hum. reprod.-2008-zhang-2024-30

7
Evaluation of the efficacy of a danazol-loaded intrauterine contraceptive device on adenomyosis in an ICR mouse model Xinmei Zhang 1 , Hong Yuan 2 , Lin Deng 1 , Fuqiang Hu 2 , Junyan Ma 1 and Jun Lin 1,3 1 Department of Gynecology, Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, People’s Republic of China; 2 Institute of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, People’s Republic of China 3 Correspondence address. Tel: þ86-571-87061501/2131; Fax: þ86-571-87061878; E-mail: [email protected] BACKGROUND: Danazol, a synthetic steroid with antigonadotrophic properties, has been widely used for the treatment of endometriosis and adenomyosis. However, the local application of danazol to the uterus to treat adenomyosis is con- troversial. The objective of this study is to develop an effective treatment for adenomyosis using danazol via intrau- terine contraceptive device (IUCD) delivery. METHODS: An adenomyosis animal model was established using Institute for Cancer Research, Swiss-derived (ICR) mice, grafted with a single pituitary gland (n 5 30). Four months after grafting, IUCDs with three different quantities of danazol were prepared and used to treat the ICR mice with adenomyosis. After 2 months of treatment with a danazol-loaded IUCD, the number of adenomyosis nodules and the hematoxylin-eosin staining scores were measured and compared with mice given daily oral danazol and controls (no adenomyosis). RESULTS: As the danazol dose increased, the nodule number decreased reaching significance at a dose of 2.0 mg per 20 g body weight (P 5 0.002). When compared with oral administration, the plasma danazol concentrations with IUCD delivery were low and stable. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that an IUCD loaded with an appropriate dose of danazol may be an effective treatment for adenomyosis and that human trials are warranted. Keywords: danazol; adenomyosis; mouse; animal model; intrauterine contraceptive device Introduction Adenomyosis is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma in the myometrium of the uterus. The exact etiology and pathogenesis of adenomyosis remains unclear. Clinical symptoms include dysmenorrhea, hypermenorrhea and infertility, and treatment frequently involves hysterectomy (Ferenczy, 1998). However, this option is inappropriate in young or nulliparous women who wish to preserve their uterus. In this situation, current treatment options include GnRH analogs, oral danazol or conservative surgery where a localized area of adenomyosis can be demarcated. This type of surgery is technically difficult and of no benefit in the common situation where adenomyosis is diffusely distributed through the myometrium. The available drugs have frequent side effects and require long-term administration (Wood, 1998). Compared with current drug treatments, increased efficacy and reduced side effects might be achieved by sustained delivery to the uterus itself. Igarashi et al. (2000) reported that adenomyosis could be treated with 300–400 mg of danazol loaded onto an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD). In their study, they treated 14 adenomyosis patients with dysmenorrhea, hypermenorrhea or infertility. During the treatment, blood danazol levels were undetectable, ovulation was not inhibited and no side effects were reported. The danazol-loaded IUCD was effective at reducing uterine size and dysmenorrhea in 9 of 10 cases. Pregnancy occurred in three cases after removal of the IUCD. A danazol-loaded vaginal ring (Igarashi et al., 1998) and IUCD (Cobellis et al., 2004) have also been tested in patients with endometriosis with encouraging results that local appli- cation of danazol via vaginal or intrauterine drug delivery represents an appealing option. Danazol is a derivative of the synthetic steroid ethisterone. It has strong antigonadotrophic properties (Dmowski, 1990) and has been widely used as a treatment for endometriosis (Farquhar, 2007) and adenomyosis (Matalliotakis et al., 2003). Oral danazol has been shown to suppress the pituitary-ovarian axis by inhibiting the production of both pituitary gonado- trophins and suppressing ovulation (Franchimont and Cramilion, 1997; Nomura et al., 2006). As danazol is relatively insoluble in water, undergoes hepatic metabolism and has low oral bioavail- ability, high oral doses are required to achieve effective blood # The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] 2024 Human Reproduction Vol.23, No.9 pp. 2024– 2030, 2008 doi:10.1093/humrep/den208 Advance Access publication on June 14, 2008 by guest on November 14, 2015 http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/ Downloaded from

Upload: putri-nilam-sari

Post on 16-Jul-2016

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Hum. Reprod.-2008-Zhang-2024-30

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hum. Reprod.-2008-Zhang-2024-30

Evaluation of the efficacy of a danazol-loaded intrauterinecontraceptive device on adenomyosis in an ICRmouse model

Xinmei Zhang1, Hong Yuan2, Lin Deng1, Fuqiang Hu2, Junyan Ma1 and Jun Lin1,3

1Department of Gynecology, Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, People’s

Republic of China; 2Institute of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006,

