how do le ds compare with lightfair 1-1-11

171
1 HOW DO LEDs COMPARE WITH HIGH PERFORMANCE FLUORESCENT INDUCTION HALOGEN PLASMA HID MAY 15, 2 - 5 PM STAN WALERCZYK, CLEP, LC LIGHTING WIZARDS

Upload: california-center-for-sustainable-energy

Post on 28-Jan-2015

110 views

Category:

Business


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

1

HOW DO LEDs COMPARE WITH HIGH PERFORMANCE

FLUORESCENTINDUCTIONHALOGENPLASMA

HID

MAY 15, 2 - 5 PM

STAN WALERCZYK, CLEP, LC

LIGHTING WIZARDS

Page 2: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

2

STAN WALERCZYK’S BIO• 22 years experience

– Distribution, maintenance, installer, retrofit contractor, fixture designer, consultant, lighting designer, policy maker, researcher

• 500+ projects• 30+ published articles• 600+ seminars

– Including 4 Lightfairs & 3 IES Annual Conferences

• IES Member 1995 - 2008– Currently on Visual Effects of Lamp Spectral Distribution Committee

• Certified Lighting Energy Professional by AEE– CLEP Review Board

• Lighting Certified by NCQLP• Consultant for California Title 20 and Federal EPACT• Consultant for Army Corp of Engineers CERL• Assisted on DOE spectrally enhanced lighting research• DOE CALiPER Guidance Committee

Page 3: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

3

FORMAT• Since so many slides and not that

much time– I will go pretty fast through many slides

• You can go through details in slides later on your own

– Please hold your questions to the end or after then end

• At least one break

Page 4: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

4

DISCLAIMER• I use to feel that I was totally on top of the subjects

that I would speak on• But now with all of the developments with LEDs,

OLEDs, light emitting plasma and even incumbent technologies for interiors and exteriors, it is almost impossible for one person to be on top of everything

• If any of you know significant details on any of today’s material, please share it– Without being an infomercial

• Plus there could be a bunch of brand new and very good stuff in the exhibit halls this week

Page 5: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

5

TERMINOLOGY• Since I deal mainly with building

owners, facility managers, retrofit contractors and ESCOs, I typically use terms that they understand, such as– Fixture instead of luminaire– Out of fixture lumens per watt instead of

absolute testing– LED fixture instead of SSL fixture

Page 6: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

6

NO ENDORSEMENTS

• Although several manufacturers and models are listed, none are endorsed

• Easier to talk about specifics than generalities

Page 7: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

7

BACKGROUND INFO• Please raise your hand if you are already aware of

– DOE Solid State Lighting Program, including CALiPER, etc.– Postings: From the Desk of Jim Brodrick– Lighting Facts– Energy Star– DesignLights Consortium SSL Qualified Product List– L Prize– Lighting For Tomorrow SSL Awards– Next Generation Luminaires Design Competition– Lighting Research Center’s Solid State Lighting– LEDs Magazine – Architectural SSL Magazine– L70, LM79 & LM80

• For those of you who are not familiar with some of them, you can get information on the following slides, that I will skip and start on slide 16

Page 8: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

8

HELPFUL WEBSITES• Department of Energy Solid-State Lighting

– Google search ‘doe ssl’• CALiPER test reports• Benchmark reports• Gateway studies• Fact sheets• Webinars• More

Page 9: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

9

HELPFUL WEBSITES• Department of Energy Solid-State Lighting

– Lighting Facts• www.lightingfacts.com

– LEDs For Interior Applications• PDF of March 18 webcast• www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ssl/events_detail.html?

event_id=4163

Page 10: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

10

HELPFUL WEBSITES• Department of Energy

– Commercial Building Energy Alliances• Technology and System Specification

Development–LED Refrigerated Case Lighting–And there are others

• www2.eere.energy.gov/buildings/alliances/technologies.html

Page 11: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

11

HELPFUL EMAIL• Postings: From the Desk of Jim Brodrick

– About once a week– March 16 version focused on how bad LED T8s are

– www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ssl/postings.html

[email protected]

Page 12: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

12

HELPFUL WEBSITES• Energy Star

– www.energystar.gov

• DesignLights Consortium SSL Qualified Product List– www.designlights.org/

solidstate.about.QualifiedProductsList_Publicv2.php

• L Prize– www.lightingprize.org

Page 13: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

13

HELPFUL WEBSITES• Lighting For Tomorrow SSL Awards

– More residential– Awards every September– www.lightingfortomorrow.com

• Next Generation Luminaires Design Competition– More commercial– Awards every January– www.ngldc.org

Page 14: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

14

HELPFUL WEBSITES• Lighting Research Center

– www.lrc.rpi.edu/programs/solidstate/index.asp • LEDs Magazine

– www.ledsmagazine.com

• Architectural SSL Magazine– www.architecturalssl.com

Page 15: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

15

L70, LM79 & LM80• L70

– Rated life of LEDs, based when still have 70% of initial lumens– Really projections

• LM79– Total flux (light output), electrical power (wattage), efficacy

(lumen/watt), chromaticity out of the complete product or luminaire (fixture)

• LM80– Lumen depreciation of LED chips from LED manufacturers, which

product manufacturers use with the thermal design of their products

– Typically LED manufacturers test their chips for 6000 hours and based on lumen depreciation over that time, useable life of the chips is extrapolated until L70 is reached

– Within TM21 the IES is considering that life should not be extrapolated more than 6 times testing duration

– LM80 is not the rated life of an LED product, because drivers, electrical connections, product integrity, etc. may fail before the LEDs

Page 16: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

16

POINTS TO

PONDER

Page 17: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

17

RAISE THE BAR• It is more than just if LEDs are cost effective to

replace or instead of using not very good base case• It is if LEDs are cost effective compared to other high

performance technologies• For example, a garage may have or is planned to get

ceiling fixtures with 175W quartz pulse start MH and magnetic ballast, which is not the best solution– Yes, LED ceiling fixtures, maybe with high/low occupancy

sensors, would be cost effective– But electronically ballasted 100W ceramic pulse start MH

or bi-level T8s may be more cost effective for specific applications

Page 18: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

18

DOLLARS PER 1000 LUMENS• DOE has been doing a good job on this

– LED devices (not fixtures or replacement lamps)• $10.00/klm in 2010• $ 5.00/klm in 2012• $ 2.00/klm in 2015

• Please compare that to some other technologies now, which should not change much in the future– $0.25 (after upstream rebate) 900 lumen screw-in CFL

• $ 0.28/klm

– $22 for 4 high lumen F32T8s & high performance ballast• $ 2.04/klm

• With LED’s excellent optical control capability, often need less lumens, which reduces cost

Page 19: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

19

HAS THE LIGHTING INDUSTRY EVOLVED?

• Up to 2 years ago, I would have said yes• But the last two years a lot of the LED

marketing literature and sales people, remind me of reflector and CFL marketing literature and sales people in the late 80s to mid 90s– Way too many LED sales people know very little

about lighting and may have been selling cars recently

• Many do not even know what LM79 and LM80 are

Page 20: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

20

TRUTH IN ADVERTISING?• Not only has the DOE CALiPER

Program revealed – Many LED products not meeting

manufacturer specifications

– But also that many fluorescent, incandescent and halogen products have the same problem

Page 21: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

21

TRUTH IN ADVERTISING?• September 8, 2010... The United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has sued

a California-based LED bulb manufacturer and its principals to stop them from exaggerating the light output and life expectancy of its LED bulbs, and misleading consumers.

• In its continuing effort to stop deceptive advertising the FTC filed a complaint charging that since 2008, Lights of America, Inc. has overstated the light output and life expectancy of its LED bulbs on packages and in brochures. The agency also charges that Lights of America misled consumers about how the brightness of its LED bulbs compare to traditional incandescent lights.

• The FTC notes that it authorizes the filing of a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The Commission also points out that a complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have actually violated the law.

• Copies of the Commission’s complaint and the press release <http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/09/lightsofamerica.shtm> about it can be found on the FTC web site.

Page 22: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

22

ARE LEDS REALLY MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY? • Yes, fluorescent, HID and induction have

mercury– But the manufacturers have been doing a very

good job reducing it– Many states require recycling– Many fixtures can be kept for a long time,

because lamps and ballasts can be easily replaced

Page 23: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

23

ARE LEDS REALLY MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY?

• LEDs do not contain any mercury, but– Toxic chemicals used in production– Water in manufacturing wafers/chips– Energy to mine, transport and melt the heavy metal into

bars, which will be used for heat sinks– Energy to melt the metal bars into heat sinks– Energy to transport the heavy fixtures– Energy to ship decommissioned fixtures to recycler– Energy to re-melt the heavy metal heat sinks into bars or

something directly useable after fixtures have been decommissioned

Page 24: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

24

ARE LEDS REALLY MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY? • DOE hired Carnegie Mellon to do a cradle-

to-cradle study to see if LEDs are really more environmentally friendly than incumbents– Who knows when that study will be completed

• Until then…– Please consider hanging up the phone and

kicking out all LED sales people that lay out the marketing hype that LEDs are so much more environmentally friendly

Page 25: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

25

ARE LEDS REALLY MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY? • There is this good study for exterior

fixtures– University of Pittsburgh’s Mascaro Center

for Sustainable Innovation’s ‘Life Cycle Assessment of Streetlight Technologies’• www.ledsmagazine.com/news/7/3/12?cmpid=

EnlLEDsMarch172010

Page 26: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

26

MORE ON ENVIRONMENTAL

• No matter what you specify or buy, RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) compliant is highly recommended– Already mandated in Europe– For example, eliminates lead in solder– Also mercury, cadmium, etc.

