how to get the most out of qualitative analysis and focus groups
DESCRIPTION
How to get the most out of qualitative analysis and focus groups. Carol Devine Professor, Division of Nutritional Sciences TRIPLL- 2.23.2011. Focus Group. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Carol DevineProfessor, Division of Nutritional Sciences
TRIPLL- 2.23.2011
1
Focus Group“The explicit use of group interaction to
produce data and insights that would be less accessible without the interaction found in a group.” (Morgan, 1988)
2
Key resources for presentation
3
Sage Publications, 1998
Kruger, R., Casey, M.A. 2009. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage
Why focus groups?Want opinionsUse group dynamicsExplore new topicsCommunication with new groupsMany opinionsPlan additional data collectionPlan an intervention: reactions to messages,
materials or strategies
4
When is a focus group not useful?Need consensusCharged or confidential topicIndividual experiences neededNeed to generalize
5
Example: Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) (NHBLI, P.I. Charlson)
• Purpose: Culturally tailor a weight loss intervention
• Methods: 6 focus groups (3 Spanish, 3 English) from 3 community sites in Harlem & Bronx
• Content: Response to dietary change strategies
6
7
Example: Images of a Healthy Worksite (NCI: P.I. Fernandez)
• Purpose: Develop a feasible and acceptable worksite intervention to prevent weight gain
• Methods: 15 in-depth interviews, 5 focus groups, and community mapping at 2 sites with 79 administrators, managers, workers, and food service personnel
• Content: What would work here?
Devine C, Nelson J, Chin N, Dozier A, Fernandez D. 2007. “Pizza is cheaper than salad:” assessing workers’ views for an environmental food intervention. Obesity. 15: S57-S68.
Example: Women, Weight and Cancer (NIFA, P.I. Devine)
• Purpose: How breast cancer survivors think about healthy eating, physical activity, body weight, and their relationships to cancer• Develop a walking intervention with
community cancer organizations
• Methods: 21 women in 3 focus groups & 15 interviews from 2 communities
8
Study DesignWhy are focus groups the right approach?How will the focus group findings be used?
9
Sampling
Purposive/theoretical sampling
Sample monitoring for characteristics of theoretical importance
Theoretical saturation
10
Group characteristicsAt least 3-4 groups5-8 people per groupHomogeneous
Use separate groups for dissimilar people (gender, ethnicity, age)
Equal in powerUnfamiliar with each other
11
RecruitingCriteria: whose opinions are desired?What would it take to get someone to come?Personal contact with participants
Contact (2 weeks ahead)Invitation (1 week ahead)Reminder (1 day ahead)
Incentives
12
LocationConvenient for participantsPermissive – promote sharing opinionsConfidentialQuietFoodTransportationChild care?
13
Staffing – at least 2Moderator: like the participants
Welcome, overview Ground rules Questions, probes Listen, neutral responses Facilitate participation by all members
Assistant moderator Greet late comers Monitor recording equipment Take notes Handle consent and demographic forms Draw a diagram of participants
14
ToolsConsentsDemographic formsName tentsQuestioning guideDigital tape recorders – 2!Others: Flip charts, visuals, educational
materials, photographs
15
5-6 Open-ended QuestionsEasy open – go around the table
First name, neighborhood, number of children, favorite food, etc.
Introductory Q In the last 25 years the proportion of overweight and obese
adults in the US has risen dramatically. What do you think are some of the factors that have contributed to this increase?
Transition Q How do you see these factors getting played out here at
work?Key Q
What changes in your work place do you think would help workers maintain a healthy weight?
How would people at work respond to changes like these?Final Q – Is there anything else you would like us to know?
Data AnalysisHow will findings be used?Type of analysis
Transcript, Tape, or Note basedLooking for:
Words and meaningContextConsistency or DifferencesIntensityWhat was missing
17
Analysis Coding
what type (by question or open)quality control
Approaches Word processorSpread sheetColored markers on transcriptsPilesSoftware
18
Analytic Steps in One Study
1)Verbatim transcription and tape verification 2)Review transcripts, notes, and demographics by team3)Peer review of each transcript4)Develop initial coding scheme by open coding of
emergent themes by 2 coders5)Iterative revision of the codes as additional groups
coded6)Comparison of coding by corroborators7)Conceptual model to represent the experience of
participants8)Interpret findings in the context of existing
theory/empirical research 9)Peer debriefing with researchers with expertise in
topic10)Member check with participants
19
Your Questions and Comments
20