hydro-economic decision support to enhance catchment management

24
Hydro-Economic decision support to enhance catchment management BENNIE GROVÉ DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS

Upload: angus

Post on 14-Feb-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Hydro-Economic decision support to enhance catchment management. Bennie Grové Department of Agricultural Economics. Introduction. South Africa is a water scarce country National Water Act (1998) Ecological Water Requirements (EWR) National Water Resources Strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

Hydro-Economic decision support to enhance catchment management

BENNIE GROVÉDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL

ECONOMICS

Page 2: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

INTRODUCTION

• South Africa is a water scarce country • National Water Act (1998)

– Ecological Water Requirements (EWR)• National Water Resources Strategy

– a number of the South African catchments to be in situation of being over-allocated

• Before issuing water licenses to address imbalances, water managers have to reconsider – catchment scale operating rules,– water conservation and demand management options,– water augmentations alternatives and – the level and necessity of water curtailments

to determine the most viable option.

Page 3: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

OBJECTIVES

• The main objective of this research is to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) to help water managers test various catchment scale water management scenarios impact on irrigation farming profitability and livelihoods.

• Achieving the object requires an integrated hydro-economic modelling framework.

Page 4: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

RESEARCH AREA

• Crocodile East catchment South Africa– Highly over-allocated– Instream flow requirement

• Ecology• International flows to Mozambique

• Water needs to be re-allocated

Page 5: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

OVER ALLOCATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

CrocodileCatchment is in

The Nkomati WMA

Page 6: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

ECOLOGICAL SENSITIVE AREA: KRUGER NATIONAL PARK

Page 7: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

INTEGRATED SET OF MODELS

• MIKE-BASIN– reconcile irrigation water demand with catchment water availability

• for given catchment operating rules– Daily input requirements

• Catchment hydrology• Water demand

• Optimisation model– Maximises total farm gross margins– Water availability

• Operating rules– Dated production functions (water use optimisation)

• Weekly• State contingent• Irrigation technology specific (Distribution unifromity) • Multiple fields

– Results are used to evaluate • Profitability (REO)• Livelihood (ability to generate cashflows)

• MIKE BASIN Irrigation– Information to generate irrigation technology specific dated production functions (daily)

Page 8: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

MODELLING DIFFICULTY

MIKE BASIN

OPTIMISATION

Page 9: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

MIKE BASIN Irrigation Model

Daily Irrigation Outputs

(ET, ES, EOP, DP, RO, AI)

Weekly Irrigation inputs to SKELETON

(ET, ES, EOP, DP, RO, AI)

Optimsation Model

Optimised Weekly Farm Demand Profile

Disaggregate to Daily Farm Demand Profile

MIKE BASIN without the irrigation model, Demand node representing farm

Catchment water availability and water available to the farm from all sources

Weekly water available limit

Page 10: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

RESULTS

• Profitability– ROE > ROA

• Financial sustainability• Indicates profitable employment of foreign capital• Do not need to use own capital to meet interest

payments• Reported as probability to achieve financial

sustainability• Livelihood objective

– Determine whether enough cash is generated to cover living expenses

Page 11: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

-0.3 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.150

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

S150 BE

Return on Equity (Fraction)

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

Page 12: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

-0.3 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.150

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

S150 BE

Return on Equity (Fractioin)

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

29% : ROE < 0%

65% : ROE >= 7.66%

6% : 0 <= ROE < 7.66%

Page 13: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

-0.3 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.150

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

S150 BE

Return on Equity (Fractioin)

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

29% : ROE < 0%

65% : ROE >= 7.66%

6% : 0 <= ROE < 7.66%

Page 14: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS

Page 15: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

KD_NO_09_S100

KD_NO_09_SD100

KD_NO_09_S150

KD_NO_09_SD150 _

KD_NO_12_S100

KD_NO_12_SD100

KD_NO_12_S150

KD_NO_12_SD150 _

KD_Pres_12_S100

KD_Pres_12_SD100

KD_Pres_12_S150

KD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_Pres_12_S100

MD_Pres_12_SD100

MD_Pres_12_S150

MD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_CC_12_S100

MD_CC_12_SD100

MD_CC_12_S150

MD_CC_12_SD150 _

MVD_Pres_12_S100

MVD_Pres_12_SD100

MVD_Pres_12_S150

MVD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MVD_CC_12_S100

MVD_CC_12_SD100

MVD_CC_12_S150

MVD_CC_12_SD150

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RoE: Below Zero RoE: Above Zero and Below RoA RoE: Above RoA

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

0.9 vs 1.2

Page 16: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

KD_NO_09_S100

KD_NO_09_SD100

KD_NO_09_S150

KD_NO_09_SD150 _

KD_NO_12_S100

KD_NO_12_SD100

KD_NO_12_S150

KD_NO_12_SD150 _

KD_Pres_12_S100

KD_Pres_12_SD100

KD_Pres_12_S150

KD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_Pres_12_S100

MD_Pres_12_SD100

MD_Pres_12_S150

MD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_CC_12_S100

MD_CC_12_SD100

MD_CC_12_S150

MD_CC_12_SD150 _

MVD_Pres_12_S100

MVD_Pres_12_SD100

MVD_Pres_12_S150

MVD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MVD_CC_12_S100

MVD_CC_12_SD100

MVD_CC_12_S150

MVD_CC_12_SD150

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RoE: Below Zero RoE: Above Zero and Below RoA RoE: Above RoA

