how to produce horse quality hay - for your information · 2017-06-28 · how to produce horse...
TRANSCRIPT
How to Produce Horse
Quality HayMarch, 2007
Craig SaxeUW-Extension, Juneau Co.211 Hickory StreetMauston WI 53948(608) 847-9329E-mail: [email protected]
The Take Home Message:
Know Your Market
Horse Owners Definition of Good Hay:
• Hay must be green
• Should be no dust or mold
• Must be fine stems and lots of leaves
• Can be no weeds
• Must not have been rained on
• Others?
Hay Score Card
I. Stage of Harvest Possible Score
Before blossom or heading 26-30
Early blossom or heading 21-25
Mid- to Late-bloom or head 16-20
Seed stage (stemmy) 11-15
Hay Score Card
II. Leafiness Possible Score
Very Leafy 26-30
Leafy 21-25
Slightly Stemmy 16-20
Stemmy 0-6
Hay Score Card
III. Color Possible Score
Natural green color of crop 13-15
Light green 10-12
Yellow to slightly brownish 7-9
Brown or black 0-6
Hay Score Card
IV. Odor Possible Score
Clean – “crop odor” 13-15
Dusty 10-12
Moldy – mousey or musty 7-9
Burnt 0-6
Hay Score Card
V. Softness Possible Score
Very Soft and pliable 9-10
Soft 7-8
Slightly harsh 5-6
Harsh, brittle 0-4
Hay Score Card
VI. Penalties Possible Score
Trash, weeds, dirt, etc. Subtract 0-35
Preferred Size and Shape of Hay
• Small rectangular bales• Large rectangular bales• Large round bales• Cubes• Pellets• Haylage/Silage
Horse Requirements
Horse Status Digest. Energy Needed
Working Light 20.5 mcal
Maintenance 16.4 mcal
Working Intense 32.8 mcal
Mare Lactating 28.3 mcal
2 year old in training 26.3 mcal
*Nutrient Research Council Standards
Digestible Energy AvailableDigestible Energy Available
Feed Mcal/lb.
Alfalfa .94
Bromegrass .80
Orchardgrass .85
Straw .70
Oats 1.3
Corn 1.5
Digestible Energy AvailableDigestible Energy Available
Feed Mcal/lb.
Alfalfa:
Early Vegetative 1.32
Late Vegetative 1.26
Early Bloom 1.20
Mid Bloom 1.16
Full Bloom 1.10
Source; Understanding Forage Quality
Source; Understanding Forage Quality
Grass-Legume Mixtures
• Presently over 80% of alfalfa grown in New
York State is grown with a companion crop,
Wisconsin is probably closer to? (20%).
• At one time grass-legume mixtures were the
norm
• Herbicides and adoption of NIR testing using
NDF and ADF reduced grass-legume mixtures
• Grasses don’t always reduce quality and yield
Why Mix Grasses with Legumes
• More rapid hay drying
• Higher yield potential
• Less weed encroachment
• Insurance against legume winterkill
• Helps to fill in areas of field that are not suited for legumes
• Greater traffic tolerance
• Greater response to manure
Forage Quality of Alfalfa Grass Mixes
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80%
ofC
ompo
nent
(DM
basi
s)
63 63 73 93Percent Legume
NDFNDFD
Higher NDF with grass
But higher NDFD
*Undersander
Forage Quality of Alfalfa Grass Mixes
0
50
100
150
200
250R
FV o
r R
FQ V
alue
63 63 73 93
Percent Legume
RFVRFQ
*Undersander
Yield of alfalfa-grass mixtures in 2006
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Arlinigton Marshfield Spooner
alfalfa A + OGEA + OGLA+ PRA+ Tim
SeedingSite Year Arlington 2005Marshfield 2004Spooner 2003
Including grass had no effect on total season yield
*Undersander
First cutting RFQ change
100110120130140150160170180190200
Early Medium Late
Harvest Maturity
RFQ
alfalfa A + OGEA + OGLA+ PRA+ Tim
*Undersander
Second cutting RFQ change
100
110
120
130
140
150
Early Medium Late
Harvest Maturity
RFQ
alfalfa A + OGEA + OGLA+ PRA+ Tim
*Undersander
Third cutting RFQ change
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
Early Medium Late
Harvest Maturity
RFQ
alfalfa A + OGEA + OGLA+ PRA+ Tim
