Antonio Girolami From the Division of Internal Medicine Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Padua Italy and Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald Germany 13
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Rapid-onset HIT
bull A large platelet count fall attributable to HIT antibodies within 24 h of starting heparin
bull Is not caused by an anamnestic immune response
bull Results from the administration of heparin to a patient who has already circulating HIT antibodies that resulted from a recent heparin exposure
bull Exposure within the past 100 days (and especially
within the last month) is associated with the phenomenon of rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Profiles of HIT
67 30 rare
Patients received heparin within the past 100 days Previous exposure may have been minorunrecorded eg IV line flush
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Warkentin TENEJM 348(11)1067-1069March 13 2003
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A 5000-unit dose of unfractionated heparin was administered by subcutaneous injection shortly before the patient underwent gastric bypass surgery Neurologic symptoms and signs progressed over a five-day period beginning seven days after surgery Laboratory studies showed maximal disseminated intravascular coagulation about two weeks after surgery with the nadir fibrinogen level on day 14 and the nadir platelet count on day 16 PF4 denotes platelet factor 413
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Skin Necrosis
Warkentin TE Br J Haematol 199692494ndash497
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A clue to the diagnosis in these cases is either a decrease in the platelet count of 30 percent or more within the normal range or the presence of erythematous or necrotic skin lesions at sites of subcutaneous heparin injection13
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
bull The following can occur in patients sensitized to heparin within 5ndash30 minutes ndash Fever chills ndash Tachycardia hypertension ndash Flushing headache ndash Chest pain dyspnea ndash Nausea vomiting large-volume diarrhea ndash Transient global amnesia ndash Sudden ldquoanaphylactoidrdquo death
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
bull Occurs in 5-15 of patients bull More common in delayed-onset HIT bull Prolongation of PTT complicates
monitoring of thrombin inhibitors bull Cancer-associated DIC with thrombosis
strongly resembles HIT
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Year No of
M F Age (year Complications Mortality
Patients range or SD) n () n ()
1983 62 34 28 19-93 38 (610) 14 (230)
1986 169 97 72 2-94 38 (225) 20 (120)
1996 127 60 67 670 +- 114 99 (780) 26 (205)
1996 dagger 62 33 29 667 +- 123 32 (516) 13 (210)
Includes patients initially presenting with thrombosis daggerSubgroup of the 127 patients presenting with thrombosis From Laster J Cikrit D Walker N Silver D Surgery 1987102763-770 and Warkentin TE Kelton JG Am J Med 1996101502ndash507
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Laboratory Testing for HIT
bull Platelet activation assays exploits the ability of HIT antibodies to activate normal platelets ndash serotonin release assay (SRA) ndash Aggregometry ndash heparin induced platelet activation (HIPA) ndash Flow cytometry
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
Iceberg Model
HIT associated Thrombosis
Thrombocytopenia
Activation Assays
Antigen Assays
Warkentin TE et al 199475-127
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Conceptualization of the time course for HIT The first indication of the autoimmune disorder is detection of antibodies to PF4 by an immunologic method such as an ELISA Higher titer antibodies would be detected in a functional assay such as a serotonin release assay At the same time as the detection of the antibodies by functional methods patients may have a decrease in the platelet count and possibly thrombosis as well With prompt discontinuation of heparin and institution of alternative therapy additional thrombosis is prevented and the platelet count increases toward the normal range The functional assay then becomes negative whereas the more sensitive ELISA assay may remain positive for as long as 124 days Rx indicates treatment 1313
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
bull Heparin use and thrombocytopenia are common events in hospitalized patients the combination does not necessarily indicate HIT
bull Nonpathogenic PF4heparin-reactive antibodies are a relatively common occurrence
in patients who have received heparin within the past days or weeks
HIT sepsis or both
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 2 HIT sepsis or both This patient developed thrombocytopenia beginning on day 6 of UFH therapy reaching a nadir (31 x 109 cellsL) on day 8 together with clinical and microbiological evidence for sepsis (ie Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia) Laboratory testing results for HIT antibodies were strongly positive by SRA (90 release) and weakly positive by PF4-dependent EIA (absorbance 0709 U) Clinical evidence for HIT includes being symptomatic for DVT and PE However the recovery in platelet count during therapeutic-dose UFH treatment and the documented bacteremia are more consistent with thrombocytopenia secondary to sepsis rather than HIT Reprinted (with modifications) from Warkentin and Greinacher16 with permission sc = subcutaneous13
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
When Should HIT be Suspected
The four Trsquos
Lo GK Blood 2003102(suppl 1)535a
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Points (0 1 or 2 for each of 4 categories maximum possible score = 8)
2
1
0
Thrombocytopenia
gt 50 fall or platelet nadir 20-100 109l
30-50 fall or platelet nadir 10-19 109l
fall lt 30or platelet nadir lt 10 109l
Timingof platelet count fall or other sequelae
Clear onset between d 5-10 or less than 1 d (if heparin exposure within past 100 d)
