housing report final 8-26-15

Rockingham County Housing Analysis August 2015

1 | P a g e

This Housing Analysis seeks to determine the existing, expected and potential stock of residential housing units in Rockingham County. For purposes of this study, Housing Stock consists of five categories: housing units on property zoned for agriculture, timeshare units, all other housing units on residentially zoned property, expected units, and potential units. Expected Units includes a count of all platted but vacant parcels within residential subdivisions and any proffered number of units on planned or proffered residential developments. Potential Units includes all parcels over 2 acres; zoned R‐1, R‐2, R‐3, RV (Rural Village District), or within a town; and not limited by a proffered number of units.

The number of potential units has been estimated based upon the minimum lot size for single family detached units in each zoning district. Residential Units and Timeshare Units have been analyzed by unit type, by the number of bedrooms in the unit, and by value, defined as the land value plus the value of the improvements. Single family detached units, a subset of residential units, have been analyzed by lot size.

19221

1877

16217

3305

6427

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000Housing Stock: Existing, Expected, and Potential

Agriculture Dwelling

Timeshare Units

Residential Units

Expected Units

Potential Units

691

1316

288

986

3146

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000 Potential Lots

Town Units

RV Units

R3 Units

R2 Units

R1 Units

7%

19%

58%

13%3%

Bedrooms

1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom

4 Bedroom 5 + Bedroom

64%

5%

4%

12%

5% 10%

Unit Type

Single Family Detached Duplexes

Townhouses Apartments

Manufactured Homes Timeshare

Average home value: $186,715 Median home value: $162,500

Housing Values Quartiles:

Less than $117,900 $117,900 to $162,500 $162,500 to $232,700 More than $232,700

Average lot size: 1.055 acres Median lot size: .381 acre

Lot Size Quartiles:

More than 0.595 acre 0.381 to 0.595 acre 0.275 to 0.381 acre Less than 0.275 acre


2 | P a g e

Housing Types Do Not Include Agriculturally Zoned Properties

Edom, North River, and Port Republic districts have the highest percentages of

manufactured homes

Massanetta Springs and Bridgewater districts have the most diverse housing options

beyond single family detached homes

Bergton, Melrose, and Cross Keys districts are the only precincts with only single family

