how to use the european pharmacopoeia and how to contribute · how to use the european...
TRANSCRIPT
How to use the European Pharmacopoeia and how to contribute
18th European Symposium on Radiopharmacy and Radiopharmaceuticals
Ellen Pel, Scientific Officer
European Pharmacopoeia DepartmentEuropean Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM)
Outline
• Purpose of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.)• Place of the Ph. Eur. in the regulatory network• General principles – general organisation• Elaboration of Ph. Eur. Texts• Setting of limits• Opportunities for you to contribute to the Ph.Eur.
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Mihaela Buda ©2015 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
The purpose of the European Pharmacopoeia is to promote public health by the provision of recognised common standards for the quality of medicines and their components. Such standards are to be appropriate as a basis for the safe use of medicines by patients.
Introduction
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Place of the Ph. Eur. within the regulatory network
Ø Lays down common, compulsory quality standards for all medicinal products in Europe.
Ø Mandatory on the same date in 37 states (CoE) and the EU.
Ø The Ph. Eur. is legally binding. The legislation also includes a mechanism to provide the pharmacopoeia authority with information on the quality of products on the market;
Ø The European Pharmacopoeia needs to keep pace Ø with the regulatory needs of licensing, control and inspection authorities
in the public health area, Ø with technological and scientific advances, and with industrial constraints.
Ph. Eur. – General organisation
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
………..
Introduction
General notices
General chapters
General monographs
Individual monographs
Ph. Eur. – General organisation
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
………..
§ apply to all monographs and other texts of the Ph. Eur.
§ instructions to understand texts, conventional expressions
§ essential reading before starting to use general chapters and monographs
Introduction
1. General notices
General chapters
General monographs
Individual monographs
Flexibility in the Ph. Eur. – Alternative methods
“The tests and assays described are the official methods upon which the standards of the Pharmacopoeia are based. With the agreement of the competent authority, alternative methods of analysis may be used for control purposes, provided that the methods used enable an unequivocal decision to be made as to whether compliance with the standards of the monographs would be achieved if the official methods were used. In the event of doubt or dispute, the methods of analysis of the Pharmacopoeia are alone authoritative.”General Notices
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Ø Ph. Eur. tests are reference methods, essential in cases of dispute.
Ø Compliance is required, but alternative methods may be used as long as they lead to the same pass/fail result.
Ø It is the responsibility of the user to demonstrate their suitability. Approval of the competent authority is necessary in many cases.
Flexibility in the Ph. Eur. – Waiving of tests
“An article is not of Pharmacopoeia quality unless it complies with all the requirements stated in the monograph. This does not imply that performance of all the tests in a monograph is necessarily a prerequisite for a manufacturer in assessing compliance with the Pharmacopoeia before release of a product. The manufacturer may obtain assurance that a product is of Pharmacopoeia quality from data derived, for example, from validation of the process and from validation studies of the manufacturing process and from in-process control”.
General Notices (3rd Edition to Supplement 8.1)
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Ph. Eur. – General organisation
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
………..
Introduction
General notices
General chapters
General monographs
Individual monographs
2 - Methods of analysis
2.2.66 – Detection andmeasurement of radioactivity
Reference in the General Monograph ofRadiopharmaceutical Preparations:
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Ph. Eur. – General organisation
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
………..
Introduction
General notices
General chapters
General monographs
Individual monographs
2 - Methods of analysis3 - Materials for containers
and containers4 - Reagents5 - General texts
Ph. Eur. – General organisation
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
………..
Introduction
General notices
General chapters
General monographs
Individual monographs
2 - Methods of analysis3 - Materials for containers
and containers4 - Reagents5 - General texts
5.19 – Extemporaneouspreparation ofradiopharmaceuticals
Example of a general text
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Ph. Eur. – General organisation
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
………..
Introduction
General notices
General chapters
General monographs
Individual monographs
23 general monographs + Dosage forms monographsin Ph. Eur. 8.8
- Pharmaceutical preparations- Radiopharmaceutical
preparations- Parenteral preparations- Chemical precursors for
radiopharmaceuticalpreparations
...
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Ph. Eur. – General organisation
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
………..
Introduction
General notices
General chapters
General monographs
Individual monographs
More than 2500 monographs- Chemicals- Herbals- Antibiotics- Biologicals- Vaccines- Fats- Radiopharmaceuticals- ….
Elaboration of monographs (1):- Ideally monographs cover the preparations used all over
Europe, produced by different routes of synthesis. - Individual routes are not explicitly mentioned in a monograph,
but a hint to the routes examined during the elaboration mightbe given in the knowledge database.
- Knowledge about the routes of synthesis, starting materials, intermediates, by-products, degradants (potential impurities/efficiency of the purification procedure) is needed.
=> Input from producers is crucialwww.edqm.eu
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Elaboration of monographs (2)Preparation having a marketing authorisation
- Specifications and tests are based upon those of the marketed preparations.
- But specifications can be different, in case batch data support this and if thereis no objection from e.g. efficacy or(radio)toxicological side.
- Validation data are examined. Methodsare validated in case of changes.
- Methods are experimentally verified.
Preparation without a marketing authorisation
Note: it is exceptional that mono-graphs are elaborated on substances/ preparations not already authorised in at least one Ph. Eur. member state.
- Elaboration often „from scratch“.
- Methods are developed and validated.
- Limits are based upon efficacy, toxicology considerations and analyticalmethod capabilities and supported bybatch data.
- Methods are verified in a secondlaboratory.
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Basis for limit setting• Authorised specifications• Batch data of frequently used preparations• Toxicology data• Efficacy data• Analytical method capabilities
Quality systems. The quality standards represented by monographs are valid only where the articles in question are produced within the framework of a suitable quality system. The quality system must assure that the articles consistently meet the requirements of the Pharmacopoeia.
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Example for limits: Alovudine (18F) injection
Limits: in the chromatogram obtained with the spectrophotometer:
– alovudine: not more than the area of the corresponding peak in the chromatogram obtained with reference solution (a) (0.1 mg/V);
– impurity C: not more than the area of the corresponding peak in the chromatogram obtained with reference solution (b) (0.1 mg/V);
– any other impurity: for each impurity, not more than the area of the principal peak in the chromatogram obtained with reference solution (a) (0.1 mg/V);
– total: not more than 5 times the area of the principal peak in the chromatogram obtained with reference solution (a) (0.5 mg/V);
– disregard limit: 0.3 times the area of the principal peak in the chromatogram obtained with reference solution (a) (0.03 mg/V).
Pass/fail decision
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Participating in the work of theEuropean Pharmacopoeia
https://www.edqm.eu/Knowledge-Database-707.html
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Participating in the work of theEuropean Pharmacopoeia
Knowledge database: example of additional information
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
Contributions depend on state of work
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
State of work
0 No draft available
1 Draft available to the experts
2 Draft published in Pharmeuropa
3 Draft will be presented to the Ph.Eur. Commission
4 Draft adoped by the Ph.Eur. Commission
5 Monograph is published
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.
http://pharmeuropa.edqm.eu/home/
Participating in the work of theEuropean Pharmacopoeia
Thank you very much!
Ellen Pel ©2016 EDQM, Council of Europe. All rights reserved.