how did we do? evaluating results from the …how did we do? evaluating results from the...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
How Did We Do?Evaluating Results from the
Reengineered SIPP Field Tests
Matthew C. MarlayJason M. Fields
U.S. Census Bureau
This work is released to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion of work in progress. Any views or opinions expressed in the paper are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of
the U.S. Census Bureau.
1
![Page 2: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
Background and Status
Brief History of the SIPP
Reengineering and Field Tests
Survey Content and Design
Evaluation
What’s Next?
2
![Page 3: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The SIPP MissionThe mission of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) is to provide a nationally representative sample for evaluating:
Annual and sub-annual dynamics of income,
Movements into and out of government transfer programs,
Family and social context of individuals and households, and
Interactions between these items.
3
![Page 4: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Goals for SIPP Reengineering
The reengineered survey:
Includes a new household survey data collection
Modernizes the data collection instrument
Reduces respondent burden
Requires fewer resources than classic SIPP program
Improves processing efficiency
Is releasable to the public in a timely manner
4
![Page 5: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Notes on the New Design
Scope Similar to classic SIPP
Broader than core / includes key topical module content in each wave
Better integration of concepts EHC generates integrated reporting across domains
Topics previously implemented as add-on modules now integrated
Facilitate ‘hooks’ to enable supplements for additional content
![Page 6: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Notes on the New Design
Increased efficiency in processing and producing data products
Flexible in administration (dynamic interview month and reference period)
Dependent data incorporated into EHC instrument
Reduced cost through annual administration
Improved management through realigned structure and improved monitoring using all available tools – especially paradata
![Page 7: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Summary: Classic vs. New SIPP
SIPP CLASSIC NEW SIPP
Instrument DOS-based Blaise/C#
Interview Frequency 3x/year Annual
Interview Type Personal visit/telephone Personal visit/telephone
Reference Period Previous 4 months Previous year
Panel Length 2.5-5 years 4 years (planned)
Sample Size 12-52,000 households (W1) 52,000 households (W1)
Universe Civilian, non-institutional Civilian, non-institutional
Content Comprehensive Comprehensive
File Structure Complex Simplified
7
![Page 8: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SIPP Design Change - Example8
Current SIPP - Calendar year 1
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Calendar year 2
I-1Ref I-2Reference period – I-2
I-3Reference period – I-3I-4Reference period – I-4
I-1Ref. pd. I-1
(Rotation Group 1)
(Rotation Group 2)
I-1Reference pd. – I-1
(Rotation Group 3)
I-1Reference period – I-1
(Rotation Group 4)
Re-engineering - Calendar year 1
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Calendar year 2
EHC InterviewReference period
I-2Reference period – I-2I-3Reference period – I-3
I-4Reference period – I-4
I-2Reference period – I-2I-3Reference period – I-3
I-4Reference period – I-4
I-2Reference period – I-2I-3Reference period – I-3
I-4Reference period – I-4
![Page 9: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SIPP 2014 Contents9
![Page 10: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SIPP Reengineering Field Tests- Proof of concept test
- 2008 paper and pencil re-interview test
- EHC CAPI test- 2010 Integrated Blaise and C# instrument prototype
- CAPI revised test - 2011 Test improvements to the Wave 1 instrument, training, and
expand sample to all regional offices.- Inter-wave locating experiment- 2012 Test Wave 2 concepts and instrument, examine movers and
attrition issues, dependent interviewing methods and refine training.- 2013 Wave 3 interview allows household members to return and
additional mover and dependent interviewing evaluation
- 2014 SIPP EHC-based instrument is the production SIPP instrument
10
![Page 11: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Evaluations
• Key indicators by topic – evaluated against as many sources as possible
• False and mistimed transitions – recall or seams
• Issues related to successful use of dependent data
• Flexibility for Interviewer/Respondent interaction
• Mover individuals – locating procedures and tools
• Changing respondents – Data quality comparisons
• Respondent Identification Policy
• Paradata evaluation and integration
![Page 12: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Topics with administrative records Topics without administrative records
Employment and earnings Asset ownership Housing subsidies
Medicaid (12 out of 20 states) Child support Citizenship
Medicare Disability Poverty
OASDI Education Residence
SNAP (NY state) Health insurance
SSI Household composition
TANF (NY state) Unemployment Insurance
2011 SIPP-EHC (WAVE 1)
2012 SIPP-EHC (WAVE 2)
WAVE 5 WAVE 6 WAVE 7 WAVE 8 WAVE 9 WAVE 10 WAVE 11
SIPP-EHC
2008 SIPP
2010 2011
12
Evaluations
![Page 13: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Monthly Rates for CY2010 and 2011: SIPP and SIPP-EHC
18%
28%
2010 201146%
56%
2010 2011
9%
19%
0%
10%
-2%
8%
-2%
8%
11%
21%
27%
37%
Employment*
Unemployment Insurance*
TANF
SNAP*
OASDI
Medicare
Medicaid* SSI*
13
![Page 14: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
$209
$200
Median Monthly Amounts, CY2011:SIPP and SIPP-EHC
$698
$654
$0 $1,000 $2,000
$840
$785
$400
$388
$484
$900
$2,033
$1,947
$0 $1,000 $2,000
OASDI*
Earnings*
Unemployment Insurance*
SSI*
SNAP
TANF
14
![Page 15: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SIPP-EHC Reporting Accuracy in CY2011
Monthly Annual Amounts
OASDI + + +
SNAP + + +
SSI + + -
TANF + + +
Medicare + +
Medicaid + +
Employment +
Earnings +
15
![Page 16: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
False Negatives and False Positives
16
![Page 17: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
False Negative Rates for CY201117
S
I
P
P
E
H
C0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Medicaid* Medicare* OASDI SNAP SSI*
![Page 18: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
False Positive Rates for CY201118
S
I
P
P
E
H
C
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Medicaid Medicare* OASDI SNAP* SSI*
![Page 19: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
*= Estimates are significantly different at the p < .10 levelSource: U.S. Census Bureau, Survey of Income and Program Participation, 2008 Panel Waves 5-8, 2011 SIPP-EHC.
