hull girder response - quasi-static analysis. basic relationships model the hull as a free-free box...

24
Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis

Upload: sophie-lane

Post on 17-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis

Page 2: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Basic Relationships

Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam. Beam on an elastic foundation

Must maintain overall Static Equilibrium. Force of Buoyancy = Weight of the Ship

LCB must be in line with the LCG

0 0

L Lg a x dx g m x dx

0 0

L Lg x a x dx g xm x dx

Page 3: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Basic Relationships

From Beam Theory – governing equation for bending moment:

Beam is experiencing bending due to the differences between the Weight and Buoyancy distributions

2

2

d mf x

dx Where f(x) is a distributed

vertical load.

( ) ( ) ( )f x b x w x

Buoyancyg a(x)

Net Load Weightg m(x)

Page 4: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Basic Relationships

buoyancy curve - b(x)

weight curve - w(x)

net load curve - f(x) = b(x) - w(x)

Sign Convention

PositiveUpwards+ f

Page 5: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Basic Relationships

The solution for M(x) requires two integrations:

The first integration yields the transverse shear force distribution, Q(x) Impose static equilibrium on a differential

element

QM

f

Q + dQ M + dM

dx

0Q f dx Q dQ dQ

fdx

0

xQ x f x dx C

But ships are “Free-Free” Beams - No shear at ends!Q(0) = 0 and Q(L) = 0, so C = 0

Page 6: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Finding Shear Distribution

Shear Force - Q

+ Q :PositiveClockwise

Sign Convention

PositiveUpwards+ f :

Net Load - f

+ Q

- Q

Page 7: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Basic Relationships

The second integration yields the longitudinal bending moment distribution, M(x): Sum of the moments about the right hand side

= 0

QM

f

Q + dQ M + dM

dx

02

dxM Qdx f dx M dM

0

dMQ

dx

0

xM x Q x dx D

Again, ships are “Free-Free” Beams - No moment at ends!M(0) = 0 and M(L) = 0, so D = 0

Page 8: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Finding Bending Moment Distribution

Shear Force - Q

Bending Moment - M

+ Q :PositiveClockwise

+ M : PositiveSagging

+ Q

- Q

- M

Sign Convention

Page 9: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Shear & Moment Curve Characteristics

Zero shear and bending moments at the ends.

Points of zero net load correspond to points of minimum or maximum shear.

Points of zero shear correspond to points of minimum or maximum bending moment.

Points of minimum or maximum shear correspond to inflection points on bending moment curve.

On ships, there is no shear or bending moments at the forward or aft ends.

Page 10: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Still Water Condition

Static Analysis - No Waves Present

Most Warships tend to Sag in this Condition

Putting Deck in Compression

Putting Bottom in Tension

Page 11: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Quasi-Static Analysis

Simplified way to treat dynamic effect of waves on hull girder bending

Attempts to choose two “worst case”conditions and analyze them. Hogging Wave Condition

» Wave with crest at bow, trough at midships, crest at stern.

Sagging Wave Condition» Wave with a trough at bow, crest at midships, trough at stern.

Wave height chosen to represent a “reasonable extreme” Typically:

Ship is “balanced” on the wave and a static analysis is done.

1.1 BPH L

Page 12: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Wave Elevation Profiles

The wave usually chosen for this analysis is a Trochoidal wave. It has a steeper crest and flatter trough.

Chosen because it gives a better representation of an actual sea wave than a sinusoidal wave.

Some use a cnoidal wave for shallow water as it has even steeper crests.

Page 13: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Trochoidal vs. Sine Wave

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Lenght (ft)

Wa

ve

He

igh

t (f

t)

Trochoidal Wave

Sinusoidal Wave

Page 14: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Sagging Wave

Excess Weight Amidships - Excess Buoyancy on the Ends

Tension

Compression

Page 15: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Hogging Wave

Excess Buoyancy Amidships - Excess Weight on the Ends

Tension

Compression

Page 16: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Weight Curve Generation

The weight curve can be generated by numerous methods:

Distinct Items (same method as for LCG)

Parabolic approximation

Trapezoidal approximation

Biles Method (similar to trapezoidal)

They all give similar results for shear and bending moment calculations. Select based on the easiest in your situation.

Page 17: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Distinct Item Method

ITEM Material units wt/unit WT LCG VCG LMOM VMOMGROUP C - JOINERY WORK

Forward cabin berth flat composite 35 0.77 27 10.50 1.25 282.98 33.69

mattress 35 3.00 105 10.50 1.50 1102.50 157.50

shelf p&s composite w/veneer 12 1.02 12 12.00 2.50 146.88 30.60

verticals p&s composite w/veneer 34 1.02 35 12.00 1.00 416.16 34.68

desk composite w/veneer 4 1.28 5 14.50 2.50 74.24 12.80

supports and hardware 5 14.50 2.50 72.50 12.50

hanging locker composite w/veneer 27 1.28 35 15.00 2.00 518.40 69.12

rod & hardware 10 15.00 3.00 150.00 30.00

cabinet composite w/veneer 17 1.02 17 16.75 3.00 290.45 52.02

door blkhd composite w/veneer 25 1.85 46 17.25 2.00 791.43 91.76

drawers wood 10 5.00 50 15.00 0.50 750.00 25.00

sole plywood & teak 29 2.50 71 16.40 -0.50 1168.50 -35.63

overhead honeycomb/vynal 24 0.50 12 17.00 6.25 204.00 75.00

Each component is located by its l, t and v position and weight

Can be misleading for long components

Page 18: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Example Weight Curve

120K Bbl TAO Weight Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-1000100200300400500600700

Feet from FP (+ Aft)

Dis

trib

ute

d W

eig

ht

(LT

/ft)

Weight Curve

Displacement =

LCG =

27450

299.3

LT

ft aft FP

1/19/99

Page 19: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

For each weight item, need W, lcg, fwd and aft

Weight Item Information

fwd

W

aft

lcg

FP

Page 20: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Trapezoid Method

Models weight item as a trapezoid

Best used for semi-concentrated weight items

Need the following information: Item weight – W (or mass, M) Location of weight centroid wrt FP - lcg Forward boundary wrt FP - fwd Aft boundary wrt FP - aft

lcg must be in middle 1/3 of trapezoid

Page 21: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Trapezoid Method

Find l and x

Solve for wf and wa so trapezoid’s area equals W and the centroid is at the lcg lcg

x

fwd

aft

l/2l

wf

wa

FP

wW

l

Wx

l

wW

l

Wx

l

a

f

6

6

2

2

G

2lflcgx

Page 22: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Biles Method

Used for weight items which are nearly continuous over the length of the ship.

Assumes that weight decreases near bow & stern.

Assumes that there is a significant amount of parallel middle body.

Models the material with two trapezoids and a rectangle.

Page 23: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

Biles Method

l

3

1.2h

l

3

l

3

wfwa

FP

lcg

G

x

aft

l

xhw

l

xhw

l

wh af 7

546.0

7

546.0

Page 24: Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis. Basic Relationships Model the hull as a Free-Free box beam.  Beam on an elastic foundation Must maintain

The Three Types of Structure

Characteristics Primary Structure

Secondary Structure

Tertiary Structure

In-plane rigidity Quasi-infinite Finite Small

Loading In-plane Normal Normal

Stresses Tension, Compression and Shear

Bending and Shear

Bending, Shear and Membrane

Examples Hull shell, deck, blkhd, tank top

Stiffeners on blkhd, shell

Unstiffened shell

Boundaries Undetermined Primary structure Secondary Structure