homelessness pulse report - hud exchange...participation in the pulse project has expanded. section...

Homelessness Pulse RePoRtFirst Quarter, 2011

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Office of Community Planning and Development

The Homelessness Pulse project is designed

to help the U.S. Department of Housing and

Urban Development (HUD) gain a better

understanding of how sheltered homelessness

is changing over time. At present, the data on

sheltered homelessness reported to HUD—

whether through the Annual Homeless Assess-

ment Report (AHAR) or through the home-

less services funding process—are collected

annually. These data are comprehensive and

can inform both public policy and local plans

to end homelessness, but they do not capture

“real time” changes in sheltered homelessness.

In an effort to collect and disseminate data

more frequently, HUD has partnered with

Continuums of Care (CoCs) nationwide to

collect data on a quarterly basis and provide an

early indication—a “pulse”—of how sheltered

homelessness is changing in these communi-

ties. Appendix A provides a list of the CoCs

that participated in the current Pulse report.

The up-to-date information reported in the

Homelessness Pulse report will help HUD

respond to events that may impinge on home-

lessness trends nationwide. The Pulse report

also helps HUD monitor progress against the

2010 Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End

Homelessness.

The Q1 2011 report uses information from 23

Continuums of Care that voluntarily submit

data on sheltered homelessness in their com-

munities, representing 361 counties and 422

cities.1 Many of the original communities were

specifically selected for participation because

they had a history of successful participation in

the AHAR. In future Pulse reports, communi-

ties can volunteer to participate as long as they

have good HMIS-data quality. The number of

participating communities has increased con-

siderably from previous reports and is expected

to grow with each passing report. Nonetheless,

the report does not provide a nationally repre-

sentative picture of homelessness and thus its

contents should be taken as suggestive—not

definitive—of how homelessness may be

changing.

IntRoductIon to tHe Homelessness Pulse RePoRt

First Quarter, 2011

1

maIn FIndIngs: Q1 2011 RePoRtParticipation in the Pulse Project has increased considerably. The Q1 2011 report in-cludes estimates of sheltered homelessness from 23 Continuums of Care (CoC) nation-wide, and the number of communities participating in future reports is expected to grow. With each passing report, the nation has a more comprehensive gauge—a “pulse”—of how trends in sheltered homeless are changing.

Quarterly Point-in-time estimates

Three-monTh Trend

Sheltered homelessness increased in 75 percent (15 out of 20) of the CoCs, driven mainly by increases in individual homelessness that occurred in 85 percent of participating CoCs. These increases are consistent with seasonal fluctuations in shelter use that have been described in the AHAR.

Ten-monTh Trend

Three out of the four CoCs with data over the past five quarters experienced an increase in sheltered homelessness. Changes in homelessness among each of the four CoCs were relatively large; each CoC experienced a change of at least 5 percent and three experi-enced a change of greater than 10 percent.

Trends by GeoGraphy:

The 3-month trends suggest that overall, individual, and family sheltered homelessness is increasing in the majority of CoCs in all three geographic types, although increases are most heavily concentrated among suburban CoCs. Among the four CoCs with 10-month trend data, the urban and suburban CoCs experienced a decline in homelessness, while the rural CoC experienced an increase.

Quarterly estimates of newly sheltered homeless

Slightly more than half of CoCs (55 percent) with 3-month trend data experienced an overall decline in newly sheltered homelessness between Q4 2010 and Q1 2011. Among the four CoCs with 12-month trend data, half experienced an increase in new client homelessness.

2

3-month trend

12-month trend

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

August 2010

(n=20)

6-month trend(n=21)

10-month trend(n=4)

September 2

010

October 2

7, 2010

November 2

010

December 2

010

January

26, 2011

March 31, 2

010

July 28, 2

010

3-month trend(n=20)

6-month trend(n=21)

9-month trend(n=4)

(n=4)

Jan. 1

, 2010 -

March 31, 2

010

April 1, 2

010 -

June 30, 2

010

July 1, 2

010 -

Sept. 30, 2

010

Oct. 1, 2

010 -

Dec. 31, 2

010

Jan. 1

, 2011 -

March 31, 2

011

3-month trend

12-month trend

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

August 2010

(n=20)

6-month trend(n=21)

10-month trend(n=4)

September 2

010

October 2

7, 2010

November 2

010

December 2

010

January

26, 2011

March 31, 2

010

July 28, 2

010

3-month trend(n=20)

6-month trend(n=21)

9-month trend(n=4)

(n=4)

Jan. 1

, 2010 -

March 31, 2

010

April 1, 2

010 -

June 30, 2

010

July 1, 2

010 -

Sept. 30, 2

010

Oct. 1, 2

010 -

Dec. 31, 2

010

Jan. 1

, 2011 -

March 31, 2

011

In This Report

Section 1 presents the quarterly Point-in-Time

(PIT) counts of sheltered homelessness for the

participating communities. The PIT counts

show the total number of sheltered persons on

a single night during the quarter.

The section also compares the most recent

quarterly PIT estimate to previous estimates

to gauge whether sheltered homelessness has

changed. As described in the Q4 2010 report,

the dates associated with the quarterly PIT

estimates were changed to align with the dates

in the AHAR. As a result of this change, the

trend periods will change with each successive

report until four, 3-month intervals (or quar-

ters) are re-established in the Q4 2011 report.

The Q1 2011 report provides three trend peri-

ods: 3-, 6-, and 10-month trends.2 Exhibit 1a

shows the three trend periods and associated

dates for the PIT counts. The report focuses on

Exhibit 1a: Range of Dates for the Quarterly PIT Count of Sheltered Homeless People

Exhibit 1b: Range of Dates for the Count of Newly Sheltered Homeless People

3

the latest 3-month trend, as the 3-month trends

provide an immediate indication of whether

homelessness is increasing or decreasing since

the last quarter. Changes in 3-month trends

may reflect the seasonality of shelter use—i.e.,

increases in shelter use during the winter and

declines during the summer. The report also

describes 6- and 10-month trends as they pro-

vide a longer timeframe for assessing changes

in homelessness. The 10-month changes are

particularly useful because these estimates es-

sentially account for the seasonality in shelter

use. The number of communities reporting the

3- and 6- month trends is larger than the num-

ber of communities in earlier quarters because

participation in the Pulse project has expanded.

Section 2 presents the counts of persons who

were not previously homeless but became

“newly” sheltered at any point throughout the

quarter. The section also describes the prior

living arrangements of newly sheltered people.

The changes made to the quarterly PIT counts

of all sheltered people are not carried through

to the estimates of newly sheltered home-

less people. Exhibit 1b shows the three trend

periods and associated dates for the counts of

newly sheltered homeless people.

1. tRends In tHe QuaRteRly PIt count oF sHelteRed Homelessness

Pulse communities report Point-in-Time (PIT)

counts of persons in emergency shelters and

transitional housing separately for persons

experiencing homelessness by themselves

and as members of families.3 The count was

generated through each CoC’s HMIS and was

adjusted statistically to account for residential

service providers that do not participate in the

community’s HMIS.4 The adjustment results in

an estimate of all sheltered homeless persons in

each community on the date of the PIT count.