People’s Republic of China

3Correspondence address. Tel: þ86-571-87061501/2131; Fax: þ86-571-87061878; E-mail: [email protected]

BACKGROUND: Danazol, a synthetic steroid with antigonadotrophic properties, has been widely used for the treatmentof endometriosis and adenomyosis. However, the local application of danazol to the uterus to treat adenomyosis is con-troversial. The objective of this study is to develop an effective treatment for adenomyosis using danazol via intrau-terine contraceptive device (IUCD) delivery. METHODS: An adenomyosis animal model was established usingInstitute for Cancer Research, Swiss-derived (ICR) mice, grafted with a single pituitary gland (n 5 30). Fourmonths after grafting, IUCDs with three different quantities of danazol were prepared and used to treat the ICRmice with adenomyosis. After 2 months of treatment with a danazol-loaded IUCD, the number of adenomyosisnodules and the hematoxylin-eosin staining scores were measured and compared with mice given daily oraldanazol and controls (no adenomyosis). RESULTS: As the danazol dose increased, the nodule number decreasedreaching significance at a dose of 2.0 mg per 20 g body weight (P 5 0.002). When compared with oral administration,the plasma danazol concentrations with IUCD delivery were low and stable. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggestthat an IUCD loaded with an appropriate dose of danazol may be an effective treatment for adenomyosis and thathuman trials are warranted.

Keywords: danazol; adenomyosis; mouse; animal model; intrauterine contraceptive device

Introduction

Adenomyosis is defined as the presence of endometrial glands

and stroma in the myometrium of the uterus. The exact etiology

and pathogenesis of adenomyosis remains unclear. Clinical

symptoms include dysmenorrhea, hypermenorrhea and

infertility, and treatment frequently involves hysterectomy

(Ferenczy, 1998). However, this option is inappropriate in

young or nulliparous women who wish to preserve their

uterus. In this situation, current treatment options include

GnRH analogs, oral danazol or conservative surgery where a

localized area of adenomyosis can be demarcated. This type

of surgery is technically difficult and of no benefit in the

common situation where adenomyosis is diffusely distributed

through the myometrium. The available drugs have frequent

side effects and require long-term administration (Wood,

1998). Compared with current drug treatments, increased

efficacy and reduced side effects might be achieved by

sustained delivery to the uterus itself.

Igarashi et al. (2000) reported that adenomyosis could be

treated with 300–400 mg of danazol loaded onto an intrauterine

contraceptive device (IUCD). In their study, they treated 14

adenomyosis patients with dysmenorrhea, hypermenorrhea or

infertility. During the treatment, blood danazol levels were

undetectable, ovulation was not inhibited and no side effects

were reported. The danazol-loaded IUCD was effective at

reducing uterine size and dysmenorrhea in 9 of 10 cases.

Pregnancy occurred in three cases after removal of the IUCD.

A danazol-loaded vaginal ring (Igarashi et al., 1998) and

IUCD (Cobellis et al., 2004) have also been tested in patients

with endometriosis with encouraging results that local appli-

cation of danazol via vaginal or intrauterine drug delivery

represents an appealing option.

Danazol is a derivative of the synthetic steroid ethisterone.

It has strong antigonadotrophic properties (Dmowski, 1990)

and has been widely used as a treatment for endometriosis

(Farquhar, 2007) and adenomyosis (Matalliotakis et al., 2003).

Oral danazol has been shown to suppress the pituitary-ovarian

axis by inhibiting the production of both pituitary gonado-

trophins and suppressing ovulation (Franchimont and Cramilion,

1997; Nomura et al., 2006). As danazol is relatively insoluble in

water, undergoes hepatic metabolism and has low oral bioavail-

ability, high oral doses are required to achieve effective blood

# The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected]

2024

Human Reproduction Vol.23, No.9 pp. 2024–2030, 2008 doi:10.1093/humrep/den208

Advance Access publication on June 14, 2008

by guest on Novem

ber 14, 2015http://hum

rep.oxfordjournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 2: Hum. Reprod.-2008-Zhang-2024-30

concentrations (Badawy et al., 1996a,b). Severe side effects

are common and length of treatment is limited. Recent

accumulated evidence suggests that danazol can act directly

on endometrial or endometriotic tissue in vitro to inhibit DNA

synthesis and induce apoptosis, exert direct effects to suppress

the growth of endometriotic implants and decrease monocyte-

enhanced endometrial proliferation in peripheral blood in vivo

(Surrey and Halme, 1992; Braun et al., 1994; Igarashi et al.,

1998; Tamaoka et al., 2000). In addition, danazol has been

shown to inhibit aromatase activity in endometriotic cells

in vitro (Murakami et al., 2006). On the basis of these direct

in vitro and in vivo actions of danazol on endometrial or

endometriotic tissue and the clinical findings described above,

we hypothesized that a danazol-loaded IUCD would be a more

effective and better tolerated treatment for adenomyosis than

current oral formulations.