Page 27: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

27

RUNNING COOL• Although getting rid of heat can be important for fluorescent

lamps and electronic ballasts, drivers and generators, it is especially important for LEDs

• Make sure that LED products that you are interested in have excellent thermal design, unless they are going in freezers

• Various LED cooling mechanisms are interesting– Relatively thick and heavy metal fins– Thin metal fins, like car radiators without liquid– Fans, like in screw-in or GU24 lamps– ‘Goo’ in loop with hot rising and cool coming back down to LEDs– And others

Page 28: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

28

TROPHY CHIPS• In production runs, there are often some

LED chips that have very high lumens per watt, which can be called trophy chips

• Be cautious of sample fixtures, especially for large projects– If free or directly furnished sample fixture(s)

from a manufacturer look very good, buy one or more samples through a third party and compare performance with original ones

Page 29: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

29

WOW FACTOR• Because LEDs are new and different, they

have the WOW factor much more than most other lighting technologies– But that not necessarily make them better with

regard to performance and cost effectiveness

• Early adopter manufacturers, specifiers, contractors and end-customers are important, but care should be taken not go overboard

Page 30: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

30

HALF & HALF• I need to convince about half of my clients

that good LED products are ready for prime time in specific applications– Such as task lights, recessed can kits,

PAR38s & exterior fixtures

• I need to convince the other half that they should not use LED products in specific applications– Especially LED T8s

Page 31: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

31

PROJECTIONS• We have a lot of good information about lumen

depreciation, life, color consistency, etc. with incumbent technologies– Although not even the first Philips induction systems have

been in exterior night time operation to see if they really last 100,000 hours

• But so much information for LEDs are projections. They may be good projects, but they are still projections– For example if LEDs are only tested for 6,000 hours, will

the extrapolation for 50,000 or more hours really hold up?– Will the brand new LEDs, that have considerably more

lumens and lumens/watt than than previous generation, have at least as good long term lumen maintenance, etc?

Page 32: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

32

LONG TERM FINANCIAL RETURN

• Yes, some LED products look good up to rated life, which may be 50,000 hours

• But what about right after rated life when those fixtures may have to be retrofitted or replaced?

• Recommended to do life cycle or other long term cost effectiveness calculations at longer than rated life, like maybe 150% of rated life– May be expensive with LED products– On the other hand, very easy and inexpensive to relamp

and reballast T8 fixtures decade after decade

Page 33: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

33

DON’T CONSIDER AN LED PRODUCT UNLESS

• LM79 report tested by a DOE or NVLAP approved or CALiPER recognized lab– Not just having the report, the results need to be good

compared to competitive products

• LM80 information– Again, not just having the information, but how good is it– A reminder, lumen maintenance is just one aspect of

luminaire life and reliability

• Also good if Energy Star rated• Also good if on DesignLights Consortium SSL

Qualified Product List

Page 34: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

34

JUST BECAUSE…• Just because one LED fixture manufacturer

states 150,000 hours for rated life, and another LED fixture manufacturer states 75 hours, does necessarily means that the first manufacturer is better– Maybe the second manufacturer is just more

conservative and realistic

Page 35: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

35

WHICH COMPANIES TO BUY FROM

• I have seen very good LED and other technology products from manufacturers that I have never of before, many off shore– But I have not specified any of these products

• Only feel comfortable specifying LED and other new technology products from manufacturers, which have– Long enough track record, so have already learned by school of

hard knocks• For example, surge protection

– Deep pockets or 3rd party insurance policy so can handle any

potential large scale warranty problems

Page 36: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

36

WARRANTY• Although standard warranty for exterior LED

fixtures is 5 years– Usually can get a 10 year warranty by spending

an extra 10% initially, which is usually a good deal, especially with the projections issues previously discussed

• How credible is a 10 year or even a much shorter warranty from an induction or LED product manufacturer, which has only been in business for 1 or 2 years?

Page 37: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

37

DOWN THE ROAD WITH LED PRODUCTS THAT ARE INSTALLED

• If hard-wired LED products are purchased now, after warranty will manufacturer have replacement LED assemblies, drivers, etc?– If not that much light is needed, I have been

specifying new recessed cans with screw-in or GU-24 bases and go with LED PAR38s, which end-customers will be able to easily get and install

Page 38: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

38

FOR LED TO REALLY BECOME MAINSTREAM

• Pricing to continue to come down• Replaceable and interchangeable LED and driver

modules from several manufacturers– Some manufacturers have already started this– www.zhagastandard.org

• Constant lumens– 30% lumen drop from initial to end of life is either too

much light initially so enough light at end of life or good amount of light initially, which would be too little light at end of rated life

– Several manufacturers are already doing this

Page 39: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

39

RETROFIT OR REPLACE

LED FIXTURES• Some exterior LED fixtures have modular LED bars– So maybe in as few as 3 or 5 years when LEDs are so

much better than now, maybe could retrofit a 4 bar fixture with 3 new bars, reducing wattage by 25%, and in another 3 or 5 years, go down to 2 new bars

• Some other exterior LED fixture manufacturers think that in 3, 5 or 10 years there will be an entire different form factor, so fixtures should be replaced– Hopefully these fixture manufacturers will pay shipping

costs so the valuable heat sink metal will be recycled and provide a discount on replacement fixtures for customers that originally bought from them

Page 40: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

40

MAINTENANCE• Maintenance people normally replace lamps when

they burn out– Even if much more cost effective in most applications,

there is so little group relamping across the continent

• LEDs are like mercury vapor, which generally just get dimmer and dimmer– I have seen 1000W mercury vapor hibays that only

provide 5 footcandles, when much more is required, but so many maintenance point at the hibay, say it is still working and move on

Page 41: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

41

MAINTENANCE• There are already millions of first generation LED exit signs

that still work, but no longer provide sufficient light for NFPA and/or city codes– Most maintenance people do not want to retrofit or replace them,

because they are still working– But with a fire or another emergency, this could lead to injury, death

and big time lawsuits

• With the transition to LEDs in most applications, there will have to be major education and motivation to retrofit or replace LED fixtures, when lose 30% of initial lumens– Maybe do yearly light level tests– Maybe get fixtures that have an internal timers or photocontrols that

flash the major LEDs or a test LED– Maybe budget years in advance for retrofit or replacement costs

Page 42: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

42

ESPECIALLY FOR EXTERIOR• Since LED fixtures can provide sufficient light

between fixtures and to designated perimeters without having excessive blob of light underneath, why continue with average footcandles?

• With LED’s rapid and significant performance and pricing improvements will induction, which is a mature technology, become obsolete very soon for most applications?

Page 43: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

43

BUY NOW OR LATER• Since LEDs are getting so much better and lower

cost should you replace now or wait?– Jim Brodrick’s computer analogy– When will it not be the best solution to retrofit T12s and

basic grade T8s with high performance fluorescent T8 systems or go with new LED troffers instead of high performance fluorescent T8 troffers?

• Interim solutions– There are numerous applications that LEDs may not be

that cost effective yet, but should be in a year or few– For example, if have standard halogen PAR lamps now,

could switch to halogen infrared versions now, and when they burn out, go to LED

Page 44: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

44

CONTENDERS

Page 45: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

45

CONTENDERS• LED

– Latest generation of chips and products

• T8s (fluorescent, not LED ones)– High performance 32W F32T8 lamps & ballasts as

approved by Consortium of Energy Efficiency, www.cee1.org

– With ballast, these lamps are more efficacious than reduced wattage T8s, which have less lumens

– There are also extra long life T8s with up to 55,000 rated hours, which is longer than projected rated lives of LED T8s

Page 46: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

46

CONTENDERS• Reduced wattage T5s

– 26W F28T5 lamps and high performance ballasts– Same lumens as high lumen full wattage lamps

• Reduced wattage T5HOs– 49W F54T5HO lamps and high performance ballasts

• Similar to 50 and 51W lamps that same lumens as full wattage lamps

– In general with fluorescents when go from standard to high output, lumens go up, but lumens/watt go down

• I have not specified any T5HO systems in over 10 years

• (Comparing T8s with T5s and T5HOs)– With larger optical compartments, fixture efficiency can be just as good

with T8s than with the smaller diameter lamps– There are numerous BF ballasts to choose from with T8s, which are

not available with the smaller diameter lamps– If want to maintain US and North American jobs, better to go with T8

lamps, because most T5 and T5HO lamps are manufactured overseas

Page 47: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

47

CONTENDERS• HID

– Mainly ceramic metal halide (CMH) with electronic ballast• Long warm up and restrike times

– HPS will be included for some exterior applications

• Induction– Only Philips and Sylvania included, because decent chance of long

term replacement parts and warranty support– In general, days of induction will be limited with rapid LED

improvements and price reductions– Realistic system rated life is 60,000 - 70,000 hours before

significant maintenance will be required– Lamps are so large, so really need a kitchen sink size fixture for

any decent optical control

Page 48: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

48

CONTENDERS• Plasma

– Mainly Luxim, www.luxim.com, which can call it LEP for light emitting plasma

– There are other manufacturers as well

• Halogen infrared PAR and MR16 lamps– From big three lamp manufacturers and others– Really not that efficacious, but since relatively inexpensive, can be

a good interim solution

• In niche applications, sources like CFLs, neon, etc. could be considered, but they are not included in this presentation

