homicide in california, 2009 - department of justice · pdf filehomicide in california 2009....
TRANSCRIPT
Homicide in California
2009
Kamala D. Harris, Attorney GeneralCalifornia Department of Justice
Homicide inside front cover
Homicide inCalifornia2009
Published annually by the California Department of Justice
Division of California Justice Information ServicesBureau of Criminal Information and Analysis
Criminal Justice Statistics Center
This report and other reports are available on the California Attorney General’s website: http://ag.ca.gov
February 2011
The role of the Criminal Justice Statistics Center is to:
Collect,analyze,andreportstatisticaldatathatprovidevalidmeasuresofcrimeandthecriminaljusticeprocess.
Examinethesedataonanongoingbasistobetterdescribecrimeandthecriminaljusticesystem.
Promotetheresponsiblepresentationanduseofcrimestatistics.
California Department of JusticeKamala D. Harris, Attorney General
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. iAt-a-Glance................................................................................................................................................................................................. iv
Homicide Crimes.................................................................................................................................................................................... 1Homicide Arrests.................................................................................................................................................................................25Death Penalty Sentences............................................................................................................................................................33
Peace Officers Killed in the Line of Duty.....................................................................................................................37
Justifiable Homicides......................................................................................................................................................................41
Data Tables.................................................................................................................................................................................................47
AppendicesI Data Characteristics and Known Limitations.................................................................................................................89II Computational Formulas..............................................................................................................................................................91III Glossary.....................................................................................................................................................................................................92
Contents
Homicide in California, 2009
i
E xecutive Summary
Homicide in California, 2009 contains information about the crime of homicide and its victims, as well as demographic data on persons arrested for homicide. Information about the death penalty, the number of peace officers killed in the line of duty, and justifiable homicide is also included. This report provides data for 2009 and prior years.
The California Department of Justice (DOJ) is responsible for reporting annual statistics on homicide as mandated by Penal Code section 13014. Information displayed in this report is extracted from several databases maintained by the DOJ. The primary source of information is the Homicide File, which captures willful and justifiable homicide crime data. Other databases capture information about persons arrested for homicide, death penalty sentences, and peace officers killed in the line of duty.
The type of data collected, and the methods used to collect these data, differ for each data set. Unless otherwise indicated, all calculations are based on the number of known victims.
Homicide Crimes
The Homicide Crimes section (pages 1–22) provides data on homicide crimes reported to law enforcement.
z From 2008 to 2009, the rate of homicide crimes per 100,000 population decreased 8.9 percent (5.6 to 5.1). Comparing 2000 to 2009, the homicide crime rate decreased 15.0 percent (6.0 to 5.1).
z From 2000 to 2009, the homicide rate per 100,000 population ranged from a high of 6.8 in 2002 and 2005 to this year's low of 5.1. The homicide crime rate has not been this low in more than 40 years.
z A greater percentage of white victims were female than were Hispanic or black victims. White victims tended to be older, while Hispanic and black victims tended to be younger.
z Females were more likely to be killed in their residence, while males were more likely to be killed on streets or sidewalks.
z In 2009, where the victim-offender relationship was known, the majority of the victims were killed by friends or acquaintances.
z Firearms were used in 70.5 percent of homicides in 2009.
z Of the 35 counties for which 2009 homicide
rates were calculated, Monterey County experienced the highest homicide rate per 100,000 population (11.8); Napa County experienced the lowest (0.7).
z In 2009, the average daily number of homicides was highest on weekends (6.9 vs. 4.8).
z In 2009, where the contributing circumstance was known, 35.0 percent of homicides were the result of an argument and 39.0 percent were gang-related.
z From 2000 to 2009, the number of gang-related homicides increased 9.5 percent.
ii
Homicide in California, 2009
Homicide Arrests
The Homicide Arrests section (pages 25–29) provides data on arrests made by law enforcement personnel.
z From 2008 to 2009, the rate of homicide arrests per 100,000 population at risk decreased 3.2 percent (6.2 to 6.0). Comparing 2000 to 2009, the homicide arrest rate decreased 3.2 percent (6.2 to 6.0).
z From 2000 to 2009, the overwhelming majority of homicide arrestees and victims were male.
z From 2000 to 2009, the largest percentage of homicide arrestees and victims were Hispanic.
z From 2000 to 2009, the largest percentage of homicide arrestees and victims were aged 18–29.
Death Penalty Sentences
The Death Penalty Sentences section (page 33) provides information about persons sentenced to death in California in 2009. z By the end of 2009, there were 681 persons
under sentence of death in California. Of these, 29 were sentenced in 2009.
Peace Officers Killed in the Line of Duty
Information about peace officers killed in the line of duty (pages 37–38) is obtained from the Homicide File.
z In 2009, four peace officers were feloniously killed in the line of duty.
z Between 2000 and 2009, 43 peace officers were killed in the line of duty.
Justifiable Homicides
Information about justifiable homicides by a private citizen or peace officer (pages 41–44) is obtained from the Homicide File.
z In 2009, justifiable homicides by peace officers were most often the result of a felon attacking a peace officer (50.4 percent).
iii
Executive Summary
iv
HOMICIDE IN CALIFORNIA, 2009
Source: Tables 25 and 34. Notes: Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding. Contributing circumstance percent calculations in this figure are based on the total number of victims, rather than on the number of known circumstances. Therefore, percentages displayed here will not match percentages displayed elsewhere in this report.
HomicideCrimes
1,970100.0%
Gang-Related 531
26.9%
Domestic Violence18
0.9%
All Other Argument316
16.0%
ContributingCircumstance
Known1,14958.3%
Rape0
0.0%
Robbery/Burglary106
5.4%
All Other146
9.2%
Drug-Related 32
1.6%
Gang-Related 23
1.2%
Domestic Violence112
5.7%
All Other Argument51
2.6%
Rape1
0.1%
Robbery/Burglary12
0.6%
All Other68
3.5%
Drug-Related 4
0.2%
ContributingCircumstance
Unknown470
23.9%
ContributingCircumstance
Known271
13.8%
ContributingCircumstance
Unknown80
4.1%
Male1,619
82.2%
Female351
17.8%
At–a–Glance
v
At-a-Glance
Homicide Crimes
The homicide category comprises murder and nonnegligent manslaughter. Attempted murder, justifiable homicide, manslaughter by negli-gence, and suicide are excluded.
Contributing Circumstances
Contributing circumstance, when known, is reported by law enforcement agencies on the supplemental homicide report. In 2009, there were 550 homicides in which the contributing
circumstance was unknown. Of this number, 470 involved male victims and 80 involved female victims.
Homicide Arrests
All California law enforcement agencies report arrest information to the DOJ on the Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR). Data submitted include age, gender, and race/ethnic group, and specify the most serious arrest offense and law enforcement disposition.
Male1,62089.8%
Male1,62089.8%
White283
15.7%
Female184
10.2%
HomicideArrests
1,804100.0%
Hispanic833
46.2%
Black391
21.7%
Other113
6.3%
White60
3.3%
Hispanic74
4.1%
Black39
2.2%
Other11
0.6%
Female184
10.2%
Under 18171
9.5%
18–29944
52.3%
30–39260
14.4%
40 and Over245
13.6%
Under 1811
0.6%
18–2988
4.9%
30–3939
2.2%
40 and Over46
2.5%
Homicide in California, 2009
vi
Homicide in California
Homicide Crimes
1
H omicide Crimes
Homicide is defined by the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program as the “willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another.” The homicide category comprises murder and nonnegligent manslaughter. Attempted murder, justifiable homicide, manslaughter by negligence, and suicide are excluded.
From 2008 to 2009:
z The homicide rate per 100,000 population decreased 8.9 percent (5.6 to 5.1).
z The number of homicides decreased 8.0 percent (from 2,143 to 1,970).
Comparing 2000 to 2009:
z The homicide rate per 100,000 population decreased 15.0 percent (6.0 to 5.1).
z The number of homicides decreased 5.0 percent (from 2,074 to 1,970).
From 2000 to 2009:
z The homicide rate per 100,000 population ranged from a high of 6.8 in 2002 and 2005 to this year's low of 5.1.
Homicide Crimes, 2000–2009Number and Rate per 100,000 Population
Year Number Rate
2009 .................... 1,970 5.1 2008 .................... 2,143 5.6 2007 .................... 2,258 6.0 2006 .................... 2,483 6.6 2005 .................... 2,503 6.8 2004 .................... 2,394 6.5 2003 .................... 2,402 6.7 2002 .................... 2,392 6.8 2001 .................... 2,201 6.3 2000 .................... 2,074 6.0
Source: Table 1.
2
Homicide in California, 2009
Violent Crimes
There are four offenses classified as violent crimes by the FBI: homicide, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. For comparison, changes in the rates of the four offenses follow:
From 2008 to 2009:
z Homicide decreased 8.9 percent (5.6 to 5.1).
z Forcible rape decreased 3.0 percent (23.3 to 22.6).
z Robbery decreased 8.6 percent (181.9 to 166.3).
z Aggravated assault decreased 5.5 percent (274.7 to 259.6).
Comparing 2000 to 2009:
z Homicide decreased 15.0 percent (6.0 to 5.1).
z Forcible rape decreased 20.4 percent (28.4 to 22.6).
z Robbery decreased 4.8 percent (174.7 to 166.3).
z Aggravated assault decreased 35.3 percent (401.4 to 259.6).
Violent Crimes, 2000–2009Rate per 100,000 Population
Source: Table 1.
0.0
20.0
40.0
09080706050403020100
YEAR
RA
TE
250.0
500.0
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
ROBBERY
FORCIBLE RAPE
HOMICIDE
3
Homicide Crimes
Imperial
SanFrancisco
Shasta
SanMateoSantaClara
Sierra
SantaCruz
Siskiyou
SanDiego
ElDoradoSonoma
Modoc
DelNorte
Humboldt
Yolo
Tuolumne
Alpine
Mendocino
Trinity Lassen
Plumas
Nevada
Placer
Amador
Butte
Calaveras
Mariposa
Mono
LosAngeles
Riverside
Madera
Tehama
Sacra-mento
Merced
SanBernardino
SanJoaquin
Stanislaus
Tulare
ContraCosta
Fresno
Kern
Glenn
ColusaLake
Napa
Solano
Alameda
Marin
Yuba
SanBenito
Monterey
Sutter
Inyo
Kings
Orange
Ventura
SanLuisObispo
SantaBarbara
Homicide Rate by CountyHomicide Crimes, 2009
County by Rate per 100,000 Population In 2009, 13 of California’s 35 counties with a population of 100,000 or greater exceeded the statewide homicide rate of 5.1 per 100,000 population. When grouped:
z Two counties had a homicide rate over 10.0 per 100,000 population.
z Eleven counties had homicide rates between 5.0 and 9.9 per 100,000 population.
z Twenty-two counties had homicide rates between 0.0 and 4.9 per 100,000 population.
z Homicide rates were not calculated for the remaining 23 counties with populations of less than 100,000.
10.0 and over
5.0 – 9.9
0.0 – 4.9
Rates not calculated (see Appendix II)
Source: Table 14.
Homicide in California, 2009
4
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
09080706050403020100
YEAR
CLE
AR
AN
CE
RA
TE
Clearance Rates
Homicide Crimes Cleared, 2000–2009Clearance Rate
From 2008 to 2009:
z Homicide clearance rates increased from 57.3 to 63.4.
Comparing 2000 to 2009:
z Homicide clearance rates increased from 52.2 to 63.4.
From 2000 to 2009:
z Clearance rates ranged from this year's high of 63.4 to a low of 49.6 in 2001.
Source: Table 28.Note: A clearance rate is the percentage of crimes (homicides) reported
that have been cleared by law enforcement. See Appendix II – Computational Formulas and Appendix III – Glossary for further information.
Homicide Crimes
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
09080706050403020100
YEAR
RA
TE
BLACK
WHITE
HISPANIC
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
09080706050403020100
YEAR
RA
TE
FEMALE
TOTAL
MALE
5
Homicide Victims Personal Characteristics of the Victim
Homicide Crimes, 2000–2009By Gender of Victim
Rate per 100,000 Population
In 2009:
z The total homicide rate was 5.1 per 100,000 population.
z The male homicide rate was more than four times that of the female homicide rate (8.4 vs. 1.8).
Comparing 2000 to 2009:
z The male homicide rate decreased 12.5 percent.
z The female homicide rate decreased 25.0 percent.
Source: Table 2.
Homicide Crimes, 2000–2009By Race/Ethnic Group of Victim
Rate per 100,000 Population
In 2009:
z The black homicide rate was more than nine times that of whites and more than three times that of Hispanics (23.4 vs. 2.4 and 6.4, respectively).
Comparing 2000 to 2009:
z The white homicide rate showed no change.
z The Hispanic homicide rate decreased 26.4 percent.
z The black homicide rate decreased 7.1 percent.
Source: Table 3.
Homicide in California, 2009
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
09080706050403020100
YEAR
RA
TE
40 AND OVER
UNDER 18
18-29
30-39
6
Personal Characteristics of the Victim (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2000–2009By Age of Victim
Rate per 100,000 Population
In 2009:
z Persons aged 18–29 had the highest homicide victimization rate (12.5 per 100,000 population).
Comparing 2000 to 2009, the homicide rate:
z Decreased 4.0 percent for victims under age 18.
z Decreased 22.4 percent for victims aged 18–29.
z Increased 1.5 percent for victims aged 30–39.
z Decreased 20.5 percent for victims aged 40 and over.
Source: Table 4.
Homicide Crimes
7
Personal Characteristics of the Victim (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009By Gender of Victim
In 2009, there were 1,970 victims of homicide. Of these:
z Males represented 82.2 percent (1,619) of total homicide victims; they comprised 49.9 percent of the population.
z Females represented 17.8 percent (351) of total homicide victims; they comprised 50.1 percent of the population.
Source: Table 5.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Gender of Victim by Percent of Total Victims
and Percent of Population
49.9%
82.2%
Victims Population
50.1%
17.8%
FEMALEMALE
MALE82.2%
FEMALE17.8%
Source: Tables 2 and 5.
Homicide in California, 2009
8
Personal Characteristics of the Victim (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009By Race/Ethnic Group of Victim
WHITE20.0%
BLACK27.3%
OTHER6.1%
HISPANIC46.6%
In 2009, the race/ethnicity of the homicide victim was reported in 1,959 cases. Of these:
z Whites represented 20.0 percent (392) of the homicide victims; they comprised 42.5 percent of the population.
z Hispanics represented 46.6 percent (913) of the homicide victims; they comprised 36.7 percent of the population.
z Blacks represented 27.3 percent (534) of the homicide victims; they comprised 5.9 percent of the population.
z The “other” race/ethnic group category represented 6.1 percent (120) of the homicide victims; they comprised 15.0 percent of the population.
Source: Table 6.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Victim by Percent of
Total Victims and Percent of Population
Source: Tables 3 and 6.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
42.5%
20.0%
Victims Population
36.7%
46.6%
BLACKWHITE OTHERHISPANIC
5.9%
27.3%
15.0%
6.1%
Homicide Crimes
9
Personal Characteristics of the Victim (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009By Age of Victim
In 2009, the age of the homicide victim was reported in 1,961 cases. Of these:
z 12.3 percent (242) of the homicide victims were under age 18; this age group comprised 25.8 percent of the population.
z 42.7 percent (838) of the homicide victims were aged 18–29; this age group comprised 17.3 percent of the population.
z 18.0 percent (353) of the homicide victims were aged 30–39; this age group comprised 13.5 percent of the population.
z 26.9 percent (528) of the homicide victims were aged 40 and over; this age group comprised 43.4 percent of the population.
Source: Table 7.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Age of Victim by Percent of Total Victims
and Percent of Population
25.8%
12.3%
Victims Population
17.3%
42.5%
30-39UNDER 18 40 AND OVER18-29
13.5%17.9%
43.4%
26.9%
UNDER18
12.3%
30-3918.0%
40 AND OVER
26.9%
18-2942.7%
Source: Tables 4 and 7.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide in California, 2009
10
Personal Characteristics of the Victim (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Victim
By Gender of Victim
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of white victims were female than were either Hispanic or black victims (31.9 vs. 13.6 and 12.9 percent, respectively).
BLACK
HISPANIC
WHITE
Male Female
68.1%
86.4%
87.1%
31.9%
13.6%
12.9%
Source: Table 8.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Victim
By Age of Victim
BLACK
HISPANIC
WHITE
< 18 18-29 30-39 40+
8.4%
14.3%
53.8%25.0%
48.7%
20.3%
12.8%
20.1%
18.9%
47.1%12.6%
18.1%
Source: Table 9.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of Hispanic and black victims were aged 18–29 than were white victims (48.7 and 47.1 vs. 25.0 percent, respectively).
z A greater percentage of white victims were aged 40 and over than were either Hispanic or black victims (53.8 vs. 18.1 and 20.3 percent, respectively).
Homicide Crimes
0
25
50
75
100
09080706050403020100YEAR
PE
RC
EN
T
STRANGER
FRIEND/ACQUAINTANCE
11
Relationship of the Victim to the Offender
Homicide Crimes, 2009By Relationship of Victim to Offender
In 2009, the relationship of the homicide victim to the offender was reported in 1,092 cases. Of these:
z 52.4 percent (572) of victims were friends or acquaintances of offenders.
z 5.9 percent (64) of victims were spouses of offenders.
z 8.8 percent (96) of victims were parents or children of offenders.
z 3.1 percent (34) of victims were classified as "other relative" of the offender.
z 29.9 percent (326) of victims were strangers to offenders.
FRIEND,ACQUAINTANCE
52.4%
PARENT, CHILD
STRANGER29.9%
SPOUSE
OTHERRELATIVE
3.1%
8.8%
5.9%
Source: Table 11.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide Crimes, 2000–2009By Selected Relationships of
Victims to Offenders
Comparing 2008 to 2009:
z The proportion of homicides in which victims were friends or acquaintances of offenders increased from 48.5 percent to 52.4 percent.
Comparing 2000 to 2009:
z The proportion of homicides in which victims were friends or acquaintances of offenders increased from 47.0 percent to 52.4 percent.
z The proportion of homicides in which victims were strangers to the offenders decreased from 33.6 percent to 29.9 percent.
Source: Table 11.
Homicide in California, 2009
12
Relationship of the Victim to the Offender (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009Gender of Victim
By Relationship of Victim to Offender
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of female victims were spouses of offenders (22.1 percent) than were male victims (0.5 percent).
0 20 40 60 80 100
FEMALE
MALE
Friend,acquaintance
Spouse Parent,child
Otherrelative
Stranger
55.4%
18.8%
5.5%
0.5%
4.1%11.8%
35.8%
22.1%43.2%
2.8%
Source: Table 12.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Victim
By Relationship of Victim to Offender
BLACK
HISPANIC
WHITE
Friend,acquaintance
Spouse Parent,child
Otherrelative
Stranger
53.4%4.3%10.1%
19.5%12.6%
56.5%2.0%
4.4%31.7%
5.4%
44.6% 11.6%3.4%
38.2%2.1%
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of Hispanic and black victims were strangers to offenders than were white victims (31.7 and 38.2 vs. 19.5 percent, respectively).
Source: Table 12.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide Crimes
13
Relationship of the Victim to the Offender (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009Age of Victim by Relationship of
Victim to Offender
40 ANDOVER
30-39
18-29
UNDER 18
Friend,acquaintance
Spouse Parent,child
Otherrelative
Stranger
37.3%2.4%
24.9%35.5%
59.5%1.7%2.7%
34.6%
1.5%
56.2%3.4%8.4%
30.3%
1.7%
49.5%5.1%
11.4% 25.8%
8.1%
In 2009: z Over half of the victims aged 18–29 and
aged 30–39 were friends or acquaintances of the offenders (59.5 and 56.2 percent, respectively).
z A greater percentage of victims aged 40 and over were spouses of the offenders (11.4 percent) than were victims in any other age group shown.
Source: Table 13.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide in California, 2009
14
Elements of the HomicideDay of Incident
Homicide Crimes, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Victim by
Average Daily Number of Incidents on Weekdays and Weekends
OTHERBLACKHISPANICWHITETOTAL
4.8
6.9
AVE
RA
GE
DA
ILY
NU
MB
ER
1.0 1.2
2.1
3.4
1.30.3
Weekday Weekend
1.8
0.5
In 2009, when homicides were examined by day of incident, it was found that:
z An average of 4.8 homicide victims were killed each weekday and 6.9 homicide victims were killed each weekend day.
z Hispanic victims had the highest average daily number of incidents on both weekdays and weekends (2.1 and 3.4, respectively) of any race/ethnic group shown.
z Victims aged 18–29 had the highest average daily number of incidents on both weekdays and weekends (1.9 and 3.2, respectively) of any age group shown.
Source: Table 16.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Age of Victim by Average Daily Numberof Incidents on Weekdays and Weekends
40 AND OVER30-3918-29UNDER 18
0.6 0.8
AVE
RA
GE
DA
ILY
NU
MB
ER
1.91.4
0.8
3.2
1.4 1.5
Weekday Weekend
Source: Table 17.
Homicide Crimes
15
Location
Homicide Crimes, 2009By Location of Homicide
STREET,SIDEWALK
35.4%
ALL OTHER39.3%
VICTIM'S,SHARED
RESIDENCE25.3%
In 2009, the location of the homicide was reported in 1,879 cases. Of these:
z 25.3 percent (475) of victims were killed at their places of residence.
z 35.4 percent (665) of homicides occurred on streets or sidewalks.
z 39.3 percent (739) of homicides occurred in locations grouped in the "all other" category.
Source: Table 19.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Gender of Victim
by Location of Homicide
FEMALE
MALE
Victim's,shared residence
Street,sidewalk
Allother
19.0% 41.6%39.5%
54.7% 28.8%16.5%
Source: Table 19.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
In 2009:
z The greatest percentage of males (39.5 percent) were killed on streets or sidewalks.
z The majority of females (54.7 percent) were killed at their places of residence.
Homicide in California, 2009
16
Location (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Victim
By Location of Homicide
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of whites than Hispanics or blacks were killed at their places of residence (45.9 vs. 21.6 and 15.2 percent, respectively).
z A greater percentage of Hispanics and blacks were killed on streets or sidewalks than were whites (37.6 and 46.7 vs. 20.3 percent, respectively).BLACK
HISPANIC
WHITE
Victim's,shared residence
Street,sidewalk
Allother
45.9% 33.9%20.3%
21.6% 40.8%37.6%
15.2% 38.1%46.7%
Source: Table 19.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Age of Victim by Location of Homicide
40 ANDOVER
30-39
18-29
UNDER 18
Victim's,shared residence
Street,sidewalk
Allother
37.3% 27.9%34.8%
12.4% 42.6%45.0%
23.1% 45.0%31.8%
41.7% 35.0%23.2%
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of victims aged 18–29 were killed on streets or sidewalks (45.0 percent) than were victims in any other age group shown.
z A greater percentage of victims aged 40 and over were killed at their places of residence (41.7 percent) than were victims in any other age group shown.
