i-495 northern section shoulder use · 3/14/2014  · attachment 4.0.1.1 i-495 northern section...

118
LETTER OF SUBMITTAL I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE State Project No.: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501 Federal Project No.: STP-495-5(094) Contract ID No.: C00105130DB72 Submitted by: March 14, 2014 Submitted for: ORIGINAL

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL

I-495 NORTHERN SECTION

SHOULDER USEState Project No.: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501

Federal Project No.: STP-495-5(094)Contract ID No.: C00105130DB72

Submitted by:

March 14, 2014

Submitted for:

ORIGINAL

Page 2: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

1 of 3

Offerors shall furnish a copy of this Letter of Submittal Checklist, with the page references added, with the Letter of Submittal.

Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference

Page Reference

Letter of Submittal Checklist and Contents Attachment 4.0.1.1 Section 4.0.1.1 Appendix

Attachment 4.0.1.1

Acknowledgement of RFP, Revisions, and/or Addenda Attachment 3.4 (Form C-78-RFP) Sections 3.4; 4.0.1.1

Appendix Attachment

3.4

Letter of Submittal NA Sections 4.1 1

Letter of Submittal on Offeror’s letterhead NA Section 4.1.1 1

Offeror’s full legal name and address NA Section 4.1.1 1

Authorized representative’s original signature NA Section 4.1.1 3

Declaration of intent NA Section 4.1.2 1

120 day declaration NA Section 4.1.3 1

Point of Contact information NA Section 4.1.4 2

Principal Officer information NA Section 4.1.5 2

Offeror’s Corporate Structure NA Section 4.1.6 2

Full Legal Name of Lead Contractor and Lead Designer NA Section 4.1.7 2

Offeror’s VDOT prequalification information NA Section 4.1.8 2

DBE statement confirming Offeror is committed to achieving the required DBE goal NA Section 4.1.9 2

Page 3: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

2 of 3

Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference

Page Reference

Interim and Final Completion Date(s) NA Section 4.1.10 2

Attachments to the Letter of Submittal NA Section 4.2 Appendix

Attachment 4.2

Affiliated and/ or Subsidiary Companies Attachment 4.2.1 Section 4.2.1 Appendix

Attachment

4.2.1

Certification Regarding Debarment Forms Attachment 4.2.2(a)

Attachment 4.2.2(b) Section 4.2.2

Appendix Attachment

4.2.2(a)

& 4.2.2(b)

Offeror’s VDOT prequalification information NA Section 4.2.3 Appendix

Attachment 4.2.3

Evidence of obtaining bonding NA Section 4.2.4 Appendix

Attachment

4.2.4

Full size copies of DPOR licenses and SCC registrations NA Section 4.2.5 Appendix

Attachment

4.2.5

SCC registration information - businesses Attachment 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5.1 Appendix

Attachment

4.2.5.1

Page 4: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

3 of 3

Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference

Page Reference

DPOR registration information - businesses Attachment 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5.2 Appendix

Attachment 4.2.5.2

Lead Contractor Work History Form Attachment 4.2.6(a) Section 4.2.6

Appendix Attachment

4.2.6(a)

Lead Designer Work History Form Attachment 4.2.6(b) Section 4.2.6

Appendix Attachment

4.2.6(b)

Conceptual Roadway Plans NA Section 4.2.7

Appendix Attachment

4.2.7

Offerers Technical Proposal Compliance NA Section 4.2.8

Appendix Attachment

4.2.8

Page 5: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 6: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

4.1 Letter of Su

bm

ittal

Page 7: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 8: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 9: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 10: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

4.2 Attach

men

ts to the L

etter of Sub

mittal

Page 11: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.1Affiliated and Subsidiary Companies of the Offeror

Page 12: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

1 of 2  

ATTACHMENT 4.2.1

 

State Project No. (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501    

Affilia t e d a nd S ubs idia r y C ompanie s o f T he Lane Construction Corporation  

Offerors shall complete the table and include the addresses of affiliates or subsidiary companies as applicable. By completing this table, Offerors certify that all affiliated and subsidiary companies of the Offeror are listed.

 The Offeror does not have any affiliated or subsidiary companies.

X Affiliated and/ or subsidiary companies of The Lane Construction Corporation are listed below.  