Page 49: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

49

LETS GET DOWN TO SOME

GENERAL COMPARISONS

LETS GET DOWN TO SOME

GENERAL COMPARISONS

Page 50: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

50

LIGHTPER WATT

Page 51: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

51

LUMENS PER WATT• LED

– 6000K typically has about • 10 - 20% more lumens per watt than 4000K• 20 - 25% more lumens per watt than 3500K

– For exterior applications that lower CRI is okay 4000K chips can have about the same lumens per watt has higher CRI 6000K chips

– Most ‘white’ LEDs are really blue LEDs with similar phosphors that fluorescents use

• The less that the spectrum has to be shifted to a lower CCT from 6000K, the more efficient the blue/phosphor conversion

• But 6000K will typically not work in interior applications

Page 52: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

52

LUMENS PER WATT• LED

– Developments are being made with lower Kelvin LEDs getting closer to the efficacy of 6000K

– LEDs from some manufacturers may have lower lumens and lumens per watt at optimal temperature, but better performance at higher temperatures

Page 53: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

53

lampamplifier, ballast, driver, generator

initial system lumens per watt

high performance fixture efficiency

initial fixture lumens per watt

latest generation LED electronic driver 40 - 130

320W CMH electronic ballast 110 85 94

high performance 32W F32T8

high performance electronic ballast

100 87 87

26W F28T5high performance electronic ballast

100 87 87

49W F54T5HOhigh performance electronic ballast

95 87 83

185W plasma lamp electronic amplifier 84 90 76

150W induction electronic generator 77 75 58

60W PAR38 halogen infrared

none 19 100 19

INITIAL LUMENS PER WATT COMPARISON

Above numbers are not exact and may change. Plus there are temperature issues and so many fixture types.

Page 54: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

54

Although some chips have better LPW without heat losses, other chips perform better in real life applications

CHIP FIXTURE

WITHOUT DRIVER OR TEMPERATURE

LOSSES

(UP TO) AT STEADY STATE TEMPERATURE INCLUDING FIXTURE

EFFICIENCY

PAST 70 402009 100 702010 120-130 90-1002011 150- 160 120-130

LED APPROXIMATE LUMENS PER WATT

TIME FRAME

Page 55: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

55

Page 56: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

56

Page 57: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

57

FOOTCANDLES PER WATT

• Footcandles per watt is probably better than lumens per watt, especially for most LED products and halogen infrared spots– Will show street lighting comparison example

later

Page 58: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

58

RATED LIFE

Page 59: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

59

product rated life in hours notes

interior LED lamp or fixture, including driver, etc.

25,000 - 50,000Really depends on thermals. Some products have a shorter life if recessed compared to open

exterior LED fixture, including driver, etc.

50,000 - 100,00060,000 - 75,000 hours is a good target. Will drivers, etc. really last longer than 60,000 hours?

induction lamp & electronic generator 60,000 - 70,000There is more to it than just the 100,000 hour rating in lamp catalogs.

CMH lamp (driven by electronic ballast)

10,000 - 30,000Lower wattage lamps tend to have shorter lives. Some electronic ballasts can substantially increase lamp life.

highest-lumen long-life T8 lamp (driven by electronic program start ballast)

30,000 - 40,000 36,000 - 42,000

Shorter range is 3 hour cycles. Longer range is 12 hour cycles.

mid-lumen extra-long-life T8 lamp (driven by electronic program start ballast)

40,000 - 52,000 46,000 - 55,000

Shorter range is 3 hour cycles. Longer range is 12 hour cycles.

T5 lamp (driven by electronic program start ballast)

25,000 - 30,000 30,000 - 40,000

Shorter range is 3 hour cycles. Longer range is 12 hour cycles.

T5HO lamp (driven by electronic program start ballast)

25,000 - 45,000 30,000 - 60,000

Shorter range is 3 hour cycles. Longer range is 12 hour cycles.

plasma lamp (driven by electronic amplifier)

50,000 Amplifier life may need further research.

halogen infrared PAR lamp 3,000 - 6,000One way for long life is to use 130V lamp @ 120V, which also reduces light output.

electronic ballasts in general 60,000 Longer if run cool and shorter if run hot.

RATED LIFE COMPARISON

Rated lives may be slightly different for certain products from certain manufacturers.

Page 60: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

60

RATED LIFE• Exterior LED fixtures are typically rated longer than

interior LED fixtures, because can usually have more heat sinks and are run at night, which is cooler than in most conditioned buildings

• For exterior fixtures, usually good to use 50,000 - 75,000 hours when comparing LED and induction– That is 12 - 18 years at all night burns

• How long will exterior fixtures really last with wind, rain, snow, lightning strikes, etc?

• Heat is enemy of all electronics, including ballasts, generators, drivers and amplifiers

Page 61: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

61

END OF LIFE LUMEN

MAINTENANCE

Page 62: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

62

productpercent of initial

lumensnotes

LED 70%Without any constant lumen mechanism, either too bright initially or too dim at end of life.

induction lamp 63 - 70%This is based on 100,000 hours. Even at 60,000 - 70,000 hours, without any constant lumen mechanism, either too bright initially or to dim at end.

CMH lamp 80%Probe start MH lamps with magnetic ballasting can have down to 45%.

highest-lumen long-life T8 lamp 92%

mid-lumen extra-long-life T8 lamp 91%

T5 lamp 92%

T5HO lamp 89%

plasma lamp ?

halogen infrared PAR lamp 95 - 100%

END OF LIFE LUMEN MAINTENANCE COMPARISON

Numbers can vary with various wattages from various manufacturers.

Page 63: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

63FROM FINELITE

Page 64: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

64

END OF LIFE LUMEN MAINTENANCE

• Although mean or design lumens, which is at 40% of rate life, is often used with incumbent technologies– End of life is often better

• For example, make sure sufficient light in a hibay at end of a rack aisle right before MH lamp burns out

Page 65: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

65

COLOR RENDERING

Page 66: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

66

product CRI notes

halogen infrared PAR 100

800 series fluorescent 80 - 85

induction 80

LED 70 - 92+ Sometimes can get more lumens with lower CRI.

CMH 70 - 95 Sometimes can get more lumens with lower CRI.

plasma 72 - 94 Higher lumens with lower CRI.

COLOR RENDERING INDEX COMPARISON

Numbers can vary with various wattages from various manufacturers.

Page 67: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

67

COLOR RENDERING• CRI (Color Rendering Index)

– Based on how ‘natural’ pastel or unsaturated colors look with various light sources

– Works fairly well for all incumbent light sources

Page 68: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

68

COLOR RENDERING• Although LEDs do not always do well with pastel

colors, they often do very well with bright or saturated colors– Often people think that LEDs with lower CRI make bright

colors look more natural than other light sources that have higher CRI

– So do not automatically think that lower CRI LEDs are inferior

– But there are numerous LED products with 90+ CRI, which is excellent

• There is work going to replace CRI with another color matrix that will include both pastel/unsaturated and bright/saturated colors

Page 69: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

69

KELVIN

Page 70: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

70

KELVIN• With LEDs Kelvin and lumens are usually related

– Most common way to get white light is using a blue LED with phosphor similar to the the phosphor used in fluorescents

• More that high Kelvin bluish light has to be transformed to lower Kelvin, more light is lost

• Fluorescents and induction lumens do not drop off with at low Kelvin and may drop off slightly at high Kelvin

• CMH, halogen and some other light sources pretty much have fixed Kelvin

Page 71: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

71

KELVIN• High Kelvin, like 4000 - 6000K LEDs may be okay

for exterior applications, but 3000 - 3500K Kelvin LEDs work best in interior applications

• Don’t know exactly why but lower Kelvin LEDs seem to match higher Kelvin fluorescent– For example, 3500K LED task lights look very good with

5000K fluorescent ambient lights in offices

Page 72: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

72

LONG TERM COLOR

CONSISTENCY

Page 73: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

73

LONG TERM COLOR CONSISTENCY• LED

– There are three common ways to get white light• As previously discussed, most common is white LED,

which is really blue LED and yellow phosphor• Blue and/or other LEDs with remote phosphor

– Phosphor is subjected to less heat, so degrades more slowly

– Easier to match color among units because individual LED light (which can vary) is correctly mixed in one optical chamber

– Can also add other LED colors to fill out spectrum

• RGB (red, green and blue LEDs)– Reverse rainbow

Page 74: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

74

LONG TERM COLOR CONSISTENCY• LED

– All can have color shift over time• Wavelength of blue LEDs can change over time and the

phosphor can change as it ages and gets baked in its own way• Various color LEDs have different lumen maintenance curves,

so if there no feedback loop with dimming drivers, color can easily shift

– With being so new, we have not really seen the potential full impact of LEDs changing colors over time

– This could be an issue down the road in spaces with new and older LED fixtures or replacement lamps

– Cree’s TrueWhite system has a feedback loop with yellow and red LEDs

Page 75: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

75

LONG TERM COLOR CONSISTENCY

• Fluorescent and other incumbents typically have very stable color from initial to end of life

Page 76: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

76

DIMMING

Page 77: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

77

DIMMING• LED

– LED chips dim quite well– But not all LED fixtures or replacement lamps are

designed to dim• DOE has found that

– Some LED products, which are listed to dim, do not dim well with some or most dimmers

– Some LED products, which are not listed to dim, do dim well with some or most dimmers

– Some LED products list approved incandescent dimmers– Since LEDs can get more efficient when they dim,

because they run cooler when dimmed, LEDs will probably be the future of dimming

• But may really need dedicated dimmers that provide full power to the driver instead of incandescent type dimmers