Measuring School Enrollment in the 2011 SIPP-EHC Field Test. Stephanie Ewert and Sarah Crissey, January 2012 - FCSM
Percent Enrolled by Age (Adults 15+): SIPP 2008 and SIPP-EHC 2011
![Page 20: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Survey of Income and Program Participation, Panel 2008 Waves 5-8, 2010 SIPP-EHC, 2011 SIPP-EHC.
Measuring School Enrollment in the 2011 SIPP-EHC Field Test. Stephanie Ewert and Sarah Crissey, January 2012 - FCSM
Percent Enrolled by Month (Adults 15+):SIPP 2008, SIPP-EHC 2010, and SIPP-EHC 2011
![Page 21: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Mover Rates: 2008 SIPP and 2011 SIPP-EHC
21
Evaluating Residence History Information in the SIPP-EHC. Matthew Marlay and Peter Mateyka, January 2012 - FCSM
![Page 22: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Initial Evaluation Conclusions
• SIPP-EHC and SIPP produce estimates that with few exceptions are not substantially different.
• SIPP-EHC agrees with administrative records data at least as well as SIPP in nearly every case.
• As in SIPP, transitions fall disproportionately on seams.
22
![Page 23: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
• Lots to be excited about!
• More evaluation
– CY2013 comparisons to 2008 Panel
– Administrative data comparisons
– Topic Flag imputation model
– Look at incidence of on-seam transitions in data from the just-completed 2013 SIPP-EHC field test
• User outreach
– Website overhaul
– Orlin system
– Workshops
So….What’s Next?23
![Page 25: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
2014 SIPP: Content HighlightsDemographics: • Roster: Interview-month household
residents
• Roster of people you lived with during the year but who aren’t in the interview month household (Type 2)
• Age, race, Hispanic origin, sex
• Relationship to householder, including options for same-sex partners and spouses
• Marital status, spouse pointer, year of marriage, times married, ever widowed, ever divorced, fertility screener
25
![Page 26: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2014 SIPP: Content HighlightsDemographics:• Gender neutral parent identification
(Parent 1 and Parent 2)
• Type of parent for parent 1 and 2
• Nativity, citizenship, year moved to U.S., immigration status
• Education: Attainment, vocational/technical, professional certificates and licenses
• Armed forces service: Veteran status, period of service, active duty
26
![Page 27: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Residency:
• Up to 5 residences during the calendar
year for each person
• Tenure status of each residence
• Public housing status: Housing subsidy
receipt, voucher receipt
• Reason for moving to address
• Left censor: Year and month moved
into January address, tenure of prior
residence
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights27
![Page 28: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Marital History:
• Up to 3 marital status spells
• Monthly marital status, with spouse
pointer
• Monthly cohabitation status, with
partner pointer
• Registered domestic partner item for
cohabitations
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights28
![Page 29: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Educational Enrollment:
• Up to 3 spells of educational enrollment
• Grade attended
• School type (public, private, charter,
home)
• Enrollment type (full-time/part-time)
• Grade repetition
• Head Start for children 7 and under
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights29
![Page 30: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Labor Force:
• Up to 7 discrete job/business timelines, each with 2
spells possible
• Timeline for additional work beyond the first 7 jobs
• Type of pay/pay rate
• Job earnings and business profits
• # of hours usually worked per week
• Changes in earnings or hours worked (up to 3)
• Industry, occupation, and class of worker
• Business/employer name, size, type, address
• Union status
• Incorporation status
• Presence of partners (business)
• Time away without pay
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights30
![Page 31: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Unemployment:
• Spells of unemployment
• Time away from work
• Time out of the labor force
• Reason not working
• Availability for work
• Reason not available
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights31
![Page 32: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Commuting:
• Mode(s) of travel
• Time to work
• Miles to work
• Costs for a typical week
• Reimbursement of costs
Work Schedule:
• Days worked
• Start and stop times
• Working from home
• Type of schedule
• Reason for schedule
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights32
![Page 33: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Programs:
• Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
• Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
• Pass-through child support payments
• Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
(SNAP – Food Stamps)
• General Assistance
• Women, Infants, and Children’s Nutrition Program
(WIC)
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights33
![Page 34: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Programs:
• Up to 3 spells per year recorded for each program
• Who in the household is covered
• Ownership of the coverage
• Reasons for starting and stopping
• Amount received each month
• Up to three changes in amounts
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights34
![Page 35: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Health Insurance (in EHC):
