hsn indicators

51
HSN Indicators HSN Indicators School Aged Children School Aged Children August, 2003 August, 2003

Upload: ophrah

Post on 18-Mar-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

HSN Indicators. School Aged Children August, 2003. Statistical Fact. Ten percent of all car thieves are left-handed ; All polar bears are left-handed ; If your car is stolen, there's a 10 percent chance it was stolen by a Polar bear. Survey data. Community Foundation Survey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HSN Indicators

HSN IndicatorsHSN IndicatorsSchool Aged ChildrenSchool Aged Children

August, 2003August, 2003

Page 2: HSN Indicators

Statistical Fact

• Ten percent of all car thieves are left-handed ; All polar bears are left-handed ; If your car is stolen, there's a 10 percent chance it was stolen by a Polar bear

Page 3: HSN Indicators

Survey data• Community Foundation Survey• Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS)• Search Institute Student Survey

Page 4: HSN Indicators

Community Foundation SurveySource: Hillsdale County Community

Foundation Youth Needs Assessment-2003

• The Hillsdale County Community Foundation Youth Needs Assessment compiled in the spring of 2003, had Hillsdale County teens ranking 23 “issues” on a scale from “serious” to “not a problem”.

• There were 735 students surveyed; 428 7th grade, 171 9th grade and 136 11th grade students.

• Overall 57% of students surveyed saw a serious/moderate problem in dealing with stress.

• 53% of students surveyed felt dealing with death of family or friend was a serious/moderate problem faced by teens.

Page 5: HSN Indicators

Community Foundation Survey continued…

Source: HCCF 2003 Youth Needs Assessment

The following are the top 4 issues reported, by grade 7th 9th 11th

Stress Stress Drug use Death Death Peer Pressure Divorce Drug use Alcohol use Drug use Hygiene Stress

• Note the change between drug use and stress from 7th to 11th grade.

• Peer pressure in 11th grade was the only item with more than 40% of respondents rating it as a serious issue (51%)

Page 6: HSN Indicators

Comparison of grade 11 students engaging in substance abuse risk

behaviors within the last 30 days, 1999-2001 YRBS

Source: Youth Risk Behavior Survey

53 5146 47

40 36

2628 28 27

24 24

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Perc

enta

ge

Alcohol Tobacco Marijuana

MI-99US-99MI-01US-01

Page 7: HSN Indicators

Percentage of grade 11 studentsusing alcohol

Source: 1999-2001 YRBS

53 5146.2 47.1

34 31 32.1 30.7

18 1612.9

13.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Perc

enta

ge

Drank past 30 Days Rode with Drinker Drove after Drinking

MI-99US-99MI-01US-01

Page 8: HSN Indicators

% of Grade 10 Hillsdale and grade 10 MI/US students who drank alcohol, last

30 daysSource: 2002 Hillsdale Search Institute Study &

2001YRBS

36

44.2 45.2

05

101520253035404550

Perc

enta

ge

HD Grade 10 MI Grade 10 US Grade 10

Page 9: HSN Indicators

Percentage of grade 10 students using tobacco

Source: 2001YRBS & 2002 Search Institute Study- Hillsdale

24.3 23.9

2925.7

28.5

2217.7

19.4

16

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Perc

enta

ge

Smoked Last 30 days Smoked Regularly Used Smokeless

MIUSHD

Page 10: HSN Indicators

Arrests for narcotic law violations

adolescents (age 6-18) 2001Source: MSP Uniform Crime Report 2001

5

0 0

0

5

10

15

20

25

Marijuana Synthetics Amphetamines

2001

Page 11: HSN Indicators

Additional Information: Selling tobacco to minors

• Prevention Partners is the designated Youth Tobacco Use representative (DYTUR) for our area.

• In 2002/3 and 2003/4 they will visit all 76 tobacco vendors to do checks for compliance with the Michigan Youth Tobacco Act.

• In addition to these visits, they will again conduct vendor education for compliance requirements.