Page 78: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

78

DIMMING• Fluorescent

– Fluorescents with dimming ballasts can dim, but• Lumens per watt gets worse, because the more

dimming, the more power has to go to heating the cathodes of the lamps

• Dimming ballasts are expensive

– CFLs have some special characteristics• Dedicated dimmable screw-ins usually cannot dim

below 20%• CFLs turn grayish or bluish when dimmed, which is

opposite of our cave man (or cave woman) heritage

Page 79: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

79

DIMMING• Halogen

– Can dim very easy and well

• CMH– Can dim quite well with electronic ballast

• But only down to about 50% before turning green

– Since no lamp cathode heating, can be more efficient than fluorescent dimming

• Induction– Philips may introduce a dimming generator soon– Sylvania may come out with a bilevel generator

• Plasma– Can dim quite well down to 20% with electronic digital

amplifier

Page 80: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

80

NOW SOME

SPECIFICINTERIOR

COMPARISONS

NOW SOME

SPECIFICINTERIOR

COMPARISONS

Page 81: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

81

LINEAR REPLACEMENT

LAMPS

Page 82: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

82

LED T8s• These are listed first, because so important• There are hordes of sales people trying to

sell these, because of potential huge volume and profit– Often Pinocchio-nose marketing hype

• But the DOE has not tested one yet is nearly as good as high performance fluorescent T8s with high performance ballasts

• Lamp cost can often range from $40 to $150 with proposed up to 50,000 hour realistic life

Page 83: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

83

LED T8s• How they are connected

– Some use existing fluorescent ballast, which consumes extra wattage, and the ballast would have to be replaced when it burns out

• Ballasts typically have 60,000 hour rated life

– Some have internal driver, which requires removing existing fluorescent ballast and rewiring to lamp holders

• May void UL listing of fixture

– Some come with their external drivers

Page 84: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

84

LED T8s• DOE documents

– Performance of T12 and T8 Fluorescent lamps and LED Linear Replacement Lamps

• January 2009 Benchmark Report

• Includes that since LED T8s mainly shine light down, so between fixtures and walls can be quite dark

– CALIPER Round 9 & 11– LED Performance Specification Series: T8 Replacement Lamps

• Asking Manufacturers for at least 2,700 lumens– That would require them to be 2 to 3 times more efficient than existing while

keeping their existing 15 - 20 watts

• April 2010

• http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ssl/t8_replacement-lamps.pdf

Page 85: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

85

LED T8s• LEDs often do not do that well taking the shapes of

other technology lamps– Difficulty with distribution, heat sinks, etc.

• What looks really ugly– In parabolic troffers

Page 86: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

86

FLUORESCENT T8s• Since many rebate programs require what

are called high performance, super or 3rd generation T8s and what are called basic grade or 1st generation T8s will not be allowed to sold in 2012, we will just focus on the good ones– Highest lumen long life

• www.cee1.org

– Extra long life mid lumen

Page 87: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

87

3 HR 12 HR 3 HR 12 HR

1st GENERATION - GENERIC 32 2800 75-78 2800 75-781.7 - <10

15,000 - 24,000

20,000 - 30,000

20,000 - 30,000

24,000 - 36,000

2nd GENERATION - GENERIC

32 2950 81-852800 - 2950

80-851.7 - <10

15,000 - 24,000

20,000 - 30,000

20,000 - 30,000

24,000 - 36,000

GE HL 32 3100 82 3000 80 3.95 25,000 36,000 36,000 42,000GE SXL 32 2850 81+ 2750 80 3.95 31,000 40,000 40,000 46,000PHILIPS ADV 32 3100 85 3100 82 1.7 24,000 30,000 30,000 36,000PHILIPS PLUS 32 2950 85 2850 82 1.7 30,000 36,000 36,000 42,000PHILIPS ADV XLL 32 2950 85 2850 82 1.7 36,000 40,000 40,000 46,000SYLVANIA XP 32 3000 85 2850 85 2.9 24,000 40,000 40,000 42,000SYLVANIA XPS 32 3100 85 3100 81 2.9 24,000 40,000 40,000 42,000SYLVANIA XP/XL 32 2950 85 2900 80 3.5 36,000 50,000 52,000 55,000GE SPX 28W 28 2725 82 2625 80 3.95 24,000 30,000 36,000 42,000PHILIPS ADV 28W 28 2725 85 2675 82 1.7 24,000 30,000 30,000 36,000SYLVANIA XP 28W 28 2725 85 2650 80 2.9 24,000 40,000 40,000 42,000SYLVANIA XP XL 28W 28 2600 85 2600 80 3.5 36,000 50,000 52,000 55,000GE SPX 25W 25 2400 85 2350 80 3.95 36,000 40,000 40,000 46,000PHILIPS ADV 25W 25 2500 85 2400 85 1.7 24,000 30,000 30,000 36,000PHILIPS ADV XLL 25W 25 2400 85 2350 82 1.7 36,000 40,000 40,000 46,000SYLVANIA XP 25W 25 2475 85 2400 80 2.9 24,000 40,000 40,000 42,000SYLVANIA XP XL 25W 25 2475 85 2400 80 3.5 36,000 50,000 52,000 55,000

F28T5 25-28 2900+ 85 2750+ 851.4 - 2.5

* *20,000 - 30,000

25,000 - 40,000

F54T5HO 49-54 5000 85 4800+ 851.4 - 2.5

* *20,000 - 45,000

25,000 - 60,000

Lamp manufacturers may alter rated lamp life and lumen specifications, so get updates from manufacturers.Prepared by Stan Walercyk of Lighing Wizards 1/1/11 version. www.lightingwizards.com

CATALOG LUMENS

CRI

MAX MG

OF HG

4' T8 LAMP LIFE, LUMENS, CRI & MERCURY

INSTANT START PROGRAM STARTLAMP WATTS3000-4100K

CATALOG LUMENS

CRI

5000K LAMP LIFE HOURS

Page 88: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

88

4' lamp type

initial catalog or photopic

lamp lumens

lamp watts

lamp lumens

per lamp watts

lamp quant

ballast type

standard ballast factor

system watts

initial system lumens

initial system lumens per watt

mean or 8000 hour

lumen maint- enance

mean or 8000 hour

system lumens

mean or 8000 hour

system lumens per

watt

3100 32 96.9 2 EE IS 0.87 53 5394 101.8 95% 5124 96.73100 32 96.9 2 EE PS 1.15 70 7130 101.9 95% 6774 96.83100 32 96.9 2 G IS 0.87 58 5394 93.0 95% 5124 88.42950 32 92.2 2 EE IS 0.87 53 5133 96.8 95% 4876 92.02950 32 92.2 2 G IS 0.87 58 5133 88.5 95% 4876 84.12800 32 87.5 2 EE IS 0.87 53 4872 91.9 95% 4628 87.32800 32 87.5 2 G IS 0.87 58 4872 84.0 95% 4628 79.82850 30 95.0 2 EE IS 0.87 51 4959 97.2 95% 4711 92.42850 30 95.0 2 G IS 0.87 55 4959 90.2 95% 4711 85.72750 28 98.2 2 EE IS 0.87 48 4785 99.7 95% 4546 94.72750 28 98.2 2 G IS 0.87 51 4785 93.8 95% 4546 89.12440 25 97.6 2 EE IS 0.87 42 4246 101.1 95% 4033 96.02440 25 97.6 2 G IS 0.87 47 4246 90.3 95% 4033 85.82400 25 96.0 2 EE IS 0.87 42 4176 99.4 95% 3967 94.52400 25 96.0 2 G IS 0.87 47 4176 88.9 95% 3967 84.4

high lumen F28T5 3050 28 108.9 2 EE PS 0.95 58 5795 99.9 93% 5389 92.9typical F28T5 2900 28 103.6 2 PS 1.00 64 5800 90.6 93% 5394 84.326W F28T5 2900 26 111.5 2 EE PS 0.95 55 5510 100.2 92% 5069 92.226W high lumen F28T5 3050 26 117.3 2 EE PS 1.15 67 7015 104.7 92% 6454 96.351W F54T5HO 5000 51 98.0 2 EE PS 1.00 108 10000 92.6 92% 9200 85.2typical F54T5HO 5000 54 92.6 2 PS 1.00 117 10000 85.5 93% 9300 79.5F34T12 800 3100 34 91.2 2 RS E 0.85 60 5270 87.8 93% 4901 81.7F34T12 CW 2650 34 77.9 2 RS M 0.88 72 4664 64.8 87% 4058 56.4

4' LINEAR FLUORESCENT EFFICACY TABLE

notes: Lumens, lumen maintenance, ballast factors and wattages may vary among various manufacturers.

high performance F32T8

extra long life 2950 lumen F32T8

basic grade F32T8

30W F32T8

28W F32T8

25W F32T8

Prepared by Stan Walerczyk of Lighting Wizards www.lightingwizards.com 11/11/09 version

extra long life 25W F32T8

93% is used as an average EOL lumen maintenance for T5HOs. 90% - 94% range among manufacturers.All wattages based on 277V. EE IS is extra efficient instant start. G IS is generic instant start. EE PS is extra efficient program start. PS is program start. RS E is rapis start electronic. RS M is rapid start magnetic.Extra long life is 36,000 hours with IS and 40,000 hours with PS ballasts at 3 hour cycles.

In enclosed fixtures, since reduced wattage F32T8s consume less heat they can often operate closer to optimal 77 degrees F temperature, so may provide more light than this table shows compared to full wattage.Although efficacy can be improved with IS and RS ballasts with T5s and T5HOs, lamp life can be greatly reduced and lamp manufacturers may not warranty lamps.

