hull development framework

42
HDF Hull Development Framework Hull Character Study (Phase 1) Draft March 2010

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jan-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hull Development Framework

HDFHull Development Framework

Hull Character Study(Phase 1)

DraftMarch 2010

Page 2: Hull Development Framework
Page 3: Hull Development Framework

HULL CHARACTER STUDY

1. Introduction

• Urban Characterisation • Characterisation in Hull • Methodology • Consultation

2. Landscape Setting of Hull

• Geology, Soil and Topography • Rivers and Drainage • Land use • Vistas • Connections

3. Historic Evolution of Hull

• Medieval and Pre-1800 • 19th and Early 20th Centuries (1800 – 1919) • Inter War Years (1919 – 1945) • Post War Years (1945 – 1980) • Post 1980s

4. Overall Character of Hull

5. Townscape Types and Character Areas

6. Townscape Types Assessment Sources Appendix 1: Participation and Informal Consultation Appendix 2: Informal Consultation – Comments Received

Page 4: Hull Development Framework

1. INTRODUCTION Urban Characterisation Historic landscape characterisation is an established technique, promoted by English

Heritage, to assist with managing change to the environment. It is particularly useful in spatial

planning and land management. The first projects were undertaken in largely rural areas but it

is now being extended into urban areas. Characterisation produces a generalised

understanding of how landscapes and places have evolved over time and how their historic

character can be appreciated. It is concerned with the context and character of places rather

than with individual sites and buildings. Characterisation therefore differs from conservation

area appraisal, but is complementary to it.

Every landscape and place has a historic character, largely determined by inherited features

such as fields, hedges, streets, buildings and place names. Understanding this character is a

starting point for deciding a place’s future, the first step in determining how places can be

improved for the future. All regeneration and development is set within an inherited landscape

and the most successful designs are those that recognise and capitalise on this.

Characterisation takes place early in the planning and design process and provides a

framework for early decisions. It opens up heritage and its management to varied and multiple

viewpoints, personal as well as specialist, and is open to absorbing and responding to

community views. It enables a place’s historical identity to contribute to everyone’s quality of

life.

Characterisation in Hull

Like most towns and cities, Hull does not have a uniform character but is made up of distinct

areas of different ages and building types. The purpose of the Hull Character Study is to

identify, describe and analyse the combination of elements that help to form the character of

different areas within the city. It aims to identify what is distinctive about local character areas

and what makes them different from neighbouring areas, and to highlight the strengths and

weaknesses that regeneration and development can build upon or redress. Although

‘character’ is primarily defined in terms of the built environment, it is important to recognise

that it is largely the interplay of physical, economic and social factors that has given rise to the

form of the built environment. Physical factors are explored in Chapter 2, and economic and

social factors in Chapter 3. All factors are considered together in Chapter 4. The study will

form part of the LDF evidence base and inform policies and SPDs in the LDF.

The Character Study will be comprised of three sections, as follows:

Page 5: Hull Development Framework

• firstly, a context section describing the landscape setting of Hull and the historic

evolution of the city; this is followed by an analysis of the overall character of the

city in terms of its built form;

• secondly, a generic townscape assessment that identifies broad townscape types

based on land use and age of development; and

• thirdly, character area assessments that examine localities in more detail and at a

citywide level, the identification of key views.

The study is being carried out in two phases, with the first two sections – a largely desk-based

exercise – presented here in draft form, and the third section – which involves extensive

fieldwork – to follow later in the year.

Methodology The methodology adopted is based upon that promoted by English Heritage and adapted for

use in urban areas such as Oxford, Brighton & Hove and Plymouth.

The first part of the context section is concerned with the landscape setting of Hull and

includes features such as: geology, soil, topography – flat; rivers – Humber and Hull, and

drains – Barmston and Holderness; land use – buildings, grassland, woods, fields; vistas –

across the Humber and to the Wolds; and connections – the main approaches by road,

railway and river.

The second part of the context section is concerned with the historic evolution of Hull and

covers the main phases of urban development and their characteristics, i.e: Medieval and

Pre-1800; 1800-1919 (19th and early 20th century); 1919-1945 (interwar); 1945-1980

(postwar); and Post-1980.

The generic townscape assessment identifies broad townscape types based on land use and

the age of development. The characteristics of each type are described and local character

areas within each type are identified. The locations of the townscape types are shown on a

map. 19 townscape types have been identified and 58 character areas,

The final part of the study, which has yet to be carried out, will be a detailed assessment of

the local character areas and citywide, the identification of important views.

Consultation This first phase of the study has been subject to participation and informal consultation. This

took place during 2009 and included:

• workshop sessions with CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built

Environment);

Page 6: Hull Development Framework

• discussion at the HDF (Hull Development Framework) Forum;

• events with Arc (Architecture Centre for Hull and the Humber Region); and

• informal consultation with relevant organisations

Changes were made to the process and document as a result of participation and informal

consultation, while other comments will be taken into account for the second phase of the

study. Details of participation and informal consultation are contained in Appendix 1 and

comments received during informal consultation are in Appendix 2.

Page 7: Hull Development Framework

2. Landscape setting of Hull

Geology, soil and topography

Kingston upon Hull lies near England’s east coast on relatively flat lowland, where the River

Hull meets the northern bank of the Humber Estuary, approximately 20 miles from the North

Sea. It is built on alluvial and glacial deposits which overlie chalk rocks, this chalk bedrock is

overlain by tills composed of loam, clays, sands and gravels. It is generally very flat, only 2 to

4 metres above sea level with some areas of the city lying on reclaimed land at or below sea

level. The predominant soil type is seasonally wet deep clay, which typically has a low

permeability, which means that rainfall runs off the surface rather than infiltrates into the soil.

Rivers and drainage

Lying at the juncture of the Humber Estuary and the River

Hull both rivers have had, and continue to have, a unique

influence on the city. The River Hull (left) has its source in the

Yorkshire Wolds and joins the Humber Estuary in the centre

of Hull. The current course of the river was originally just a

tributary of the main river which came out further to the west

along what is now Commercial Road. It was not until the

floods of 1250 that the course of the river changed to where it

is today. It receives salt water from the Humber Estuary and

so is therefore brackish (a mixture of sea water and fresh

water) throughout its length, yet it is still very important for

wildlife. Numerous bird species are known to breed along the river including the reed and

sedge warbler.

The Humber Estuary (right) makes up over 4% of the total

area of Hull and has the largest catchment of any estuary in

the British Isles and drains one-fifth of the land area of

England. The Humber starts at the juncture of the River Ouse

and the River Trent where it is approximately 1 mile wide. It

increases its width until at its mouth, 37 miles to the east, it is

about 8 miles wide between North Lincolnshire and Kilnsea,

East Yorkshire. The waters of this tidal estuary are heavily

laden with sediment which mainly comes from the eroding

boulder clay of the Holderness coast and gives it its distinctive brown appearance. The water

(despite its appearance) and associated habitats, including saltmarsh and reedbeds are

particularly important. The estuary itself is home to many species including grey seals and

lamprey and provides important nurseries for North Sea fish populations such as codling.

Over one third of the estuary is exposed as mud or sandflats at low tide. These intertidal flats

Page 8: Hull Development Framework

are of national and international importance for wildlife and support many species such as

wading birds from both Britain and Europe, including Dunlin, Redshank and Ringed Plover.

Open drains have long been a feature of Hull, as the city

was built upon marshland and relies on its many drains to

keep the land dry. The major surviving open land drains

are Beverley and Barmston Drain (constructed in 1809) in

the west of the city and Holderness Drain in the east. The

Beverley and Barmston Drain outfalls to the River Hull

approximately 1.5km upstream of the Humber while

Holderness Drain (above) discharges into the Humber. Both the major and minor land drains

provide important natural habitats for birds (Kingfishers are regularly seen) and support an

interesting variety of wild plants including arrowhead, meadowsweet and skullcap. These

bankside areas also provide a home for animals including harvest mice and water shrews.

Land use

Hull is the largest settlement in East Yorkshire, it is

not part of a greater conurbation, is largely self-

contained and independent from the agricultural

East Riding. The land use of the city is mainly urban

and developed, nearly 80% of Hull can be classed

as ‘built environment’ (man-made structures) (right).

Underused industrial land, demolition sites and land

awaiting development is a common form of open land in the city. Hull is a major commercial

port and a large area of the city is occupied by dockland. There are areas of grassland

(mostly neutral wet grassland), agricultural land, naturally vegetated urban land and industrial

land, including railway lines and

dockland which have ecological value

and support Hull’s biodiversity. Most

grassland in the city is semi –

improved or improved, this includes

land in use for agriculture (land on the

eastern boundary adjacent to

Bransholme) and areas used for

recreation, such as public parks,

sports pitches and golf courses. The

open space that public parks provide

in Hull is invaluable. A number of grand examples were developed in the Victorian period to

provide welcome relief from urban life. These include Pearson Park, East Park, West Park

and Pickering Park. Other grassland includes those associated with railways, waterways

Page 9: Hull Development Framework

(above) and roads, such as grass verges, central reservations and roundabouts. On the

western boundary (much of the land outside the administrative boundary of Hull but owned by

the city) are two excellent examples of old permanent pastures, at Priory Meadows and Snuff

Mill Fields. These have been maintained traditionally for over 100 years and are dominated by

wet grassland and contain temporarily filled hollows, ponds and ditches. Less than 3% of the

city comprises woodland.