Consistent with immunization but not clear (eg missing platelet counts) or onset of thrombocytopenia after d 10
Platelet count fall too early (without recent heparin exposure)
Thrombosis or other sequelae (eg skin lesions)
New thrombosis skin necrosis post heparin bolus acute systemic reaction
Progressive or recurrent thrombosis erythematous skin lesions suspected thrombosis not yet proven
None
Other cause for thrombocytopenia not evident
No other cause for platelet count fall is evident
Possible other cause is evident
Definite other cause is present
Pretest probability score 6-8 = High 4-5 = Intermediate 0-3 = Low
First day of immunizing heparin exposure considered d 0 the day the platelet count begins to fall is considered the day of onset of thrombocytopenia (it generally takes 1-3 d more until an arbitrary threshold that defines thrombocytopenia is passed
When should HIT be suspected
bull Platelet count falls by 50 +- a thrombotic event occurs between days 4 to 14 following initiation of heparin even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia have occurred
bull A proportional fall in platelet count of 50 is superior to an absolute threshold of 150 x 109L for the detection of HIT
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Choosing Wisely
bull Low probability 4ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000)
bull Intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for hit (014 ci 009-022) and (064 ci 040-082) respectively
bull The ldquochoosing wiselyrdquo campaign of the american society of hematology recommends against testing for hit in patients with a low pretest probability
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Blood 2015126597-603
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
bull UFHbovine lung gt porcine intestinal mucosa
bull UFH gt LMWH
bull Women gt men
bull Duration of Heparin ndash 5 days and more
bull Dose of Heparin High dose gt prophylaxis
bull Patient population Cardiac surgery other surgery trauma inflammation cancer infection
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Diagnostic and Initial Treatment
Algorithm
Arepally GM and Ortel TL N Engl J Med 2006 Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Treatment of Suspected HIT
bull Discontinue all heparin including ndash Heparin flushes ndash Heparin-coated pulmonary catheters ndash Heparinized dialysate and any other
medications or devices containing heparin bull Administer alternative anticoagulation bull Confirm diagnosis of HIT bull Monitor carefully for thrombosis bull Monitor platelet counts until recovery
Do not stop Heparin without administering alternative anticoagulation
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Treatment Paradoxes
bull Warfarin ndash increase risk of microvascular thrombosis
bull LMWH is contraindicated bull Prophylactic platelet transfusions ndash
relatively contraindicated bull Therapeutic doses of anticoagulant needed
even without thrombosis bull Re-exposure to heparin is possible after
antibodies have disappeared
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Warkentin TE 1Ann Int Med November 1997 | 127(9)804-812
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
Alving BM Blood 1 January 2003 Vol 101(1)31-37
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In some countries but no longer in the United States danaparoid (Organon Roseland NJ) a heparin-related substance has been used This glycosaminoglycan is primarily made from heparan sulfate dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate64 It is estimated that there is approximately 20 to 30 cross-reactivity of this heparinoid with HIT-IgG but in most patients6566 there are not major adverse effects However some patients will still have a reaction to the anticoagulant67 13lepirudin (a recombinant version of the protein hirudin) and argatroban (a small synthetic molecule) have been evaluated in several prospective studie13
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulant
Dosing (therapeutic range)
Pharmacokinetics (t12)
Agents approved for treatment of HIT
Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Bolus 2250 U infusion 400 Uh 4 h then 300 Uh 4 h then 200 Uh with monitoring by antifactor Xa levels (0middot5-0middot8 anti-Xa unitsml)
Renal metabolism (25 h [antifactor Xa activity] 2-4 h [antifactor IIa activity])
2 microgkgmin without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-3middot0 baseline)
Hepato-biliary excretion (40-50 min)
Investigational agents for treatment of HIT
Bivalirudin (Angiomax)
015-020 mgkgh without initial bolus (target aPTT range 1middot5-2middot5 x baseline)
Enzymic gt renal (25 min)
Fondaparinux (Arixtra)
Uncertain
Renal 17-20 h
bivalirudin bull A synthetic 20-amino acid peptide bull Appears to be promising as a treatment for HIT
based on case series bull Compared with lepirudin and argatroban
bivalirudin offers some significant pharmacologic advantages ndash short half-life ndash enzymic metabolism ndash low immunogenicity ndash minimal effect on INR prolongation
MoH Angiomax is indicated for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Fondaparinux
bull A synthetic pentasaccharide
bull No cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays
bull Limited clinical experience in HIT patients
bull Development of HIT antibodies in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin none in either group developed clinical HIT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that has been extensively studied for use in orthopedic and abdominal surgery prophylaxis and the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism11 Small studies1213 have demonstrated no cross-reactivity of fondaparinux with HIT antibodies by in vitro activation assays but there is limited clinical experience in HIT patients The development of HIT antibodies was observed in a small percentage of patients receiving fondaparinux for prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery equal to the rate of antibody formation in the group receiving enoxaparin but none of the patients in either group developed clinical HIT14 Given the low rate of de novo antibody formation and the apparent lack of cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies fondaparinux may represent a relatively safe alternate anticoagulant agent for use in patients with a history of HIT 13
