how to establish a multi hospital stemi transfer system d2b webinar slides (10.05.09).pdf2005: 6...
TRANSCRIPT
How to Establish a MultiHow to Establish a Multi‐‐ Hospital STEMI Transfer SystemHospital STEMI Transfer System
Dr. Greg Mishkel for the Doctors of Prairie Cardiovascular
and in collaboration with ourCommunity & Springfield Hospitals
Barriers to PPCI STEMI Care in Central Illinois•Limited facilities•Long inter-hospital travel distances•Limited ACLS EMS accessibility•Variability in ED services (locum tenens)
Barriers to PPCI STEMI Care in Central Illinois•Limited facilities•Long inter-hospital travel distances•Limited ACLS EMS accessibility•Variability in ED services (locum tenens)
MI: Evolution of care in Central Illinois•1990’s early adoption/promotion of iv thrombolyis = “drip & ship”•2000 adoption of mechanical reperfusion • 2002: Establish Institutional processes for acute MI care• 2005: DANAMI/PRAGUE/MHI model: Inter-hospital transfer to TWO Springfield hospitals (St. John’s Hospital, Memorial Medical Center) = PRAIRIE STAT HEART PROGRAM
2005: 6 Referral CentersMean Transfer Distance: 46 miles
(range:28-88)4: Helicopter, 2: Ambulance
20092009
So how was this done?
Physician leadership, physician buy in
Full time co‐ordinator/facilitator (communications, logistics,
deal with “SNAFU’s”, educational events)
Hospital commitment (funding, quality, cath
lab personnel)
Establish effective high quality ER STEMI program
Establish lines of communication (ERswitchboardcath
lab)
Treatment guidelines
Monitor outcomes, modify procedures
Reduce readmissions
Build on success of local program to entice outside programs to
be “part of the team”
Regular (annual?) of all
participants (we include the switchboard
operators) in educational forums/updates to share
results/successes/challenges
What do all of these first 3 requirements have in common
PEOPLE NOT STRUCTURES
Dofasco Steel my first summer job in Hamilton,
Ontario
“Our product is Steel…Our Strength is People”
So how was this done?
Physician leadership, physician buy in
Full time co‐ordinator/facilitator (communications, logistics, deal
with “SNAFU’s”, educational events)
Hospital commitment (funding, quality, cath
lab personnel)
Establish effective high quality ER STEMI program (St. John’s
* 90)
Establish lines of communication (ERswitchboardcath
lab)
Treatment guidelines
Monitor outcomes, modify procedures
Reduce readmissions
Build on success of local program to entice outside programs to
be “part of the team”
Regular (annual?) of all
participants (we include the switchboard
operators) in educational forums/updates to share
results/successes/challenges
STEMI: Where We Started at our hospital
Doing well: performing above the average hospital for STEMI care
in Crusade
and NRMI registries, but wanted to be exceptional
Formation of AMI Team in 2003 to target performance above the top 10% of
Crusade/Action registry hospitals
Formal Intervention started late 2003/early 2004
Obstacles to performance improvement included distance of new ED
from
cath
lab, lack of standardized protocols and medical record documentation.
AMI Team Strategic Goals
Achieve D2B time of <90 minutes for 100% of STEMI patients
Implement standardized, evidence based and guideline driven
pathways of care to improve quality
Achieve 100% compliance with admission and discharge
medications for all AMI patients
Achieve results above the top 10% of Action registry hospitals for
STEMI care
EKG done within 5 minutes for patients with chest pain
ED Door to cath
lab arrival of < 30 minutes
Cath
Lab arrival to balloon dilatation of < 25 minutes
Implement pre‐hospital ECG
Methods
Formation of a multidisciplinary AMI team with quarterly meetings in Fall of
2003
ED meds bundled‐ASA, Beta Blocker, Heparin, and Nitroglycerin
ED physician empowered to concurrently activate cardiologist and
cath
lab
team upon diagnosis of STEMI with STAR 90 page
Cardiologist meets and evaluates patient in cath
lab, not ED
Accountability and tracking form following patient through process allowing
evaluation of performance of various phases of the D2B process
Implementation of guideline driven treatment protocol and procedural
protocol
Weekday night team resides in hospital
Benchmarking of performance with other centers using Action and MIDAS
registries.