Relationship with Offeror (Affiliate or Subsidiary)

 

Full Legal Name Address

PARENT COMPANY Lane Industries Incorporated 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire CT 06410

AFFILIATE Lane Worldwide Infrastructure, Inc. 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire CT 06410

AFFILIATE Lane Infrastructure. Inc. 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire, CT 06410

AFFILIATE Lane International, B.V. Prins Bernhardplein 200 1097 JB Amsterdam The Netherlands

AFFILIATE Lane Mideast Contracting, LLC P.O. Box 35243 Abu Dhabi, UAE Makeen Tower Corner of 9th and 10th Streets

AFFILIATE Lane Mideast, Qatar, LLC Grand Hamad Street Bin Al Sheikh Bldg. 3rd Floor Doha, Qatar

SUBSIDIARY Lanecon Corporation 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire, CT 06410

JOINT VENTURE (51% PARTNER)

Virginia Guardrail Partners 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire, CT 06410

Page 13: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

2 of 2  

JOINT VENTURE

(35% PARTNER) Fluor-Lane 95, LLC 6700 Las Colinas Blvd.

Irving, TX 75039

JOINT VENTURE

(20% PARTNER) AGL Constructors

729 West Adams Street Chicago, IL 60607

JOINT VENTURE

(25% PARTNER) Gemma-Lane Liberty Partners 769 Hebron Avenue

Glastonbury, CT 06033

JOINT VENTURE

(25% PARTNER) Gemma-Lane Patriot Partners 769 Hebron Avenue

Glastonbury, CT 06033

Page 14: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.2(a)Certification Regarding Debarment Forms

Primary Covered Transactions

Page 15: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 16: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.2(b)Certification Regarding Debarment Forms

Lower Tier Covered Transactions

Page 17: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 18: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 19: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 20: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 21: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.3VDOT Prequalification Supporting Documentation

Page 22: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

TRNSPORT - E22 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 02/14/2014 LSPPREQ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2:02 PM PREQUALIFIED VENDORS SORTED BY VENDOR NAME PAGE 254 THIS LIST INCLUDES ALL PREQUALIFIED LEVELS AS OF 02/14/2014 - L -

L002 THE LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION PREQ. EXP : 06/30/2014

--PREQ ADDRESS ------------------ WORK CLASSES (LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED TO) 90 FIELDSTONE COURT 002 - GRADING CHESHIRE, CT 06410-1212 003 - MAJOR STRUCTURES PHONE : 203-235-3351 004 - ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING FAX : 203-237-4260 006 - PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING 007 - MINOR STRUCTURES 045 - UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

BUSINESS CONTACT: CAIOLA, VINCENT JAMES EMAIL: [email protected] ------DBE INFORMATION------

DBE TYPE : N/A DBE CONTACT: N/A ===============================================================================

Page 23: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.4Surety Letter

Page 24: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Zurich American Insurance Company

Fidelity and Deposit Company of MurylundLiberty Mutual Insurance Compuny

l,llarch 7 , 2014

Virginia Department of Transportation

1401 East Broad Street

Richmond, VA23219

RE: The Lane Construction Corporation

Request for Proposals

l-495 Shoulder-North Section (UPC 105130)

Project No.; (FO)0495-029-123, P10'1, C50{ / Contract lD No. C00105130D872

Estimated Value of Project: $20,000,000.00 - $30,000,000.00

To Whom lt May Concern:

This letter will serve to confirm that The Lane Construction Corporation is a highly regarded and valued client of Aon Risk Services Northeast and the

sureties, Zurich American lnsurance Company (A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of A+/Superior and Financial Size Category XV), Fidelity and

Deposit Company of Maryland (A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of A+/Superior and Financial Size Category XV) and Liberty Mutual lnsurance

Company (A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of A/Excellent and Financial Size Category XV), the 'co-sureties'. Each surety company is licensed

to conduct surety business in the state of Virginia, and each surety company holds a Certificate of Authority as listed in the Department of the

Treasury's Listing of Approved Sureties (Department Circular 570) dated July 1 , 2013.

The Lane Construction Corporation has developed a strong track record of completing complex construction projects on time and within the available

budget. ln the recent past, the co-sureties have executed bonds on behalf of The Lane Construction Corporation for individual projects with contract

values approaching $350,000,000 and corresponding backlogs approachrng $2,000,000,000. At this time, The Lane Construction Corporation is

capable of obtaining 100% Performance Bond and 100% Labor and Materials Payment Bond in the amount of the anticipated cost of consiruction,

and said bonds will cover the Project and any warranty periods as provided for in the Contract Documents on behalf of the Contractor, in the event

that such firm be the successful bidder and enter into a contract for this Project.