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-5313
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
bull IV immunoglobulin preparations of the IgG class (IVIG) success reported in a few cases
bull Plasmapheresis anecdotal experience only
bull AspirinClopidogrilGpIIbIIIa inhibitors
Serial SRA and IgG-specific anti-PF4 heparin EIA test results in relation to 4 therapeutic plasma exchange sessions performed on 4 consecutive days (last therapeutic plasma exchange performed 2 days before cardiac surgery using heparin)
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-8
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Warkentin TE Sheppard JA Chu FV et al Blood 2015125195-81313Kapoor A13Crowther MA Gangji A Plasma exchange to13remove HIT antibodies dissociation between13enzyme-immunoassay and platelet activation test13reactivities 13Blood 2015125195-8
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Typical Course of a Patient with HIT Treated with Danaparoid Sodium
Days Adapted from Greinacher A Drost W Michels I et al Ann Haematol 19926440ndash42
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Treatment of isolated HIT
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT
bull Simple discontinuation of heparin might avoid subsequent thrombosis ndash not true
bull Substantial risk for symptomatic thrombosis
among patients with isolated HIT ndash Objectively confirmed thrombosis 23-52 ndash Thrombotic death rates 45
bull Systematic duplex ultrasonography showed a 50 frequency of subclinical DVT
Presenter
Presentation Notes
A large retrospective study by Wallis et al10 provided information as to whether early cessation of heparin (within 48 h of occurrence of HIT defined as the day the platelet count fell by 50 during heparin treatment) was associated with improved outcomes Overall these investigators found that HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 43 of 113 patients (381) Interestingly early cessation of heparin was not associated with a decreased thrombotic event rate compared with later heparin cessation (45 vs 34 p = 024)10 However since heparin cessation could have been prompted by attention drawn to HIT by a complicating thrombosis itself a more conservative estimate of the risk of thrombosis in isolated HIT in this study can be obtained by excluding from analysis the 22 patients who acquired thrombosis within 24 h of stopping heparin If the data are analyzed excluding these 22 patients then of the remaining 91 patients early heparin cessation was associated with a trend to higher thrombosis than late heparin cessation 11 of 33 patients (333) vs 10 of 58 patients (172) [p = 012]
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
bull therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation bull continuing alternative anticoagulant until
platelet count recoveres to a stable plateau bull adding a short course of warfarin (following
platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved
bull routine ultrasonography to identify silent venous thrombosis - could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The optimal management strategy for isolated HIT remains uncertain A retrospective study105 found that low-dose (prophylactic-dose) danaparoid was associated with a high failure rate when administered for isolated HIT (composite end point 53 by time-to-event analysis) Routine screening by ultrasonography for lower-limb DVT was not performed in this study and so whether low-dose danaparoid might still be appropriate for patients in whom lower-limb DVT has been ruled out is uncertain123 Second the recommended lepirudin regimen in these patients was associated with low risk of new thrombosis (27 and 21 respectively) in two large studies (meta-analysis of three prospective studies of 111 patients124 and postmarketing observational study of 612 patients113) with the composite end point being observed in 10 of 111 patients (90) in the prospective studies124 Although this lepirudin dosing regimen omits the initial lepirudin bolus and begins with a 33 lower initial infusion rate compared with the therapeutic regimen (01 instead of 015 mgkgh) it includes dose adjustments according to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thus effectively achieves therapeutic dosing within 24 h Third the argatroban trials used the same (therapeutic dose) regimen whether patients had thrombosis complicating HIT or isolated HIT for the latter group of patients argatroban (compared with historical controls) was associated with lower rate of thrombosis (81 vs 224 p lt 0001 and 58 vs 230 p lt 0001) and a lower frequency of the composite end point of new thrombosis all-cause mortality and limb amputation being reached (256 vs 388 p = 0014 and 280 vs 388 p = 004)114115 Major bleeding in these studies of DTIs for isolated HIT ranged from 31 to 53114115 to 59 to 144113124 of patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin respectively Finally as HIT is a hypercoagulability state associated with much greater levels of thrombin generation than in other high-risk settings for venous thrombosis (eg after orthopedic surgery)82 it is biologically plausible that prophylactic-dose anticoagulation may be relatively ineffective in HIT patients In individual situations factors that would mitigate against use of therapeutic-dose alternative anticoagulation include low confidence in the clinical diagnosis of HIT (especially prior to obtaining HIT antibody test results) evidence of impaired hemostasis on physical examination and very severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count