The Q1 2011 PIT counts—conducted on Janu-

ary 26, 2010—are compared with previous

counts to describe both the percentage of com-

munities experiencing net changes in sheltered

homelessness and the size of the change. A

net increase (or decrease) in sheltered home-

lessness indicates that the number of sheltered

homeless persons increased (or decreased)

between the two quarterly PIT counts, though

some fluctuation may have occurred in-be-

tween the two dates. (Appendix B shows the

quarterly PIT counts for each CoC, and Appen-

dix C displays the percentage change across

the multiple trend periods.)

4

Changes in Quarterly Pit estimates of

sheltered homelessness

Exhibits 2, 3, and 4 show: (1) the percentage

of CoCs that experienced net increases and

decreases in sheltered homelessness during the

3-, 6-, and 10-month time periods; and (2) the

magnitude of the change by household type. In

these exhibits, each block represents a CoC.

Three-Month Trend in Sheltered Homelessness

M Sheltered homelessness increased in 75

percent (15 of 20) of the CoCs between

the last Wednesday in October and the

last Wednesday in January. Similar to the

three month trend reported in Q4 2010,

this trend was driven mostly by the in-

crease in individual homelessness that oc-

curred in 85 percent of the CoCs. Among

persons in families, slightly more than

half (55 percent) of CoCs experienced an

increase. These increases are consistent

with seasonal fluctuations in shelter use,

whereby people living on the streets or

other unsheltered locations seek shelter

due to cold or weather.

M The magnitude of change during the

3-month period was larger among CoCs

that experienced an increase in sheltered

homelessness than for those experiencing

a decrease. Among CoCs experiencing a

net increase, 53 percent (8 of 15) experi-

enced an increase of more than 10 per-

cent. Sixty percent of decreases in overall

homelessness were slight (2 percent or

less). However, within family homeless-

ness, almost half (44 percent) of sites with

a decrease in family homelessness experi-

enced a decline of greater than 10 percent.

Ten-Month Trend in Sheltered Homelessness

M Three of the four CoCs that participated

over the past four quarters experienced

a net increase in homelessness between

March 31, 2010 and January 26, 2011.

The change by household type varied

slightly, with three of four CoCs experi-

encing an increase in family homeless-

ness, and two of four experiencing in-

creases among individuals.

M Three of four CoCs experienced a change

of greater than 10 percent, and the remain-

ing CoC witnessed an increase between 5

and 10 percent.

Sheltered homelessness has increased in seventy-five percent of communities,

which occurred across both the three- and ten-month

trend periods.

5

Changes in Quarterly Pit estimates of sheltered homelessness by geograPhy

Communities participating in the Pulse project

are classified into three geographic types (see

Exhibit 5):

1. Principal city CoCs are communities

where the majority of the CoC’s popula-

tion lives within a principal city.

2. Suburban CoCs are communities where

fewer than 50 percent of residents live

within a principal city, but more than 70

percent of residents live within a Metro-

politan Statistical Area (MSA).

3. Rural CoCs are communities where at

least 30 percent of residents within the

CoC live outside of an MSA.

The 3-month trends suggest that overall, indi-

vidual, and family sheltered homelessness has

increased in the majority of CoCs located in

all three geographic types, although increases

are most heavily concentrated among subur-

ban CoCs. During the 10-month time period,

homelessness increased in the urban and subur-

ban CoCs, but decreased in the rural CoC.

Principal City CoCs

M Three-month trend: Four communities

with 3-month trend data were classified

as principal city CoCs. All four of these

CoCs experienced an increase in individu-

al homelessness, and three of four expe-

rienced an increase in family and overall

homelessness.

M Ten-month trend: One community with

10-month trend data was classified as a

principal city CoC. This CoC experienced

an increase in overall homelessness de-

spite a decline in individual homelessness.

Suburban CoCsM Three-month trend: Eleven communities

with 3-month trend data were catego-

rized as suburban CoCs. Most suburban

CoCs experienced an increase in sheltered

homelessness overall (82 percent) and

individual homelessness (91 percent), but

a decrease in family homelessness (55

percent).

M Ten-month trend: Two communities with

10-month trend data were categorized as

suburban CoCs. Both CoCs witnessed an

increase in homelessness among individu-

als and among families.

Rural CoCs

M Three-month trend: Five communities

with 3-month trend data were classified

as rural. Three of five rural CoCs experi-

enced an increase in individual and family

homelessness, while the remaining two

witnessed a decline in the count of both

household types.

M Ten-month trend: The one rural CoC with

10-month trend data experienced a decline

in homelessness.

6

Exhib

it 2: P

ercentag

e of P

ulse C

om

mu

nities Exp

eriencin

g N

et Ch

ang

es in To

tal Sheltered

Ho

meless P

op

ulatio

n*

*Percen

tages m

ay no

t sum

to 100 p

ercent d

ue to

rou

nd

ing

.