In the present study, an Institute for Cancer Research, Swiss-

derived (ICR) mouse adenomyosis model was established, and

a suitably sized and loaded danazol IUCD was developed. The

danazol-loaded IUCD was placed into the adenomyosis mouse

uterus and the efficacy and pharmacokinetics were investi-

gated. In addition, we compared the IUCD-loaded dose with

the concentration of danazol in the uterine cavity to determine

an appropriate clinical dose of danazol for the treatment of

adenomyosis.

Materials and Methods

Animals and experimental procedures of adenomyosis model

Virgin female ICR mice maintained at Department of Biological

Sciences, Zhejiang University, were used in this study (Lu et al.,

2006). They were housed in plastic cages with wood chips under

controlled conditions (12 h of light from 6 A.M. to 6 P.M.) in accord-

ance with the principles outlined in the Guide for Animal Care and

Use of the Committee of the Graduate School of Science, Zhejiang

University. All mice had free access to a commercial diet and tap

water. All the experimental procedures conformed to the regulations

described in the Guide to the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals

of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Validation of ICR mice as a suitable model for adenomyosis, similar

to SHN mice

The mammary tumor prone SHN mouse strain is known to develop

adenomyosis spontaneously, especially after pituitary grafting

(Sakamoto et al., 1992). The SHN mouse strain, which has a high

incidence of mammary cancer, was originally developed by inbreed-

ing and selection from Swiss stock mice by Dr H. Nagasawa et al.

in 1976. However, SHN mice are only available in Japan (Nagasawa

et al., 1976; Nagasawa and Kusakawa, 2001). To determine whether

ICR mice can be used as an experimentally induced animal adeno-

myosis model like the SHN mice, we followed the experimental

procedures described by Kawahara et al. (2003b). We implanted a

single pituitary gland from age-matched male ICR mice into the

right uterine lumen of 27-week-old virgin female ICR mice. The

mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 4 months after implan-

tation and the uterine tissue investigated by naked eye observation

and histology using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The histology

confirmed that adenomyosis had developed in 19 of 20 ICR mice

(95%) and demonstrated that ICR mice, like SHN mice, can be used

as an animal model for adenomyosis.

Preparation of the danazol-loaded IUCD

Silicone gel (Shanghai Medical Rubber Institution, Shanghai China)

and its vulcanizing agent were mixed at the ratio of 9:11. A specific

quantity of danazol (Jiangsu Lianhuan pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,

Jiangsu China) was added and the final mixture coated onto a rod of

0.2 cm diameter polyvinyl chloride (College of Pharmaceutical

Sciences, Zhejiang University, Zhejaing China). The coated rod was

vulcanized for 24 h at room temperature.

Preparation of the oral danazol suspension

Danazol of 100 mg was suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2)

at the concentration of 10 mg/ml. This suspension was homogenized by

ultrasound in a water bath before intragastric (oral) administration.

Danazol-loaded IUCD release in vitro

To test the release rate of danazol from the IUCD in vitro, 1 cm of

IUCD loaded with danazol was cut and placed into 1000 ml of dissol-

ution medium containing 0.1% HCl and isopropanol at a ratio of 6:4,

and stirred at 60 rpm at 378C. After 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48,

72, 96, 120, 144 h, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 days, and 3 months,

1 ml of sample was removed and assayed for danazol after filtration

through a 0.45 mm membrane. The danazol concentration was

calculated using the high-performance liquid chromatography

(HPLC) method described below, according to a standard curve

with a range from 2.5 to 500 mg/ml (Fig. 1).

The HPLC conditions for danazol assay were as follows. Mobile

phase: methanol:water ¼ 78:22; chromatographic column: agilent

Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 (250 mm�4.6 mm, 5 mm); flow rate:

1 ml min21; detection wavelength: 285 nm; column temperature:

258C; injection volume: 20 ml.

The results showed an initial release of �20% of the loaded amount

within the first several days. The release then followed zero-order

kinetics at a slower release rate. The release rate decreased as the

danazol:carrier ratio decreased. Once this ratio reached 1:3, zero-order

release occurred at a rate of 1.4% per day for almost 2 months. This

formula was chosen for the in vivo studies.

Release of danazol-loaded IUCD in vivo

Twenty-four ICR female mice were used for the release test in vivo.

The mice were anaesthetized using i.p. injection of chloral hydrate.

The abdomen was disinfected, opened and the right uterus separated.

