hnrs 353 evaluations - spring 09

8/14/2019 HNRS 353 Evaluations - Spring 09

1/54

SPRING 200' GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY June 2, 2009STUDEIiIT INSTlIIlCTIClHAh RATING SYSTEM REPORT 12132310

STUDElilTS ENROLLED IN THIS CLASS: 28 COMPLETED FORMS: 26INFORMATION

NAME: Sample , Mark LHumanities & Social SciencesDEPT: Honors ProgramHNRS 353004

INFORMATION

of ef fo r t put into th e course: 1 very low Savery highabscent from cIs , 1-0-1 2 ~ 2 - 3 3-4-5 4-6-7 5_8 or moreGrades: I= F 2=D 3aC 4=B 5=ALevel: l=Fresh 2aSOph 3=Jr 4=Sr 5=GradGPA: l=below 2.0 2_2-2.50 3-2.51-3.0 4a3.01-3.5 5=3.51-4i s : 5_required 4=elective 3=gen ed 2=Other

PERCElilTAGES(1) (2) (3) (4 )D

Course re 'mts were c lear ly 0.0 0.0 3.8 34.6s ta ted in th e syl labus 0 .3 1. 8 6.1 24 .50. 7 1.2 4 .5 16.90 .8 1.3 5. 2 19.6

Th e course was well 0 .0 7 .7 15.4 34.6organized 2.3 3 .8 10 .4 24.41 .2 2 .5 7. 9 21.21.5 2.9 8 .8 23.0

The instructor explained 0.0 0.0 15.4 30 .8th e material c lear ly 2.3 3 .3 13.2 26 .31 .2 2.9 8.9 22 .31 .7 3.6 10.5 24.0

Comments an d suggestions 7. 7 0 .0 15.4 19.2on returned material helpfu 3 .5 4 .0 1 4 .4 2 2 .91 .8 3.3 9 .4 20 .32 .3 4 .0 10.5 20.5

Th e instructor showed 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 7 .7respect for students 0.5 0.5 3.0 12.70 .8 1.2 3.3 12.10.9 1 .4 4.1 14.3

Th e ins t ruc tor was acces 0.0 0.0 0 .0 11 .5s ible in person or elect ron 0.5 1 .5 3 .0 15.30.9 1 .6 5 .4 15.41 .0 1 .8 6 .1 1 7 .4

The ins t ruc tor followed 0.0 0 .0 3 .8 26 .9th e s ta ted c r s . grading p ' l 0.8 2 .0 6.0 17 .80 .5 0.8 4.1 15.10.6 0 .9 4 .4 16.3

. The exams ref lected what 0.0 0 .0 8.0 12.0was covered in th e course 0 .5 1.3 5.1 14.80 .9 1 .6 5. 1 15.21 .1 2 .0 5 .9 15.9

The as 'mnts helped me 0 .0 3 .8 19.2 50.0learn the material 3 .3 6 .5 13 .4 24 .71 .7 3 .1 8.6 21.52. 0 3 .5 9.4 22.1

Readings helped me understa 0 .0 1 1 .5 25 .9 23.1the course topic 2.5 6 .6 11.6 21.01 .7 3.2 9.9 22.42.2 3.7 11 .4 23.1

(5 )S

61.566 .476.512.842.358.667.063.853.854.264.560 .157.751.160.955.192.383.282.579.388.579.475.371.669.271.478.073.532.040 .962.457.826.950 .962.158.538.555.760 .454.3

(6 )NA

0.01.00 .20. 30 .00.50.10.10 .00. 80 .10. 10.04 .04.27 .60 .00 .00 .00. 10 .00.31 .42 .10 .02. 01 .44.2

48.037.314.817.20. 01 .33 .04 .60 .02 .52 .55 .3

RESPONSE KEYS. STRONGLY AGREE. (5 )

(4 ). 13) (2 )D. .STRONGLY DISAGREE. (1)

NA NOT APPLICABLE (6)

1 2 3 4 51 1 9 9 616 5 1 3 oo o o 12 14o 23 3 o oo o 2 8 161 4 o 20 o

IMEDlAIiI S.D Reap.