Distrib

utio

n o

f chan

ges in

ho

melessn

ess in select ran

ges b

y site, by p

eriod

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

Exhib

it 4 - Ind

ividu

als

20%

14%

5%15%

5%

5%

25%50%

5%5%

40%

52%14%

25%

10%

10%

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

15%

24%

5%5%5%

5%5%

25%

5%

50%

5%5%

55%

57%

25%

10%

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

15%19%

10%10%

10%

20%

5% 5%

25%50%

35%

38%24%

25%

5%5%

exhib

it 5 - family

85%15%

86%14%

50%50%

75%25%

81%19%

75%25%

55%45%

62%38%

75%25%

Decrease

Total Sh

eltered H

om

eless Po

pu

lation

Increase

3-Month

Trend

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

TrendSheltered

Ho

meless In

divid

uals

3-Month

Trend

Decrease

Increase

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

Trend

Decrease

Increase

Sheltered

Ho

meless Fam

ilies

3-Month

Trend

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

Trend

Exhib

it 3: P

ercentag

e of P

ulse C

om

mu

nities Exp

eriencin

g N

et Ch

ang

es in Sh

eltered H

om

eless Ind

ividu

als*

Exhib

it 4: P

ercentag

e of P

ulse C

om

mu

nities Exp

eriencin

g N

et Ch

ang

es in Sh

eltered H

om

eless Families

*

Distrib

utio

n o

f chan

ges in

ho

melessn

ess in select ran

ges b

y site, by p

eriod

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

Exhib

it 4 - Ind

ividu

als

20%

14%

5%15%

5%

5%

25%50%

5%5%

40%

52%14%

25%

10%

10%

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

15%

24%

5%5%5%

5%5%

25%

5%

50%

5%5%

55%

57%

25%

10%

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

15%19%

10%10%

10%

20%

5% 5%

25%50%

35%

38%24%

25%

5%5%

exhib

it 5 - family

85%15%

86%14%

50%50%

75%25%

81%19%

75%25%

55%45%

62%38%

75%25%

Decrease

Total Sh

eltered H

om

eless Po

pu

lation

Increase

3-Month

Trend

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

TrendSheltered

Ho

meless In

divid

uals

3-Month

Trend

Decrease

Increase

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

Trend

Decrease

Increase

Sheltered

Ho

meless Fam

ilies

3-Month

Trend

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

Trend

Distrib

utio

n o

f chan

ges in

ho

melessn

ess in select ran

ges b

y site, by p

eriod

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

Exhib

it 4 - Ind

ividu

als

20%

14%

5%15%

5%

5%

25%50%

5%5%

40%

52%14%

25%

10%

10%

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

15%

24%

5%5%5%

5%5%

25%

5%

50%

5%5%

55%

57%

25%

10%

-10.1% o

r greater

-5.1% to

-10%-2.1%

to -5%

Decreases

Increases

<0%

to -2%

0% to

2%2.1%

to 5%

5.1% to

10%10.1%

or g

reater

3-month

trend

6-month

trend

10-month

trend

15%19%

10%10%

10%

20%

5% 5%

25%50%

35%

38%24%

25%

5%5%

exhib

it 5 - family

85%15%

86%14%

50%50%

75%25%

81%19%

75%25%

55%45%

62%38%

75%25%

Decrease

Total Sh

eltered H

om

eless Po

pu

lation

Increase

3-Month

Trend

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

TrendSheltered

Ho

meless In

divid

uals

3-Month

Trend

Decrease

Increase

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

Trend

Decrease

Increase

Sheltered

Ho

meless Fam

ilies

3-Month

Trend

6-Month

Trend

10-Month

Trend

7

City CoCs

Tota

l Ho

mel

ess

Pop

ula

tio

n

Ho

mel

ess

Ind

ivid

ual

s

Ho

mel

ess

Fam

ilies

Tota

l Ho

mel

ess

Pop

ula

tio

n

Ho

mel

ess

Ind

ivid

ual

s

Ho

mel

ess

Fam

ilies

Tota

l Ho

mel

ess

Pop

ula

tio

n

Ho

mel

ess

Ind

ivid

ual

s

Ho

mel

ess

Fam

ilies

Suburban CoCs Rural CoCsPe

rcen

t wit

h in

crea

sing

hom

eles

snes

s

Perc

ent w

ith

decr

easi

ngho

mel

essn

ess

Perc

ent w

ith

incr

easi

ngho

mel

essn

ess

Perc

ent w

ith

decr

easi

ngho

mel

essn

ess

3-MonthTrend

6-MonthTrend

10-MonthTrend

Perc

ent w

ith

incr

easi

ngho

mel

essn

ess

Perc

ent w

ith

decr

easi

ngho

mel

essn

ess

82%

18%

9%

91%

9%40%

9%

45%

55%40%

20%

100%

40%

20%

100%

20%

100%

100%

80%

20%

100%

75%

25%

40%

75%

25%

60% 60%

40%

100% 100%100%100%100%

91%

55%

45%60%60% 60%

80%80% 80%91%

Geographic Area

(n=11) (n=5)(n=4)

(n=11) (n=5)(n=5)

(n=2) (n=1)(n=1)

Exhibit 5: Percentage of Pulse Communities Experiencing Changes in

Sheltered Homeless by Geography and Household Type

8

A newly sheltered homeless person is someone

who:

• �Used an emergency shelter or transitional

housing program during the quarter; and

• �Had not received any residential homeless

services in the 15 months prior to entering

shelter.5

These data provide an indication of how many

individuals and persons in families experienced

sheltered homelessness for the first time dur-

ing the quarter. Over time, this information

may suggest whether homelessness prevention

programs are effectively stemming the flow

of persons into the shelter system and divert-

ing persons at-risk of becoming homeless into

stable living situations.

Trends in newly sheltered homelessness were

not affected by the shifts in the dates associ-

ated with the quarterly PIT counts. Instead,

the trends in this section are based on changes

between the four annual quarters. This section

provides three types of trend estimates:

1. CoCs that experienced net changes in

newly sheltered homelessness over the

past four quarters, by household type;

2. Changes in the household composition of

newly sheltered homeless persons; and

3. Changes in the prior living situation of

newly sheltered homeless persons.

Changes in the Quarterly estimates of newly sheltered

homeless Persons

Exhibit 6 presents the quarterly estimates of

newly sheltered homeless persons, showing

that:

M Three-month trend: Slightly more than

half of CoCs (55 percent) with 3-month

trend data experienced an overall decline

in newly sheltered homelessness between

Q4 2010 and Q1 2011. The declines were

often seen in only one of the two house-

hold types. When broken down by family

type, only half of the 20 CoCs experi-

enced a decline among newly homeless

families and 40 percent experienced a de-

cline among newly homeless individuals.

M Twelve-month trend: Two of the four CoCs

with 12-month trend data experienced a

decline in newly sheltered homelessness

overall.

2. estImates oF newly sHelteRed Homeless PeRsons

9

household tyPe and ComPosition of newly

sheltered homeless Persons

Household type and composition are based on

the household’s status on the first day of entry

into the shelter system. Because some com-

munities participating in the Pulse project are

much larger than others and thus would heav-

ily influence the aggregated results, the data

presented in the exhibit are an average of the

percentages for each community. For example,

if individual persons represent 50, 60, 70, and

80 percent of the newly sheltered population

in four communities, the average is equal to

65 percent. This report includes information

on 23 communities for Q1 2010, 21 communi-

ties for Q4 2010, 25 communities for Q3 2010,

and 7 communities for the prior quarters. The

results are presented in Exhibits 7 and 8.

M Three-month trend: The proportion of

newly sheltered persons in families de-

creased over the past quarter by two per-

cent, to 32 percent of the newly sheltered

homeless population. In Q1 2011, indi-

viduals represented 68 percent of newly

sheltered homeless persons.

Among newly sheltered individuals in Q1

2011, slightly more than two thirds (68 per-

cent) were men, a slight decline of 1 percent-

age point from Q4 2010. Women made up 28

percent of the individual population, which is

the same as the prior quarter. The remaining

4 percent in Q1 were unaccompanied youth

(including parenting youth), an increase of

less than 1 percentage point. The composition

of newly sheltered families remained stable

during the 3-month period, with children mak-

ing up slightly under two-thirds of people in

families.

M Twelve-month trend: The proportion of

newly sheltered persons who are in fami-

lies in Q1 2011 was the same as Q1 2010;

individuals made up 68 percent and per-

sons in families made up 32 percent of the

newly homeless client population.