A small incision was made 0.5 cm above the junction of the right and

left uteri. A 1 cm long danazol-loaded IUCD (1.0 mg danazol/20 g

body weight) was inserted into the uterus through the incision and

Figure 1: The accumulated release in vitro of danazol from the differ-ent danazol-loaded IUCDs.

Intrauterine danazol and adenomyosis in a mouse model

2025

by guest on Novem

ber 14, 2015http://hum

rep.oxfordjournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 3: Hum. Reprod.-2008-Zhang-2024-30

the abdomen closed. The mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation

1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 28 and 56 days after surgery. The IUCD was removed

and placed into a centrifuge tube with 3 ml chloroform to extract

the remaining danazol. After the extraction, 0.5 ml water was added

to precipitate the silicon gel. The organic phase was transferred to

another tube after centrifugation at 750g. The solvent was evaporated

under a nitrogen blow, and the residue dissolved with 100 ml methanol

for the HPLC assay of danazol. The release rate of danazol from the

danazol-loaded IUCD was calculated.

Figure 2 shows the typical chromatogram of the HPLC assay. It

can be seen that there was no interference from the IUCD to the

peak of danazol, which demonstrates the assay method is good for

this in vivo release study. The drug release was determined by the

measurement of the residual danazol on the IUCD. This residue con-

tinually reduced over time, and reached 16.4% of the initial danazol

load at the 56th day of the administration (Fig. 3). The results demon-

strate that danazol release from the IUCD followed a controlled and

sustained release pattern, suggesting that side effects due to high

drug concentration release from the IUCD are unlikely and that the

treatment effect may last for 2 months.

Plasma pharmacokinetics of the danazol-loaded IUCD

Blood samples were taken from the mice used in the release study

immediately before and 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 28 and 56 days after IUCD

insertion. The blood was collected in tubes with heparin sodium, the

plasma separated by centrifugation, and the sample stored at

2208C. The danazol concentration in the plasma was assayed using

the HPLC method described above. The results show that the

plasma danazol concentration increased gradually, to reach a

steady-state level and a peak concentration of �70 ng/ml on the 4th

day after insertion (Fig. 4).

Treatment of adenomyosis with danazol-loaded IUCD in ICR mice

After the successful establishment of an experimentally induced ICR

mouse adenomyosis model, 34 ICR mice were recruited to investigate

the efficacy of a danazol-loaded IUCD on adenomyosis. Adenomyosis

was induced in 30 mice using the procedures described above. The

remaining four control ICR mice underwent surgery without pituitary

gland grafting. The 30 adenomyosis mice were randomized into six

groups 4 months after pituitary grafting. Group 1: five mice with no

IUCD inserted; Group 2: five mice treated with a blank IUCD;

Group 3: five mice treated with an IUCD containing 0.5 mg danazol

per 20 g body weight; Group 4: five mice treated with an IUCD con-

taining 1.0 mg danazol per 20 g body weight; Group 5: five mice

treated with an IUCD containing 2.0 mg danazol per 20 g body

weight; Group 6: five mice treated with 1.0 mg danazol per 20 g

body weight by intragastric administration each day. The dose of

danazol coated on IUCD was determined by calculating body

surface area (BSA). Using BSA, 1 mg danazol per 20 g body weight

for an ICR mouse each day equates to 390 mg danazol daily in a

70 kg woman. All mice were sacrificed 2 months after the medication,

and the uteri and ovaries weighed. The right uterus was examined

under �20 magnification for the extrauterine nodules characteristic

of advanced adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was confirmed histologically

using HE staining, and graded according to Mori’s classification

(Mori et al., 1998, 2001). Briefly, Grade 0, normal uterus; Grade 1,

uterus with an invasion of endometrial stromal cells into the inner

layer of myometrium; Grade 2, uterus with an invasion of endometrial

stromal and gland cells into the inner layer of myometrium; Grade 3,

uterus with an invasion of endometrial stromal cells in the connective

tissue space between the inner and outer myometrial layers; Grade 4,

uterus with cystic hyperplasia of the endometrial glands and small

nodules beneath the serosa; Grade 5, uterus with cystic hyperplasia

of the endometrial glands and a large number of subserosal nodules.

The plasma concentrations of danazol in the treated mice were mon-

itored according to the method described above.

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as the mean+SE. Differences between two

groups were evaluated using Bonferroni for non-paired data.

One-way analysis of variance was used for the evaluation of the

differences among multiple groups of non-paired data [11.5 Statistical

Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software; SPSS Co., USA].

Values of P , 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Figure 2: Typical HPLC chromatogram of danazol assay of thein vivo release sample obtained from mice.

Figure 3: In vivo release profiles of danazol-loaded IUCD in mice.

Figure 4: Plasma danazol concentration profiles after the implantationof the danazol-loaded IUCD into the mouse uterus.