detached dwellings


3 | P a g e

District Precinct Agriculture Dwelling

Single Family Detached

APT/ Condo

Town‐house

Duplex MFD Home

Time‐share

1 Bergton Precinct 536 13 0 0 0 0 0

1 Broadway Precinct 0 944 334 213 73 32 0

1 Fulks Run Precinct 1155 103 2 0 0 5 0

1 Lacey Spring Precinct 646 92 0 0 0 1 0

1 Little North Mountain Precinct

564 15 8 0 0 0 0

1 Plains Precinct 661 134 0 0 0 3 0

1 Tenth Legion Precinct 732 77 0 0 0 5 0

1 Timberville Precinct 0 730 151 92 10 17 0

2 Dayton Precinct 0 499 126 0 0 0 0

2 Edom Precinct 1276 323 100 14 4 181 0

2 Mt Clinton Precinct 960 268 2 0 0 5 0

2 Silver Lake Precinct 893 662 6 48 127 0 0

2 Singers Glen Precinct 2198 97 1 0 0 2 0

3 Cross Keys Precinct 313 36 0 0 0 0 0

3 Crossroads Precinct 144 797 177 69 148 0 0

3 Grottoes Precinct 0 763 119 90 0 3 0

3 Keezletown Precinct 757 55 1 0 0 1 0

3 Massanetta Springs Precinct

73 682 206 196 431 0 0

3 Melrose Precinct 640 67 0 0 0 0 0

3 Port Republic Precinct 1037 95 0 0 0 124 0

4 Bridgewater Precinct 0 1274 391 52 72 1 0

4 Montezuma Precinct 708 316 6 0 9 0 0

4 Mt Crawford Precinct 0 131 27 12 0 0 0

4 North River Precinct 752 129 168 0 0 258 0

4 Ottobine Precinct 1520 212 0 0 0 13 0

5 Elkton Precinct 0 883 237 18 10 5 0

5 McGaheysville Precinct 788 612 25 0 68 7 0

5 South Fork Precinct 757 103 0 0 5 70 0

5 Stony Run Precinct 355 1185 0 6 7 5 1877

5 Swift Run Precinct 1752 226 0 0 0 78 0


4 | P a g e

Housing Values Do Not Include Agriculturally Zoned Properties

Crossroads precinct (79%) has the largest percentage of homes within the highest

quartile of home values

Port Republic precinct (65%) and North River precinct (64%) have the largest

percentages of homes within the lowest quartile


5 | P a g e

District Precinct 1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile

1 Bergton Precinct 1 8 5 0

1 Broadway Precinct 589 487 378 142

1 Fulks Run Precinct 38 37 22 12

1 Lacey Spring Precinct 17 34 27 15

1 Little North Mountain Precinct 10 7 5 1

1 Plains Precinct 37 45 37 18

1 Tenth Legion Precinct 37 28 13 4

1 Timberville Precinct 563 338 86 12

2 Dayton Precinct 159 150 182 134

2 Edom Precinct 275 139 119 71

2 Mt Clinton Precinct 15 50 77 133

2 Silver Lake Precinct 36 211 257 330

2 Singers Glen Precinct 18 30 33 19

3 Cross Keys Precinct 0 2 7 27

3 Crossroads Precinct 12 51 187 941

3 Grottoes Precinct 423 370 156 26

3 Keezletown Precinct 1 12 12 34

3 Massanetta Springs Precinct 160 236 557 540

3 Melrose Precinct 13 19 24 11

3 Port Republic Precinct 141 31 22 24

4 Bridgewater Precinct 292 448 655 395

4 Montezuma Precinct 14 72 96 153

4 Mt Crawford Precinct 53 44 33 40

4 North River Precinct 249 79 29 30

4 Ottobine Precinct 54 90 64 17

5 Elkton Precinct 561 324 193 80

5 McGaheysville Precinct 82 241 235 154

5 South Fork Precinct 82 45 36 15

5 Stony Run Precinct 129 701 912 1142

5 Swift Run Precinct 55 57 98 85


6 | P a g e

Lot Size Only Includes Single Family Detached Units

Bergton, Cross Keys, and Keezletown have the highest percentages of lot sizes within

the 4th quartile.

Dayton, McGaheysville, and Broadway have the most equal distribution of units within

each lot size quartile.

Timberville and Elkton districts have the highest percentage of homes within the lowest

quartile.


7 | P a g e

District Precinct 1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile

1 Bergton Precinct 0 0 0 13

1 Broadway Precinct 240 293 279 168

1 Fulks Run Precinct 0 0 9 95

1 Lacey Spring Precinct 1 4 8 79

1 Little North Mountain Precinct 1 0 1 13

1 Plains Precinct 4 16 20 94

1 Tenth Legion Precinct 0 151 25 52

1 Timberville Precinct 401 0 236 67

2 Dayton Precinct 155 146 144 73

2 Edom Precinct 47 21 103 176

2 Mt Clinton Precinct 1 9 123 135

2 Silver Lake Precinct 100 199 276 87

2 Singers Glen Precinct 1 3 16 77

3 Cross Keys Precinct 0 0 1 35

3 Crossroads Precinct 92 167 0 206

3 Grottoes Precinct 323 306 80 58

3 Keezletown Precinct 0 0 5 51

3 Massanetta Springs Precinct 135 45 945 125

3 Melrose Precinct 1 1 16 49

3 Port Republic Precinct 0 2 33 61

4 Bridgewater Precinct 304 459 432 146

4 Montezuma Precinct 29 64 105 130

4 Mt Crawford Precinct 20 22 62 39

4 North River Precinct 0 2 58 69

4 Ottobine Precinct 2 47 86 78

5 Elkton Precinct 514 169 157 113

5 McGaheysville Precinct 103 147 148 215

5 South Fork Precinct 17 11 29 48

5 Stony Run Precinct 176 793 798 54

5 Swift Run Precinct 1 5 21 199


8 | P a g e

Housing Stock Does Not Include Agriculturally Zoned Properties or Timeshare Units

Stony Run Election Precinct (Massanutten Resort) has the most existing units – primarily

timeshare units

Massanetta Springs Precinct is expected to nearly double the number of existing units

Elkton has the greatest potential number of units, while Fulks Run has the greatest