Percentage of Communities Experiencing Net Changes in Newly Sheltered Homelessness by Household Type

Decrease

Total Newly Sheltered Homeless Population

45%55%

48%52%

50%50%

50% 50%

Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase

3 MonthTrend

6 MonthTrend

9 MonthTrend

12 MonthTrend

Newly Sheltered Homeless FamiliesNewly Sheltered Homeless Individuals

60%40%

48%52%

25%75%

50%50%

50%50%

29%71%

50%

75% 25%

50%

(n=20)

(n=21)

(n=4)

(n=4)

3 MonthTrend

6 MonthTrend

9 MonthTrend

12 MonthTrend

(n=20)

(n=21)

(n=4)

(n=4)

3 MonthTrend

6 MonthTrend

9 MonthTrend

12 MonthTrend

(n=20)

(n=21)

(n=4)

(n=4)

Exhibit 6: Percentage of Communities Experiencing Net Changes in Newly Sheltered

Homelessness by Household Type

10

Q42010

Q12011

Q32010

64% Individual Persons 36% Persons in families



68%

Adult females Adult males

28%

Unaccompaniedyouth

4%

Composition of Individuals

69% 64%36%

Adult females Adult males Adults in families Children in families

27%

Unaccompaniedyouth

3%

Composition of Individuals Composition of Families

64%36%

Adults in families Children in families

Composition of Families

65% 63%37%


30%

Unaccompaniedyouth

4%


Q42010

Q32010

Q12011

Q22010


Q12010


71% 62%38%


28%

Unaccompaniedyouth

1%


75% 64%36%


23%

Unaccompaniedyouth

3%


Q22010

Q12010

Exhibit 7: Household Type of Newly Sheltered Persons*

Exhibit 8: Household Composition of Newly Sheltered Persons by Household Type*

*Percentages may not sum to 100 percent due to rounding.

11

Similar to the three-month trend, the composi-

tion of families remained relatively unchanged

during the 12-month period. However, among

individuals, the proportion of individual adult

men declined from 75 to 68 percent, while the

proportion of individual adult women in-

creased by 5 percentage points and the propor-

tion of unaccompanied youth increased by one

percentage point.

Prior living situation of newly sheltered homeless Persons

Communities participating in the Pulse project

reported on the living situation of persons just

prior to entering the shelter system (Exhibit

9). The various housing situations are grouped

into four categories:

1. “Housing”—This category accounts for

people who were in an owned housing

unit, a rental unit, or staying with family

or friends. It also includes a very small

proportion of people in permanent sup-

portive housing.

2. Institutional Settings—This category in-

cludes people who were in several differ-

ent types of institutional facilities: psychi-

atric facilities, substance abuse centers,

hospitals, jails, prisons, juvenile detention

centers, and foster care.

3. Place not meant for human habitation—

This category includes people who were

living on the streets, in cars, in abandoned

buildings, or other locations not intended

for habitation. People in this category

are counted as newly sheltered homeless

because they have not used the shelter

system in the 15 months prior to program

entry.

4. Other—This category captures people

who were in a hotel, motel, or other type

of living arrangement.

Prior Living Situation of Newly Sheltered Homeless Persons by Household Type

Self-reported living situation prior to homelessness

2%

Owned housing

41%

Family or friends

11%

Rental housing

14%

Institutional settings

11%

Other situations

10%

Other situations

21%

Place not meant forhuman habitation


All housing (54%)

1%

Owned housing Family or friends

13%

Rental housing

13%


22%

All housing (54%)

Q42010

1%

Owned housing

43%

Family or friends

11%

Rental housing

16%


9%

Other situations

20%


All housing (55%)

Q12011

Q32010

40%

Exhibit 9: Prior Living Situation of Newly Sheltered Homeless Persons by

Household Type*

*Percentages may not sum to 100 percent due to rounding.

12

1. Cities are defined as places with 10,000 or more people.2. The estimate from Q2 2010, which was conducted on June 30, 2010, was omitted from this report because there was only one

month between the Q2 end-of-the-quarter PIT count to the Q3 seasonal midpoint PIT count.3. In the Pulse project, a family is a household composed of at least one adult (age 18 or older) and one child (age 17 or younger).

This definition is consistent with the AHAR. An unaccompanied person under the age of 18 is an individual. Parenting youth and their children are counted as individuals, not as a family, because an adult is not present.

4. The Pulse project uses the AHAR methodology for adjusting the PIT estimates to account for service providers that do not partici-pate in the respective community’s HMIS. See Appendix B in the 2009 AHAR for a detailed explanation of the methodology.

5. Although the majority of service providers participate in HMIS nationwide, some providers (especially faith-based providers) may not participate in their community’s HMIS. As a result, it is possible for a person to be considered “new” even though he or she received residential services within the past 15 months if the person used a service provider that does not participate in HMIS or was served in shelter outside of the CoC. In the Q1 2011 report, 10 percent of newly homeless clients self-reported that their prior living arrangement was an emergency shelter or transitional housing program even though the community’s HMIS did not have a record for them. The report removes these from the counts of newly sheltered homeless persons.

Slightly more than half of newly sheltered

homeless persons (54 percent) came from a

housed situation. Of these, 76 percent came

from staying with family or friends. Few

newly homeless persons came directly from an

apartment or house that they owned (2 per-

cent). One in 7 newly homeless clients (14 per-

cent) came from institutional settings, and the

remaining 32 percent came from other types of

situations, mostly from a place not meant for

human habitation. The prior living situation

of newly homeless people remained relatively

stable between Q3 and Q4; all changes were

within 2 percentage points.