Page 12: HSN Indicators

Compliance check results – Tobacco sales to minorsHillsdale County 2002

Source: Mid-south Substance Abuse Commission

12

2

29

6

25

5

14

4

26

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

January February March April May

2002

CheckedSold to minor

Page 13: HSN Indicators

Teen Pregnancy

Page 14: HSN Indicators

Hillsdale County - Teen birthsSource: MDCH Vital Statistics

37

74

111

31

74

105

26

59

85

30

77

107

27

53

80

31

55

86

26

57

83

14

59

73

22

41

63

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Age 15-17Age 18-19Total Teen

Page 15: HSN Indicators

Number of teen pregnancies *Hillsdale County

(*estimated – includes estimates for pregnancy ending in abortion)

Source: MDCH Vital Statistics

48

110

157

48

104

152

41

85

126

50

112

163

42

82

125

52

79

131

33

74

110

23

79

102

30

56

86

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Age 15-17Age 18-19Total Teen

Page 16: HSN Indicators

Abortion rates – Hillsdale County vs. Michigan – 1994-2002

Source: Michigan Department of Community Health birth files

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Rate

/1,0

00

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

HillsdaleMichigan

Page 17: HSN Indicators

Abortions by age of mother – Hillsdale County 2002

Source: Michigan Department of Community Health birth files

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Perc

ent

< 20 20- 24 25- 29 30- 34 35- 39 40+

Hillsdale County abortions 2002 - 46

HillsdaleMI

Page 18: HSN Indicators

Teen pregnancy rate per 1,000 Hillsdale County

Source: MDCH Vital Statistics

49

158

88 88

48

159

40

113

50

105

32

98

23

100

29

71

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Age 15-17Age 18-19

Page 19: HSN Indicators

Additional Information:(Percentage of Parents Attending Parent

Teacher Conferences)• ISD/School age workgroup to lead data

collection efforts with local districts• HSN School Age Workgroup has a survey

that may capture this information.• There was some discussion about

capturing the number of expulsions from the schools as well as parent-teacher information.

Page 20: HSN Indicators

Schools

Page 21: HSN Indicators

Measures students' knowledge and achievement in five areas: math, reading, science, social studies, and writing. Michigan's MEAP tests are based on the Model Core Curriculum Outcomes and the Content Standards approved by the Michigan State Board of Education. Michigan's MEAP tests results are reported as performance against a standard. Performance is judged according to whether or not the student has met the achievement standard. The MEAP test is the only common measure given statewide to all students. It is important to keep in mind that a MEAP score is only one achievement measure at one point in time. MEAP results should be considered along with other achievement measures, and should be viewed in local context.

MEAP – A FOUR LETTER WORD?Michigan Educational Assessment Program

Page 22: HSN Indicators

MEAP Results• Due to changes in the MEAP in the

past 5 years, trend data is merely impossible. The following data represents 2002 results for multiple grades. Additionally, only the 8 public school districts are shown, however they represent approximately 7,090 of the 7,400 school students in public schools in Hillsdale County. Private school data is not included.

Page 23: HSN Indicators

4th Grade- Hillsdale County, 2002 Math/Reading MEAP scores- passing

% Source: Standard & Poor’s School Evaluation

Services

0

20

40

60

80

Perc

ent

pass

ing

Math Reading

HillsdaleMichigan

Page 24: HSN Indicators

5th Grade – Hillsdale County, 2002Science/Social Studies/ Writing MEAP

scores- passing % Source: Standard & Poor’s School Evaluation

Services

0

20

40

60

80

Perc

ent

pass

ing

Science Soc. Stud Writing

HillsdaleMichigan

Page 25: HSN Indicators

7th Grade –Hillsdale County, 2002Reading/Writing MEAP scores-

passing% Source: Standard & Poor’s School Evaluation

Services

0

20

40

60

80

Perc

ent

pass

ing

Reading Writing

HillsdaleMichigan

Page 26: HSN Indicators

8th Grade –Hillsdale County, 2002 Math/Science/Social Studies

MEAP scores- passing % Source: Standard & Poor’s School Evaluation

Services

0

20

40

60

80

Perc

ent

pass

ing

Math Science Soc. Stud

HillsdaleMichigan

Page 27: HSN Indicators

11th Grade – Hillsdale County, 2002 Math/Reading/Science/Social

Studies/Writing MEAP scores- passing % Source: Standard & Poor’s School Evaluation

