how to detect and avoid toxic employees - wonderlic...wonderlic’s powerfully simple pre-employment...

16
How to Detect and Avoid TOXIC EMPLOYEES © Wonderlic, Inc. 2018

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • How to Detect and AvoidTOXIC EMPLOYEES

    © Wonderlic, Inc. 2018

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • WHATDOES TOXIC MEAN?TOXIC TOXIC

    Definition: Acting as or having the effect of a poison; poisonous.

    It comes down to PEOPLE andthe BEHAVIORS they exhibit.

    How is this “POISON” expressedin the workplace?

    AND...TOXIC BEHAVIOR IS CONTAGIOUS.

    EXAMPLES OF TOXICEMPLOYEES’ BEHAVIORS:

    - WATER COOLER TALKERS

    - “AFTER THE MEETING” GUYS

    - DOUBTING THOMAS’S

    - NAYSAYERS

    - PEOPLE WHO CONSISTENTLYPROJECT NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS

    OR NEGATIVE OUTCOMES

    WHATDOESTOXICMEAN?

    Definition: Acting as or having the effect of a poison; poisonous.

    It comes down to PEOPLE andthe BEHAVIORS they exhibit.

    How is this “POISON” expressedin the workplace?

    AND...TOXIC BEHAVIOR IS CONTAGIOUS.

    EXAMPLES OF TOXIC EMPLOYEES:

    - WATER COOLER TALKER

    - “AFTER THE MEETING” GUY

    - DOUBTING THOMAS

    - NAYSAYER

    - NEGATIVE OUTCOME PROJECTOR

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • WHAT DAMAGE CAN BE DONE?

    Toxic employees have a remarkably strong impact on voluntary attrition

    They “destroy the social fabricof the organization by creating

    friction, drama, tension and hostilityamong other employees”

    Coping with ‘Hurricane’ Employees. Knowledge@Wharton (2013, November 18)

    Cornerstone/Kellogg 2014

    Did you know that the estimated ‘costs’of hiring a single Toxic Employeeamong a team of 20 is $13,000?

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • 30% drop in team performancedue to one bad apple69% of employers report being adversely affected by a bad hire41% estimated the cost of a bad hire to be more than $25,00024% said a bad hire cost more than $50,000

    54%increase in the

    likelihood of losing agood employee due to

    the presence of justONE toxic employee

    $$loss of revenue

    due toclient dissatisfaction

    after exposureto a toxic employee

    LOWER PRODUCTIVITY:

    INCREASED TURNOVER: DECREASED REVENUE:

    Cornerstone/Kellogg 2014

    $25K

    $50K

    STUDIES SHOW TOXIC EMPLOYEES CAUSE...

    30% drop in team performancedue to one bad apple69% of employers report being adversely affected by a bad hire41% estimated the cost of a bad hire to be more than $25,00024% said a bad hire cost more than $50,000

    54%increase in the

    likelihood of losing agood employee due to

    the presence of justONE toxic employee

    $$loss of revenue

    due toclient dissatisfaction

    after exposureto a toxic employee

    LOWER PRODUCTIVITY

    INCREASED TURNOVER DECREASED REVENUE

    Cornerstone/Kellogg 2014

    STUDIES SHOW TOXIC EMPLOYEES CAUSE...

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • - Companies spend an average of 5-7 seconds looking at resumes – focusing mainly on

    previous experience & salary requirements

    Wharton, 2013

    But, it is harder than ever to predict a good hire:

    It is CRITICAL that employersfocus their attention on avoidingtoxic employees in the first place.

    Buzz!

    - Candid reference checks beyond a person’s name

    and employment confirmation

    are rare

    - Job seekershave learned to

    game the onlineapplication system

    by using key ‘buzz’ words

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • TEST.

    So how can you PREDICT if anew hire will meet the company’s needs

    or sabotage the company’s culture?

    The good news is that there are valid assessments that can beused to identify potentially bad hires.

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • Pre-Employment Tests Can HelpIDENTIFY Toxicity

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS

    Identify if they are not intellectuallyup to the demands of the job

    PERSONALITY TESTS

    Identify if their behavioral tendenciesare not suited to the job

    MOTIVATION TESTS

    Identify if they lack the drive andmotivation your business needs

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS

    Research showsCognitive Ability is the

    single best predictor ofjob performance

    A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.