13

AZ-500

AZ-502

CA-500

CA-505

CA-609

CT-510

DC-500

GA-506

GA-507

IA-501

IA-502

ID-501

IL-511

KY-500

LA-502

MD-600

MD-601

MI-501

MI-504

MI-508

MI-519

NY-600

OH-500

OH-502

VA-500

WI-500

WI-501

WI-502

WI-503

West

West

West

West

West

Northeast

South

South

South

Midwest

Midwest

West

Midwest

South

South

South

South

Midwest

Midwest

Midwest

Midwest

Northeast

Midwest

Midwest

South

Midwest

Midwest

Midwest

Midwest

Rural

Principal City

Principal City

Suburban

Suburban

Suburban

Principal City

Suburban

Principal City

Rural

Principal City

Rural

Suburban

Rural

Suburban

Suburban

Suburban

Principal City

Suburban

Principal City

Suburban

Principal City

Suburban

Suburban

Suburban

Rural

Principal City

Suburban

Suburban

Arizona Balance of State CoC

Phoenix/Mesa/Maricopa County Regional CoC

San Jose/Santa Clara City & County CoC

Richmond/Contra Costa County CoC

San Bernardino City & County CoC

Bristol CoC

District of Columbia CoC

Marietta/Cobb County CoC

Savannah/Chatham County CoC

Iowa Balance of State CoC

Des Moines/Polk County CoC

Idaho Balance of State CoC

Cook County CoC

Kentucky Balance of State CoC

Shreveport/Bossier/Northwest CoC

Prince George's County CoC

Montgomery County CoC

Detroit CoC

Pontiac/Royal Oak/Oakland County CoC

Lansing/East Lansing/Ingham County CoC

Holland/Ottawa County CoC

New York City CoC

Cincinnati/Hamilton County CoC

Cleveland/Cuyahoga County CoC

Richmond/Henrico, Chesterfield, Hanover Counties CoC

Wisconsin Balance of State CoC

Milwaukee City & County CoC

Racine City & County CoC

Madison/Dane County CoC

CoC Full NameCoC

CoCs Participating in the Q1 2011 Pulse Report

Geography Category Usa

ble

data

for Q

1, 2

010

Usa

ble

data

for Q

2, 2

010

Usa

ble

data

for Q

3, 2

010

Usa

ble

data

for Q

4, 2

010

Usa

ble

data

for Q

1, 2

011

U.S. Census Region

Appendix A

14

Change inindividual homelessness

Change infamily homelessness

Change intotal homelessness

Phoenix/Mesa/Maricopa County District of Columbia

Bridgeport/Stratford/Fairfield Kentucky Balance of State

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,002

3,791

3,324 3,293 3,336

1,622

1,7021,533 1,541 1,561

1,381

2,0891,791 1,753 1,775

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

413437

540

447 450

246

312

371

306 310

168

125

168142 139

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

53955646

60725845

5638

31913398

3606 37063466

2205 22482466

2139 2172

0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

2043 2043

17741616 1639

634 634

855745 790

1409 1409

920 871 849

Appendix B: Quarterly PIT Counts by CoC

0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

752801 801

271 290 295

480511 506

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,293 3,3363,089

2,938

1,753 1,775 1,653 1,573

1,541 1,561 1,436 1,365

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Phoenix/Mesa/Maricopa County CoC

0

188

375

563

750

938

1,125

1,313

1,5001,487

736

751

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

San Jose/Santa Clare City and County CoC

0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

827 856 839

354 344308

473512 530

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

491

562

657

345 351398

146

211259

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

8

15

23

30

38

45

53

60

56

22

34

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Bristol CoC

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

5,845 5,638 5,733 5,8806,278

2,139 2,172 2,135 2,2842,675

3,7063,466 3,597 3,597 3,604

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

290 281295

149 146

143142 136

153

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,4411,513 1,507

832899

844

608 613 663

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

769 759

860

221 219262

548 540599

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

624660

724

390 404 429

234 257294

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

1,616 1,639 1,665 1,719

1,288871 849 912 900

676

745 790 753 820

613

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

572543

208172

364 371

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

63

125

188

250

313

375

438

500

400 406

460

336 340 333

64 66

127

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

576 569

765

338 336 322

238 233

443

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,086

2,738

622 505

2,4642,233

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Detroit CoC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

370

160

210

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

371 369 367

137 131

74

234 238

293

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

253

219 222

148 143121

105

76101

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

6,250

12,500

18,750

25,000

31,250

37,500

43,750

50,000

47,863 46,712

31,644 30,326

16,219 16,386

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

New York City CoC

0

138

275

413

550

688

825

963

1,100

9261001

1,092

364432

471562 569

621

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,373 1,456

1,906

2,4152,282

448 392 439 505 469

9261,064

1,466

1,910 1,813

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

796720

767803

896

192156

204 208 218

604564 563

596

677

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,975 2,021

2,383

1,107 1,024

1,333

867996 1,049

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

163

325

488

650

813

975

1,138

1,300

1,024 1,057

1,231

463 442547

561615

683

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

213 211225

64 57 67

149 154 158

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

390

512

601

190239

282200

273319

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

843

392

451

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Cook County CoC

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

507

191

316

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Savannah/Chatham CoC

15






June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,002

3,791

3,324 3,293 3,336

1,622

1,7021,533 1,541 1,561

1,381

2,0891,791 1,753 1,775

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

413437

540

447 450

246

312

371

306 310

168

125

168142 139

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

53955646

60725845

5638

31913398

3606 37063466

2205 22482466

2139 2172

0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

2043 2043

17741616 1639

634 634

855745 790

1409 1409

920 871 849


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

752801 801

271 290 295

480511 506

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,293 3,3363,089

2,938

1,753 1,775 1,653 1,573

1,541 1,561 1,436 1,365

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

188

375

563

750

938

1,125

1,313

1,5001,487

736

751

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

827 856 839

354 344308

473512 530

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

491

562

657

345 351398

146

211259

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

8

15

23

30

38

45

53

60

56

22

34

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Bristol CoC

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

5,845 5,638 5,733 5,8806,278

2,139 2,172 2,135 2,2842,675

3,7063,466 3,597 3,597 3,604

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

290 281295

149 146

143142 136

153

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,4411,513 1,507

832899

844

608 613 663

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

769 759

860

221 219262

548 540599

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

624660

724

390 404 429

234 257294

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

1,616 1,639 1,665 1,719

1,288871 849 912 900

676

745 790 753 820

613

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

572543

208172

364 371

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

63

125

188

250

313

375

438

500

400 406

460

336 340 333

64 66

127

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

576 569

765

338 336 322

238 233

443

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,086

2,738

622 505

2,4642,233

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Detroit CoC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

370

160

210

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

371 369 367

137 131

74

234 238

293

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

253

219 222

148 143121

105

76101

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

6,250

12,500

18,750

25,000

31,250

37,500

43,750

50,000

47,863 46,712

31,644 30,326

16,219 16,386

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

New York City CoC

0

138

275

413

550

688

825

963

1,100

9261001

1,092

364432

471562 569

621

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,373 1,456

1,906

2,4152,282

448 392 439 505 469

9261,064

1,466

1,910 1,813

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

796720

767803

896

192156

204 208 218

604564 563

596

677

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,975 2,021

2,383

1,107 1,024

1,333

867996 1,049

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

163

325

488

650

813

975

1,138

1,300

1,024 1,057

1,231

463 442547

561615

683

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

213 211225

64 57 67

149 154 158

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

390

512

601

190239

282200

273319

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

843

392

451

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Cook County CoC

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

507

191

316

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


16






June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,002

3,791

3,324 3,293 3,336

1,622

1,7021,533 1,541 1,561

1,381

2,0891,791 1,753 1,775

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

413437

540

447 450

246

312

371

306 310

168

125

168142 139

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

53955646

60725845

5638

31913398

3606 37063466

2205 22482466

2139 2172

0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

2043 2043

17741616 1639

634 634

855745 790

1409 1409

920 871 849


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

752801 801

271 290 295

480511 506

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,293 3,3363,089

2,938

1,753 1,775 1,653 1,573

1,541 1,561 1,436 1,365

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

188

375

563

750

938

1,125

1,313

1,5001,487

736

751

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

827 856 839

354 344308

473512 530

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

491

562

657

345 351398

146

211259

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

8

15

23

30

38

45

53

60

56

22

34

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Bristol CoC

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

5,845 5,638 5,733 5,8806,278

2,139 2,172 2,135 2,2842,675

3,7063,466 3,597 3,597 3,604

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

290 281295

149 146

143142 136

153

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,4411,513 1,507

832899

844

608 613 663

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

769 759

860

221 219262

548 540599

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

624660

724

390 404 429

234 257294

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

1,616 1,639 1,665 1,719

1,288871 849 912 900

676

745 790 753 820

613

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

572543

208172

364 371

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

63

125

188

250

313

375

438

500

400 406

460

336 340 333

64 66

127

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

576 569

765

338 336 322

238 233

443

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,086

2,738

622 505

2,4642,233

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Detroit CoC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

