Module Handbook HUG 2125

Long Term Care and Support for the Older Adult

Module Leader Jacqui Hitchen

hitchenj@edgehill.ac.uk 01695 657027

FACULTY OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE

Department of Applied Health & Social Care

FdSc Health and Well-being Student Intake: September 2012

Holy Cross Campus

2

CONTENTS

Introduction Page 3

Learning Outcomes Page 4 Assessment Strategy Page 5 Assignment Guidance Page 6 Assessment Submission Page 7 Confidentiality Statement Page 10 Learning Resources Page 11

Appendix A: Turnitin

Appendix B: Marking Criteria

Timetable

3

INTRODUCTION Welcome to module HUG 2125 Long Term Care and Support for the Older Adult. On successful completion of all the elements within the module, you will be awarded 20 credits at Level 5. The module is based at the Faculty of Health and Social Care (Holy Cross campus) and is designed to enable you to develop and enhance your knowledge, awareness and understanding of the issues within the care and support of the older adult with a long term condition. Throughout the module I will be your module leader and my contact details are listed on this handbook cover. If you wish to arrange a tutorial outside the timetabled support, please contact me to arrange an appointment. This will ensure that I am available to see you and will prevent a wasted journey for yourself. This module handbook should be read in conjunction with your Programme Handbook provided at the start of the course and available in your BlackBoard area, which details important information regarding confidentiality, academic rules, regulations and support. On behalf of all the staff within the Faculty of Health and Social Care, I would like to offer you a warm welcome, I hope that you enjoy this module and wish you every success.

Jacqui Hitchen Module Leader

4

ONLINE SUPPORT FOR LEARNING To support independent study you will have access to Blackboard 9.1 (Learning Edge). This online area contains links to relevant module materials available on the internet as well as links to electronic journals and books to provide flexible 24/7 access. LEARNING OUTCOMES On successful completion of the module you will be able to: 1. Present an analytical review in relation to access to care and user involvement in

decision making, highlighting how change could be managed. 2. Evaluate the promotion of rehabilitation and independence for the older adult in relation

to current service. 3. Review current health promotion activities within current service provisions and

formulate a development plan which promotes the independence of the older person. 4. Examine social exclusion factors and their impact on the older person’s health and

wellbeing.

5

ASSESSMENT STRATEGY Formative Assessment Within this module a range of formal and informal assessment procedures will be employed during the learning process to support you in achieving the learning outcomes and to improve your performance in the summative assessment. This will include a formative seminar presentation at the mid-point of the module. Summative Assessment The summative assessment for this module will be in two parts: Part 1 15 minute seminar presentation. This must meet Learning Outcome nos 1 and 2. 30% of the mark. Part 2 Written assignment. 2000 notional words; This must meet Learning Outcome nos 3 and 4; 70% of the mark.

In order to be awarded the 20 credits, you must achieve a minimum mark of 40% in both parts of the assessment.

6

ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE Seminar: You are required to present a fifteen (15) minute seminar in which you discuss an issue in relation to the access to care and the promotion of rehabilitation and independence for an older adult who has a long term condition. Within your presentation you will be required to demonstrate:

- An analytical approach;

- An ability to problem solve;

- Utilisation of up to date literature/evidence from research to support points raised. You will be expected to supply relevant handouts and recommended reading/reference list to your colleagues as part of the seminar presentation. The seminar will be marked out of 100% and meets learning outcomes 1 and 2. Essay: You are required to produce a written piece of work of approximately 2000 words in which you discuss and analyse factors which impact upon an individual’s ability to maintain their independence with a long term condition. The discussion must include analysis of health promotion activities and society’s influence upon the older person’s health and wellbeing. The assignment must:

- Follow a logical sequence;

- Be presented in a protective cover (but not a bulky hard backed file or individual plastic sleeves);

- Be computer generated;

- Demonstrate your ability to utilise research/literature to support the points/issues/arguments raised;

- Follow the Harvard referencing system;

- Be analytical in style – do not adopt a descriptive, narrative approach;

- Include consideration to social exclusion factors. The assignment will be marked out of 100% and meets learning outcomes 3 and 4.

7

ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION

Online Submission Date: 14th January 2013 Before 12.00 noon

Provisional Marks available by: 5th February 2013

Seminar Presentation: 7th January 2013

Provisional Marks available by: 28th January 2013

Your assignments should be generated electronically and submitted online. Instructions for online submission and the how to view results can be found in Appendix A of this handbook.