*Undersander
Fourth cutting RFQ change
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
Early Medium Late
Harvest Maturity
RFQ
alfalfa A + OGEA + OGLA+ PRA+ Tim
*Undersander
Issues with grass• There’s great variation among grass species,
thus it’s difficult to make general statements about grasses– Re-growth characteristics, seasonal
distribution, response to cutting and fiber digestibility all vary
• Have been limited feeding studies in the USA• Best suggestion is probably to consider some
on-farm research and experiment with grasses on a small scale on your own farm
Getting Top Yield
and Quality
Maintain Proper Soil pH and Fertility
• Proper fertilization:
– Allows for good stand establishment
– Promotes growth
– Increases yield and quality
– Improves winter hardiness and stand persistence
– Improves ability to compete with weeds
– Strengthens disease and insect resistance
Soil pH and Fertility
• Have soils tested
• For Alfalfa lime fields to at least
pH 6.7-6.9
• Apply lime at least 12 months before
seeding
First-cutting alfalfa yield relative to soil pH
Pounds of nutrients removed per ton of alfalfa produced
Nutrient Dry Matter Removed (lbs/ton)
Phosphate (P205) 14Potash (K2O) 58Calcium (Ca) 30Magnesium (Mg) 6Sulfur (S) 6Boron (B) 0.08
Select the Best Varieties
• Cheap seed does not pay
• Look over University Trials
• Compare new varieties with ones
you’ve grown
• Select high-yielding varieties with
adequate winter survival and disease
resistance.
Forage Yield Relative to Quality
Yield is the most important component of profitability
• Fixed costs same regardless of yield– e.g. taxes, land costs, machinery
depreciation• Production costs similar• Harvesting costs similar
– Slightly higher for extra fuel and labor to harvest higher yield and haul to barn
Alfalfa Yield and Dollar Return from Wisconsin Green-Gold Program
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
2 4 6 8
Yield (t/a)
Dol
lar
Ret
urn
per
acre Profitability
increases with yield because fixed inputs remain constant and variable inputs increase only slightly as yield increases.
Yield of alfalfa as Stand Ages (% of 2nd year)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1(seedyr)
2 3 4 5 6 7
Age of Stand (Years)
Yiel
d (%
of 2
nd Y
ear)
4th year11% decline
5th year27% decline
*Undersander
Good Hay Making Practices:
Reason Benefit
Allow full day’s drying
• Faster drop in moisture• Less respiration loss• Less likelihood of rain damage
1. Mow Forage Early in Day
Good Hay Making Practices:
Reason Benefit
Increase drying rate
• Faster drop in moisture• Less respiration loss• Less likelihood of rain damage• Higher quantity and quality
2. Form into Wide Swath
Good Hay Making Practices:
Reason Benefit
Increase drying rate
• Faster drop in moisture• Less respiration loss• Less likelihood of rain damage• Less leaf shatter • Higher quantity and quality
3. Rake at 40-50% Moisture Content
Good Hay Making Practices:
Reason Benefit
Optimize preservation
• Less leaf shatter• Inhibits molds and browning• Low chance of fire• Higher quantity and quality
4. Bale Hay at 18-20% Moisture Content
Good Hay Making Practices:
Reason Benefit
Protect from rain, sun
• Inhibits molds and browning• Less loss from rain damage• Higher quantity and quality
5. Store Hay Under Cover
Hay Storage
• If not considering cost, under roof is
the best option
• If outside, cover with tarps and get off
soil by placing on pad, crushed rock or?
Forage Web Page
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/teamforage/index.html
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/cwas/