Vistas

As Hull is generally flat and has a low built form the extent of the visual influence of the city is

limited to prominent man-made structures, such as the Croda Wind Turbine, the tower blocks

of Orchard Park and the Garths, Hull Royal Infirmary (Anlaby Road), Kingston House,

Brynmor Jones Library (University of Hull campus) and Sculcoates Chimney.

Views from Hull include the Yorkshire Wolds, Holderness and across the Humber. The Wolds

are a plateau of gently rolling chalkland dissected by steep-sided valleys which sweep round

in a wide crescent from Flamborough Head to the Humber. The Wolds’ highest point (at 246

metres) is near Garrowby Hill, while on the coast at Bempton and Flamborough the cliffs rise

up to 120 metres and a similar height is reached at Elloughton Wold less than 3 miles from

the Humber.

To the east of Hull, between the city and the North Sea coast is the gently undulating

landscape of Holderness and its vast expanses of

former saltmarshes (reclaimed since the 17th

century) forming the flat and open Sunk Island and

Cherry Cobb Sands. At the south eastern tip of

Holderness is Spurn Point. This is a 6km long

spindly peninsula of sand and shingle extending out

into the Humber, formed by the erosion of the

Holderness coast. It is formed by the natural

phenomenon called the ‘Longshore Drift’ – a 250

year round cycle of erosion. This region from the

village of Kilnsea to Spurn Point is now designated a

National Nature Reserve.

To the south are the unique high blue skies and

open views across the Humber Estuary, including

views of the clay pits and reedbeds at Far Ings

National Nature Reserve on the southern bank of the

river, the oil refinery at Salt End in the east and the impressive structure of the Humber Bridge

to the west. The Humber Bridge (above) is the fifth longest single span suspension bridge (at

2220 metres long) in the world, designed to cross the last major unbridged estuary in Britain

and opened in 1981.

Page 10: Hull Development Framework

Connections

Connections and access routes to Hull are important in creating perceptions of the city. The

principle road access is the M62 motorway/A63 link road, which is one of the main east coast

to west coast routes in northern England. It provides a link to the cities of Liverpool,

Manchester and Leeds, as well as the rest of the country via the motorway network. The

motorway itself ends several miles to the west of Hull and continues into the city via the A63

dual carriageway. The M62/A63 crosses an extensive area of low, flat farmland, with long

views in all directions. The Humber Bridge, just to the west of Hessle, provides access to the

south, principally Grimsby and Immingham, which lies approximately 15 miles further down

the Humber, and to Lincoln via the A15. The bridge provides dramatic views over the Humber

estuary and to Hull. Another important route is the A1079 via Beverley and across the Wolds

to York and the north.

Hull’s port provides key east coast passenger ferry and trade links via the Humber and North

Sea to Europe and the Baltic states.

Rail access is principally from the west with lines from Doncaster and Selby converging at

Gilberdyke then crossing the low, flat farmland to reach Hull. A secondary line follows the foot

of the Wolds to Beverley and Bridlington then through the Wolds to Scarborough.

Page 11: Hull Development Framework

3. Historic Evolution of Hull Medieval and Pre-1800 The name Kingston upon Hull is derived from the River Hull which bisects the city and

Edward I who renamed the original settlement of Wyke when he acquired it in 1293 from the

Abbey of Meaux. The advancement of the town and its status after 1293 culminated in the

royal charter of 1299, by which it was declared to be a royal borough and was granted various

liberties. Before the foundation of this settlement the site had been uninhabited and was part

of the hamlet of Myton. Wyke at this time was a small successful trading post supporting the

burgeoning wool trade.

Edward I (left) principally acquired it for its strategic location as

a supply port in the north of England, to use in his campaigns

against the Scottish.

The original street plan of the settlement was largely dictated

by the course of the River Hull and was based on a grid pattern

typical of new towns of the time. After the king’s acquisition

(within a century of its foundation) Hull had grown to a town of

about 60 households.

Edward II ordered the first fortification of Hull in 1321 when he

granted a license to build a ditch and wall around the town. It

has been estimated that around 4,700,000 bricks were used in

the wall’s construction (the largest medieval brick structure in

England). The only visible remains of these defences are the foundations of Beverley Gate

and a section of adjoining wall at the west end of Whitefrairgate.

By the start of the 14th Century, the port of Hull was the second largest port after London and

its position of importance was exemplified by the role of the De La Pole family who started off

in the wool trade and grew rich through money lending to the kings of England. Its prosperity

continued to grow and wealthy merchants built grand houses along the narrow High Street

adjoining their private wharfs and staithes on the River Hull. In 1440 the culmination of Hull’s

self-government saw the town given corporate and county status and it was greatly enlarged

by the addition of an area stretching 5 miles west of the town.

During the 15th Century foreign trade continued to be the foundation of Hull’s economy and its

uncertain course dictated the fluctuating fortunes of the town.

Page 12: Hull Development Framework

Hull’s position as a

garrison town and royal

arsenal was strengthened

in the 16th Century when

Henry VIII reviewed its

fortifications and ordered

two new blockhouses

(small forts) and several

other structures to be built

to protect the harbour,

(principally against a

possible French invasion)

and a citadel was added

in 1681 (left). These

fortifications restricted the expansion of the town and would later lead to issues of

overcrowding.

Hull continued to be an important port in the later middle ages. It exported lead and grain as

well as wool. Imports included cloth from the Netherlands, iron-ore from Sweden, oil seed

from the Baltic and timber from Riga and Norway – timber and oil seed continue to be major

imports through the present day ports. Trade with the Netherlands was particularly extensive

and this appears to have influenced the architectural style of the day. Hull had the

appearance of a Dutch town with its high brick walls, surrounding moat and gabled houses

along the banks of the River Hull.

The port suffered a decline in trade during the 16th and 17th centuries but its strategic

importance meant it received the military attentions of both sides in the British civil wars. In

April 1642 King Charles I attempted to take control of the arsenal in the town but was turned

away from the gates by the governor Sir John Hotham. Hull supported the Parliamentarian

side in the conflict and was consequently besieged by the Royalists for five weeks in 1643.

Trade, particularly with the Baltic, expanded in the early 18th century leading to a population

growth in the town from 7,000 in the 1670s to 15 -18,000 a century later.

Hull’s commerce was originally confined to the old harbour (around the mouth of the River

Hull extending to North Bridge). It was a

natural harbour with cargoes landed

and loaded on the wharves on the west

side of the river. At the time it was

unique as it had no legal Quay and

therefore it was difficult for the custom

officers to assess duty to be paid,

Page 13: Hull Development Framework

leading to a loss of revenue for the government. For this reason and the increase in trade,

fuelled by the Industrial Revolution in West Yorkshire, Hull’s first dock, Queen’s Dock was

opened to relieve congestion in the old harbour (see above). Construction began in 1775 and

was completed in 1778 and at the time was the largest dock in England. As part of its

development the town walls to the north were demolished and much needed land released for

development. New wide roads and elegant middle class terraces followed quickly, the

remains of which form the Georgian New Town Conservation Area today. Two other docks,

the present Humber Dock and Princes Dock, were opened in 1809 and 1820 respectively.

Due largely to the confined nature of Hull prior to 1800, little

development from this time exists today. A noteworthy exception is

Charterhouse, a former monastery and almshouse whose origins date

back to the 14th century (right) and Sutton-on-Hull, a former agricultural

village in East Hull which was incorporated into the city in 1929.

19th and Early 20th Centuries (1800 – 1919) Hull benefited from the industrial growth of its hinterland from the late 18th century. It was not

just a port for the towns of the industrial revolution, it became a part of the revolution itself.

Some of the town’s leading merchants, such as the Blaydes, had diversified into industry. The

Blaydes family had gone into ship building (their claim to fame being that their shipyard built

the ‘Bounty’). The 19th century saw the establishment of industries based on processing raw

materials imported through the port, such as corn

milling, seed crushing and paint manufacturing

(left). The early century also saw a growth of

engineering in Hull, as ships became steam-

driven and then iron-hulled and the flourishing

flour and oil-seed crushing mills required more

sophisticated machinery.

The late 18th century saw the rise of the whaling trade in Hull, one of its main entrepreneurs

being Samuel Standidge, who sent three whalers to Greenland in 1768. By 1800, 40% of the

country’s whalers sailed from the town, the really prosperous period being 1815 to 1825 when

2,000 men were employed in the trade. The whaling trade brought increased prosperity to the

town until it began to decline through over-fishing in the mid 19th century. During the good

year of 1820, 50 vessels sailed from Hull to go whale hunting, but by 1832 this number had

declined to just 28.