lt 10 x 109L) In patients with strongly suspected isolated HIT or when the diagnosis is supported by serologic studies we recommend continuing the alternative anticoagulant until the platelet count has recovered to a stable plateau Whether adding a short course of warfarin anticoagulation (following platelet count recovery) provides additional protection against late HIT-associated thrombosis is unresolved The high frequency of subclinical DVT in this patient setting123 suggests that routine ultrasonography is appropriate in these patients since if silent venous thrombosis is identified it could influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy 13The study by Farner and colleagues105 also provided insights into dosing issues of patients with isolated thrombocytopenia Patients treated with danaparoid for isolated HIT suffered from a high thrombotic-event rate compared with patients received lepirudin However the danaparoid-treated patients generally received only prophylactic-dose therapy whereas APTT-adjusted dosing was performed in patients receiving lepirudin (ie therapeutic-dose therapy) Thus these data support the use of therapeutic-dose danaparoid (Table 3) in patients strongly suspected (or confirmed) to have isolated HIT or HIT complicated by thrombosis 13In summary in the absence of any prospective clinical trials comparing one antithrombotic agent with another for management of HIT selection of a particular anticoagulant agent should be based on patient-specific factors relevant drug pharmacology and pharmacokinetics jurisdictional availabilityapproval and prior physician experience and confidence in the use of any particular agent None of the agents used to treat HIT has an antidote and thus careful drug selection for the appropriate patient is a relevant issue 13
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Re-exposure of Heparin
bull Not enough data Therefore re-exposure to heparin is not generally advised But ndash No anamnestic immune response occurs in HIT ndash Among patients with rapid-onset HIT there is a strong
association with recent (lt 100 days) rather than
remote (gt 100 days) prior heparin exposure ndash When heparin has been accidentally or deliberately re-
administered when HIT antibodies were no longer present recurrence of HIT antibodies usually did not occur
bull Demonstrate that HIT antibodies are no longer detectable serologically before re-exposure
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Warkentin TE N Engl J Med 20013441286-1292
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT This graph was derived from the analysis of 144 patients with HIT Note the progressive change from a positive to a negative test result for HIT From Warkentin and Kelton34 with permission of the publisher and authors13
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Prevention of HIT
bull UFH derived from bovine lung is more likely to cause HIT and HIT antibody formation than UFH obtained from porcine gut
bull LMWH (enoxaparin) found a significantly reduced frequency of HIT in the patients receiving LMWH following hip replacement surgery (probably LMWH creates less ultra-large complexes (ULCs) with PF4)
Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-99
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The biological basis for a difference in immunogenicity between animal sources of heparin could relate to the greater polysaccharide chain length and degree of sulfation in bovine lung heparin which could facilitate immunogenicity by enhanced reactions with PF46 1313Khandelwal S Lee GM Hester CG et al Blood 20161281789-9913The antigenic complex in HIT binds to B cells via complement13and complement receptor 2 (CD21)
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Avoid-Heparin Initiative Institution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Blood 20161271954-9
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications 13a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada 13Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases 13The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) 13While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Early diagnosis of HIT Platelet counts - how often bull Diagnosis and early treatment of HIT to prevent
sequelae
bull Frequency of HIT among patients populations ndash Bovine UFH gt porcine UFH gt low molecular weight
heparin ndash Surgery gt medical gt pregnancy
bull Therapeutic-dose UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14
bull High risk (1-5) postoperative prophylaxis with UFH - at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
HIT ndash Take Home Message
bull An extreme prothrombotic diathesis bull Preventable bull Awareness bull A clinico-pathologic syndrome
Collaboration with lab is crucial for diagnosis and management of HIT
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
שמחפסח
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
Warkentin TE Chest 200512735S-45S
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Figure 3 Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies Top the SRA Washed platelets loaded with radiolabeled 14C-serotonin are incubated with patient serum and pharmacologic concentrations of heparin The presence of HIT-IgG antibodies can be detected by the measurement of serotonin release Bottom PF4heparin EIA The assay shown utilizes PF4 and heparin bound in optimal stoichiometric concentrations to detect HIT antibodies Alternatively PF4 can be bound to certain other polyanions such as polyvinyl sulfonate (not shown)13
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
HPF4 PaGIA test
Compared with ELISA reduced sensitivity better specificity Sensitivity and sensitivity are similar to functional assays
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
bull A low-molecular-weight heparinoid mixture of glucosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate chondroitin sulfate) with a low degree of sulfation