AMI Team
Dr. Charles Lucore, Chairman, Department of Cardiology
Dr. Linda Nordeman, Chairman, Department of Emergency Medicine
Dr. Greg Mishkel
and Frank Mikell, PCCL
Dr. John Nester, Springfield Clinic
Dr. John Byrnes, Emergency Room
Cardiac Catheterization Lab Representatives: Sheryl Friedrich et
al
Emergency Department Representatives: Amy Jones et al
Cardiac Nursing Representatives: Jennifer Cullen et al
Quality Resource Management Representatives: Diane Tebrugge
et al
Health Information Management Representatives: Heather Shankland
et al
AMI Door to Cath
Lab Tracking Sheet
To be completed only for ST elevation and/or LBBB on 1st
12‐lead EKG patients
Arrival Time__________
EKG Time___________
Tech__________
Time Cardiologist paged__________
ED Physician________
Time Cardiologist returns page_______
Cardiologist_________
Cath
Lab notified__________
Cath
lab responds_____
Pt prepared for cath
lab_________
ED Nurse__________
Time Cath
Lab calls for patient________
Pt leaves ED___________
Cath
lab arrival time________
Balloon inflation time________
Complications that may delay process (pt requires intubation, pt
arrests, or requires
additional stabilization, atypical presentation)
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Discharge Medications
2003 – May 2009
(Data from NRMI 4, Action, MIDAS Comparative Performance System (CPMS))
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
AspirinBeta BlockerAce InhibitorStatin/lipid
Top 10% (Action STEMI rpt)ASA 100%Beta Blocker 99%Ace/ARB 95%Statin 97%
ACE #s do not always screen for LVEF < 40% from NRMI report
ASA 99%Beta Blocker 98%Ace/ARB 97%Statin 99%
STEMI Myocardial InfarctionIn-Hospital Events (last 12 months)
St. John’s National Avg. Top 10%
Death Rate (%) 2.8% 5.9% 5.8%
Door to Balloon Time (minutes) 54 71 59Bleeding Requiring Transfusion (%) 2.3% 6.3% 7.4%Stroke 0.60% 0.80% 0.60%Length of Stay (days) 3.6 4.4 4.6
Source: 2nd Qtr 08 - 1st Qtr 2009 ACTION Registry(Get With the Guidelines) Gold Performance Achievement Award for 2009
So how was this done?
Physician leadership, physician buy in
Full time co‐ordinator
(communications, logistics, deal with “SNAFU’s”,
educational events)
Hospital commitment (funding, quality, cath
lab personnel)
Establish effective high quality ER STEMI program
Establish lines of communication (ERswitchboardcath
lab)
Treatment guidelines
Monitor outcomes, modify procedures
Reduce readmissions
Build on success of local program to entice outside programs to be
“part of the team”
Devise (based on local needs) an integrated/consistent one call,
one
protocol
Regular (annual?) of all
participants (we include the switchboard
operators) in educational forums/updates to share
results/successes/challenges
Door In-Door Out
ECGDecision
TreatmentInitiate STAT HeartArrange Transfer
IdealGoal: <30 minutes
Departure-Door 2
TransferAir
Ambulance
<30 minutes <30 minutes
Door 2-Balloon
Cath Lab ArrivalDiagnostic Cath
PCI
Goal: Door-Balloon: ≤
90 min.
Global Components of Process of Transfer STEMI CareCommunity Facility Transport Tertiary Facility
3- 5 min•Suspected MI (Step1)
•12 Lead ECG/STEMI Identified (Step 2)•Determine Bleeding Risk (Step 3)
5-10 minActivate Stat Heart
Team
Call for quickest availabletransport (Step 4)
Ambulance/Helicopter
Call Springfield HospitalActivate
Stat Heart Team
15-20 min
CommunityStat Heart
Team
ED MD2-RN
Ancillary staff
SpringfieldStat Heart
Team
CardiologistCoordinator
Cath LabSecurity
AdmittingAdministrative
RepER contact
Contraindication ProtocolAir/Ground Transport
30 minute Transporttime NOT Available
Low Bleeding Risk
Thrombolytic ProtocolAir/Ground Transport
High Bleeding Risk
PCI ProtocolAir/GroundTransport
30 minute Transporttime Available
Goal: Out the Door in < 30 minutes
Prairie Stat Heart Protocols
Lisa Page, RN
Goal out the door in 30 minutes or less
5-12 minutes
Activate STAT Heart team at community hospital (staff pre-assigned duties) First call -staff calls quickest transport air or ground
(base on mileage between hospitals) Second call – Springfield Hospital receiving pt. Stat Heart team
activated in Springfield. Automatic - accepting Prairie cardiologist and bed assigned.