CLASS 4.58 5. 0 0.57 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4.57 5. 0 0.71 396COL/SCHL/INST 4.68 5. 0 0.68 23,997UJUVERSITY 4.63 5. 0 0.72 67,975CLASS 4.12 4. 0 0 .96 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4.34 5.0 0 .97 39 4COL/SCHL/INST 4 .51 5. 0 0.84 23,854UNIVBRSITY 4.45 5.0 0.88 67,672CLASS 4.38 5.0 0 .75 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4.28 5 .0 0.97 39 5COL/SCHL/mST 4.46 5 .0 0.87 23,951ONIVERSITY 4.37 5 .0 0.93 67,867CLASS 4.19 5.0 1.20 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4.19 5 .0 1 .07 397COL/ SCHL/ INST 4.41 5 .0 0.93 23 ,876UNIVERSITY 4 .32 5 .0 1.00 67,583CLASS 4 .92 5.0 0.28 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4.78 5 .0 0.57 39 4COL/SCHL/INST 4.74 5 .0 0.65 23 ,857UNIVBRSITY 4.70 5 .0 0.70 67 ,607CLASS 4.88 5.0 0.35 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4 .72 5 .0 0.64 398COL/SCHL/INST 4.65 5 .0 0.74 23.835UNIVBRSITY 4.60 5.0 0.77 67 ,474CLASS 4.65 5 .0 0.57 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4.60 5.0 0.76 398COL/SCHL/mST 4.72 5 .0 0.63 23,884UNIVBRSITY 4.68 5 .0 0.67 67,661CLASS 4.46 5.0 0.76 25DEPT/PROGRAM 4.51 5 .0 0.80 391COL/ SCHL/INST 4.60 5 .0 0.77 23,650UNIVBRSITY 4.54 5 .0 0.84 67,061CLASS 4.00 4 .0 0.80 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4.15 5 .0 1.09 397COL/SCHL/INST 4.43 5.0 0.91 23,843UNIVERSITY 4.38 5 .0 0 .95 67 ,433CLASS 3.88 4 .0 1.08 26DEPT/PROGRAM 4.24 5.0 1 .07 39 5COL/SCHL/INST 4.40 5 .0 0.92 23,765UNIVBRSITY 4.30 5.0 0.98 67 ,309
http:///reader/full/2_2-2.50http:///reader/full/2_2-2.50


2/54

2009 GEORGE MlISOH IJNIVSRSITY June 2, 2009S'TUDEHT lllSTRUCTIONAL RATnlG SYSTEM REPORT 12132310S'TUDEHTS EHROLLED IN THIS CLIISS, 28 COIIPI.ETED FORJII!h 26

llU\ME, Sample , Mark L S. STRONGLY AGREE. (5 )Humanities & Social Sciences (4 )DEPT: Honors Program . .13}COURSE: HNRS 353 (2 )00 4 D. .STRONGLY DISAGREE. ( I )HA .NOT APPLICABlJ! (6 )PERCEI'I'rAGES

( I ) (2 ) (3) (4) (S) (6 ) #D S HA MEDIAN S. D Resp../\.ss'1I!nts and exams _re 3.8 23.1 15.4 26.9 30.8 0 .0 CLIISS 3.58 4.0 1 .26 2re turned proper ly 2 .0 6.1 9.1 22.3 56.6 3.8 DEPT/PROGRAM 4.30 5 .0 1.02 39

1 .4 2 .2 7.6 20.3 66.6 1 .9 COL/SCHL/INST 4.51 5 .0 0.85 23,751.7 2.5 7.8 20.1 62.0 5 .9 OliIVERSITY 4.47 5 .0 0.89 67,19

Th e i n s ' t r covered th e imp 0.0 0 .0 15.4 26.9 57.7 0.0 CLIISS 4.42 5 .0 0.75 2aspect o f th e course 0.8 1 .3 8 .6 19.2 69.7 0.5 DEPT{PlIDGRAM 4.57 5 .0 0.77 390.11 1 .3 5 .3 17.3 75.1 0.3 COL/SCHL/DIST 4.65 5 .0 0.71 23,890.9 1 .6 6.2 20.2 70.7 0.4 1JHIVERSrrY 4.59 5 .0 0.75 67,70

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Th e ins ' tr made th e class 0.0 7 .7 11 .5 30.11 50.0 0. 0 CLIISS 4.23 4 .5 0.96 2i n t e l l ec tua l ly s t iuu la t ing 4 .8 5 .6 12.4 19.2 57.7 0.3 DEPT/PROOR./IIi! 4.20 5 .0 1.15 39

