human vision model to predict observer performance: detection of microcalcifications as a function...

21
Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey Johnson, PhD Hans Roehrig, PhD Jeffrey Lubin, PhD Michael Engstrom, BS

Upload: paul-carpenter

Post on 03-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Human Vision Model to Predict Observer

Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a

Function of Monitor Phosphor

Elizabeth Krupinski, PhDJeffrey Johnson, PhDHans Roehrig, PhDJeffrey Lubin, PhD

Michael Engstrom, BS

Page 2: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Acknowledgments This work was supported by

a grant from the NIH R01 CA 87816-01. We would also like to thank Siemens for the loan of 1 of the monitors and MedOptics for 1 of the CCD cameras used in the study

Page 3: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Rationale• Digital mammography potential

– Improve breast cancer detection – CAD does not need digitization

• Display monitors should be optimized– Physical evaluation parameters– Psychophysical evaluation (JNDs)– Clinical evaluation radiologists

Page 4: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Rationale• Observer trials (ROC studies)– Require many images (power)– Require many observers (power)– Are time-consuming

• Predictive models may help– Simulate effects softcopy display

parameters on image quality– Predict effects on performance

Page 5: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

JNDmetrix Model• Computational method predicting

human performance in detection, discrimination & image-quality tasks

• Based on JND measurement principles & frequency-channel vision-modeling principles

• 2 input images & model returns accurate, robust estimates of visual discriminability

Page 6: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

JNDmetrix Model

sa mpling

proba bility

distance metric

optic s

Q norm

JN Dva lue

input images

frequency specificcontrastpyramid

oriented responses

transducerMasking - gain control

JNDMap

...

Page 7: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Display Monitors• 2 Siemens high-performance– 2048 x 2560 resolution– Dome MD-5 10-bit video

board– 71 Hz refresh rate– Monochrome– Calibrated to DICOM-14

standard• P45 vs P104 phosphor

Page 8: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Physical Evaluation• Luminance: 0.8 cd/m2 – 500

cd/m2)– Same on both

• NPS: P104 > P45• SNR: P45 > P104• Model input

– Each stimulus on CRT imaged with CCD camera

Page 9: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Phosphor Granularity

P45 Phosphor < P104 Phosphor

Page 10: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Monitor NPS

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00Spatia l Frequency (lp /m m )

10.00

100.00

1000.00

10000.00

NP

S

P104: R atio 4

P45: R atio 4

N yquist F requency o f the C R T under test (3 .5 lp /m m )

R aster F requency6.9 lp /m m

N PS of tw o S iem ens M onitors for AD U 127, one w ith a P104 phosphor, and one w ith a P45 phosphor.The data w ere norm a- lized to a C C D exposure of 10,000 AD U . Three C C D to C R T p ixel ratios w ere used: 53:1, 8:1 and 4:1.

P104:R atio 8

P45:R atio 8

P104:R atio 53

P45: R atio 53

Page 11: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Images• Mammograms USF Database • 512 x 512 sub-images extracted• 13 malignant & 12 benign Ca++

• Removed using median filter • Add Ca++ to 25 normals• 75%, 50% & 25% contrasts by

weighted superposition of signal-absent & present versions

• 250 total images • Decimated to 256 x 256

Page 12: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Edited Images

Original 75% Ca++ 50% Ca++

25% Ca++ 0% Ca++

Page 13: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Image Editing Quality

• 512 x 512 & 256 x 256 versions• 200 pairs of images– Original contrast only– Paired with edited version – Paired randomly with others

• 3 radiologists • 2AFC – chose which is edited

Page 14: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Editing Quality Results

Reader 512 x 512 256 x 256

1 47.5% 46%

2 57% 47.5%

3 39% 49.5%

Average 47.83% sd = 7.35

47.67% sd = 1.08

Page 15: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Observer Study• 250 images

– 256 x 256 @ 5 contrasts• 6 radiologists • No image processing • Ambient lights off• No time limits• 2 reading sessions ~ 1 month

apart• Counter-balanced presentation

Page 16: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Observer Study• Images presented individually• Is Ca++ present or absent•Rate confidence 6-point scale•Multi-Reader Multi-Case Receiver

Operating Characteristic*

* Dorfman, Berbaum & Metz 1992

Page 17: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Human Results

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

Mean A

z

25%

50%

75%

100%

Overa

ll

P104P45

* * *

* P < 0.05

Page 18: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Model Results

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

JND

25% 50% 75% 100%

P104P45

* P < 0.05

**

**

Page 19: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Correlation

R2 = 0.973

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

5 7 9 11 13 15

Model JND

Ra

dio

log

ists

' M

ea

n A

z

Page 20: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Summary• P104

– > light emission efficiency – > spatial noise due to

granularity• P45

– > SNR• Luminance – noise tradeoff• P45 > P104 detection performance• JNDmetrix model predicted well

Page 21: Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey

Model Additions•Eye-position will be recorded

as observers search images to determine if any attention parameters can be added to JNDmetrix model to improve accuracy of predictions