human resource management notes 14

Upload: bevinj

Post on 03-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    1/15

    Unit 14: Groups and Group Dynamics

    Structure:

    14.1 Introduction

    Objectives14.2 Meaning and Characteristics of Group

    SAQs

    14.3 The Types of Groups

    14.3.1Formal Work Groups

    14.3.2Informal Work Groups

    SAQs

    14.4 Group Characteristics

    SAQs14.5 Group Decision-making

    14.6.1 Advantages of Group Decision-making

    SAQs

    14.6 Group Dynamics

    14.7.1Principles of Group Dynamics

    14.7 Summary

    14.8. TQs

    14.9 Answers to SAQs and TQs

    14.1 Introduction

    The concept of a group is as old as civilisation itself. The primitive man recognised the

    importance of group as a basic unit for his survival. The primates had their groups for hunting

    and protecting their species from wild beasts. With the advancement of civilisation, various

    racial groups developed in different parts of the hemisphere and nurtured different but distinct

    cultures. If we glance at the history of various countries, it would be clear that, despite heavy

    odds, the culture of different countries throve in different racial groups. The characteristics and

    functions of group are surely worthy of study. This unit focuses on group dynamics and

    principles of group dynamics.

    Objectives

    After studying this unit, you will be able to:

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    2/15

    Understanding Groups as they exit in organizations

    Identify group characteristics.

    Explain group dynamics and principles of group dynamics.

    14.2 Meaning and Characteristics of Group

    A group refers to two or more persons who interact for a common explicit purpose. A mere

    collection of individuals assembled in a place - on the street, at a bus stand, or in railway

    station waiting room - does not constitute a group because although people are physically

    gathered together, they do not jointly pursue a common objective or share a common

    feeling. Kimball Young defines a group as "two or more persons in a state of social

    interaction." T.M. Newcomb feels that 'a group consists of two or more persons who share

    norms about certain things with one another and whose social roles are closely interlocking.' In

    the words of W.J.H. Sprott, a group is 'plurality of persons who interact with anyone else.'

    Sherif and Sherif define group as a social unit which consists of a number of individuals

    who stand in definite status and role relationships to one another and which possesses a set

    of values or norms of its own regulating the behaviour of individual members, at least in

    matters of consequence to the group.

    Characteristics of a Group: The essential characteristics of a small group are: 1) two or more

    people, 2) who interact with one another, 3) share some common ideology, and

    4) see themselves as a group.

    Characteristic 2) means that the members at least occasionally meet, talk, and do things

    together. They do not all have to meet at the same time, but in order to be a group member, a

    person must have occasional contact with one or more of the others.

    Characteristic 3) means that the group members have something in common. They might

    share a goal, such as protecting their jobs: or a concern, like security or the same prejudices

    or values or they might face a common threat. Whatever its basis, the group has something

    in common which gives it and its members some identity.

    Characteristic 4) results from 2) and 3). People who interact with one another and who share

    some common ideology are usually attracted to one another. The reinforcement they receive

    from interacting with one another leads them to identify with one another and eventually to

    perceive themselves as something special, as a unique group.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    3/15

    The groups can provide, with or without the conscious knowledge of their members, a

    means of fulfilling many of the needs of the individuals in them, such as: 1) affinitive needs

    provided by the group through friendship between individuals within it 2) egoistic needs

    which may be fulfilled through the development of self-esteem and status as the result of

    membership in the group-through opportunity for individual contributions to group

    functioning 3) some functional needs such as aid in daily activities, help in adjustment to

    work routine, or even the avoidance of boredom can be met by the group 4) cognitive needs

    may be satisfied by motivation.

    Organizational members bring with them a variety of needs and because group formation

    can fulfil many of these needs, the groups serve the following purpose. They provide:

    1. An outlet for affiliation needs i.e. needs for friendship, support and love.

    2. A means of developing, enhancing or confirming a sense of identity and maintaining

    self-esteem. Through group membership, a person can gain status, and thereby enhance

    his sense of self-esteem.

    3. A means of establishing and testing reality through developing consensus among group

    members, uncertain parts of social environment can be made "real" and parts of social

    environment can be made "real" and "stable." Each person can validate his own

    perceptions and feelings best by checking them with others.