bull predominant anti-factor Xa activity
bull Favorable results in ~90 of patients
bull Half-life of anti-factor Xa activity is ~25 hours disadvantage for patients who need surgical procedures
bull Cross-reactivity with heparin-dependent antibody in vitro is 10 to 20
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Adapted from Chest 2004126311S-337S
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Anti Factor Xa Assay
bull Measures inhibition of activated factor X activity bull Useful for monitoring anticoagulants with primary
activity against factor Xa ndash UH ndash LMWH ndash Danaparoid
bull In use for LMWH activity in selected patients ndash Pregnant women ndash Renal failure ndash Children
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
platelet transfusions for HIT
bull petechiae and other mucocutaneous bleeding typical of thrombocytopenia are not clinical features of HIT despite severe thrombocytopenia
bull platelet transfusions relatively contraindicated for the prevention of bleeding in patients with acute HIT
bull if overt bleeding occurs platelet transfusions in the setting of possible or probable HIT may be appropriate
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
bull Institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855
to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Rice L Arch Intern Med 20041641961-1964
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
Asher Winder MD Director Department of Hematology Wolfson Medical Center
Presenter
Presentation Notes
40 minutes
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
bull clinical presentation bull new developments in the pathogenesis bull clinical diagnostic strategies for HIT bull emerging therapeutics in the management of HIT
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
bull iatrogenic complication of UFH or LMWH therapy bull caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and
heparin within 5 to 14 days of drug exposure bull In some sensitized patients high-titer anti-PF4heparin antibodies of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype bind FcγRIIA receptor bearing cells trigger cellular activation and elicit a profound hypercoagulable state
bull may result in arterial andor venous thrombosis
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
bull PF4 is a highly cationic protein stored in platelet α granules and released upon platelet activation
bull PF4 binds to the negatively charged heparin through electrostatic interactions leading to the generation of ultra-large complexes
bull Neo-epitopes are expressed on PF4heparin only when PF4 binds to heparins of chain length gt11 saccharides
bull heparin stabilizes the PF4 molecule in its tetrameric conformation and in the process linearizes itself allowing additional PF4 tetramers to join the growing complex and exposing neo-epitopes on PF4 recognized by HIT antibodies
bull Inhibition of tetramer formation using a monoclonal antibody to the PF4 monomer interferes with heparin and HIT antibody binding pointing the way to development of therapeutic targets
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultra-large complexes
Cai Z et al Nat Commun 201568277 Onwuemene O amp Arepally GM Hematology 20162016262-268
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cai Z Yarovoi SV Zhu Z et al Atomic description of the immune complex involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Nat Commun 201568277 1313Crystal structure of the PF4heparin complex and formation of ultralarge complexes (A) Overall structure of the PF4fondaparinux complex Fondaparinux makes contact with a single PF4 tetramer in the groove among the monomers on one side of the asymmetric tetramer Monomers A B C and D in one PF4 tetramer are colored in green cyan magenta and yellow respectively (B) Analysis of crystal lattice reveals a molecular pathway for the formation of antigenic complexes A fragment of heparin first binds within the groove of one PF4 tetramer (limon left) binding of the first PF4 tetramer imparts a local linearized structure on heparin which enhances the binding of a second tetramer (pale green middle) and progression of this process eventuates in the formation of ultralarge antigenic complexes (right) Reprinted from Cai et al5 with permission
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
PF4heparin immune response
bull innate immune mechanisms caused either by bacterial infection andor antigen-mediated complement activation may contribute significantly to the development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull a correlation of periodontal disease with anti-PF4heparin antibody reactivity bull interactions of PF4 with both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well
as to short chain polyphosphates released from platelets bull direct complement activation by PF4heparin complexes resulting in antigen
binding to complement receptor 2CD21 on B cells Because antigen binding to CD21 significantly enhances immunogenicity these studies implicate CD21-mediated binding of PF4heparin complexes as an initial step for subsequent antibody formation
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Mechanisms of thrombosis
bull HIT antibodies activate both platelets and monocytes primarily by FcγRIIA and confirm prior observations on the contribution of monocytes to tissue factor expression and thrombin generation
bull In addition to direct platelet FcγRIIA signaling by HIT antibodies monocyte-derived thrombin provides additional platelet signaling via cleavage of protease-activated receptor 110 Depletion of monocytes or inhibition of FcγRIIA signaling markedly impairs platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition in this experimental system thus providing an explanation for the intense thrombin generation seen in association with HIT
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody
Oluwatoyosi Onwuemene and Gowthami M Arepally Hematology 20162016262-268