Zhang et al.

2026

by guest on Novem

ber 14, 2015http://hum

rep.oxfordjournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 4: Hum. Reprod.-2008-Zhang-2024-30

Results

The uteri of the control group (without induction of adenomyosis)

showed normal contour and no congestion. The uteri of Group 1

(no treatment) and Group 2 (treated with blank IUCD) showed

distorted contour and obvious adenomyotic nodules extruding

from the serosal surface. The uteri in the groups treated with

the danazol-loaded IUCD showed improved contour, with

increased benefit with increasing danazol dose. The uteri in

Group 5 (2.0 mg/20 g) showed an almost smooth contour with

no obvious adenomyotic nodules. In contrast, the uteri in Group

6 (treated with a daily oral dose of 1.0 mg/20 g) still showed

distortion of the uterine contour and adenomyotic nodules

extruding from the serosal surface, although these were thinner

and less congestive than those in Group 1 (Figs 5 and 6).

The uterine wet weight and the final body weight of the

control group mice and the treated groups mice were not

significantly different (F ¼ 0.524, P ¼ 0.785; Table I).

However, the ratio of uterine wet weight to total body weight

(U/B) was significantly different between the control group

and the treated groups (F ¼ 7.835, P , 0.001). The U/B

ratio was significantly lower in the control group than in

Groups 2 (P ¼ 0.001), 3 (P ¼ 0.001) and 4 (P ¼ 0.026).

There was no difference in the U/B ratio between the control

group and Group 5 (P ¼ 1.000), 6 (P ¼ 1.000) or 7 (P ¼

0.136). Moreover, the ratio of U/B was significantly higher

in Group 2 than Group 5 (P ¼ 0.015) or 6 (P ¼ 0.006). The

ratio of U/B in Group 3 was also significantly higher than

that in Group 5 (P ¼ 0.016) or 6 (P ¼ 0.007).

The number of adenomyosis nodules and the HE scores

in Group 1 were 11.5+ 2.4 and 3.3+ 0.3, respectively

(Table I); in Group 2, 11.0+ 2.7 and 3.1+ 0.4; and in

Group 3, 10.0+ 2.2 and 2.9+ 0.4. Although the number of

adenomyosis nodules and the HE scores progressively

decreased as the dose of danazol incorporated in the IUCD

was increased, only Group 5 (5.6+ 1.1) was significantly

different from Group 1 (P ¼ 0.002). The decreased HE

scores only reached significance in Groups 4 (2.5+ 0.4, P ¼

0.044) and 5 (2.0+ 0.2, P , 0.001) when compared with

Group 1. In Group 6, neither the nodules nor the HE scores

were significantly different compared with Group 1.

Figure 5: Treatment efficacy of danazol-loaded IUCD on adenomyosis in an experimentally induced Institute for Cancer Research, Swiss-derived (ICR) mouse model.(A) Normal animal controls, normal uterine contour, smooth walls, no congestion; (B) Group 1: adenomyotic animal controls without treatment,distorted uterine contour, adenomyosis nodules extruding from the surface of the uterus with the implant; (C) Group 2: adenomyotic animalstreated with blank IUCD, distorted uterine contour, adenomyosis nodules extruding from the surface of the uterus with the implant; (D)Group 3: adenomyotic animals treated with 0.5 mg danazol IUCD/20 g body weight, slight improvement of the distorted uterine contour andextruding adenomyosis nodules; (E) Group 4: adenomyotic animals treated with 1.0 mg danazol IUCD/20 g body weight, marked improvementof the distorted uterine contour and extruding adenomyosis nodules; (F) Group 5: adenomyotic animals treated with 2.0 mg danazol IUCD/20 gbody weight, smooth uterine contour, rare and small adenomyosis nodules; (G) Group 6: adenomyotic animals treated with 1.0 mg danazol/20 gbody weight by daily intragastric (oral) administration, marked improvement of the distorted uterine contour and extruding adenomyosis nodules.Arrows: site of the IUCD.

Intrauterine danazol and adenomyosis in a mouse model

2027

by guest on Novem

ber 14, 2015http://hum

rep.oxfordjournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 5: Hum. Reprod.-2008-Zhang-2024-30

Two months after treatment, the mean levels of plasma

danazol in Groups 3, 4 and 5 were 42.1+ 3.9, 50.1+ 5.9

and 73.1+ 8.9 ng/ml, respectively (Fig. 7). The concen-

trations were significantly higher in Group 5 than those in

Groups 3 (P ¼ 0.002) and 4 (P ¼ 0.015). However, there was

no difference in plasma concentration between Groups 3 and

4 (P ¼ 1.000). The mean plasma danazol concentrations in

the mice treated with oral danazol was 480.0+ 18.7 ng/ml,

which was substantially higher than the levels from mice

treated with the danazol-loaded IUCD (P , 0.001).