    4. A means of increasing security and sense of power of coping with a common and

    powerful enemy or threat.

    5. A means of getting same job done that members need to have done: Such as g athering

    information or helping out when some are sick or tired or avoiding boredom and

    providing stimulation to one another or bringing new members of the organisation

    quickly into the informal structure.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    4/15

    Self Assessment Questions I

    14.3 The Types of Groups

    Groups may be classified in many different ways: the basis for differentiation may be purpose

    or goal extent of structuring legal organisation or setting. Classification of group is a

    starting point for a better knowledge of nature and function of a group of interacting

    individuals.

    There are two distinct types of work groups, formal and informal. It is important, however, to

    recognize that both types have certain fundamental characteristics in common. All groups:

    1. have leaders

    2. have followers

    3. strive toward some goal or goals

    4. have ideas about what it takes to achieve the goals

    5. communicate expectations to members

    6. Satisfy some form of member needs.

    14.3.1 Formal Work Groups

    In the previous chapters, the organizing function of management was identified as the

    process that arranges people in an acceptable pattern so that they can perform required

    activities. Organizing unites workers by means of interrelated tasks. Its goal is the creation of

    behavioural relationship among persons that will best enable them to wor k together

    productively and wit h maximum per sonal satisfaction.

    In other words, the end goal of the manager's organizing responsibility is to create formal

    work groups that are necessary to achieve the organisations goals. Formal work groups are

    sub-divisions of organizations. The following are the characteristics of formal work groups:

    1) they are sanctioned by some authority 2) there is a prescribed division of labour 3)

    1. _____________feels that 'a group consists of two or more persons who share norms

    about certain things with one another and whose social roles are closely interlocking2. People who interact with one another and who share some common ideology are

    usually ___________________________________.3. Through group membership, a person can gain status, and thereby enhance his sense

    of_____________________.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    5/15

    individuals are assigned specific responsibilities, 4) there are stable and consistent personal

    interactions, and 5) provisions are made for rewarding the group membership.

    The formal work group has a designated leader who supervises group members, mediates

    rewards and punishments, and is responsible for group performance to a higher authority in

    the organization. Group members may or may not have a say in the objectives, rules of

    behaviour, task assignments, or performance standards of the group. Examples of formal

    work groups are: the professors in an academic department of a college, a surgical team in a

    hospital, and the two partners in a police patrol car.

    14.3.2 Informal Work Groups

    Informal work groups are a component of informal organizations. Informal groups are loosely

    organized groups such as bowling teams and social clubs that arise apart from the formal

    organization to which members of the informal group may belong. They exist because the

    formal groups established within the organization frequently fail to satisfy human needs to

    a sufficient degree, and also because the organizational structure rarely anticipates everything

    that must be done if the organization is to meet all of its objectives. From the perspective of

    the worker, informal work groups provide a source of satisfaction for security needs, social

    needs, and esteem needs.

    Informal Work Groups and Security Needs: Informal groups help to support their members

    and to protect them from outside pressure and authority. The group insulates the individualfrom a hostile work environment. When people first enter an organization, they may feel

    considerable anxiety. Their surroundings are unfamiliar, the job is new, and the future

    is uncertain. New employees often seek out an existing group to join for help in the

    orientation process.

    Informal Work Groups and Social Needs: Many jobs restrict communication and interaction

    among workers. This makes it difficult for people to form work friendships and to satisfy

    their need for companionship. People want to feel they belong, and it is easy to feel such

    identification with a small social group in which relationships are based on shared interests and

    values. In most offices, social groups are an inevitable occurrence. Social group members

    enjoy each other's company as the work is performed. They may also eat lunch as a group, take

    breaks at the same time, or share a social life outside the organization.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    6/15

    Informal Work Groups and Esteem Needs: Beyond providing a sense of belonging, the informal

    group can also be a source of status or prestige for its membership. This is especially true if the

    group is well-known in the larger organization, if outsiders are anxious to join the group, and if

    acceptance into the group is difficult to achieve. To the extent that it provides an opportunity for

    assumption of leadership, the informal group is a source of egoistic need satisfaction. Finally,

    the need to achieve can be partially satisfied by the informal group.