0-3 minutes Patient presents with chest pain or associated symptoms TREAT ALL patients as potential Stat Heart until deemed otherwise
3-5 minutes ECG done ECG to ED physician for quick diagnosis. ED physician determines if STAT Heart criteria is met.
12-20 minutes
Nurses start IV’s & give standard meds (ASA, Lopressor, NTG)
Physician determines if patient is high bleeding risk (contraindication questions)
Transport time < 30 min. helicopter/ambulance - PCI protocol
Transport time > 30 min. helicopter/ambulance - Thrombolytic protocol
Helicopter or ambulance transfer - Contraindication protocol if pt. is high risk for bleeding (80 yrs or older, on Coumadin etc.)
Give protocol meds
20-30 minutes
EMS transport arrives, packages pt., brief report(transport team is educated on process)
Departure Call receiving Springfield Hospital with departure page
So how was this done?
Physician leadership, physician buy in
Full time co‐ordinator
(communications, logistics, deal with “SNAFU’s”,
educational events)
Hospital commitment (funding, quality, cath
lab personnel)
Establish effective high quality ER STEMI program
Establish lines of communication (ERswitchboardcath
lab)
Treatment guidelines
Monitor outcomes, modify procedures
Reduce readmissions
Build on success of local program to entice outside programs to be “part
of the team”
Devise (based on local needs) an integrated/consistent one call,
one
protocol
Regular (annual?) of all
participants (we include the switchboard
operators) in educational forums/updates to share
results/successes/challenges
SO HOW ARE WE DOING? STAT Heart Population: 2005‐2009
N approx. 600
Comparison Of STEMI Process of Care For
Inter‐hospital Transfer: Door‐Balloon Times
4.2
16.28.6
26.4
13
5964
89
20
64
0102030405060708090
NRMI 3/4 NCDR 2005-2006
Stat Heart-Spr.2008
Stat Heart-Carb.2008
Total StatHeart
< 90 min. < 120 min.% PTS
(n=4278)(n=15,049) (n=338) (n=382)(n=44)
In‐Hospital Clinical Outcomes
Length of hospitalization (mean ± SD days): 3.6 ± 2.5 vs. 5 ± 6.3; p=0.0001
7
3.7
2.62.1
1.2
3
1.10.3 0.05
1.1 0.9
8
5.9
3.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
Death Non-ShockDeath
Re-infarction Stroke Composite
Meta-analysis Stat Heart/07 Stat Heart 8/08% PTS
Comparison Of 30‐day Clinical Outcomes NRMI vs. Stat Heart: Springfield Hub
(n=1472) (n=188)
PROCEDURAL KEYS PROCEDURAL KEYS toto SuccessSuccess1. EARLY RECOGNITION OF MI starts the “interventional cascade”
beginning with QUICK call to helicopter or ambulance for transport
2. A SINGLE call to activate Stat Heart Process in Springfield3. Standardized Protocol/ Orders (PCC and ED physician agree to adhere to standard orders as
written)4. Standardized communications via pager identifies MI, patient departure, 15 minute arrival 5. Cath lab nurse calls after receiving departure page for brief report-cath lab nurse calls community
hospital nurse. Cardiologist and team awaits arrival in cath lab.6. Communication ON-GOING throughout the process from beginning to end7. Rapid transportation via ground or air is mandatory. Regular meetings with these providers8. Education provided to all Stat Heart team members9. Data collection to promote process improvement and quality10. Feedback and reports given promptly (immediately after each case)11. Public education (regarding Sx of MI, program in their area)12. Debrief with Stat Heart team members at regular intervals and especially after failures
(problems compound with out intervention)13. No Blame Environment!14. Continue to innovate. Don’t tolerate failure, don’t rest on success (EKG’s in the field, paramedic
education, earlier initiation of Rx)15. D2B time is important, but it’s LIVES SAVED THAT REALLY COUNTS. Mortality reflects the proof in
the pudding
Conclusions Stat Heart (Rural Inter-Hospital Transfer)
Regional STEMI Program: feasible/safe with reproducible, favorable and comparable process measure outcomes to U.S. Registry, despite program growth among broad range of hospital systems.