Naturally, as is customary within the surety industry, the issuance of any bonds is contingent upon a favorable underwriting review of project

specifics including, but not limited to, the contract terms, conditions, documents, bond forms and confirmation of complete project financing by both

The Lane Conskuction Corporation and its co-suretles at the time a request for bonds is made. We assume no liability to third parties or to you by

issuance of this letter, should bid or final bonds not be issued.

Should you need additional assurance regarding the technical ability or bonding capacity of The Lane Construction Corporation, please do not

hesitate to contact this office.

Sincerely,

Zurich American lnsurance Company

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

Liberty Mutual lnsurance Company

,ir r, ) ,i( i ['*:i{^,r+r* t" fphit ,[il,1_-,-.._

'Theresan E. Row-edder

Att,rrney- in-Frct

Page 25: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYCOLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLANDPOWER OFATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of NewYork, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Maryland, and the FIDELITYAND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Maryland (herein collectively called the "Companies"), byTHOMAS O. MCCLELLAN, Vice President, in pursuance of authority granted by Article V, Section 8, of the By-Laws of saidCompanies, which are set forth on the reverse side hereofand are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, do herebynominate, constitute, and appoint Kevin A. WHITE, Mark P. HERENDEEN, Jean CORREIA, Maria CHAVES, Theresan E.ROWEDDER, Bryan HUFT, Jeffrey HENDRICKS and Jane GILSON, all of Boston, Massachusetts, EACH its true and lawful agentand Attorney-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds andundertakings, and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Companies, as

fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at its office in New York, New York., the regularly elected officers of the COLONIALAMERICAN CASUALTY AND SUREry COMPANY at its office in Owings Mills, Mary1and., and the regularly elected officers of theFIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPA|ry OF MARYLAND at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., in their own proper persons.

The said Vice President does hereby certifu that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article V, Section 8, ofthe By-Laws of said Companies, and is now in force.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice-President has hereunto subscribed his,/her names and affixed the Corporate Seals of the said

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, andFIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 30th day of May, A.D. 2013.

ATTEST:

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYCOLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPAI\TY

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPAI{Y OF MARYI,AND

+rii$H$*:<; io:

"';:rr.i,;.#SJ

Byt; ).e--{'-

Assistant SecretaryEric D. Barnes

Maria D. Adamski, Notary PublicMy Commission Expires: July 8, 2015

-{,{ * wtf-t$Vice PresidentThomas O. McClellan

State of MarylandCity of Baltimore

On this 30th day of May, A.D. 2013, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, THOMAS O.

MCCLELLAN, Vice President, and ERIC D. BARNES, Assistant Secretary, of the Companies, to me penonally known to be the individuals arrd oificers

described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and acknowledged the execution of same, and being by me duly swom, deposeth and Bith, that

he/she is the said officer ofthe Company aforesaid, and that the seals afiixed to the preceding instrument are the Corporate Seals ofsaid Companies, and that

the said Corporate Seals and the signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction ofthe said

Corporations.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affrxed my Official Seal the day and year first above written.

POA-F 063-0474

^-..,iii:[j,/,;2

+rffi

Page 26: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES

"Article V, Section 8, Attornevs-in-Fact. The Chief Executive Officer, the President, or any Executive Vice President or Vice Presidentmay, by written instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attomeys-in-fact with authority to execute bonds, policies,recognizances, stipulations, undertakings, or other like instruments on behalf of the Company, and may authorize any officer or any such

attorney-in-fact to affix the corporate seal thereto, and may with or without cause modifu of revoke any such appointment or authority at anytime."

CERTIFICATE

I, the undersigned, Vice President of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the COLONIAL AMERICANCASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and the FIDELIry AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certifu that theforegoing Power of Attomey is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certiff that Article V, Section 8, ofthe By-Laws of the Companies is still in force.

This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be sigrred by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board ofDirectors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day of December 1998.

RESOLVED: "That the signature of the President or a Vice President and the attesting signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary

and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any Power of Attorney...Any such Power or any certificate thereof bearing such

facsimile signature and seal shal1 be valid and binding on the Company."

This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board ofDirectors of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALry AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day ofMay, 1994, and the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELIry AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a

meeting duly called and held on the 1 Oth day of May, 1 990.

RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature

of ar,y Vice-President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a

certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect

as though manually affixed.

,hi, ru-EJ"]t:f:Nia'Ja1T"t' ' 'l"r"jq":to subscribed mv name and affixed the corporate seals orthe said companies'

dr& #/**

ffi-+r,*.r.ffi4.,.si.

++*r j

Geoffrey Delisio, Vice President

Page 27: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS PRINTED ON RED BACKGROUND.This Pouer of Attorney limits the acts of those named herein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated.

Cerlificate \6 {i14{i283

American Fire and Casualty CompanyThe 0hio Casualty lnsurance Company

Liberty Mutual lnsurance Company

West American lnsurance Company

POWER OF ATTORNEYKNOWN ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That American Fire & Casualty Company and The Ohio Casualty lnsurance Company are corporations duly organized under lhe laws of

andappoint, Brian Driscoll: Bryan Huft. Jane Gilson: Jean Correia: Jeffrey Hendricks: Kevin A. White: Maria Chaves: Mark P. Herendeen; Theresan E.a^,^rd.t.td,

all ofthecityof Boston ,stateof IMA eachindividuallyiftherebemorethanonenamed.itstrueandlawful attorney-in-facttomake,execute,seal,acknowledge

be as bindtng upon the Companies as if lhey have been duly signed by the president and attested by the secretary of the Companies in their own proper persons.

lN WITNESS WHEREOF thrs Power of Attorney has been subscrrbed by an authorized officer or officlal of the Companies and the corporate seals of the Compan es have been affixed

thereto this 31st day of Mav , 2013

American Fire and Casualty Company

The 0hio Casualty lnsurance CompanyLiberty Mutual lnsurance Company' :: : West American lnsurance Company

STATE 0F WASHINGTON ss

COUNTY OF KING

0n this 31 st day of l\lav , 2013 , before me personally appeared Gregory W. Davenport, who acknowledged himself to be the Assistant Secretary of American

Fire and Casualty Company. Liberty Mutual lnsurance Company, The Ohio Casualty Company, and WestAmencan lnsurance Company, and that he, as such. being authonzed so to do,

execute the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signlng on behalf of the corporat ons by himself as a duly authorized officer.

lN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my notarial seal at Seattle, Washington, on the day and year first above wrtten.

1,,

"' 1b?'L'll'*^xffi

Company. Liberty Mutual lnsurance Company, and WestAmencan lnsurance Company which resolutions are now in full force and effect reading as follornls:

the provisions of this article may be revoked at any trme by the Board, the Chairman, the President or by the officer or officers grantrng such power or authority.

executed such instruments shall be as binding as if signed by the president and attested by the secretary

Certificate of Designation - The President of the Company, acting pursuant to the Bylaws of the Company, authonzes Gregory W Davenport. Assistant Secretary to appoint such

attomeys-inJact as may be necessar to acl on behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and

other surety obligations.

the same force and effect as though manually affixed.

is in full force and effect and has not been revoked.

lN TESTIMONY wHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed rhe seals of said companres tn slTrl oay.r [}/l*efX -

, 20 F-l

By:

L[,,1S 12873 092012 232 ot 300

Page 28: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.5SCC and DPOR Information

Page 29: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.2.5 State Project No. (FO)0495-029-123, P101, C501

SCC and DPOR Information

1 of 1

Offerors shall complete the table and include the required state registration and licensure information. By completing this table, Offerors certify that their team complies with the requirements set forth in Section 4.2.5 and that all businesses listed are active and in good standing.

SCC & DPOR INFORMATION FOR BUSINESSES (RFP Sections 4.2.5.1 and 4.2.5.2)

Business Name

SCC Information (4.2.5.1) DPOR Information (4.2.5.2)

SCC Number

SCC Type of Corporation

SCC Status

DPOR Registered Address

DPOR Registration

Type

DPOR Registration

Number DPOR Expiration

Date

The Lane Construction Corporation F0254476 Foreign

Corporation Active 90 Fieldstone Court Cheshire, CT 06410

Contractor (Class A) 2701011871 01/31/2016

Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. F1343203 Foreign

Corporation Active 101 W. Broad St.,

Suite 301 Falls Church, VA 22046

Business Entity 0407005636 12/31/2015

Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. F1343203 Foreign

Corporation Active 7066 Samuel Morse Dr.