    Advantages: Informal work groups increase the employee's sense of security and belonging and

    often enable the work to be done more effectively. Another advantage, not previously

    mentioned, is that the informal group can assist the manager in providing discipline. For

    instance, group members who notice that an individual is taking advantage of a situation in a

    way that could cause them all to lose a prized benefit may step in to correct the problem before

    the manager is even aware that it exists. In one office, the boss has for years successfully

    maintained a "no time clock" policy, in which employees are placed on their own recognizance

    to work an eight-hour day. If someone comes in half an hour late, takes a long lunch, or leaves

    early one day, no one says anything. Everyone expects that the person will make up the time as

    he or she sees fit. This form of compromise works in this situation because the employees are

    highly motivated and the office is not too large. But another reason it works is because there is a

    great deal of peer pressure (informal group norms) exerted on any individual who appears to be

    taking advantage of the policy.

    Disadvantages: The disadvantages of informal work groups can interfere with organizationaleffectiveness to the same degree that the advantages can contribute to it. These disadvantages

    arise whenever the goals of the group run counter to those of the established organization. This

    problem is especially evident whenever an attempt is made to implement planned change. The

    protection and social relationships provided by informal groups are often threatened by new

    plans that disrupt order and stability, create new procedures and standards of production, and

    interrupt the pattern of personal interactions on the job. The existence of informal groups can

    block worker co-operation with planned change by encouraging outright resistance, foot-

    dragging, or "malicious compliance."

    In a nutshell, the informal group emerges whenever the formal group does not sufficiently

    satisfy on-the-job needs. It can be beneficial or detrimental depending on the degree to which

    workers agree with the policies of management. Managers should always be alert to the

    formation of informal groups because they are usually an indication that employee needs are

    not being met through the established structure. Although the manager should not try to

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    7/15

    manipulate informal groups, he or she should try to ascertain how they might have on the

    organization. The best approach is to be reasonable with employees and to consider their

    needs. Informal groups will emerge even where human relations are sound, but their

    presence will not be as disruptive as when they exist primarily in response to management

    insensitivity. One certain way to eliminate the negative consequences of informal groups is

    to make the formal group more effective in meeting both the needs of workers and the goals of

    the organization.

    Self Assessment Questions II

    14.4 Group Characteristics

    Several characteristics, concerning the composition and behaviour of the informal

    organization need to be noted. The informal organization has its goals, objectives, and

    authority patterns and these factors may or may not coincide with those of the formal

    structure. The design and actions of the informal organization have the capacity to be either

    supportive or detrimental to the goals of the formal organization. Since the informal

    organization exists to provide rewards, protection and preservation of other values for its

    members, formal and informal organization perceive benefits from working in a unified way

    with formal structure. The major elements of 'group behaviour' are discussed in the following

    paragraphs.

    1. Membership in the Group: Membership in the group is a selective process in which

    individuals are granted membership primarily on the basis of commonality of interests

    and willingness to be co-operative and to conform to the group norms. Individuals may

    have overlapping memberships in a number of informal groups, depending upon the

    frequency of contacts, the mutual interests shared and other factors.

    2. Emergent Leadership: The informal leader specifically serves two facilitating functions:

    first, he initiates action and provides direction. If there are differences of opinions on a

    1. The end goal of the manage r's organizi ng responsibility is to create formal work

    groups that are necessary to achieve the _______________________

    2. ________________ exist because the formal groups established within the

    organization frequently fail to satisfy human needs to a sufficient degree, and also

    because the organizational structure rarely anticipates everything that must be done if theorganization is to meet all of its objectives.

    3. Informal work groups increase the employee's _____________________________________and often enable the work to be done more effectively.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    8/15

    group-related matter, the leader attempts to compromise differences of opinion and moves

    the group toward accomplishing its goals. Second, he communicates the groups' beliefs

    about policies, the job, the organization the supervision, and other related matters to

    non-members (such as members of other groups, supervisory personnel and the union).

    3. Formal Hierarchy: All groups have a certain degree of formal organization. For instance,

    consultation and discussions on important issues are held with the "lieutenants". It is

    through these sub-leaders that messages are communicated to the members of the

    group. The individuals performing leadership roles possess prestige because of their role.

    They are ranked by group members as being at a particular level in the group status

    hierarchy.

