how slow pages hurt the entire user experience: understanding the neurological impact of poor...

50
Tammy Everts RWD Summit – April 2014 How Slow Pages Hurt the Entire User Experience Understanding the neurological impact of poor performance

Upload: radware

Post on 20-Aug-2015

2.912 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Tammy Everts

RWD Summit – April 2014

How Slow Pages Hurt

the Entire User Experience

Understanding the neurological impact

of poor performance

It’s a mobile-first world.

Slide 3

55% of all time spent on retail sites takes place on a mobile device.

comScore, October 2013

Slide 4

Slide 5

Stuart McMillan, Schuh’s Journey to RWD (Conversion Conference 2013)

Four all-too-common

mobile assumptions

Slide 7

Assumption #1

My site isn’t slow on mobile.

Two things are slowing down your site for mobile

(and they’re completely beyond your control).

• Latency – can range

from 35 milliseconds

to 350+ milliseconds

per resource (e.g. images,

CSS files)

• Connection – 3G can be

up to 15 times slower

than broadband

Slide 10

RWD is awesome, but it *can* come

with performance penalties.

Slide 11

Assumption #2

Mobile users expect pages to be slow.

Slide 12

Keynote, 2012 Mobile User Survey

Slide 13

Slide 14

Assumption #3

Mobile users want to browse, not buy.

Slide 15

By 2017, retail mcommerce is expected to hit $113 billion – 26% of total ecommerce sales.

eMarketer, September 2013

Mobile shopping cart abandonment rate is 39% greater than desktop rate.

2013 Google I/O

Slide 16

Slide 17

Assumption #4

Users will stick around, even if pages

are slow, if they really want to buy.

Skava/Harris Interactive, 2013

Slide 18

Slide 19

Case study: The impact of HTML delay on mobile business metrics

Why neuroscientific mobile testing?

Slide 20

Slide 21

• 2010 EEG study of desktop

users

• Throttled connection from 5MB

to 2MB

• Found that participants had to

concentrate up to 50% harder

• Afterward, participants reported

negative brand associations

Slide 22

Slide 23

What is emotional

engagement research?

“95% of the consumer’s

decisions are made at the

subconscious level.”

Dr. Gerald Zaltman, Harvard UniversityExecutive Committee of Harvard University’s

Mind, Brain and Behavior Interfaculty Initiative

Slide 25

The problem with surveys…

Traditional research relies on eliciting post-cognitive

responses.

But thinking and talking about emotions changes and

distorts them.

Slide 26

Five benefits of neuroscientific testing

1 Evaluates think/feel (not say)

2 Quantified data

3 Moment-by-moment interaction

4 Cause-and-effect triggers

5 Fresh, deeper insights

Slide 27

EEG Emotional Engagement Study

Our research team

• Seren – leaders in customer experience & service design

• NeuroStrata – expert consultants in blending neuromarketing

applications

• Neurosense – global leader in implicit methodologies

Slide 29

The brands we tested

Slide 30

Our testers

• 24 testers (12 male and 12 female)

• Pre-screened to ensure normal cognitive functioning

• Experienced mobile device users

• Did not know they were part of a performance study

Slide 31

Methodology

• Standardized set of shopping tasks (browsing and checkout)

• Testers served sites over one of two speeds:

– normal Wifi

– artificial 500ms delay

• Using EEG headset and eyetracker, measured moment-by-

moment responses

Slide 32

Slide 33

Slide 34

Why test a 500ms delay?

Case study: The impact of HTML delay on mobile business metrics

Slide 35

We focused on the metrics most affected by the 500ms delay.

Frustration

Emotional engagement

Slide 36

Normal speed

Slide 37

2.66s 2.92s 2.83s 4.24s

Frustration levels across sites (normal speed)

Slide 38

Engagement levels across sites (normal speed)

Slide 39

500ms delay: Peak frustration results

Slide 40

500ms delay: Average engagement results

Slide 41

Impact of site speed on post-test brand association

Slide 42

If pages aren’t fast, everything suffers.

Content “boring”

Visual design “tacky” and “confusing”

Navigation “frustrating” and “hard-to-navigate”

Slide 43

Slide 44

Takeaways

1 People feel “web stress” even when shopping under ideal

conditions.

2 Slower web performance has a clear and measurable impact

on people at a neurological level.

3 Slow sites can seriously undermine overall brand health.

4 The nature and scale of impact varies, depending on a

number of factors (e.g. inherent strength/weakness of brand).

5 This presents great opportunities to strengthen overall brand

by investing in performance optimization.

Slide 46

Slide 47

Sources

Web Stress: A Wake-Up Call for European Business (Foviance, 2010)

http://www.ca.com/us/~/media/files/supportingpieces/final_webstress_survey_report_229296.aspx

2013 Social & Mobile Commerce Consumer Report (Shop.org / comScore)

http://shop.org/research/original/2013-social-mobile-commerce-consumer-report

2012 Mobile User Survey (Keynote)

http://www.keynote.com/docs/reports/Keynote-2012-Mobile-User-Survey.pdf

2013 State of the Union: Mobile Ecommerce Performance (Radware)

http://www.radware.com/mobile-sotu2013/

The Danger of a Poor Mobile Shopping Experience [INFOGRAPHIC]

http://www.getelastic.com/the-danger-of-a-poor-mobile-shopping-experience-infographic/

Case study: The impact of HTML delay on mobile business metrics (Web Performance Today, November 2011)

http://www.webperformancetoday.com/2011/11/23/case-study-slow-page-load-mobile-business-metrics/

Slide 49

webperformancetoday.com

twitter.com/tameverts

linkedin.com/in/tammyeverts

plus.google.com/+TammyEverts/

Slide 50

Questions?