Services

0102030405060

Perc

ent

pass

ing

Math Reading Science Soc. Stud Writing

HillsdaleMichigan

Page 28: HSN Indicators

Graduating class 2002 –Hillsdale County, 2002 Math/Reading/Science/Social

Studies/Writing MEAP scores- passing %Source: Standard & Poor’s School Evaluation

Services

01020304050607080

Perc

ent

pass

ing

Math Reading Science Soc. Stud Writing Overall

HillsdaleMichigan

Page 29: HSN Indicators

Graduation Rates• The Michigan Department of

Education uses graduation rates to estimate the percentage of grade 9 students who complete and graduate from high school. This is computed by multiplying the 4 retention rates for grades 9-12. Retention rates are the district dropout rate subtracted from 100.

Page 30: HSN Indicators

High School graduation rate Hillsdale County schools

Source: Michigan Center for Educational Performance and Information

0102030405060708090

100

1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02

County AverageMI rate

Page 31: HSN Indicators

High school dropout rate Hillsdale County

Source: Michigan Center for Educational Performance and Information

6.15.2 4 4.4

5.7

44.8

3.7 3.4 3.2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02

County Ave.MI Rate

Page 32: HSN Indicators

Special Education by diagnosis,1989 to 2002 – Hillsdale County

(This data includes ages 0 to 26)Source: Hillsdale County ISD

Category % Hillsdale 1989

% Hillsdale 2002

% MI 1989

% MI 2001

Mild cognitive 14.3 11.5 8.3 8.5 Moderate Cog. 3.3 2.0 3.7 2.5 Severe cog. 1.5 1.0 1.4 .7 Emotional 5.6 5.5 11.4 8.4 Autistic .9 2.6 .6 2.4 Learning/disabled 42 40 41 41 Hearing/impaired 1.6 1.0 1.7 1.4 Visually/impaired .5 .2 .5 .4 Physical/impaired 3.4 6.4 3.4 7.2 Multiply/impaired 1.3 2.3 1.7 1.7 Early child develop. delay

2.3 9.1 1.3 1.7

Speech/language impaired

23.4 18.4 25 24.1 3

Page 33: HSN Indicators

Abuse and neglect

Page 34: HSN Indicators

Hillsdale County FIA record of referrals studied and those substantiated, 1995-

2001, youth under 18

Source: FIA Annual Report (CPS)

572

10196

562

98 111

549

158

101

22

527

123122

21

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Num

ber

1998 1999 1999/2000 2000/01

Year

Studied

SubstantiatedReferred

Children removed

Page 35: HSN Indicators

Hillsdale County FIA Foster Care, youth under 18,

1995-2002 quarterly averages, Source: FIA Web site

4842 45 43

59

17

37

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Num

ber

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Calendar Year

Page 36: HSN Indicators

Number of children 6-18 involved in people seeking

shelter for domestic violence - Hillsdale

• Prior to 2002 Domestic Harmony violence data was not broken out by age into 0 to 5 and 6 to 18 subgroups. 2002 data is further broken down by age.

Page 37: HSN Indicators

Number of children ages 0 to 18 housed by Domestic Violence Shelter, 1996-2002 - Hillsdale

Source: Domestic Harmony

48 4855 55

64

89

53

36

0102030405060708090

100

Num

ber

1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02

Children-allChildren 6-18Children 0-5

Page 38: HSN Indicators

Number of resident nights provided for children ages 0 to 18 by

Domestic Violence Shelter, 1996-2002 - Hillsdale

Source: Domestic Harmony

1331

545

1059

762 711

1388

832

556

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Num

ber

1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02

Children- allChildren 6-18Children 0-5

Page 39: HSN Indicators

Additional Information: domestic violence victims

Source: Michigan State Police Crime data

According to the crime reports issued by the Michigan State Police there were:

• 292 victims of domestic violence in Hillsdale in 2001. This included 17 children ages 6-18– 240 victims in 1999 which included 32

children ages 9 to 19.

