hungarian education system
TRANSCRIPT
95% of (2800) schools is supported by the local autonomy/majority;
Nr. of teachers= 160.000; students= 1.000.000;
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 2
Clarification of denomination ina) education science
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 3
Clarification of denomination ina) education science
Pedagogy/
Educational science
Didactic
(Science of the teaching)Education
(Science of
behavior development )
Cybernetic
Psychology
History
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 4
theory practicetheory practice
Sociology
Phylosophy
Psychology
Lingvistic
Clarification of denomination in
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 5
inb) mainstream schools’
typology
SECONDARY Ed.
14- 18/ 12- 18/ 10-18 y
HIGHER Ed.
18- 22/18-23/ 18- 24y
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 6
PRIMARY Ed.
6- 14 y
14- 18/ 12- 18/ 10-18 y
Elementary schools
Lower secondary schools
Historical overview
Before political (economic and social) system changing in 1989 -central directory without independence
• education compulsory from the age of 6 to 16y; • central curricula since 1972 & 1978; • one type book for each subject
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 7
• one type book for each subject• obligation in teching methodology; •…..in the coice of teaching tools; •…..in subjects’ types & names ; •…..in timing ; •…..in teaching materials – teching topics; • uniform -usage in the schools for teachers and students as well• efficiancy checking in education by a regional team which had
one member in every subject (school- inspector)
Legislation in education
In the 1990s 2000s the education system in Hungary was restructured – Longer or shorter schooling (Compulsory until 18y/20y)– Number of special (separated) schools was decreased– A new National (Basic) Curriculum was introduced with ten
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 10
– A new National (Basic) Curriculum was introduced with ten scientifical fields in 1998
– New school-books were appeared (!! new system for evaluating school- books)
– Teachers’ professional independence has been allowed– Schools’ economical and professional independence has been
allowed– Smaller schools were closed or integrated (2005)& 20.000
teacher put unemployment– Techer- education system was reformed by the declaration of
Bologna
Scientific qualification
1. Dr of university Ph. D.
DR of LAWDR of MEDICIN…Dr of..bla bla
Before 1993 After 1993
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 12
2. Candidatury3. Dr of Science
Ph. D.
Dr of Science
Habilitated into Science
Habilitated into Science
Chronology of
spec. Ed.
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 14
1. Medical model of special education since 1890 until 1993
2. Pedagogical model was introduced in 1993
Mile stones in the legislation
• 1985- schools’ name was changed• 1993- integration has been introduced and
allowed for every school regarding to the OECD provideness
• 1996- nr. of grades in a special class were
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 15
• 1996- nr. of grades in a special class were reduced in the last two grades (7th & 8th)
• 2003- inclusive education has been taken to obligation (except heavydisabled children)
• 2005- new National (basic) Curricula for SEN- IEP (Individual Education Plan)
• 2006- nr. of special schools was reduced and their profile was reformed (EGYMI = local methodical centres of inclusive education)
Temporarly
HeavyMild
� Broken arm/leg etc.
� flu
� Family problems
� Death in the tight family
� Staying in a hospital in order to being operated
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 16Permanently
� Mild learning difficulties (dyslexia; dysgraphia…)
� Mild sensory organs’ difficulties (hearing disorders; seeing disorders)
� Heavy learning disability
� Heavy mentally disability
(down syndrome)
� Deafness (hearing impairment)
� Blindness (seeing impairment)
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS
• Somato-• Senso-• Learning-• Speaking-• Mentally-• Disorders in the personality- development or psycho-
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 17
• Disorders in the personality- development or psycho-development which can be traceable for organic causes!!!!