2 .3 3.4 9 .2 19.6 65.4 0. 1 COL/SCHL/DIST 4.42 5.0 0.96 23.813.1 4 .2 11.0 21.3 60.1 0.2 OliIVERSTTY 4.31 5.0 1.03 67,51Th e i n s ' t r encouraged 0.0 0 .0 11.5 26.9 61.5 0. 0 CLIISS 4.50 5 .0 0.72 2t he s tuden t s to be involved 1 .0 2 .5 8 .6 17.3 70.6 0.0 DEPT/PlIDGRAM 4.54 5.0 0.83 39

1 .4 2 .5 7 .5 17.7 70.4 0. 5 COL/SCHL/DIST 4.54 5 .0 0.85 23,732.0 3 .4 9.1 19.5 65.2 0.7 1JHIVERSrrY 4 . 4 3 5 .0 0.94 67,26OVERALL RATING OF INSTRUCTION AND COURSE

PERCE!lTAGES(I) (2) 13} (4) lS I (6) #POOR OX g'L HA AREA MEDIAN S. D Resp.

My overa l l r a t ing of th e 0.0 4 .0 8 .0 32.0 56.0 0.0 CLIISS 4.40 5.0 0.82 2teaching 2 .5 3 .8 11. 7 25.1 56.9 0.0 DEPT /PROOR./lli! 4.30 5 .0 0.99 391 .6 2 .4 9.5 21 .9 64.7 0.0 COL/SCHL/DIST 4.46 5 .0 0.88 23,601 .9 2 .9 11.1 23.8 60.2 0.0 OliIVERSITY 4.37 5 .0 0.93 66,87

My overa l l r a t ing of t h i s 0.0 4 .0 24.0 40.0 32.0 0.0 CLIISS 4.00 4.0 0.87 2course 4 .8 7.4 20.6 24.6 42.6 0 .0 DEPT/PlIDGRAM 3.93 4 .0 1 .1 7 391 .8 3 .7 14.4 27.3 52.8 0 .0 COL/SCHL/DIST 4.26 5 .0 0.96 23,382.6 4 .3 15.9 27.9 49.4 0.0 UBIVERSITY 4.17 4 .0 1.01 66,31

i s th e mddlemost of the ranked scores. S.D (Standard Deviation) i s a measure o f the d isper s ion o f scores from th eFor example. i f a l l students agree t h a t Prof . x i s excel len t ly prepared , th e mean would he 5 . an d t h e standardwould be O. HA responses an d non-respondents a re represented in percentages , b ut not in other ca lcu la t ions .


3/54

GEORGE MAsON UNIVERSITY Office of Institutional Research and Reporting

CourseEl1l1.luationForm Course Title (e.g., HIST 101 ___ _ _ _ _ _ __--,,(_,,;-'-.C'_L+-l_ Instructor's Name _ ~ _ ' _ a _ f ' - ' , - ' - f J _ l LPlease thoughtfaDy consider the following statements and indicate your level of agreeJDeDt or disagreement.- c : : : : : : : ~ . USE NO.2 PENCIL j iU iJ W or '" CorrectMark eo 0

stnm:IJ NotCourse Organization and Planning StruagJy Disapee AppIkaWe..11:" Ape1) Course requirements were dearly stated in the syllabus 0) The course was well organized CD 03) The instructor explained the material dearly 04) Comments and suggestions on returned material were helpful CD 05) The instructor showed respect for students 0

''1....\6) The instructor was accessible either in person or electronically 0Assignments, Exams, and Grading :i '

\j

7) The instructor followed the stated course grading policy 0(f)8) The exams reflected what was covered in the course 09) The assignments (projects, papers, presentations, etc.) helped melearn th e material 010) Readings helped me understand the course topic CD 0(1'.- ,_ . /1) Assignments and exams were returned promptly 0

Course Delivery ~ 12) The instructor covered th e important aspects of the course as

outlined in th e syllabus. @ CD 03) The instructor made th e class intellectually stimulating @ @ 014) The instructor encouraged th e students to be actively involved in.."he material through discussion and other activities @ CD 0

How would you rate the teaching of this course, and the course itself?:";,'ii!'Please do your best to separate your feelings about the course from tlie'wa15) My overall rating of the teaching16) My overall rating of this courseStudent Information '.