    4. Group Has Some Activity or Task to Perform: A group does something which may be

    related to its job or unconnected with it. For example, it may go on a picnic or movie or

    simply engage in a gossip session. It undertakes these tasks to serve some ends in

    purpo se. It ma y provide them wit h information and further social ties, or satisfy their

    social and affiliation needs or bring them protection against some type of threatening,

    oppressive forces, etc.

    5. Interaction: All people interact with one another. When such interaction takes place, there

    is a social transaction, in which one person responds to another. According to Berne,

    "people interact with each other in terms of three psychological positions or behavioural

    patterns known as ego status. These ego statuses are parent, adult and child, and a normalperson operates with some or all the three. Persons interacting with a parent ego are

    protective, dogmatic, evaluative and righteous. They prefer laws, rules and standards. The

    adult ego state is based upon reason and seeking and processing information, and on

    factual discussion. It views people as equal, worthy and reasonable human beings.

    The child ego state reflects the conditions and experiences of early childhood. It is

    dependent, rebellious, selfish and sometimes creative. It tends to seek approval, and

    grasps for immediate satisfactions.

    6. Group Norms Each informal group characteristically establishes group behaviour

    standards or norms, beliefs, traditions and attitudes to which it expects its members to

    conform. According to Luthens, "Norms are the ought tos of behaviour. They are

    prescriptions for acceptable behaviour determined by a group, institution, or society." In

    the opinion of Argyle, "Group norms are rules or guidelines of accepted behaviour which

    are established by a group and used to monitor the behaviour of its members." In a very

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    9/15

    structured, formalised group, these norms may become institutionalised into laws or

    operation laws. In other words, norm is an agreement among group membership as to

    how members in the group should behave. The more an individual complies with

    norms, the more one is accepting the group standards of behaviour. These standards are

    designed to achieve the goals of the group and to preserve and protect its value.

    i) Group Cohesiveness: Cohesiveness is the degree of attraction that the group has for each

    of its members. It is exemplified by such attitudes as loyalty to the group, a feeling

    of responsibility for group efforts, defending against outside attractions, friendliness, and

    congeniality. Cohesive work groups are powerful instruments that can be used for or

    against the formal organization.

    ii) Member Satisfaction: The end result of group membership is satisfaction of members. In

    a survey of 37 studies, Heslin and Dumply have shown specific relationship between work

    group member satisfaction and i) perceived freedom to participate, ii) perceived goal

    attainment and iii) status consensus.

    i) Perceived Freedom to Participate: A members' perception of freedom to

    participate influences need satisfaction. Individuals who perceived them selves as

    active participators reported to be more satisfied while those who perceive their

    freedom to participate to be insignificant typically were least satisfied members in a

    work group.

    ii) Perceived Goal Attainment: A group members perception at progress towards the

    achievement of desired goals is an important factor which is related to member

    satisfaction. Groups which progressed towards goals attainment showed higher

    levels of member satisfaction while members of groups not adequately progressing

    towards the attainment of group goals showed a lower satisfaction level.

    iii) Status Consensus: It is an agreement about the relative status of all group members.

    When the degree of status consensus within the group is low, member satisfaction

    tends to be low.

    The two authors concluded that status consensus is more readily achieved in groups where: i)the group task specialist is perceived to be competent by the membership ii) a leader

    emerges who plays a role that is considered an important group task, and iii) a leadership role

    emerges and is filled by an individual who concentrates on co-ordinating and maintaining the

    activities of the group.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    10/15

    Self Assessment Questions III

    14.5 Group Decision-making

    Most big decisions in organizations are made by groups rather than individuals. Even if a

    group of people does not formally sit together to thrash out a decision, several people usually

    provide input to any major decision. In general, decision- making by groups has proved

    superior to individual decision-making. Yet this generalization is not overwhelmingly true.

    Many talented and imaginative individuals do not require group discussion to make an

    effective decision.

    Advantages of Group Decision-making

    Groups often fare better than individuals in decision-making for several logical reasons. First,

    a greater variety of alternatives and solutions is considered. "Too many cooks may spoil the

    broth," but making broth involves a series of small decisions. Assume that your employer is

    forced to relocate because your present building is to be demolished. You would want to

    examine a wide variety of possibilities. If several knowledgeable people were brought

    into the decision-making process, you would uncover a number of worthwhile possibilities.