Source: Table 20.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide Crimes
17
Weapon
Homicide Crimes, 2009By Type of Weapon Used
FIREARM70.5%
PERSONALWEAPON
5.5%
ALL OTHER3.6%
KNIFE15.1%
BLUNTOBJECT5.3%
Source: Table 21.
In 2009, the type of weapon used in the homicide was reported in 1,928 cases. Of these:
z 70.5 percent (1,359) involved firearms.
z 15.1 percent (291) involved knives.
z 5.5 percent (107) involved the use of personal weapons (hands, feet, etc.).
z 5.3 percent (102) involved blunt objects (clubs, etc.).
z 3.6 percent (69) involved weapons grouped in the “all other” category (rope, drugs, etc.).
Homicide Crimes, 2000–2009By Selected Types of Weapons Used
0
20
40
60
80
100
09080706050403020100
YEAR
PE
RC
EN
T
FIREARM
NON-FIREARM
From 2000 to 2009:
z Firearms were consistently used in over 70 percent of homicides.
Source: Table 21.
Homicide in California, 2009
18
Weapon (continued)
0 20 40 60 80 100
FEMALE
MALE
Firearm Knife Bluntobject
Personalweapon
Allother
75.5%
4.5%4.7%
1.6%
13.7%
47.1%
10.3%
21.8% 12.6%
8.2%
Homicide Crimes, 2009Gender of Victim by Type of Weapon Used
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of males (75.5 percent) were killed with firearms than were females (47.1 percent).
Source: Table 22.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Victim
By Type of Weapon Used
BLACK
HISPANIC
WHITE
Firearm Knife Bluntobject
Personalweapon
Allother
48.8% 10.3%24.9% 10.1%
72.6%
4.4%
15.2%
3.1%
4.7%
83.2%
4.0%
7.7%2.1%
3.0%
5.8%
Source: Table 22.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of Hispanics and blacks were killed with firearms than were whites (72.6 and 83.2 vs. 48.8 percent, respectively).
Homicide Crimes
19
Weapon (continued)
40 ANDOVER
30-39
18-29
UNDER 18
Firearm Knife Bluntobject
Personalweapon
Allother
58.9%
6.2%
10.8%
6.2%
17.8%
84.1%
2.2%
10.3%1.1%
2.3%
74.6%
1.7%
2.3%
4.0%17.3%
51.4% 11.8%
3.7%
23.5% 9.6%
Homicide Crimes, 2009Age of Victim by Type of Weapon Used
Source: Table 23.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
In 2009:
z The majority of victims, regardless of age group, were killed with firearms.
z A greater percentage of victims aged 40 and over were killed with non-firearms (48.6 percent) than were victims in any other age group shown.
Homicide in California, 2009
20
Contributing Circumstance
Homicide Crimes, 2009By Contributing Circumstance
ARGUMENT35.0%
DRUG-RELATED
RAPE,ROBBERY,BURGLARY
GANG-RELATED39.0%
ALLOTHER15.1%
8.4%
2.5%
Domesticviolence-related
argument
Allother
arguments
9.2% 25.8%
In 2009, the contributing circumstance was reported in 1,420 homicide cases. Of these:
z 8.4 percent (119) occurred as a result of a rape, robbery, or burglary.
z 35.0 percent (497) occurred as a result of an argument.
z z9.2 percent (130) occurred as a result of a domestic violence-related argument.
z z25.8 percent (367) occurred as a result of all other types of arguments.
z 39.0 percent (554) were gang-related.
z 2.5 percent (36) were drug-related.
z 15.1 percent (214) occurred as a result of “all other” contributing circumstances.
Source: Table 24.
Homicide Crimes, 2000–2009By Selected Contributing Circumstance
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
09080706050403020100YEAR
PE
RC
EN
T
GANG-RELATED
DRUG-RELATED
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE-RELATED ARGUMENT
From 2008 to 2009:
z The number of gang-related homicides increased 18.1 percent.
Comparing 2000 to 2009:
z The percentage of gang-related homicides increased from 28.8 percent to 39.0 percent.
z The percentage of domestic violence-related homicides increased from 8.4 percent to 9.2 percent.
z The percentage of drug-related homicides decreased from 4.3 percent to 2.5 percent.
Source: Table 24.
Homicide Crimes
21
Contributing Circumstance (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009Gender of Victim
by Contributing Circumstance
In 2009:
z Males were victims of gang-related homicides more than any other contributing circumstance (46.2 percent).
z Females were victims of domestic violence-related homicides more than any other contributing circumstance (41.3 percent).
0 20 40 60 80 100
FEMALE
MALE
Robbery,burglary
Domesticviolence
Allother
arguments
Gang-related
Drug-related
9.2%
27.5%2.8%
12.7%46.2%
4.4%41.3%
1.5%25.1%18.8%
Allother
1.6%
8.5%
Source: Table 25.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide Crimes, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Victim
by Contributing Circumstance
BLACK
HISPANIC
WHITE 13.6% 38.8%2.2%16.8%
8.8%
5.9%
21.8%2.5%
14.0%49.1%
21.4%2.4%
15.3%49.1%
Rape,robbery,burglary
Domesticviolence
Allother
arguments
Gang-related
Drug-related
Allother
19.8%
6.6%
5.1%6.7%
In 2009:
z The proportion of gang-related homicides was much greater for Hispanics and blacks than for whites (49.1 and 49.1 vs. 8.8 percent, respectively).
Source: Table 25.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide in California, 2009
22
Contributing Circumstance (continued)
Homicide Crimes, 2009Age of Victim by Contributing Circumstance
40 ANDOVER
30-39
18-29
5-17
UNDER 5
16.3%
9.0%89.6%
2.2%
9.4% 11.6%64.5%
24.0% 55.2%8.5%
5.5%
26.6% 45.1%
18.1% 40.1% 12.0%13.5%
Rape,robbery,burglary
Domesticviolence
Allother
arguments
Gang-,drug-
related
Childabuse
Allother
6.8%
12.3%
11.6%
0.7%
1.5%
8.2%
7.8%
In 2009, where the contributing circumstance was known:
z The majority of homicide victims under age 5 were killed as a result of child abuse (89.6 percent).
z The greatest percentage of homicide victims aged 5–17 (64.5 percent), aged 18–29 (55.2 percent), and aged 30–39 (45.1 percent) were killed as a result of gang- or drug-related activities.
z The greatest percentage of homicide victims aged 40 and over (40.1 percent) were killed as a result of an argument.
Source: Table 26.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Homicide in California
Homicide Arrests
25
H omicide Arrests
Unlike crimes, which are classified by nationwide Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) standards, arrests are reported by the statutory definition of the offense. This may cause some differences in the definitions of certain crimes and the reporting of the arrests for those crimes. For instance, the California definition of a homicide arrest includes murder and nonvehicular manslaughter. The federal definition of a homicide crime includes murder and nonnegligent (nonaccidental) manslaughter.
California law enforcement agencies report arrest and citation information to the DOJ on the Monthly Arrest and Citation Register. This file contains information about the age, gender, and race/ethnic group of the arrestee, and specifies the “most serious” arrest offense and law enforcement disposition.
From 2008 to 2009:
z The homicide arrest rate per 100,000 population at risk decreased 3.2 percent (6.2 to 6.0).
Comparing 2000 to 2009:
z The homicide arrest rate per 100,000 population at risk decreased 3.2 percent (6.2 to 6.0).
From 2000 to 2009:
z The homicide arrest rate ranged from a high of 7.0 in 2004 to this year's low of 6.0.
Homicide Arrests, 2000–2009Number and Rate per 100,000 Population at Risk
Year Number Rate
2009 .................... 1,804 6.0 2008 .................... 1,850 6.2 2007 .................... 2,017 6.8 2006 .................... 1,967 6.7 2005 .................... 1,956 6.8 2004 .................... 1,978 7.0 2003 .................... 1,839 6.6 2002 .................... 1,864 6.8 2001 .................... 1,754 6.6 2000 .................... 1,627 6.2
Source: Table 29.
Note: The following penal codes for homicide arrest offenses were valid at the time of the closeout of the 2009 arrest offense code file: 128, 187(a), 189, 192(a), 192(b), 193(a), 193(b), 273ab, 399, and 12310(a).
26
Homicide in California, 2009
Personal Characteristics of the Arrestee
Homicide Arrests, 2009By Gender of Arrestee
MALE89.8%
FEMALE10.2%
In 2009, there were 1,804 individuals arrested for homicide. Of these:
z 89.8 percent (1,620) of arrestees were male.
z 10.2 percent (184) of arrestees were female.
Source: Table 30.
Population in California, 2009By Gender
MALE49.9%
FEMALE50.1%
Source: Table 2.
27
Homicide Arrests
Personal Characteristics of the Arrestee (continued)
Homicide Arrests, 2009By Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee
WHITE19.0%
BLACK23.8%
OTHER6.9%
HISPANIC50.3%
In 2009, there were 1,804 individuals arrested for homicide. Of these:
z 19.0 percent (343) of arrestees were white.
z 50.3 percent (907) of arrestees were Hispanic.
z 23.8 percent (430) of arrestees were black.
z 6.9 percent (124) of arrestees fell into the “other” race/ethnic group category.
Source: Table 31.
Population in California, 2009By Race/Ethnic Group
WHITE42.5%
BLACK5.9%
OTHER15.0%
HISPANIC36.7%
Source: Table 3.Notes: Beginning in 2004, the "other" category includes the race/ethnic group of "multi-racial." Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Note: The subjectivity of the classification and labeling process must be considered in the analysis of race/ethnic group data. As commonly used, race refers to large populations that share certain similar physical characteristics such as skin color. Because these physical characteristics can vary greatly within groups as well as between groups, determination of race is frequently, by necessity, subjective. Ethnicity refers to cultural heritage and can cross racial lines. For example, the ethnic designation "Hispanic" can include persons of any race. Most commonly, self-identification of race/ethnicity is used in the classification and labeling process.
Homicide in California, 2009
28
Personal Characteristics of the Arrestee(continued)
Homicide Arrests, 2009By Age of Arrestee
In 2009, there were 1,804 individuals arrested for homicide. Of these:
z 10.1 percent (182) of arrestees were under age 18.
z 57.2 percent (1,032) of arrestees were aged 18–29.
z 16.6 percent (299) of arrestees were aged 30–39.
z 16.1 percent (291) of arrestees were aged 40 and over.
UNDER18
10.1%
30-3916.6%
40 ANDOVER
16.1%
18-2957.2%
Source: Table 32.
Population in California, 2009By Age
UNDER 1825.8%
30-3913.5%
40 AND OVER43.4%
18-2917.3%
Source: Table 4.
Homicide Arrests
29
Personal Characteristics of the Arrestee(continued)
Homicide Arrests, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee by
Gender of Arrestee
BLACK
HISPANIC
WHITE
Male Female
82.5% 17.5%
8.2%91.8%
9.1%90.9%
In 2009:
z Homicide arrestees for all three race/ethnic groups shown were predominately male.
z A greater percentage of white arrestees were female than were Hispanic or black arrestees (17.5 vs. 8.2 and 9.1 percent, respectively).
Source: Table 33.
Homicide Arrests, 2009Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee by
Age of Arrestee
BLACK
HISPANIC
WHITE
< 18 18-29 30-39 40+
4.4%
12.1%
39.4%36.2%
64.6%
13.0%
20.1%
15.3%
15.4%
60.7%10.9%
7.8%
In 2009:
z A greater percentage of white arrestees were aged 40 and over than were Hispanic or black arrestees (39.4 vs. 7.8 and 13.0 percent, respectively).
z The majority of Hispanic and black arrestees were aged 18–29 (64.6 and 60.7 percent, respectively).
Source: Table 33.
Homicide in California
Death Penalty Sentences
0
250
500
750
0908060402009896949290888684828078
YEAR
NU
MB
ER
33
D eath Penalty Sentences
Persons Under California Sentence of Death, 1978–2009
This section contains information about persons sentenced to death in California in 2009. Death penalty data were extracted from the 2009 Offender-Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) system. For detailed information regarding the death penalty and the criteria by which a person can be sentenced to death, refer to California Penal Code sections 190 through 190.9.
During 2009, there were 29 persons convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. These were initial death sentences only and do not include persons who were resentenced to death after their death sentences were reversed on appeal. By the end of 2009, there were 681 persons under sentence of death in California.
In 2009, of the 29 persons newly sentenced to death:
z All but one were male.
z Nine were white, nine were Hispanic, and eleven were black.
z The average age at arrest was 33.
z Los Angeles County sentenced the largest number with 13.
Note: Additional information can be found in Tables 35 and 36.
Source: Table 35.
Homicide in California
Peace Officers Killed in the Line of Duty
37
P eace Officers Killed in the Line of Duty
Information about peace officers killed in the line of duty was obtained from the Homicide File. Only sworn officers feloniously killed in the line of duty are included. (Sworn officers accidentally killed in the line of duty and non-sworn officers, such as security guards, are excluded.)
In 2009, four peace officers were killed in the line of duty.
z Two peace officers were killed by the offenders' rifle.
z Two peace officers were killed by the offenders' unspecified firearm.
Peace Officers Killed in the Line of Duty, 2009By Type of Weapon Used
Type of weapon used Total Offender’s Officer’s
Total ........................... 4 4 0
Rifle ......................... 2 2 0 Firearm (not specified) .... 2 2 0
In 2009:
z All four peace officers killed in the line of duty were male; one was white, one was black, and two were of race/ethnicities categorized as "other."
Peace Officers Killed in the Line of Duty, 2009
Race/Ethnic Group of Officer By Gender of Officer
Gender Race/ethnic group Total Male Female
Total ........................... 4 4 0
White ...................... 1 1 0 Black ....................... 1 1 0 Other ...................... 2 2 0
38
Homicide in California, 2009
Peace Officers Killed in the Line of Duty, 2000–2009
From 2000 to 2009:
z 43 peace officers were killed in the line of duty. During this time period, the largest number of deaths occurred in 2001 and 2003 (6 each), and the fewest number of deaths occurred in 2000 (2).
Year
Total ...................................
Number ofofficers killed
43
2009 .............................. 4 2008 .............................. 3 2007 .............................. 4 2006 .............................. 5 2005 .............................. 5 2004 .............................. 4 2003 .............................. 6 2002 .............................. 4 2001 .............................. 6 2000 .............................. 2
Note: Additional information can be found in Tables 37 and 38.
Homicide in California
Justifiable Homicides
41
J ustifiable Homicides
A justifiable homicide is defined by the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program as the killing of a felon by a private citizen or peace officer during the commission of a felony. Justifiable homicides are sometimes referred to as excusable or noncriminal homicides.
In 2009, when justifiable homicides were examined by gender, it was found that:
z 93.8 percent (106) of felons killed by peace officers were male, and 6.2 percent (7) were female.
z All felons killed by private citizens (133) were male.
Justifiable Homicides by Peace Officersor Private Citizens, 2009
By Gender of Deceased
BY PRIVATE CITIZEN
BY PEACE
OFFICER
Male Female
93.8% 6.2%
100.0%
Source: Table 39.
42
Homicide in California, 2009
Personal Characteristics of the Deceased
In 2009:
z A greater proportion of felons killed by peace officers were Hispanic than were white or black (43.4 vs. 25.7 and 22.1 percent, respectively).
z The felons killed by private citizens were less likely to be white than Hispanic or black (12.1 vs. 45.5 and 42.4 percent, respectively).
Justifiable Homicides by Peace Officersor Private Citizens, 2009
By Race/Ethnic Group of Deceased
BY PRIVATE CITIZEN
BY PEACE
OFFICER
Black OtherWhite Hispanic
25.7% 43.4%8.9%
22.1%
12.1% 45.5% 42.4%
Source: Table 39.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
In 2009:
z A greater proportion of felons killed by peace officers were aged 18–29 (46.0 percent) than were any other age group.
z The largest proportion of felons killed by private citizens were aged 18–29 (60.6 percent).
Justifiable Homicides by Peace Officersor Private Citizens, 2009
By Age of Deceased
BY PRIVATE CITIZEN
BY PEACE
OFFICER
< 18 18-29 30-39 40+
46.0% 26.5%23.0%
60.6% 15.2%18.2%
4.4%
6.1%
Source: Table 39.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
43
Justifiable Homicides
Elements of the Justifiable HomicideLocation
Justifiable Homicides by Peace Officers, 2009
By Location of Justifiable Homicide
In 2009, when justifiable homicides were examined by location, it was found that:
z The largest proportion of felons killed by peace officers were killed on a street or sidewalk (43.4 percent).
z The largest proportion of felons killed by private citizens were killed in a residence other than their own (30.3 percent).
FELON’SRESIDENCE
15.9%
STREET, SIDEWALK
ALLOTHER24.8% OTHER
RESIDENCE
COMMERCIALESTABLISHMENT
7.1%43.4%
8.8%
Source: Table 40.
Justifiable Homicides by Private Citizens, 2009
By Location of Justifiable Homicide
Source: Table 40.
OTHERRESIDENCE
30.3%
COMMERCIALESTABLISHMENT
15.2%
ALLOTHER21.2%
STREET,SIDEWALK
9.1%
CITIZENS,SHARED
RESIDENCE24.2%
Homicide in California, 2009
44
Contributing Circumstance
Justifiable Homicides by Peace Officers, 2009
By Contributing Circumstance
FELON KILLED DURING
COMMISSION OF CRIME
34.5%
ALLOTHER11.5%
FELON ATTACKEDPEACE OFFICER
50.4%
FELONRESISTED ARREST
3.5%
Source: Table 41.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
In 2009, when justifiable homicides were examined by known contributing circumstance, it was found that:
z Most felons killed by peace officers were killed while attacking a peace officer (50.4 percent).
z Most felons killed by private citizens were killed while attacking a citizen (54.5 percent).
Justifiable Homicides by Private Citizens, 2009
By Contributing Circumstance
Source: Table 41.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
FELON KILLEDDURING
COMMISSIONOF CRIME42.4%
FELON ATTACKED
CITIZEN54.5%
OTHER3.0%
Homicide in California
Data Tables
Number, Rate
Table 1VIOLENT CRIMES, 2000-2009per 100,000 Population, and Percent Change
Year(s) Total HomicideForcible
rapeRobbery
Aggravatedassault
Number2009................. 174,579 1,970 8,698 64,006 99,9052008................. 185,233 2,143 8,906 69,391 104,7932007................... 191,493 2,258 9,047 70,702 109,4862006................... 194,128 2,483 9,213 70,961 111,4712005................... 189,593 2,503 9,345 63,424 114,321
2004................... 197,432 2,394 9,598 61,573 123,8672003................... 204,591 2,402 9,918 63,597 128,6742002................... 207,988 2,392 10,176 64,805 130,6152001................... 210,510 2,201 9,882 63,299 135,1282000................... 210,492 2,074 9,785 60,243 138,390
Percent change in number2008-2009......... -5.8 -8.1 -2.3 -7.8 -4.72007-2008......... -3.3 -5.1 -1.6 -1.9 -4.32006-2007......... -1.4 -9.1 -1.8 -0.4 -1.82005-2006......... 2.4 -0.8 -1.4 11.9 -2.52004-2005......... -4.0 4.6 -2.6 3.0 -7.7
2003-2004......... -3.5 -0.3 -3.2 -3.2 -3.72002-2003......... -1.6 0.4 -2.5 -1.9 -1.52001-2002......... -1.2 8.7 3.0 2.4 -3.32000-2001......... 0.0 6.1 1.0 5.1 -2.4
2000-2009......... -17.1 -5.0 -11.1 6.2 -27.8
Rate per 100,000 1population2009................... 453.6 5.1 22.6 166.3 259.62008................... 485.6 5.6 23.3 181.9 274.72007................... 507.0 6.0 24.0 187.2 289.92006................... 518.4 6.6 24.6 189.5 297.72005................... 512.3 6.8 25.3 171.4 308.9
2004................... 539.6 6.5 26.2 168.3 338.52003................... 569.4 6.7 27.6 177.0 358.12002................... 589.2 6.8 28.8 183.6 370.02001................... 605.6 6.3 28.4 182.1 388.82000................... 610.5 6.0 28.4 174.7 401.4
Percent change in rate2008-2009......... -6.6 -8.9 -3.0 -8.6 -5.52007-2008......... -4.2 -6.7 -2.9 -2.8 -5.22006-2007......... -2.2 -9.1 -2.4 -1.2 -2.62005-2006......... 1.2 -2.9 -2.8 10.6 -3.62004-2005......... -5.1 4.6 -3.4 1.8 -8.7
2003-2004......... -5.2 -3.0 -5.1 -4.9 -5.52002-2003......... -3.4 -1.5 -4.2 -3.6 -3.22001-2002......... -2.7 7.9 1.4 0.8 -4.82000-2001......... -0.8 5.0 0.0 4.2 -3.1
2000-2009......... -25.7 -15.0 -20.4 -4.8 -35.3Note: Rates may not add to total because of rounding.1 Rates are based on annual population estimates provided Unit, California Department of Finance.
by the Demographic Research
47
Tab
le 2
HO
MIC
IDE
CR
IME
S, 2
000-
2009
By
Gen
der
of V
ictim
Num
ber,
Per
cent
, and
Rat
e pe
r 10
0,00
0 P
opul
atio
n
Gen
der
of v
ictim
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Per
cent
cha
nge
2000
-20
08-
2009
2009
Tot
al
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s....
......
..
Per
cent
of v
ictim
s....
......
...1
P
opul
atio
n...
......
…...
......
.
Per
cent
of p
opul
atio
n....
...
Rat
e....
......
.….…
......
......
..2
M
ale
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s....
.....
Per
cent
of t
otal
vic
tims.
.1
P
opul
atio
n...
......
…...
......
.
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion…
Rat
e....
.....…
.…...
......
....
F
emal
e
N
umbe
r of
vic
tims.
......
..
P
erce
nt o
f tot
al v
ictim
s..
1
Pop
ulat
ion
......
...…
......
....
Per
cent
of p
opul
atio
n…
R
ate.
.…...
.…...
…...
......
..
2,07
410
0.0%
34,4
80,0
0010
0.0% 6.
0
1,66
680
.3%
17,3
98,9
9550
.2% 9.6
408
19.7
%17
,254
,400
49.8
% 2.4
2,20
110
0.0%
34,7
58,0
0010
0.0% 6.
3
1,75
679
.8%
17,6
94,4
1150
.2% 9.9
445
20.2
%17
,538
,924
49.8
% 2.5
2,39
210
0.0%
35,3
01,0
0010
0.0% 6.
8
1,93
881
.0%
17,9
84,1
9550
.2%
10.8
454
19.0
%17
,818
,043
49.8
% 2.5
2,40
210
0.0%
35,9
34,0
0010
0.0% 6.
7
1,97
282
.1%
18,2
70,1
2750
.2%
10.8
430
17.9
%18
,093
,375
49.8
% 2.4
2,39
410
0.0%
36,5
90,8
1410
0.0% 6.