370

160

210

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

371 369 367

137 131

74

234 238

293

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

253

219 222

148 143121

105

76101

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

6,250

12,500

18,750

25,000

31,250

37,500

43,750

50,000

47,863 46,712

31,644 30,326

16,219 16,386

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

New York City CoC

0

138

275

413

550

688

825

963

1,100

9261001

1,092

364432

471562 569

621

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,373 1,456

1,906

2,4152,282

448 392 439 505 469

9261,064

1,466

1,910 1,813

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

796720

767803

896

192156

204 208 218

604564 563

596

677

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,975 2,021

2,383

1,107 1,024

1,333

867996 1,049

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

163

325

488

650

813

975

1,138

1,300

1,024 1,057

1,231

463 442547

561615

683

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

213 211225

64 57 67

149 154 158

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

390

512

601

190239

282200

273319

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

843

392

451

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Cook County CoC

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

507

191

316

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


17






June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,002

3,791

3,324 3,293 3,336

1,622

1,7021,533 1,541 1,561

1,381

2,0891,791 1,753 1,775

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

413437

540

447 450

246

312

371

306 310

168

125

168142 139

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

53955646

60725845

5638

31913398

3606 37063466

2205 22482466

2139 2172

0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

2043 2043

17741616 1639

634 634

855745 790

1409 1409

920 871 849


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

752801 801

271 290 295

480511 506

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,293 3,3363,089

2,938

1,753 1,775 1,653 1,573

1,541 1,561 1,436 1,365

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

188

375

563

750

938

1,125

1,313

1,5001,487

736

751

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

827 856 839

354 344308

473512 530

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

491

562

657

345 351398

146

211259

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

8

15

23

30

38

45

53

60

56

22

34

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Bristol CoC

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

5,845 5,638 5,733 5,8806,278

2,139 2,172 2,135 2,2842,675

3,7063,466 3,597 3,597 3,604

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

290 281295

149 146

143142 136

153

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,4411,513 1,507

832899

844

608 613 663

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

769 759

860

221 219262

548 540599

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

624660

724

390 404 429

234 257294

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

1,616 1,639 1,665 1,719

1,288871 849 912 900

676

745 790 753 820

613

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

572543

208172

364 371

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

63

125

188

250

313

375

438

500

400 406

460

336 340 333

64 66

127

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

576 569

765

338 336 322

238 233

443

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,086

2,738

622 505

2,4642,233

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Detroit CoC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

370

160

210

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

371 369 367

137 131

74

234 238

293

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

253

219 222

148 143121

105

76101

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

6,250

12,500

18,750

25,000

31,250

37,500

43,750

50,000

47,863 46,712

31,644 30,326

16,219 16,386

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

New York City CoC

0

138

275

413

550

688

825

963

1,100

9261001

1,092

364432

471562 569

621

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,373 1,456

1,906

2,4152,282

448 392 439 505 469

9261,064

1,466

1,910 1,813

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

796720

767803

896

192156

204 208 218

604564 563

596

677

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,975 2,021

2,383

1,107 1,024

1,333

867996 1,049

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

163

325

488

650

813

975

1,138

1,300

1,024 1,057

1,231

463 442547

561615

683

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

213 211225

64 57 67

149 154 158

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

390

512

601

190239

282200

273319

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

843

392

451

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Cook County CoC

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

507

191

316

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


18






June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,002

3,791

3,324 3,293 3,336

1,622

1,7021,533 1,541 1,561

1,381

2,0891,791 1,753 1,775

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

413437

540

447 450

246

312

371

306 310

168

125

168142 139

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

53955646

60725845

5638

31913398

3606 37063466

2205 22482466

2139 2172

0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

2043 2043

17741616 1639

634 634

855745 790

1409 1409

920 871 849


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

752801 801

271 290 295

480511 506

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,293 3,3363,089

2,938

1,753 1,775 1,653 1,573

1,541 1,561 1,436 1,365

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

188

375

563

750

938

1,125

1,313

1,5001,487

736

751

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

827 856 839

354 344308

473512 530

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

491

562

657

345 351398

146

211259

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

8

15

23

30

38

45

53

60

56

22

34

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Bristol CoC

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

5,845 5,638 5,733 5,8806,278

2,139 2,172 2,135 2,2842,675

3,7063,466 3,597 3,597 3,604

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

290 281295

149 146

143142 136

153

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,4411,513 1,507

832899

844

608 613 663

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

769 759

860

221 219262

548 540599

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

624660

724

390 404 429

234 257294

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

1,616 1,639 1,665 1,719

1,288871 849 912 900

676

745 790 753 820

613

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

572543

208172

364 371

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

63

125

188

250

313

375

438

500

400 406

460

336 340 333

64 66

127

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

576 569

765

338 336 322

238 233

443

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,086

2,738

622 505

2,4642,233

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Detroit CoC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

370

160

210

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

371 369 367

137 131

74

234 238

293

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

253

219 222

148 143121

105

76101

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

6,250

12,500

18,750

25,000

31,250

37,500

43,750

50,000

47,863 46,712

31,644 30,326

16,219 16,386

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

New York City CoC

0

138

275

413

550

688

825

963

1,100

9261001

1,092

364432

471562 569

621

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,373 1,456

1,906

2,4152,282

448 392 439 505 469

9261,064

1,466

1,910 1,813

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

796720

767803

896

192156

204 208 218

604564 563

596

677

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,975 2,021

2,383

1,107 1,024

1,333

867996 1,049

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

163

325

488

650

813

975

1,138

1,300

1,024 1,057

1,231

463 442547

561615

683

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

213 211225

64 57 67

149 154 158

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

390

512

601

190239

282200

273319

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

843

392

451

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Cook County CoC

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

507

191

316

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


19






June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,002

3,791

3,324 3,293 3,336

1,622

1,7021,533 1,541 1,561

1,381

2,0891,791 1,753 1,775

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

413437

540

447 450

246

312

371

306 310

168

125

168142 139

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

53955646

60725845

5638

31913398

3606 37063466

2205 22482466

2139 2172

0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

2043 2043

17741616 1639

634 634

855745 790

1409 1409

920 871 849


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

752801 801

271 290 295

480511 506

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,293 3,3363,089

2,938

1,753 1,775 1,653 1,573

1,541 1,561 1,436 1,365

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

188

375

563

750

938

1,125

1,313

1,5001,487

736

751

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

827 856 839

354 344308

473512 530

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

491

562

657

345 351398

146

211259

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

8

15

23

30

38

45

53

60

56

22

34

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Bristol CoC

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

5,845 5,638 5,733 5,8806,278

2,139 2,172 2,135 2,2842,675

3,7063,466 3,597 3,597 3,604

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

290 281295

149 146

143142 136

153

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,4411,513 1,507

832899

844

608 613 663

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

769 759

860

221 219262

548 540599

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

624660

724

390 404 429

234 257294

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

1,616 1,639 1,665 1,719

1,288871 849 912 900

676

745 790 753 820

613

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

572543

208172

364 371

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

63

125

188

250

313

375

438

500

400 406

460

336 340 333

64 66

127

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

576 569

765

338 336 322

238 233

443

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,086

2,738

622 505

2,4642,233

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Detroit CoC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

