hume 2

10
HUME 2 SKEPTICISM ABOUT CAUSAL KNOWLEDGE

Upload: terentia-avis

Post on 31-Dec-2015

20 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

HUME 2. SKEPTICISM ABOUT CAUSAL KNOWLEDGE. David Hume 1711 - 1776. This book cannot cause me to see words, but its constant conjunction with seen words causes (?) me to hang on to it. 2 Theses about Causal Knowledge. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HUME 2

HUME 2

SKEPTICISM ABOUT CAUSAL KNOWLEDGE

Page 2: HUME 2

David Hume 1711 - 1776

This book cannot

cause me to see

words, but its

constant conjunction

with seen words

causes (?)

me to hang on to it.

Page 3: HUME 2

2 Theses about Causal Knowledge

THESIS 1: Knowledge of cause and effect is “based on experience.”

THESIS 2: Our causal conclusions “are not founded on reasoning or any process of understanding” based on our experience. (225)

Page 4: HUME 2

The Inference to Causal Connection

THE INFERENCE in causal reasoning:

“…we always presume when we see like sensible qualities that they have like secret powers” (225)

For example:

Aspirin relieved my headaches in the past.

So: Aspirin has the power to relieve my headaches.

Page 5: HUME 2

THE MISSING “MEDIUM”

These inferences are invalid as they stand: a premise (medium) is missing.

1. Aspirin relieved my headaches in the past.2. Missing “Medium” [= middle premise].So: Aspirin causes headache relief.

[=Aspirin always relieves headaches.]Question: What is the missing premise

(medium)? (225-6)

Page 6: HUME 2

THE MISSING “MEDIUM”

Answer: “…the future will be conformable to the past.” (226)

[= “nature is uniform”]

1. Aspirin relieved my headaches in the past.

2. Nature is uniform.So: Aspirin causes headache relief.

[= Aspirin always relieves headaches.]

Page 7: HUME 2

The Uniformity of Nature

1) Is not known a priori.

Whatever is known a priori cannot be false without contradiction, but there is “…no contradiction that the course of nature may change.” (226)

Page 8: HUME 2

The Uniformity of Nature

2) Is not known a posteriori.

that nature has been uniform in the past does not entail that it will be uniform in the future, unless we assume that nature is uniform—and thus argue in a circle. (226R)

Page 9: HUME 2

AUXILIARY ARGUMENTS

1) Science requires repetition, but logic never does. (226R)

2) Non-logical children and animals have causal knowledge. (227)

Page 10: HUME 2

Hume’s theory of causal knowledge

1)“CUSTOM OR HABIT” is the basis of causal knowledge (229)

2) NATURE gives us “principles of…association of ideas” (231-2):

i) resemblance

ii) contiguity in time or place

iii) causation