potential percentage increase


9 | P a g e

District Precinct Existing Expected Expected Growth Potential Potential Growth

1 Bergton Precinct 14 0 0% 0 0%

1 Broadway Precinct 1596 130 8% 366 23%

1 Fulks Run Precinct 109 1 1% 212 194%

1 Lacey Spring Precinct 93 0 0% 65 70%

1 Little North Mountain Precinct 23 0 0% 31 135%

1 Plains Precinct 137 0 0% 155 113%

1 Tenth Legion Precinct 82 3 4% 72 88%

1 Timberville Precinct 999 75 8% 0 0%

2 Dayton Precinct 625 27 4% 35 6%

2 Edom Precinct 604 210 35% 144 24%

2 Mt Clinton Precinct 275 13 5% 51 19%

2 Silver Lake Precinct 834 432 52% 89 11%

2 Singers Glen Precinct 100 0 0% 64 64%

3 Cross Keys Precinct 36 0 0% 13 36%

3 Crossroads Precinct 1191 110 9% 0 0%

3 Grottoes Precinct 975 1 0% 372 38%

3 Keezletown Precinct 59 0 0% 7 12%

3 Massanetta Springs Precinct 1493 1410 94% 837 56%

3 Melrose Precinct 67 2 3% 34 51%

3 Port Republic Precinct 218 83 38% 60 28%

4 Bridgewater Precinct 1790 103 6% 588 33%

4 Montezuma Precinct 335 1 0% 181 54%

4 Mt Crawford Precinct 170 1 1% 0 0%

4 North River Precinct 387 236 61% 18 5%

4 Ottobine Precinct 225 7 3% 280 124%

5 Elkton Precinct 1158 94 8% 1785 154%

5 McGaheysville Precinct 712 158 22% 559 79%

5 South Fork Precinct 178 0 0% 79 44%

5 Stony Run Precinct 2884 196 7% 81 3%

5 Swift Run Precinct 295 12 4% 242 82%


10 | P a g e


Elementary School



APT/ Condo

Town‐house

Duplex MFD Home

Time‐share

Cub Run 1392 982 417 275 489 173 0

Elkton 929 810 237 13 0 6 0

Fulks Run 1659 112 2 0 0 5 0

John C. Myers 936 1005 334 213 73 32 0

John Wayland 733 2067 524 53 79 1 0

Lacey Spring 1706 195 0 0 0 5 0

Linville Edom 965 244 5 0 0 11 0

McGaheysville 534 1606 10 6 52 14 1877

Mountain View 3618 958 68 0 6 6 0

Ottobine 1263 193 0 0 0 12 0

Peak View 800 950 187 0 122 257 0

Plains 1378 911 159 92 10 21 0

Pleasant Valley 832 284 25 59 123 1 0

River Bend 1761 358 0 5 10 145 0

South River 694 848 119 90 0 127 0

Approximately half of

the units in the

McGaheysville School

District are Timeshare

Units, which have no

impact on public

schools

Cub Run and John C.