5
1,99
283
.2%
18,1
61,6
5449
.9%
11.0
402
16.8
%18
,214
,757
50.1
% 2.2
2,50
310
0.0%
37,0
04,6
6110
0.0% 6.
8
2,10
183
.9%
18,4
03,8
0649
.9%
11.4
402
16.1
%18
,450
,418
50.1
% 2.2
2,48
310
0.0%
37,4
44,3
8510
0.0% 6.
6
2,07
083
.4%
18,6
45,3
0449
.9%
11.1
413
16.6
%18
,689
,664
50.1
% 2.2
2,25
810
0.0%
37,7
71,4
3110
0.0% 6.
0
1,86
582
.6%
18,8
70,9
8649
.9% 9.9
393
17.4
%18
,939
,596
50.1
% 2.1
2,14
310
0.0%
38,1
48,4
9310
0.0% 5.
6
1,76
682
.4%
19,0
87,0
5849
.9% 9.3
377
17.6
%19
,159
,540
50.1
% 2.0
1,97
010
0.0%
38,4
87,8
8910
0.0% 5.
1
1,61
982
.2%
19,3
05,7
0949
.9% 8.4
351
17.8
%19
,382
,584
50.1
% 1.8
-5.0
-8.1
11.6
0.9
-15.
0-8
.9
-2.8
-8.3
11.0
1.1
-12.
5-9
.7
-14.
0-6
.9
12.3
1.2
-25.
0-1
0.0
Not
es:
Rat
es a
re b
ased
on
annu
al p
opul
atio
n es
timat
es p
rovi
ded
by th
e D
emog
raph
ic R
esea
rch
Uni
t, C
alifo
rnia
Dep
artm
ent o
f Fin
ance
.
Rat
es a
re c
alcu
late
d us
ing
the
popu
latio
n fo
r ea
ch s
ubgr
oup
show
n; th
eref
ore,
they
will
not
add
to th
e ra
te c
alcu
late
d fo
r th
e to
tal p
opul
atio
n.
Pop
ulat
ion
brea
kdow
ns b
y ge
nder
will
not
add
to to
tal b
ecau
se o
f var
iatio
ns in
pop
ulat
ion
sour
ce d
ata.
The
"pe
rcen
t of p
opul
atio
n" c
ateg
ory
for
mal
e an
d fe
mal
e w
as c
alcu
late
d us
ing
the
sum
of t
he m
ale
and
fem
ale
popu
latio
ns.
1
Beg
inni
ng in
200
4, p
opul
atio
n es
timat
es a
re b
ased
on
the
2000
Cen
sus.
Pre
viou
s po
pula
tion
estim
ates
are
bas
ed o
n re
visi
ons
of th
e 19
90 C
ensu
s. R
eade
rs a
re a
dvis
ed to
exe
rcis
e ca
re
i
n in
terp
retin
g ch
ange
s in
per
cent
and
rat
e be
twee
n de
cenn
ial c
ensu
s sa
mpl
es.
2 T
he "
mal
e" c
ateg
ory
incl
udes
hom
icid
e vi
ctim
s w
hose
gen
der
coul
d no
t be
dete
rmin
ed: 2
000
incl
udes
two,
200
1 in
clud
es o
ne, a
nd 2
002
incl
udes
one
.
48
Tab
le 3
H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y R
ace/
Eth
nic
Gro
up o
f Vic
tim
Num
ber,
Per
cent
, and
Rat
e pe
r 10
0,00
0 P
opul
atio
n
Rac
e/et
hnic
gro
up
of
vic
tim
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Per
cent
chan
ge20
00-
2008
-20
0920
09T
otal
N
umbe
r of
vic
tims.
......
......
P
erce
nt o
f vic
tims.
.…...
.....
1
Pop
ulat
ion
......
...…
......
.....
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion.
......
.
Rat
e...…
....…
......
......
......
..
W
hite
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s.…
.....
Per
cent
of t
otal
vic
tims.
.1
P
opul
atio
n...
......
…...
......
..
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion.
...
R
ate.
....…
......
.…...
......
..
H
ispa
nic
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s…...
...
P
erce
nt o
f tot
al v
ictim
s..
1
Pop
ulat
ion
......
...…
......
.....
Per
cent
of p
opul
atio
n....
Rat
e....
.…...
..…...
......
....
B
lack
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s…...
...
P
erce
nt o
f tot
al v
ictim
s..
1
Pop
ulat
ion
......
...…
......
.....
Per
cent
of p
opul
atio
n....
Rat
e....
...…
..…...
......
.....
2
Oth
er
N
umbe
r of
vic
tims…
......
Per
cent
of t
otal
vic
tims.
.1
P
opul
atio
n...
......
…...
......
..
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion.
....
Rat
e…...
.…..…
…...
......
..
U
nkno
wn
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s..…
....
Per
cent
of t
otal
vic
tims.
.1
P
opul
atio
n...
......
…...
......
..
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion…
.
R
ate.
......
.…...
.….…
......
.
2,07
410
0.0%
34,4
80,0
0010
0.0% 6.
0
421
20.3
%17
,421
,511
50.3
% 2.4
933
45.0
%10
,688
,752
30.8
% 8.7
589
28.4
%2,
337,
935
6.7% 25
.2
121
5.8%
4,20
5,19
712
.1% 2.9 10
0.5%
- - -
2,20
110
0.0%
34,7
58,0
0010
0.0% 6.
3
442
20.1
%17
,503
,225
49.7
% 2.5
985
44.8
%11
,020
,710
31.3
% 8.9
622
28.3
%2,
355,
812
6.7% 26
.4
145
6.6%
4,35
3,58
812
.4% 3.3 7
0.3%
- - -
2,39
210
0.0%
35,3
01,0
0010
0.0% 6.
8
417
17.4
%17
,573
,850
49.1
% 2.4
1,06
644
.6%
11,3
52,8
5231
.7% 9.4
734
30.7
%2,
373,
399
6.6% 30
.9
166
6.9%
4,50
2,13
712
.6% 3.7 9
0.4%
- - -
2,40
210
0.0%
35,9
34,0
0010
0.0% 6.
7
444
18.5
%17
,635
,296
48.5
% 2.5
1,05
343
.8%
11,6
85,9
1532
.1% 9.0
713
29.7
%2,
390,
411
6.6% 29
.8
185
7.7%
4,65
1,88
012
.8% 4.0 7
0.3%
- - -
2,39
410
0.0%
36,5
90,8
1410
0.0% 6.
5
422
17.6
%15
,967
,775
43.9
% 2.6
1,03
443
.2%
12,8
16,0
3835
.2% 8.1
766
32.0
%2,
425,
066
6.7% 31
.6
167
7.0%
5,16
7,53
214
.2% 3.2 5
0.2%
- - -
2,50
310
0.0%
37,0
04,6
6110
0.0% 6.
8
419
16.7
%15
,852
,937
43.0
% 2.6
1,13
945
.5%
13,2
20,2
2335
.9% 8.6
758
30.3
%2,
456,
783
6.7% 30
.9
182
7.3%
5,32
4,28
114
.4% 3.4 5
0.2%
- - -
2,48
310
0.0%
37,4
44,3
8510
0.0% 6.
6
432
17.4
%15
,766
,736
42.2
% 2.7
1,12
945
.5%
13,6
03,7
5936
.4% 8.3
736
29.6
%2,
491,
247
6.7% 29
.5
178
7.2%
5,47
3,22
614
.7% 3.3 8
0.3%
- - -
2,25
810
0.0%
37,7
71,4
3110
0.0% 6.
0
372
16.5
%16
,423
,530
43.4
% 2.3
1,05
546
.7%
13,5
39,9
9035
.8% 7.8
665
29.5
%2,
263,
690
6.0% 29
.4
156
6.9%
5,58
3,37
214
.8% 2.8 10
0.4%
- - -
2,14
310
0.0%
38,1
48,4
9310
0.0% 5.
6
389
18.2
%16
,428
,238
43.0
% 2.4
1,00
346
.8%
13,8
58,4
5436
.3% 7.2
577
26.9
%2,
271,
258
6.0% 25
.4
159
7.4%
5,68
8,64
814
.9% 2.8 15
0.7%
- - -
1,97
010
0.0%
38,4
87,8
8910
0.0% 5.
1
392
19.9
%16
,433
,317
42.5
% 2.4
913
46.3
%14
,182
,666
36.8
% 6.4
534
27.1
%2,
279,
118
5.9% 23
.4
120
6.1%
5,79
3,19
215
.1% 2.1 11
0.6%
- - -
-5.0
-8.1
11.6
0.9
-15.
0-8
.9
-6.9
0.8
-5.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
-2.1
-9.0
32.7
2.3
-26.
4-1
1.1
-9.3
-7.5
-2.5
0.3
-7.1
-7.9
-0.8
-24.
5
37.8
1.8
-27.
6-2
5.0
--
--
--
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
R
ates
are
bas
ed o
n an
nual
pop
ulat
ion
estim
ates
pro
vide
d by
the
Dem
ogra
phic
Res
earc
h U
nit,
Cal
iforn
ia D
epar
tmen
t of F
inan
ce.
Rat
es a
re c
alcu
late
d us
ing
the
popu
latio
n fo
r ea
ch s
ubgr
oup
show
n; th
eref
ore,
they
will
not
add
to th
e ra
te c
alcu
late
d fo
r th
e to
tal p
opul
atio
n.
P
opul
atio
n br
eakd
owns
by
race
/eth
nic
grou
p w
ill n
ot a
dd to
tota
l bec
ause
of v
aria
tions
in p
opul
atio
n so
urce
dat
a.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at th
e pe
rcen
t of p
opul
atio
n an
d ra
te fo
r th
e "u
nkno
wn"
cat
egor
y ca
nnot
be
calc
ulat
ed b
ecau
se th
ere
are
no u
nkno
wn
race
/eth
nic
grou
p po
pula
tion
data
.
D
ash
may
als
o in
dica
te th
at a
per
cent
cha
nge
is n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
T
he "
perc
ent o
f pop
ulat
ion"
cat
egor
y fo
r ra
ce/e
thni
c gr
oup
was
cal
cula
ted
usin
g th
e su
m o
f the
rac
e/et
hnic
gro
up p
opul
atio
ns.
1B
egin
ning
in 2
004,
pop
ulat
ion
estim
ates
are
bas
ed o
n th
e 20
00 C
ensu
s. P
revi
ous
popu
latio
n es
timat
es a
re b
ased
on
revi
sion
s of
the
1990
Cen
sus.
Rea
ders
are
adv
ised
to e
xerc
ise
care
in in
terp
retin
g ch
ange
s in
p
erce
nt a
nd r
ate
betw
een
dece
nnia
l cen
sus
sam
ples
.
2 Beg
inni
ng in
200
4, th
e "o
ther
" ca
tego
ry in
clud
es th
e ne
w r
ace/
ethn
ic g
roup
of "
mul
ti-ra
cial
." T
he e
xten
t to
whi
ch th
is n
ew r
ace/
ethn
ic g
roup
effe
cts
othe
r po
pula
tion
estim
ates
is n
ot k
now
n.
49
Tab
le 4
H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y A
ge o
f Vic
tim
Num
ber,
Per
cent
, and
Rat
e pe
r 10
0,00
0 P
opul
atio
n
Age
of
vic
tim
20
00
20
0120
0220
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
09
Per
cent
chan
ge20
00-
2008
-20
0920
09T
otal
N
umbe
r of
vic
tims.
......
…
Per
cent
of v
ictim
s....
......
.1
P
opul
atio
n...
.....…
......
.....
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion.
.…
Rat
e....
......
......
...…
.…...
.
U
nder
18
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s....
....
Per
cent
of t
otal
vic
tims.
1
Pop
ulat
ion
......
..…...
......
..
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion.
..
R
ate.
......
.…...
..…...
......
18
-29
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s....
....
Per
cent
of t
otal
vic
tims.
1
Pop
ulat
ion
......
..…...
......
..
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion.
..
R
ate.
......
.…...
..…...
......
30
-39
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s....
....
Per
cent
of t
otal
vic
tims.
1
Pop
ulat
ion
......
..…...
......
..
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion.
..
R
ate.
......
.…...
..…...
......
40
and
ove
r
N
umbe
r of
vic
tims.
......
.
P
erce
nt o
f tot
al v
ictim
s.1
P
opul
atio
n...
.....…
......
.....
Per
cent
of p
opul
atio
n...
Rat
e....
....…
.....…
......
...
U
nkno
wn
Num
ber
of v
ictim
s....
....
Per
cent
of t
otal
vic
tims.
1
Pop
ulat
ion
......
..…...
......
..
P
erce
nt o
f pop
ulat
ion.
..
R
ate.
......
.…...
..…...
......
2,07
410
0.0%
34,4
80,0
0010
0.0% 6.
0
246
11.9
%9,
770,
687
28.2
% 2.5
888
42.8
%5,
523,
472
15.9
%16
.1
377
18.2
%5,
597,
411
16.2
% 6.7
534
25.7
%13
,761
,825
39.7
% 3.9 29
1.4%
- - -
2,20
110
0.0%
34,7
58,0
0010
0.0% 6.
3
252
11.4
%9,
932,
913
28.2
% 2.5
992
45.1
%5,
555,
926
15.8
%17
.9
426
19.4
%5,
535,
620
15.7
% 7.7
519
23.6
%14
,208
,876
40.3
% 3.7 12
0.5%
- - -
2,39
210
0.0%
35,3
01,0
0010
0.0% 6.
8
247
10.3
%10
,095
,903
28.2
% 2.4
1,09
845
.9%
6,12
3,03
717
.1%
17.9
449
18.8
%4,
994,
720
14.0
% 9.0
579
24.2
%14
,588
,578
40.7
% 4.0 19
0.8%
- - -
2,40
210
0.0%
35,9
34,0
0010
0.0% 6.
7
240
10.0
%10
,248
,237
28.2
% 2.3
1,10
045
.8%
5,74
0,60
615
.8%
19.2
486
20.2
%5,
384,
170
14.8
% 9.0
560
23.3
%14
,990
,489
41.2
% 3.7 16
0.7%
- - -
2,39
410
0.0%
36,5
90,8
1410
0.0% 6.
5
269
11.2
%9,
575,
520
26.3
% 2.8
1,11
046
.4%
6,16
0,38
616
.9%
18.0
446
18.6
%5,
534,
220
15.2
% 8.1
569
23.8
%15
,106
,285
41.5
% 3.8 0
0.0%
- - -
2,50
310
0.0%
37,0
04,6
6110
0.0% 6.
8
285
11.4
%9,
620,
511
26.1
% 3.0
1,15
146
.0%
6,26
0,10
317
.0%
18.4
473
18.9
%5,
516,
751
15.0
% 8.6
579
23.1
%15
,456
,859
41.9
% 3.7 15
0.6%
- - -
2,48
310
0.0%
37,4
44,3
8510
0.0% 6.
6
316
12.7
%9,
664,
747
25.9
% 3.3
1,14
746
.2%
6,36
9,55
917
.1%
18.0
418
16.8
%5,
516,
609
14.8
% 7.6
586
23.6
%15
,784
,053
42.3
% 3.7 16
0.6%
- - -
2,25
810
0.0%
37,7
71,4
3110
0.0% 6.
0
270
12.0
%10
,007
,501
26.5
% 2.7
998
44.2
%6,
321,
492
16.7
%15
.8
432
19.1
%5,
335,
897
14.1
% 8.1
552
24.4
%16
,145
,692
42.7
% 3.4 6
0.3%
- - -
2,14
310
0.0%
38,1
48,4
9310
0.0% 5.
6
273
12.7
%10
,003
,896
26.2
% 2.7
906
42.3
%6,
500,
288
17.0
%13
.9
381
17.8
%5,
278,
097
13.8
% 7.2
569
26.6
%16
,464
,317
43.0
% 3.5 14
0.7%
- - -
1,97
010
0.0%
38,4
87,8
8910
0.0% 5.
1
242
12.3
%9,
992,
333
25.8
% 2.4
838
42.5
%6,
686,
543
17.3
%12
.5
353
17.9
%5,
214,
480
13.5
% 6.8
528
26.8
%16
,794
,937
43.4
% 3.1 9
0.5%
- - -
-5.0
-8.1
11.6
0.9
-15.
0-8
.9
-1.6
-11.
4
2.3
-0.1
-4.0
-11.
1
-5.6
-7.5
21.1
2.9
-22.
4-1
0.1
-6.4
-7.3
-6.8
-1.2
1.5
-5.6
-1.1
-7.2
22.0
2.0
-20.
5-1
1.4
--
--
--
Not
es:
Per
cent
ages
may
not
add
to 1
00.0
bec
ause
of r
ound
ing.
R
ates
are
bas
ed o
n an
nual
pop
ulat
ion
estim
ates
pro
vide
d by
the
Dem
ogra
phic
Res
earc
h U
nit,
Cal
iforn
ia D
epar
tmen
t of F
inan
ce.
R
ates
are
cal
cula
ted
usin
g th
e po
pula
tion
for
each
sub
grou
p sh
own;
ther
efor
e, th
ey w
ill n
ot a
dd to
the
rate
cal
cula
ted
for
the
tota
l pop
ulat
ion.
P
opul
atio
n br
eakd
owns
by
age
will
not
add
to to
tal b
ecau
se o
f var
iatio
ns in
pop
ulat
ion
sour
ce d
ata.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at th
e pe
rcen
t of p
opul
atio
n an
d ra
te fo
r th
e "u
nkno
wn"
cat
egor
y ca
nnot
be
calc
ulat
ed b
ecau
se th
ere
are
no u
nkno
wn
age
popu
latio
n da
ta.
D
ash
may
als
o in
dica
te th
at a
per
cent
cha
nge
is n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
The
"pe
rcen
t of p
opul
atio
n" c
ateg
ory
for
age
grou
p w
as c
alcu
late
d us
ing
the
sum
of t
he a
ge p
opul
atio
ns.
1
Beg
inni
ng in
200
4, p
opul
atio
n es
timat
es a
re b
ased
on
the
2000
Cen
sus.
Pre
viou
s po
pula
tion
estim
ates
are
bas
ed o
n re
visi
ons
of th
e 19
90 C
ensu
s. R
eade
rs a
re a
dvis
ed to
exe
rcis
e ca
re i
n in
terp
retin
g ch
ange
s i
n pe
rcen
t and
rat
e be
twee
n de
cenn
ial c
ensu
s sa
mpl
es.
50
Tab
le 5
HO
MIC
IDE
CR
IME
S, 2
000-
2009
By
Gen
der
of V
ictim
Yea
r(s)
Tota
l1
Mal
eF
emal
eN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt
2009
......
......
...20
08...
......
......
2007
......
......
...20
06...
......
......
2005
......
......
...
2004
......
......
...20
03...
......
......
2002
......
......
...20
01...
......
......
2000
......
......
...
1,97
010
0.0
2,14
310
0.0
2,25
810
0.0
2,48
310
0.0
2,50
310
0.0
2,39
410
0.0
2,40
210
0.0
2,39
210
0.0
2,20
110
0.0
2,07
410
0.0
1,61
982
.21,
766
82.4
1,86
582
.62,
070
83.4
2,10
183
.9
1,99
283
.21,
972
82.1
1,93
881
.01,
756
79.8
1,66
680
.3
351
17.8
377
17.6
393
17.4
413
16.6
402
16.1
402
16.8
430
17.9
454
19.0
445
20.2
408
19.7
1 The
"m
ale"
cat
egor
y in
clud
es h
omic
ide
vict
ims
who
se g
ende
r co
uld
not b
e de
term
ined
:
200
0 in
clud
es tw
o, 2
001
incl
udes
one
, and
200
2 in
clud
es o
ne.
Tab
le 6
HO
MIC
IDE
CR
IME
S, 2
000-
2009
By
Rac
e/E
thni
c G
roup
of V
ictim
Yea
r(s)
Tot
alin
clud
ing
unkn
own
Unk
now
nK
now
n ra
ce/e
thni
c gr
oup
of v
ictim
Tot
alW
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt
2009
......
.....
2008
......
.....
2007
......
.....
2006
......
.....
2005
......
.....
2004
......
.....
2003
......
.....
2002
......
.....
2001
......
.....
2000
......
.....
1,97
02,
143
2,25
82,
483
2,50
3
2,39
42,
402
2,39
22,
201
2,07
4
11 15 10 8 5 5 7 9 7 10
1,95
910
0.0
2,12
810
0.0
2,24
810
0.0
2,47
510
0.0
2,49
810
0.0
2,38
910
0.0
2,39
510
0.0
2,38
310
0.0
2,19
410
0.0
2,06
410
0.0
392
20.0
389
18.3
372
16.5
432
17.5
419
16.8
422
17.7
444
18.5
417
17.5
442
20.1
421
20.4
913
46.6
1,00
347
.11,
055
46.9
1,12
945
.61,
139
45.6
1,03
443
.31,
053
44.0
1,06
644
.798
544
.993
345
.2
534
27.3
577
27.1
665
29.6
736
29.7
758
30.3
766
32.1
713
29.8
734
30.8
622
28.4
589
28.5
120
6.1
159
7.5
156
6.9
178
7.2
182
7.3
167
7.0
185
7.7
166
7.0
145
6.6
121
5.9
Not
e: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
51
Tab
le 7
HO
MIC
IDE
CR
IME
S, 2
000-
2009
By
Age
of V
ictim
Yea
r(s)
Tot
al
in
clud
ing
un
know
n
Unk
now
nK
now
n ag
e of
vic
timT
otal
Und
er 1
818
-29
30-3
940
and
ove
rN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt20
09...
......
.....
2008
......
......
..20
07...
......
.....
2006
......
......
..20
05...
......
.....
2004
......
......
..20
03...
......
.....
2002
......
......
..20
01...
......
.....
2000
......
......
..
1,97
02,
143
2,25
82,
483
2,50
3
2,39
42,
402
2,39
22,
201
2,07
4
9 14 6 16 15 0 16 19 12 29
1,96
110
0.0
2,12
910
0.0
2,25
210
0.0
2,46
710
0.0
2,48
810
0.0
2,39
410
0.0
2,38
610
0.0
2,37
310
0.0
2,18
910
0.0
2,04
510
0.0
242
12.3
273
12.8
270
12.0
316
12.8
285
11.5
269
11.2
240
10.1
247
10.4
252
11.5
246
12.0
838
42.7
906
42.6
998
44.3
1,14
746
.51,
151
46.3
1,11
046
.41,
100
46.1
1,09
846
.399
245
.388
843
.4
353
18.0
381
17.9
432
19.2
418
16.9
473
19.0
446
18.6
486
20.4
449
18.9
426
19.5
377
18.4
528
26.9
569
26.7
552
24.5
586
23.8
579
23.3
569
23.8
560
23.5
579
24.4
519
23.7
534
26.1
Not
e: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
Tab
le 8
HO
MIC
IDE
CR
IME
S, 2
009
Rac
e/E
thni
c G
roup
of V
ictim
by
Gen
der
of V
ictim
Gen
der
of v
ictim
Tot
alW
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erU
nkno
wn
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tot
al...