By then, the fishing industry itself was beginning to take off. In the 1840s, the ‘silver pits’ – a

very fish-rich part of the North Sea (only 50 miles from Hull), led to fishermen from Devon and

Kent migrating to the Humber, at first seasonally and then permanently. The number of

Page 14: Hull Development Framework

‘smacks’ fishing from Hull rose from 29 in 1845 to 270 in 1863. Those employed as fishermen

rose from 4 in 1841 to 313 in 1861, 924 in 1871 and 1, 578 in 1881, with the corresponding

rise in the population of Hull from 32,958 in 1831 to 277,991 in 1911. The introduction in the

late 19th century of new fishing methods – the ‘trawl’ and of steam powered trawlers, meant

that Hull fisherman fished as far a field as Iceland and the White Sea and led to the dramatic

increase in employees in the fishing industry.

Trade and industry were further boosted by the arrival of the rail link with Leeds in 1840.

Other railways followed, including the Hull and Barnsley Railway and associated dock which

were opened in 1885 to break the perceived local

monopoly of the North Eastern Railway.

With the opening of the railways in Hull, five more docks

were constructed during the later 19th century and two

followed in the 20th century. The Town Docks system was

extended in 1846 when the Railway Dock (right) was

opened and its use was dominated by the Wilson Line,

Hull’s biggest steamship company. Victoria Dock followed

in 1850 and was the first to be built on the east side of the

River Hull, principally for the importing of timber from the Baltic. The Albert Dock, parallel to

the Humber was opened in 1869 and became the home of the North Sea fishing fleet. In 1883

St. Andrews Dock met the demands of the town’s expanding fishing industry. Further east

along the Humber Alexandra Dock opened in 1885 and further east still King George Dock

was opened in 1914.

Hull’s earliest industrial

development took place

along the east bank of the

River Hull (Drypool village –

in an area that still contains

a number of historic mills

and warehouses). New

docks were built, to the west

of the old town to

accommodate the growing

fishing industry and to the

east for the timber trade.

The processing and

manufacturing industries were concentrated northwards alongside the River Hull (left). Near

the docks and industrial areas vast numbers of working class houses were built, first

westwards to the south of Anlaby Road and to the north west between Beverley Road and the

river and then to the east along Holderness and Hedon Roads. Many families in these areas

Page 15: Hull Development Framework

lived in short courts running at right angles to the main street (containing typically 6 to 10

dwellings) ending with a wall dividing them from the corresponding court running from the

adjoining street. This cul-de-sac terraced housing was distinctive to Hull and examples still

exist, particularly off Hawthorn Avenue, Newland Avenue and Holderness Road.

The industrial revolution brought with it pollution, poverty and poor living conditions, which in

turn led to ill health. During the Victorian period a number of national and local housing policy

reforms sought to address concerns over living conditions and health, leading to significant

but gradual improvement. The main national policy reforms are as follows:-

• 1842 Chadwicks report on the ‘Sanitary Conditions of the Labouring Population’

• 1844 First report published by the Royal Commission on the Health of Towns

• 1848 ‘First Public Health Act’ – covered sewage, drainage and housing.

• 1868 ‘Sanitary Act’ – required local authorities to improve housing standards

• 1875 ‘Artisans and Labourers Dwellings Improvement Act (Cross’ Act) – gave local

authorities powers to compulsory purchase dwellings unfit for habitation and build

new properties for letting (in practice in Hull little was achieved in this era due to the

compensations needing to be paid, the cost of construction and the high rents

needed to meet these costs)

• 1890 ‘Houses of the Working Classes Act’ – delegated more health-related powers

to local authorities, increased their duties to report unfit housing and further

empowered them to build council housing using money collected from rates.

Despite the above housing/health acts municipal housing in Hull was very limited before the

First World War, although some were constructed through philanthropic societies. In 1862 the

‘Society for Improving the Condition of the Labouring Classes’, erected a tenement block

called the ‘Model Dwellings’ (now owned by the Sutton Housing Trust) on the corner of

Midland and St. Luke’s Streets (Thornton area). In 1889-90 the Hull Artisans and Labourers

Dwellings Co. Ltd built 53 houses in the area now know as Gordon Avenue in the New Bridge

Road area.

In Hull in the 19th century middle class

housing was limited. The town’s

wealthiest merchants had relocated to

the villages west of Hull, whilst the rest

built imposing terraces along Anlaby

Road, Spring Bank and Beverley Road

in the 1840’s and 1850’s. In 1860

Pearson Park was opened, Hull’s first

example of an extensive, publicly

Page 16: Hull Development Framework

accessible recreation space, followed in the 1870’s by the Avenues (above) with tall Victorian

terraced houses along tree-lined boulevards. Other notable examples of this later Victorian

housing, which still exist today, include Boulevard and Coltman Street.

In the late 19th century Hull’s main shopping area gradually moved westwards from its original

site around Market Place in the Old Town. It gradually gravitated towards Paragon Station

after it opened in 1848, although the commercial centre (the banks, insurance companies,

merchants’ and solicitors’ offices) remained on Lowgate and Silver Street. A new city centre

was formed around 1900 with the creation of Queen Victoria Square and the laying out of

King Edward Street, Jameson Street and Alfred Gelder Street.

Hull was granted city status in 1897 and the civic pride that went with it is demonstrated in the

grandeur of its Edwardian public buildings, such as the Guildhall (completed in 1916)

designed by the architect Sir Edwin Cooper and the City Hall (opened in1909) designed by

Joseph H Hirst, the first city architect.

Hull was at its most prosperous in the

years before the First World War and an

Edwardian spirit of improvement went with

this prosperity. On Cottingham Road, to

the north, a teacher training college (now

part of the University of Hull campus) was

constructed in 1910. To the east, Sir

James Reckitt bought 130 acres of land for

his employees and created Hull’s ‘Garden

Village’ designed by local architects Runton and Barry (opened in 1908) which embodied the

attributes of space, architecture and nature associated with the garden city movement (left).

Inter War Years (1919 – 1945) The sense of civic pride and drive for improvement appears to have continued through the

inter-war period, principally around the expanding city centre. Ferens Art Gallery was opened

in 1927, work began on the development of Ferensway in 1931 and the creation of Queen’s

Gardens in 1930. By the 20th century Queen’s Dock (which had been in use for over 150

years) was becoming redundant, more docks had opened in the city and deep sea fishing had

moved to these newer docks, and in 1930 it finally closed.

It was then purchased by the Hull Corporation for

£100,000 and over the next four years it was filled in and

landscaped to become a Pleasure Garden (now Queen’s

Gardens). 1927 also saw the start of construction of

University College Hull, then an external college of the

University of London (later to become the University of

Hull). It opened a year later with 14 departments in pure sciences and the arts and 39

Page 17: Hull Development Framework

students. The college at that time consisted of one building, the Venn Building (named after

the mathematician John Venn, who was born in Hull) on Cottingham Road (above left). The

college gained its Royal Charter in 1954 which empowered it to award its own degrees,

making it the third university in Yorkshire and the 14th in England.

The 1920’s and 1930’s saw industrial decline, exacerbated by over-production in the fishing

industry, however this period saw many improvements in housing. The landmark ‘Addison

Housing and Town Planning Act’ of 1919 followed on from Lloyd George’s famous speech in

1918 promising “to make Britain a fit country for heroes to live in”. This act brought radical

changes across the country, including Hull. For the first time, legislation forced local

authorities to build new houses in working class areas and all towns and cities with

populations over 20,000 had to prepare

development schemes. Central

government gave financial help for this

between 1919 to 1923. Local authorities

were required to do surveys of their areas

to find out what the housing problems

were (right) and the municipal housing

created had to be let at a low rent so

poorer families could afford them. This resulted in the construction of 518 local authority

homes in Hull, with the main sites being Gipsyville, Preston Road and Greenwood Avenue

estates. In the private sector there was extensive ribbon housing development along the main

arterial roads, particularly to the west of the city.

The ‘Chamberlain Housing Act’ of 1923 sought to encourage private housing development

through the use of subsides, this led to the construction of 2,667 private homes (which

continued until the early 1930’s) also known as ‘subsidy’ housing. The main areas being

Chanterlands/Bricknell Avenue, Calvert Lane and Belgrave Road in west Hull and James

Reckitt Avenue/Gillshill Road and Southcoates Lane in the east. In response to concerns that

the 1923 housing act was not benefiting the majority of the population, the ‘Wheatley Housing

Act’ (1924) put the focus back on providing homes for the working classes. ‘Subsidy’ housing

was unaffordable for most low paid working families. The ‘Greenwood Housing Act’ (1930)

introduced a five year programme for slum

clearance and forced local authorities to provide

housing for those who had lost their homes through

clearance schemes (left). Slums had developed in

British cities for economic reasons and Hull was no

exception. Working class families traditionally lived

in the city centre and close to their places of work.

