humidifying a sealant cure oven product design specifications- winter 2012
DESCRIPTION
Humidifying a Sealant Cure Oven Product Design Specifications- Winter 2012. Team Members: Thong Truong Paul Lucas Khoi Nguyen Asgedom Grehiwot Mircea Bec Meshari Ebrahim Faculty Advisor: Dr. Faryar Etesami Industrial Adviosr : Rory Olson. Preview . Background Information - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
HUMIDIFYING A SEALANT CURE OVEN
PRODUCT DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS- WINTER 2012
Team Members:Thong Truong
Paul LucasKhoi Nguyen
Asgedom GrehiwotMircea Bec
Meshari EbrahimFaculty Advisor:
Dr. Faryar EtesamiIndustrial Adviosr:
Rory Olson
Preview • Background Information• Mission Statement• Project Plan• Customer Identification• Product Design Specification• House of Quality• Technical Risk Management• Q&A
Background Information Most of Boeing design aircrafts are affected by
corrosion. How do they prevent corrosion? Process of preventing corrosion- sealing and
curing. The two current approaches of sealant are
known as “traditional” and “lean” methods. Advantages and disadvantages of each method.
Traditional Method
•Advantages:― Hold many parts.― Has humidity control.
•Disadvantages: ― Large Size, costly to move.― Hardwired/Plumbed.― Inefficient flow control
Lean Method
• Advantages:― Proper size and flow.― Not hardwired.― Apply 120v AC
•Disadvantages: ― No humidity control.― Plumbed.
MISSION STATEMENT• Design a device which can embrace the
advantages of the two current methods together to produce a highly efficient curing oven.
• Equip the current oven with a non-corrosive, humidity control and maintain a lightweight design.
• Design oven will have on board water supply.
Project PlanProject Milestones
Task Start Date Finish Date Due DateInitial Brainstorming Jan 9 Jan 28 -PDS Report Jan 9 Jan 28 Jan 30External Search Jan 20 Feb 1 Feb 27PDS Report Presentation Jan 30 Feb 13 Feb 13Initial Design Feb 3 Feb 20 -Design Feb 20 March 10 -Design Evaluation March 10 March 12 -Progress Report Jan 30 March 10 March 12Progress Report Presentation Feb 20 Feb 25 Feb 27
Prototype & Test April 2 May 2 -Redesign May 2 May 10 -Repeat Prototype & Test May 10 May 17 -Manufacture May 17 Jun 1 -Assemble/Install/Test Jun 1 Jun 10 -
Customer Identification
Internal:• PSU Capstone Program.
• Dr. Etesami, Capstone Instructor.
• Capstone Team Members.
External:• Boeing Company.
• Rory Olson, Boeing Research and Development
Engineer
Product Design Specification (PDS)
• Performance:
• Quality and Reliability:
Priority
Maintain 135 ± 5 oF
• Humidity of 50% ± 5% RH
• 1 out of 1000 part failure.
High
High
Product Design Specification (PDS)
•Life in Service:• At least 5 years with little maintenance.
•Materials:• No silicone products can be used in the fabrication
or assembly of the oven.• Use corrosion resistant materials.
•Dimensions:• for this project we would be using
3’ wide x 3’ tall x 4’ deep oven.
•Ergonomics:• Weight light of water tank(<35 lbs. and 4’ height)
Priority
High
Medium
Medium
Low
House of Quality
Parameter
Importance
Customer
Engineering Criteria Competition
Temperatu
re(oF)
Humidity(% RH)
Cost($)
PowerSource(Volts
AC)
Weight
(lbs)
FlowContr
ol
WaterSupply
Current Designs
Performance 10
Boeing
***** ***** - - - *** - **
Mobility 6 - - **** ** ** ***** *Testing 9 ***** ***** - - - ** - -
Maintenance 7 - - **** - - - - -Ergonomics 2 - - - - *** - **** **
InstallationProject Team - - ** **** * - ***** -
Current Design
_ 135 N/A N/A 120 200 No N/A -
Target _ 135 50% 2000 120 300 Yes Portable -
Technical Risk Management
Scope Definition:• A “scope control process” will be maintained
throughout the lifetime of the project.Performance:
• Performance of each team member will influence directly to the success of the product.
Reliability:• The product must be reliable since it utilizes on a daily
basics. Identify the design’s weaknesses and eliminate or minimize their effects.
Summary
• Background Information• Mission Statement• Project Plan• Customer Identification• Product Design Specification• House of Quality• Technical Risk Management
QUESTIONS