    Second, group decision-making is helpful in gaining acceptance and commitment. If you

    and your friends were planning a vacation together, you would probably have less bickering

    after the decisions were made, if it were a joint decision. If one person arbitrarily chose a

    lake-side cottage, the other member of the group would probably complain vigorously about

    the mosquitoes. If all agreed to the lake-side, the mosquitoes would probably be less

    bothersome. People tend to accept a decision when they have contributed to its making.

    Potential Problems with Group Decisions: Group decisions take longer than individual

    decisions and sometimes lead to a compromise decision of little value. In deciding where to

    relocate an office, one faction might endorse a move to an industrial park in suburbs.

    Another faction might urge that the company stay downtown. A compromise decision might

    1. ..insulate the individual from a hostile work environment.

    2. .is based upon reason and seeking and processing information, and on

    factual discussion.

    3. Persons interacting with a .are protective, dogmatic, evaluative and

    righteous.

    4. ..is the degree of attraction that the group has for each of its members.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    11/15

    be to stay on the edge of town which would be a poor decision in terms of attracting clerical

    employees.

    Grouping might be classified as a potential problem with group decision-making. So might

    individual dominance- the tendency for one person in a group to dominate over the other

    members.

    In the process, the potential benefits of input from the other members are negated. Dominance

    by one member tends to take place more frequently when peop le in the group are of

    unequal rank. The person of high organizational rank often dominates because lower ranking

    group members consider it politically unwise to criticize that person. If you are the head of a

    group, or a high-status participant, four things can be done to circumvent the problem of

    individual dominance.

    Refrain from announcing your preferred solution while the group is working through theproblem.

    Listen carefully to suggestions from every group member.

    Encourage every group member to participate.

    Demonstrate concern for achieving a high-quality solution.

    Self Assessment Questions IV

    14.6 Group Dynamics

    Group dynamics is concerned with the interactions and forces between group members in a

    social situation. When the concept is applied to the study of organizational behaviour, the

    focus is on the dynamics of members of formal or informal groups in the organization,

    1. Even if a group of people do not formally sit together to thrash out a decision,

    2. Group decision-making is helpful in gaining _____________ and ______________.

    3. ____________________take longer than individual decisions and sometimes lead to acompromise decision of little value.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    12/15

    i.e., it is concerned with gaining knowledge of groups, how they develop, and their effect on

    individual members and the organisations in which they function.

    Thomas Harrell has defined group dynamics as an expression that describes the situation in

    which people acting together in a group accomplish certain thing, either positively or

    negatively in a way that cannot be explained adequately in terms of the individual acting

    separately.

    Dorwin Cartwright has stressed the importance of group dynamics particularly in the context

    of bringing about a change. According to him, the problems of 20th century are essentially

    the problems of human relations.

    The word 'dynamics', is derived from a Greek word which means force. Group dynamics

    refers to the forces operating in groups. Investigation of group dynamics consists of a study

    of these forces such as what gives rise to them, what conditions modified them, whatconsequences they have, etc. The practical application of group dynamics consists of the

    utilization of knowledge about these forces for the achievement of some purpose. Group

    dynamics, is not particularly novel. It goes back at least to the outstanding work of men like

    Simmel, Freud, and Cooley.

    Although interest in groups has a long and respectable history, of late research centres in

    several countries are carrying out substantial programmes of research designed to reveal the

    nature of groups and their functioning. In this development, the name of Kurt Lewin is worth-

    mentioning. Lewin became convinced of society's urgent need for a scientific approach to the

    understanding of the dynamics of groups. In 1945, he established the Research Centre for

    Group Dynamics to meet this need. The Centre has been devoting its efforts to improving our

    scientific understanding of groups through laboratory experiments, field studies, and the use

    of techniques of action research.

    Various factors in the work environment affect group behaviour. The two broad aspects of

    the environment which affect group behaviour are: a) the physical environment, e.g., plant,

    equipment, layout, and b) the psycho-social environment, e.g., worker needs reward systems,

    work group structure, supervisory practices, work group norms, worker roles and attitudes.