A 1925 medical report on Hull stated that 2,578

houses were needed to re - house persons living in unhealthy areas. The report also

Page 18: Hull Development Framework

mentioned “much overcrowding” in the “narrow courts” with demolition as the only solution.

Under these two acts 4,000 new homes were built in the city. In total there were 34 demolition

orders between April 1931 and September 1938 involving 10,578 people, 2,790 houses and

numerous businesses.

During this period the Garden City Movement was particularly influential in offering a vision for

improved housing conditions. It promoted good quality housing in a heavily landscaped

setting, complemented by community facilities. In Hull this is probably best realised by the

aptly named ‘Garden Village’ which was started in 1907 but had another phase of

construction from 1923. Another example is ‘Broadway’, also in east Hull which was built by

British Oil and Cake Mills Ltd for its employees. The public sector adopted the space

standards of the Garden City Movement as well but owing to public funding constraints,

estates lacked the variety, architectural detailing and maintenance regimes that enhanced

private sector garden cities.

Approximately 10, 000 council houses were developed in west Hull during the inter-war period

following the slum clearances. These developments tended to follow the arterial roads and

included purpose-built centres and public open space. As a result of this expansion, by 1939

12% of housing stock in the city was council owned.

During the Second World War Hull’s port and industrial facilities, coupled with its proximity to

mainland Europe, saw it devastated by bombing raids. Much of

the city centre was completely destroyed. The city was the most

severely bombed British city or town apart from London, with 92%

of houses being damaged or destroyed (left). Of a population of

approximately 320,000 at the beginning of the war, approximately

192,000 were made homeless as a result of bomb damage. The

worst of the bombing occurred during March and May 1941. Little

was known about the extent of this destruction by the rest of the

country at the time since most of the radio and newspaper reports did not reveal Hull by name

but referred to it as a “North- East” town.

Post War Years (1945 – 1980) Following the widespread destruction in Hull in the Second World War, the services of two

great town planners, Sir Edwin Lutyens and Sir Patrick Abercrombie were secured to draw up

a reconstruction plan for the city – ‘A Plan for the City and County

of Kingston upon Hull – 1945’ (right) which also involved the

wholesale re-planning of the city centre. Among the more radical

ideas suggested in the plan included proposals to build a satellite

Page 19: Hull Development Framework

town for 60,000 people at Burton Constable and an inner ring road to run along a widened

High Street. Most of the proposals where not implemented, although some, including the

inner ring road, were incorporated in the City Council’s own Development Plan (1954), to the

detriment of the Old Town.

Housing clearance accelerated after the war, with council housing forming most of the

replacement development. Between 1945 and

1989 the number of council homes rose from

10,000 to over 50,000 accounting for almost

fifty per cent of the city’s housing stock. In

east Hull this development took place around

Bilton Grange, Greatfield (right) and Longhill

and in west Hull at Boothferry Estate and

Priory Road/Bricknell Avenue. These early

estates mainly followed the inter war patterns

of development.

Some inner city redevelopment (1960 - 80) took place, principally between Anlaby Road and

Hessle Road, south of Spring Bank and east of Beverley Road, but most building happened

on the peripheral edges of the built up area, Ings and Bransholme (east Hull) and Orchard

Park (west Hull) are foremost examples. Bransholme was built as a largely self-sufficient

residential community incorporating a number of schools,

churches, community facilities and retail areas. It had

come into being following the war when it became

necessary (largely due to the devastation caused during

the war) to re-house on a massive scale. The City Council

already owned a lot of undeveloped land on the northern

margin of the city and acquired more by 1948. The

intention of the council at the time was to provide a new

town rather than a large estate but government approval

was not forthcoming. The ‘Bransholme Estate’ (left) was

originally planned to house a population of 26,000 and this

figure grew to over 30,000 at its height. It was built in the

late 1960’s and early 70’s with the first homes officially opened on 1st May 1967.

This later council building (1960 – 80) was influenced by the 1961 report on housing space

standards in public housing entitled ‘Homes for Today and Tomorrow’ published by the Parker

Morris Housing Committee. The report concluded that the quality of social housing needed to

be improved to match the rise in living standards and made a number of recommendations,

resulting in the ‘Parker Morris Standards’. In 1967 these space standards became mandatory

Page 20: Hull Development Framework

of all housing built in new towns and was extended to all new council housing in 1969. In Hull

in this period new types of development were tried including (i) non-traditional pre-fabricated

building techniques, (ii) inward looking estates designed according to ‘Radburn principles’

with roads and parking at the edges of pedestrian housing areas, and (iii) high-rise

development. The ‘Ings Caspons’ estate is an example where all three ‘advances’ were tried

(probably unsuccessfully in hindsight).

The profile of trade and industry

changed in Hull after the war

which had a dramatic effect on

the city as a whole during this

period. By the 1950’s

trawlermen had made Hull a

wealthy city, at its peak almost

8,000 trawlermen worked out of

its docks (left). But in the later

part of the second half of the

century the industry was

plagued by over-fishing and

foreign competition. Trawlers had become bigger and more efficient and took more fish.

Relations with Iceland, where fishing was central to the national economy, deteriorated in the

1960’s leading to the ‘cod wars’ when British naval ships had to protect Hull’s trawler fleet.

The trawler industry was greatly damaged by the last of these ‘Cod Wars’ in the 70’s but

managed to survive by investing in new port facilities and building food-processing plants,

until 1980 when the whole Hull trawler fleet went bankrupt.

Post 1980’s From the 1980’s in terms of housing, the emphasis moved away from clearance to one of

recovery and refurbishment. Urban regeneration became the key concern for Hull. It

describes a wide range of activities designed to bring a new vitality and viability to previously

run down areas of the city. Regeneration involved refurbishing buildings, renewing

infrastructure and the built environment and redeveloping buildings that have reached the end

of their useful life. This gradual renewal and regeneration was generally considered to be less

socially and economically disruptive than the clearances of earlier in the century.

Successful examples of these regeneration schemes (in chronological order) include,

Coltman Street Housing Action Area, North Hull Housing Action Trust and The Garths and

Gipsyville Regeneration Priority Areas.

The first of these examples, Coltman Street, became a Housing Action Area (HAA) in 1983. It

gave the Council powers to make private landlords provide adequate accommodation and

improve the physical look of their properties. Private developers were also encouraged to

Page 21: Hull Development Framework

come into the area to build new houses and convert

and refurbish some of the historic older properties. In

the last two years of the HAA the Council also

undertook environmental works, such as repaving,

renewing railings and walls and creating roadside

islands to delineate car parking bays. Overall, the HAA

was considered a success and succeeded in saving

the historic character of Coltman Street (left).

Housing Action Trusts (HAT) were set up by the

government to redevelop some of the poorest council

housing estates in Britain, six Housing Action Trusts

were established under the ‘Housing Act of 1988’,

including North Hull Housing Action Trust. North Hull became the first HAT to begin after the

1988 act which allowed HATs to take over the running of local authority estates. The main

aim of the North Hull HAT was to achieve long lasting improvements in the living conditions of

residents by repairing and improving properties, managing the housing stock more effectively,

encouraging diversity of tenure and generally improving the overall social, environmental and

physical conditions of the estate. Work started in April 1991 on the £50 million five year

improvement scheme and by the end of the programme (in 1999, Hull was the first of the

original six areas to complete their schedule of works) the Trust had carried out renovation

work on 2,332 properties and a further 335 new properties had been built.

In east Hull, The Garths Geographical Priority Area (GPA) is another example of a major

housing modernisation and improvement programme in an existing local authority council

estate. GPAs took a more holistic approach to urban renewal, they moved the emphasis away

from only tackling physical problems to incorporate wider social issues, such as education,

health, social inclusion and sustainable development. In The Garths, these measures

included improving greenspace, creating jobs and new businesses, reinforcing lifelong

learning, providing leisure and cultural facilities and community support. The programme was

formally approved in December 1994, with funding secured under the Single Regeneration

Budget (SRB) Phase One and delivered by the City Council through City Vision Ltd. (its

regeneration delivery partner), a company based upon a partnership of organisations drawn

from across the public, private, community and voluntary sectors.

Through the Single Regeneration

Budget Phase Two, the Council and

City Vision were again successful in

obtaining £11.7 million (the final overall

value of this regeneration scheme was

£71 million when finished) for the

Page 22: Hull Development Framework

improvement of the Gipsyville council estate. This programme involved major redevelopment

of the estate including some demolition of the original properties and replacement by private

housing (see above).