Non-submission will result in a fail grade being recorded.

8

General Submission Requirements

Assignments must be electronically generated and you must keep an electronic copy of your assignment.

Appropriate referencing should take place throughout your assignment, utilising the Harvard Referencing System. Useful information and advice can be obtained via the University’s website at:

General Guidance for Academic Skills, including referencing: http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/ls/support/academicskills/#intro Full Harvard Referencing Guide: http://www.eshare.edgehill.ac.uk/1133/1/HR_guide_RevisedDec2011.pdf

In-text authors and dates of publication, the work you include in your reference list and any appendices you attach are not included within the word count. Direct quotations from other sources are included within the word limit. Appendices are not marked and for information only.

Assignments are expected to adhere to guidance regarding the recommended wordage and failure to do so may influence the final grade awarded.

You are responsible for stating the word count when submitting your assignment.

The marking criteria being used in this assessment strategy are attached in Appendix B of this handbook.

Confidentiality and academic malpractice regulations apply to all assessments.

Please note if you are unable to submit your assignment due to sickness or other exceptional mitigating circumstances, it will be necessary for you to apply to the Head of Department for an extension or to submit an exceptional circumstances form along with appropriate evidence (e.g. a medical certificate/independent evidence).

The details of the external examiner responsible for the assessment of this module can be found within the Health Student Wiki at: https://go.edgehill.ac.uk/wiki/display/health/External+Examiners+-+Student+Info

9

Specific Presentation Requirements

You are required to provide a hardcopy of your presentation and notes on the day of your presentation.

Ensure you arrive at least 15 minutes before the start time.

Assignments must be electronically generated and you must keep an electronic copy of your presentation.

Please note if you are unable to attend your presentation due to sickness or other exceptional mitigating circumstances, it will be necessary for you to submit an exceptional circumstances form along with appropriate evidence (e.g. a medical certificate/independent evidence).

10

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT There should be no reference within your assessed work to any name or identifying information relating to patients/clients or any staff member of any organisation. Inclusion of such information will result in a failed submission. Where it is relevant to state name of any organisation then the information should be supported by reference to published documents that are available to the general public and form approved official documentation relating the operation and provision of that organisation. It would be considered relevant to include the name of an organisation when:

Discussing/debating/analysing published data relating to the performance of that organisation.

Discussing/debating/analysing published and approved policy and strategy of that organisation.

Discussing/debating/analysing published research/evaluations/audit/opinion, which relates to and names that organisation.

For further details relating to both assessment processes and regulations, please refer to your Programme Handbook.

11

LEARNING RESOURCES Please use the library catalogue to access all your print and e-resources. Braun, K.L., Pietsch, J.H. & Blanchette, P.L. (2000) Cultural Issues in End of Life Decision Making. Sage Publications Ltd. Battison, T. (2003) Caring for Someone with Depression. UK: The Depression Alliance/Age Concern. Curran, S. & Wattis, J. P. (2008) Practical Management of Affective Disorders in Older People: A Multi-Professional Approach. Radcliffe Publishing. Department of Health (2005) Supporting People with Long Term Conditions: An NHS and Social Care Model to Support Local Innovation and Integration. London: TSO. Howard, H. (2004) Caring for Someone in their own Home. UK: Carers UK/Age Concern. Keller, C. & Fleury, I. (1999) Health Promotion for the Elderly. Sage Publications Ltd. Means, R., Morbey, H. & Smith, R. (2002) From Community Care to Market Care?: The Development of Welfare Services for Older People. The Policy Press. Nelson, T.D. (2004) Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons. USA: MIT. Netting, E.F. (1999) Enhancing Primary Care of Elderly People. [Garland Reference Library of Social Science Series]. Garland Science. Park, D.C. & Morrell, R. (1999) Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients: Cognitive and Human Factors Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pierson, J. (2002) Tackling Social Exclusion. London: Routledge. Websites Age UK: www.ageuk.org.uk Alzheimer’s Society www.alzheimers.org.uk Association of Services for the Elderly www.carestandards.gov.uk Royal College of Physicians www.rcplondon.ac.uk Department of Health www.dh.gov.uk Department of Health, Older People’s NSF News www.dh.gov.uk/Policy Skills for Health Older People’s National Workforce Competence Framework Guide www.skillsforhealth.org.uk Learning Services has a range of journals, databases and e-books to enable you to search for high quality, evidence based information. A full list of the resources, supporting information and Frequently Asked Questions be found on the health and social care subject Pages: http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/ls/resources/health/

