hydrogen storage (i) - mragheb.com 498es energy storage systems...npre 498 energy storage basic h...
TRANSCRIPT
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Hydrogen Storage (I)
The key to an efficient energy storage
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Why Hydrogen?
• High gravimetric energy density• Clean• Abundant, the most numerous element in
the universe! • Therefore affordable, once made
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Why Hydrogen Storage?
• Mediocre volumetric energy density • Do we have a hydrogen mine? • Gaseous under most circumstances
What are the problems?
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Typical H Storage Means
• High pressure• Cryogenic • Chemical Hydrides • Metal Hydrides • Physical Sorption
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Basic H Storage Requirements
• H mass percentage (~ 6%-wt at least)• Volumetric density (~0.15 kg/liter at least) • Low cost • Ease of recharge or regeneration • Fast release, fast recharge• Environmentally sound
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
• 3000, 5000, 7000 psi, maybe up to 10000• Gravimetric density up to 3%-wt H• Volumetric density ~ 0.06 kg/liter• Cost high for bottles > 7000 psi• Environmentally sound• But how about safety? it’s like a bomb!• Relative ease of refueling though taking time• Composite construction with metal liner
High Pressure H Storage
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
64.9 kg composite usage in the 1st hybrid vessel vs. 76.0 kg in the baseline tank(FW alone)
• The end-user H2 storage system weight efficiency = 1.67 kWh/kg vs. 1.50 kWh/kg inthe system with the baseline tank
• The end-user H2 storage system cost efficiency:•$11/lb CF
• $6/lb CF
Baseline $23.45 Fully Integrated $21.91
Baseline $18.74 Fully Integrated $17.79
Fully Separate $21.75
Fully Separate $17.63
14
ConstructionHigh Pressure H Storage
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Approach: Advanced Fiber Placement- Boeing• Advanced Fiber Placement: A CNC process that adds multiple strips
of composite material on demand.– Maximum weight efficiency - places material where needed
– Fiber steering allows greater design flexibility
– Process is scalable to hydrogen storage tanks
– Optimize plies on the dome sections with minimal limitation on fiber angle
– Reinforce dome without adding weight to cylinder
Tape PlacementRoller
Tape PlacementRoller
6
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Strength• Tank preparation and validation test
Representative smallest polaropening that the AFP process
can currently makeThe localized reinforcement protected
the dome regions very well
• Static Burst Result: 23420 PSI > 22804 PSI, EN standard(New European Standard superseding EIHP)
• 64.9 kg composite usage in the 1st hybrid vessel vs. 76 kgin the baseline tank (FW alone)
11.1 kg (14.6%) Savings!10
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Cryogenic H Storage• -252.87°C !• Very energy consuming to cool• Energy consuming to maintain• Gravimetric density up to 8~9% • Volumetric density ~ 0.08 kg/liter• Cost high• Environmentally sound and safe• Relative ease of refueling• Vacuum Dewar
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Relevance: High density cryogenic hydrogen enablescompact, lightweight, and cost effective storage
Cost effective: Cryogenicvessels use 2-4x less carbonfiber, reducing costs sharply athigher capacity
Compact: 235 L system holds151 L fuel (10.3-10.7 kg H2)
Source: TIAX
Hydrogen annual merit review, LLNL, June 8, 2010, p. 3 Cryogenic H2 fill line
Gaseous H2extraction line
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Relevance: Cryogenic pressure vesselscan exceed 2015 H2 storage targets and approach ultimate
ultimate
Gen 3, 10.4 kgH2
Gen 2, 10.4 kgH2
Hydrogen annual merit review, LLNL, June 8, 2010, p. 4
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Approach: reduce/eliminate H2 venting losses by researchingvacuum stability, insulation, and para-ortho conversion
Determine para-ortho effect onpressurization and venting losses
Directly measure para-orthopopulations
Determine vessel heat transfermechanism (radiation vs. conduction)
Evaluate vacuum stability bymeasuring pressure vesseloutgassing
Test ultra thin insulation for improvedvessel volume performance
Improve vessel design based onexperimental results
Hydrogen annual merit review, LLNL, June 8, 2010, p. 5
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Hydrogen has two nuclear spin states:para-H2 (stable at 20 K) and ortho-H2
para-H2 stable at 20 K
para-H2 converts toortho-H2 when heated
Normal H2(25% para, 75% ortho)
is stable at 300 K
ortho-H2
para-H2
Hydrogen annual merit review, LLNL, June 8, 2010, p. 6
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Para-ortho conversion absorbs energy & increases dormancy(equivalent to a second evaporation)
ortho-H2
para-H2
ΔU=700kJ/kg
Vaporization ΔU=452 kJ/kg
Hydrogen annual merit review, LLNL, June 8, 2010, p. 7
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Chemical Hydrides
• Examples: NH3, N2H4, B2H6, NaBH4…• Gravimetric density up to 20%-wt (LiBH4)• Volumetric density up to 0.2 kg/liter• Many are safe and sound, but not always• Cost high except NH3 and hydrocarbons• Regeneration has been problematic • Utilization is less straight forwards than H2.