In terms of private housing, the major developments have happened on reclaimed docklands

(in east and west Hull) and at Kingswood on the northern margin of the city. The profile of

trade in Hull had changed after the war and this continued into the 1980’s. Following the

closure of the smaller, older docks and the increase in container and passenger ferry traffic at

Queen Elizabeth and King George Docks, Associated British Ports decided to sell their

redundant sites at Victoria Dock and Priory Sidings (Summergroves). These were

redeveloped by private developers (from the late1980’s and completed by 2003) and have

evolved into successful communities. Kingswood was created within the last ten years on the

north edge of the city. The housing estate continues to spread northwards as construction is

completed (although completions have slowed in recent months due to the economic

recession) and the homes are considered ‘aspirational’ by much of Hull’s population.

In more recent times, the urban renaissance agenda, backed by government intervention,

aims to bring about more sustainable forms of development. In Hull, the Council has been

actively developing this agenda, by attempting to tackle the problem of urban drift, high levels

of vacancies in both public and private sector housing and surplus school places. Wards

within the city which display the highest levels of vacancies, market fragility and lack of

investment by owners have been prioritised for action. This action is being delivered by the

‘Gateway Hull and East Riding of Yorkshire Pathfinder Housing Market Renewal’ (usually

referred to as ‘Hull Gateway’) programme, it submitted its prospectus in 2004 and is

responsible for bidding for funding from the government’s housing renewal fund and attracting

additional public/private sector investment. To date Hull Gateway has secured over £150

million of government funding.

Gateway’s strategic regeneration area in east Hull is the Holderness Road Corridor (HRC).

Action is happening first in Ings and on Preston Road where a new generation of energy-

efficient homes are being built. At Ings, Gateway is demolishing 260 ‘Caspon’ houses and is

replacing them with new, energy-efficient

homes for rent, sale and shared ownership to

the east of Mitcham Road and Camberwell Way

(left).

On Preston Road, the first phase of house

building has been completed with the

construction of 107 homes at Ellerby Grove. A

scheme to demolish the sub-standard ‘Wild’ houses to the east of Holderness Drain is also

underway on Preston Road.

Page 23: Hull Development Framework

In west Hull the strategic regeneration programme is

underway in Newington and St. Andrews wards

(NaSA). The schemes include: a £12 million

development of over 100 eco-friendly homes at

Woodcock Street (right), a refurbishment of more

than 400 homes at Melrose Street, Plane Street,

Sandringham Street and St. Georges Road and the

acquisition of homes and commercial properties west of Hawthorn Avenue which will become

part of the redevelopment of the former Amy Johnson School site.

In terms of industry and trade for Hull in the post 80’s, many of the old industries which

originally developed in the city to process imported raw materials are still here, including

pharmaceutical firms Reckitt Benckiser and Smith and Nephew and the millers Maizecor. The

port is still, after over 700 years, a major importer of timber from northern Europe and a chief

passenger ferry terminal to the continent. There is also a larger awareness of the potential of

tourism as a generator of prosperity. Tourism is growing rapidly in the city and is recognised

as one of the most important industries by the Council: it relates closely to one of the

authority’s key priorities by providing a wider range of jobs. Like most other cities of its size,

there is a strategy in place for developing Hull as a

tourist destination. The city boasts a wealth of maritime

heritage and a range of museums and galleries. Its key

strengths include: ‘The Deep’, the Humber waterfront

and the Marina, the ‘Heritage Quarter’ – which includes

Wilberforce House, the Streetlife Museum, the ‘Fish

Trail’ (left) and the ‘Old Town’, shopping and numerous

interesting pubs and bars. Physical improvements have been incorporated by this promotion

of tourism, such as the pedestrianisation of the city centre and the construction of modern

shopping centres (Princes Quay and St. Stephens) and the travel interchange, which have

improved the overall appearance of the city in the past 30 years.

Page 24: Hull Development Framework

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!!!

!

!

!

!

! ! !

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Map 1Historic Growth Map of Hull

Legend

Medieval Core and Sutton and Marfleet Villages

Georgian New Town Expansion

1870 to 1911

1912 to 1945

1946 to present

City Boundary

1800 to 1869

!

! !

!

!

Page 25: Hull Development Framework

4. Overall Character of Hull It is generally agreed that the city of Hull has a distinct character, identity and sense of place,

however it is more difficult to pinpoint exactly what it is that makes the city distinctive. To help

in this task, the City Council and the Architecture Centre for Hull and the Humber Region

(Arc) organised various events during summer 2009 to explore the concept of ‘Hullness’.

Perhaps not surprisingly, no definitive view was reached and the debate continues. However,

the responses to the events have highlighted some recurring themes and factors that

contribute to the distinct character of the city. These are set out below. ‘Hullness’ has been

concerned with ‘character’ in all its senses, including cultural, social, economic, environmental

and physical aspects. However, for the purposes of this study, ‘character’ is concerned with

the impact of the above elements on the built form of the city.

• The physical setting of Hull in a flat landscape where the River Hull joins the Humber

Estuary means that expanses of water and sky are characteristic features of the city.

Hull is an industrial port city located some distance away from other large towns and

set in the rural East Riding of Yorkshire. Traditionally it has looked to the sea and

continental Europe rather than the rest of England. Unlike most other northern and

midland cities, it is not part of a conurbation. This relative isolation has given it an

independent and distinctive character.

• Trade with Baltic, Dutch and French ports over the centuries has influenced the built

form, architecture, economy and culture of the city. 17th century prints show Hull to

resemble a Dutch town, walled and almost surrounded by water, with buildings of

Dutch-style bricks, gables and pantiled roofs. Construction of the Town Docks In the

late 18th century brought water inland to what would become the city centre and

development of the Georgian New Town began. The Old Town became, in effect, an

island and today it still retains a defined identity and medieval street pattern.

• The 19th century brought expansion of the docks and development of associated

industries. Distinctive communities developed linked to these industries: fishing in

west Hull, with migrants from other coastal areas of the UK; cargo handling in east

Hull; and oilseed processing to the north on both banks of the River Hull. The

industrial area along the River Hull retains its historic character in the Wincolmlee

area. The physical barrier of the River Hull and the limited number of bridge crossings

has meant that the west and east sides of the city have developed with differing

characters and identities, most notably manifested by the city producing two rival

rugby teams. Physical expansion of the city resulted in a series of long, straight radial

roads, with the streets between them packed with very high density housing of a type

that is unique to Hull – ‘courts’ of short terraces at right angles to the street with

Page 26: Hull Development Framework

pedestrian-only access. Although now far fewer in number, areas of these terraces

still exist in the inner area today. At the same time, early planned developments of

good quality houses began, such as the Avenues in west Hull and Garden Village in

east Hull. Improvements to the city centre in the late Victorian period brought

distinctively designed public buildings such as the Guildhall and City Hall, and wide

new streets of commercial buildings, e.g. Jameson Street and King Edward Street.

• In the 20th century, particularly following the two world wars, social factors came to

the fore with programmes of housing improvement through slum clearance and the

evolution of town planning. The radial roads were extended into tree-lined dual

carriageways and a ring of public housing estates were developed around the city.

This type of development is found in most large towns and cities, and it reflects the

styles of the time, e.g. garden city style estates in the interwar period and non-

traditional layouts in the 1960s. These estates are a significant feature of the city, not

least because of the extensive areas of land they occupy. During the post WW2

period the out-migration of more affluent people to East Riding settlements just

beyond the city boundary, such as Cottingham and Willerby, has continued and

accelerated. This process began in the 19th century with the arrival of the railway,

while in the 20th century it has been largely enabled by the growth in incomes and car

ownership. This has meant that the city has continued to be dominated by terraced

housing for the less affluent, although this is being addressed with the development

of new ‘aspirational’ housing in areas such as Victoria Dock and Kingswood.

Economically, the period since the 1970s has seen a significant decline in Hull’s

traditional industries, with resulting dereliction, although the port continues to thrive

but with far fewer employees.

• Despite extensive war-time bombing and post-war redevelopment, the city centre

remains spacious and this is enhanced by extensive pedestrianisation and the

absence of through traffic. Neglect of the Old Town following WW2 inadvertently

helped to preserve it. Regeneration of the area since the 1980s has capitalised on an

asset that many visitors do not expect to find in Hull. A marked contrast is evident

between the narrow streets and confined buildings of the Old Town and the wide

streets and openness of the New Town, where much of the post-war commercial

development has taken place. Following a period of post-war reconstruction with plain

buildings of indifferent design, some distinctive buildings have been constructed in

recent years that reflect Hull’s maritime character, in particular the Princes Quay

shopping centre over the former Princes Dock and The Deep, a millennium visitor

attraction located where the River Humber joins the Humber Estuary. Similarly,

residential development on the former Victoria Dock has drawn inspiration from Hull’s

maritime past, though many other developments consist of standard volume house-

Page 27: Hull Development Framework

builder designs. Most recently the St Stephens shopping development adjacent to the

rail and bus station has brought a bespoke design to a prominent location. Even with

these developments, the city remains predominantly low-rise in character.

