how to talk about books we have not read
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 How To Talk About Books We Have Not Read
1/6
How To Talk About Books We Have Not Read
By Ian R Thorpe
One of the criticisms levelled at my articles about books by commenters on the
web is that I do not know how to write a proper review. The web attracts every kind
of pedant under the sun however and what my critics mean is I do not frame my
comments about books Ive read as one would if submitting a high school homework
assignment. I like to think my readers are grown ups and dont need me to
demonstrate an understanding of the niceties of style and grammar, narrative structure
and character creation techniques. They want to know if they might enjoy a certain
book or what ideas and themes they might find in it. People who do comment on my
writing as if they are a teacher grading it usually get a very rude but grammatically
and syntactically correct response.
A book that told me by its title I had to post an article on it was How To Talk
About Books You Havent Read by Pierre Bayard. Now if an English writer had
written this, it might have been titled The Art Of Talking Bollocks.
Bollocks is not a word that has much currency in
the U.S.A. so I can use it with impunity even though it
is a slightly rude, reference to mens dangly bits. The
word means literally small balls and in modern
usage refers to the aforementioned components of the
male anatomy. Although religious types may deem any
mention of the human body parts between the navel
and knee socially unacceptable, the first recorded use of the word bollocks is
The Dog's Bollocks
So many books, so little time
-
7/29/2019 How To Talk About Books We Have Not Read
2/6
ecclesiastical. One of King Henry 1sts spies, sent to Canterbury to get the dirt on
Thomas a Becket noted in a report to the king, The Dean and Chapter walked past
chanting plainsong and playing with their bollocks. Without doubt he was referring
to rosary beads. Bollocks is usually used colloquially to describe something that fails
to meet expectations, as in That novel was a load of bollocks, or I dont listen to
politicians, they all talk bollocks. A meal that is bollocks is on the inedible side of
mediocre. On the other hand, something that is the dogs bollocks is surpassing
good.
The American mindset tends to take things more literally that that of most
Europeans, especially British and French minds, both of which are equally open to
the ideas of existentialism and fascinated with wordplay and irony, thus the idea of
talking about books we have not read might seem, to an American reader, quite
nonsensical while a European would see a lot of potentially interesting possibilities in
it. Before reviewing How To Talk About Books We Have Not Read by Pierre Bayard,
a French Literary Academic, I must first explain the wholly British concept of talking
bollocks (it is only British in that the French have their own name for it.) to help
readers understand the concept.
As well as referring to someone who talks through the hole in their bottom,
talking bollocks also describes a peculiarly Celtic and Anglo Saxon art form art
form. In Ireland this art of having a free flowing, desultory and not entirely serious
conversation is also known as Craic. For those who take life too seriously, craic or
talking bollocks is a wonderfully entertaining way of passing an evening.
Talking about books in an intellectual way is an aspect of this art, in fact I have a
degree in talking bollocks about books, a.k.a. English Literature.
We have all at times told porkies (abbrev.
Pork Pies, rhyming slang for lies) about reading,
claiming to have read books we have not so
much as opened and in some cases not even read
the blurb on the dust cover. Usually this is done
to impress somebody, a colleague or someone we An honest pork pie
http://www.cockneyrhymingslang.co.uk/http://www.cockneyrhymingslang.co.uk/ -
7/29/2019 How To Talk About Books We Have Not Read
3/6
fancy. I wonder how many red blooded men (and maybe a few women) in have
claimed to have read everything Oscar Wilde or the French Romantic poets ever
wrote to impress a certain somebody with whom they wanted to spend quality time.
Pierre Bayard acknowledges that his interest in Talking About Books He Has Not
Read is professional, as an academic and teacher in a University he is often required
to comment on books he has not read. There are far too many books existing in any
major language for one person to have read them all. This led Bayard to understand
there is a difference between simple absence of reading and the act of not reading as a
cultural activity.
The distinction the author makes is perhaps more noticeable in France where
intellectualism is still prized, than in the English speaking world where dumbing
down and rampant consumerism have conspired to turn bookish people into
distrusted outsiders in our materialistic, property owning democratic societies.
Not Reading as opposed to simply not reading is more complex than simple
laziness or lack of interest in the life of the mind; it implies a deep interest in books
and literature. The true reader, the book claims, is someone who loves to reflect on
literature and to hold an opinion on the ideas that are the essence of any book. In this
the author is thinking along the same lines as Oscar Wilde who believed the critic
relies neither on author or text. Wilde was proposing the idea that a reader must be
creative, must engage with the text in order to interpret it in a personally meaningful
way and therefore must become a part of the creative process as is the writer. To read
it is necessary to interpret and to interpret is to write. Wilde would certainly not have
felt his not having read a book constrained his right to express an opinion.