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

No vs Present

Page 17: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

KD_NO_09_S100

KD_NO_09_SD100

KD_NO_09_S150

KD_NO_09_SD150 _

KD_NO_12_S100

KD_NO_12_SD100

KD_NO_12_S150

KD_NO_12_SD150 _

KD_Pres_12_S100

KD_Pres_12_SD100

KD_Pres_12_S150

KD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_Pres_12_S100

MD_Pres_12_SD100

MD_Pres_12_S150

MD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_CC_12_S100

MD_CC_12_SD100

MD_CC_12_S150

MD_CC_12_SD150 _

MVD_Pres_12_S100

MVD_Pres_12_SD100

MVD_Pres_12_S150

MVD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MVD_CC_12_S100

MVD_CC_12_SD100

MVD_CC_12_S150

MVD_CC_12_SD150

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RoE: Below Zero RoE: Above Zero and Below RoA RoE: Above RoA

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

Class C - all farms infeasible

Page 18: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

KD_NO_09_S100

KD_NO_09_SD100

KD_NO_09_S150

KD_NO_09_SD150 _

KD_NO_12_S100

KD_NO_12_SD100

KD_NO_12_S150

KD_NO_12_SD150 _

KD_Pres_12_S100

KD_Pres_12_SD100

KD_Pres_12_S150

KD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_Pres_12_S100

MD_Pres_12_SD100

MD_Pres_12_S150

MD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_CC_12_S100

MD_CC_12_SD100

MD_CC_12_S150

MD_CC_12_SD150 _

MVD_Pres_12_S100

MVD_Pres_12_SD100

MVD_Pres_12_S150

MVD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MVD_CC_12_S100

MVD_CC_12_SD100

MVD_CC_12_S150

MVD_CC_12_SD150

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RoE: Below Zero RoE: Above Zero and Below RoA RoE: Above RoA

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

Montrose

Page 19: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

KD_NO_09_S100

KD_NO_09_SD100

KD_NO_09_S150

KD_NO_09_SD150 _

KD_NO_12_S100

KD_NO_12_SD100

KD_NO_12_S150

KD_NO_12_SD150 _

KD_Pres_12_S100

KD_Pres_12_SD100

KD_Pres_12_S150

KD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_Pres_12_S100

MD_Pres_12_SD100

MD_Pres_12_S150

MD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_CC_12_S100

MD_CC_12_SD100

MD_CC_12_S150

MD_CC_12_SD150 _

MVD_Pres_12_S100

MVD_Pres_12_SD100

MVD_Pres_12_S150

MVD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MVD_CC_12_S100

MVD_CC_12_SD100

MVD_CC_12_S150

MVD_CC_12_SD150

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RoE: Below Zero RoE: Above Zero and Below RoA RoE: Above RoA

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

Present vs Class C

Page 20: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

KD_NO_09_S100

KD_NO_09_SD100

KD_NO_09_S150

KD_NO_09_SD150 _

KD_NO_12_S100

KD_NO_12_SD100

KD_NO_12_S150

KD_NO_12_SD150 _

KD_Pres_12_S100

KD_Pres_12_SD100

KD_Pres_12_S150

KD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_Pres_12_S100

MD_Pres_12_SD100

MD_Pres_12_S150

MD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MD_CC_12_S100

MD_CC_12_SD100

MD_CC_12_S150

MD_CC_12_SD150 _

MVD_Pres_12_S100

MVD_Pres_12_SD100

MVD_Pres_12_S150

MVD_Pres_12_SD150 _

MVD_CC_12_S100

MVD_CC_12_SD100

MVD_CC_12_S150

MVD_CC_12_SD150

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RoE: Below Zero RoE: Above Zero and Below RoA RoE: Above RoA

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

Present vs Class C

Page 21: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

LIVELIHOOD ANALYSIS

Page 22: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

KD_NO_09_S100

KD_NO_09_SD100

KD_NO_09_S150

KD_NO_09_SD150 0

KD_NO_12_S100

KD_NO_12_SD100

KD_NO_12_S150

KD_NO_12_SD150 0

KD_Pres_12_S100

KD_Pres_12_SD100

KD_Pres_12_S150

KD_Pres_12_SD150 0

MD_Pres_12_S100

MD_Pres_12_SD100

MD_Pres_12_S150

MD_Pres_12_SD150 0

MD_CC_12_S100

MD_CC_12_SD100

MD_CC_12_S150

MD_CC_12_SD150 0

MVD_Pres_12_S100

MVD_Pres_12_SD100

MVD_Pres_12_S150

MVD_Pres_12_SD150 0

MVD_CC_12_S100

MVD_CC_12_SD100

MVD_CC_12_S150

MVD_CC_12_SD150

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

NCF: Below Zero NCF: Above Zero

Cum

ulati

ve P

roba

bilit

y

Page 23: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

CONCLUSIONS

• MVD greatest potential– Cost of dam not included

• Class C is a no go scenario• Investigate enforcing EWR based on present flow

regime• Stimulate dialogue

Page 24: Hydro-Economic decision support  to enhance catchment management

THANK YOU

BENNIE GROVÉDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL

ECONOMICS