Myers Districts have

the most non‐SFD units

Linville, Lacey Springs,

and Ottobine have the

highest percentages of

SFD units


11 | P a g e


Elementary School 1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile

Cub Run 371 324 753 855

Elkton 551 305 151 64

Fulks Run 39 45 24 11

John C. Myers 604 504 394 156

John Wayland 471 666 903 689

Lacey Spring 55 68 55 22

Linville Edom 55 85 84 31

McGaheysville 196 871 1058 1243

Mountain View 59 125 367 487

Ottobine 50 84 4 17

Peak View 264 148 161 779

Plains 613 404 138 37

Pleasant Valley 93 257 75 58

River Bend 133 100 164 113

South River 564 400 176 43

Peak View has the

highest percentage of

homes within the 4th

quartile

Plains and Elkton have

the highest

percentages of homes

within the 1st quartile

Riverbend and John

Wayland have the most

equal distributions of

housing values within

each quartile


12 | P a g e


Elementary School 1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile

Cub Run 241 205 328 244

Elkton 474 108 79 149

Fulks Run 0 0 7 105

John C. Myers 240 324 249 223

John Wayland 489 748 571 344

Lacey Spring 2 5 47 141

Linville Edom 20 19 68 142

McGaheysville 236 955 253 241

Mountain View 21 226 435 282

Ottobine 1 44 80 68

Peak View 60 379 487 276

Plains 406 178 132 206

Pleasant Valley 100 27 80 83

River Bend 54 106 44 193

South River 323 314 108 109

Fulks Run has the


units within the 4th

quartile

Elkton has the highest

percentage of units


John C Myers and Cub

Run have the most

equal distribution of lot

sizes within each

quartile


13 | P a g e


Elementary School Existing Expected Expected Growth Potential Potential Growth

Cub Run 2303 1258 55% 541 23%

Elkton 1071 65 6% 1886 176%

Fulks Run 119 1 1% 212 178%

John C. Myers 1658 130 8% 387 23%

John Wayland 2729 130 5% 698 26%

Lacey Spring 200 3 2% 145 73%

Linville Edom 255 5 2% 104 41%

McGaheysville 3368 211 6% 294 9%

Mountain View 1038 238 23% 231 22%

Ottobine 155 5 3% 256 165%

Peak View 1352 610 45% 786 58%

Plains 1192 75 6% 192 16%

Pleasant Valley 483 448 93% 45 9%

River Bend 510 42 8% 178 35%

South River 1183 84 7% 432 37%

Elkton school district

has the most growth

potential

Cub Run,

McGaheysville, and

John Wayland districts

have the most existing

units

Cub Run has the most

expected growth


14 | P a g e


Company Name Agriculture Dwelling


APT/ Condo

Town‐house

Duplex MFD Home

Time‐share

Timberville Volunteer Fire Company

950 867 159 92 10 20 0

New Market Volunteer Fire Department

231 17 0 0 0 0 0

Bridgewater Volunteer Fire Company

1253 2244 550 64 81 2 0

Weyers Cave Volunteer Fire Department

396 20 0 0 0 0 0

Port Road Station 1081 1583 551 265 579 257 0

Grottoes Volunteer Fire Company 1103 895 119 90 0 127 0

McGaheysville Volunteer Fire Company

1122 1837 26 6 80 81 1877

Elkton Volunteer Fire Company 2466 1167 237 18 10 84 0

Hose Company #4 2664 1288 108 62 131 187 0

Singers Glen Volunteer Fire Company

2188 99 1 0 0 2 0

Bergton Volunteer Fire Company 627 13 0 0 0 0 0

Broadway Volunteer Fire Company 2704 1198 336 213 73 38 0

Clover Hill Volunteer Fire Company 2441 295 0 0 0 18 0

Less than half of the

housing units served by

either the Port Road

Station or the

McGaheysville

Substation are Single

Family Detached units

Bergton, Weyers Cave,

and New Market

stations serve the least

diverse unit types


15 | P a g e


Company Name 1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile

Timberville Volunteer Fire Company 609 386 123 29

New Market Volunteer Fire Department 2 8 7 0

Bridgewater Volunteer Fire Company 521 710 978 736

Weyers Cave Volunteer Fire Department 7 3 1 9

Port Road Station 411 360 769 1507

Grottoes Volunteer Fire Company 565 401 189 75

McGaheysville Volunteer Fire Company 291 965 1154 1301

Elkton Volunteer Fire Company 617 405 314 176

Hose Company #4 363 406 435 545

Singers Glen Volunteer Fire Company 15 28 40 19

Bergton Volunteer Fire Company 1 8 5 0

Broadway Volunteer Fire Company 649 577 451 180

Clover Hill Volunteer Fire Company 65 129 91 28

The majority of homes

in the Timberville

District are within the

1st quartile

Nearly half of the

homes in the Port Road

station are within the

4th quartile

Hose Company #4 has

the most balanced

distribution of homes

across the quartiles


16 | P a g e



Timberville Volunteer Fire Company 406 167 132 162

New Market Volunteer Fire Department 0 0 0 17

Bridgewater Volunteer Fire Company 508 691 631 414

Weyers Cave Volunteer Fire Department 0 0 2 18

Port Road Station 226 214 763 380

Grottoes Volunteer Fire Company 323 308 109 155

McGaheysville Volunteer Fire Company 283 950 321 283

Elkton Volunteer Fire Company 528 175 123 341

Hose Company #4 149 227 503 409

Singers Glen Volunteer Fire Company 1 3 21 74

Bergton Volunteer Fire Company 0 0 0 13

Broadway Volunteer Fire Company 241 297 261 399

Clover Hill Volunteer Fire Company 2 50 102 141

All units in the Bergton

and New Market

districts are within the

4th quartile

Timberville and Elkton

stations have the

highest percentages of

homes within the 1st

quartile


17 | P a g e


Company Name Existing Expected Expected Growth

Potential Potential Growth

Timberville Volunteer Fire Company 1147 157 14% 181 16%

New Market Volunteer Fire Department 17 0 0% 0 0%

Bridgewater Volunteer Fire Company 2945 131 4% 822 28%

Weyers Cave Volunteer Fire Department 20 0 0% 0 0%

Port Road Station 3047 1606 53% 837 27%

Grottoes Volunteer Fire Company 1230 84 7% 446 36%

McGaheysville Volunteer Fire Company 3711 272 7% 699 19%

Elkton Volunteer Fire Company 1512 106 7% 2048 135%

Hose Company #4 1749 757 43% 358 20%

Singers Glen Volunteer Fire Company 102 2 2% 64 63%

Bergton Volunteer Fire Company 14 0 0% 0 0%

Broadway Volunteer Fire Company 1857 181 10% 633 34%

Clover Hill Volunteer Fire Company 313 8 3% 338 108%

McGaheysville, Port Rd,

and Bridgewater

stations serve the most

existing homes

The Elkton Volunteer

Fire Company district

has the potential to

increase by 135%

The Clover Hill

Volunteer Fire

Company district has

the potential to more

than double (109%)

Port Road station is

expected to grow the

most (53% increase)