Figure 6: Classification of progression of adenomyosis in an experimentally induced ICR mouse model.(A) Grade 0, normal uterus; (B) Grade 1, uterus with an invasion of endometrial stromal cells into the inner layer of myometrium; (C) Grade 2,uterus with an invasion of endometrial stromal and gland cells into the inner layer of myometrium; (D) Grade 3, uterus with an invasion of endo-metrial stromal cells in the connective tissue space between the inner and outer myometrial layers; (E) Grade 4, uterus with cystic hyperplasia ofthe endometrial glands and small nodules beneath the serosa. Arrow: adenomyosis lesion. Adenomyosis was confirmed histopathologically usingHE staining (�100) and was graded according to the standard of Mori’s classification (Mori et al., 1998).

Table I. Comparisons of the uterine wet weight, final body weight, adenomyosis nodules and HE score among the controls and the treated groups.

Groups Uterine wet weight (mg) Final body weight (g) Ratio (U/B*) Nodules (N) HE** score

Controls 79.3+9.6 36.3+2.5 2.2+0.1 / 0Group 1# 93.0+5.7 37.3+2.2 2.5+0.1 11.5+2.4 3.3+0.3Group 2 91.8+5.6 37.0+1.3 2.5+0.1 11.0+2.7 3.1+0.4Group 3 88.6+5.4 36.9+1.8 2.4+0.1 10.0+2.2 2.9+0.4Group 4 86.0+5.7 37.7+1.3 2.3+0.1 7.8+1.5 2.5+0.4Group 5 82.2+5.9 36.6+2.2 2.2+0.1 5.6+1.1 2.0+0.2Group 6 89.6+6.1 38.0+1.2 2.4+0.1 8.6+1.1 2.4+0.4

U/B*, uterine wet weight/final body weight; HE**, hematoxylin-eosin; Group 1#, normal animals without IUCD; Group 2, adenomyotic animals treated withblank IUCD; Group 3, adenomyotic animals treated with 0.5 mg danazol IUCD/20 g body weight; Group 4, adenomyotic animals treated with 1.0 mg danazolIUCD/20 g body weight; Group 5, adenomyotic animals treated with 2.0 mg danazol IUCD/20 g body weight; Group 6, adenomyotic animals treated with1.0 mg danazol/20 g body weight by daily intragastric (oral) administration.

Zhang et al.

2028

by guest on Novem

ber 14, 2015http://hum

rep.oxfordjournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 6: Hum. Reprod.-2008-Zhang-2024-30

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the

efficacy of local application of danazol in an experimentally

induced ICR mouse adenomyosis model. The establishment of

an animal adenomyosis model is a prerequisite for investigating

the treatment efficacy of the danazol-loaded IUCD on adenomyo-

sis. Although a variety of animals can be used as models for ade-

nomyosis (Kida, 1994; Koujyo et al., 1998; Kawahara et al.,

2003a; Zhou et al., 2003; Greaves and White, 2006), only SHN

mice grafted with a pituitary gland are currently well-established

for this purpose (Mori et al., 1984; Singtripop et al., 1993). Our

results using ICR mice showed that adenomyosis was developed

and confirmed histologically in 19 (95%) of the 20 ICR mice 4

months after grafting with a pituitary gland. This incidence of ade-

nomyosis is comparable with the SHN mouse model (Singtripop

et al., 1992). It is therefore suggested that ICR mice, like SHN

mice, are a good animal model for adenomyosis.

The in vitro release test showed that danazol was continually

and steadily released from the danazol-loaded IUCD over

3 months when the ratio of danazol/carrier was 1:3. The

in vivo release test showed that the residue of danazol on the

silicon bar continually decreased over time to 16.4% of total

danazol dose at the 56th day of administration. Moreover, it

was found that the concentration of plasma danazol gradually

increased to a peak level of �70 ng/ml on the 4th day,

which was then maintained for 2 months, indicating an effec-

tive treatment period of 2 months. These results demonstrate

that a danazol-loaded IUCD would be an effective local drug

delivery system for the treatment of adenomyosis.

Oral danazol therapy is accepted as an effective treatment for

adenomyosis. However, due to its frequent side effects, it is

rarely used clinically for this purpose. In the present study,

the distorted uterine contour and adenomyosis nodules of the

ICR mice gradually resolved over the treatment period and

with increasing danazol dose. Maximal effect was achieved

with an IUCD loaded with 2.0 mg danazol per 20 g body

weight and this was more effective than intragastric (oral)

administration. Although the number of adenomyosis nodules

and the HE scores were decreased as the dose of danazol

coated on IUCD increased, this only reached significance in

the mice treated with a 2.0 mg danazol per 20 g body weight

IUCD. However, as neither the nodules nor the HE scores

were significantly decreased in mice treated with intragastric

danazol, it can be concluded that local application of danazol

via an IUCD had at least equivalent and possibly higher

efficacy in treating adenomyosis when compared with oral

delivery in this ICR mouse model.