12

A discovery service is a single search tool that provides fast and simple access to print and electronic material. Use EDS to search for print books, eBooks, journals, full-text articles and much more. They search the library catalogue and the majority – although not all – of Edge Hill’s electronic resources. Use the EDS link in the library catalogue. Key Online databases and journal collections All resources are available through the health and social care subject pages or the library catalogue. Learning Services has 17,000 journals available on-line. Cinahl Cochrane Library –full text Proquest Nursing – full text Internurse – full text Wiley Online Library – full text PsycInfo Social Care Online Anatomy TV For multi-disciplinary and more specialist resources, there is more information on the health and social care subject pages. http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/ls/resources/health/ E-books Edge Hill has a collection of over 79,000 e-books which can be accessed 24/7. Links are in the library catalogue or subject web pages MyiLibrary Ebrary Ebsco e-books Ovid e-books (Made Incredibly Easy! Series)

13

APPENDIX A Instructions for Online Submission

TURNITIN Ensure front cover sheet is attached and completed prior to submission. Follow the following steps to submit your assignment through Turnitin. 1. Access http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/ 2. Login using your username and password 3. Access Learning Edgehill 4. Access the Module Area 5. Access Module Assessment Area 6. Click on Turnitin Drop Box 7. Complete form add Module Code 8. Click on Browse button to locate your assignment that is saved 9. Double click the file name to start load process 10. Select the upload button 11. Confirm content 12. Click submit You will receive an e-mail to your university account to confirm your assignment is submitted. Save a copy. Non-submission will result in a fail grade being recorded. Access and view feedback through Turnitin You will receive an e-mail to your university account informing you that your grade and feedback is available for view. Follow the following steps to view your grade and feedback: 1. Access http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/ 2. Login using your username and password 3. Access Learning Edgehill 4. Access the Module Area 5. Access Module Assessment Area 6. Access Turnitin 7. Click on your Assignment title 8. View Grade and Feedback 9. Click reply to comment on feedback

Save a copy of the assignment and store on the F Drive Contact the Module Lead to report problems encountered with submitting the assignment through Turnitin and viewing your feedback.

14

APPENDIX B

Assignment Marking Criteria: Academic Level 5 Weighting 75% 25%

Descriptor

Grade

Relevant knowledge and understanding

Application of theory to practice (If relevant)

Level of analysis

Level of investigation and use of supporting evidence

Structure presentation and grammar

90-100%

(Distinction)

Deep knowledge of the topic, explicitly related to comprehensive knowledge of the discipline(s). Utilises excellent questioning approach to reach an insightful structured conclusion.

Deep knowledge and understanding and application of theories and principles to practice.

Excellent analysis and synthesis of elements of the argument, including contrary views with excellent reflection.

Extensive evidence /references used effectively and cited accurately. Draws from a wide range of relevant sources to support discussion.

Excellent structure and standard of presentation. Relevant and grammatically sound. Appropriate use of language. Presented in accordance with assignment guidelines.

80-89%

(Distinction)

Thorough, explicit knowledge and understanding of the topic. Clear understanding of the explicit links to some aspects of the wider field.

Thorough, explicit knowledge and understanding and application of theories and principles to practice.

High level of ability to analyse and reflect critically, using a range of perspectives.

Evidence/ references used effectively and cited accurately. Draws from a range of relevant sources to support discussion.

Well-structured and high standard of presentation. Relevant and grammatically sound. Appropriate use of language. Presented in accordance with assignment guidelines.

70-79%

(Distinction)

Thorough, explicit knowledge and understanding of the topic. Ability to accurately use terminology.

Thorough, explicit knowledge and understanding and application of theories and principles to practice.

Demonstrates the good use of analytical skills and the process of reflection.

Evidence/ references used effectively and cited accurately. Utilises relevant material to support discussion.

Clearly and logically presented. Grammatically sound. Appropriate use of language. Presented in accordance with assignment guidelines.

60-69%

(Merit)

Good knowledge and understanding of topic issues. Ability to accurately use terminology.

Applies theories and principles to situations and practice in comprehensive manner.

Demonstrates analysis of key issues and the ability to use reflective skills, where appropriate.

Evidence/ references used effectively to support discussion and cited accurately.

Clearly structured and presented. Relevant and grammatically sound. Appropriate use of language. Presented in accordance with assignment guidelines.

50-59%

(Pass)

Sound, partially implicit, knowledge and understanding of topic issues. Ability to use terminology.