370

160

210

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

371 369 367

137 131

74

234 238

293

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

253

219 222

148 143121

105

76101

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

6,250

12,500

18,750

25,000

31,250

37,500

43,750

50,000

47,863 46,712

31,644 30,326

16,219 16,386

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

New York City CoC

0

138

275

413

550

688

825

963

1,100

9261001

1,092

364432

471562 569

621

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,373 1,456

1,906

2,4152,282

448 392 439 505 469

9261,064

1,466

1,910 1,813

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

796720

767803

896

192156

204 208 218

604564 563

596

677

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,975 2,021

2,383

1,107 1,024

1,333

867996 1,049

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

163

325

488

650

813

975

1,138

1,300

1,024 1,057

1,231

463 442547

561615

683

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

213 211225

64 57 67

149 154 158

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

390

512

601

190239

282200

273319

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

843

392

451

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Cook County CoC

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

507

191

316

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


20






June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,002

3,791

3,324 3,293 3,336

1,622

1,7021,533 1,541 1,561

1,381

2,0891,791 1,753 1,775

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

413437

540

447 450

246

312

371

306 310

168

125

168142 139

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

53955646

60725845

5638

31913398

3606 37063466

2205 22482466

2139 2172

0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

2043 2043

17741616 1639

634 634

855745 790

1409 1409

920 871 849


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

752801 801

271 290 295

480511 506

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,293 3,3363,089

2,938

1,753 1,775 1,653 1,573

1,541 1,561 1,436 1,365

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

188

375

563

750

938

1,125

1,313

1,5001,487

736

751

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

827 856 839

354 344308

473512 530

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

491

562

657

345 351398

146

211259

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

8

15

23

30

38

45

53

60

56

22

34

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Bristol CoC

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

5,845 5,638 5,733 5,8806,278

2,139 2,172 2,135 2,2842,675

3,7063,466 3,597 3,597 3,604

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

290 281295

149 146

143142 136

153

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,4411,513 1,507

832899

844

608 613 663

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

769 759

860

221 219262

548 540599

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

624660

724

390 404 429

234 257294

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

1,616 1,639 1,665 1,719

1,288871 849 912 900

676

745 790 753 820

613

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

572543

208172

364 371

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

63

125

188

250

313

375

438

500

400 406

460

336 340 333

64 66

127

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

576 569

765

338 336 322

238 233

443

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,086

2,738

622 505

2,4642,233

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Detroit CoC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

370

160

210

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

371 369 367

137 131

74

234 238

293

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

253

219 222

148 143121

105

76101

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

6,250

12,500

18,750

25,000

31,250

37,500

43,750

50,000

47,863 46,712

31,644 30,326

16,219 16,386

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

New York City CoC

0

138

275

413

550

688

825

963

1,100

9261001

1,092

364432

471562 569

621

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,373 1,456

1,906

2,4152,282

448 392 439 505 469

9261,064

1,466

1,910 1,813

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

796720

767803

896

192156

204 208 218

604564 563

596

677

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,975 2,021

2,383

1,107 1,024

1,333

867996 1,049

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

163

325

488

650

813

975

1,138

1,300

1,024 1,057

1,231

463 442547

561615

683

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

213 211225

64 57 67

149 154 158

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

390

512

601

190239

282200

273319

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

843

392

451

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Cook County CoC

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

507

191

316

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


21






June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

June 2010

June 2009

March 2010

Dec. 200

9

Sep. 200

9

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,002

3,791

3,324 3,293 3,336

1,622

1,7021,533 1,541 1,561

1,381

2,0891,791 1,753 1,775

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

413437

540

447 450

246

312

371

306 310

168

125

168142 139

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

53955646

60725845

5638

31913398

3606 37063466

2205 22482466

2139 2172

0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

2043 2043

17741616 1639

634 634

855745 790

1409 1409

920 871 849


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

752801 801

271 290 295

480511 506

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,293 3,3363,089

2,938

1,753 1,775 1,653 1,573

1,541 1,561 1,436 1,365

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

188

375

563

750

938

1,125

1,313

1,5001,487

736

751

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

827 856 839

354 344308

473512 530

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

491

562

657

345 351398

146

211259

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

8

15

23

30

38

45

53

60

56

22

34

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Bristol CoC

0

875

1,750

2,625

3,500

4,375

5,250

6,125

7,000

5,845 5,638 5,733 5,8806,278

2,139 2,172 2,135 2,2842,675

3,7063,466 3,597 3,597 3,604

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

290 281295

149 146

143142 136

153

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,4411,513 1,507

832899

844

608 613 663

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

769 759

860

221 219262

548 540599

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

624660

724

390 404 429

234 257294

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

1,616 1,639 1,665 1,719

1,288871 849 912 900

676

745 790 753 820

613

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

572543

208172

364 371

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

63

125

188

250

313

375

438

500

400 406

460

336 340 333

64 66

127

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

576 569

765

338 336 322

238 233

443

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

3,086

2,738

622 505

2,4642,233

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Detroit CoC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