Page 89: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

89

FLUORESCENT T8s• Some LED marketing literature and sales people try to make

fluorescent T8s look bad, like– Stating that T8s only last 15,000 or even just 10,000 hours

• It is true that rated life for fluorescents, HID, incandescents and halogen is when half of the lamps have burned out and half are still working in laboratory conditions– Small percentage of lamps may only last a few months– Small percentage of lamps may last over a decade– Large majority of T8 lamps will last at least 80% of rated life when not

turned on and off too much• For example, most 42,000 hour rated T8 lamps will last at least 33,600 hours

when not turned on and off too much

• GE, Philips and Sylvania do a good job policing each other on lumen and life ratings

Page 90: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

90

FLUORESCENT T8s• Starting is the hardest on fluorescent lamps

– Lamp life can really get short with instant start ballasts and occupancy sensors that turn on and off the lights more than 4 times per day on average

– Program start ballasts really help lamp life when lamps are cycled on and off a lot

• When I go over the pros and cons of instant and program start ballasts with T8s, over half of my clients select parallel wired program start ballasts

• So the next time you see LED literature or hear an LED sales person stating that good fluorescent T8 lamps last less than 20,000 hours, you could– Throw away the LED marketing literature– Delete the LED file in your computer– Hang up on the LED sales person– Tell the LED sales person to leave

Page 91: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

91

LED vs. FLUORESCENT T8s$0.15 3500 1.1 $0.05 15

notes

type wattsannual

elect. cost

lamp life @ 12 hour

cycles

end of life lamp lumens

end of life lamp lumens

lamp life @ 12 hour

cycles

watts watt

reduc- tion

annual elect.

savingsincen- tive

appr. installed

cost

pay- back (yrs)

compre- hensive

long term benefit

4480 50,000 68 76 $43.89 $13.30 $220.00 4.7 $714.99may not be sufficient light long term

5077 40,000 58 86 $49.67 $15.05 $55.00 0.8 $1,077.51

probably sufficient light with better thermals & fixture efficiency

5428 55,000 65 79 $45.62 $13.83 $57.00 0.9 $1,051.77

probably sufficient light with better thermals & fixture efficiency

5077 40,000 58 86 $49.67 $15.05 $65.00 1.0 $1,067.51reflector may increase light levels

5428 55,000 65 79 $45.62 $13.83 $67.00 1.2 $1,041.77reflector may increase light levels

4 1600 lumen 17W LED T8s

/KWH saved incentive

Copyright of Stan Walerczyk, LC, principal of Lighting Wizards. January 1, 2011 version.

2x4 lensed troffer with 4 F34T12CWs

4 F34T12 CW lamps, 2 2-lamp energy saving magnetic ballasts, angled sides with good white paint & clear prismatic lens

blended rate cumulative years in long term benefit

proposed

retrofit and relamping options

144

footnotes: Numbers in colored boxes can be changed, which automatically alters computations.

annual hours

6500

2 3100 lumen long life 32W fluorescent F32T8s, 2-lamp .89 BF high performace parallel wired program start ballast & white reflector

2 2950 lumen extra long life 32W fluorescent F32T8s in outboard lamp holders & 2-lamp 1.00 BF high performace parallel wired program start ballast

reduced AC savings x

existing

2 2950 lumen long life 32W fluorescent F32T8s, 2-lamp 1.00 BF high performace parallel wired program start ballast & white reflector

25,000

2 3100 lumen long life 32W fluorescent F32T8s in outboard lamp holders & 2-lamp .89 BF high performace parallel wired program start ballast

$75.60

Page 92: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

92

LED vs. FLUORESCENT T8s$0.15 3500 1.1 $0.05 15

notes

type wattsannual

elect. cost

lamp life @ 3 hour

cycles

end of life lamp lumens

end of life lamp lumens

lamp life @ 3 hour

cycleswatts

watt reduc-

tion

annual elect.

savingsincen- tive

appr. installed

cost

pay- back (yrs)

compre- hensive

long term benefit

3360 50,000 51 38 $21.95 $6.65 $165.00 7.2 $269.58probably not sufficient long term light

5077 36,000 58 31 $17.90 $5.43 $55.00 2.8 $326.38

sufficient light with better thermals & fixture efficiency

4831 52,000 58 31 $17.90 $5.43 $57.00 2.9 $351.23

probably sufficient light with better thermals & fixture efficiency

4050 36,000 46 43 $24.83 $7.53 $65.00 2.3 $464.01reflector may allow sufficient light

4831 52,000 58 31 $17.90 $5.43 $67.00 3.4 $341.23reflector probably allow sufficient light

2x4 lensed troffer with 3 basic grade F32T8s

3 basic grade F32T8s, generic 3-lamp .88 BF electronic instant start ballast, angled sides with good white paint & clear prismatic lens

blended rate cumulative years in long term benefit

proposed

retrofit and relamping options

89

annual hours /KWH saved incentivereduced AC savings x

existing

2 3100 lumen long life 32W fluorescent F32T8s in outboard lamp holders & 2-lamp .89 BF high performace parallel wired program start ballast

$46.73

Copyright of Stan Walerczyk, LC, principal of Lighting Wizards. January 1, 2011 version.footnotes: Numbers in colored boxes can be changed, which automatically alters computations.

2 2950 lumen extra long life 32W fluorescent F32T8s in outboard lamp holders & 2-lamp .89 BF high performace parallel wired program start ballast

2 2950 lumen long life 32W fluorescent F32T8s, 2-lamp .89 BF high performace parallel wired program start ballast & white reflector

20,000 6650

2 3100 lumen long life 32W fluorescent F32T8s, 2-lamp .71 BF high performace parallel wired program start ballast & white reflector

3 1600 lumen 17W LED T8s

Page 93: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

93

MAYBE SOMETHING

BETTER THAN LED T8s

Page 94: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

94

MAYBE SOMETHING BETTER THAN LED T8s

• Kits for troffers, etc– 2’ and 4’ long and about 1 - 2 inches wide LED bars

• Screwed into fixture, using fixture as a heat sink

– If external driver, mount it in ballast compartment

• Something like Albeo’s troffer conversion kit– Google search ‘Albeo youtube’ for installation video

• Something like the LED bars and driver using in the new Lithonia RT LED troffers– www.lithonia.com/rtled

Page 95: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

95

DECORATIVE

Page 96: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

96

DECORATIVE• Christmas/decorative lights

– LED versions are becoming a no brainer

• Small lamps in chandeliers– Usually sparkle is important, and the amount of light is not critical– Although there are decorative shaped CFLs with small bases, which

last much longer than incandescents, with white phosphor - No Sparkle

– There are decorative LEDs available with small bases that have long life and sparkle

• When getting these types of LED lights– Get ones with good warranties– Especially from big box stores. check with them if they require lumen

maintenance tests before they carry certain products

Page 97: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

97

OMNI DIRECTIONAL

(FANCY NAME FOR SOMETHING LIKE AN A19)

Page 98: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

98

LED• Getting better all of the time, but still not

really cost effective to replace CFLs

• But when there is at least one winner of the L Prize in this category, they should be ready for prime time– Philips has made an entry– Others will too– There can be up 4 winners in each category

Page 99: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

99

CFLs• Although some people give CFLs a bad wrap,

CFLs are quite good in many applications– Screw-ins can often cost $.25 with upstream rebates– Lumens per watt are quite good– CRI is quite good, typically in the 80s– Life is much longer than incandescents– Mercury is really not that much of an issue

• Although quite good, there are some drawbacks, and maybe best to consider a temporary solution– Until LEDs or something else becomes ready for prime

time

Page 100: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

100

ACCENTLIGHTING

Page 101: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

101

LED ACCENT LIGHTS• Sparkle and Focus

– LED accent lights can provide sparkle and focus like reflector PAR lamps, which CFL reflector lamps can’t

• Cool– Since LEDs do not emit any heat from the light

side, they can be very good lighting flowers, produce, etc. without damaging them

Page 102: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

102

LED MR16s• Best LED MR16s that DOE has tested so far can only

replace up to 20W halogen MR16– MR16s are on the small side for higher wattage LEDs to be able to

dissipate sufficient heat– Most halogen MR16s are 50W standard or 35 - 37W infrared– Existing LED MR16s may work fine in

• Overlit applications

• Elevators, which are often overlit

• Some aesthetic applications, where light levels not that important

• Check if existing and new step down transformers will work with LED MR16s, because LED MR16s are such low wattage and will not activate step down transformers

Page 103: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

103

HALOGEN MR16s• If existing are standard halogen

– Can switch to lower wattage halogen infrareds• For example, 50W to 35 - 37W

• If existing are halogen infrareds– Maybe keep for 1- 2 years

• LED MR16s should be cost effective for many applications in 1 - 2 years

Page 104: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

104

LED R or PAR 20, 30 & 38

• The larger the lamp, the easier it is to dissipate heat

• If can use larger lamp, go with it• Some retail chain stores have already

started switching to good LED reflector lamps

• For more general recessed can applications, need wider beam spread options from most manufacturers

Page 105: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

105

LED R or PAR 20, 30 & 38• There are numerous good products, including

Cree’s LRP38 with indirect lighting on left and Solais LR38 with fan on right

Page 106: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

106

LED R or PAR 20, 30 & 38• MSI iPAR-38 looks very interesting

– Three wattage lumen settings • 10W with 550 lumens• 12W with 650 lumens• 16W with 800 lumens