18 | P a g e


Company Name Agriculture Dwelling


APT/ Condo

Town‐house

Duplex MFD Home

Time‐share

Bergton Station, Broadway Emergency Squad

627 13 0 0 0 0 0

Bridgewater Volunteer Rescue Squad

1333 2252 550 64 81 2 0

Broadway Emergency Squad 3884 2152 495 305 83 63 0

Clover Hill Volunteer Rescue Squad 2440 295 0 0 0 18 0

Elkton Emergency Squad 2467 1166 237 18 10 84 0

Grottoes Volunteer Rescue Squad 1614 908 119 90 0 127 0

Harrisonburg Rescue Squad 3415 2959 675 327 726 439 0

McGaheysville Station Elkton Vol. Rescue Squad

875 1658 10 6 64 81 1877

New Market Rescue 19 289 19 0 0 0 0 0

Singers Glen Volunteer Rescue Squad

2283 101 1 0 0 2 0

Harrisonburg Rescue

Squad district includes

the City of

Harrisonburg. Housing

Units with the City are

not included in this

report.

New Market and

Bergton rescue districts

serve the least variety

of unit type

Harrisonburg rescue

squad serves the most

non‐SFD units (besides

McGaheysville, which

serves mostly

Timeshares)


19 | P a g e



Bergton Station, Broadway Emergency Squad 1 8 5 0

Bridgewater Volunteer Rescue Squad 527 712 978 736

Broadway Emergency Squad 1299 995 587 215

Clover Hill Volunteer Rescue Squad 65 129 91 28

Elkton Emergency Squad 617 405 314 175

Grottoes Volunteer Rescue Squad 566 402 191 84

Harrisonburg Rescue Squad 761 814 1264 2072

McGaheysville Station Elkton Vol. Rescue Squad 263 883 1079 1275

New Market Rescue 19 2 8 8 1

Singers Glen Volunteer Rescue Squad 15 30 40 19

The Harrisonburg

rescue squad serves

the most homes within

the 4th quartile

Broadway and Elton

squads serve the most


quartile

Bridgewater district

has the most equal

distribution of homes

within each quartile


20 | P a g e



Bergton Station, Broadway Emergency Squad 0 0 0 13

Bridgewater Volunteer Rescue Squad 508 691 633 420

Broadway Emergency Squad 648 465 422 617

Clover Hill Volunteer Rescue Squad 2 50 102 141

Elkton Emergency Squad 528 175 123 340

Grottoes Volunteer Rescue Squad 323 308 109 168

Harrisonburg Rescue Squad 406 506 1296 751

McGaheysville Station Elkton Vol. Rescue Squad 250 884 262 262

New Market Rescue 19 0 0 0 19

Singers Glen Volunteer Rescue Squad 2 3 21 75

All units in the Bergton

and New Market

districts are within the

4th quartile

The Elkton squad

serves the highest

percentage of homes


The Bridgewater

district has the most

equal distribution of

units within each

quartile


21 | P a g e


Company Name Existing Expected Expected Growth

Potential Potential Growth

Bergton Station, Broadway Emergency Squad 14 290 2071% 0 0%

Bridgewater Volunteer Rescue Squad 2953 131 4% 787 27%

Broadway Emergency Squad 3096 209 7% 938 30%

Clover Hill Volunteer Rescue Squad 313 8 3% 338 108%

Elkton Emergency Squad 1511 106 7% 2048 136%

Grottoes Volunteer Rescue Squad 1243 84 7% 446 36%

Harrisonburg Rescue Squad 4911 2370 48% 1276 26%

McGaheysville Station Elkton Vol. Rescue Squad 3500 104 3% 495 14%

New Market Rescue 19 19 0 0% 0 0%

Singers Glen Volunteer Rescue Squad 104 2 2% 64 62%

The Harrisonburg

Rescue Squad district

has the most expected

growth (not including

any expected growth

within the City of

Harrisonburg)

The Elkton district has

the greatest potential

number of units and

the highest potential

percent increase

(136%)

Clover Hill Volunteer

Rescue Squad has the

second highest

potential percent

increase (108%)


22 | P a g e


Sheriff Patrol Zone



APT/Condo Townhouse Duplex MFD Home Timeshare

5 6963 900 45 14 4 198 0

6 2934 2236 576 265 647 388 0

7 3518 639 1 0 12 153 770

8 5782 1662 100 60 136 19 0

10 0 1274 391 52 72 1 0

11 0 945 334 213 73 32 0

12 0 499 126 0 0 0 0

13 0 883 237 18 10 5 0

14 0 759 119 90 0 3 0

15 11 995 0 6 0 0 1107

16 0 730 151 92 10 17 0

Sheriff Patrol Zones 1

through 4 are wholly

within the City of

Harrisonburg and are

not included in this

study.