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Chemical Hydrides: Examples• Hydrocarbons: CH4, C2H6… (complicated reforming
H2, dirty byproducts)• NH3 (Ammonia) N2H4 (hydrazine) (toxic and … it stinks) • B2H6 (diborane) (highly toxic)• Borohydrides (LiBH4, NaBH4…) (relatively safe) • Alanates (NaAlH4…) (highly reactive)
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Chemical Hydrides: Borohydrides
• LiBH4, very high H content, but not soluble • NaBH4, 12%-wt H dry• NaBH4, can be made to 30% H2O
solution• NaBH4, 6%-wt H in 35% H2O stabilized
with ammonium hydroxide• Safe, low toxicity • Still a challenge in regeneration
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Observed H2 Capacity, weight %
IRMOF-177
bridged cat./IRMOF-8
Ca(BH4)2
LiBH4/MgH2
Li3AlH6/Mg(NH2)2
LiNH2/MgH2
LiMn(BH4)3 Mg(BH4)(AlH4)
Na2Zr(BH4)6
PANI
8
10
8
6
4
2
0
16
14
12
100 200 300 400
Temperature for observed H2 release (ºC)H2 sorption temperature (ºC)
00-100-200
metal hydrides
Mg(BH4)2(NH3)2
Mg(BH4)2
solid AB (NH3BH3)
chemical hydrides
CH Regen.Required
sorbents
?
PCN-12C aerogelcarbide-deri ved CB/CMOF-74
MD C-foambridged cat./AX21
AB/cat. AlH3
MD C-foam LiBH4/CA
2015 Ca(BH4)2/2LiBH4
Ti-MOF-16M-doped CAPANI
Li-AB Mg(BH4)2(NH3)2AB ionic liq. AlB4H11
M-B-N-H MgH2
LiMgN Li3AlH6/LiNH21,6 naphthyridine
liq. AB/cat. Mg-Li-B-N-H
NaAlH4
NaMn(BH4)4PANI
2009 Progress & Accomplishments
Status at 2009 AMR ReviewMaterial capacity
must exceedsystem targets
Ultimate
NPRE 498 Energy Storage
Observed H2 Capacity, weight %
Mg(BH4)(AlH4)
solid AB (NH3BH3)
MD C-foamCsC24 Ti-MOF-16 Na2Zr(BH4)6 PANI
AB ionic liq.
Bridged cat/AX21
Ti(AB)4
AB+AF(Me-Cell)Mg(BH4)2(NH3)2AlB4H11
Mg(BH4)2(NH3)2
BC8
sorbents
LiBH4/CAMPK/PI-6 MgH2
AB/AT/PS soln Ca(AB)2LiBH4/Mg2NiH4
2015 Liq AB:MeAB LiNH2/MgH2 Mg-Li-B-N-HNaAlH4
LiMn(BH4)3 NaMn(BH4)4
9
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
16
14
-200 100 200 300 400
Temperature for observed H2 release (ºC)H2 sorption temperature (ºC)
00-100
metal hydridesMg(BH4)2(NH3)2
DADB
chemical hydrides
AB/LiNH2 LiBH4/MgH2
M-B-N-HPCN-6 KAB LiMgN Li3AlH6/LiNH2
MOF-74 PANI
AB/Cat. AlH3 Ca(BH4)2
PCN-12 LiAB Ca(BH4)2/2LiBH4
AB/IL (20% bminCl) Mg(BH4)2
Li-AB
IRMOF-177 1,6 naphthyridineAC (AX-21) Li3AlH6/Mg(NH2)2
C aerogelcarbide-deri ved CBC8B/C bridged cat./IRMOF-8
CsC24 M-doped CAC123BF8 AC(AX-21)
Material capacitymust exceed
system targets
Ultimate
2010 Progress & AccomplishmentsOpen symbols denote new materials since 2009 AMR