– Proprietary Intelligent Communication• Type of bar code reader can provide

– Manufacturing info– Installation info– Hours of use– Wattage setting

Page 107: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

107

LED R or PAR 20, 30 & 38• GE and others even have wet location ones

Page 108: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

108

LED R or PAR 20, 30 & 38• LED R or PAR38s will really be ready for prime

time after there is at least one winner of the L Prize in this category– Last time I checked there were no submittals

Page 109: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

109

LED MODULAR EXAMPLE

Page 110: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

110

HALOGEN PAR 20, 30 & 38

• Just like MR16s, there are halogen infrared PAR lamps– Which can save 10 - 20 watts compared to

standard halogens

• If standard halogens now, maybe go with halogen infrared now and wait 1 - 2 years to go with LEDs

Page 111: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

111

CMH ACCENT LIGHTS• Ceramic Metal Halide with electronic ballasting have

– Can provide sparkle and focus– Excellent CRI– Quite good lumens per watt– Reasonable long life

• Available as– Small omni directional lamps which can go into fixtures

with reflectors– PAR lamps– PAR lamps with integral electronic ballasts

• GE, Philips and Sylvania have 23 - 25 watt PAR38s with 10,000+ hour rated life

Page 112: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

112

RECESSED CANS

Page 113: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

113

LED• Recessed cans for residential and

commercial are a great application for LEDs– Majority of ENERGY STAR LED products are

recessed cans

• Several of my clients are nervous about getting new LED recessed can fixtures– Because, potential problems of getting

replacement matching LED modules and drivers down the road

– And prefer getting some kind of solution that is easily replaceable from several manufacturers

Page 114: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

114

LED• LED PAR lamp

– There are a number of these available with screw-in or GU12 base– If existing is 277V, can use step down transformer or try to find a

277V lamp– Can use pole changer, which is very helpful for many application

• Recessed can kits with integral LEDs– Probably most of you already know about this type of kit from Cree

and others

• Recessed can kits with GU24 bases for various manufacturers’ LED PAR lamps– Delray may be first manufacturer of these– Trim ring– Customer can select preferred LED PAR lamp– Can use pole changer

Page 115: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

115

CFL• CFLs are reasonably efficacious, but

– Not nearly efficacious as high performance T8 systems– Most are only rated for 10,000 - 12,000 hours– Many recessed can fixtures for them have very bad fixture

efficiency• Like 50 - 60%

• But there are some CFL recessed cans with more like 75% fixture efficiency

• Sometimes screw-in reflector CFLs are good solutions• Usually best to try to

– Have just one lamp per fixture– Minimize lamp types

Page 116: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

116

REACH-IN FRIG/FREEZER

Page 117: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

117

LED• Since this is a limited application, will only briefly

discuss– Walmart and other retail chains have already cost

effectively retrofitted or installed in stores– Since no heat on light side, can also reduce cooling load– Many very good products with and without on/off, staged

or continuous occupancy sensors, which can save considerable

• Some organizations have done a lot of work making specifications for rebates, for example

– www.smud.org

– www.pge.com

Page 118: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

118

FLUORESCENT• Majority of 5’ lamps, which are low volume and

relatively expensive• If have T12, definitely do something• Many existing T8s systems do not have the best

lamps or the best ballasts• High performance T8 lamp and ballast systems can

often save 20% wattage compared to generic T8 systems, which will also reduce cooling load– In many applications could go with a bilevel system

controlled by an occupancy sensor

• Before jumping into LEDs, good to ‘raise the bar’ and see if they are cost effective compared to high performance T8 systems

Page 119: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

119

TROFFERS

Page 120: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

120

LED• Already some good LED troffers from major manufacturers • Can have over 100 lumens per watt

– Which is better than any fluorescent troffer

• May cost $300 - $350 now– But I have specifying them for some high profile conference rooms

for clients that want dimming and ‘high tech’ lighting– Expect to become cost effective with high performance fluorescent

troffers in general applications in about 2 years• Depending on design and application, some models may be

glary • With control systems can have constant lumens so not

overlit to begin with or too little light at end of life• Being able to replace LEDs and drivers from below without

having to lift ceiling tiles could really save maintenance labor down the road

Page 121: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

121

LEDCree LR24

Lithonia RT LED

Page 122: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

122

T8 FLUORESCENT• There is a new generation of high performance 2x4 1F32T8

troffers that can be installed in typical 8x10 spacing– Depending on BF and if instant or program start extra efficient ballast,

wattage can range from 24 - 39 with direct relationship to lumens– $100 - $150 pricing with high performance ballasts

• Interesting that in CALiPER Round 11, one of these was only measured with 71 lumens per watt, which with 100 lumen per watt T8 lamps and ballasts, translates to about 71% fixture efficiency– While same type of fixture gets 85 - 89% fixture efficiency rating from

good independent labs– Something should be done so more consistency between CALiPER

lumen per watt out of fixture testing and typical fixture efficiency testing

Page 123: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

123

T8 FLUORESCENTOffice with Finelite HPRs

Page 124: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

124

T8 FLUORESCENT• Existing 2x4 troffers can be cost effectively

retrofitted down to 1F32T8– Standard lensed troffers can often get a 1-cove white

reflector• About $55 - $60 total installed cost

– Parabolic troffers can get upscale kits• About $110 - $120 total installed cost

Page 125: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

125

TROFFERS• 50,000 hour rated LED troffers currently cost about

twice more than high performance 1F32T8 troffers and installation labor may be about the same for both types

• Let’s do some life cycle costing for 75,000 hours– LED troffer

• May cost $150 for parts and labor to retrofit or replace at 50,000 hours, which may get down to $100 at 100,000 hours, so total of $200 at 75,000 hours

– 1F32T8 troffer• May cost $15 for group relamping at 25,000, 50,000 & 75,000

hours and $40 for group reballasting at 50,000 & 100,000 hours, so approximate total of $45 at 75,000 hours

– Less relamping costs if use extra long life lamps, which are rated up to 55,000 hours

Page 126: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

126

SUSPENDED INDIRECT/DIRECT

FIXTURES

Page 127: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

127

LED• LEDs could run cooler with less heat sinking

than in troffers and recessed cans

• Uniform uplight with some not too intense downlight are challenges

• It will take a while for LED suspended fixtures to be cost effective compared high performance fluorescent suspended fixtures– Now LED 4 footer may cost $300 - $400

Page 128: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

128

T8 FLUORESCENT• Well designed suspended indirect/direct fixtures with

1F32T8 per cross section– Can provide quite low power densities– Total installed cost often less than individual troffers

• When can have relatively long rows in new construction and gut rehabs

• One lamp per cross section is usually much better than two or three for– Optimal light distribution

• Usually batwing

– Best fixture efficiency– Lowest wattage– Lowest fixture cost

• Fixture cost may be $25 - $40 per linear foot depending on type of fixture, quantity, etc.

Page 129: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

129

T8 FLUORESCENT• Make sure fixture reflectors are designed for T8s

and not for T5s/T5HOs• There are many good manufacturers and models

Page 130: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

130

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING

WHERE LEDs CAN WORK WITH INCUMBENTS

Page 131: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

131

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING• Task ambient lighting is having relatively low

footcandle ambient lighting and additional task lighting when and where need it

• Light levels drop off exponentially as distance increases between source and task– For example if double distance, 1/4 the footcandles– Much less wattage getting high light levels from a task

light 2’ away from task, than from ceiling fixtures 6’ away from task

• This strategy may be the most cost effective way to have very low power densities while providing good quality lighting

• In typical offices, usually .4 - .6 watts per square foot is easily attainable

Page 132: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

132

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING• Ambient, in offices, works very well with either

– New or retrofitted 2x4 high performance troffers that have 1 high performance & often high Kelvin 32W F32T8 and high performance parallel wired program start ballasting

• Maybe tandem wire ballast per pair of troffers

– New or retrofitted suspended indirect/direct fixtures with 1 high performance & often high Kelvin 32W F32T8 per cross section and high performance parallel wired program start ballasting

• Ambient lighting can provide 10 - 20 footcandles on desks– Often more light is worse than less light, because more light can

cause more glare and higher contrast ratios

Page 133: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

133

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING• Existing task

– For a long time most modular office systems had fluorescent undercabinet task lights

• But most of these fixtures– Use way too much wattage– Are glare bombs

» Hitting shiny paper and/or desks and then bounced into eyes– Provide too much light

» That is why often gray scale tube guards to reduce amount of light, but still uses all of the wattage

– Often difficult to replace ballasts» Many ballast compartments too small for standard sized extra efficient

ballasts– Sometimes still T12s with magnetic ballasts or T8s with magnetic ballasts

– There are some good CFL desk mount task lights• But way too many people still use energy hog incandescent or quartz

halogen

Page 134: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

134

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING• High performance LED task

– There are some very good LED task light systems• One example is the Finelite PLS (Personal Lighting System)

– 3, 6 & 9W undercabinet fixture» Not a glare bomb» Uses metal shelf as a heat sink

– Dimmable 8W desk mount fixture» Can get 70 footcandles directly underneath with no other light sources

– Optional occupancy sensor– For a decent quantity

» 1 undercabinet fixture, 1 desk mount fixture, occupancy sensor, power supply and cables may cost $200 or less in decent quantities

– New version has the switch before the power supply, so zero wattage when fixtures are off

– For individual offices that do not have shelves over desks, often just a desk mount fixture is recommended

Page 135: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

135

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING• Finelite PLS

– Both undercabinets and desk mounts won 2007 Lighting For Tomorrow Awards

– Desk mount, which is also called ‘Curve’ won 2009 Next Generation Luminaires Design Competition