copy2016 by American Society of Hematology
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Visualization of thrombus formation by a HIT-like monoclonal antibody Confocal microscopy images of fixed thrombi formed in human whole blood perfused with a control antibody (RTO) or a HIT-like antibody (KKO) and PF4 Platelet aggregates are shown in green fibrin fibers visualized by adding of Alexa 647-labeled fibrinogen are purple and white blood cells are shown in cyan (overlap of blue nuclear dye is Hoechst and green is calcein AM) The attachment points of fibrin to platelets are white because of the superposition of purple and green colors Reprinted from Tutweiler et al10 with permission
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Updates in HIT epidemiology
bull Anti-PF4heparin antibodies are rare in healthy individuals In 2 large surveys of healthy donors (n = 40297) and blood bank donors (n = 380011) anti- PF4heparin antibodies were detected in sim3 to 4 of patients using a low cutoff for antibody positivity (optical density [OD] gt04) and in 03 to 05 of healthy subjects using a higher cutoff for antibody positivity (OD gt1)
bull anti-PF4heparin autoantibodies may develop in the context of inflammation andor orthopedic surgery
bull surgical inflammation may provide sufficient inflammatory signals for triggering PF4heparin antibody formation in the absence of heparin
bull In this prospective study of sim2000 patients who were either treated with pharmacologic or mechanical compression seroconversion rates were high in patients receiving only mechanical prophylaxis sim15 in patients receiving dynamic compression vs 65 for static compressions
Bito S Miyata S Migita K et al Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery Blood 2016127(8)1036-1043
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Updates in disease presentation
bull The hallmark of HIT is the development of a mild to moderate absolute (50-70 times 109L) or relative thrombocytopenia (platelet count fall of gt30 to 50) which develops 5 to 14 days after heparin exposure and a median of 2 days after development of anti-PF4heparin antibodies1718 in heparin-naiumlve individuals
bull In patients with more proximate heparin exposure (lt100 days) thrombocytopenia can develop acutely within 24 hours due to the presence of circulating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull Thrombocytopenia as the only manifestation of HIT is termed ldquoisolatedrdquo HIT ldquoIsolatedrdquo HIT is considered a prothrombotic condition due to high rates of subsequent thrombosis (20 to 50)
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
clinical variants of HIT delayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
bull autoimmune features due to occurrence of antibodies that bind PF4 and heparin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
bull described in case reports andor series the incidence remains poorly defined bull Antibodies causing delayed-onset HIT are usually cross-reactive with PF4GAG
complexes found on cell surfaces and characteristically elicit heparin-independent platelet activation in functional assays
bull Spontaneous HIT is not associated with antecedent heparin exposure and is considered a true autoimmune manifestation caused by autoantibodies to PF4GAG complexes
bull All the reported cases to date are associated with findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in association with high-titer platelet activating anti-PF4heparin antibodies
bull As with delayed-onset HIT anti-PF4heparin antibodies bind to PF4GAGs on platelets and thus have the distinctive feature of heparin-independent platelet activation
bull Diagnostic criteria for spontaneous HIT have been proposed based on clinical findings of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis without prior heparin exposure
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Updates in diagnosis
bull a combination of clinical and laboratory criteria bull Clinical features rely on showing a temporal association of heparin therapy with
thrombocytopenia andor thrombosis and excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia
bull The 4Ts clinical scoring system is a valuable clinical prediction rule for patients suspected of HIT
bull In a recent meta-analysis low probability 4Ts score (0-3) was found to reliably exclude HIT in patients Low 4Ts scores were associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) (0998 95 confidence interval [CI] 0970-1000) intermediate (4-5) and high (gt6) scores had poor positive predictive values for HIT (014 CI 009-022) and (064 CI 040-082) respectively
bull 40 of patients evaluated by the 4Ts will have intermediate or high clinical scores that require additional laboratory testing to establish diagnosis
bull Based on these findings the ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo campaign of the American Society of Hematology recommends against testing for HIT in patients with a low pretest probability
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
bull In a prospective multicenter study 526 patients suspected of HIT were assessed with a 4Ts score a rapid particle assay (PF4H-PaGIA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) and managed based on the results of a 4Ts score and the rapid particle assay while awaiting the results of the SRA
bull Of the 321 patients with a low pretest score 6 of were SRA+ (19 of low score cohort)
bull Review of these 6 cases assigned to a ldquolow scorerdquo indicated that 2 patients were incorrectly scored and 4 cases were complex patients in whom concurrent causes of thrombocytopenia were present
bull clinicians should assign a ldquolow scorerdquo with certainty if there is uncertainty regarding the clinical criteria then patients should be assigned higher points to merit an intermediate level of suspicion
Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Reference Design N
Pretest probability of 4Ts Posttest probability of 4Ts (+ assayminus assay)