17) The amount of effort you put into the course 18) The number of times you were absent from class 19) The grade you expect in this class: 20) Your class levelis: 21) Your overall GPA is: 22) This course is:

These questions aTeon 41 separate JHlge. 23) 24) 25)26)27)

On the backofthis form. "leaseanswer the foUuwing questiOJlS:1) What aspects of the course and the way it was taught helped you to learn?2) What modifications do you suggest for th e next time th e course is taught?

11um1rJOU fer yeu.rbrputl(9 SCANTRON CORPORATION 2006CUSTOM FORM NO. F20054-GMU 1M4 04$ -515-10 9 8 7All Rights Reserved.


4/54

2-01k (j[ t COu,nW1?Jvt.


5/54

-

The instructor explained the material clearlyComments an d suggestions on returned material were helpfulThe instructor showed respect for studentsThe instructor was accessible either in person or electromc.ally

d GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITYOffice of Institutional Research and Reporting

U N I V E R S I T Y Course EI1"llUltion FormCourse Title (e.g., HIST 101 001) Mn.fS 3Q'3 ' ()t> '1 Instructor's Name Na A ~ . ~ ~ R -'O -\0I.t.hi 01 J ,(\ ~ r o . d ' r ~ #closs . \ ~ J \ - \19 o l ' 5 G { ~ O J \ \ " , - ( J I ~ ~ u o H i f e - ~ c n - a \ ~ wib ~ ) t A . - s , \ \ a b \ l . ~ I".)OS G U f ~ \'1 d\arr-J -::L ~ . H } ~ t '5VS wh.., 11f f O ~ ~ i d t ~ t J ftor.tt #tIL ~ M t t ~ .


47/54

GEORGE MAsON UNIVERSITY Office of IDStitutionaI Research and Reporting

UNIVEaSITY CourseEl1"ltuJtionFormCourse Tit le (e.g., HIST 101 001) HAiRS 3 - 00 L1 Instructor's Name - - " " " ~ ' - - ' - " - _______Please thoughtfully cODsider the foDowiDg statements aad indicat'e your levelof agreemeat or disagreemeDt.-=::::>=_ USE NO.2 PENCIL .-=:W W or CorrectMark .00

Net5trM&lJCourse Organization and Planning / ' DiApa AppIicaWe1) Course requirements were clearly stated in the syllabus 0(1)2) The course was well organized 03) The instructor explained th e material clearly @ rl'",'- ' 04) Comments and suggestions on returned material were belpful CD 05) The instructor showed respect for students .:I; ( ~ ) 06) The instructorwas accessible either in person or electronically 0Assignments, Exams, and Grading , ~ ; 7) The instructor followed th e stated course grading policy : ! : ~ 0) The exams reflected what was covered in th e course 9) The assignments (projects, papers, presentations, etc.) helped melearn th e material @


48/54


49/54

-

GEORGE MAsON UNIVERSITYd Office of Institutional Research aDd ReportiDgN I V E R S I T Y CourseElNIlrurtien Form

Course Title (e.g., HfST 101001) H NRS : '53 C


50/54

Qft... "-\0+ (1a..\lOLUQ'3 ..J.5, \ l!w.mad () \0\ ttCXh fu 5 o . . ~ ( ) . U I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~d-Co. ~ ~ ) f t ! l ~ - 3 . I ~ ~ ) tpo.J6 -tecus \eLss CK" f n ~ ~ a . . f Y t

.. Yd {(tV\o.!e G o . \ \ ~ } ~ . s lnh21:p{\)\ ., {h.Q 0 W d ~ . \d 't?o\r n o J . ~ t t e o . . f " h ~ ( ) . f l . U lf'rOt"C. , ""+0


51/54

d GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITYOffice of IDStituticmal Research. and ReportiDg

UNIVE.SITY Cou.rse B11tflrurtion.1JormCourse Title (e.g., HIST 101 001) tiN ts 3 ' ) ~ . 0 0 ' f Instructor's Name 1'10.'1[( S o \ A ~ l ePlease thoaghtfally consider the foDowiDg statemeats and iDdicate your level of agreementor disap'eemfld:. -::::::s-:::: USE NO.2 PENCIL . d'QU L; or Correct Mark .0 0

Course Organization and Planning . :'1) Course requirements were dearly stated in the syllabus2) The course was wen organizedCommunication and Faculty/Student I n t e ~ , ~ , 3) The instructor explained th e material dearly ( ~ ~ \.1 04) Comments an d suggestions on returned materia l were helpful @ @ CD 05) The instructor showed respect for students (!" @ 06) The instructor was accessible either in person or electronically @) CD 0Assignments, Exams, and Grading ."'7) The instructor followed the stated course grading policy G:' 08) The exams reflected what was covered in the course CD ) The assignments (projects, papers, presentations. etc.) helped me

learn th e material "1: :r: 010) Readings helped me understand th e course topic 011) Assignments and exams were returned promptly 0wi!Course Delivery ;,