Recent evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies has

demonstrated that danazol acts directly on endometrial or endo-

metriotic tissue to inhibit DNA synthesis and induce

apoptosis. It also suppresses the growth of endometriotic implants

(Surrey and Halme, 1992; Braun et al., 1994; Tamaoka et al.,

2000). Although the pathogenesis of adenomyosis remains

unclear, the theory of endo-myometrial junction invagination of

the endometrium is well accepted. It is suggested that intrauterine

danazol exerts its treatment effect when absorbed to the sites of

adenomyosis loci through the endo-myometrial junction.

Our in vivo release test confirmed that release from the

danazol-loaded IUCD resulted in local and plasma danazol

concentrations remaining stable for 2 months, which ensures

a sustained local treatment effect. Moreover, the results

showed that plasma danazol levels were all ,80 ng/ml,

although the levels did increase as the dose of danazol incor-

porated in the IUCD increased. Mice treated with intragastric

danazol had mean plasma levels over six times higher than

those with the highest danazol IUCD dose. It is therefore

reasonable to predict that local treatment with a danazol

IUCD would have fewer side effects than oral treatment.

This is supported by previous reports from small clinical

trials (Igarashi et al., 1998, 2000; Cobellis et al., 2004).

In summary, we have demonstrated that ICR mice are a

suitable animal model for adenomyosis, that a danazol-loaded

IUCD is a reliable method of administration for danazol and

that a danazol-loaded IUCD is an effective way to treat adenomyo-

sis in ICR mice. These results are encouraging and pave the way

for an alternative route of danazol administration in humans. Once

an appropriate dose of danazol has been determined, the local

application of danazol via an IUCD may represent an appealing

treatment option for women with adenomyosis.

Author’s contribution

X.Z. is responsible for writing this manuscript and experimental

design. H.Y. is responsible for the preparation and release test

in vivo of danazol-loaded IUCD. L.D. is responsible for the

establishment of adenomyosis ICR mouse model.

F.H. is responsible for the release test in vitro of danazol-

loaded IUCD. J.M. is responsible for collecting data. J.L. is

chief designer.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Susan Evans (The Endometriosis Care Center ofAustralia) and Associate professor Jun Shao (Department of Pharmacyand Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Allied HealthProfessions, St John’s University, NY 11704, USA) for providing usgood advice and helping us with our English.

Figure 7: Comparisons of the danazol levels in plasma 2 months aftertreatment among the different groups.

Intrauterine danazol and adenomyosis in a mouse model

2029

by guest on Novem

ber 14, 2015http://hum

rep.oxfordjournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 7: Hum. Reprod.-2008-Zhang-2024-30

Funding

This work was supported by Science and Technology

Department of Zhejiang Province (2004-C30039).

References

Badawy SIF, Ghorab MM, Adeyeye CM. Bioavailability of danazol-hydroxypropyl-b-cylodextrin complex by different routes of administration.Int J Pharm 1996a;145:137–143.

Badawy SIF, Ghorab MM, Adeyeye CM. Characterization and bioavailabilityof danazol-hydroxypropyl-b-cylodextrin coprecipitates. Int J Pharm1996b;128:45–54.

Braun DP, Gebel H, Dmowski WP. Effect of danazol in vitro and in vivo onmonocyte-mediated enhancement of endometrial cell proliferation inwomen with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1994;62:89–95.

Cobellis L, Razzi S, Fava A, Severi FM, Igarashi M, Petraglia F. Adanazol-loaded intrauterine device decreases dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, anddyspareunia associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2004;82: 239–240.

Dmowski WP. Danazol. A synthetic steroid with diverse biologic effects.J Reprod Med 1990;35:69–74.

Farquhar C. Endometriosis. BMJ 2007;334:249–253.

Ferenczy A. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:312–322.

Franchimont P, Cramilion C. The effect of danazol on anterior pituitaryfunction. Fertil Steril 1997;28:814–817.

Greaves P, White IN. Experimental adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin ObstetGynaecol 2006;20:503–510.

Igarashi M, Iizuka M, Abe Y, Ibuki Y. Novel vaginal danazol ring therapyfor pelvic endometriosis, in particular deeply infiltrating endometriosis.Hum Reprod 1998;13:1952–1956.

Igarashi M, Abe Y, Fukuda M, Ando A, Miyasaka M, Yoshida M. Novelconservative medical therapy for uterine adenomyosis with a danazol-loaded intrauterine device. Fertil Steril 2000;74:412–413.