Low (0-3) Intermediate (4-5)
High (6-8) Low (0-3) Intermedi
ate (4-5) High (6-
8)
Nellen V Single center retrospective 1291 08 14 53 NR 650 950
Leroux D Multicenter prospective 380 21 11 47 11
006 42
04 83
26
Linkins LA
Multicenter prospective 526 19 7 37 150 420 880
EIA enzyme immunoassay NR not reported
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-97 Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-782
Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Nellen V ET al Haematologica 201297(1)89-9713Leroux D et al Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-78213Linkins LA et al Blood 2015126(5)597-603131313Nellen V Sulzer I Barizzi G Laumlmmle B Alberio L Rapid exclusion or confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia a single-center experience with 1291 patients Haematologica 201297(1)89-971313Leroux D Hezard N Lebreton A et al Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert(reg) HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Br J Haematol 2014166(5)774-7821313Linkins LA Bates SM Lee AY Heddle NM Wang G Warkentin TE Combination of 4Ts score and PF4H-PaGIA for diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prospective cohort study Blood 2015126(5)597-603
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
emerging therapies for HIT
bull The direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) argatroban and bivalirudin are US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HIT (argatroban) and use in HIT patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (bivalirudin) Use of either agent should be guided by the half-life of therapeutic agent and co-existing hepatic andor renal dysfunction For discussion of the safety and efficacy of parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants in the management of HIT the reader is referred to recent guidelines and reviews4042
bull DTI alternatives such as fondaparinux and emerging therapies such as the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are clinically appealing because they have
bull fondaparinux does not cross-react with HIT antibodies bull In a minority of patients fondaparinux has been reported to cause HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
bull Rivaroxaban use in HIT has been reported in a small number of case reports 1 case series51 and a multicenter single arm prospective study52 The latter prospective single arm study closed early due to poor enrollment52 but reported outcomes on 22 enrolled patients 12 of whom were diagnosed with HIT In this small cohort of HIT patients rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and effective with 910 thrombocytopenic patients achieving full platelet count recovery during therapy Although there were no newrecurrent thromboses or bleeding complications in patients diagnosed with HIT some complications were noted including the progression of a previously diagnosed catheter-associated thrombosis in 1 patient amputation being required for another patient with worsening ischemia and major bleeding occurring gt1 week after drug discontinuation in another patient In a case series by Sharifi et al 11 patients were initially treated with a parenteral DTI followed by rivaroxaban The authors reported no recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding complications in this cohort However a lack of study details and heterogenous treatment assignment limit conclusions from this study51 Other than the case series reported by Sharifi et al51 there are only case reports on the use of apixaban and dabigatran for HIT (Table 2)51dArr-53
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) Reference Study (N) HIT Dx DOAC Dose (mg) Other AC Outcomes
Ng HJ Case series (3) ELISA+ Rivaroxaban 15 twice daily rarr 20 daily
Transitioned to warfarin (1)
Platelet recovery no thrombosis
AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient Sharifi M et al Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-609
Linkins LA et al J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-1210 Ng HJ et al Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-207
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sharifi M Bay C Vajo Z Freeman W Sharifi M Schwartz F New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(4)607-6091313Linkins LA Warkentin TE Pai M et al Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study J Thromb Haemost 201614(6)1206-12101313Ng HJ Than H Teo EC First experiences with the use of rivaroxaban in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Thromb Res 2015135(1)205-2071313bull13AC anticoagulant BKA below-knee amputation DVT deep vein thrombosis DX diagnosis SVT supraventricular tachycardia VTE venous thromboembolism 1313bull13Retrospective case series with prospective determination of outcomes1313bull13daggerDeaths were not due to thrombosis but to the underlying disease states including cancer heart failure renal failure systemic sclerosis sepsis and end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1313bull13DaggerOne patient transitioned to fondaparinux due to elevated hepatic enzymes1313bull13sectRenal-adjusted dose in a dialysis-dependent patient1313
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Avoid-Heparin Initiative bull institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-
molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
bull a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada bull Rates of HIT were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and
postintervention (2007-2012) phases bull The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases
per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001)
bull While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny
Presenter
Presentation Notes