12) The instructor covered th e important aspects of th e course asoutlined in th e syllabus. @ ( ~ ) 0(t .3) The instructor made the class intellectually stimulating :3:' :!: 0 4) The instructor encouraged the students to be actively involved inthe material through discussion and other activities @ CD 0How would you rate the teaching of this course, and the course itself? I' ,Please do your best to separate your feelings about the course from wa

OK. Po.15) My overall rating of the teaching t4; l '- '16) My overall rating of this course (g; G:I,- Student Information . :17) The amount of effort you put into the course o Veryhigb o Moderate 0 o Low18) The number of times you were absent from class 08ormore 06-7 04-5 02-3 . 0 -119) The grade you expect in this class: eA OB 0 ( ' OD OF20) Your class level is: o Fresh. e Soph. o Junior o Senior o Grad.21) Your overall GPA is: .351-4 03.01-3.5 02.51-3 02.01-2.5 o below2.022) 1his course is: o Required o Elective eGenEd o Other

Deseqrtestimrsare OJI I I BeJ'HI1Wfe page. 5 4 3 2 t23) 24) '! @; :t ([) r4! t!;, CI;25) 26) '-./ 'i. ',b '- 27) @

On tile b a c k o f t I r i B f u r m ~ pleasecmswertlte1) What aspects of the course and th e way it was taught helped you to learn?2) What modifications do you suggest for the next time the course is taught?

2 " l I I m i : , . . t i w ~ i r q n d !@ S C A N T R O N C O R P O R A n O N 2 ~ . -, CUSTOM FORM NO. F20054-GMU 1M4 0406 -51!)- 10987All Rights Reserved.


52/54

S-fC ( w J ;-rt1 l c t J . . L - h . ~ V\A (\5't 7.t \..00-S QiA .",-Lr.e(A..A..qJ."-'1 weJlc;:/

r. /.efA , , ~ C ~ (0# r; ( [f o f ~ , W q f Y J ; ~ ' ) lvP.fItML r o o ~ _ U . . . Q v ; . . { ' - a 1 1 . a l y / l C ( J : ~ u.kZlc N v.i\Li, f . ~ ~ vv..e LYf/ov-e v t < . Q v ~ (2)0-1 # i fO(-'iC

\


53/54

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITYd Office of IDStitu.tiODal Research ami ReportiDgMisoNUNIVEaSITY CourseBl1l1bu1tionPormCourse Title (e.g., HIST 101 001) \\N2...-S ~ S : > QQ.\= Instructor's Name ~ m \ > \ - ePlease thoaghtfally CODSider the foDowiDg statements aucI iDcticateyour levelofagreement or disagreement.-c::::::;:= USE NO.2 PENCIL ,j;W L or. . . . - - 'HiWIJ-hWW'4i Correct Mark .00', StraJIr IbaB&IJ NotCourse Organization and Planning ,,:c , ~ . Acre Disapee AppIicaWeI I1) Course requirements were dearly stated in the syllabus @ 0

2) The course was well organized : @ CD 00,Communication and Faculty/Student Inte

@ :1) 0) The instructor explained the material dearly @4) Comments and suggestions on returned material were helpful @ CD 05) The instructor showed respect for students '4'- : ~ : CD 0@ :[ ; Q)) The instructor was accessible either in person or electronically 0Assignments, Exams) and Grading I I @7) The instructor followed the stated course grading policy 08) The exams reffectedwhat was covered in th e course @ CD 0) The assignments (projects, papers, presentations, etc.) helped me ,1)learn the material 1, GJ 0

10) Readings helped me understand th e course topic CD 01) Assignments and exams were returned promptly @ T 0Course Delivery "12) The instructor covered the important aspects of th e course as

outlined in th e syllabus. @) @ (!) 013) -:!;The instructor made the class intellectually stimulating


54/54

lS) " - \ ) \ k V \ \ e ( g d ~ 1,VJ '711t 0 o \ l ( ) l J J ~ 'Doole usa S. t v r l C \ ~

hnrs 353 evaluations - spring 09

Documents