The central theme of Talking about Books We Have Not Read stems from the
philosophical writing of existentialist philosopher Jaques Derrida. Derrida says text
focuses on objects and the systems that support them. Here books are these
supporting systems, only important in society in that they are the vehicles for ideas;
their real importance to society lies in the conversations they generate and the
exchange of ideas that take place in those conversations.
Relations between ideas are much more important than the ideas themselves,
-
7/29/2019 How To Talk About Books We Have Not Read
4/6
Bayard asserts.
To put this in perspective we need to reflect on how subjective our interpretations
of the events in daily life are and compare that with the subjectivity of our
interpretations of the books we read. Is it the case then that Bayard and Derrida were
supporting solipsism, the idea that an individuals mind is the only thing that person
can truly know exists? Do we all live in a private universe of our own creation? Not
quite.
The value of solipsism is put into perspective by two founders of the existentialist
way of thinking. David Hume said There are no great, universal truths, each mans
perceptions are uniquely his own they did not go in for inclusive nouns in Humes
era while Immanuel Kant said Objects exist in reality but only a human mind can
surround them with time and space.
We share a reality then but each perceive it in slightly different, subjective ways.
In illustrating his point, Prof. Bayard repeatedly misrepresents vital plot elements in
books by Umberto Eco, John Updike, Graham Greene and others. If challenged, he
informs us, he will simply say that he was telling a subjective truth. Culture, he tells
us, is a theatre charged with concealing individual ignorance.
In that joke Bayard sums up the tone of his work, it is playful and tongue in
cheek, as if he has played a deliciously naughty trick on more serious minded
intellectuals. It is in fact a perfect example of Talking Bollocks although to qualify as
Jerrida talking bollocks with a colleague.
-
7/29/2019 How To Talk About Books We Have Not Read
5/6
craic it would need others involved in the conversation while a book is essentially a
dialogue between the words of the author and the mind of the reader.
He could be right, but what price would we pay for tearing down that theatre. Are
we already paying that price as we bulldoze cultural centres to make way for
shopping malls and other Temples of Mammon.
How To Talk About Books You Have Not Read has a deliciously French feel to it,
indeed it could probably only have been written by a French author. The tone is witty
and thought provoking but underlying all the intellectual trickery is a serious point,
We must transform our relationship with books and with ideas.
Often however, when the word book appears in the text it could easily be
substituted by experience and to prove he is not a charlatan the writer offers
insightful analysis of writers such as Proust, Balzac and Shakespeare as well as a
critique of Groundhog Day.
Though prone to complicate the obvious he should never be taken at face value,
Pierre Bayard is truly multi layered. But of course that is my subjective interpretation
of the book. You must judge for yourselves. How To Talk About Books We Havent
Read is well worth a read.
(True to the spirit of Pierre Bayards book Ian reviewed it without having read it.).
An impressionists view of people talking about books they
have not read in Montmartre
-
7/29/2019 How To Talk About Books We Have Not Read
6/6
RELATED POSTS:
The Intellectual Elite Truly Despise People They Pretend To Care About
Brain In A Bottle, Thinking Machine, Matrix, Custard, Weird History of Ideas
About the Brain And ConsciousnessQuantum Soul: Is Each Of Us A Part Of The Universe
Getting Started With Existentialism (part 1)
Can Your Body Sense Future Events Without Any External Clue?
The Agenda: How An International Elite Are Destroying Sovereign Nations
The Slow Murder Of Democracy By Mainstream Media
The International Elite's Contempt For National Sovereignty
Philo and Sophia
Meet the author
http://www.scribd.com/doc/120495780/Intellectuals-Have-Always-despised-The-Masseshttp://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981811620http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981811620http://www.greenteethmm.com/quantum-soul.shtmlhttp://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewarticle.asp?id=67446&authorid=3523http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-presentiment.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/global-elite.htmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/democracy-media-murder.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/interntional-elite.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/philosophia.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/biography-intro.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/philosophia.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/biography-intro.shtmlhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/120495780/Intellectuals-Have-Always-despised-The-Masseshttp://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981811620http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981811620http://www.greenteethmm.com/quantum-soul.shtmlhttp://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewarticle.asp?id=67446&authorid=3523http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-presentiment.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/global-elite.htmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/democracy-media-murder.shtmlhttp://www.greenteethmm.com/interntional-elite.shtml