Suite 100 Columbia, MD 21046

Business Entity Branch Office 0411000839 02/29/2016

DMY Engineering Consultants Inc. 07688955 Corporation Active

45662 Terminal Drive, Suite 110

Dulles, VA 20166 Business Entity 0407005631 12/31/2015

Quinn Consulting Services Incorporated 04925517 Corporation Active

4094 Majestic Ln. # 281

Fairfax, VA 22033 Business Entity 0407003733 12/31/2015

Rinker Design Associates, P.C. 02270627 Corporation Active

9385 Discovery Blvd. Suite 200

Manassas, VA 20109 Business Entity 04050005024

12/31/2015

Page 30: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.5.1SCC Supporting Documentation

Page 31: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 32: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 33: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 34: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.5.2DPOR Supporting Documentation

Page 35: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 36: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 37: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 38: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.6(a)Lead Contractor Work History Form

Page 39: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)

LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design

consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.

c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)

Original Contract Value

Final or Estimated Contract Value

I-495 EXPRESS LANES Fairfax County, Virginia HNTB

Name of Client./ Owner: Virginia Department of Transportation Phone: 571.483.2600 Project Manager: John Lynch, P.E. Phone: 571.238.2970 Email: [email protected]

12/2012 11/2012 (early delivery) $1,346,560 $1,481,670 $642,000

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly.

PROJECT SCOPE Construction of four new general-purpose traffic lanes (two in each direction) outside of the existing lanes on the Capital Beltway. Work included the reconstruction of ramps, interchanges, frontage roads, overpasses and underpasses, bridges and other necessary crossings. VDOT began studying short and long-term solutions to growing traffic congestion on the Capital Beltway in the late 1980s. By 1994 it had concluded High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes were needed. A private developer submitted plans for High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes in 2002 to the Commonwealth, which resulted in selecting that alternative in 2005. The Express Lanes project is the most significant package of improvements to the Capital Beltway in a generation. They provide drivers with the option of paying a toll for a faster, more predictable trip. Drivers using the Express Lanes have access to (HOV) lanes usually limited to vehicles with multiple occupants.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION LANE constructed two new lanes in each direction on a 14-mile stretch of I-495 from the Springfield Interchange to just north of the Dulles Toll Road. The project encompassed the replacement of more than $260 million of aging infrastructure, including more than 50 bridges and overpasses. Three new access points to the Capital Beltway at Rte. 29/Lee Highway, Westpark Bridge and Jones Branch Drive were designed and constructed as well as upgrades to 12 key interchanges. LANE also built more than 70,000 linear feet of sound walls to double the existing protection for local neighborhoods. LANE managed the ITS, communications and toll systems performed by subcontractors. LANE’s Virginia Sign and Lighting division performed significant electronic sign and highway electrical work.

PROJECT BENEFITS The new Express Lanes offer faster travel choices and congestion relief for motorists in the northern Virginia/Washington, D.C. region. Benefits to drivers, carpoolers, public transportation users and the business community already include: Less stop-and-go traffic Improved opportunities for reliable bus service for public transportation users Reduced cut-through traffic on local neighborhood streets Positive environmental impact because vehicles move through the area more quickly, reducing emissions

EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE “A solid experienced company that has built to standard and worked well under difficult traffic and space constraints to minimize impact on travel.” - Garrett Moore, P.E., VDOT Chief Engineer

“Project was built over four years under traffic as high as 200,000 vpd and achieved 5 million safe work hours as of September 2012 without a lost-time incident, making it among the safest heavy civil projects ever built in the U.S.” - Public Works Financing Newsletter, December 2012 The I-495 Express Lanes project has been the recipient of numerous awards including a safety award for more than 5,000,00 manhours without lost time incidents … and most recently was one of the Construction Management Association of America’s 2013 project award winers.

SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY

Design-Build project Surveying Asphalt paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and striping Overhead sign structures and

associated lighting Dynamic message signs Overhead lane control system ITS devices/systems (DMS, CCTV,

detection, video analytics, lane control)

Electrical,communications, and fiber optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups

Configuring, integrating, and testing new ATM field devices

Field support for system software integration and testing

Drainage, erosion and sediment control

Stormwater management Concrete barrier and pier protection Extensive MOT Inspection, testing, quality

assurance and control

KEY PERSONNEL ON PROJECT

Kaushik Vyas, QA Manager Nagy Abdelwahed, QC Manager Daryoush Parendeh, QA Inspector Dennis Rodkey, Superintendent

Page 40: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)

LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design

consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.

c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)

Original Contract Value

Final or Estimated Contract Value

NORTH AREA ROADS IMPROVEMENT

Dulles, VA JMT

Name of Client./ Owner: MWAA Phone: 703.417.8647 Project Manager: David Swennes Phone: 703.417.8647 Email: [email protected]

03/2008 11/2007 (early delivery) $29,681 $29,681 $29,681

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION The North Area Roads Improvement project focused on the Dulles Area Access Highway (DIAAH) and associated areas and included: The construction of a new Collector-Distributor (C-D) Roadway system for the section of the DIAAH between Saarinen Circle and Route 28. The new C-D Roadway separates the Route 28 exiting traffic from DIAAH traffic destined for further on, thereby reducing the traffic congestion at three interchanges. Widening of the DIAAH from a four-lane to a six-lane highway to provide sufficient capacity for future DIAAH traffic. The project included the existing roadway demolition and the reconstruction and widening of 1.25 miles of the DIAAH entering and exiting the airport including bituminous concrete roadways, a 60±-foot span steel girder bridge, drainage improvements and storm water management facilities, overhead sign structures, and related traffic control, lighting and safety features. The project also included the widening of an existing bridge (inbound DIAAH over Horsepen Run) and the construction of a new bridge (inbound Collector-Distributor Road over Horsepen Run). The bridge required construction of a 60’, two-lane span with an integrated back wall and mechanically stabilized earth wall and included short and medium span steel plate girder designs . The project involved the construction of one large 8’ by 4’ by 295’ long concrete box culvert and a smaller 8’ by 4’ by 69’ long concrete box culvert. Two retaining walls were also included to allow the widening eastbound of the DIAAH and the construction of the inbound Collector-Distributor roadways to pass under existing bridges without reconstructing those bridges. The ultimate goal of the North Area Roads Improvement project was to create a roadway system capable of providing efficient access to Dulles International Airport that is easy for aiport patrons to understand and use.

PROJECT BENEFITS Provides airport passengers with better access to rental car facilities and long term parking lots Reduces traffic congestion and delays Improves traffic flow and roadway connectivity Improves passenger service

EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE LANE completed this project four months ahead of schedule.

Dulles Airport presented the project with the “Outstanding Safety Record Award” for the fourth quarter of 2006.

SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY

Surveying Asphalt paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and striping Overhead sign structures and associated

lighting Dynamic message signs Overhead lane control system ITS devices/systems (DMS, CCTV,

detection, video analytics, lane control) Electrical, communications, and fiber

optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups Configuring, integrating, and testing

new ATM field devices Field support for system software

integration and testing Drainage, erosion and sediment control Stormwater management Concrete barrier and pier protection Maintenance of traffic Inspection, testing, quality assurance

and control KEY PERSONNEL

Ken Prince, DB Project Manager Nagy Abdelwahed, QC Manager

Page 41: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)

LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design

consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.

c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)

Original Contract Value

Final or Estimated Contract Value

I-66 SPOT IMPROVEMENTS

Arlington County, VA HNTB

Name of Client/Owner: VDOT Phone: 703.259.3240 Project Manager: Charles Mel Harvey Phone: 703.259.3240 Email: [email protected]

12/2011 12/2011 $10,200 $9,800 $9,800

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly.

PROJECT SCOPE This project consisted of the construction of a third lane on I-66 from the Fairfax Drive on ramp to the Sycamore Street off-ramp.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION LANE performed as the Lead Contractor on this first of three spot improvements on I-66 to reduce congestion and increase safety along westbound I-66 inside the Capital Beltway. This project added a third lane between the interchanges of the Fairfax Drive on-ramp (just west of George Mason Drive) to the existing deceleration lane at the Sycamore Street off-ramp (1.9 miles). The westbound acceleration and deceleration lane between Fairfax Drive and Sycamore Street was lengthened to form a continuous auxiliary lane between the two ramps. A new 12-foot-wide shoulder was constructed with full-strength pavement capable of carrying traffic during emergencies. LANE integrated ATMS elements into the existing VDOT system. The work included: sight distance improvements, variable and static message signs, traffic management systems, roadway lighting and landscaping in selected areas. All work was performed within the existing right-of-way. A multi-phased (three phases) construction approach was implemented to minimize the inconvenience to the traveling public through the area and get the completed road under traffic prior to inclement weather. Although motorists were expected to experience periodic lane closures until the project was complete, all lane closures were at night (no daytime, weekend or holiday closures) and the lack of disruption on this heavily-traveled interstate was notable. This project included similar circumsatnces to the I-495 Shoulder Use project and added much needed capacity to a heavily congested commuter thoroughfare. This enhancement also served the local population well for their everyday access through the community The project also included site access and egress challenges as well as tight work areas. In order to mitigate any impediments to the project, LANE worked closely with VDOT to establish MOTplans and conducted extensive orientation and training for supervisors and workers.