......
......
.
M
ale.
......
......
F
emal
e....
.....
1,97
010
0.0
1,61
982
.235
117
.8
392
100.
0
267
68.1
125
31.9
913
100.
0
789
86.4
124
13.6
534
100.
0
465
87.1
6912
.9
120
100.
0
8974
.231
25.8
1110
0.0
9-
2-
Not
e: D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at p
erce
nt d
istr
ibut
ions
are
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
52
Tab
le 9
HO
MIC
IDE
CR
IME
S, 2
009
Rac
e/E
thni
c G
roup
of V
ictim
by
Age
of V
ictim
Age
of
vic
tim
Tot
al
W
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erU
nkno
wn
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
..…
Unk
now
n..…
...…
......
.....…
T
otal
kno
wn.
..…...
......
..…
U
nder
18.
...…
......
.....…
18-2
9.…
...…
......
.....…
..
30
-39.
…...
…...
......
..…..
40 a
nd o
ver.
..…...
......
..
1,97
0 9-
1,96
110
0.0
242
12.3
838
42.7
353
18.0
528
26.9
392 0
-
392
100.
033
8.4
9825
.050
12.8
211
53.8
913 2
-
911
100.
013
014
.344
448
.717
218
.916
518
.1
534 1
-
533
100.
067
12.6
251
47.1
107
20.1
108
20.3
120 0
-
120
100.
012
10.0
4335
.824
20.0
4134
.2
11 6-
510
0.0
0-
2-
0-
3-
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at p
erce
nt d
istr
ibut
ions
are
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
53
Tab
le 1
0H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9R
ace/
Eth
nic
Gro
up o
f Vic
tim b
y G
ende
r an
d A
ge o
f Vic
tim
Gen
der
and
age
of v
ictim
Tot
alW
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erU
nkno
wn
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tot
al.…
......
......
...
Und
er 1
8....
.....
18
-19.
..…...
.....
20
-24.
.…...
......
25
-29.
.…...
......
30
-34.
.…...
......
35
-39.
.…...
......
40
-44.
..…...
.....
45
-49.
...…
......
.
50-5
4....
.…...
...
55 a
nd o
ver.
....
U
nkno
wn…
......
M
ale.
.....…
......
.
U
nder
18.
.....
18-1
9...…
.....
20-2
4...…
.....
25-2
9...…
.....
30-3
4...…
.....
35-3
9...…
.....
40-4
4...…
.....
45-4
9...…
.....
50-5
4...…
.....
55 a
nd o
ver.
.
Unk
now
n....
..
F
emal
e…...
.....
Und
er 1
8....
..
18
-19.
..…...
..
20
-24.
..…...
..
25
-29.
..…...
..
30
-34.
..…...
..
35-3
9...…
.....
40-4
4...…
.....
45-4
9...…
.....
50-5
4...…
.....
55 a
nd o
ver.
.
Unk
now
n…...
1,97
010
0.0
242
12.3
194
9.8
396
20.1
248
12.6
211
10.7
142
7.2
120
6.1
139
7.1
864.
418
39.
3
90.
5
1,61
910
0.0
176
10.9
178
11.0
355
21.9
206
12.7
181
11.2
117
7.2
965.
910
96.
770
4.3
124
7.7
70.
4
351
100.
066
18.8
164.
641
11.7
4212
.030
8.5
257.
124
6.8
308.
516
4.6
5916
.8
20.
6
392
100.
033
8.4
184.
637
9.4
4311
.026
6.6
246.
139
9.9
4611
.728
7.1
9825
.0
00.
0
267
100.
020
7.5
166.
031
11.6
259.
420
7.5
176.
425
9.4
3412
.719
7.1
6022
.5
00.
0
125
100.
013
10.4
21.
66
4.8
1814
.46
4.8
75.
614
11.2
129.
69
7.2
3830
.4
00.
0
913
100.
013
014
.211
112
.221
523
.511
812
.910
211
.2
707.
748
5.3
535.
827
3.0
374.
1
20.
2
789
100.
098
12.4
104
13.2
199
25.2
104
13.2
8610
.9
587.
442
5.3
394.
925
3.2
324.
1
20.
3
124
100.
032
25.8
75.
616
12.9
1411
.316
12.9
129.
76
4.8
1411
.32
1.6
54.
0
00.
0
534
100.
067
12.5
5911
.012
022
.572
13.5
7313
.7
346.
422
4.1
305.
623
4.3
336.
2
10.
2
465
100.
052
11.2
5211
.210
622
.865
14.0
6814
.6
316.
720
4.3
296.
219
4.1
224.
7
10.
2
6910
0.0
1521
.77
10.1
1420
.37
10.1
57.
2
34.
32
2.9
11.
44
5.8
1115
.9
00.
0
120
100.
012
10.0
65.
024
20.0
1310
.810
8.3
1411
.79
7.5
97.
58
6.7
1512
.5
00.
0
8910
0.0
66.
76
6.7
1921
.310
11.2
77.
9
1112
.47
7.9
66.
77
7.9
1011
.2
00.
0
3110
0.0
6 -
0 -
5 -
3 -
3 -
3 -
2 -
3 -
1 -
5 -
0 -
1110
0.0
0-
0-
0-
2-
0-
0-
2-
1-
0-
0-
6-
910
0.0
0-
0-
0-
2-
0-
0-
2-
1-
0-
0-
4-
210
0.0
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
2-
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
per
cent
dis
trib
utio
ns a
re n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
54
Tab
le 1
1H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y R
elat
ions
hip
of V
ictim
to O
ffend
er
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Rel
atio
nshi
p
of
vic
tim to
offe
nder
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own…
.....
2,07
42,
201
2,39
22,
402
2,39
4
Unk
now
n....
...…
......
......
......
.79
690
096
91,
109
1,01
8
T
otal
kno
wn.
.…...
......
......
.....
1,27
810
0.0
1,30
110
0.0
1,42
310
0.0
1,29
310
0.0
1,37
610
0.0
1
F
riend
, acq
uain
tanc
e…
...60
147
.059
645
.866
346
.660
146
.566
748
.5
S
pous
e, p
aren
t, ch
ild…
....
207
16.2
183
14.1
204
14.3
198
15.3
174
12.6
2
Spo
use
......
.....…
......
.....
115
9.0
876.
797
6.8
937.
284
6.1
P
aren
t, ch
ild3 .…
......
......
.92
7.2
967.
410
77.
510
58.
190
6.5
All
othe
r re
lativ
es...
......
.....
403.
149
3.8
423.
052
4.0
463.
3
S
tran
ger.
...…
......
......
......
..43
033
.647
336
.451
436
.144
234
.248
935
.5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Per
cent
cha
nge
Rel
atio
nshi
p
20
00-
2008
-of
vic
tim to
offe
nder
(co
nt.)
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
2009
2009
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own…
.....
2,50
32,
483
2,25
82,
143
1,97
0
Unk
now
n....
...…
......
......
......
.1,
082
1,10
91,
131
1,03
087
8
T
otal
kno
wn.
.…...
......
......
.....
1,42
110
0.0
1,37
410
0.0
1,12
710
0.0
1,11
310
0.0
1,09
210
0.0
-14.
6-1
.91
Frie
nd, a
cqua
inta
nce
…...
548
38.6
593
43.2
475
42.1
540
48.5
572
52.4
-4.8
5.9
Spo
use,
par
ent,
child
…...
.17
412
.218
013
.115
513
.816
915
.216
014
.7-2
2.7
-5.3
2
Spo
use
......
.....…
......
.....
775.
486
6.3
766.
771
6.4
645.
9-4
4.3
-9.9
P
aren
t, ch
ild3 .…
......
......
.97
6.8
946.
879
7.0
988.
896
8.8
4.3
-2.0
All
othe
r re
lativ
es...
......
.....
614.
343
3.1
403.
568
6.1
343.
1-
-50.
0
S
tran
ger.
...…
......
......
......
..63
844
.955
840
.645
740
.633
630
.232
629
.9-2
4.2
-3.0
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
a p
erce
nt c
hang
e is
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
1 In
clud
es e
x-hu
sban
d, e
x-w
ife, e
mpl
oyer
, em
ploy
ee, g
ang
mem
ber,
etc
.
2 Incl
udes
"co
mm
on-la
w"
mar
riage
par
tner
.
3 Incl
udes
ste
pmot
her,
ste
pfat
her,
ste
pdau
ghte
r, a
nd s
teps
on.
55
Tab
le 1
2H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9G
ende
r an
d R
ace/
Eth
nic
Gro
up o
f Vic
tim b
y R
elat
ions
hip
of V
ictim
to O
ffend
er
Rel
atio
nshi
pof
vic
tim to
offe
nder
Tot
alG
ende
rR
ace/
ethn
ic g
roup
Mal
eF
emal
eW
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erU
nkno
wn
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
......
.
Unk
now
n....
..…...
…...
......
...
T
otal
kno
wn.
..…...
......
......
..1
Frie
nd, a
cqua
inta
nce
.....
Spo
use,
par
ent,
child
…...
2
Spo
use
......
..…...
......
...
Par
ent,
child
3 .…...
......
..
A
ll ot
her
rela
tives
..……
....
Str
ange
r....
...…
..…...
......
.
1,97
087
8
1,09
257
216
0 64 96 34 326
1,61
935
179
880
821
271
455
117
4911
14
6045
5123
1129
432
392
913
534
120
1111
540
930
146
7
277
504
233
744
148
285
104
323
6349
3513
028
228
60
3527
277
012
105
70
5416
089
221
Per
cent
bas
ed o
n to
tal k
now
n
Tot
al k
now
n...…
......
......
.....
1
F
riend
, acq
uain
tanc
e...
..
S
pous
e, p
aren
t, ch
ild…
...2
S
pous
e...
.....…
......
......
P
aren
t, ch
ild3 …
......
......
All
othe
r re
lativ
es..…
…...
.
S
tran
ger.
......
…..…
......
....
100.
052
.414
.7 5.9
8.8
3.1
29.9
100.
010
0.0
55.4
43.2
6.0
41.0
0.5
22.1
5.5
18.8
2.8
4.1
35.8
11.8
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
053
.456
.544
.643
.2-
22.7
9.7
15.0
17.6
-10
.14.
43.
48.
1-
12.6
5.4
11.6
9.5
-4.
32.
02.
19.
5-
19.5
31.7
38.2
29.7
-
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at p
erce
nt d
istr
ibut
ions
are
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
1 In
clud
es e
x-hu
sban
d, e
x-w
ife, e
mpl
oyer
, em
ploy
ee, g
ang
mem
ber,
etc
.
2 Incl
udes
"co
mm
on-la
w"
mar
riage
par
tner
.
3 Incl
udes
ste
pmot
her,
ste
pfat
her,
ste
pdau
ghte
r, a
nd s
teps
on.
56
Tab
le 1
3H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9A
ge o
f Vic
tim b
y R
elat
ions
hip
of V
ictim
to O
ffend
er
Rel
atio
nshi
p
of v
ictim
to o
ffend
er
T
otal
Und
er18
18-2
930
-39
40an
d ov
erU
nkno
wn
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
......
.
Unk
now
n....
......
......
......
.....
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
....
1
F
riend
, acq
uain
tanc
e…
.
S
pous
e, p
aren
t, ch
ild…
..2
S
pous
e...
......
......
......
..
Par
ent,
child
3 ......
…...
..
A
ll ot
her
rela
tives
…...
.....
Str
ange
r....
......
......
......
....
1,97
087
81,
092
572
160 64 96 34 326
242 73 169 63 60 0 60 4 42
838
428
410
244 17 11 6 7
142
353
175
178
100 18 15 3 6 54
528
195
333
165 65 38 27 17 86
9 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 2P
erce
nt b
ased
on
tota
l kno
wn
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
....
1
F
riend
, acq
uain
tanc
e…
.
S
pous
e, p
aren
t, ch
ild…
..2
S
pous
e...
......
......
......
..
Par
ent,
child
3 ......
…...
..
A
ll ot
her
rela
tives
…...
.....
Str
ange
r....
......
......
......
....
100.
052
.414
.7 5.9
8.8
3.1
29.9
100.
037
.335
.5 0.0
35.5 2.4
24.9
100.
059
.5 4.1
2.7
1.5
1.7
34.6
100.
056
.210
.1 8.4
1.7
3.4
30.3
100.
049
.519
.511
.4 8.1
5.1
25.8
100.
0 - - - - - -
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
per
cent
dis
trib
utio
ns a
re n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
1 Incl
udes
ex-
husb
and,
ex-
wife
, em
ploy
er, e
mpl
oyee
, gan
g m
embe
r, e
tc.
2 In
clud
es "
com
mon
-law
" m
arria
ge p
artn
er.
3
Incl
udes
ste
pmot
her,
ste
pfat
her,
ste
pdau
ghte
r, a
nd s
teps
on.
57
Tab
le 1
4H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y C
ount
yN
umbe
r an
d R
ate
per
100,
000
Pop
ulat
ion
Cou
nty
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Num
ber
Sta
tew
ide
tota
l.…...
2,07
42,
201
2,39
22,
402
2,39
42,
503
2,48
32,
258
2,14
31,
970
A
lam
eda.
...…
......
110
108
144
139
117
126
172
152
147
138
A
lpin
e....
....…
......
00
00
00
01
10
A
mad
or...
......
......
10
00
20
20
01
B
utte
..…...
......
....
811
59
610
119
710
C
alav
eras
...…
....
42
22
32
10
21
C
olus
a....
......
......
40
00
00
01
11
C
ontr
a C
osta
.…..
5649
4874
7680
9398
7689
D
el N
orte
......
......
11
20
11
02
01
E
l Dor
ado.
.…...
...3
54
22
54
48
3
Fre
sno.
......
......
...38
6162
5969
7774
7365
69
G
lenn
......
......
......
10
02
00
12
20
H
umbo
ldt..
......
....
47
128
53
53
38
Im
peria
l.....
......
....
45
312
40
34
83
In
yo...
......
……
.....
10
02
01
00
02
K
ern.
.....…
......
....
3739
5146
5169
6550
5775
K
ings
.....…
......
....
31
45
64
47
74
La
ke...
...…
......
....
51
41
11
75
54
La
ssen
......
......
....
00
00
03
10
11
Lo
s A
ngel
es…
....
1,00
01,
070
1,16
21,
053
1,03
81,
068
1,01
286
380
669
9
Mad
era.
…...
......
..10
156
77
102
510
3
M
arin
....…
......
.....
53
40
33
31
54
M
arip
osa.
......
......
00
00
10
10
10
M
endo
cino
......
....
54
49
64
66
75
M
erce
d.…
......
.....
65
1816
1622
2217
2126
M
odoc
..…...
......
..0
10
00
00
10
0
M
ono.
...…
......
.....
10
01
00
00
00
M
onte
rey.
......
......
2526
2827
3314
1529
3651
N
apa.
...…
......
......
31
22
31
26
11
N
evad
a..…
......
....
16
32
12
22
11
O
rang
e.…
......
.....
5663
7764
8177
7977
7269
(con
tinue
d)
58
Tab
le 1
4 -
cont
inue
dH
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y C
ount
yN
umbe
r an
d R
ate
per
100,
000
Pop
ulat
ion
Cou
nty
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Num
ber
P
lace
r..…
.…...
.....
53
010
35
64
36
P
lum
as…
......
......
11
02
20
01
31
R
iver
side
…...
......
7993
111
9493
109
109
105
9091
S
acra
men
to…
.....
7578
8383
9211
099
9197
70
San
Ben
ito…
......
.3
61
20
12
53
0
S
an B
erna
rdin
o…14
512
514
116
316
517
416
115
911
912
1
San
Die
go…
.…...
.97
9287
129
127
9812
610
790
75
San
Fra
ncis
co...
...59
6268
6988
9686
100
9845
S
an J
oaqu
in.…
....
3950
5958
5556
5745
3551
S
an L
uis
Obi
spo.
.3
73
72
46
54
4
S
an M
ateo
.…...
....
1018
2120
2630
2213
1816
S
anta
Bar
bara
…..
1012
84
79
1310
1411
S
anta
Cla
ra…
......
3434
3748
3743
3746
5046
S
anta
Cru
z…...
....
913
613
55
166
810
S
hast
a....
.…...
...…
35
55
44
811
43
S
ierr
a....
....…
......
..0
00
10
00
00
0
Sis
kiyo
u....
…...
.....
11
42
14
02
11
S
olan
o….…
.…...
..21
1016
2019
2914
3124
20
Son
oma.
…...
......
.11
1216
1217
511
812
9
Sta
nisl
aus.
…...
....
1634
1527
4230
2927
3146
S
utte
r....
....…
......
.2
57
33
34
24
1
Teh
ama.
.…...
......
53
21
33
51
03
T
rinity
......
..…...
....
20
01
11
01
00
T
ular
e....
....…
......
1726
2930
2554
4938
4331
T
uolu
mne
…...
.....
21
24
23
01
11
V
entu
ra..…
…...
....
2419
2142
3332
2917
3129
Y
olo.
......
...…
......
..6
45
55
44
44
7
Yub
a....
.....…
......
..3
30
55
83
06
3(c
ontin
ued)
59
Tab
le 1
4 -
cont
inue
dH
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y C
ount
yN
umbe
r an
d R
ate
per
100,
000
Pop
ulat
ion
Cou
nty
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Rat
e pe
r 10
0,00
0 po
pula
tion
Sta
tew
ide
tota
l.…...
6.0
6.3
6.8
6.7
6.5
6.8
6.6
6.0
5.6
5.1
A
lam
eda.
...…
......
7.5
7.3
9.7
9.3
7.8
8.4
11.4
9.9
9.5
8.8
A
lpin
e....
....…
......
--
--
--
--
--
A
mad
or...
......
......
--
--
--
--
--
B
utte
..…...
......
....
3.9
5.3
2.4
4.2
2.8
4.6
5.1
4.1
3.2
4.5
C
alav
eras
...…
....
--
--
--
--
--
C
olus
a....
......
......
--
--
--
--
--
C
ontr
a C
osta
.…..
5.8
5.0
4.9
7.4
7.5
7.8
9.0
9.4
7.2
8.3
D
el N
orte
......
......
--
--
--
--
--
E
l Dor
ado.
.…...
...1.
93.
12.
41.
21.
22.
82.
22.
24.
41.
7
Fre
sno.
......
......
...4.
77.
47.
46.
97.
98.
68.
17.
96.
97.
3
G
lenn
......
......
......
--
--
--
--
--
H
umbo
ldt..
......
....
3.1
5.5
9.4
6.2
3.8
2.3
3.8
2.3
2.3
6.0
Im
peria
l.....
......
....
2.7
3.3
2.0
7.8
2.5
-1.
82.
34.
51.
7
Inyo
......
...…
…...
..-
--
--
--
--
-
Ker
n....
..…...
......
.5.
55.
77.
36.
46.
98.
98.
26.
26.
99.
0
K
ings
.....…
......
....
2.2
0.8
3.0
3.6
4.2
2.7
2.7
4.6
4.5
2.6
La
ke...
...…
......
....
--
--
--
--
--
La
ssen
......
......
....
--
--
--
--
--
Lo
s A
ngel
es…
....
10.3
11.0
11.7
10.5
10.2
10.4
9.8
8.4
7.8
6.7
M
ader
a.…
......
.....
7.8
11.5
4.6
5.2
5.0
7.0
1.4
3.3
6.6
2.0
M
arin
....…
......
.....
2.0
1.2
1.6
0.0
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.4
1.9
1.5
M
arip
osa.
......
......
--
--
--
--
--
M
endo
cino
......
....
--
--
--
--
--
M
erce
d.…
......
.....
2.8
2.3
8.1
6.9
6.7
9.0
8.8
6.7
8.2
10.1
M
odoc
..…...
......
..-
--
--
--
--
-
M
ono.
...…
......
.....
--
--
--
--
--
M
onte
rey.
......
......
6.1
6.4
6.8
6.4
7.8
3.3
3.5
6.8
8.4
11.8
N
apa.
...…
......
......
2.4
0.8
1.6
1.5
2.3
0.7
1.5
4.4
0.7
0.7
N
evad
a..…
......
....
--
--
-2.
0-
--
-
Ora
nge.
…...
......
..1.
92.
22.
62.
12.
72.
52.
62.
52.
32.
2(c
ontin
ued)
60
Tab
le 1
4 -
cont
inue
dH
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y C
ount
yN
umbe
r an
d R
ate
per
100,
000
Pop
ulat
ion
Cou
nty
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Rat
e pe
r 10
0,00
0 po
pula
tion
P
lace
r..…
.…...
.....
P
lum
as…
......
......
R
iver
side
…...
......
S
acra
men
to…
.....
S
an B
enito
…...
....
S
an B
erna
rdin
o…
San
Die
go…
.…...
.
San
Fra
ncis
co...
...
San
Joa
quin
.…...
.
San
Lui
s O
bisp
o..
S
an M
ateo
.…...
....
S
anta
Bar
bara
…..
S
anta
Cla
ra…
......
S
anta
Cru
z…...
....
S
hast
a....
.…...
...…
S
ierr
a....
....…
......
..
Sis
kiyo
u....
…...
.....
S
olan
o….…
.…...
..
Son
oma.
…...
......
.
Sta
nisl
aus.
…...
....
S
utte
r....
....…
......
.
Teh
ama.
.…...
......
T
rinity
......
..…...
....
T
ular
e....
....…
......
T
uolu
mne
…...
.....
V
entu
ra..…
…...
....
Y
olo.
......
...…
......
..
Yub
a....
.....…
......
..
2.0 -
5.0
6.0 -
8.3
3.4
7.5
6.8
1.2
1.4
2.5
2.0
3.5
1.8 - -
5.2
2.4
3.5 - - -
4.5 -
3.1
3.5 -
1.1 -
5.7
6.2 -
7.1
3.2
7.9
8.5
2.8
2.5
3.0
2.0
5.0
3.0 - -
2.5
2.6
7.3 - - -
6.9 -
2.5
2.3 -
0.0 -
6.6
6.4 -
7.8
3.0
8.6
9.7
1.2
2.9
2.0
2.2
2.3
2.9 - -
3.9
3.4
3.1 - - -
7.6 -
2.7
2.8 -
3.5 -
5.3
6.2 -
8.7
4.3
8.8
9.3
2.7
2.8
1.0
2.8
5.0
2.8 - -
4.8
2.5
5.5 - - -
7.6 -
5.3
2.7 -
1.0 -
5.0
6.8 -
8.5
4.2
11.1 8.5
0.8
3.6
1.7
2.1
1.9
2.3 - -
4.5
3.6
8.4 - - -
6.2 -
4.1
2.7 -
1.6 -
5.6
8.0 -
8.8
3.2
12.1 8.4
1.5
4.2
2.1
2.4
1.9
2.2 - -
6.9
1.0
5.9 - - -
12.9 -
3.9
2.1 -
1.9 -
5.4
7.1 -
8.0
4.1
10.7 8.5
2.3
3.0
3.1
2.1
6.1
4.4 - -
3.3
2.3
5.6 - - -
11.5 -
3.5
2.1 -
1.2 -
5.1
6.4 -
7.8
3.4
12.2 6.6
1.9
1.8
2.3
2.5
2.3
6.1 - -
7.3
1.7
5.2 - - -
8.8 -
2.1
2.0 -
0.9 -
4.3
6.8 -
5.8
2.8
11.6 5.1
1.5
2.4
3.3
2.7
3.0
2.2 - -
5.6
2.5
5.9 - - -
9.8 -
3.7
2.0 -
1.7 -
4.3
4.9 -
5.9
2.3
5.3
7.4
1.5
2.1
2.5
2.5
3.7
1.6 - -
4.7
1.8
8.7 - - -
7.0 -
3.4
3.5 -
Not
es: D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at a
rat
e is
not
com
pute
d w
hen
a co
unty
's p
opul
atio
n is
less
than
100
,000
in a
giv
en y
ear.