• Best In Class - Task Lighting

www.finelite.com/sustainability/professional-development

Page 136: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

136

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING• There are several other LED office task lights, including

Philips Color

Kinetics UC

Luxo Air Luxo Ninety Steelcase Kast

Philips Alko Lincs100 & sensor

Page 137: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

137

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING• PG&E’s Emerging Technology Program’s ‘High Efficiency

Office Low Ambient / Task Lighting Pilot Project’ – www.etcc-ca.com/project-search/search-results_m126/criteria:1/query:any/

jr_endyear:2009/jr_organization:Pacific+Gas+and+Electric+%28PG%26E%29/order:alpha/page:2/limit:10/

– .66 watts per square foot– If 5000K and high performance fixed output ballasts would have

been used, that power density could have been lower– Although dimming ballasts were used in the suspended ambient

fixtures, that was for tuning, not for energy savings– This report clearly states that it would be much more cost effective

to go with fixed output instant start ballasts

• Since there are millions and millions of square feet of offices in North America and the world, reducing wattage and improving lighting is so important

Page 138: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

138

TASK AMBIENT LIGHTING

• With good task ambient lighting the power density can be low all of the time that expensive and complex dimming daylight harvesting peak load shedding systems are not cost effective– Even with dimming ballasts in ambient fixtures, good task lights

are usually recommended

Page 139: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

139

$0.150 $0.05 /KWH 1st year saved rebate

fixture & application

type

total watts

annual hours

annual elect- rical cost

option letter

retrofit/replacement option descriptiontotal watts

watts per

square foot

watts redux

annual elec- trical

savings

appr. incen-

tive

appr. installed

cost

rated lamp life @ 3

hour cycles

pay- back just

elec- tricity

payback including

maintenance savings &

worker productivity

benefits

long term

benefit just elec-

tricity

long term benefit

including maintenance

savings & worker

productivity benefits

ARetrofit each troffer with 3 25W F32T8 5000K lamps & .71 BF extra efficient program start parallel wired ballast

112 0.93 68 $41 $14 $12030,000 - 36,000

2.6 2.2 $506 $628

B

Retrofit each troffer with upscale kit which eliminates parabolic louvers, 1 high lumen F32T8 5000K lamp & 1.15 BF extra efficient program start ballast

78 0.65 102 $61 $20 $23030,000 - 36,000

3.4 1.9 $708 $1,443

B1

Retrofit each troffer with upscale kit which eliminates parabolic louvers, 1 high lumen F32T8 5000K lamp & .89 BF extra efficient program start ballast. Also include 7W LED task light.

67 0.56 113 $68 $23 $31030,000 - 36,000 for T8s

4.2 2.1 $730 $1,747

B2

Retrofit each troffer with upscale kit which eliminates parabolic louvers, 1 high lumen F32T8 5000K lamp & .71 BF extra efficient program start ballast. Also include 2 7W LED task lights.

62 0.52 118 $71 $24 $38030,000 - 36,000 for T8s

5.0 2.3 $706 $1,980

C

Remove both troffers. Install 8' suspended indirect/direct fixture that has 2 high lumen F32T8 5000K lamps & 1.15 BF extra efficient program start ballast.

70 0.58 110 $66 $22 $41030,000 - 36,000

5.9 2.7 $602 $1,790

C1

Remove both troffers. Install 8' suspended direct/indirect fixture that has 2 high lumen F32T8 5000K lamps & .89 BF extra efficient instant start ballast. Also include 7W LED task light.

63 0.53 117 $70 $23 $49030,000 - 36,000 for T8s

6.6 2.7 $586 $2,166

C2

Remove both troffers. Install 8' suspended direct/indirect fixture that has 2 high lumen F32T8 5000K lamps & .71 BF extra efficient instant start ballast. Also include 2 7W LED task lights.

60 0.50 120 $72 $24 $56030,000 - 36,000 for T8s

7.4 2.7 $544 $2,488

F2Retrofit each troffer with 3 15W LED T8 lamps. Also include 2 7W LED task lights to provide sufficient light.

104 0.87 76 $46 $15 $64025,000 - 50,000

13.7 8.6 $59 $470

GRemove both troffers. Install 2 high performance 2x2 LED troffers, set at full 41W, so sufficient light at end of life.

82 0.68 98 $59 $20 $900 50,000 15.0 9.4 $2 $531

G1Remove both troffers. Install 2 high performance 2x2 LED troffers, set at 34W. Also include 7W LED task light.

75 0.63 105 $63 $21 $980 50,000 15.2 8.5 -$14 $742

G2Remove both troffers. Install 2 high performance 2x2 LED troffers, set at 28W. Also include 2 7W LED task lights.

70 0.58 110 $66 $22 $1,060 50,000 15.7 8.7 -$48 $744

$108

KWH rate

existing

copyright of Stan Walerczyk of Lighting Wizards, www.lightingwizards.com, 1/10/10 version

12 x 10 x 9 office area with 2 2x4 18 cell parabolic troffers, each with 3 32W 700 series 20,000 hour rated F32T8s and generic .88 BF ballasting (1.51 watts per square foot)

180 4000

TYPICAL OFFICE 12' long x 10' wide x 9' high

15 years of long term benefit

proposed

Page 140: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

140

FUTURE OF

INTERIOR LIGHTING

Page 141: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

141

FUTURE OF INTERIOR LIGHTING

• It sure looks like it will be– Color changing LEDs

• Match daylight throughout the day• Benefits of spectrally enhanced lighting for a variety of tasks• For aesthetics • For circadian rhythms

– Philips has already started with fluorescents in elementary schools» http://live.philips.com/index.php/global/video/philips-schoolvision-long-no-

testimonials-du/696111180001

– With personal wireless controls

Page 142: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

142

NOW SOME

SPECIFICEXTERIOR

COMPARISONS

NOW SOME

SPECIFICEXTERIOR

COMPARISONS

Page 143: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

143

WALL WASHING EMC BUILDING IN IOWA

• Mike Lambert’s project

• Custom Musco LED fixtures

• Reduced wattage by 88.5% replacing MH

Page 144: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

144

WALL WASHING EMC BUILDING IN IOWA

Page 145: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

145

LED vs. INDUCTION STREETLIGHTS

• The short version of my white paper is available on my website for free– Its eight pages has the same information

that is in this seminar– I am working on expanding it, so it will

have detailed information that is not in this seminar

Page 146: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

146

lighting source

qualifier lamp

wattagerated life

hoursinitial

lumens

EOL lumen mainten-

ance

EOL lumens

(approx.)

system wattage (277V)

initial lumens per

watt

EOL lumens per watt

fixture efficiency (approx.)

initial fixture lumens per

watt

initial fixture lumens

EOL fixture lumens

per watt

EOL fixture lumens

HPSclear lamp

10024,000 - 40,000

9,500 75% 7125 130 73 55 75% 55 7125 41 5344

Sylvania 7060,000 - 100,000

6,500 64% 4160 77 84 54 70% 59 4550 38 2912

Philips 8560,000 - 100,000

6,000 70% 4200 85 71 49 70% 49 4200 35 2940

Sylvania 10060,000 - 100,000

8,000 64% 5120 103 78 50 70% 54 5600 35 3584

Sylvania 15060,000 - 100,000

12,000 64% 7680 156 77 49 70% 54 8400 34 5376

Philips 16560,000 - 100,000

12,000 70% 8400 165 73 51 70% 51 8400 36 5880

4000K 350ma

50 1W LEDs

50,000+ - 100,000

NA 70% NA 67 NA NA NA 58 3866 40 2706

4000K 525ma

40 1W LEDs

50,000+ - 100,000

NA 70% NA 70 NA NA NA 61 4239 42 2967

6000K 350ma

40 1W LEDs

50,000+ - 100,000

NA 70% NA 50 NA NA NA 72 3606 50 2524

6000K 525ma

30 1W LEDs

50,000+ - 100,000

NA 70% NA 54 NA NA NA 67 3624 47 2537

Listed LED specs would provide sufficient light for minimum footcandles between fixtures and around designated perimeters, but maybe not for average footcandles.Stan Walerczyk of Lighting Wizards www.lightingwizards.com 2/20/10 version

Listed induction fixture efficiency is better than most IES files, because includes when lamps are properly prepared and some recent fixture improvements.

4000K includes 4000 - 4500 Kelvin. Some people think that 6000K is too blue. LEDs driven at 350ma would have longer life than at 525ma.LED fixtures are tested as complete units, not based on components.

Table does NOT include where the available lumens out of the fixture are directed. LED fixtures direct light where necessary, so fewer lumens are required.Since Induction lamps have same or worse optical control as HPS, their EOL fixture lumens should match HPS EOL fixture lumens.

HPS, INDUCTION & LED COBRAHEAD GENERAL COMPARISON TABLE

notesEOL is end of life. NA is not applicable. Real rated life is discussed in related white paper. HPS and LED info is generic. Induction fixture info is also generic.100W generator is used with Sylvania 70W induction lamp. For induction EOL numbers are based on 100,000 hours, and EOL numbers would be better at 60,000.

Induction

LED

Page 147: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

147

ISOLUX DIAGRAM FOR TYPE II STREET LIGHTING

• The following three isolux diagrams came from PG&E for City of Santa Rosa, which base case is 100W HPS cobraheads

• Distribution patterns and amount of footcandles would vary some what with various manufacturers and models– But general distribution patterns are pretty consistent for HPS,

induction and well designed LED cobraheads

• These are with bottom flat lensed HPS and induction cobraheads– SAG or drop lens would increase light between fixtures, but also not

be good for dark skies and light pollution on house and opposite sides

Page 148: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

100W HPS

Calculation Summary

Label CalcType Units Avg. Max. Min. Avg/Min. Max/Min.