• Autism• Cumulated disorders
Kognitive disfunctions
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 18
mentally disabilities
IQ 50-25
learning disabilities
IQ 50-70
Learning traubles (15% of the children population)
Learning difficulties & disorders (10-12 %) Learning disabilities (2- 2,5%)
temporarly permanently permanently & general
Learning difficulty Learning disorder Learning handicap
Slow learners; Dyslexia Perception problems
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 19
Slow learners;
Low efficiency in learning;
Incorrect learning methodology;
Incorrect learning practices/habits
Dyslexia
Dysgraphia
Dyscalculia
Hyperactivity
Social skills problem
Perception problems
Motoric problems
Communication problem
Cognitive function problem
Mainstream teachers’ competences Special teachers’ competences
School system for children with special needs
Lower/upper secondary schools
Special secondary technical schools
10- 14 y
14- 18 y
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 20
Elementary schools
Kindergarten 3- 6 y
6- 10 y
Disabled childrens’ way in the school system
• Pre- or elementary chool teachers’ competences• Advisory team in every town & city• Special board in each region & Budapest• Local majority’s responsibility
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 21
• Local majority’s responsibility• Head masters’ competences• Parents’ competences
Process of the special schooling
1. Pre- or elementary school teachers’ notices2. Diagnosys from an Advisory board (SENb)3. Diagnosys from a Special board (SENa)4. Parents’ agreement
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 22
4. Parents’ agreement5. School choosing6. Placement
Dilemmas in the special schooling
• Quality of the professional conditions (nr. of special teachers)
• Mainstream teachers’ positive attitudes towards SEN
2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISA 23
towards SEN• Economical difficulties of the schools
(SENa; SENb)• Parents disagreement
„Single teacher” model„Single teacher” model„Single teacher” model„Single teacher” model„Single teacher” model„Single teacher” model„Single teacher” model„Single teacher” model
• There is no special teacher in a lesson in a class room
• IEP is made by a special teacher based on the diagnosys
2009.11.27.2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISAAgnes N. Toth UNISA 2424
• IEP is made by a special teacher based on the diagnosys of a special team
• IEP is realised in separated time- frame and class room
• The special teacher is a full- rights participant of the teaching team activity (process planning or efficiency evaluation)
„Team„Team-- teaching” modelteaching” model
�� There is a special teacher on a lesson in a class roomThere is a special teacher on a lesson in a class room
�� IEP is made by a special teacher based on the IEP is made by a special teacher based on the diagnosys of a special boarddiagnosys of a special board
IEP is realised during the lessons in the same class IEP is realised during the lessons in the same class
2009.11.27.2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISAAgnes N. Toth UNISA 2929
�� IEP is realised during the lessons in the same class IEP is realised during the lessons in the same class room with mainstream childrenroom with mainstream children
�� The special teacher is a fullThe special teacher is a full-- rights participant of the rights participant of the teaching team activity (process planning or efficiency teaching team activity (process planning or efficiency evaluation)evaluation)
Down Down inclusioninclusionDown Down inclusioninclusion
2009.11.27.2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISAAgnes N. Toth UNISA 3434
How do NOT to doHow do NOT to do……
2009.11.27.2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISAAgnes N. Toth UNISA 3535
HowHow dodo NOT NOT toto dodo…(2)…(2)
MathsMaths lessonlessoninin an ‘an ‘inclusiveinclusive’ ’ classclass-- has has beenbeenrecordedrecorded ininMathsMaths lessonlessoninin an ‘an ‘inclusiveinclusive’ ’ classclass-- has has beenbeenrecordedrecorded inin2007 2007 inin HungaryHungary
2009.11.27.2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISAAgnes N. Toth UNISA 3636
StrategiesStrategies howhow toto dodo……1. One teach one support – shared activities by goals:
teaching and support (teaching materials are thesame)
2. Team teaching- shared activities by differentteachers: one step for first, second for second(teaching material is the same)
3. Station teaching- shared activities by different
2009.11.27.2009.11.27. Agnes N. Toth UNISAAgnes N. Toth UNISA 3838
3. Station teaching- shared activities by differentgroups of students (teaching material is the same)
4. Alternative teaching- shared activities by differentsubjects ((teaching materials are NOT the same: forexample mathemetics or grammar)
5. Parallel teaching- sharing activities by differentmethods in the same material