Applies theories and principles to situations/ practice.

Demonstrates some analysis of key issues and use of reflective skills, where appropriate.

Demonstrates a developing ability to use evidence/ references effectively and accurately.

Well structured, presented and grammatically sound. Appropriate use of language. Presented in accordance with assignment guidelines.

40-49%

(Pass)

Lacks depth and breadth in coverage of the subject matter. Meets assessment outcomes at threshold level.

Identifies fact and principles and applies them to situations/ practice.

Developing some ability to analyse key issues and use of reflective skills, where appropriate, but a tendency to be descriptive.

Broad evidence of reading/ investigation. Some use of references and sources cited.

Generally satisfactory presentation and grammatically sound. Appropriate use of language. Presented in accordance with assignment guidelines.

15

Assignment Marking Criteria: Academic Level 5 continued …

Weighting 75% 25%

Descriptor

Grade

Relevant knowledge and understanding

Application of theory to practice (If relevant)

Level of analysis

Level of investigation and use of supporting evidence

Structure presentation and grammar

30-39%

(Fail)

Basic implicit knowledge of some relevant topic issues. Partial understanding. Assessment outcomes are not met.

Demonstrates limited application of theory to practice.

Limited evidence of analysis.

Limited reading/ investigation. Incomplete use of references. Majority of sources not cited.

Spelling and grammatical errors. Limited logical progression. Some inappropriate use of language.

20- 29%

(Fail)

Inadequate knowledge or understanding of topic issues. Some factual errors. Assessment outcomes are not met.

Demonstrates little application of theory to practice.

Little evidence of analysis.

Insufficient reading/ investigation. Incomplete use of references. Most sources not cited.

Many spelling and grammatical errors. Very limited logical progression. In the main inappropriate use of language.

10-19%

(Fail)

Inadequate knowledge or understanding of topic issues. Several factual errors. Assessment outcomes are not met.

No application of theory to practice.

No evidence of analysis.

Lacks evidence of reading/ investigation. Incomplete use of references. Most sources not cited.

Many spelling and grammatical errors. Disorganised – lacks logical progression and inappropriate use of language.

1-9%

(Fail)

No knowledge or understanding of topic issues. Many factual errors. Assessment outcomes are not met.

No application of theory to practice.

No evidence of analysis.

No supporting evidence.

No logical structure. Incomplete sentences. Incomprehensible content.

0% Late submissions without relevant permission. Evidence of academic malpractice as defined by Institutional Policy. Major breach of confidentiality. Evidence of unsafe/harmful or discriminatory practice or presentation of misinformation. Failure to generate assignment electronically.

NB: All work submitted is expected to adhere to guidance regarding the recommended wordage. Failure to do so is likely to influence the final grade awarded.

16

Presentation Marking Criteria: Academic Level 5

Weighting 65% 35%

Descriptor

Grade

Relevant knowledge and understanding

Application of theory to practice (If relevant)

Level of analysis

Level of investigation and use of supporting evidence

Structure and organisation of presentation

90-100%

(Distinction)

Deep knowledge of the topic, explicitly related to comprehensive knowledge of the discipline(s). Utilises excellent questioning approach to reach an insightful structured conclusion.

Deep knowledge and understanding and application or theories and principles to practice.

Excellent analysis and synthesis of elements of the argument including contrary views with excellent reflection.

Extensive evidence/ references used effectively and cited accurately. Draws from a wide range of relevant sources to support discussion.

Well structured and high standard of presentation. Effective use of materials and group dynamics. Excellent communication skills. Excellent time management.

80-89%

(Distinction)

Thorough, explicit knowledge and understanding of the topic. Clear understanding of the explicit links to some aspects of the wider field.

Thorough, explicit knowledge and understanding and application of theories and principles to practice.

High level of ability to analyse and reflect critically using a range of perspectives.

Evidence/ references used effectively and cited accurately. Draws from a range of relevant sources to support discussion.

Well structured and high standard of presentation. Effective use of materials. Excellent communication skills. Excellent group dynamics. Very good time management.

70-79%

(Distinction)

Thorough, explicit knowledge and understanding of the topic. Ability to accurately use terminology.

Thorough, explicit knowledge and understanding and application of theories and principles to practice.

Demonstrates the good use of analytical skills and the process of reflection.

Evidence/ references used effectively and cited accurately. Utilises relevant material to support discussion.

Well-structured and high standard of presentation. Effective use of materials. Manages time well. Very good communication skills.