McGowan KE Makari J Damantouros A et al Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia impact of an avoid-heparin program Blood 20161271954-1959 13Looking back at 2016 a couple of papers related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are notable for reframing the way in which hematologists might approach this relatively common prothrombotic adverse drug reaction Dr Kelly E McGowan and colleagues1 reported the first study to show the success of a HIT prevention strategy This elegantly straightforward approach redirects our thinking toward the prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT The authors developed an institutionwide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications Most care providers were not aware that heparin was being replaced by LMWH and none were aware that this practice change was being studied The five- to 10-fold lower risk of HIT with LMWH as compared to UFH2 provided strong rationale for the study which was conducted at a single tertiary-care hospital in Toronto Canada The Avoid-Heparin Initiative was implemented in 2006 The authors reviewed consecutive cases (from 2003 to 2012) with suspected HIT defined as a clinical suspicion of HIT and a HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)1313Rates of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT (defined as clinically suspected HIT with a positive serotonin release assay [SRA] or a positive HIT ELISA and SRA not done and diagnosed and treated as HIT by the hospitalrsquos thromboembolism service and confirmed as HIT by independent adjudication) HIT with thrombosis and HIT-related expenditures were compared in the preintervention (2003-2005) and postintervention (2007-2012) phases The annual incidence of suspected cases of HIT decreased from 855 to 49 cases per 10000 admissions (relative risk reduction [RRR] 42 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT decreased from 107 to 22 per 10000 admissions (RRR 79 plt0001) The annual incidence of adjudicated cases of HIT with thrombosis decreased from 46 to 04 per 10000 admissions (RRR 907 plt0001) While the authors additionally reported a cost savings in HIT-related expenditures with implementation of their Avoid-Heparin Initiative this analysis did not account for the higher unit cost of LMWH compared with UFH3 and is thus subject to further scrutiny1313The recognition accurate diagnosis and treatment of HIT are resource intensive Furthermore thromboembolic complications are often diagnosed simultaneously with a HIT diagnosis or afterwards while on HIT-safe anticoagulation1 This work establishes the feasibility and success of a hospitalwide HIT-prevention strategy potentially generalizable to broader hospital settings13
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012
P lt 001 for each comparison
bullThe Avoid-Heparin Initiative resulted in a dramatic reduction in the burden of suspected HIT adjudicated HIT HITT and associated costs
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
The Paradox
Slide Number 3
An extreme prothrombotic diathesis
Slide Number 5
Slide Number 6
Slide Number 7
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
HAT Syndrome
HIT (type II)
Whom to blame
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 13
Scanning electron micrographs of resting platelets and platelets activated with HIT serum in the presence of heparin
Platelet activation in a patient with HIT
Mechanisms of Thrombosis
The mechanism of hypercoagulability state is multifactorial
HIT - Pathogenesis
HIT-IgG remain not well understood
HIT is a misdirected bacterial host defense
Spontaneous HIT
Clinical Picture
Thrombocytopenia
Clinical course of patients
Rapid-onset HIT
Profiles of HIT
Delayed-Onset Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) after Exposure to a Single Dose of Heparin
Thromboembolic Disorders Associated With HIT
Skin Necrosis
Acute Systemic Reactions Caused by IV Heparin Bolus
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation - DIC
Incidence of Complications and Mortality of HIT
Laboratory Testing for HIT
Iceberg Model
HIT - a clinicopathologic syndrome
When Should HIT be Suspected
When should HIT be suspected
Choosing Wisely
Factors influencing The Frequency of HIT
Patient Population and Frequency of HIT
Diagnostic and Initial TreatmentAlgorithm
Treatment of Suspected HIT
Treatment Paradoxes
Gangrene of lower-limb digits
Alternative Anticoagulants to Heparin
bivalirudin
Fondaparinux
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
adjunctive Treatments of HIT
Slide Number 50
Treatment of isolated HIT
Anticoagulation in isolated HIT
Re-exposure of Heparin
Proportion of patients with heparin-dependent antibodies after an episode of HIT
Prevention of HIT
Avoid-Heparin InitiativeInstitution-wide strategy of replacing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications
Early diagnosis of HITPlatelet counts - how often
Platelet counts - how often
HIT ndash Take Home Message
Slide Number 60
Slide Number 61
Laboratory assays for HIT antibodies
HPF4 PaGIA test
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Two DTIs
Danaparoid Sodium ndash Orgaran
Treatment of Thrombosis Complicating HIT Danaparoid
Anti Factor Xa Assay
platelet transfusions for HIT
avoid-heparin initiative Prevention rather than early recognition and treatment of HIT
Decision making when confronting possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia new mechanisms amp novel therapies
HIT ndash Heparin induced thrombocytopenia
The PF4heparin antigenic complex
Slide Number 75
PF4heparin immune response
Mechanisms of thrombosis
Slide Number 78
Updates in HIT epidemiology
Updates in disease presentation
clinical variants of HITdelayed-onset HIT and spontaneous HIT
Updates in diagnosis
Is ldquoChoosing Wiselyrdquo wise enough
Pre- and posttest probability of HIT using a combined approach of the 4Ts and EIAs
emerging therapies for HIT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
prevention of rather than early recognition and treatment of HITAvoid-Heparin Initiative
Annual incidence of suspected HIT positive HIT assay adjudicated HIT and HITT per 10thinsp000 admissions 2003-2005 and 2007-2012