PROJECT BENEFITS This project added much needed capacity to this heavily congested commuter thoroughfare. This enhancement also serves the local population well for their everyday access through the community.

EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE The project was completed on time and the additional lane opened to traffic on December 5, 2011.

SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY

Surveying Asphalt paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and striping Overhead sign structures and

associated lighting Dynamic message signs Overhead lane control system ITS devices/systems (DMS, CCTV,

detection, video analytics, lane control)

Electrical,communications, and fiber optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups

Configuring, integrating, and testing new ATM field devices

Field support for system software integration and testing

Drainage, erosion and sediment control

Stormwater management Concrete barrier and pier protection Maintenance of traffic Inspection, testing, quality

assurance and control

Page 42: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.6(b)Lead Designer Work History Form

Page 43: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)

LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.

c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)

Construction Contract Value (Original)

Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)

I-95 SECTION 100 EXPRESS TOLL LANES I-895 TO MD 43 DESIGN

Baltimore, MD

Cherry Hill

Name of Client: Maryland Transportation Authority (MdTA) Phone: 410.537.7848 Project Manager: Dave LaBella, P.E. Phone:410.537.7848 Email: [email protected]

Fall/2014 Fall/2014 $142,600 $142,600 $3,200

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant. Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. performed all of the design work out of their Falls Church, VA office.

PROJECT SCOPE Construction of Express Toll Lanes (ETLs) on the most congested portion of I-95 north of Baltimore City. This 8-mile segment stretches from the I-895 (N) split in east Baltimore City, to north of MD 43 in White Marsh. When completed there will be two ETLs and four general-purpose lanes in each direction. Drivers traveling from north of MD 43 through to I-895 will have the choice of using the general-purpose lanes at no cost or paying a toll to use the ETLs. In addition, ETL access for drivers traveling on MD 43 will be provided to and from the south along I-95. The tolls will be managed to maintain relatively congestion-free traffic flow. The toll for using the ETLs will vary depending on the time of day and amount of traffic on the road.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION As a subconsultant, Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. (SWA), prepared a multitude of ITS, highway design, traffic engineering design and traffic analyses.

I-95 Express Toll Lanes Planning and Preliminary Engineering: SWA performed Highway Capacity Manual analyses for the IAPA report including Basic Freeway Segments, Weaving, and Ramps. SWA prepared micro simulation using VISSIM of the proposed geometrics of I-95 Section 100. The simulation models consisted of eight interchanges and over 15 miles of interstate highways. The simulation was prepared for 2025 Build conditions and 2010 Build and No-Build conditions. SWA prepared the signing concept plans for I-95 section 100, which consists of eleven miles of highway (I-95) and five interchanges with both general purpose and managed (toll) travel lanes. The work included inventory and evaluation of existing signing, development of 24 base plans, development of conceptual layouts, meeting with MdTA and the GEC to refine the concepts, development of final plans including sign size layout, detailed location design and support type selection.

I-95 Final ITS Design: SWA prepared ITS design for I-95 Section 100 that included 20 DMS signs, 15 CCTV Cameras, 2 Automatic Traffic Recorders, 8 Toll Rate Signs, Over Height Vehicle Detection Systems, Road Weather Information Systems (RWIS), and prepared details for conduit layout for ITS devices on five Toll Gantries. The ITS design included power and communications design for the ITS devices, Automatic Gate Control Systems, Toll Gantries, Over Height Vehicle Detection Systems, RWIS, and HAR. SWA prepared lighting and sign lighting design along I-95 from I-695 to north of MD 43, including point by point calculations photometric analysis on the proposed pavement surface, light trespass calculations, and veiling luminance calculations. SWA prepared traffic signalization design for two Baltimore City intersections. In addition, SWA developed the ITS standards, special provisions, and structural design and mounting details. SWA is also responsible for all sighting analysis of all CCTV, DMSs, RWIS, and HARs designed under contract including coordination with various utility companies including electrical, telephone and fiber optic.