Rat
es a
re b
ased
on
annu
al p
opul
atio
n es
timat
es p
rovi
ded
by th
e D
emog
raph
ic R
esea
rch
Uni
t, C
alifo
rnia
Dep
artm
ent o
f Fin
ance
.
R
ates
are
cal
cula
ted
usin
g th
e po
pula
tion
for
each
cou
nty
show
n; th
eref
ore,
they
will
not
add
to th
e ra
te c
alcu
late
d fo
r th
e st
ate.
61
Tab
le 1
5H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y S
easo
n an
d M
onth
of I
ncid
ent
Sea
son
and
mon
th
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
of in
cide
nt
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
..2,
074
2,20
12,
392
2,40
22,
394
2,50
32,
483
2,25
82,
143
1,97
0
Unk
now
n....
......
......
......
..0
00
00
00
00
0
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
2,07
42,
201
2,39
22,
402
2,39
42,
503
2,48
32,
258
2,14
31,
970
Spr
ing.
......
......
.…...
.....
464
528
582
566
616
580
609
528
558
513
M
arch
......
..…...
......
..12
615
918
919
120
419
518
017
120
317
7
Apr
il....
......
…...
......
..16
217
618
815
419
919
122
017
216
616
4
May
......
....…
......
......
176
193
205
221
213
194
209
185
189
172
Sum
mer
......
.....…
......
..59
758
162
365
264
868
968
365
653
354
0
June
......
...…
......
......
205
165
183
197
190
199
220
206
189
152
Ju
ly...
......
…...
......
....
185
208
230
233
228
253
240
228
150
210
A
ugus
t....…
......
......
..20
720
821
022
223
023
722
322
219
417
8
F
all..
......
...…
......
......
...49
761
363
860
158
062
961
252
853
245
2
Sep
tem
ber.
......
......
..17
322
125
320
921
118
320
417
220
014
7
Oct
ober
......
......
......
..17
421
318
121
318
723
320
918
917
015
2
Nov
embe
r....
......
......
150
179
204
179
182
213
199
167
162
153
Win
ter.
......
......
......
......
516
479
549
583
550
605
579
546
520
465
D
ecem
ber…
......
......
.21
016
817
521
019
321
020
018
616
016
5
Janu
ary.
......
......
......
.17
517
121
418
919
721
720
421
017
617
3
Feb
ruar
y....
......
......
..13
114
016
018
416
017
817
515
018
412
7P
erce
nt b
ased
on
tota
l kno
wn
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
Spr
ing.
......
......
.…...
.....
22.4
24.0
24.3
23.6
25.7
23.2
24.5
23.4
26.0
26.0
M
arch
......
..…...
......
..6.
17.
27.
98.
08.
57.
87.
27.
69.
59.
0
Apr
il....
......
…...
......
..7.
88.
07.
96.
48.
37.
68.
97.
67.
78.
3
May
......
....…
......
......
8.5
8.8
8.6
9.2
8.9
7.8
8.4
8.2
8.8
8.7
Sum
mer
......
.....…
......
..28
.826
.426
.027
.127
.127
.527
.529
.124
.927
.4
June
......
...…
......
......
9.9
7.5
7.7
8.2
7.9
8.0
8.9
9.1
8.8
7.7
Ju
ly...
......
…...
......
....
8.9
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.5
10.1
9.7
10.1
7.0
10.7
A
ugus
t....…
......
......
..10
.09.
58.
89.
29.
69.
59.
09.
89.
19.
0
F
all..
......
...…
......
......
...24
.027
.926
.725
.024
.225
.124
.623
.424
.822
.9
Sep
tem
ber.
......
......
..8.
310
.010
.68.
78.
87.
38.
27.
69.
37.
5
Oct
ober
......
......
......
..8.
49.
77.
68.
97.
89.
38.
48.
47.
97.
7
Nov
embe
r....
......
......
7.2
8.1
8.5
7.5
7.6
8.5
8.0
7.4
7.6
7.8
Win
ter.
......
......
......
......
24.9
21.8
23.0
24.3
23.0
24.2
23.3
24.2
24.3
23.6
D
ecem
ber…
......
......
.10
.17.
67.
38.
78.
18.
48.
18.
27.
58.
4
Janu
ary.
......
......
......
.8.
47.
88.
97.
98.
28.
78.
29.
38.
28.
8
Feb
ruar
y....
......
......
..6.
36.
46.
77.
76.
77.
17.
06.
68.
66.
4N
ote:
Per
cent
ages
may
not
add
to s
ubto
tals
or
100.
0 be
caus
e of
rou
ndin
g.
62
Tab
le 1
6H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9G
ende
r an
d R
ace/
Eth
nic
Gro
up o
f Vic
tim b
y D
ay o
f Inc
iden
t
Day
of in
cide
nt
T
otal
Gen
der
Rac
e/et
hnic
gro
up
Mal
eF
emal
eW
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erU
nkno
wn
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own…
......
U
nkno
wn.
......
......
......
......
......
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
......
.
W
eekd
ay...
..…...
......
......
....
M
onda
y....
.…...
......
......
...
Tue
sday
....…
......
......
......
W
edne
sday
…...
......
......
..
Thu
rsda
y...…
......
......
......
F
riday
.....…
......
......
......
...
Wee
kend
..…...
......
......
......
.
Sat
urda
y....
.…...
......
......
..
Sun
day.
......
…...
......
......
..
1,97
0 0
1,97
01,
256
259
255
229
247
266
714
364
350
1,61
935
10
0
1,61
935
11,
016
240
210
4921
441
183
4619
552
214
52
603
111
310
5429
357
392
913
534
120
110
00
00
392
913
534
120
1126
555
935
273
760
109
7514
157
104
7618
052
110
5611
048
108
7115
548
128
7415
1
127
354
182
474
6317
696
254
6417
886
220
Per
cent
bas
ed o
n to
tal k
now
n
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
......
.
W
eekd
ay...
..…...
......
......
....
M
onda
y....
.…...
......
......
...
Tue
sday
....…
......
......
......
W
edne
sday
…...
......
......
..
Thu
rsda
y...…
......
......
......
F
riday
.....…
......
......
......
...
Wee
kend
..…...
......
......
......
.
Sat
urda
y....
.…...
......
......
..
Sun
day.
......
…...
......
......
..
100.
063
.813
.112
.911
.612
.513
.5
36.2
18.5
17.8
100.
010
0.0
62.8
68.4
13.0
14.0
13.2
11.7
11.3
13.1
12.0
14.8
13.2
14.8
37.2
31.6
19.1
15.4
18.1
16.2
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
067
.661
.265
.960
.8-
15.3
11.9
14.0
11.7
-14
.511
.414
.215
.0-
13.3
12.0
10.5
9.2
-12
.211
.813
.312
.5-
12.2
14.0
13.9
12.5
-
32.4
38.8
34.1
39.2
-16
.119
.318
.020
.8-
16.3
19.5
16.1
18.3
-1
Ave
rage
dai
ly n
umbe
r of
inci
dent
s
W
eekd
ay...
...…
......
......
......
Wee
kend
......
…...
......
......
...4.
86.
93.
90.
95.
81.
11.
02.
11.
30.
30.
01.
23.
41.
80.
50.
0N
otes
: Per
cent
ages
may
not
add
to s
ubto
tals
or
100.
0 be
caus
e of
rou
ndin
g.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at p
erce
nt d
istr
ibut
ions
are
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
Ave
rage
dai
ly n
umbe
r of
inci
dent
s m
ay n
ot a
dd to
tota
ls b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
1 The
re w
ere
365
days
in 2
009;
261
wee
kday
s an
d 10
4 w
eeke
nd d
ays.
The
ave
rage
dai
ly n
umbe
r of
inci
dent
s fo
r w
eekd
ays
was
c
alcu
late
d by
div
idin
g w
eekd
ay to
tals
by
261.
The
ave
rage
dai
ly n
umbe
r of
inci
dent
s fo
r w
eeke
nds
was
cal
cula
ted
by d
ivid
ing
w
eeke
nd to
tals
by
104.
63
Tab
le 1
7H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9A
ge o
f Vic
tim b
y D
ay o
f Inc
iden
t
Day
of in
cide
nt
Tot
al
Und
er
18
18
-29
30-3
940
an
d ov
er
Unk
now
n
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own…
......
U
nkno
wn.
......
......
......
......
.....
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
......
Wee
kday
.....…
......
......
......
M
onda
y....
.…...
......
......
..
Tue
sday
....…
......
......
.....
W
edne
sday
…...
......
......
.
Thu
rsda
y...…
......
......
.....
F
riday
.....…
......
......
......
..
W
eeke
nd..…
......
......
......
...
Sat
urda
y....
.…...
......
......
.
Sun
day.
......
…...
......
......
.
1,97
0 01,
970
1,25
625
925
522
924
726
671
436
435
0
242 0
242
163 28 36 30 29 40 79 47 32
838 0
838
504
114 99 96 95 100
334
174
160
353 0
353
210 42 42 32 38 56 143 66 77
528 0
528
374 74 78 71 82 69 154 75 79
9 0 9 5 1 0 0 3 1 4 2 2P
erce
nt b
ased
on
tota
l kno
wn
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
......
Wee
kday
.....…
......
......
......
M
onda
y....
.…...
......
......
..
Tue
sday
....…
......
......
.....
W
edne
sday
…...
......
......
.
Thu
rsda
y...…
......
......
.....
F
riday
.....…
......
......
......
..
W
eeke
nd..…
......
......
......
...
Sat
urda
y....
.…...
......
......
.
Sun
day.
......
…...
......
......
.
100.
063
.813
.112
.911
.612
.513
.536
.218
.517
.8
100.
067
.411
.614
.912
.412
.016
.532
.619
.413
.2
100.
060
.113
.611
.811
.511
.311
.939
.920
.819
.1
100.
059
.511
.911
.9 9.1
10.8
15.9
40.5
18.7
21.8
100.
070
.814
.014
.813
.415
.513
.129
.214
.215
.0
100.
0 - - - - - - - - -1
Ave
rage
dai
ly n
umbe
r of
inci
dent
s
W
eekd
ay...
...…
......
......
.....
Wee
kend
......
…...
......
......
..4.
86.
90.
60.
81.
93.
20.
81.
41.
41.
50.
00.
0
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
per
cent
dis
trib
utio
ns a
re n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
A
vera
ge d
aily
num
ber
of in
cide
nts
may
not
add
to to
tals
bec
ause
of r
ound
ing.
1 T
here
wer
e 36
5 da
ys in
200
9; 2
61 w
eekd
ays
and
104
wee
kend
day
s. T
he a
vera
ge d
aily
num
ber
of in
cide
nts
for
w
eekd
ays
was
cal
cula
ted
by d
ivid
ing
wee
kday
tota
ls b
y 26
1. T
he a
vera
ge d
aily
num
ber
of in
cide
nts
for
wee
kend
s
was
cal
cula
ted
by d
ivid
ing
wee
kend
tota
ls b
y 10
4.
64
Tab
le 1
8H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y Lo
catio
n of
Hom
icid
e20
0020
0120
0220
0320
04Lo
catio
nof
hom
icid
eN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
......
......
.…2,
074
2,20
12,
392
2,40
22,
394
U
nkno
wn.
.....…
......
.....…
......
.....
40
20
13
T
otal
kno
wn.
.…...
......
......
......
....
2,07
010
0.0
2,20
110
0.0
2,39
010
0.0
2,40
210
0.0
2,38
110
0.0
Vic
tim's
, sha
red
resi
denc
e....
.61
229
.657
326
.065
527
.462
325
.963
026
.5
Vic
tim's
res
iden
ce...
......
.....…
439
21.2
417
18.9
465
19.5
425
17.7
479
20.1
S
hare
d re
side
nce.
......
......
.…17
38.
415
67.
119
07.
919
88.
215
16.
3
S
tree
t, si
dew
alk…
......
......
......
779
37.6
845
38.4
970
40.6
909
37.8
1,04
643
.9
All
othe
r....
......
.…...
......
.....…
..67
932
.878
335
.676
532
.087
036
.270
529
.6
Hot
el, m
otel
..…...
......
......
....
231.
128
1.3
261.
126
1.1
200.
8
Oth
er r
esid
ence
......
......
..….
162
7.8
173
7.9
147
6.2
173
7.2
146
6.1
Li
quor
sto
re...
......
....…
......
...4
0.2
70.
34
0.2
60.
29
0.4
B
ar..…
.....…
....…
......
......
.....
371.
844
2.0
401.
738
1.6
351.
5
Oth
er b
usin
ess.
….…
......
.....
763.
761
2.8
612.
675
3.1
472.
0
P
arki
ng lo
t.....
......
......
...…
...72
3.5
753.
487
3.6
984.
174
3.1
V
ehic
le...
......
......
.....…
......
...15
67.
519
68.
922
89.
527
411
.424
010
.1
Fie
ld, p
ark.
…...
.…...
......
......
120
5.8
167
7.6
134
5.6
147
6.1
102
4.3
S
choo
l ....
.…...
..…...
......
......
20.
13
0.1
10.
03
0.1
40.
2
Oth
er...
.....…
...…
......
......
.....
271.
329
1.3
371.
530
1.2
281.
2
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Per
cent
cha
nge
Loca
tion
2000
-20
08-
of h
omic
ide
(con
t.)N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt20
0920
09T
otal
incl
udin
g un
know
n....
......
....…
2,50
32,
483
2,25
82,
143
1,97
0
Unk
now
n....
..…...
......
..…...
......
..25
1958
6991
T
otal
kno
wn.
.…...
......
......
......
....
2,47
810
0.0
2,46
410
0.0
2,20
010
0.0
2,07
410
0.0
1,87
910
0.0
-9.2
-9.4
Vic
tim's
, sha
red
resi
denc
e....
.56
722
.954
822
.248
522
.051
724
.947
525
.3-2
2.4
-8.1
V
ictim
's r
esid
ence
......
......
..…41
416
.739
716
.142
419
.343
721
.140
821
.7-7
.1-6
.6
Sha
red
resi
denc
e....
......
....…
153
6.2
151
6.1
612.
880
3.9
673.
6-6
1.3
-16.
3
S
tree
t, si
dew
alk…
......
......
......
1,11
645
.01,
097
44.5
980
44.5
764
36.8
665
35.4
-14.
6-1
3.0
All
othe
r....
......
.…...
......
.....…
..79
532
.181
933
.273
533
.479
338
.273
939
.38.
8-6
.8
Hot
el, m
otel
..…...
......
......
....
230.
922
0.9
150.
716
0.8
261.
4-
-
Oth
er r
esid
ence
......
......
..….
138
5.6
167
6.8
165
7.5
247
11.9
228
12.1
40.7
-7.7
Li
quor
sto
re...
......
....…
......
...6
0.2
50.
28
0.4
100.
511
0.6
--
B
ar..…
.....…
....…
......
......
.....
341.
441
1.7
361.
626
1.3
351.
9-
-
Oth
er b
usin
ess.
….…
......
.....
702.
861
2.5
482.
243
2.1
492.
6-3
5.5
-
P
arki
ng lo
t.....
......
......
...…
...97
3.9
104
4.2
108
4.9
121
5.8
123
6.5
70.8
1.7
V
ehic
le...
......
......
.....…
......
...28
211
.429
612
.017
68.
018
48.
913
57.
2-1
3.5
-26.
6
Fie
ld, p
ark.
…...
.…...
......
......
943.
892
3.7
125
5.7
102
4.9
101
5.4
-15.
8-1
.0
Sch
ool .
....…
.....…
......
......
...4
0.2
30.
12
0.1
30.
12
0.1
--
O
ther
......
..…...
…...
......
......
..47
1.9
281.
152
2.4
412.
029
1.5
--
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at a
per
cent
cha
nge
is n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
65
Tab
le 1
9H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9G
ende
r an
d R
ace/
Eth
nic
Gro
up o
f Vic
tim b
y Lo
catio
n of
Hom
icid
e
Loca
tion
of h
omic
ide
Tot
al
Gen
der
R
ace/
ethn
ic g
roup
Mal
eF
emal
eW
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erU
nkno
wn
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
......
......
.…
Unk
now
n....
..…...
......
..…...
......
...
Tot
al k
now
n..…
......
......
......
......
..
V
ictim
's, s
hare
d re
side
nce.
......
V
ictim
's r
esid
ence
......
......
..…
Sha
red
resi
denc
e....
......
....…
Str
eet,
side
wal
k…...
......
......
.....
All
othe
r....
......
.…...
......
.....…
...
Hot
el, m
otel
..…...
......
......
....…
O
ther
res
iden
ce...
......
.....…
..
Liqu
or s
tore
......
......
.…...
......
.
Bar
..…...
..…...
.…...
......
......
...
Oth
er b
usin
ess.
….…
......
......
P
arki
ng lo
t.....
......
......
...…
.....
V
ehic
le...
......
......
.....…
......
....
F
ield
, par
k.…
....…
......
......
....
S
choo
l ....
.…...
..…...
......
......
.
Oth
er...
.....…
...…
......
......
......
1,97
0 911,
879
475
408 67 665
739 26 228 11 35 49 123
135
101 2 29
1,61
935
173
181,
546
333
293
182
262
146
3136
610
5564
396
1610
196
3211
033
244
511
013
117
1888
131
127
2
392
913
534
120
1117
4920
41
375
864
514
116
1017
218
778
380
143
166
6930
029
219
80
7632
524
022
212
735
219
656
86
119
00
5410
653
150
15
23
04
169
60
1020
411
419
5144
90
977
436
019
5126
23
01
01
05
146
31
Per
cent
bas
ed o
n to
tal k
now
n
Tot
al k
now
n..…
......
......
......
......
..
V
ictim
's, s
hare
d re
side
nce.
......
V
ictim
's r
esid
ence
......
......
..…
Sha
red
resi
denc
e....
......
....…
Str
eet,
side
wal
k…...
......
......
.....
All
othe
r....
......
.…...
......
.....…
...
Hot
el, m
otel
..…...
......
......
....…
O
ther
res
iden
ce...
......
.....…
..
Liqu
or s
tore
......
......
.…...
......
.
Bar
..…...
..…...
.…...
......
......
...
Oth
er b
usin
ess.
….…
......
......
P
arki
ng lo
t.....
......
......
...…
.....
V
ehic
le...
......
......
.....…
......
....
F
ield
, par
k.…
....…
......
......
....
S
choo
l ....
.…...
..…...
......
......
.
Oth
er...
.....…
...…
......
......
......
100.
025
.321
.7 3.6
35.4
39.3 1.4
12.1 0.6
1.9
2.6
6.5
7.2
5.4
0.1
1.5
100.
010
0.0
19.0
54.7
16.9
43.8
2.0
10.8
39.5
16.5
41.6
28.8
1.0
3.0
12.7
9.6
0.7
0.0
2.1
0.6
2.8
1.5
7.1
3.9
7.6
5.4
5.7
3.9
0.1
0.3
1.7
0.6
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
045
.921
.615
.232
.8-
38.1
19.2
13.4
25.9
-7.
72.
41.
86.
9-
20.3
37.6
46.7
19.0
-33
.940
.738
.148
.3-
1.6
1.3
1.8
0.0
-14
.412
.310
.312
.9-
0.3
0.6
0.4
2.6
-1.
11.
91.
85.
2-
2.7
2.3
0.8
9.5
-5.
15.
98.
67.
8-
2.4
8.9
8.4
5.2
-5.
15.
95.
11.
7-
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.9
-1.
31.
61.
22.
6-
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
per
cent
dis
trib
utio
ns a
re n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
66
Tab
le 2
0H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9A
ge o
f Vic
tim b
y Lo
catio
n of
Hom
icid
e
Loca
tion
of
hom
icid
e
Tot
al
Und
er
18
18
-29
30-3
940
and
over
Unk
now
n
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
......
......
.…
Unk
now
n....
..…...
......
..…...
......
...
T
otal
kno
wn.
.…...
......
......
......
.....
Vic
tim's
, sha
red
resi
denc
e....
..
Vic
tim's
res
iden
ce...
......
.....…
S
hare
d re
side
nce.
......
......
.…
S
tree
t, si
dew
alk…
......
......
......
.
All
othe
r....
......
.…...
......
.....…
...
Hot
el, m
otel
..…...
......
......
....…
O
ther
res
iden
ce...
......
.....…
..
Liqu
or s
tore
......
......
.…...
......
B
ar..…
.....…
....…
......
......
.....
O
ther
bus
ines
s.…
.…...
......
...
P
arki
ng lo
t.....
......
......
...…
....
V
ehic
le...
......
......
.....…
......
...
Fie
ld, p
ark.
…...
.…...
......
......
.
Sch
ool .
....…
.....…
......
......
....
O
ther
......
..…...
…...
......
......
...
1,97
0 91
1,87
947
540
8 67 665
739 26 228 11 35 49 123
135
101 2 29
242 9
233 87 61 26 81 65 2 33 0 1 0 9 8 10 1 1
838 40 798 99 88 11 359
340 8
109 3 13 19 54 80 44 1 9
353 20 333 77 67 10 106
150 7 37 3 14 9 33 27 15 0 5
528 20 508
212
192 20 118
178 9 49 5 7 21 27 20 27 0 13
9 2 7 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1P
erce
nt b
ased
on
tota
l kno
wn
T
otal
kno
wn.
.…...
......
......
......
.....
Vic
tim's
, sha
red
resi
denc
e....
..
Vic
tim's
res
iden
ce...
......
.....…
S
hare
d re
side
nce.
......
......
.…
S
tree
t, si
dew
alk…
......
......
......
.
All
othe
r....
......
.…...
......
.....…
...
Hot
el, m
otel
..…...
......
......
....…
O
ther
res
iden
ce...
......
.....…
..
Liqu
or s
tore
......
......
.…...
......
B
ar..…
.....…
....…
......
......
.....
O
ther
bus
ines
s.…
.…...
......
...
P
arki
ng lo
t.....
......
......
...…
....
V
ehic
le...
......
......
.....…
......
...
Fie
ld, p
ark.
…...
.…...
......
......
.
Sch
ool .
....…
.....…
......
......
....
O
ther
......