Nearly half of all units

served by Patrol Zones

7 and 15 are timeshare

units

District 6 serves the

greatest variety of

housing types


23 | P a g e


Sheriff Patrol Zone 1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile

5 416 316 270 142

6 631 607 994 1689

7 242 182 476 667

8 211 503 557 701

10 292 448 655 395

11 589 487 379 142

12 159 150 182 134

13 561 324 193 80

14 423 366 156 26

15 29 665 609 610

16 563 338 86 12

District 16 has the



quartile

Districts 6 and 7 have

the highest

percentages of homes

within the 4th quartile


24 | P a g e


Sheriff Patrol Zone 1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile

5 55 43 160 641

6 310 339 923 661

7 55 143 109 331

8 152 343 641 524

10 304 459 365 146

11 240 293 240 169

12 155 146 125 73

13 514 169 87 113

14 323 304 75 57

15 158 692 121 24

16 401 151 111 67

Over 50% of the homes

within districts 5 and 7

are within the 4th

quartile

Over 50% of the homes

in districts 13 and 16

are within the 1st

quartile

Districts 11 and 12

have the most equal

distribution of units

within each quartile


25 | P a g e


Sheriff Patrol Zone Existing Expected Expected Growth Potential Potential Growth

5 1144 137 12% 758 66%

6 3921 1905 49% 1426 36%

7 1567 31 2% 441 28%

8 1972 625 32% 645 33%

10 1790 173 10% 588 33%

11 1597 142 9% 366 23%

12 625 27 4% 35 6%

13 1158 77 7% 1785 154%

14 971 1 0% 372 38%

15 1913 113 6% 15 1%

16 999 75 8% 0 0%

District 6, with the

most existing units, is

expected to increase by

49%

District 8 is expected to

increase by 32%

District 13 has the

potential to increase by

154%

District 5 has the

potential to increase by

66%

Rockingham County Housing Analysis Appendix A: Subdivision Housing Stock Detail

August 2015

26 | P a g e

SUBDIVISION ELECTION DISTRICT

UNIT TYPE EXISTING EXPECTED

ALGER LANE TOWNHOMES 1 Apartment 13 0

BROADLAND 1 Single Family Detached 4 0

BROADMOOR VILLAGE 1 Single Family Detached 18 3

BROADVIEW 1 Single Family Detached 14 0

BROADWAY SOUTH 1 Single Family Detached 48 0

COYOTE RUN 1 Single Family Detached 41 29

FARMVIEW ESTATES 1 Single Family Detached 4 0

GAP VIEW 1 Single Family Detached 17 0

GREGORY TURNER 1 Single Family Detached 2 0

GRIFFIN 1 Townhouse 25 0

HALLER M. BOWMAN 1 Single Family Detached 5 0

HEARTHSTONE HILL 1 Single Family Detached 9 0

HERITAGE HILLS 1 Single Family Detached 72 18

HERITAGE VILLAS 1 Townhouse 68 0

HOMESTEAD VILLAGE 1 Single Family Detached 26 1

I & J HEIGHTS 1 Single Family Detached 2 0

LACEY HEIGHTS 1 Single Family Detached 44 3

LEGION HILLS 1 Single Family Detached 109 22

LIVING WATERS 1 Single Family Detached; Townhouse

6 46

LONE PINE VILLAGE 1 Townhouse 10 0

LONE PINE VILLAGE II 1 Single Family Detached 8 1

MOUNTAINEER HEIGHTS 1 Single Family Detached 63 27

NEFF & MEYERS 1 Single Family Detached 83 0

NORTHERN RIDGE 1 Single Family Detached 7 0

PINELAND 1 Single Family Detached 12 0


August 2015

27 | P a g e



RIDGEVIEW 1 Townhouse 50 0

RIGGLEMAN APARTMENTS 1 Apartment 16 0

RUSTIC KNOLL 1 Single Family Detached 32 8

SMITHLAND HEIGHTS 1 Single Family Detached 10 0

SPOTSWOOD MANOR 1 Single Family Detached 41 0

SUNSET VILLAS 1 Townhouse 28 0

THE ORCHARDS 1 Townhouse 40 0

TIMBER HILLS 1 Single Family Detached; Apartment

85 0

TIMBERCREST 1 Single Family Detached 51 6

TRIMBLE HEIGHTS 1 Duplex 4 40

TRUMBO 1 Single Family Detached; Duplex

4 0

VIOLA G. LOHR 1 Single Family Detached 5 0

WALNUT RIDGE 1 Single Family Detached; Duplex; Townhouse

89 0

WEST VIEW 1 Single Family Detached 27 3

WINDERMERE 1 Single Family Detached; Duplex