• The interaction of Hull’s physical setting with its economic and social development

over time, and the resulting built form, has created the character of the present-day

city. This character can be summarised, in simple terms, as an industrial port city set

on an estuary some distance from other towns and cities, where the flatness of the

land and expanses of sky and water are constantly evident. Particular features of Hull

include: the city centre where the narrow streets of the Old Town contrast with the

spaciousness of the New Town; radial roads lined by small shops giving way to tree-

lined dual carriageways; inner city areas where late Victorian/Edwardian terraces

stand alongside post-war redevelopment; extensive outer estates of public housing

that are known largely only to the people who live in them; and post-1980s

regeneration with distinctive new buildings in the city centre and waterfront area.

Page 28: Hull Development Framework

5. Townscape Types and Character Areas in Hull The second stage of the study has involved applying the landscape setting and historic

evolution sections of the first stage to a map base. 22 types of townscape were identified,

based on the type of land use and the age of development. These were then mapped across

the city to identify local character areas. For example, the ‘interwar council estates’

townscape type can be found in the Gipsyville, Derringham Bank, North Hull, Preston Road

and Old Bilton Grange areas of the city. However, this produced a very complex map of some

120 different local character areas. At first sight Hull is comprised of broad bands of different

ages of development (e.g. 19th century inner city, postwar peripheral estates) and broad areas

of different types of land use (e.g. housing, industry). But in fact there is often considerable

variety within areas characterised by these broad ages and types of development. For

example, Gipsyville is a relatively clearly defined local area characterised by an interwar

council estate; however, the area also comprises a radial road retail centre, pre First World

War terraced housing, 1990s housing redevelopment and an industrial area. Each of these

represents a different townscape type and therefore each would be a separate character

area. Similar mixes of uses/ ages are found in many other areas of the city, particularly where

there has been infill development or redevelopment. Many character areas would therefore be

very small in size, and it would be unrealistic in terms of resources to attempt to survey and

analyse them all in any detail.

As a consequence of this it was decided to simplify the process by identifying character areas

in terms of their predominant townscape type. This has reduced the total number by around

half to 58. They are identified by physical boundaries, such as main roads, railways, drains

and open spaces, which often define community boundaries, and the predominant age and

type of development. For example, the Gipsyville area described above is identified as a

single character area. The boundaries of some areas are more easily determined than others

– it is hoped that consultation will give some feedback on where boundaries should be

located. Within these larger areas, sub-areas can often be identified, representing the more

complex pattern of uses/ ages referred to above. These will be taken into account, and if

considered desirable can be explored in more detail, in the character area assessments. The

number of townscape types was reduced slightly to 19.

The proposed townscape types and character areas are set out in the following table and

identified on the map.

Page 29: Hull Development Framework

Table 1: Townscape Types and Character Areas in Hull

Townscape Type Townscape Character Areas

1. Medieval Core A. Old Town

2. 18th Century Expansion A. New Town

3. 19th, 20th and 21st Century City Centre Development – mixed uses but predominantly commercial

A. Jameson Street/King Edward Street/Freetown Way/Ferensway/Prospect Centre/Princes Quay/St Stephens/Hull College/Marina

4. Historic Village Core A. Sutton

5. Pre World War 1 Terraces (1800-1919)

A. St. Andrews B. Newington C. Albert Avenue D. Botanic E. Dukeries/Sunnybank/Chanterlands Avenue F. Newland Avenue G. Sculcoates H. Mersey Street I. New Bridge Road

6. Pre World War 1 Suburbs (1800-1919) A. Avenues/Pearson Park B. Garden Village

7. Interwar Council Estates (1919-1945)

A. Gipsyville B. North Hull Estate C. Preston Road D. Old Bilton Grange

8. Interwar Private Suburbs (1919-1945)

A. Anlaby High Road B. Derringham/Willerby Road/Wold Road/Priory Road C. Bricknell Avenue/Fairfax Avenue D. Beverley High Road E. Chamberlain Road F. James Reckitt Avenue/Gillshill Road/Ings Road G. Holderness High Road/Broadway/Southcoates Lane

9. Post World War 2 Council Estates (traditional) (mainly 1945-1960)

A. Boothferry Estate B. Longhill C. New Bilton Grange D. Greatfield

10. Post World War 2 Council Estates (non-traditional) (mainly 1960-1980)

A. Orchard Park B. North Bransholme C. Bransholme D. Ings Estate

11. Interwar & Post World War 2 Council Inner City Redevelopment (1930-39 & 1955-90)

A. Porter Street/Thornton Estate B. Londesborogh Street C. Bridlington Avenue

12 Post World War 2 Private Suburbs (1945-1980)

A. Downfield Avenue/Compass Road/Stanbury Road B. Sutton Park C. Fleet Estate

Page 30: Hull Development Framework

13. Post 1980 Private Estates

A. Summergroves B. Kingswood C. Howdale Road/Salthouse Road D. Victoria Dock

14. Pre World War 1 Industrial (1800-1919)

A. Wincolmlee B. DrypoolWilmington/Stoneferry

15. Interwar Industrial (1919-1945) A. National Avenue B. Clough Road

16. Post World War 2 Industrial A. Hessle Road B. Sutton Fields C. Hedon Road

17. Docks A. Albert/William Wright Docks B. Alexandra Dock C. Queen Elizabeth/King George Docks

18. Post 1980 Business and Retail Parks A. St Andrew’s Quay B. Priory Park C. Kingswood

19. Agricultural Land A. North of Kingswood B. East of Bransholme C. East of Greatfield

Page 31: Hull Development Framework

19

8. B

10. C

8. C

8. D

19

7. B

8. F

17. C

14. B

8. A

16. C

7. A

9. C

9. A

7. C

8. G

9. D

12. B

5. A

8. E

5. C3. A

16. B

13. C

10. D

16. A

6. A

13. B

9. B

5. E

10. A

4. A

10. B

5. F

5. B

7. D

19

12. A

17. B

15. B

14. A

5. G

5. D 5. I

11. A

18. B

13. D1. A

6. B

5. H

2. A

18. C

15. A

12. C

11. B

11. C

13. A18. A

17. A

Map 2Location of Townscape Types in Hull

KeyMedieval Core1

18th Century Expansion2

19th/20th/21st Century City Centre Development3

Historic Village Core4

Pre World War One Terraces (1800 - 1919)5

Pre World War One Suburbs (1800 - 1919)6

Interwar Council Estates (1919 - 1945)7

8 Interwar Private Suburbs (1919 - 1945)

9 Post World War Two Council Estates (1945 - 1960)

Post World War Two Council Estates (1960 - 1980)10

Interwar/Post World War Two Council InnerCity Redevelopment (1930 - 39 and 1955 - 90)11

13 Post 1980 Private Estates

Post World War Two Private Suburbs (1945 - 1980)12

14 Pre World War One Industrial (1800 - 1919)

15 Interwar Industrial (1919 - 1945)

17 Docks

16 Post World War Two Industrial

19 Agricultural Land

18 Post 1980 Business and Retail Parks

Page 32: Hull Development Framework

6. Townscape Types Assessment 1. Medieval Core Generic Description: Mixed use commercial, retail, leisure and residential area. Layout is

generally determined by historic street pattern with varying widths of street, dependant on

period of development and use at the time of development. The built form has buildings of a

variety of scales dependant on period of development and importance of the buildings. Older

buildings tend to be brick, later replaced with stone and more modern materials latterly.

Character Areas: Old Town* 2. 18th Century Expansion Generic Description: The first substantial development to occur outside Hull's Town Walls,

this area is characterised by the rectilinear street layout. The built form remaining from that

period consists primarily of brick terraces of houses (many with partial basements and use of

attics), along with public buildings and planned open space of Kingston Square.

Character Areas: New Town* 3. 19th, 20th and 21st Century City Centre Development Generic Description: (a) Late 19th century wide new streets developed with grander

commercial and public buildings, often stone or glazed, e.g. King Edward Street, Jameson

Street, Alfred Gelder Street. (b) Some continuation of this after WW1 e.g. Ferensway. (c) Post

World War 2 redevelopment following bombing e.g.Paragon Street, and purpose built covered

shopping centres e.g. Prospect Centre, Princes Quay and St Stephens. Mainly aimed at retail

and related uses with considerable provision for cars. Modern buildings with limited

architectural detailing and tend to be lower in height. Early postwar buildings often brick, more

recent are concrete, glass, steel.

Character Areas: City Centre

4. Historic Village Cores Generic Description: Rural village settlements incorporated into the city as it expanded.

These areas have retained their historic character, distinctly different from the surrounding

areas and subsequent developments.

Character Areas: Sutton*, Marfleet*

5. Pre World War I Terraces (1800 – 1919) Generic Description: Smaller, typically terraced houses built between 1800 and 1919. These

areas are characterised by high density, predominantly 2 storey brick terraced houses. The

layout is typically in the form of grid arranged streets, and (with the exception of The

Dukeries) small pedestrian ‘court’ housing at right angles to the houses fronting the street.

Communal back-alleys (‘tenfoots’) provide rear service access. Variations are subtle and

Page 33: Hull Development Framework

relate to whether properties have a front garden and/or bay window, the level of architectural

detailing, if they have a back yard or garden, and on the internal space standards.