Between 2005-2009, the utilization of this coordinated, rural inter-hospital STEMI transfer program, appears to associated with shorter hospitalization
and improved in-
hospital clinical outcomes, as compared to non- standardized pre-STAT Heart STEMI care.
Regional STEMI Program: feasible/safe with reproducible, favorable and comparable process measure outcomes to U.S. Registry, despite program growth among broad range of hospital systems.
Between 2005-2009, the utilization of this coordinated, rural inter-hospital STEMI transfer program, appears to associated with shorter hospitalization
and improved in-
hospital clinical outcomes, as compared to non- standardized pre-STAT Heart STEMI care.
Conclusions Stat Heart (Rural Inter-Hospital Transfer)
Improvements- Procedural Time (wide inter-procedural/inter-operator variability)
- “Standardization” of cardiac cath lab process- Implementation of pre-hospital ECG: Reduce door-in/door-out time
Emphasis on program maintenance and improvement - Avoid complacency (delays): meetings, updates, teamwork (transport, ED’s, ancillary staff, cath lab, administration, etc)- Program-wide commitment to collection, interpretation and dissemination of data- Nimble program: modifiable process/treatment changes
RN Coordinator: Education, education, education!!
Improvements- Procedural Time (wide inter-procedural/inter-operator variability)
- “Standardization” of cardiac cath lab process- Implementation of pre-hospital ECG: Reduce door-in/door-out time
Emphasis on program maintenance and improvement - Avoid complacency (delays): meetings, updates, teamwork (transport, ED’s, ancillary staff, cath lab, administration, etc)- Program-wide commitment to collection, interpretation and dissemination of data- Nimble program: modifiable process/treatment changes
RN Coordinator: Education, education, education!!
Minneapolis Heart Institute
Timothy D. Henry, MD, FACC
EMS COMPONENTS OF A SYSTEM
Non PCI Capable
PCI Capable
Only 50% of STEMI use EMS in the US
10% Pre-hosp ECG
1. PREHOSPITAL2. TRIAGE3. TRANSFER
42.0% PCI hospital is closest facility
79.0% within 60 minute prehospital
time
Primary PCI: Access
Nallamothu et al. Circulation 2006;113:1189
Red– Zone II (90-120 mins)
Blue– Zone I (< 90 mins)
Zone1 ProtocolAspirin 325 mgAspirin 325 mgClopidogrel 600mgClopidogrel 600mgUFHUFHBetaBeta--blockerblockerPCIPCI
Red– Zone II (90-120 mins)
Blue– Zone I (< 90 mins)
Zone 2 ProtocolAspirin 325 mgAspirin 325 mgClopidogrel 600mgClopidogrel 600mgUFHUFHTNK TNK ½½ dosedoseBetaBeta--blockerblockerPCIPCI
Protocol focus:
Simple
Fast
Reduce variability
MHI Level 1 MI: Door – Balloon Times
0102030405060708090
100
ANW Zone 1 Zone 2 NRMI 3/4
< 90 mins<120mins
% o
f pat
ient
s
Kaplan-Meier Survival CurveKaplan-Meier Survival Curve
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Days
Sur
viva
l Pro
babi
lity
ANWZone 1Zone 2
p = 0.31
“Level 1” Heart Attack System
Sioux Falls
A national quality improvement effort led by the ACC and IHI A national quality improvement effort led by the ACC and IHI
which aims to reduce 30which aims to reduce 30‐‐day, allday, all‐‐cause recause re‐‐admission rates for admission rates for
patients discharged with cardiac conditions.patients discharged with cardiac conditions.
Enroll nowEnroll now
to participate in the October 22to participate in the October 22ndnd
kickkick‐‐off webinar! off webinar!
Please visit Please visit www.h2hquality.orgwww.h2hquality.org
or email or email [email protected]@acc.org
for more informationfor more information