65 1

APPLE ORCHARD 2 Single Family Detached 14 2

BELMONT 2 Single Family Detached 466 22

CEDAR POINT TOWNHOMES 2 Townhouse 27 10

CHARLES A. FLICK 2 Single Family Detached 10 1

COVENANT HEIGHTS 2 Single Family Detached; Duplex; Townhouse

118 3

DALE HEIGHTS 2 Single Family Detached 5 0

DAPIKE 2 Single Family Detached 6 1


August 2015

28 | P a g e



DAYTON WEST 2 Single Family Detached 3 2

FOTH 2 Single Family Detached 2 1

GOOD AND KEARNS 2 Single Family Detached 6 1

GRANDVIEW HILLS 2 Single Family Detached 28 0

HAMPSHIRE ESTATES 2 Single Family Detached 3 2

HARTMAN 2 Single Family Detached 12 0

J. WILSON LEE 2 Single Family Detached 2 1

KAUFFMAN 2 Single Family Detached 4 0

LORD'S ACRE 2 Single Family Detached 4 0

MEADOWBROOK 2 Single Family Detached 34 109

MONTE VISTA 2 Single Family Detached 109 11

SHANDS HILL 2 Single Family Detached; Apartment

47 18

SKYVIEW ESTATES 2 Single Family Detached 18 7

SOUTH BREEZE ESTATES 2 Single Family Detached 52 12

SOUTHSIDE HEIGHTS 2 Duplex 64 2

SOUTHSIDE HEIGHTS TOWNHOMES

2 Townhouse 42 0

SPRING HILL 2 Single Family Detached 11 1

WARREN S BURKHOLDER 2 Single Family Detached 9 2

WILLOW WEST 2 Single Family Detached 71 12

WINDY HEIGHTS ESTATES 2 Single Family Detached; Duplex

7 8

WOODLAND ESTATES 2 Single Family Detached 4 0

ALFRED E. BOYERS 3 Single Family Detached 4 1

AMBROSIA TOWNHOMES 3 Townhouse 12 0


August 2015

29 | P a g e



BARRINGTON 3 Single Family Detached 169 1

BATTLEFIELD ESTATES 3 Single Family Detached 136 13

BRIARCREST 3 Single Family Detached 6 0

BRIDLEWOOD 3 Single Family Detached 21 9

C & W 3 Single Family Detached 12 0

CROSSROADS FARM 3 Single Family Detached; Duplex

155 0

CULLISON CREEK 3 Single Family Detached; Duplex

34 6

FK POWERS 3 Single Family Detached 4 2

GLENN‐LOUISE 3 Single Family Detached 4 0

GRACE LEE ESTATES 3 Single Family Detached 24 0

GREAT OAKS 3 Single Family Detached 16 0

GREENPORT 3 Single Family Detached; Duplex

25 35

HAMLET HILL ESTATES 3 Duplex 4 0

HEATHERTON 3 Single Family Detached; Duplex

19 0

HIGHLAND PARK 3 Single Family Detached 118 21

KENTSHIRE ESTATES 3 Single Family Detached 24 2

LAKE POINTE 3 Single Family Detached 45 5

LAKE POINTE VILLAGE 3 Single Family Detached; Duplex

33 3

LAKEWOOD 3 Single Family Detached 257 13

LEONARD EDWARD ARMSTRONG

3 Single Family Detached 4 0

MADISON VILLAGE 3 Single Family Detached 96 54


August 2015

30 | P a g e



MAGNOLIA RIDGE 3 Single Family Detached; Duplex

80 15

MASSANETTA SPRINGS COTTAGE COMMUNITY

3 Single Family Detached 51 24

MILL RACE COURT 3 Townhouse 9 0

MISTY MEADOWS 3 Duplex 64 0

OAKDALE TOWNHOMES 3 Townhouse 10 0

PRESTON LAKE 3 Single Family Detached; Townhouse

61 758

ROSEDALE 3 Duplex 80 0

SHADY CREEK 3 Single Family Detached; Duplex; Townhouse

34 0

SHANNON ACRES 3 Single Family Detached; Duplex

3 0

SHERWOOD FOREST 3 Duplex; Apartment 94 0

SPRING OAKS 3 Townhouse 111 19

SUNRISE 3 Single Family Detached 4 0

TAYLOR GROVE 3 Townhouse; Apartment 105 0

TAYLOR SPRING 3 Townhouse 128 0

THE GLEN AT CROSS KEYS 3 Duplex 54 20

THE HILL GROUP DEVELOPMENT 3 Single Family Detached 8 1

THE KNOLLS 3 Single Family Detached 11 0

TOWN & COUNTRY LANDING 3 Duplex 12 0

TWIN GABLES 3 Townhouse 17 0

WELSTONE 3 Single Family Detached 2 1

WHISPERING HILLS 3 Single Family Detached 15 0


August 2015

31 | P a g e



ASHBY VILLA 4 Single Family Detached; Duplex

39 0

BRENTWOOD MANUFACTURED HOME

4 Manufactured Home 36 58

BRIDGEPORT 4 Single Family Detached; Apartment

63 0

BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE 4 Single Family Detached 58 0

