hobart acal presentation public - tasmanian council … · for reading and writing during...
TRANSCRIPT
Session Outline
Welcome: Nga mihi nui ki a koutou
Introduction to the Vee heuristic
Early attempts to combine the Vee with Literacy Professional Development
workplace)
Te whare tapa wha
Recent work using the Vee in Te Puna
Questions/Discussion
Trisha Hanifin TPA 2012
Vee Diagram
Theoretical/Conceptual (Thinking)
Focus questions
Methodological (Doing)
Events/Objects (observing)
Philosophy
Theories
Principles
Concepts
Answers require an active interplay
between the right side and left side
Claims - values - knowledge
Transformations
Records
Gowin’s Vee heuristic, p3, Learning How to Learn, (1994) CUP
Novak and Gowin’s view of education
it ‘is the process by which we actively seek to change the meaning of experience.’
Literacy and professional development Triangle 1. adapted from Buehl D, (2001) Triangle 2. adapted from Novak and Gowin (1984)
Text
Context Learner
Teaching and
learning strategies
Professional development
Knowledge Method
Observation
Thinking Doing
Observing What kinds of problems have we observed in our classrooms?
What kinds of structured observations (assessments) do we use?
Literacy
Knowledge
Frameworks
Theories
Philosophies
Programme and course design
Teaching and learning strategies and activities
Focus question: How can we address our students’ decoding issues?
Vee heuristic adapted from Novak and Gowin. (1984)
Thinking Doing
Observing What kinds of issues have we observed in our programmes, courses, and in the classroom?
What kinds of structured observations (assessments) do we use?
Literacy
Knowledge
Frameworks
Theories
Philosophies
Programme and course design
Teaching and learning strategies and activities
Focus question: How can we embed literacy into our programmes?
Vee heuristic adapted from Novak and Gowin. (1984)
The National Certificate in Adult literacy and Numeracy Education
(Vocational and workplace) – six key frameworks
The Literacy Dynamic: (Buehl, 2001)
The Vee Heuristic: a model for professional development (Novak and Gowin, 1984)
The Four Literacy Roles: (Freebody and Luke, 1990,1999)
The Six Components of Effective Literacy Practice (IRA, www.reading.org NIFL, www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading Kruidenier, 2002, Honig, 2001)
Reading Process/The Active Reading Model: BDA (Workbase, 2005, 2006, Duffy, 2006)
The Learning Progressions for Adult Literacy and Language (NZ Tertiary Education Commission, 2008 )
The Literacy dynamic �NZ Tertiary Education Commission
Know the
learner
Know the
demands
The Literacy
dynamic
Know what to
do
BDA - The active reading model: a framework for working with text
Before Preparation for reading and writing
During Engagement with the text
After Reflection on the text
Culturally responsive practice “…tertiary courses that focus on up-skilling
teachers must appreciate the interconnection of ethnicity, power and privilege, while at the same time be active and intrinsically motivational… {there} is the need for all educators, whether tertiary or school, to study and interact with the intricacies of culturally responsive practice and to integrate the newly acquired knowledge into their respective contexts.”
Reference: HuakinaMcfarlane
Good Practice Publication ebook: www.akoaotearoa.ac.nz/gppg-ebook
Trisha Hanifin TPA 2012
Topic: Assessment for Transition
Knowledge (conceptual) (thinking)
Focus questions Methodological (doing)
Observation of events (observing)
Key words: - concepts - frameworks - philosophies - theories - beliefs
Questions:
What understanding do staff have of the enquiry process?
Do staff have a shared understanding of the purposes and functions of assessment?
* What is the process of enquiry you
want your students to use in assignments?
What concepts are foundational for students to grasp?
What concepts occur frequently?
1) What challenges do students face when they do their first assessment event? Key words: - Classroom practice
- teaching and learning - student engagement
Questions: How do we scaffold the processes and activities students find most challenging? How do we find out how well students are doing? How can students be helped to understand and plan for the assessment load? How do we make this explicit?
Enquiry process
Key words: - tasks - skills - behaviour - practices - processes
Questions: What are the academic demands of
working through the enquiry process? What demands do students find most
challenging? How do we collect data on this? How do we interpret the data?
Content Demands
Autonomy
Topic: Embedding Academic Literacies
Theoretical/Conceptual (Thinking)
Focus question:
Methodological (Doing)
Observing/evaluating
Key Questions: When have you observed your
learners having foundational or academic literacy needs?
What diagnostic assessment do you use?
How do you evaluate what is working?
Philosophy: professional development is about assisting teachers to construct new understanding on 3 levels: thinking doing, observing
Frameworks: The literacy dynamic; The Learning Progressions; The Assessment Tool; Unitec’s Academic literacies Policy; Living Curriculum…
Concepts:literacies; demands; needs; embedding; literacy development; assessment; evaluation
Key Questions: What guides your thinking about your program? What teaching and learning principles guide your teaching? What does embedding literacies mean to you? Are you familiar with Unitec’s Academic literacies Policy?
How can we support teachers to embed foundational and
academic literacies in programs/
courses?
Actions:
Key questions: How do you articulate the demands of your program/course to your learners? What teaching and learning activities do you currently use to support your learners’ foundational and academic literacy needs? How do you give feedback to your learners about their progress? How does your program/course use the Student Learning Centre and the library to support learners? What (literacies) professional development have you engaged in? What aspects of embedding foundational or academic literacies would you be most interested in learning more about?
Vee Heuristic based on Novak and Gowin (1984) Trisha Hanifin and Bettina Schwenger TPA 2012 Draft 2
“The most powerful and enduring change in the classroom will be achieved by professionally informed and articulate teachers… it is the teacher who is one of the most instrumental links between the minds of students and their future achievements in the multi
st century. Collaboration involving the diversity of voices seeking reform in literacies is essential. Meeting
st
)