..…...
…...
......
......
...
100.
025
.321
.7 3.6
35.4
39.3 1.4
12.1 0.6
1.9
2.6
6.5
7.2
5.4
0.1
1.5
100.
037
.326
.211
.234
.8
27.9 0.9
14.2 0.0
0.4
0.0
3.9
3.4
4.3
0.4
0.4
100.
012
.411
.0 1.4
45.0
42.6 1.0
13.7 0.4
1.6
2.4
6.8
10.0 5.5
0.1
1.1
100.
023
.120
.1 3.0
31.8
45.0 2.1
11.1 0.9
4.2
2.7
9.9
8.1
4.5
0.0
1.5
100.
041
.737
.8 3.9
23.2
35.0 1.8
9.6
1.0
1.4
4.1
5.3
3.9
5.3
0.0
2.6
100.
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
per
cent
dis
trib
utio
ns a
re n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
67
Tab
le 2
1H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0 -
2009
By
Typ
e of
Wea
pon
Use
d20
0020
0120
0220
0320
04T
ype
of
wea
pon
used
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
….…
......
...2,
074
2,20
12,
392
2,40
22,
394
U
nkno
wn.
......
..…...
…...
......
......
.....
2828
2823
12
Tot
al k
now
n....
….…
......
......
......
.....
2,04
610
0.0
2,17
310
0.0
2,36
410
0.0
2,37
910
0.0
2,38
210
0.0
Fire
arm
......
..….…
......
......
......
.....
1,44
070
.41,
568
72.2
1,73
573
.41,
733
72.8
1,73
072
.6
Han
dgun
...…
.…...
......
......
......
..1,
242
60.7
1,34
161
.71,
555
65.8
1,56
665
.81,
462
61.4
A
ll ot
her
firea
rms…
.…...
......
....
198
9.7
227
10.4
180
7.6
167
7.0
268
11.3
Rifl
e....
......
.…..…
......
......
......
663.
267
3.1
803.
462
2.6
733.
1
S
hotg
un...
...…
..…...
......
......
..55
2.7
683.
160
2.5
532.
269
2.9
Oth
er fi
rear
m…
..…..…
…...
...1
0.0
20.
12
0.1
30.
13
0.1
Fire
arm
- u
nkno
wn
type
......
.76
3.7
904.
138
1.6
492.
112
35.
2
N
onfir
earm
......
......
.....…
......
......
.60
629
.660
527
.862
926
.664
627
.265
227
.41
K
nife
......
......
.…...
......
......
......
..28
513
.929
813
.727
411
.625
810
.828
211
.82
B
lunt
obj
ect
.....…
......
......
......
..98
4.8
954.
411
64.
911
64.
910
44.
43
P
erso
nal w
eapo
n...
.…...
......
...11
15.
410
34.
711
85.
013
85.
814
86.
2
All
othe
r....
......
..…..…
......
......
..11
25.
510
95.
012
15.
113
45.
611
85.
04
Rop
e...
......
...…
......
......
......
..40
2.0
371.
741
1.7
582.
449
2.1
Dru
gs...
......
....…
..…...
......
.....
30.
14
0.2
50.
22
0.1
50.
25
Oth
er...
......
....…
......
......
......
.69
3.4
683.
175
3.2
743.
164
2.7
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Per
cent
cha
nge
Typ
e
2000
-20
08-
of w
eapo
n us
ed (
cont
.)N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt20
0920
09T
otal
incl
udin
g un
know
n.…
.…...
......
2,50
32,
483
2,25
82,
143
1,97
0
Unk
now
n....
.....…
...…
......
......
......
..22
2534
3342
T
otal
kno
wn.
...…
.…...
......
......
......
..2,
481
100.
02,
458
100.
02,
224
100.
02,
110
100.
01,
928
100.
0-5
.8-8
.6
F
irear
m...
.....…
.…...
......
......
......
..1,
845
74.4
1,82
174
.11,
610
72.4
1,48
770
.51,
359
70.5
-5.6
-8.6
H
andg
un...
….…
......
......
......
.....
1,54
762
.41,
619
65.9
1,37
361
.71,
153
54.6
1,01
852
.8-1
8.0
-11.
7
All
othe
r fir
earm
s….…
......
......
.29
812
.020
28.
223
710
.733
415
.834
117
.772
.22.
1
R
ifle.
......
....…
..…...
......
......
...87
3.5
743.
052
2.3
482.
345
2.3
-31.
8-6
.3
S
hotg
un...
...…
..…...
......
......
..75
3.0
702.
873
3.3
643.
049
2.5
-10.
9-2
3.4
Oth
er fi
rear
m…
..…..…
…...
...0
0.0
00.
03
0.1
80.
43
0.2
--
Fire
arm
- u
nkno
wn
type
......
.13
65.
558
2.4
109
4.9
214
10.1
244
12.7
221.
114
.0
N
onfir
earm
......
......
.....…
......
......
.63
625
.663
725
.961
427
.662
329
.556
929
.5-6
.1-8
.71
K
nife
......
......
.…...
......
......
......
..29
111
.731
412
.829
813
.429
714
.129
115
.12.
1-2
.02
B
lunt
obj
ect
.....…
......
......
......
..78
3.1
773.
194
4.2
111
5.3
102
5.3
4.1
-8.1
3
Per
sona
l wea
pon
....…
......
......
138
5.6
130
5.3
118
5.3
120
5.7
107
5.5
-3.6
-10.
8
All
othe
r....
......
..…..…
......
......
..12
95.
211
64.
710
44.
795
4.5
693.
6-3
8.4
-27.
44
Rop
e...
......
...…
......
......
......
..30
1.2
331.
329
1.3
211.
023
1.2
--
Dru
gs...
......
....…
..…...
......
.....
20.
15
0.2
10.
02
0.1
10.
1-
-5
Oth
er...
......
....…
......
......
......
.97
3.9
783.
274
3.3
723.
445
2.3
-34.
8-3
7.5
Not
es:
Per
cent
ages
may
not
add
to s
ubto
tals
or
100.
0 be
caus
e of
rou
ndin
g.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
a p
erce
nt c
hang
e is
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
1 A
ny in
stru
men
t use
d to
cut
or
stab
.
2 Clu
b, e
tc.
3 H
ands
, fee
t, et
c.
4 Any
inst
rum
ent u
sed
to h
ang
or s
tran
gle.
5 P
oiso
n, a
rson
, pel
let g
un, d
row
ning
, etc
.
68
Tab
le 2
2H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9G
ende
r an
d R
ace/
Eth
nic
Gro
up o
f Vic
tim b
y T
ype
of W
eapo
n U
sed
Typ
e
of w
eapo
n us
ed
T
otal
Gen
der
Rac
e/et
hnic
gro
up
M
ale
Fem
ale
Whi
teH
ispa
nic
Bla
ckO
ther
Unk
now
n
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
….…
......
...
Unk
now
n....
.....…
...…
......
......
......
..
Tot
al k
now
n....
….…
......
......
......
....
Fire
arm
......
..….…
......
......
......
....
H
andg
un...
….…
......
......
......
....
A
ll ot
her
firea
rms…
.…...
......
....
Rifl
e....
......
.…..…
......
......
......
Sho
tgun
......
…..…
......
......
....
Oth
er fi
rear
m…
..…..…
…...
..
F
irear
m -
unk
now
n ty
pe...
....
Non
firea
rm...
......
......
..…...
......
....
1
Kni
fe...
......
....…
......
......
......
....
2
Blu
nt o
bjec
t...
..…...
......
......
....
3
Per
sona
l wea
pon
....…
......
.....
A
ll ot
her.
......
.....…
..…...
......
.....
4
R
ope
......
......
…...
......
......
....
Dru
gs...
......
....…
..…...
......
....
5
O
ther
......
......
.…...
......
......
...
1,97
0 421,
928
1,35
91,
018
341 45 49 3
244
569
291
102
107 69 23 1 45
1,61
935
131
111,
588
340
1,19
916
090
311
529
645
396
427
30
212
3238
918
021
774
7428
7235
2643
320
01
2322
392
913
534
120
1115
204
30
377
893
530
117
1118
464
844
178
811
648
135
361
768
167
8817
16
2612
10
1519
132
01
20
00
4612
063
141
193
245
8939
394
136
4120
038
4216
60
3939
218
022
2811
53
117
23
01
00
00
1021
92
3P
erce
nt b
ased
on
tota
l kno
wn
T
otal
kno
wn.
...…
.…...
......
......
......
.
F
irear
m...
.....…
.…...
......
......
......
.
Han
dgun
...…
.…...
......
......
......
.
All
othe
r fir
earm
s….…
......
......
.
R
ifle.
......
....…
..…...
......
......
...
S
hotg
un...
...…
..…...
......
......
.
O
ther
fire
arm
…..…
..……
.....
Fire
arm
- u
nkno
wn
type
......
.
Non
firea
rm...
......
......
..…...
......
....
1
Kni
fe...
......
....…
......
......
......
....
2
Blu
nt o
bjec
t...
..…...
......
......
....
3
Per
sona
l wea
pon
....…
......
.....
A
ll ot
her.
......
.....…
..…...
......
.....
4
R
ope
......
......
…...
......
......
....
Dru
gs...
......
....…
..…...
......
....
5
O
ther
......
......
.…...
......
......
...
100.
070
.552
.817
.7 2.3
2.5
0.2
12.7
29.5
15.1 5.3
5.5
3.6
1.2
0.1
2.3
100.
010
0.0
75.5
47.1
56.9
33.8
18.6
13.2
2.5
1.8
2.6
2.1
0.2
0.0
13.4
9.4
24.5
52.9
13.7
21.8
4.7
8.2
4.5
10.3
1.6
12.6
0.2
5.9
0.0
0.3
1.4
6.5
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
048
.872
.683
.266
.7-
30.8
53.9
66.6
52.1
-18
.018
.716
.614
.5-
1.6
2.9
2.3
0.9
-4.
02.
12.
51.
7-
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
-12
.213
.411
.912
.0-
51.2
27.4
16.8
33.3
-24
.915
.27.
717
.1-
10.1
4.7
3.0
5.1
-10
.34.
44.
06.
8-
5.8
3.1
2.1
4.3
-2.
90.
80.
42.
6-
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
-2.
72.
41.
71.
7-
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at p
erce
nt d
istr
ibut
ions
are
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
1 A
ny in
stru
men
t use
d to
cut
or
stab
.
2 Clu
b, e
tc.
3 H
ands
, fee
t, et
c.
4 Any
inst
rum
ent u
sed
to h
ang
or s
tran
gle.
5 P
oiso
n, a
rson
, pel
let g
un, d
row
ning
, etc
.
69
Tab
le 2
3H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9A
ge o
f Vic
tim b
y T
ype
of W
eapo
n U
sed
Typ
e
of w
eapo
n us
ed
Tot
al
Und
er
18
18
-29
30-3
940
and
over
Unk
now
n
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
….…
......
.....
U
nkno
wn.
......
..…...
…...
......
......
......
T
otal
kno
wn.
...…
.…...
......
......
......
...
F
irear
m...
.....…
.…...
......
......
......
...
Han
dgun
...…
.…...
......
......
......
...
All
othe
r fir
earm
s….…
......
......
..
R
ifle.
......
....…
..…...
......
......
....
Sho
tgun
......
…..…
......
......
......
Oth
er fi
rear
m…
..…..…
…...
....
Fire
arm
- u
nkno
wn
type
......
...
Non
firea
rm...
......
......
..…...
......
.....
1
Kni
fe...
......
....…
......
......
......
......
2
Blu
nt o
bjec
t...
..…...
......
......
......
3
Per
sona
l wea
pon
....…
......
......
.
All
othe
r....
......
..…..…
......
......
...4
Rop
e...
......
...…
......
......
......
...
D
rugs
......
......
.…..…
......
......
...5
Oth
er...
......
....…
......
......
......
..
1,97
0 421,
928
1,35
91,
018
341 45 49 3
244
569
291
102
107 69 23 1 45
242 1
241
142
105 37 4 4 0 29 99 26 15 43 15 2 0 13
838 16 822
691
518
173 26 22 2
123
131 85 19 9 18 8 0 10
353 7
346
258
207 51 5 6 0 40 88 60 8 6 14 6 0 8
528 18 510
262
182 80 10 17 1 52 248
120 60 49 19 7 1 11
9 0 9 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 3P
erce
nt b
ased
on
tota
l kno
wn
T
otal
kno
wn.
...…
.…...
......
......
......
...
F
irear
m...
.....…
.…...
......
......
......
...
Han
dgun
...…
.…...
......
......
......
...
All
othe
r fir
earm
s….…
......
......
..
R
ifle.
......
....…
..…...
......
......
....
Sho
tgun
......
…..…
......
......
......
Oth
er fi
rear
m…
..…..…
…...
....
Fire
arm
- u
nkno
wn
type
......
...
Non
firea
rm...
......
......
..…...
......
.....
1
Kni
fe...
......
....…
......
......
......
......
2
Blu
nt o
bjec
t...
..…...
......
......
......
3
Per
sona
l wea
pon
....…
......
......
.
All
othe
r....
......
..…..…
......
......
...4
Rop
e...
......
...…
......
......
......
...
D
rugs
......
......
.…..…
......
......
...5
Oth
er...
......
....…
......
......
......
..
100.
070
.552
.817
.7 2.3
2.5
0.2
12.7
29.5
15.1 5.3
5.5
3.6
1.2
0.1
2.3
100.
058
.943
.615
.4 1.7
1.7
0.0
12.0
41.1
10.8 6.2
17.8 6.2
0.8
0.0
5.4
100.
084
.163
.021
.0 3.2
2.7
0.2
15.0
15.9
10.3 2.3
1.1
2.2
1.0
0.0
1.2
100.
074
.659
.814
.7 1.4
1.7
0.0
11.6
25.4
17.3 2.3
1.7
4.0
1.7
0.0
2.3
100.
051
.435
.715
.7 2.0
3.3
0.2
10.2
48.6
23.5
11.8 9.6
3.7
1.4
0.2
2.2
100.
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at p
erce
nt d
istr
ibut
ions
are
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
1 A
ny in
stru
men
t use
d to
cut
or
stab
.
2 Clu
b, e
tc.
3 H
ands
, fee
t, et
c.
4A
ny in
stru
men
t use
d to
han
g or
str
angl
e.
5 Poi
son,
ars
on, p
elle
t gun
, dro
wni
ng, e
tc.
70
Tab
le 2
4H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
0-20
09B
y C
ontr
ibut
ing
Circ
umst
ance
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Con
trib
utin
g
ci
rcum
stan
ceN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own…
......
2,07
42,
201
2,39
22,
402
2,39
4
Unk
now
n....
......
......
......
......
..31
431
737
041
032
0
Tot
al k
now
n....
......
......
......
....
1,76
010
0.0
1,88
410
0.0
2,02
210
0.0
1,99
210
0.0
2,07
410
0.0
Rap
e, r
obbe
ry, b
urgl
ary…
.20
611
.714
97.
917
98.
916
18.
114
57.
0
Rap
e....
......
.....…
......
......
80.
512
0.6
80.
47
0.4
60.
3
Rob
bery
......
......
......
......
.18
610
.613
37.
116
38.
113
76.
912
86.
2
Bur
glar
y…...
......
......
......
.12
0.7
40.
28
0.4
170.
911
0.5
Arg
umen
t.....
.…...
......
......
..72
641
.379
342
.177
938
.583
642
.088
642
.7
Dom
estic
vio
lenc
e....
.....
147
8.4
176
9.3
181
9.0
187
9.4
163
7.9
A
ll ot
her
argu
men
t.....
....
579
32.9
617
32.7
598
29.6
649
32.6
723
34.9
Gan
g-, d
rug-
rela
ted…
......
.58
133
.072
638
.581
640
.477
238
.878
637
.9
Gan
g-re
late
d....
......
......
..50
628
.864
734
.373
036
.166
933
.669
833
.7
Dru
g-re
late
d....
......
......
...75
4.3
794.
286
4.3
103
5.2
884.
2
A
ll ot
her.
......
......
…...
......
...24
714
.021
611
.524
812
.322
311
.225
712
.4
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Per
cent
cha
nge
Con
trib
utin
g
20
00-
2008
-ci
rcum
stan
ce (
cont
.)N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt20
0920
09T
otal
incl
udin
g un
know
n…...
...2,
503
2,48
32,
258
2,14
31,
970
U
nkno
wn.
......
......
......
......
.....
526
568
825
751
550
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
......
.1,
977
100.
01,
915
100.
01,
433
100.
01,
392
100.
01,
420
100.
0-1
9.3
2.0
Rap
e, r
obbe
ry, b
urgl
ary…
.15
17.
614
17.
410
77.
597
7.0
119
8.4
-42.
222
.7
Rap
e....
......
.....…
......
......
70.
46
0.3
30.
20
0.0
10.
1-
-
Rob
bery
......
......
......
......
.13
56.
813
26.
994
6.6
926.
611
07.
7-4
0.9
19.6
B
urgl
ary…
......
......
......
....
90.
53
0.2
100.
75
0.4
80.
6-
-
A
rgum
ent..
....…
......
......
.....
791
40.0
741
38.7
599
41.8
531
38.1
497
35.0
-31.
5-6
.4
Dom
estic
vio
lenc
e....
.....
160
8.1
141
7.4
119
8.3
113
8.1
130
9.2
-11.
615
.0
All
othe
r ar
gum
ent..
......
.63
131
.960
031
.348
033
.541
830
.036
725
.8-3
6.6
-12.
2
G
ang-
, dru
g-re
late
d…...
....
756
38.2
748
39.1
510
35.6
511
36.7
590
41.5
1.5
15.5
G
ang-
rela
ted.
......
......
.....
653
33.0
645
33.7
469
32.7
469
33.7
554
39.0
9.5
18.1
D
rug-
rela
ted.
......
......
......
103
5.2
103
5.4
412.
942
3.0
362.
5-5
2.0
-
A
ll ot
her.
......
......
…...
......
...27
914
.128
514
.921
715
.125
318
.221
415
.1-1
3.4
-15.
4
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
a p
erce
nt c
hang
e is
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
71
Tab
le 2
5H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9G
ende
r an
d R
ace/
Eth
nic
Gro
up o
f Vic
tim b
y C
ontr
ibut
ing
Circ
umst
ance
Con
trib
utin
g
ci
rcum
stan
ce
Gen
der
R
ace/
ethn
ic g
roup
Tot
alM
ale
Fem
ale
Whi
teH
ispa
nic
Bla
ckO
ther
Unk
now
n
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own.
…...
......
U
nkno
wn.
......
......
......
.....…
......
T
otal
kno
wn.
.....…
......
......
..…...
Rap
e, r
obbe
ry, b
urgl
ary.
......
..
Rap
e....
...…
......
......
.....…
...
Rob
bery
, bur
glar
y....
......
.....
Rob
bery
.....…
......
......
....…
Bur
glar
y....
.…...
......
......
.…
Arg
umen
t.....
...…
......
......
....…
D
omes
tic v
iole
nce.
......
......
…
All
othe
r ar
gum
ent..
......
.....…
Gan
g-, d
rug-
rela
ted.
......
......
.…
Gan
g-re
late
d....
......
....…
.....
D
rug-
rela
ted.
......
......
......
....
All
othe
r…...
...…
......
......
......
…
1,97
055
0
1,42
011
9 111
811
0 8
497
130
367
590
554 36 214
1,61
935
147
080
1,14
927
110
613
01
106
1210
010
62
334
163
1811
231
651
563
2753
123
324
146
68
392
913
534
120
1111
923
516
130
5
273
678
373
906
3740
2516
10
00
10
3740
2515
133
3924
131
41
12
0
160
193
9942
354
4519
120
106
148
8030
330
350
192
180
2433
318
314
06
179
40
4695
5714
2P
erce
nt b
ased
on
tota
l kno
wn
T
otal
kno
wn.
.....…
......
......
.....…
Rap
e, r
obbe
ry, b
urgl
ary.
......
..
Rap
e....
...…
......
......
......
...…
R
obbe
ry, b
urgl
ary.
......
......
.…
R
obbe
ry...
..…...
......
......
.…
B
urgl
ary.
....…
......
......
.…..
Arg
umen
t.....
...…
......
......
.…..
D
omes
tic v
iole
nce.
......
......
…
All
othe
r ar
gum
ent..
......
.....…
Gan
g-, d
rug-
rela
ted.
......
......
…
Gan
g-re
late
d....
......
......
.....…
D
rug-
rela
ted.
......
......
......
.…
A
ll ot
her…
......
…...
......
.....…
..
100.
08.
40.
18.
37.
70.
6
35.0 9.2
25.8
41.5
39.0 2.5
15.1
100.
010
0.0
9.2
4.8
0.0
0.4
9.2
4.4
8.7
3.7
0.5
0.7
29.1
60.1
1.6
41.3
27.5
18.8
49.0
10.0
46.2
8.5
2.8
1.5
12.7
25.1
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
013
.65.
96.
717
.8-
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
-13
.65.
96.
716
.7-
12.1
5.8
6.4
14.4
-1.
50.
10.
32.
2-
58.6
28.5
26.5
46.7
-19
.86.
65.
113
.3-
38.8
21.8
21.4
33.3
-11
.051
.651
.520
.0-
8.8
49.1
49.1
15.6
-2.
22.
52.
44.
4-
16.8
14.0
15.3
15.6
-N
otes
: Per
cent
ages
may
not
add
to s
ubto
tals
or
100.
0 be
caus
e of
rou
ndin
g.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
per
cent
dis
trib
utio
ns a
re n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
base
num
ber
is le
ss th
an 5
0.
72
Tab
le 2
6H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9A
ge o
f Vic
tim b
y C
ontr
ibut
ing
Circ
umst
ance
Con
trib
utin
g
ci
rcum
stan
ce
T
otal
Und
er 5
5-17
18-2
930
-39
40-4
950
-59
60-6
970
and
over
Unk
now
n
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own…
......
..
Unk
now
n.…
......
......
......
......
...
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
......
..
R
ape,
rob
bery
, bur
glar
y....
..
Rap
e…...
......
…...
......
......
R
obbe
ry...
......
......
......
......
B
urgl
ary.
......
......
......
......
..
Arg
umen
t..…
......
......
......
....
D
omes
tic v
iole
nce…
......
..
All
othe
r ar
gum
ent..
......
...
G
ang-
, dru
g-re
late
d..…
......
.
Gan
g-re
late
d....
......
......
...
Dru
g-re
late
d....
......
......
....
Chi
ld a
buse
...…
......
......
......
All
othe
r…...
......
....…
......
....
1,97
055
0
1,42
011
9 111
0 8
497
130
367
590
554 36 76 138
69 2 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 60 6
173 35 138 3 0 2 1 14 1 13 89 87 2 16 16
838
218
620 34 0 32 2
191 42 149
342
327 15 0 53
353
109
244 19 1 17 1 95 30 65 110
102 8 0 20
259 80 179 23 0 23 0 96 26 70 36 28 8 0 24
145 50 95 20 0 19 1 57 17 40 9 6 3 0 9
79 29 50 12 0 11 1 30 9 21 2 2 0 0 6
45 20 25 8 0 6 2 14 5 9 0 0 0 0 3
9 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1P
erce
nt b
ased
on
tota
l kno
wn
T
otal
kno
wn.