Page 40: HSN Indicators

Juvenile Court(some basics)

• Step 1- Preliminary hearing – screen out cases not needing to go before Juvenile court judge (first time offenders, minor offenses). These minors are included in the number of juveniles under the jurisdiction of the court.

• Step 2 -Adjudication – case goes before judge. Status determined. Investigation activated to determine course of action.

• Step 3 - Disposition – Judge decides course of action (sentence) for juvenile offender/family.

Page 41: HSN Indicators

Total minors under the court jurisdiction, 1998-2001Source: Hillsdale County Juvenile Court

438

140

367

201

580

232

747

190

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

1998 1999 2000 2001

DelinquencyChild Protection

Page 42: HSN Indicators

Juvenile Court Disposition terms

• Delinquency – juvenile criminal activity, example: shoplifting, vandalism

• Status – criminal activity of minor due to their age (status). Examples include runaways, smoking, truancy, dropout.

• Neglect – often includes more than 1 child. Example: If a parent of 4 abuses 1 child, all 4 would come under court jurisdiction.

Page 43: HSN Indicators

Juvenile Court petitions disposed, 1998-2002

Source: Hillsdale County Juvenile Court

290

74 55

310

53 72

356

8358

368

65

27

300

5821

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

DelinquencyStatusNeglect

Page 44: HSN Indicators

Personal protection petitions filed, Juvenile Court, 1999 to

2002 (Due to reporting disparities, this represent

approximately ½ of all cases) Source: Hillsdale Co. Prosecuting Attorney

11

21

1311

0

5

10

15

20

25

Num

ber

1999 2000 2001 2002

Page 45: HSN Indicators

Percentage of children in extracurricular activities

Source: Community Foundation Survey- 2000

Community Foundation Survey in the winter of 2000 asked 168 seventh graders and 129 eleventh grade students, “Are you active in extracurricular activities?” 67% of the 7th graders and 63% of the 11th graders said yes.

Page 46: HSN Indicators

Hillsdale youth – 8th and 10th grade extra curricular activity

Source: Search Institute Study – March 2002

01020304050607080

Perc

ent

0 hour

s1 h

our

2 hour

s

> 2 ho

urs

Club/Organization

Community Service

Page 47: HSN Indicators

Economics – show me the money !!

Page 48: HSN Indicators

Percentage of children receiving free or reduced lunches, Hillsdale ISD/Michigan percents

Source: Michigan Department of Education Web site

29 32 29 32 31 32 3031

3231

3532

05

101520253035404550

Perc

enta

ge

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

School Year

ISD %MI %

Page 49: HSN Indicators

Poverty Estimates for Hillsdale Children Age 5 to

17Source: 2000 U.S. Census

1990 1993 1995 1997

2000 2000 Michigan

Total Children 5-18

8685 9256 9276 9591 8947 1,887,554

Number in Poverty

1212 1666 1345 1573 857 250,271

Percentage in Poverty

14.0% 18.0% 14.5% 16.4% 9.6% 13.3%

Page 50: HSN Indicators

2003 U.S. Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines

Source: U.S. Department of Human Services website

# in Family Unit Poverty Threshold

1 $8,9802 $12,120

3 $15,2604 $18,4005 $21,5406 $24,6807 $27,8208 $30,960

Page 51: HSN Indicators

Poverty breakdown – Households with children under

18 years Hillsdale CountySource: U.S. Census 2000

441 197

4525

42376 202

716

0500

100015002000250030003500400045005000

Total Families Married Dad only Mom only

In PovertyNot in Poverty