60-69%

(Merit)

Good knowledge and understanding of topic issues. Ability to accurately use terminology.

Applies theories and principles to situations and practice in comprehensive manner.

Demonstrates analysis of key issues and the ability to use reflective skills, where appropriate.

Evidence/ references used effectively to support discussion and cited accurately.

Clear structure and organisation of presentation observed. Demonstrates an ability to use materials and manage time. Good communication skills.

50-59%

(Pass)

Sound, partially implicit, knowledge and understanding of topic issues. Ability to use terminology.

Applies theories and principles to situations/ practice.

Demonstrates some analysis of key issues and use of reflective skills, where appropriate.

Demonstrates a developing ability to use evidence/ references effectively and accurately.

Presentation demonstrates overall structure and organisation. Demonstrates an ability to use materials. Developing ability to manage time. Good communication skills.

40-49%

(Pass)

Lacks depth and breadth in coverage of the subject matter. Meets assessment outcomes at threshold level.

Identifies fact and principles and applies them to situations/ practice.

Developing some ability to analyse key issues and use of reflective skills, where appropriate, but a tendency to be descriptive.

Broad evidence of reading/investigat-ion. Some use of references and sources cited.

Presentation demonstrates overall structure and organisation. Developing ability to use materials. Awareness of time management. Satisfactory communication skills.

17

Presentation Marking Criteria: Academic Level 5 continued …

Weighting 65% 35%

Descriptor

Grade

Relevant knowledge and understanding

Application of theory to practice (If relevant)

Level of analysis

Level of investigation and use of supporting evidence

Structure and organisation of presentation

30-39%

(Fail)

Basic implicit knowledge of some relevant topic issues. Partial understanding. Assessment outcomes are not met.

Demonstrates limited application of theory to practice.

Limited evidence of analysis.

Limited reading /investigation. Incomplete use of references. Majority of sources not cited.

Presentation demonstrates overall structure and organisation. Limited use of materials. Awareness of time management. Limited communication and management of group dynamics.

20-29%

(Fail)

Inadequate knowledge or understanding of topic issues. Some factual errors. Assessment outcomes are not met.

Demonstrates little application of theory to practice.

Little evidence of analysis.

Insufficient reading/ investigation. Incomplete use of references. Most sources not cited.

Lack of structure and organisation. Limited use of materials. Limited communication skills. No management of group dynamics or awareness of time.

10-19%

(Fail)

Inadequate knowledge or understanding of topic issues. Several factual errors. Assessment outcomes are not met.

No application of theory to practice.

No evidence of analysis.

Lacks evidence of reading/ investigation. Incomplete use of references. Most sources not cited.

Lack of structure and organisation. Limited use of materials. Limited communication skills. No management of group dynamics or awareness of time.

1-9%

(Fail)

No knowledge or understanding of topic issues. Many factual errors. Assessment outcomes are not met.

No application of theory to practice.

No evidence of analysis.

No supporting evidence.

No structure or organisation. No use of materials. Incoherent communication. No management of group dynamics or awareness of time.

0% Failure to present without prior permission granted. Evidence of academic malpractice as defined by Institutional Policy. Major breach of confidentiality. Evidence of unsafe/harmful or discriminatory practice or presentation of misinformation.

NB: All work submitted is expected to adhere to guidance regarding the recommended wordage. Failure to do so is likely to influence the final grade awarded.

18

TIMETABLE HUG 2125 Holy Cross

Time Day and Date Session Facilitator Venue

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 2nd October 2012

Introduction to the module

Jacqui Hitchen Holy Cross

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 9th October

Review: The Ageing Process

TBC

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 16th October

Why do we need an NSF?

Jacqui Hitchen

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 23rd October

Assignment Guide lines What is a seminar?

Jacqui Hitchen

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 30th October

Reading Week

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 6th November

Pharmacology and the Older Adult

Jacqui Hitchen

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 13th November

Review: Structure and Function of the Brain; Stroke and Stroke Rehabilitation

Jan Summers

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 20th November

Dementia and Confusion

Terry Kean

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 27th November

Diet and the Older Adult

Anne Coufopoulos

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 4th December

Diabetes and the Older Adult

TBC

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 11th December

Introduction to Social Policy

Sue English

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 18th December

Elder Abuse Jacqui Hitchen

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 8th January 2013

Summative Seminar Presentations

Jacqui Hitchen

19.00-21.00 Tuesday 15th January

Assignment Submission

JH Conference JH on Annual Leave Confirmed speakers