Character Areas:, Hawthorn Avenue/St. Georges Road, Albert Avenue, Dukeries, Newland

Avenue, Sculcoates Lane, Abbey Street, Mersey Street/ Westcott Street, New Bridge Road.

6. Pre World War I Suburbs (1800 – 1919) Generic Description: Larger housing built between 1800 and 1919. These areas have larger

properties in more spacious plots with front and rear gardens. Streets tend to be tree-lined

and public open space within or in proximity to the development was also a feature. The

densities, layout and type of housing built vary considerably between the character areas.

The properties tend to have distinctive architectural styles and features. Internally, the

properties tend have generous space standards.

Character Areas: Boulevard*, Coltman Street*, Avenues*, Newland Park*, Garden Village*,

Anlaby Park*

7. Interwar Council Estates (1919 – 1945) Generic Description: These areas consist of predominantly two-storey semi-detached and

terraced housing with front and back gardens. The areas typically have good space

standards, both internally and externally, although minimal architectural detailing was

incorporated to the buildings. The areas were typically laid out on a pattern-adapted-grid

network of wide streets, and sometimes including small open spaces and grass verges. Some

elements of garden city principles were incorporated into the layouts. Character Areas: Gipsyville, Derringham Bank, North Hull, Preston Road, Old Bilton Grange

8. Interwar Private Suburbs (1919 – 1945) Generic Description: Predominantly detached and semi-detached medium density housing,

provided with front and back gardens (adopting some garden city principles), good space

standards internally and externally, with more architectural detailing than public housing from

the same era. Typically loosely laid out on a network of wide roads, including some cul-de-sac

and small greens. Parking tends to be on-plot.

Character Areas: Willerby Road, Chanterlands Avenue, Bricknell Avenue, Desmond Avenue/

Welwyn Park Avenue, James Reckitt Avenue/Gillshill Road, Southcoates Lane, Broadway

9. Post World War II Council Estates – traditional build (1945 – 1960) Generic Description: Predominantly brick semi-detached housing with blocks of terraced

housing. Housing is typically medium density, with front and back gardens (adopting some

garden city principles). Normally laid out on a network of wide streets, with some cul-de-sac

and small greens. There are good space standards internally and externally. The buildings

have minimal architectural detailing. Car parking is either on-plot, on-street or within small

parking courts.

Page 34: Hull Development Framework

Character Areas: Boothferry Estate, Priory Road, Grammar School Road, Spring Cottage,

Longhill, New Bilton Grange, Greatfield

10. Post World War II Council Estates – non - traditional build (1960 – 1980) Generic Description: Predominantly small blocks of terraced housing and low/medium/high-

rise apartment blocks of non-traditional materials and/ or construction. Housing is normally

provided at medium densities overall but with localised variations. Houses are typically

provided with small front and back gardens, while higher flat blocks tend to be set in open

space. Many of the areas use Radburn urban design principles (with roads and car parking at

the periphery of pedestrianised housing areas). Often these areas present a bleak

perspective with poor public realm.

Character Areas: Orchard Park, North Bransholme, Bransholme, Ings Estate

11. Interwar and Post World War II Council Inner Centre Redevelopment (1930-1939 & 1955-1990) Generic Description: Pre-war areas comprise relatively high density brick terraced houses

and small blocks of flats on early slum clearance sites. Post-war, these areas usually reflect

the era in which they were built following slum clearances. Most are 1960s/ 70s and typified

by a grid type layout of terraced houses with first floor bedsits above pedestrian

passageways. Houses tend to have front and back gardens, both with access to the street.

The front of the properties tends to face onto pedestrian areas with greenspaces, while

vehicular access and parking areas to the rear of properties. Pedestrian permeability tends to

have been reduced by closing of the walkways underneath bedsits which frequently are

vacant. Sometimes these areas present a bleak perspective with poor public realm.

Character Areas: Porter Street/Thornton, Redbourne Street/Constable Street, Selby Street/

Dairycoates/Newington Street, Walton Street, New George Street, Londesborough Street,

Grosvenor Street, Queens Road, Fountain Road/ Bridlington Avenue, Sculcoates Lane,

Barnsley Street, Victor Street

12. Post World War II Private Suburbs (1945 – 1980) Generic Description: This type of development is typically found on what were the outskirts

of the city to the north and the east. It consists of predominantly semi-detached housing and

detached housing. Some developments do contain elements of terraced housing and there is

a limited amount of low-rise flat development, typically above shops or commercial space.

The density of these developments is commonly low-medium. Houses are typically provided

with front and back gardens, good space standards externally, subtle architecture with limited

detailing and an emphasis on simplicity and function, normally laid out on a flowing network of

connected streets and cul-de-sac. Car parking for houses is normally provided on-plot either

on drives or in garages. Car parking for apartments is normally provided in communal

parking/garage courts.

Page 35: Hull Development Framework

Character Areas: Haworth Park, Sutton Park, Fleet Estate

13. Post 1980 Private Estates Generic Description: These areas typically consist of predominantly detached and semi-

detached housing set on winding and cul-de-sac roads and typically low density. The housing

is spatially economic both internally and externally in terms of the plots and also in terms of

public realm. Car parking tends to be on plot. The more recent developments in these areas

have begun to include medium-rise apartments and terraces. Densities appear to be

increasing, and greater pedestrian permeability is increasingly becoming an issue.

Character Areas: Summergroves, Kingswood, Howdale Road, Victoria Dock

14. Pre World War I Industrial (1800 – 1919) Generic Description: The built form of these areas is varied between original brick built

premises (which often display architectural character and detailing), and more modern frame-

built structures. The scale of premises is equally diverse, as is the range of employment and

business uses. The historic road layouts remain in place which can cause issues around

parking and servicing.

Character Areas: Wincolmlee, Drypool, Wilmington, Stoneferry,

15. Interwar Industrial (1919 – 1945) Generic Description: Original development consisted of large employment uses, in proximity

to housing to allow workers to access the site.

Character Areas: National Avenue, Clough Road 16. Post World War II Industrial Generic Description: Industrial development typically consists of metal-clad one-storey shed

developments of little architectural merit. Sizeable office areas include business parks with

large areas of surface parking.

Character Areas: Hessle Road, Argyle Street, Temple Street, Sutton Fields, Drypool, Hedon

Road

17. Docks Generic Description: Working docks remain within the city; used as commercial docks and

for passenger/ vehicle ferries. Mostly located in the east of the city. Working docks in the west

of the city tend to be underused at present.

Character Areas: Albert/William Wright Docks, Alexandra Dock, King George/Queen

Elizabeth Docks

Also worthy of note are the reused docks within the city: Queens Gardens is an in filled dock,

as is the Victoria Dock residential development. Princes Quay shopping centre and the

Page 36: Hull Development Framework

Marina are in the former Princes, Humber and Railway docks where water and dock features

remain apparent.

18. Post 1980 Business and Retail Parks Generic Description: Commercial areas, typically based around large expanses of surface

car parking. Built form tends to be large, clad buildings with some additions to add interest

and significant advertisements

Character Areas: St Andrew’s Quay, Priory Park, Kingswood

19. Agricultural land Generic Description: land used for crops or grazing

Character Areas: North of Kingswood, East of Bransholme, East of Greatfield

The following townscape types were identified on the first version of the map; however, they

contributed to its complexity and were therefore excluded from the second simplified map.

Estuary, River and Drain Banks Generic Description: Walkways alongside water corridors in the city. Includes: (a) the

Humber frontage, which where accessible tends to be hard landscaping; as is (b) the Hull

south of Stoneferry Bridge. North of this, the Hull has a green bank, much of which can be

walked along and forms an important natural break and green corridor in the city; and (c) the

drain banks, which are commonly grassed with undergrowth in places.

Character Areas: Humber Estuary, River Hull, Barmston Drain, Holderness Drain

Urban Greenspace Generic Description: Includes (a) formal parks, gardens, cemeteries and allotments; (b)

other greenspace such as playing fields, golf courses and informal open space; (c) natural

areas such as wood, meadow, heath and marsh; and (d) derelict land, which may be awaiting

redevelopment.

Character Areas: Pickering Park, West Park, Pearson Park, East Park; Western and General

Cemeteries, Northern Cemetery, Eastern Cemetery, Hedon Road Cemetery; Costello playing

fields, University sports ground, Oak Road playing fields, Bude Road/ Ennerdale playing

fields, Rockford Fields, Alderman Kneeshaw recreation ground, Greatfield playing fields,

Sutton Park golf course; derelict land at St. Andrews Dock and Kingswood.

Radial Roads including Retail Centres Generic Description: Main radial roads leading in to the city centre. Inner sections are

relatively wide and lined by late 19th/ early 20th century 3 storey brick terraces, often with

architectural detailing. Most were built as substantial houses for the well-off, but many are

now in use as small local shops or divided into low-rent flats. About 2 miles out the radial

Page 37: Hull Development Framework

roads become dual carriageways, typically developed in the interwar period, tree lined and

well landscaped. They are lined by large semi-detached and detached houses with large

gardens, with small groups of local shops at main road junctions.