    14.6.1 Principles of Group Dynamics

    A group can work effectively only if its members stick to certain desired norms, which

    Cartwright has termed principles of group dynamics. These principles are:

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    13/15

    i) If a group is to be used effectivel y as a mediu m of change, those who are to be

    changed and those who are to wield an influence for change must have a strong sense of

    belonging to the same group, i.e., the barriers between the leaders and the led should

    be broken down.

    ii) The more attractive a group is to its members, the greater the influence it would

    exercise on its members. If attitudes, values or behaviour, are relevant as a basis of

    attraction to the group, the group will wield a tremendous influence over them. If a

    man joins a union mainly to keep his job and to improve his working conditions, he may

    be largely influenced by the union's attempt to modify his attitudes towards national

    affairs.

    iii) The higher the prestige of a group member in the eyes of other members, the greater

    the influence he will exercise on them.

    iv) Successful efforts to change individuals or sub-parts of a group would result in making

    them conform to the norms of the group.

    v) Strong pressure for changes in a group can be established by creating a shared

    perception by members for the need for c hange, thus making the source of pressure for

    change lie within the group itself.

    vi) Information relating to the need for change, plans for change, and the consequence of

    change must be shared by all the members of a group.

    vii) Change s in one part of a group pro duce a strain in other related parts which can be

    reduced only by eliminating the change or by bringing about readjustments in the related

    parts.

    Cattell proposed seven theorems in his analysis of the dynamics of syntality1, which are

    largely specifications of the characteristics of synergy. Briefly stated, these theorems hold

    that:

    1. Groups are formed to satisfy individual needs and cease to exist when they no longer

    serve this purpose.

    2. The total synergy of a group is the vector resultant of the attitudes of all members towardsthe group. (Synergy thus depends upon the number of persons in the group, the strength

    and direction of the satisfactions each person obtains from the group, and the relation of

    such satisfactions to other groups.)

    1Definition: behavioral characteristics of a group perceived as parallel to or inferable from the personality

    structure of an individual.

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    14/15

    3. Effective synergy may be directed towards goals outside the group, hence groups may

    establish patterns of reaching which are subsidiary to some ultimate goal of the groups.

    4. Individual group members may also use groups to achieve personal goals that is group

    activities may be subsidiary to some ultimate personal goal.

    5. Patterns of behaviour in group, such as loyalty and subordination are learned in

    accordance with the law of effect.

    6. Group memberships may overlap, but the total synergy in such overlapping groups

    remains constant.

    7. There exists a close parallelism between the personality traits of the group members and

    syntality traits of the group.

    14.7. Summary

    A group refers to two or more persons who interact for a common explicit purpose.

    Kimball Young defines a group as "two or more persons in a state of social interaction."

    The essential characteristics of a small group are: 1) two or more people, 2) who interact

    with one another, 3) share some common ideology, and 4) see themselves as a group.

    Groups may be classified in many different ways: the basis for differentiation may be

    purpose or goal extent of structuring legal organisation or setting.

    The end goal of the manager's organizing responsibility is to create formal work groups

    that are necessary to achieve the organisations goals.

    Membership in the group is a selective process in which individuals are granted

    membership primarily on the basis of commonality of interests and willingness to be

    co-operative and to conform to the group norms.

    Cohesiveness is the degree of attraction that the group has for each of its members.

    Group dynamics is concerned with the interactions and forces between group members

    in a social situation.

    14.8 Terminal Questions

    1. What is a Group? What are its basic characteristics?

    2. Distinguish between formal and informal groups.

    3. Enumerate the advantages and disad vantages of an informal group.

    4. What are the major principles on which group dynamics function?

  • 7/28/2019 Human Resource Management Notes 14

    15/15

    14.9 Answers to SAQs and TQs

    Self Assessment Questions I

    1- Newcomb, 2- attracted to one another. 3- self-esteem

    Self Assessment Questions II

    1- Organisations goals, 2-Informal Groups, 3- sense of security and belonging

    Self Assessment Questions III

    1-Informal groups, 2-The adult ego state, 3-Parent ego, 4-Cohesiveness

    Self Assessment Questions IV

    1- Several people usually provide input to any major decision, 2- acceptance, commitment, 3-

    Group decisions

    Answers to TQs:

    1. Refer to 14.2

    2. Refer to 14.4

    3. Refer to 14.4.2

    4. Refer to 14.7