hybrid riser tower – tailored for - subsea uk riser tower – tailored for local shallow water...
TRANSCRIPT
Hybrid Riser Tower – Tailored for Local Shallow Water Needs
Frank Lim
Subsea Malaysia at Oil and Gas Asia 2017, Kuala Lumpur
3 of 28
Overview
Historical Bundle Hybrid Riser TowersShallow Water Case Study
Background information Riser solutions consideredHybrid riser tower design implementation
EngineeringFabricationInstallation
4 of 28
Shallow Water Riser Systems
Dry trees with well access at the surfaceRiser types
Conductors
Host facilitiesCompliant towersFixed platforms
Wet treesRiser types
Flexible risers
Typical host facilitiesSemi-submersiblesFPSOs
Flexible Risers
Conductors
5 of 28
Deepwater Riser SystemsDry trees
Riser typesTop Tensioned Risers (TTRs)
Host facilitiesTLPs/Spars
Wet treesRiser types
Flexible risersSteel Catenary Risers (SCRs)Bundle Hybrid Riser TowersSingle Line Offset Risers (SLORs)
Typical host facilitiesSemi-submersiblesFPSOs/FPUs
SCRTTR
Bundle Hybrid Riser
SLOR
6 of 28
Cameron Hybrid Riser Tower
Bundled riser pipesMechanically jointed and installed from drill rig on production platformWeight in water neutralised by buoyancy modules Tensioned wires from platform make riser follow platform
7 of 28
Cameron Hybrid Riser Tower
Placid - Green Canyon (1988)Ensearch - Garden Bank (re-deployed 1994)
450-650m water depth
Both fields ended up producing sand. The riser was decommissioned and has not been used again
8 of 28
2H Hybrid Riser Tower
Adapted the Cameron design from under to offset from the platformChanged from mechanically jointed to all weldedBeached fabricated, towed to site and upendedFirst application on Total Girassol in Angola, 1350m depth
10 of 28
Background Information55 Nautical miles North of Matak island, Natuna Sea, Indonesia90m water depthEstimated production rate 2000 – 3000 bopd and associated gasField life of 5-7 years
11 of 28
Field Development PlanFixed platform with dry trees not considered due to:
Remote location and lack of export infrastructureRelatively high CAPEX for the desired production volumeShort field life to justify the CAPEX
Three step-out pre-drilled subsea wells installed using a Jack up rigTanker converted to an FPSO with mooring winches installed
Conventional Riser SolutionConsidered
Flexible risers considered as base caseChallenges for new build risers are
High cost: New flexible risersLong lead time: Supply schedule could not be accommodated at time of project sanctionInterfaces: High hang off loads requiring deck structure strengthening resulting in increased FPSO modification costs
Alternatively, an existing flexible riser from a stockistwas evaluated and the issues encountered were:
Availability of the desired diameter and lengthAdaptability in terms of pressure and temperature requirementsEnd fitting re-termination requirements and the associated cost and schedule
Alternative Riser Solutions Considered
Bottom weighted riser: Technical feasibility proven, lack of track recordFree-hanging coiled tubing based riser: Requires fatigue testing to establish fatigue performance curves
Selected Solution –Bundled Hybrid Riser Tower
SeabedWell
External RiserBundle
Riser Gravity Base
FPSO
BuoyancyTank
WD
: 90
m Spread / Turret
Mooring
Dynamic Jumpers
Static Jumpers
Riser bundle with a buoyancy tank to support and anchored to the seabed with a gravity base Dynamic bonded hose jumpers from riser top to FPSOStatic bonded hose jumpers from riser base to wells
Selected Solution (contd.) –Bundled Hybrid Riser Tower
Maximise use of stocked steel pipes and locally available materials Onshore steel fabrication
Lowest cost Shortest lead time
Parallel engineering, procurement and fabrication activitiesPrioritise engineering and procurement of key components that require longer fabrication duration such as riser end terminations, spools, etc.
Bonded flexible hoses connecting riser top to FPSO are available for a fraction of the price of equivalent unbonded flexible pipe jumpers and at much shorter delivery scheduleProvides flexibility with installation vessel options instead of having to identify the installation vessel at the onset of the projectAllows future riser relocationHas proven track record of being installed in deeper water depths
17 of 28
Riser Top AssemblyFunction: riser pipe spools to jumper departure to FPSO Size: 4m x 3.5m x 2mWeight: 8.6 TeChain Connection to BT
18 of 28
Riser Bottom Assembly
Function: riser pipe spools to jumper departure seabed wellheadsSize: 3m x 3m x 2.2mWeight: 4 TeChain Connection to Foundation
19 of 28
Buoyancy TankFunction: provide upthrust for the riser bundleSize: 4m dia x 6m length; 20m below MSL50 Te net upthrust21mT dry weight
21 of 28
Riser Foundation and Dead Mass Anchor
Function: Anchor the riser to seabedDMA attached to the riser bundle during installationRiser foundation structure installed prior to the riser bundle
Dynamic Jumpers
Function: Conduit for production and gas injection lines from bundle riser to FPSOSize: 4in ID bonded hoses12 x dynamic jumpers for riser12 x static jumpers to wellhead
26 of 28
Overall Project Schedule
Detail Design and Engineering; 5 months (Jan – May 2012)
Procurement; 5 Months (Mar – Aug 2012)
Dynamic flexible jumpersStatic flexible jumpersDynamic Umbilical and buoyancy modules
Fabrication; 5 Months (Mar – Aug 2012)Riser bundle Riser end assembliesRiser foundationRiser installation aid (cradle for upending)
Installation; 10 days (Apr 2013) post monsoon and installation vessel availability
27 of 28
ChallengesPreliminary and detail design combined into fast track scheduleEngineering of riser bundle to suit the existing pipe stock Structural and pipe material verification to ensure they are fit-for-purposeFast track flexible hose and umbilical engineering design to enable procurement and delivery on timeFabrication management to ensure adherence to fabrication specificationsFAT/SIT and additional testing requirements for riser components such as tether assembly, flexible hoses and umbilicalDepending on installation vessel availability, installation strategy and associated installation aids were developed