Character Areas: Hessle Road*, Anlaby Road, Spring Bank, Princes Avenue*, Newland

Avenue, Chanterlands Avenue, Beverley Road*, Holderness Road* Estate Retail Centres/ Major Community Uses Generic Description: Local and district shopping centres in postwar residential areas,

usually developed on council housing estates and sometimes on private estates. They tend to

be away from main roads and are sometimes pedestrianised and inward-looking. They

typically have an adjoining car park and their architectural style is generally functional.

Major community uses include facilities such as the hospitals, universities and the prison. Character Areas: Bethune Avenue, Ellerburn Avenue, Grandale, North Point, Grampian

Way, Savoy Road, Shannon Road, Greenwich Avenue, Annandale Road shopping centres;

Hull Royal Infirmary, University of Hull, Hull Prison. * Conservation Area Character Appraisals exist for these areas (Old Town is divided into 3 separate areas; Holderness Road has 2)

Page 38: Hull Development Framework

Sources PPS1 Delivering Sustainable Development (ODPM, 2005)

PPS3 Housing (DCLG, 2006)

English Heritage website (www.english-heritage.org.uk)

Historic Environment – Local Management website (www.helm.org.uk)

A Character Assessment of Oxford in its Landscape Setting (Land Use Consultants for Oxford

City Council/ Countryside Agency, March 2002)

Plymouth Rapid Urban Character Study (Alan Baxter & Associates for English Heritage South

West Region, February 2005)

Brighton and Hove Urban Character Study (Brighton & Hove City Council, January 2009)

East Riding of Yorkshire Landscape Character Assessment (Carl Bro & Golder Associates for

East Riding of Yorkshire Council, November 2005)

Hull Extensive Heritage Appraisal (Taylor Young for Gateway Pathfinder Hull & East Riding of

Yorkshire, March 2006)

Neighbourhood Profiling work for Hull (DTZ Pieda for Gateway Pathfinder/ Hull City Council,

2005 – present)

Buildings of England: Yorkshire: York & the East Riding (N Pevsner & D Neave, 1995)

Historic maps of Hull

Aerial photographs of Hull

Page 39: Hull Development Framework

Appendix 1: Participation and Informal Consultation

Participation and informal consultation on the Hull Character Study included the following:

• CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment) workshop sessions

on 28th November 2008 and 2nd July 2009 where CABE gave advice on the built

environment, design and the character study;

• Hull Development Framework (HDF) Forum sessions on 11th December 2008 and

29th May 2009 where the ‘Hullness’ concept and proposed character areas were

discussed;

• ‘Hullness’ event at Arc (Architecture Centre for Hull and the Humber Region) on 24th

June 2009 where essayists presented their views on ‘Hullness’ and a panel debated

this before an invited audience; and

• the views of relevant organisations were sought during a 4 week period of informal

consultation between 4th November and 4th December 2009.

Page 40: Hull Development Framework

Appendix 2: Hull Character Study – Informal Consultation, November 2009 – Comments Received Consultee Document

reference Comment City Council Response

Arc General Comprehensive and interesting work. Particularly pleased that the ‘Hullness’ debates from last summer have helped inform the document.

Support welcomed.

Arc Stage 3 ‘Vistas’ is an important issue for consideration when looking in detail at specific character areas. Much damage can be done to townscape and roofscape views by developments that that do not consider the visual context in terms of long distance views. Highlighting key views and vistas in the next stage of the character study could help to address this.

The document contains a section on vistas in Chapter 2 Landscape Setting. Agree that this issue need to be examined in more detail in the next stage of the study. Reference to this can be made by adding the following to the 3rd bullet point under ‘Characterisation’ in Chapter 1: ‘and at a citywide level, the identification of key views’ ; and at the end of the last para under ‘Methodology’: ‘and citywide the identification of important views’

Arc Chapter 5 Agree with pragmatic approach of defining predominant character, but would emphasise the importance of unravelling this at the next more detailed stage of the assessment.

Support welcomed. The second para of Chapter 5 Townscape Types and Character Areas refers to the identification of sub-areas which can be examined in more detail.

Arc Chapter 6 The list of townscape types could be enhanced by the inclusion photographs to give the features a visual representation – this may be something for the next stage.

Agree – these will be added at the next stage.

Hull Civic Society

General In general an excellent document that brings together many of the tangible things which define and identify the city. An interesting and readable resume of the political and economic forces which have formed the city of today.

Support welcomed.

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 1, Characterisation

Welcome reference to improving the quality of life as a key aspect of the city’s character.

Support welcomed.

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 1, Characterisation

More could be made of reference to the importance of social and economic factors as drivers of the character and development of the city.

This can be reinforced by adding the following sentence before the last sentence in the 1st para under ‘Characterisation’: ‘Physical factors are explored in Chapter 2, and economic and social factors in Chapter 3. All are considered together in Chapter 4.’

Hull Civic Chapter 1, The document should make more reference to the concept Agree that this is relevant to the built form of Hull and

Page 41: Hull Development Framework

Society Methodology of the ‘City Region’ and so embrace the importance of the contiguous and surrounding villages which help to define Hull and its physical, social and economic characteristics. The more affluent suburbs are outside the city boundary and this detrimentally affects the socio-economic statistics of Hull.

reference to it is lacking in the document. Propose to add the following sentences before the last sentence in the 4th bullet point under Chapter 4 Overall Character: ‘During the post WW2 period the out-migration of more affluent people to East Riding settlements just beyond the city boundary, such as Cottingham and Willerby, has continued and accelerated. This process began in the 19th century with the arrival of the railway, while in the 20th century it has been largely enabled by the growth in incomes and car ownership. This has meant that the city has continued to be dominated by terraced housing for the less affluent, although this is being addressed with the development of new ‘aspirational’ housing in areas such as Victoria Dock and Kingswood.’

Hull Civic Society

Map 2 The townscape types should in some way reflect the west Hull villages functioning as part of the city.

The difficulty with this is that these areas are outside the city boundary and we are not in a position to undertake work on areas that we are not responsible for. This is a role of the ERYC. However, see above for reference to the significance of the west Hull villages.

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 2 Landscape Setting

Geology, last sentence: perhaps change ‘allows’ to ‘requires’ – this means that drains are needed.

Amend sentence to read: ‘which means that rainfall runs off the surface rather than infiltrates into the soil.’

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 2 Landscape Setting

Land use, first sentence: contest that Hull is ‘independent’ of the largely agricultural East Riding in view of the intimate socio-economic relationship between city and country.

As an industrial city, Hull has much less in common with the rural East Riding than market towns such as Beverley and Driffield. The main socio-economic relationship is with the Haltemprice area which contains commuter settlements rather than agricultural villages. Suggest amending sentence to read: ‘and largely independent from the agricultural East Riding.’

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 3 Historic Evolution

Medieval, 4th para: could make more of reference to the ‘largest Medieval brick structure’ in terms of exploiting the city’s heritage.

The character study is concerned with the process of historical evolution and how this has resulted in the city of today. Individual historic buildings, although important, are only part of the bigger picture and they are usually covered in detail elsewhere as Listed Buildings or within Conservation Areas.

Hull Civic Chapter 4 Overall More could be made of the ‘benign neglect’ of the Old Agree – after the 1st sentence of the 5th bullet point add the

Page 42: Hull Development Framework

Society Character Town between WW2 and the 1980s which resulted in it being preserved largely intact.

following sentences: ‘Neglect of the Old Town following WW2 inadvertently helped to preserve it. Regeneration of the area since the 1980s has capitalised on an asset that many visitors do not expect to find in Hull.’

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 4 Overall Character

More could be made of the extensive and historical radial road system which has enabled Hull to enjoy an efficient traffic flow with low levels of congestion.

The radial roads are already referred to 3 times in this section, in the 3rd, 4th and 6th bullet points.

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 4 Overall Character

Last 2 paras are a good overall summary that could be used as a preface to the document.

These paras may be used as a Preface in the final document.

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 6 Townscape Assessments

Types 9&10 (Post WW1&2 council estates): a general characteristic of these areas is the bleak perspective with poor public realm.

Agree, although traditional-build estates tend to have a better public realm. Chapter 6 Townscape Types Assessment, add final sentence to 10: ‘Often these areas present a bleak perspective with poor public realm.’; and 11: ‘Sometimes these areas present a bleak perspective with poor public realm.’

Hull Civic Society

Chapter 6 Townscape Assessments

More could be made of the Conservation Areas (although recognise that this might come in part 2 of the study).

Agree – Chapter 1 Introduction – Urban Characterisation, 1st para, add the following as a final sentence: ‘Characterisation therefore differs from conservation area appraisal, but is complementary to it.’