370

160

210

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

371 369 367

137 131

74

234 238

293

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

253

219 222

148 143121

105

76101

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

6,250

12,500

18,750

25,000

31,250

37,500

43,750

50,000

47,863 46,712

31,644 30,326

16,219 16,386

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

New York City CoC

0

138

275

413

550

688

825

963

1,100

9261001

1,092

364432

471562 569

621

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,373 1,456

1,906

2,4152,282

448 392 439 505 469

9261,064

1,466

1,910 1,813

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

796720

767803

896

192156

204 208 218

604564 563

596

677

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

375

750

1,125

1,500

1,875

2,250

2,625

3,000

1,975 2,021

2,383

1,107 1,024

1,333

867996 1,049

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

163

325

488

650

813

975

1,138

1,300

1,024 1,057

1,231

463 442547

561615

683

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

38

75

113

150

188

225

263

300

213 211225

64 57 67

149 154 158

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

88

175

263

350

438

525

613

700

390

512

601

190239

282200

273319

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


0

113

225

338

450

563

675

788

900

843

392

451

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010

Cook County CoC

0

75

150

225

300

375

450

525

600

507

191

316

Oct. 201

0

Jan. 201

1

July 20

10

June 2010

March 2010


22

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

3 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

Positive p

ercentag

e chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness

Neg

ative percen

tage ch

ang

e into

tal ho

melessn

ess

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

Detro

it Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

6 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

9 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

12

mo

nth

chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness b

y site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

Ap

pen

dix C

: Percen

tage C

han

ge in

the Q

uarterly P

IT Co

un

ts by C

oC

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

3 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

Positive p

ercentag

e chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness

Neg

ative percen

tage ch

ang

e into

tal ho

melessn

ess

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

Detro

it Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

6 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

9 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

12

mo

nth

chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness b

y site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%

50

%6

0%

50

%6

0%

-20

%-3

0%

-40

%

-50

%-6

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Arizo

na B

alance

of State

Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

De

s Mo

ine

s/Po

lk Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance

of State

Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e C

ou

nty C

oC

Marie

tta/Co

bb

Co

un

ty Co

C

Milw

auke

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery C

ou

nty C

oC

Prin

ce G

eo

rge

's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racin

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/Co

ntra C

osta C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

San B

ern

ardin

o C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

3 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

Po

sitive p

erce

ntag

e ch

ang

e in

total h

om

ele

ssne

ss

Ne

gative

pe

rcen

tage

chan

ge

into

tal ho

me

lessn

ess

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%

50

%6

0%

50

%6

0%

-20

%-3

0%

-40

%

-50

%-6

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Arizo

na B

alance

of State

Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

De

s Mo

ine

s/Po

lk Co

un

ty Co

C

De

troit C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance

of State

Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e C

ou

nty C

oC

Marie

tta/Co

bb

Co

un

ty Co

C

Milw

auke

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery C

ou

nty C

oC

Prin

ce G

eo

rge

's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racin

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/Co

ntra C

osta C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

San B

ern

ardin

o C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

6 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

9 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

12

mo

nth

cha

ng

e in

tota

l ho

me

lessn

ess b

y site

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

23

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

3 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

Positive p

ercentag

e chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness

Neg

ative percen

tage ch

ang

e into

tal ho

melessn

ess

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

Detro

it Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

6 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

9 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

12

mo

nth

chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness b

y site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

Ap

pen

dix C

: Percen

tage C

han

ge in

the Q

uarterly P

IT Co

un

ts by C

oC

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

3 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

Positive p

ercentag

e chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness

Neg

ative percen

tage ch

ang

e into

tal ho

melessn

ess

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

Detro

it Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

6 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

9 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

12

mo

nth

chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness b

y site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%

50

%6

0%

50

%6

0%

-20

%-3

0%

-40

%

-50

%-6

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Arizo

na B

alance

of State

Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

De

s Mo

ine

s/Po

lk Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance

of State

Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e C

ou

nty C

oC

Marie

tta/Co

bb

Co

un

ty Co

C

Milw

auke

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery C

ou

nty C

oC

Prin

ce G

eo

rge

's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racin

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/Co

ntra C

osta C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

San B

ern

ardin

o C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

3 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

Po

sitive p

erce

ntag

e ch

ang

e in

total h

om

ele

ssne

ss

Ne

gative

pe

rcen

tage

chan

ge

into

tal ho

me

lessn

ess

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%

50

%6

0%

50

%6

0%

-20

%-3

0%

-40

%

-50

%-6

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Arizo

na B

alance

of State

Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

De

s Mo

ine

s/Po

lk Co

un

ty Co

C

De

troit C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance

of State

Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e C

ou

nty C

oC

Marie

tta/Co

bb

Co

un

ty Co

C

Milw

auke

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery C

ou

nty C

oC

Prin

ce G

eo

rge

's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racin

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/Co

ntra C

osta C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

San B

ern

ardin

o C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

6 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

9 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

12

mo

nth

cha

ng

e in

tota

l ho

me

lessn

ess b

y site

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

24

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

3 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

Positive p

ercentag

e chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness

Neg

ative percen

tage ch

ang

e into

tal ho

melessn

ess

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

Detro

it Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

6 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

9 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

12

mo

nth

chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness b

y site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

Ap

pen

dix C

: Percen

tage C

han

ge in

the Q

uarterly P

IT Co

un

ts by C

oC

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

3 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

Positive p

ercentag

e chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness

Neg

ative percen

tage ch

ang

e into

tal ho

melessn

ess

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

Detro

it Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

6 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

9 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

12

mo

nth

chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness b

y site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%

50

%6

0%

50

%6

0%

-20

%-3

0%

-40

%

-50

%-6

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Arizo

na B

alance

of State

Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

De

s Mo

ine

s/Po

lk Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance

of State

Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e C

ou

nty C

oC

Marie

tta/Co

bb

Co

un

ty Co

C

Milw

auke

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery C

ou

nty C

oC

Prin

ce G

eo

rge

's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racin

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/Co

ntra C

osta C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

San B

ern

ardin

o C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

3 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

Po

sitive p

erce

ntag

e ch

ang

e in

total h

om

ele

ssne

ss

Ne

gative

pe

rcen

tage

chan

ge

into

tal ho

me

lessn

ess

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%

50

%6

0%

50

%6

0%

-20

%-3

0%

-40

%

-50

%-6

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Arizo

na B

alance

of State

Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

De

s Mo

ine

s/Po

lk Co

un

ty Co

C

De

troit C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance

of State

Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e C

ou

nty C

oC

Marie

tta/Co

bb

Co

un

ty Co

C

Milw

auke

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery C

ou

nty C

oC

Prin

ce G

eo

rge

's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racin

e C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/Co

ntra C

osta C

ou

nty C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

San B

ern

ardin

o C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

6 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

9 m

on

th ch

an

ge

in to

tal h

om

ele

ssne

ss by

site

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

12

mo

nth

cha

ng

e in

tota

l ho

me

lessn

ess b

y site

0%

20

%3

0%

40

%5

0%

60

%-2

0%

-30

%-4

0%

-50

%-6

0%

-10

%1

0%

Cle

velan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ke

ntu

cky Balan

ce o

f State C

oC

Rich

mo

nd

/He

nrico

, Ch

este

rfield

, Han

ove

r Co

un

ties C

oC

All Site

Ave

rage

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

3 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

Positive p

ercentag

e chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness

Neg

ative percen

tage ch

ang

e into

tal ho

melessn

ess

0%20%

30%40%

-20%-30%

-40%-10%

10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%

-50%-60%

-50%-60%

-10%10%

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Arizo

na B

alance o

f State Co

C

Cin

cinn

ati/Ham

ilton

Co

un

ty Co

C

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Des M

oin

es/Polk C

ou

nty C

oC

Detro

it Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ho

lland

/Ottaw

a Co

un

ty Co

C

Idah

o B

alance o

f State Co

C

Iow

a Balan

ce of State C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Lansin

g/East Lan

sing

/Ing

ham

Co

un

ty Co

C

Mad

ison

/Dan

e Co

un

ty Co

C

Marietta/C

ob

b C

ou

nty C

oC

Milw

aukee C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Mo

ntg

om

ery Co

un

ty Co

C

Prince G

eorg

e's Co

un

ty Co

C

Racine C

ity & C

ou

nty C

oC

Richm

on

d/C

on

tra Co

sta Co

un

ty Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

San B

ernard

ino

City &

Co

un

ty Co

C

Wisco

nsin

Balan

ce of State C

oC

All Site A

verage

6 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

9 m

on

th ch

ang

e in to

tal ho

melessn

ess by site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

12

mo

nth

chan

ge in

total h

om

elessness b

y site

0%20%

30%40%

50%60%

-20%-30%

-40%-50%

-60%-10%

10%

Clevelan

d/C

uyah

og

a Co

un

ty Co

C

District o

f Co

lum

bia C

oC

Ken

tucky B

alance o

f State Co

C

Richm

on

d/H

enrico

, Ch

esterfield, H

ano

ver Co

un

ties Co

C

All Site A

verage

25

homelessness pulse report - hud exchange...participation in the pulse project has expanded. section...

Documents