BUTTERMILK RUN ESTATES 4 Single Family Detached 4 0

C.E. SHIFLETT ESTATE 4 Single Family Detached 6 2

C.W. ALLMAN & W.O. MINNICK 4 Single Family Detached 1 1

CANNERY WOODS 4 Single Family Detached 3 0

CLOVER HILL RURITAN 4 Single Family Detached 7 0

COUNTRY ESTATES 4 Single Family Detached; Apartment

20 0

COUNTRYSIDE 4 Single Family Detached 16 0

FAIRFIELD ACRES 4 Single Family Detached 8 0

FOXCROFT 4 Single Family Detached 73 0

GRANDMA'S 4 Single Family Detached 8 0

GREENFIELD 4 Single Family Detached 27 0

H & H ESTATES 4 Single Family Detached 21 0

LILLY GARDENS 4 Single Family Detached 29 0

MILLVIEW ESTATES 4 Single Family Detached; Duplex

22 8

NORTH RIVER LANDING 4 Single Family Detached; Townhouse

15 0

OAK MEADOWS 4 Single Family Detached 48 1

OLD MILL LANDING 4 Single Family Detached 68 1


August 2015

32 | P a g e



PARKSIDE VILLAGE 4 Single Family Detached 21 40

RIVER HEIGHTS 4 Single Family Detached 4 0

SADDLEBROOK PLANTATION 4 Single Family Detached; Townhouse

46 1

SAGEFIELD 4 Single Family Detached 16 0

SANSTON SITES 4 Single Family Detached 84 0

STONE SPRING ROAD ESATES 4 Single Family Detached 2 5

SUGAR CAMP 4 Single Family Detached 5 0

SUNSET 4 Single Family Detached 31 2

SUNSHINE 4 Single Family Detached 12 0

THE ALLEN 4 Single Family Detached 15 0

THE SPRINGS AT OSCEOLA 4 Single Family Detached 10 95

TWIN PINE ESTATES 4 Single Family Detached 29 1

W.D. EVERS 4 Single Family Detached; Duplex

5 0

WINDSOR ESTATES 4 Single Family Detached; Duplex

111 1

WINDSOR WEST 4 Single Family Detached; Townhouse

81 51

WRIGHT 4 Single Family Detached 11 1

ANSELL 5 Single Family Detached 1 0

ASHBY GLEN 5 Single Family Detached 23 1

BERNARD F ALLEN 5 Single Family Detached 17 0

DONNAGAIL 5 Single Family Detached; Apartment

109 1

DOWNEY KNOLLS 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex

7 16


August 2015

33 | P a g e



ELKWOOD 5 Single Family Detached 62 7

GRASSINGTON PLACE 5 Single Family Detached 3 6

GREENVIEW HILLS 5 Single Family Detached 125 70

HELEN C. TAYLOR 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex

5 0

LIBERTY HEIGHTS 5 Single Family Detached; Apartment

31 14

MANORWOOD ESTATES 5 Single Family Detached 25 3

MASSANUTTEN UNIT 1 5 Single Family Detached 69 1








MOUNTAIN MEADOW ESTATES 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex

38 8

OVERBROOK 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex

41 127

PEAKVIEW 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex

14 0

PINEY MOUNTAIN ACRES 5 Single Family Detached 104 12

QUAIL RUN 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex; Townhouse

71 8

RIVER BEND 5 Single Family Detached; Manufactured Home

12 4


August 2015

34 | P a g e



SOUTH MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex

69 2

SPOTSWOOD VILLAGE 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex

27 0

STONY RUN 5 Single Family Detached 34 1

SUMMIT 5 Single Family Detached 3 0

THREE LEAGUES 5 Single Family Detached 37 3

VILLAGE GREEN 5 Single Family Detached 3 6

VILLAGE WOODS 5 Single Family Detached 60 0

WAVERLY FARMS 5 Single Family Detached 5 1

WAVERLY NUMBER 2 5 Single Family Detached 8 7

WHISPERING PINES 5 Single Family Detached 28 1

WILLOW OAKS 5 Single Family Detached; Duplex; Townhouse

14 32

WINDSONG HILLS 5 Single Family Detached 10 0

WOODBRIDGE 5 Single Family Detached 64 16

WOODSTONE MEADOWS 5 Single Family Detached 26 0

housing report final 8-26-15

Documents