Layout 1_Lum L_Roadway Cd/Sq. M. 0.26 0.76 0.09 2.09 0.44

Layout 1_Ill Illuminance Fc 0.40 1.96 0.12 3.33 16.33

Layout 1_Lv L Veiling Cd/Sq. M. 0.02 0.10 0.00 N.A. N.A.

Layout 1_STV Vis. Level N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

100W HPS

Page 149: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

85W INDUCTION

Calculation Summary

Label CalcType Units Avg. Max. Min. Avg/Min. Max/Min.

Layout 1_Lum L_Roadway Cd/Sq. M. 0.13 0.43 0.03 4.33 14.33

Layout 1_Ill Illuminance Fc 0.21 0.95 0.03 7.00 31.67

Layout 1_Lv L Veiling Cd/Sq. M. 0.01 0.03 0.00 N.A. N.A.

Layout 1_STV Vis. Level N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Page 150: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

70W LED

Calculation Summary

Label CalcType Units Avg. Max. Min. Avg/Min. Max/Min.

Layout 1_Lum L_Roadway Cd/Sq. M. 0.29 0.97 0.10 2.90 9.70

Layout 1_Ill Illuminance Fc 0.35 1.12 0.12 2.92 9.33

Layout 1_Lv L Veiling Cd/Sq. M. 0.03 0.12 0.00 N.A. N.A.

Layout 1_STV Vis. Level N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Page 151: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

151

WHAT IS BETTER THAN LUMENS PER WATT?

Footcandles, and really footcandles where the light is necessary, per watt

Page 152: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

152

units 85W induction 100W HPS 60 LEDsfixture mounting height feet 28 28 28roadway width feet 40 40 40pole spacing feet 120 120 120illuminance - average maintained fc 0.64 0.78 0.69illuminance - maximum maintained fc 1.6 2.3 1.3illuminance - minimum maintained fc 0.1 0.3 0.4uniformity - avg/min 6.4 2.6 1.7system power watts 85 130 71100 x avg fc/watt 7.5 6.0 9.7100 x min fc/watt 1.2 2.3 5.6

FOOTCANDLES PER WATT

based on the work by Chris Nye at Leotek, www.leotek.com

Page 153: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

153

LOOK FOR THESE APPLICATIONS

FOR LEDS• Where full cut-off for dark sky and maybe

other concerns is important

• Where getting sufficient light in far corners of necessary area without excessive light underneath fixture

Page 154: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

154

LOOK FOR THESE APPLICATIONS

FOR LEDS• 24 hour applications, like garages, because

most potential savings

• Garages and parking lots where can use occupancy sensors for high/low or on/off lighting– Neither of these shorten LED life, like they can

for other lighting technologies– No long warm up and restrike times like HID

Page 155: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

155

LOOK FOR THESE APPLICATIONS

FOR LEDS• Replacing relatively low wattage HPS and standard or probe

start MH lamps with magnetic ballasts– Lower wattage HID lamps and ballasts are considerably less

efficacious than higher wattage ones• HPS (initial lumens per watt including magnetic ballast)

– 69 for 100W– 107 for 400W (55% better)

• MH (initial lumens per watt including mag ballast)– 65 for 175W – 79 for 400W (22% better)

– Lower wattage MH lamps typically have much shorter lamp life than higher wattage ones

– For example, 10,000 hours for 175W and 20,000 hours for 400W

Page 156: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

156

LOOK FOR THESE APPLICATIONS

FOR LEDS• Replacing relatively low wattage HPS and standard or probe start MH

lamps with magnetic ballasts– Higher wattage and lumen HID lamps and the fixtures for them often cost

about the same as lower wattage versions• But since more LEDs are required to replace high wattage HID fixtures, LED

fixtures with more LEDs cost significantly more than LED fixtures with fewer LEDs

• HPS because ugly yellow color and low S/P ratio• HID fixtures with low fixture efficiency, bad optics, not dark sky

compliant, etc.– A few fixture type examples

• Typical cobra head• Acorn without reflector which would prevent too much uplight

• Ballasts in existing fixtures nearing end of rated life• Have to buy new fixtures anyway, so can do financials by subtracting

cost of baseline fixtures

Page 157: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

157

LOOK FOR THESE APPLICATIONS

FOR LEDS• New construction– Often fewer LED pole fixtures will be required,

because of better distribution patterns• So even if the unit pricing on LED fixtures is more, if

need fewer of them, poles, foundations and trenching, the total job cost can be significantly less, not even including electrical savings

• I clearly saw this for a new parking lot for one of my clients in the San Francisco Bay Area comparing pulse start quartz MH lamps with magnetic ballasts in high performance vertical base up fixtures compare to high performance LED fixtures

– Required 20% less LED fixtures, poles, labor, etc.

Page 158: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

158

INDUCTION

Page 159: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

159

INDUCTION• Since fall of 2009 LED have become significantly

better than induction for cobraheads, cold storage hibays and many other applications– LED can even cost less, like in Chula Vista

• Induction can still be a good solution for the acorn post top type of application that optical control is not important– With large size of induction lamps would need fixtures as

big as large kitchen sinks for decent optical control– There are also some good LED kits and new fixtures for

this type of application

Page 160: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

160

INDUCTION• Induction will probably become an afterthought in a

year or two• If you want to go with induction

– Recommend only go with Philips or Sylvania, because they have stated that they will continue providing product, support for the long term

– Who know what other domestic and import manufacturers and sales firms will be around down the road

– Several of the other induction companies infringe on Philips and/or Sylvania patents

Page 161: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

161

ELECTRONICALLY BALLASTED

PS MH (PULSE START METAL HALIDE)

Page 162: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

162

ELECTRONICALLY BALLASTED PS MH

• Two types of PS MH– Ceramic or CMH

• 90+ CRI• Up to 110 lumens/watt• Does not work with all electronic ballasts• Long restrike times even with electronic ballasts• Quite expensive

– Quartz• 65 - 70 CRI• Lower lumens per watt• 30 second to few minute restrike time• Usually can work on all electronic ballasts• Relatively inexpensive

Page 163: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

163

ELECTRONICALLY BALLASTED PS MH

• Electronic ballasts (EHID)– These have been quite expensive, like $150– I have had concerns about heat, including in dark colored fixtures

blasted by summer sun, even when not on• But at least Metrolight has an external pod, with excellent thermal

design– www.metrolight.com

• PS MH lamp life may be up to 60,000 hours, but that should be verified from lamp manufacturers’ and/or ballast manufacturers’ extended warranty

Page 164: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

164

ELECTRONICALLY BALLASTED PS MH

• LEDs are probably better to replace up to175 or 250W HPS or standard magnetically driven MH

• But electronically ballasted PS MH may be currently more cost effective to replace 250, 400 and higher wattage HPS or standard MH with magnetic ballasts

• Philips Widelite EON fixtures– 2 or 3 PS MH lamps in a fixture with electronic ballast– One lamp on at a time, for about 60,000 hours

• When burns out, Philips thinks that fixtures could be replaced with LED fixtures

– Aiming at $250 for a cobrahead– www.widelite.com

Page 165: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

165

PLASMA

Page 166: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

166

PLASMA• Luxim has developed a chicklet sized lamp with

plasma metal halides, driven by a high frequency amplifier

• This is really a point source• This technology is quite expensive• Cannot really compete against LED in relatively low

wattage applications• But may be more competitive than LEDs replacing

400W MH or HPS or 1000W MV– So many LEDs would be required, which brings the cost

up

Page 167: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

167

PLASMA• First fixture manufacturer and model is Stray Light’s Tesla

– http://straylightoptical.com

– Other fixture manufacturers are also working with Luxim

• There are also competitors to Luxim

Page 168: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

168

ALL OF STAN’S PRESENTATIONS• ADVANCED LIGHTING RETROFIT OPTIONS

– With John Fetters

• INTERIORS - LEDs vs. Incumbents: With a big dose of task ambient lighting• EXTERIOR LIGHTING - LED, Induction, HPS, MH, Plasma, Fluorescent• FREE FOR ALL IN THE HIBAY ARENA - Fluorescent, Induction, LED & MH • HOW DO LEDs COMPARE WITH HIGH PERFORMANCE FLUORESCENT,

INDUCTION, HALOGEN, PLASMA, HID– Significant new material, but not as in depth as dedicated interiors or exteriors ones

• HOW LOW CAN YOU GO• DIMMING vs. NON-DIMMING - 10 Rounds in the Daylight Harvesting and Peak

Load Reduction Arena• LIGHTING 101• RETROFIT (WITHOUT UPGRADE) = WASTED OPPORTUNITY

– Will present this one Tuesday 4:30 - 6:00 PM

• THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE UGLY– Developed for IES Sections

• WHERE, WHEN & WHICH LIGHTING CONTROLS ARE REALLY COST EFFECTIVE

• Also custom ones for specific purposes

Page 169: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

169

•QUESTIONS

•COMMENTS

•APPLICATIONS

Page 170: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

170

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO FOLLOW UP

• Contact information for Stan Walerczyk– 925-944-9481(San Francisco Bay Area) – [email protected]– www.lightingwizards.com

Page 171: How do le ds compare with  lightfair 1-1-11

171

Please remember to complete the course evaluation.

Thank You.

We hope you enjoy the trade show and conference!

We hope to see you at LFI 2012!www.lightfair.com

Stay Connected. Only at LIGHTFAIR.