Kawahara R, Matsuda M, Mori T. Increase in the number of integrinbeta1-immunoreactive monocyte-lineage cells in experimentally-inducedadenomyosis in mice. Life Sci 2003a;73:907–916.

Kawahara R, Matsuda M, Imaoka T, Mori T. Up-regulation of thymosin beta 4gene expression in experimentally-induced uterine adenomyosis in mice.In Vivo 2003b;17:561–565.

Kida H. Histological analysis of spontaneous adenomyosis-like changes inrecombinant inbred mouse uterus (SMXA mouse)-a novel animal foradenomyosis. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 1994;46:323–330.

Koujyo T, Hatakeyama S, Yamada H, Iwabuchi K, Kajino K, Ogasawara K, OnoeK, Fujimoto S. Induction of endometriosis and adenomyosis by transvaginalpituitary transplantation in mice with and without natural killer cell activity.Am J Reprod Immunol 1998; 40:441–446.

Lu XE, Ning WX, Dong MY, Liu AX, Jin F, Huang HF. Vascular endothelialgrowth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-2 expedite formation ofendometriosis in the early stage ICR mouse model. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1175–1181.

Matalliotakis IM, Kourtis AI, Panidis DK. Adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol ClinNorth Am 2003;30:63–82.

Mori T, Ohta Y, Nagasawa H. Ultrastructural changes in uterine myometriumof mice with experimentally-induced adenomyosis. Experientia 1984;15:1385–1387.

Mori T, Kyokuwa M, Nagasawa H. Animal model of uterine adenomyosis:induction of the lesion in rats by ectopic pituitary isografting. Lab AnimSci 1998;48:64–68.

Mori T, Yamasaki S, Masui F, Matsuda M, Sasabe H, Zhou YF. Suppression ofthe development of experimentally induced uterine adenomyosis by a novelmatrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, ONO-4817, in mice. Exp Biol Med2001;226:429–433.

Murakami K, Nomura K, Shinohara K, Kasai T, Shozu M, Inoue M. Danazolinhibits aromatase activity of endometriosis-derived stromal cells by acompetitive mechanism. Fertil Steril 2006;86:291–297.

Nagasawa H, Kusakawa S. Two inbred strains of mice with high and lowmammary tumor potentials established from the same basal stock of Swissalbino (SHN and SLN): history of mammary tumorigenesis andreproduction after the 30th generation of full-sib mating. Exp Anim2001;50:167–171.

Nagasawa H, Yanai R, Taniguchi H, Tokuzen R, Nakahara W. Two-wayselection of a stock of Swiss albino mice for mammary tumorigenesis:establishment of two new strains (SHN and SLN). J Natl Cancer Inst1976;57:425–430.

Nomura K, Murakami K, Shozu M, Nakama T, Yui N, Inoue M. Localapplication of danazol-loaded hyaluronic acid hydrogel to endometriosis ina rat model. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1157–1167.

Sakamoto S, Mori T, Singtripop T, Kawashima S, Suzuki S, Kudo H,Sawaki K, Nagasawa H. Increase of DNA synthesis in uterineadenomyosis in mice with ectopic pituitary isograft. Acta Anat (Basel)1992;145:162–166.

Singtripop T, Mori T, Sakamoto S, Sassa S, Park MK, Kawashima S.Suppression of the development of uterine adenomyosis by danazoltreatment in mice. Life Sci 1992;51:1119–1125.

Singtripop T, Mori T, Shiraishi K, Park MK, Kawashima S. Age-relatedchanges in gonadotropin, prolactin and growth hormone levels withreference to the development of uterine adenomyosis in female SHN mice.In Vivo 1993;7:147–150.

Surrey ES, Halme J. Direct effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate, danazol,and leuprolide acetate on endometrial stromal cell proliferation in vitro.Fertil Steril 1992;58:273–278.

Tamaoka Y, Orikasa H, Sumi Y, Sakakura K, Kamei K, Nagatani M, Ezawa S.Direct effect of danazol on endometrial hyperplasia in adenomyotic women:treatment with danazol containing intrauterine device. Hum Cell2000;13:127–133.

Wood C. Surgical and medical treatment of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update1998;4:323–336.

Zhou YF, Mori T, Kudo H, Asakai R, Sassa S, Sakamoto S. Effects ofangiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 on the development of uterineadenomyosis in mice. Fertil Steril 2003;80:788–794.

Submitted on November 15, 2007; resubmitted on February 21, 2008; acceptedon March 28, 2008

Zhang et al.

2030

by guest on Novem

ber 14, 2015http://hum

rep.oxfordjournals.org/D

ownloaded from