......
......
......
......
..
R
ape,
rob
bery
, bur
glar
y....
..
Rap
e…...
......
…...
......
......
R
obbe
ry...
......
......
......
......
B
urgl
ary.
......
......
......
......
..
Arg
umen
t..…
......
......
......
....
D
omes
tic v
iole
nce…
......
..
All
othe
r ar
gum
ent..
......
...
G
ang-
, dru
g-re
late
d..…
......
.
Gan
g-re
late
d....
......
......
...
Dru
g-re
late
d....
......
......
....
Chi
ld a
buse
...…
......
......
......
All
othe
r…...
......
....…
......
....
100.
08.
40.
17.
70.
6
35.0 9.2
25.8
41.5
39.0 2.5
5.4
9.7
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
1.5
0.0
89.6 9.0
100.
02.
20.
01.
40.
7
10.1 0.7
9.4
64.5
63.0 1.4
11.6
11.6
100.
05.
50.
05.
20.
3
30.8 6.8
24.0
55.2
52.7 2.4
0.0
8.5
100.
07.
80.
47.
00.
4
38.9
12.3
26.6
45.1
41.8 3.3
0.0
8.2
100.
012
.8 0.0
12.8 0.0
53.6
14.5
39.1
20.1
15.6 4.5
0.0
13.4
100.
021
.1 0.0
20.0 1.1
60.0
17.9
42.1 9.5
6.3
3.2
0.0
9.5
100.
024
.0 0.0
22.0 2.0
60.0
18.0
42.0 4.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
100.
0 - - - - - - - - - - - -
100.
0 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Not
es: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
sub
tota
ls o
r 10
0.0
beca
use
of r
ound
ing.
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
dat
a ar
e no
t app
licab
le o
r th
at p
erce
nt d
istr
ibut
ions
are
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
73
Tab
le 2
7H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
, 200
9C
ontr
ibut
ing
Circ
umst
ance
by
Rel
atio
nshi
p of
Vic
tim to
Offe
nder
Rel
atio
nshi
pof
vic
tim to
offe
nder
Tot
alR
ape
Rob
bery
,bu
rgla
ry1
Arg
umen
tG
ang-
,dr
ug-
rela
ted
Chi
ldab
use
All
othe
rU
nkno
wn
Num
ber
Tot
al in
clud
ing
unkn
own…
.....…
U
nkno
wn.
.…...
......
.....…
......
…
Tot
al k
now
n.…
......
....…
......
…2
Frie
nd, a
cqua
inta
nce
…..…
3
S
pous
e...
...…
......
......
.....…
Par
ent,
child
4 …...
……
.....…
All
othe
r re
lativ
es…
.…...
..…
S
tran
ger.
......
....…
......
......
…
1,97
087
81,
092
572 64 96 34 326
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
118 43 75 28 0 0 1 46
497 55 442
268 61 21 22 70
590
328
262
166 0 0 0 96
76 6 70 15 0 53 2 0
138 57 81 41 1 6 2 31
550
389
161 54 2 16 7 82
Per
cent
bas
ed o
n to
tal k
now
n
Tot
al k
now
n.…
......
....…
......
…2
Frie
nd, a
cqua
inta
nce
…..…
3
S
pous
e...
...…
......
......
.....…
Par
ent,
child
4 …...
….…
....…
All
othe
r re
lativ
es…
.…...
..…
S
tran
ger.
......
....…
......
......
…
100.
052
.4 5.9
8.8
3.1
29.9
100.
0 - - - - -
100.
037
.3 0.0
0.0
1.3
61.3
100.
060
.613
.8 4.8
5.0
15.8
100.
063
.4 0.0
0.0
0.0
36.6
100.
021
.4 0.0
75.7 2.9
0.0
100.
050
.6 1.2
7.4
2.5
38.3
100.
033
.5 1.2
9.9
4.3
50.9
Not
es:
Per
cent
ages
may
not
add
to 1
00.0
bec
ause
of r
ound
ing.
D
ash
indi
cate
s th
at p
erce
nt d
istr
ibut
ions
are
not
cal
cula
ted
whe
n th
e ba
se n
umbe
r is
less
than
50.
1 In
clud
es d
omes
tic v
iole
nce.
2 In
clud
es e
x-hu
sban
d, e
x-w
ife, e
mpl
oyer
, em
ploy
ee, g
ang
mem
ber,
etc
.
3 Incl
udes
"co
mm
on-la
w"
mar
riage
par
tner
.
4 Incl
udes
ste
pmot
her,
ste
pfat
her,
ste
pdau
ghte
r, a
nd s
teps
on.
74
Table 28HOMICIDE CRIMES CLEARED, 2000-2009
Number Reported, Number Cleared, and Clearance Rate
Number of Number of Clearance Year(s) homicides homicides 1ratereported cleared
2009…………… 1,970 1,248 63.42008…………… 2,143 1,227 57.32007…………… 2,258 1,208 53.52006…………… 2,483 1,292 52.02005..............… 2,503 1,249 49.9
2004..............… 2,394 1,314 54.92003..............… 2,402 1,323 55.12002..............… 2,392 1,362 56.92001..............… 2,201 1,091 49.62000..............… 2,074 1,082 52.21 A clearance rate is the percentage of crimes (homicides) reported that have been cleared. It is calculated by dividing the number of homicides cleared by the number of homicides reported. The result is multiplied by 100. See Appendix III - Glossary for a detailed explanation of clearances.
75
Table 29FELONY ARRESTS FOR
SELECTED VIOLENT OFFENSES, 2000-2009Number, Rate per 100,000 Population at Risk, and Percent Change
Forcible Year(s) Total Homicide Robbery Assault
rapeNumber
2009.................... 122,078 1,804 2,050 21,610 96,6142008.................... 126,252 1,850 2,103 22,488 99,8112007.................... 127,633 2,017 2,164 21,614 101,8382006.................... 124,624 1,967 2,122 20,376 100,1592005.................... 123,967 1,956 2,098 18,218 101,695
2004.................... 125,263 1,978 2,237 17,864 103,1842003.................... 129,522 1,839 2,456 17,501 107,7262002.................... 130,295 1,864 2,549 16,957 108,9252001.................... 134,398 1,754 2,730 17,167 112,7472000.................... 130,259 1,627 2,702 17,122 108,808
Percent change in number2008 to 2009....... -3.3 -2.5 -2.5 -3.9 -3.22007 to 2008....... -1.1 -8.3 -2.8 4.0 -2.02006 to 2007....... 2.4 2.5 2.0 6.1 1.72005 to 2006....... 0.5 0.6 1.1 11.8 -1.52004 to 2005....... -1.0 -1.1 -6.2 2.0 -1.4
2003 to 2004....... -3.3 7.6 -8.9 2.1 -4.22002 to 2003....... -0.6 -1.3 -3.6 3.2 -1.12001 to 2002....... -3.1 6.3 -6.6 -1.2 -3.42000 to 2001....... 3.2 7.8 1.0 0.3 3.6
2000 to 2009....... -6.3 10.9 -24.1 26.2 -11.2Rate per 100,000 population at risk1
2009.................... 403.6 6.0 6.8 71.4 319.42008.................... 422.1 6.2 7.0 75.2 333.72007.................... 431.8 6.8 7.3 73.1 344.52006.................... 426.3 6.7 7.3 69.7 342.62005.................... 430.3 6.8 7.3 63.2 353.0
2004.................... 441.7 7.0 7.9 63.0 363.92003.................... 465.6 6.6 8.8 62.9 387.32002.................... 477.2 6.8 9.3 62.1 399.02001.................... 502.5 6.6 10.2 64.2 421.62000.................... 497.1 6.2 10.3 65.3 415.2
Percent change in rate2008 to 2009....... -4.4 -3.2 -2.9 -5.1 -4.32007 to 2008....... -2.2 -8.8 -4.1 2.9 -3.12006 to 2007....... 1.3 1.5 0.0 4.9 0.62005 to 2006....... -0.9 -1.5 0.0 10.3 -2.92004 to 2005....... -2.6 -2.9 -7.6 0.3 -3.0
2003 to 2004....... -5.1 6.1 -10.2 0.2 -6.02002 to 2003....... -2.4 -2.9 -5.4 1.3 -2.92001 to 2002....... -5.0 3.0 -8.8 -3.3 -5.42000 to 2001....... 1.1 6.5 -1.0 -1.7 1.5
2000 to 2009....... -18.8 -3.2 -34.0 9.3 -23.1
Notes: Rates may not add to total because of rounding. Rates are based on annual population estimates provided by the Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. 1 Rates are based on the total population at risk (10-69 years of age).
76
Tab
le 3
0H
OM
ICID
E A
RR
ES
TS
, 200
0-20
09B
y G
ende
r of
Arr
este
e
Yea
r(s)
Tot
alM
ale
Fem
ale
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
2009
......
......
..20
08...
......
.....
2007
......
......
..20
06...
......
.....
2005
......
......
..
2004
......
......
..20
03...
......
.....
2002
......
......
..20
01...
......
.....
2000
......
......
..
1,80
410
0.0
1,85
010
0.0
2,01
710
0.0
1,96
710
0.0
1,95
610
0.0
1,97
810
0.0
1,83
910
0.0
1,86
410
0.0
1,75
410
0.0
1,62
710
0.0
1,62
089
.81,
652
89.3
1,80
289
.31,
732
88.1
1,73
788
.8
1,74
588
.21,
627
88.5
1,65
588
.81,
537
87.6
1,42
687
.6
184
10.2
198
10.7
215
10.7
235
11.9
219
11.2
233
11.8
212
11.5
209
11.2
217
12.4
201
12.4
Tab
le 3
1H
OM
ICID
E A
RR
ES
TS
, 200
0-20
09B
y R
ace/
Eth
nic
Gro
up o
f Arr
este
e
Yea
r(s)
Tot
alW
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
nt
2009
......
......
..20
08...
......
.....
2007
......
......
..20
06...
......
.....
2005
......
......
..
2004
......
......
..20
03...
......
.....
2002
......
......
..20
01...
......
.....
2000
......
......
..
1,80
410
0.0
1,85
010
0.0
2,01
710
0.0
1,96
710
0.0
1,95
610
0.0
1,97
810
0.0
1,83
910
0.0
1,86
410
0.0
1,75
410
0.0
1,62
710
0.0
343
19.0
346
18.7
373
18.5
351
17.8
386
19.7
409
20.7
424
23.1
349
18.7
400
22.8
374
23.0
907
50.3
944
51.0
1,02
250
.791
046
.394
648
.4
932
47.1
812
44.2
897
48.1
832
47.4
698
42.9
430
23.8
436
23.6
495
24.5
539
27.4
487
24.9
476
24.1
456
24.8
455
24.4
406
23.1
397
24.4
124
6.9
124
6.7
127
6.3
167
8.5
137
7.0
161
8.1
147
8.0
163
8.7
116
6.6
158
9.7
Not
e: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
77
Tab
le 3
2H
OM
ICID
E A
RR
ES
TS
, 200
0-20
09B
y A
ge o
f Arr
este
e
Yea
r(s)
Tot
alU
nder
18
18-2
930
-39
40 a
nd o
ver
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
2009
......
......
..20
08...
......
.....
2007
......
......
..20
06...
......
.....
2005
......
......
..
2004
......
......
..20
03...
......
.....
2002
......
......
..20
01...
......
.....
2000
......
......
..
1,80
410
0.0
1,85
010
0.0
2,01
710
0.0
1,96
710
0.0
1,95
610
0.0
1,97
810
0.0
1,83
910
0.0
1,86
410
0.0
1,75
410
0.0
1,62
710
0.0
182
10.1
221
11.9
235
11.7
241
12.3
185
9.5
185
9.4
167
9.1
215
11.5
194
11.1
160
9.8
1,03
257
.21,
098
59.4
1,19
359
.11,
154
58.7
1,20
761
.7
1,14
357
.81,
077
58.6
1,09
758
.91,
011
57.6
913
56.1
299
16.6
273
14.8
293
14.5
267
13.6
281
14.4
313
15.8
326
17.7
293
15.7
291
16.6
299
18.4
291
16.1
258
13.9
296
14.7
305
15.5
283
14.5
337
17.0
269
14.6
259
13.9
258
14.7
255
15.7
Not
e: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
Tab
le 3
3H
OM
ICID
E A
RR
ES
TS, 2
009
Rac
e/E
thni
c G
roup
of A
rres
tee
by G
ende
r an
d A
ge o
f Arr
este
e
Gen
der
and
age
of
arr
este
e
Tot
al
W
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rP
erce
ntT
otal
Tot
al...
......
......
......
.1,
804
100.
034
310
0.0
907
100.
043
010
0.0
124
100.
0G
ende
r
Mal
e....
......
......
...
Fem
ale.
...…
......
..1,
620
89.8
184
10.2
283
82.5
6017
.583
391
.874
8.2
391
90.9
399.
111
391
.111
8.9
Age
U
nder
18.
......
.....
18
-29.
....…
......
...
30-3
9....
.…...
......
40
and
ove
r....
....
182
10.1
1,03
257
.229
916
.629
116
.1
154.
412
436
.269
20.1
135
39.4
110
12.1
586
64.6
140
15.4
717.
8
4710
.926
160
.766
15.3
5613
.0
108.
161
49.2
2419
.429
23.4
Not
e: P
erce
ntag
es m
ay n
ot a
dd to
100
.0 b
ecau
se o
f rou
ndin
g.
78
Race/Ethnic
Table 34HOMICIDE ARRESTS, 2009
Group of Arrestee by Gender and Age of Arrestee
Gender and age of arrestee
Total White Hispanic Black Other Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total........................... 1,804 100.0 343 100.0 907 100.0 430 100.0 124 100.0 Under 18..…........... 182 10.1 15 4.4 110 12.1 47 10.9 10 8.1 18-19...................... 290 16.1 18 5.2 188 20.7 74 17.2 10 8.1 20-24...................... 478 26.5 54 15.7 273 30.1 120 27.9 31 25.0 25-29...................... 264 14.6 52 15.2 125 13.8 67 15.6 20 16.1 30-34...................... 178 9.9 34 9.9 93 10.3 40 9.3 11 8.9
35-39...................... 121 6.7 35 10.2 47 5.2 26 6.0 13 10.5 40-44...................... 88 4.9 30 8.7 30 3.3 20 4.7 8 6.5 45-49...................... 73 4.0 37 10.8 14 1.5 15 3.5 7 5.6 50-54...................... 59 3.3 32 9.3 14 1.5 9 2.1 4 3.2 55 and over…......... 71 3.9 36 10.5 13 1.4 12 2.8 10 8.1
Male........…............ 1,620 100.0 283 100.0 833 100.0 391 100.0 113 100.0 Under 18..…........ 171 10.6 12 4.2 106 12.7 43 11.0 10 8.8 18-19................... 267 16.5 15 5.3 172 20.6 70 17.9 10 8.8 20-24................... 441 27.2 46 16.3 258 31.0 109 27.9 28 24.8 25-29................... 236 14.6 43 15.2 115 13.8 59 15.1 19 16.8 30-34................... 152 9.4 26 9.2 82 9.8 36 9.2 8 7.1
35-39................... 108 6.7 31 11.0 39 4.7 25 6.4 13 11.5 40-44................... 68 4.2 19 6.7 23 2.8 18 4.6 8 7.1 45-49................... 64 4.0 32 11.3 12 1.4 14 3.6 6 5.3 50-54................... 51 3.1 28 9.9 14 1.7 6 1.5 3 2.7 55 and over…...... 62 3.8 31 11.0 12 1.4 11 2.8 8 7.1
Female..….............. 184 100.0 60 100.0 74 100.0 39 100.0 11 100.0 Under 18.............. 11 6.0 3 5.0 4 5.4 4 - 0 - 18-19................... 23 12.5 3 5.0 16 21.6 4 - 0 - 20-24................... 37 20.1 8 13.3 15 20.3 11 - 3 - 25-29................... 28 15.2 9 15.0 10 13.5 8 - 1 - 30-34................... 26 14.1 8 13.3 11 14.9 4 - 3 -
35-39................... 13 7.1 4 6.7 8 10.8 1 - 0 - 40-44................... 20 10.9 11 18.3 7 9.5 2 - 0 - 45-49................... 9 4.9 5 8.3 2 2.7 1 - 1 - 50-54................... 8 4.3 4 6.7 0 0.0 3 - 1 - 55 and over…...... 9 4.9 5 8.3 1 1.4 1 - 2 -Notes:
Percentages may not add to 100.0 because Dash indicates that percent distributions are
of rounding. not calculated when the base number is less than 50.
79
PERSONS SENTENCE
Table 35UNDER CALIFORNIA OF DEATH, 1978-2009
Year(s)Initial
sentences
Total persons under
sentence of 2death1,
2009.…….............. 29 6812008.…….............. 21 6652007.…….............. 17 6592006.…….............. 17 649
2005.…….............. 22 6412004.…….............. 12 6322003.…….............. 22 6262002.…….............. 17 6102001..……............. 25 600
2000..……............. 33 5831999..……............. 42 5501998..……............. 32 5131997...……............ 40 4921996..……............. 40 460
1995...……............ 38 4271994.…….............. 21 3931993.…….............. 34 3761992....……........... 40 3481991.......……........ 26 308
1990...……............ 33 2811989....……........... 33 2491988……............... 34 2251987……............... 25 2031986……............... 21 179
1985.…….............. 16 1601984.…….............. 27 1611983.…….............. 35 1431982.…….............. 39 1131981.…….............. 39 80
1980……............... 23 421979……............... 20 251978……............... 7 7Source: Offender-Based Transaction Statistics, California Department of Justice (initial sentences) and California Appellate Project (total persons under sentence of death). 1 Total persons under sentence of death on December 31 of each year. Persons with multiple California death sentences are counted once. 2 The increase in the total number of persons under sentence of death from year-to-year will not equal the number of initial sentences reported each year. This is because, in addition to initial sentences, persons may be resentenced to death, no longer under sentence of death because of execution or death by other causes, removed pending retrial, resentenced to a penalty less than death, or freed.
80
Tab
le 3
6P
ER
SO
NS
SE
NT
EN
CE
D T
O D
EA
TH
, 200
9S
ente
ncin
g C
ount
y by
Gen
der,
Rac
e/E
thni
c G
roup
, and
Age
Sen
tenc
ing
co
unty
Tot
alG
ende
rR
ace/
ethn
ic g
roup
Age
at a
rres
t
Mal
eF
emal
eW
hite
His
pani
cB
lack
Oth
erU
nder
40
and
20-2
425
-29
30-3
435
-39
20ov
erT
otal
......
......
......
......
..
C
ontr
a C
osta
......
....
Lo
s A
ngel
es...
......
..
Mad
era.
......
......
......
O
rang
e....
......
......
...
Riv
ersi
de...
......
......
.
San
Die
go...
......
.....
T
ular
e....
......
......
.....
29 2 13 1 7 4 1 1
281
20
130
10
70
31
10
10
99
110
20
00
22
90
01
00
24
10
31
00
00
10
01
00
16
72
76
00
00
11
06
30
22
00
01
00
00
21
22
00
10
21
00
10
00
10
00
00
Not
e: T
his
tabl
e do
es n
ot in
clud
e pe
rson
s re
sent
ence
d to
dea
th a
fter
thei
r de
ath
sent
ence
was
rev
erse
d on
app
eal.
81
Tab
le 3
7H
OM
ICID
E C
RIM
ES
AN
D P
EA
CE
OF
FIC
ER
S K
ILL
ED
IN T
HE
LIN
E O
F D
UT
Y, 2
000-
2009
Num
ber
and
Rat
e pe
r 10
0,00
0 R
espe
ctiv
e P
opul
atio
n
Yea
r(s)
Cal
iforn
iapo
pula
tion
Hom
icid
esS
wor
n la
wen
forc
emen
t pe
rson
nel2
Pea
ce o
ffic
ers
kille
din
the
line
of d
uty
1N
umbe
rR
ate
Num
ber
Rat
e
2009
......
......
..20
08...
......
.....
2007
......
......
..20
06...
......
.....
2005
......
......
..
2004
......
......
..20
03...
......
.....
2002
......
......
..20
01...
......
.....
2000
......
......
..
38,4
87,8
8938
,148
,493
37,7
71,4
3137
,444
,385
37,0
04,6
61
36,5
90,8
1435
,934
,000
35,3
01,0
0034
,758
,000
34,4
80,0
00
1,97
02,
143
2,25
82,
483
2,50
3
2,39
42,
402
2,39
22,
201
2,07
4
5.1
5.6
6.0
6.6
6.8
6.5
6.7
6.8
6.3
6.0
80,4
2981
,402
78,7
2475
,625
74,4
45
73,9
5175
,336
75,6
1272
,119
69,0
29
4 3 4 5 5 4 6 4 6 2
5.0
3.7
5.1
6.6
6.7
5.4
8.0
5.3
8.3
2.9
Not
e: H
omic
ide
rate
s ar
e ba
sed
on a
nnua
l pop
ulat
ion
estim
ates
pro
vide
d by
the
Dem
ogra
phic
Res
earc
h
U
nit,
Cal
iforn
ia D
epar
tmen
t of F
inan
ce.
1 In
clud
es p
eace
offi
cers
felo
niou
sly
kille
d in
the
line
of d
uty.
2 P
erso
nnel
in th
e D
epar
tmen
t of J
ustic
e an
d ot
her
stat
e re
gula
tory
age
ncie
s ar
e no
t inc
lude
d.
Tab
le 3
8P
EA
CE
OF
FIC
ER
S K
ILL
ED
IN T
HE
LIN
E O
F D
UT
Y, 2
009
By
Con
trib
utin
g C
ircum
stan
ce
Con
trib
utin
g ci
rcum
stan
ceN
umbe
rP
erce
nt
Tot
al...
......
.....…
......
......
......
..…...
.....…
......
.....
A
ttem
pted
arr
est..
......
......
…...
......
......
.....…
.
Tra
ffic
purs
uit/s
top.
......
......
.…...
......
......
.....…
4 2 2
100.
0
- -N
ote:
Das
h in
dica
tes
that
per
cent
dis
trib
utio
ns a
re n
ot c
alcu
late
d w
hen
the
bas
e nu
mbe
r is
less
than
50.
82
Table 39JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDES BY PEACE OFFICERS
OR PRIVATE CITIZENS, 2009By Gender, Race/Ethnic Group, and Age of Deceased
Gender,race/ethnic group,
andage of deceased
TotalPeace officer
justifiablePrivate citizen
justifiable
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
TotalTotal.................... 146 100.0 113 100.0 33 100.0
Gender Male.................... Female.................
1397
95.24.8
1067
93.86.2
330
100.00.0
Race/ethnic group White.................... Hispanic................ Black.................... Other.................... Unknown..............