    A hire with a misaligned cognitive score: · Is less likely to follow rules and procedures · Is more likely to deplete team energy and efficiency

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • Low intelligence teams had: · Lower task performance · Worse safety compliance · Less safety participation

    In a study of 312 nuclearpower plant operators:

    Zhang J., Li Y., Wu C. (2013)

    The higher the operators’ ability, the more likely they are to reflect more thoughtfully,avoid overload and have better mutual monitoring.

    In highly complex working environments such as NPPs, operators have to make a correct judgment of the current situation and decide the most proper sequence of procedures to adopt before taking any actions or making suggestions.

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • PERSONALITY TESTS

    Based on theFive Factor Model –the most researchedmodel of personality

    The Five Factor Model

    Openness toExperience

    Conscientiousness*

    Extraversion

    Agreeableness

    Stability*

    1 2 3 4 5

    Colbert, Mount, Michael, Harter, Witt & Barrick (2004)

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • A hire with misaligned personality scores will more likely engage in deviant behavior when the employee has a negative perception of the workplace. · Low conscientiousness · Low agreeableness · Low stability · Poor fit with work assignment

    In a study of 853 employees from a variety of work settings:

    Colbert, Mount, Michael, Harter, Witt & Barrick (2004)

    Workplace deviance occurs when an employee voluntarily pursues a course of action that threatens the well-being of the individual or the organization. Examples: stealing, hostile behavior and withholding effort.

    When employees have unfavorable perceptions of their situation at work, they are more likely to violate organizational norms.

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • MOTIVATION TESTS

    Predict effort,performance,

    resilienceand turnover

    A hire with a low motivation score is more likely to decrease the engagement of co-workers and direct reports. Subsequent engagement items were rated lower in a toxic environment.

    In a study of 2,853 employeesfrom 365 work units:

    Wonderlic (2015)

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • Toxicity Affects Employee Engagement

    Wonderlic (2015)

    Respondents with toxicleaders rated low on

    Respondents with toxicco-workers rated low on

    · My SUPERVISOR will reward successful performance

    · I have a relationship with my SUPERVISOR which would be difficult to break

    · My SUPERVISOR treats me with fairness and respect

    · I am inspired by my SUPERVISOR to do my best

    · I am inspired by my ORGANIZATION to do my best

    · I will be fairly rewarded for achieving my objectives

    · I feel safe to share my ideas with my ORGANIZATION

    · I speak highly of my TEAM when talking to others

    · I enjoy working with my TEAM

    Survey research shows...

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb

  • Wonderlic’s powerfully simple pre-employment solutionassesses and ranks potential employees in the areas

    scientifically proven to predict job performance.

    Try it for FREE!No credit card required. Get started now.

    Start your free trial

    These three components – cognitive ability, personality, motivation –

    can help identify toxicity.

    Start Testing to Avoid Toxic Hires.

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_ebhttps://www.wonderlic.com/wonscore/about-wonscore/

  • RESOURCES

    1. Cornerstone/Kellogg Study: Toxic Employees in the Workplace Hidden Costs and How to Spot Them

    2. Havoc in the Workplace: Coping with ‘Hurricane’ Employees. Knowledge@Wharton (2013, November 18)

    3. Fierce, Inc. Study. Fierceinc.com

    4. The Real Costs of Keeping a Toxic Employee By Will Yakowicz. Inc.com

    5. CareerBuilder 2012 Survey. CareerBuilder.com

    6. 7 Warning Signs That You've Got a Highly Toxic Employee By Peter Economy. Inc.com

    https://www.wonderlic.com/?utm_source=nurture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_term=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_eb&utm_content=nurturepdf_toxicemployees_ebhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0CDW3uHNns5VXhNdkE3VXdtdDA/view?usp=sharinghttp://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/corporate-disaster-zones-coping-hurricane-employees/http://www.fierceinc.com/resources/surveys/toxic-employeeshttp://www.inc.com/will-yakowicz/one-toxic-employee-will-spoil-whole-bunch.htmlhttp://thehiringsite.careerbuilder.com/2012/12/13/cost-of-a-bad-hire/https://www.inc.com/peter-economy/7-warning-signs-that-you-ve-got-a-highly-toxic-employee.html