• Private, Medicare, Medicaid, Military, and
Other Coverage timelines
• Two timelines for private coverage to allow
overlapping spells
• Who in the household is covered
• Whether anyone outside household covered
• Ownership of the coverage
• Type of coverage
• Cost
• Type of private plan
• Type of deductible
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights35
![Page 36: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Health Insurance Follow-up (post-EHC):
• State-based health insurance exchange use
• Premiums and reimbursement
• Reconciliation of time without coverage
• Reasons for not being covered
• Reasons no private if employed but not covered
• Reasons no public if not covered at all
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights36
![Page 37: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Programs (Annual and Other):
• Paid care of children or disabled persons so that
a person could work, attend training, or look
for work in December of reference year
• Total cost of that care in December
• VA benefits (monthly amts.)
• Social Security retirement income and
deductions for Medicare (monthly amts.)
• Worker’s compensation (monthly amts.)
• Unemployment compensation (monthly amts.)
• Energy assistance
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights37
![Page 38: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Programs (Annual and Other):
• Free and reduced-price meal programs
• Lump-sum payments
• Disability income
• Retirement income
• Miscellaneous cash income
• Survivor benefits
• Child support and alimony received
• Support payments made
• EITC receipt and tax filing status
• Other training, food, clothing, cash, and
housing assistance
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights38
![Page 39: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Assets – Income, Joint Holdings, and Balances/Values for:• Checking and savings
• Money market accounts or funds
• Certificates of deposit
• Mutual funds
• Stocks
• Municipal and corporate bonds
• Government securities and savings bonds
• Royalties
• Rental property and rental property mortgage balance
• Other mortgages
• Miscellaneous investments
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights39
![Page 40: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Other Assets:• Real estate owned, market value, and balance
owed
• Vehicles (up to 3 per household):
– Use
– Make
– Model
– Year
– Balance owed
• Business value and debt
• Retirement account balances
• Unsecured liabilities
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights40
![Page 41: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Medical Expenditures:• Overall health status
• Medical out-of-pocket expenses
• Health care utilization
• Hospitalization
• Sick days
• Doctor visits
• Dental visits/teeth lost
• Drug coverage
• Insurance premium payments
• Medical visits by uninsured
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights41
![Page 42: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Disability:• Sensory disabilities (sight and hearing)
• For adults: Serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, making decisions, walking or climbing stairs, dressing or bathing, doing errands, finding a job or remaining employed, prevented from working
• For children: Serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, making decisions, walking or climbing stairs, dressing or bathing, playing with children of the same age, doing regular school work
• For young children: A developmental condition or delay that limits ordinary activity
• SSA: Disability section in the 2014 supplement
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights42
![Page 43: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Fertility:
• Roster and ages for children birthed/fathered
• Identification of ‘other parent’ if not resident,
enabling multi-partner fertility measure
• Grandparent indicator
Parents’ Nativity and Mortality:
• Asked about biological parents
• Collected for both mother and father
• Date of birth
• Country of birth
• Mortality status
• Month/year of death
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights43
![Page 44: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Child Care:
• Type of arrangements used
• Which children used each
• Weekly amount paid for child care
• Assistance with costs
• Time lost from work related to child care
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights44
![Page 45: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Child Well-Being:
• Eating dinner with parents
• Reading to and outings with children under 6
• School engagement, school effort
• Grade repetition, suspension, expulsion
• Gifted classes
• Sports, lessons, club participation, religious
lessons
Adult/Material Well-Being:
• Problems with housing, pests, plumbing
• Environmental noise, trash, safety
• Ability to pay mortgage or utilities
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights45
![Page 46: How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the …How Did We Do? Evaluating Results from the Reengineered SIPP Field Tests Matthew C. Marlay Jason M. Fields U.S. Census Bureau This work](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050202/5f55a0cc1daa840d5979490b/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Food Security:
• Able to buy enough food
• Able to eat balanced meals
• Cut size of meals, and, if so, how often
• Defer food to children
• Hungry because not enough money for food
2014 SIPP: Content Highlights46