33643991
22.643.826.76.20.7
29492591
25.743.422.18.00.9
4151400
12.145.542.40.00.0
Age Under 18............... 18-29.................... 18-19................. 20-24................. 25-29................. 30-39.................... 30-34................. 35-39................. 40 and over.......... 40-44................. 45-49................. 50-54................. 55 and over....... Unknown..............
7729
3627321418357
15850
4.849.36.2
24.718.521.99.6
12.324.04.8
10.35.53.40.0
5526
2719261313306
13740
4.446.05.3
23.916.823.011.511.526.55.3
11.56.23.50.0
220398615512110
6.160.69.1
27.324.218.23.0
15.215.23.06.13.03.00.0
Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
83
Table 40JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDES BY PEACE OFFICERS
OR PRIVATE CITIZENS, 2009By Location of Justifiable Homicide
of Location
justifiable homicide
Number
Percent
TotalTotal....................…….................... 146
Peace officer justifiable
Total.....….........…….................... 113 100.0 Felon's residence…….............. 18 15.9 Other residence....................… 10 8.8 Street, sidewalk....................… 49 43.4 Commercial establishment....... 8 7.1 Hotel, motel....................…… 0 0.0 Liquor store....................…… 1 0.9 Bar....................…….............. 0 0.0 Other business....................… 7 6.2 All other....................……......... 28 24.8 Parking lot....................…….. 11 9.7 Vehicle....................……........ 3 2.7 Field, park....................…….. 1 0.9 Other....................…….......... 13 11.5
Citizen justifiable
Total....................……................. 33 100.0 Citizen's, shared residence...... 8 24.2 Citizen's residence................ 6 18.2 Shared residence.................. 2 6.1 Other residence....................… 10 30.3 Felon's residence.................. 6 18.2 Other residence....................… 4 12.1 Street, sidewalk....................… 3 9.1 Commercial establishment....... 5 15.2 Hotel, motel....................…… 0 0.0 Liquor store....................…… 0 0.0 Bar....................…….............. 2 6.1 Other business....................… 3 9.1 All other....................……......... 7 21.2 Parking lot....................…….. 4 12.1 Vehicle....................……........ 0 0.0 Field, park....................…….. 2 6.1 Other....................…….......... 1 3.0
Note: Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding.
84
Table 41JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDES BY PEACE OFFICERS
OR PRIVATE CITIZENS, 2009By Contributing Circumstance
Contributing circumstance Number Percent
TotalTotal.....................……….................................... 146
Peace officer justifiable
Total...................…………..........…...…........... 113 100.0 Felon attacked peace officer..…..…............. Felon killed during commission of crime....... Felon resisted arrest.....................................
57394
50.434.53.5
All other........................................................ 13 11.5 Felon attacked another peace officer........ Felon attacked citizen................................
52
4.41.8
Felon attempted flight................................ Details not provided...................................
60
5.30.0
Citizen justifiable
Total...........................…….......……................. 33 100.0 Felon attacked citizen................................... 18 54.5 Felon killed during commission of crime....... Details not provided......................................
141
42.43.0
Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Table 42JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDES BY PEACE OFFICERS
OR PRIVATE CITIZENS, 2009By Type of Weapon Used
Type of
Total
Peace officer justifiable
Citizenjustifiable
weapon used Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total.........…….................……... 146 100.0 113 100.0 33 100.0 Firearm..…...................…….... 132 90.4 112 99.1 20 60.6 Handgun..................……...... 104 71.2 87 77.0 17 51.5 Rifle.......…....….........…….... 5 3.4 5 4.4 0 0.0 Shotgun.................……........ 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Other firearm.........……........ 1 0.7 1 0.9 0 0.0 Firearm - unknown type........ 22 15.1 19 16.8 3 9.1 Nonfirearm..….............……..... 14 9.6 1 0.9 13 39.4
1 Knife .........……........…........ 8 5.5 0 0.0 8 24.22 Personal weapon .........…… 3 2.1 0 0.0 3 9.1
3 Other .........……........…....... 3 2.1 1 0.9 2 6.1Note: Percentages may not add to subtotals 1 Any instrument used to cut or stab. 2 Hands, feet, etc. 3 Poison, arson, pellet gun, drowning, etc.
or
to 100.0 because of rounding.
85
POPULATION Table 43ESTIMATES, 1960-2009
Year(s)Total
population Population at risk
Total1 2Adult 3Juvenile
2009................ 38,487,889 30,250,590 25,712,251 4,538,3392008................ 38,148,493 29,910,167 25,302,852 4,607,3152007................ 37,771,431 29,558,540 24,902,100 4,656,4402006................ 37,444,385 29,236,911 24,731,088 4,505,823
2005................ 37,004,661 28,809,579 24,316,140 4,493,4392004................ 36,590,814 28,357,204 23,906,564 4,450,6402003................ 35,934,000 27,815,344 23,295,523 4,519,8212002................ 35,301,000 27,302,433 22,927,383 4,375,0502001................ 34,758,000 26,745,137 22,555,739 4,189,398
2000................ 34,480,000 26,203,950 22,198,297 4,005,6531999................ 34,036,000 25,711,892 21,855,190 3,856,7021998................ 33,494,000 25,263,064 21,498,170 3,764,8941997................ 32,957,000 25,760,375 21,934,916 3,825,4591996................ 32,383,000 25,554,242 21,825,735 3,728,507
1995................ 32,063,000 25,122,782 21,505,839 3,616,9431994................ 32,140,000 24,703,379 21,193,571 3,509,8081993................ 31,742,000 24,334,534 20,923,632 3,410,9021992................ 31,300,000 23,975,578 20,661,120 3,314,4581991................ 30,646,000 23,585,168 20,356,984 3,228,184
1990................ 29,557,836 23,178,961 20,027,633 3,151,3281989................ 28,771,207 22,524,392 19,451,763 3,072,6291988................ 28,060,746 21,969,953 18,885,349 3,084,6041987................ 27,388,477 21,483,563 18,378,758 3,104,8051986................ 26,741,621 21,009,362 17,903,122 3,106,240
1985................ 26,112,632 20,563,314 17,468,941 3,094,3731984................ 25,587,254 20,167,923 17,083,479 3,084,4441983................ 25,075,581 19,860,746 16,763,095 3,097,6511982................ 24,546,566 19,510,945 16,415,571 3,095,3741981................ 24,038,711 19,172,812 16,082,355 3,090,457
1980................ 23,668,145 18,824,197 15,778,999 3,045,1981979................ 23,255,000 18,371,691 15,323,376 3,048,3151978................ 22,839,000 18,012,901 14,916,032 3,096,8691977................ 22,350,000 17,619,453 14,470,680 3,148,7731976................ 21,935,000 17,269,884 14,080,872 3,189,012
1975................ 21,537,000 16,914,556 13,694,793 3,219,7631974................ 21,173,000 16,563,671 13,339,906 3,223,7651973................ 20,868,000 16,237,031 13,031,007 3,206,0241972................ 20,585,000 15,926,249 12,758,809 3,167,4401971................ 20,346,000 15,657,238 12,542,795 3,114,443
1970................ 20,039,000 15,378,312 12,339,580 3,038,7321969................ 19,856,000 14,697,200 11,657,600 3,039,6001968................ 19,554,000 14,379,400 11,403,700 2,975,7001967................ 19,478,000 14,065,700 11,159,800 2,905,9001966................ 19,132,000 13,696,700 10,872,500 2,824,200
1965................ 18,756,000 13,377,400 10,620,600 2,756,8001964................ 18,234,000 12,981,700 10,311,100 2,670,6001963................ 17,675,000 12,564,600 10,047,700 2,516,9001962................ 17,044,000 12,099,200 9,740,000 2,359,2001961................ 16,445,000 11,697,900 9,469,100 2,228,800
1960................ 15,860,000 11,314,900 9,203,300 2,111,600
Source: Population estimates were provided by the California Department of Finance. 1 Total population at risk, 10-69 years of age. 2 Adult population at risk, 18-69 years of age. 3 Juvenile population at risk, 10-17 years of age.
Demographic Research Unit,
86
Homicide in California
Appendices
89
A ppendix IData Characteristics and Known Limitations
HOMICIDE CRIMES
Homicide data are obtained from the Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR). The SHR is submitted monthly by local California law enforcement agencies as part of the national Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) system.
The number of reported homicide crimes represents known victims.
Per UCR definition, suicides, fetal deaths, traffic fatalities, accidental deaths, assaults to murder, and attempts to murder are not classified as criminal homicide and are not included in this report.
The findings of a court, coroner’s inquest, etc., do not affect classifying or scoring of the SHR homicide counts.
Detailed data regarding the criminal homicide category can only be as comprehensive as the input provided by the individual contributing agency.
Offender data (race/ethnicity, age, and gender) are based on law enforcement identification of the offender as a suspect. No follow-up is made to determine if a conviction was obtained.
Weapon – Reporting agencies report a complete description of the weapon and the ways in which the weapon was used. For example, if a bottle was used in the commission of a murder, the agency will state whether the person was killed by beating, cutting, or stabbing.
Relationship – The relationship reported is that of the victim to the offender. For example, if a wife is killed by her husband the reported relationship is wife.
Circumstances – Statements of circumstances must be based on information known to law enforcement, not decisions of a grand jury, coroner’s inquest, or other agency outside law enforcement. The reporting agency provides a brief statement as to the circumstances or precipitating events leading to the victim’s death. If the killing occurred in conjunction with the commission of another felony such as a robbery or rape, the agency identifies the specific offense involved.
ARRESTSMonthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR)
Arrest data from the MACR reporting system are designed to collect data on the number of persons arrested, not the number of charges lodged.
If a person is arrested for multiple offenses, MACR selects only the most serious offense, based on the severity of possible punishment.
The subjectivity of the classification and labeling process must be considered in the analysis of race/ethnic group data.
90
Homicide in California, 2009
Data Characteristics and Known Limitations (continued)
ADULT FELONY ARREST DISPOSITIONSOffender-Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS)
To provide the most valid data possible, the disposition section of this report has been removed. In 2001, Criminal Justice Statistics Center staff determined that a number of homicide arrests submitted to the DOJ’s Automated Criminal History System (from which adult felony arrest disposition data are extracted) between 2000 and 2001 should have been submitted as arrests for attempted homicide. As a result, more homicide arrests were counted during these years than occurred. This caused a lower percentage of homicide convictions and a higher percentage of assault convictions. (Both percentages were based on the number of adult felony arrests for homicide for which dispositions were received.) It should be noted that the DOJ has addressed this issue and that the exclusion of disposition data does not affect crime, arrest, death penalty, or other data included in this or past reports. When homicide disposition data are once again determined to be accurate, they will be included in this publication.
POPULATION
Since 2004, the population estimates used to calculate rates have been based on revisions of the 2000 Census. Prior to 2003, these population estimates were based on revisions of the 1990 Census. Readers are advised to exercise care in interpreting changes in percent and rate between decennial census samples. In addition, the “other” population category now includes the Department of Finance’s race/ethnic group of “multi-racial.”
91
A ppendix IIComputational Formulas
ARREST RATE – An arrest rate describes the number of arrests made by law enforcement agencies per 100,000 total population or per 100,000 population considered to be at risk for arrest (10–69 years of age). The at-risk population can be further distinguished by adults at risk (aged 18–69 years) and juveniles at risk (aged 10–17 years). Regardless of the population used, both rates are calculated in the same manner. An arrest rate is calculated by dividing the number of reported arrests by the respective population; the result is multiplied by 100,000. For example, in 2009 there were 1,804 homicide arrests. The total population was 38,487,889 and the total population at risk (10–69 years of age) was 30,250,950. This equals a homicide arrest rate of 4.7 per 100,000 total population and 6.0 per 100,000 total population at risk.
1,804 38,487,889
1,80430,250,590
= 0.000046872 x 100,000 = 4.7 per 100,000 total population
= 0.00005964 x 100,000 = 6.0 per 100,000 total population at risk
CLEARANCE RATE – A clearance rate is the percentage of crimes reported that have been cleared. A clearance rate is calculated by dividing the number of crimes cleared by the number of crimes reported; the result is multiplied by 100. For example, in 2009 there were 1,248 homicides cleared and 1,970 homicides reported. This equals a homicide clearance rate of 63.4 percent.
1,2481,970
= 0.633502538 x 100 = 63.4 percent
CRIME RATE – A crime rate describes the number of crimes reported to law enforcement agencies per 100,000 total population. A crime rate is calculated by dividing the number of reported crimes by the total population; the result is multiplied by 100,000. For example, in 2009 there were 1,970 homicides in California and the population was 38,487,889. This equals a homicide crime rate of 5.1 per 100,000 general population.
1,97038,487,889
= 0.0000511849 x 100,000 = 5.1 per 100,000 population
PERCENT CHANGE – A percent change describes a change in number or rate from one year to another. A percent change is calculated by subtracting base-year data from current-year data; the result is divided by base-year data and multiplied by 100. For example, in 2009 the homicide crime rate was 5.1. In 2000 the homicide crime rate was 6.0. The percent change in rate from 2000 to 2009 is a 15.0 percent decrease.
5.1 - 6.06.0
= -0.15 x 100 = -15.0 percent
Notes:Whenaseriesofratesarecalculatedusingdifferentpopulations,theratecalculatedforthetotalwillnotbeequaltothesumoftherates calculatedforeachsubtotal.Forexample,thetotalarrestrate(calculatedusingthetotalat-riskpopulation)willnotequalthesumofthe adultarrestrate(calculatedusingtheadultat-riskpopulation)andthejuvenilearrestrate(calculatedusingthejuvenileat-riskpopulation).
Calculatingratesforcountiesoflessthan100,000willgenerateaninflatedratewhencomparedtocountieswithpopulationsof100,000or more;therefore,ratesarenotcalculatedforcountieswithpopulationsoflessthan100,000.
92
A ppendix IIIGlossary
ADULT: a person 18 years of age or older.
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT: an unlawful attack or attempted attack by one person upon another for the purpose of inflicting severe or aggravated bodily injury. This type of assault usually is accompanied by the use of a weapon or by means likely to produce death or great bodily harm (UCR definition).
APPEAL: a petition initiated by a defendant for a rehearing in an appellate court regarding a previous sentence or motion.
ARREST: ". . . taking a person into custody, in a case and in the manner authorized by law. An arrest may be made by a peace officer or by a private person" (834 PC).
ARREST RATE: the number of arrests per 100,000 population or population at risk. See Appendix II – Computational Formulas for further explanation.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION (CDCR): the state agency that operates all state adult prisons and juvenile facilities, oversees a variety of community correctional facilities and other important correctional facility responsibilities, and supervises all adult and juvenile parolees during their reentry into society.
CLEARANCE: an offense is "cleared by arrest" or solved, for crime reporting purposes, when at least one person is arrested, charged with the commission of an offense, and turned over to a court for prosecution. Although no physical arrest is made, a clearance by arrest can be claimed when an offender is a person under 18 years of age and is cited to appear in juvenile court or before other juvenile authorities. An
offense can also be "cleared exceptionally" for crime reporting purposes when an investigation has definitely established the identity of an offender; there is enough information to support an arrest; and the exact location of an offender is known but, for some reason, law enforcement cannot take the offender into custody.
CLEARANCE RATE: the percentage of crimes reported that have been cleared.
CONVICTION: a judgment, based either on the verdict of a jury or a judicial officer or on the guilty plea of the defendant, that the defendant is guilty.
COURT: an agency of the judicial branch of government, authorized or established by statute or constitution, having one or more judicial officers on its staff. A court has the authority to decide upon controversies in law and disputed matters of fact brought before it. Because of court consolidation we no longer distinguish between lower court and superior court.
CRIME: ". . . an act committed or omitted in violation of a law forbidding or commanding it. . ." (15 PC).
CRIME RATE: the number of reported crimes per 100,000 general population. See Appendix II – Computational Formulas for further explanation.
FELON: one who has committed a felony.
FELONY: a crime that is punishable by death or by imprisonment in a state prison (17 & 18 PC).
93
Appendices
Glossary (continued)
FORCIBLE RAPE: the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. Assaults or attempts to commit rape by force or threat of force are included (UCR definition).
HOMICIDE: the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another. Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter are included (UCR definition).
JUVENILE: a person under the age of 18.
MISDEMEANOR: a crime punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for up to one year.
MONTHLY ARREST AND CITATION REGISTER (MACR): a reporting system used to collect information on adult and juvenile arrests and citations by police and sheriffs' departments. This register contains data on arrest offenses, arrestee characteristics (age, gender, and race/ethnic group), and law enforcement dispositions.
OFFENDER-BASED TRANSACTION STATISTICS (OBTS): a system designed to collect statistical information on the various processes within the criminal justice system that occur between the point of the felony arrest of an adult and the point of final disposition.
OFFENSE: the charged offense is the crime for which the defendant was arrested or filed on by the district attorney. The convicted offense is the offense the defendant was convicted of or pled guilty to in court.
PENAL CODE (PC): the California Penal Code contains statutes that define criminal offenses and specify corresponding punishments. Criminal justice system mandates and procedures are also included.
POPULATION AT RISK: that portion of the total population who, because of like characteristics to the specific study group, are considered "at risk." For example, if one were studying juvenile arrestees, all persons between 10 and 17 years of age would constitute the at-risk population.
RATE: a comparison of a number of events to a population.
ROBBERY: the taking or attempting to take anything of value from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or threat of force or violence and/or by creating fear in the victim (UCR definition).
SENTENCE: the penalty imposed by a court upon a convicted person.
UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING (UCR): a federal reporting system that compiles crime data based on information submitted by law enforcement agencies throughout the nation. In California, the Department of Justice administers and forwards these law enforcement data to the federal program.
VIOLENT CRIMES: crimes committed against people. This category includes homicide, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
94
Acknowledgments The DOJ is mandated by state law to submit an annual Homicide in California report. The department extends its appreciation to all the law enforcement agencies that provided complete and timely data. This report would not have been possible without their cooperation.
CJSC Publications
ANNUAL PUBLICATIONSAnti-Reproductive-RightsCrimesinCalifornia*CrimeinCalifornia*CrimeinCalifornia,AdvanceRelease*CriminalJusticeProfile–ASupplementto CrimeinCalifornia(statewideandindividual counties)*HateCrimeinCalifornia*HomicideinCalifornia*JuvenileJusticeinCalifornia*PreliminaryReport,Crime(January throughJune,andJanuarythrough December)*
FOCI AND FORUMSTheCaliforniaExperienceinAmerican JuvenileJustice:SomeHistorical Perspectives(December1988)ControllingPleaBargaininginCalifornia (September1985)CoordinatingJusticeinCalifornia:“There oughttobealawaboutit”(December 1988)CrimeControlandtheCriminalCareer (December1992)TheDevelopmentofCaliforniaDrunk DrivingLegislation(December1988)EmploymentandCrime(February1989)TheImpactofCalifornia’s“PriorFelony Conviction”Law(September1987)TheOriginsandDevelopmentofPenalties forDrunkDriversinCalifornia(August 1988)APolicyRoleforFocusGroups: CommunityCorrections(September 1991)ThePrevalenceandIncidenceofArrests AmongAdultMalesinCalifornia(August 1988)TheSocialStructureofStreetDrug Dealing(December1988)
OUTLOOKSAdultFelonyArrestDispositionsin California(1982-1984,1986-1989)CrimeinUrbanandRuralCalifornia (November1984andDecember1997)*DeathinCustody,California(May2005)*FelonyDrugArrestsinCalifornia,1985 (December1986)
JuvenileJusticeinCalifornia,1983(June 1984)MotorVehicleTheftinCalifornia (December1987)MotorVehicleTheftRecoveryData, 1983-1989(October1990)WomeninCrime:TheSentencingof FemaleDefendants(April1988)
REPORTSAdultFelonyArrestDispositionsin California(April1992)ConcealableFirearmsChargesinCalifornia (2000–2003)*CrimeinCaliforniaandtheUnitedStates (1983,1990,2000)*EffectivenessofStatutoryRequirements fortheRegistrationofSexOffenders–A ReporttotheCaliforniaStateLegislatureExecutiveSummaryoftheFinalReport– BlueRibbonCommissiononInmate PopulationManagement(January1990)TheJuvenileJusticeSysteminCalifornia: AnOverview(April1989)ParoleesReturnedtoPrisonandthe CaliforniaPrisonPopulation(January 1988)TargetHardening:ALiteratureReview (October1989)
REPORT SERIESReportonArrestsforBurglaryinCalifornia, 1998*ReportonArrestsforDomesticViolencein California,1998*ReportonArrestsforDrivingUnderthe InfluenceinCalifornia,1997*ReportonDrugArrestsinCalifornia,From 1990to2000(December2000)*ReportonJuvenileFelonyArrestsin California,1998(March2000)*ReportonViolentCrimesCommitted AgainstSeniorCitizensinCalifornia, 1998*
RESEARCH SERIESWhyDidtheCrimeRateDecreaseThrough 2000?(AndWhyMightitDecreaseor Increasein2000andBeyond?) (December2000)*
SpecialReporttotheLegislatureon SenateBill780(CaliforniaFreedomof AccesstoClinicandChurchEntrances ActandReproductiveRightsLaw EnforcementAct)(August2003)SpecialReporttotheLegislatureon SenateBill1608(FelonsandOthers withFirearms)(July2002)SpecialReporttotheLegislatureon SenateResolution18(CrimesCommitted AgainstHomelessPersons)(October 2002)*
MONOGRAPH SERIESConspicuousDepredation:Automobile TheftinLosAngeles,1904to1987 (March1990)ControllingFelonyPleaBargainingin California:TheImpactoftheVictim’s BillofRights(1986)DevelopmentofaWhiteCollarCrime Index(December1992)IncapacitationStrategiesandtheCareer Criminal(December1992)MeasuringWhiteCollarCrimein DepositoryInstitutions(December1993)Prosecutors’ResponsetoParentalChild Stealing:AStatewideStudy(April1995)Race&DelinquencyinLosAngeles JuvenileCourt,1950(December1990)SurveyReport:“TheExpansionofthe CriminalJusticeandPenalSystemin California–IsGreaterCoordination Required?”(December1988)
MISCELLANEOUSCaliforniaCriminalJusticeTimeLine, 1822-2000(June2001)*CrimeinCalifornia(April2001)*GangOrganizationandMigration/Drugs, Gangs&LawEnforcementProceedingsoftheAttorneyGeneral’s CrimeConference‘85(September1985)ProceedingsofSymposium‘87:White Collar/InstitutionalCrime–ItsMeasure- mentandAnalysis
For publications or assistance in obtaining statistical information or a customized statistical report, please contact:
California Department of JusticeBureau of Criminal Information and Analysis
Criminal Justice Statistics CenterSpecial Requests Unit
P.O. Box 903427Sacramento, CA 94203-4270
Fax: (916) 227-0427 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://ag.ca.gov/crime.php
Annual publications from 1999 through 2009 are also available on CD-ROM, including data tables in Excel spreadsheet format.
*AvailableontheInternet.
11/10