PROJECT BENEFITS

The addition of toll lanes addresses the capacity and safety needs on Section 100 and thereby improves access, mobility, and safety for local, regional, and inter-regional traffic, including passenger, freight, and transit vehicles.

EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE

The I-95 Express Toll Lanes Project has received 14 awards for the work on this project, ranging from National to Local awards for Quality in Engineering, Construction, Partnering in Planning, Structures, Pavement, and others. The full list is available here: http://www.i-95expresstolllanes.com/contractor/awards.asp

SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY

Surveying Asphalt paving Underlying concrete joint

repairs Signing and striping Overhead sign structures and

associated lighting Dynamic message signs ITS devices/systems (DMS,

CCTV, detection, video analytics, lane control)

Electrical, communications, and fiber optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups

Configuring, integrating, and testing new ATM field devices

Concrete barrier and pier protection

Maintenance of traffic Inspection, testing, quality

assurance and control

PROPOSED PERSONNEL FOR I-495 SHOULDER USE

Keith Riniker, PE, PTOE Bill Monroe, TSOS Jyothi Paladugu, PE, PTOE Images courtesy www.i-95expresstolllanes.com

I-95 and I-895 Interchange

I-695 with Future ETLs Highlighted

Future MD 43

Page 44: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)

LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.

c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)

Construction Contract Value (Original)

Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)

INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR (ICC)

CONTRACT A Montgomery County, MD

INTERCOUNTY CONSTRUCTORS,

A JOINT VENTURE OF GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CORMAN

CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND G.A. & F.C. WAGMAN, INC.

Name of Client: Maryland State Highway Administration Phone: 410.545.8772 Project Manager: Melinda Peters, P.E. Phone:410.545.8772 Email: [email protected]

12/2010 12/2010 $478,700 $478,700 $2,400

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant.

PROJECT SCOPE Contract A was the first and westernmost portion of the ICC, extending seven miles from I-370 to just east of MD 97 in Montgomery County. The Intercounty Connector linked existing and developed areas between the I-270/I-370 and I-95/US 1 corridors within central and eastern Montgomery County and northwestern Prince George's County with a state-of-the-art, multi-modal east-west highway that limits access and accommodates the movement of passengers and goods. PROJECT DESCRIPTION As a Subconsultant, Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. (SWA) was responsible for the preparation of traffic engineering design plans. The work included extensive coordination with the Contractor and the State Highway Administration General Engineering Consultant for design modifications to provide better value and increased safety, while facilitating construction activities and minimizing costs. A majority of the design work was done out of the Design-Build Team’s project office with some aspects being performed in SWA’s Columbia, MD office. SWA’s work on this project consisted of the following:

A multi-staged MOT design with more than 90 plan sheets and included modifications to six miles of existing interstate roadway, construction of six miles of new interstate roadway with two new interchanges, modifications to four miles of arterial roadways, and seven bridges along roadways crossing over the ICC. The design included temporary channelization devices, signs, temporary roadways and markings and involved close coordination with the Contractor to improve constructability and reduce construction costs and duration. A Transportation Management Plan that evaluated MOT impacts to vehicular and pedestrian traffic, sequencing of construction, haul routes, impacts to/from nearby construction projects and impacts to emergency response. It included preparing conceptual MOT phasing in coordination with the contractor and MOT traffic analyses to evaluate traffic impacts during construction Prepared more than 150 sheets of signing and marking plans for six miles of new interstate roadway, six miles of signing modifications to existing interstate roadways, six interchanges, and five miles of signing modifications to arterial roadways. SWA was also responsible for the structural design for several of the proposed overhead and cantilever sign structures where the use of standard sign structures was not possible. Traffic signal and interconnect design for six intersections on three corridors including temporary signal and interconnect designs for MOT Signal warrant analyses based on MD MUTCD warrants for six intersections, corridor-wide CORSIM models for ICC and the intersecting arterials, intersection Level of Service and simulation analyses using Synchro/SimTraffic, and coordination of signal timing plans using Synchro and Montgomery County policies and traffic analyses for construction impacts. Temporary and permanent lighting designs, including lighting for two interchanges, continuous lighting along cross streets, underlass lighting, culvert lighting, tunnel lighting, and sign lighting. including photometric analyses with point-by-point calculations on the proposed pavement surface, light trespass calculations and veiling luminance calculations.

PROJECT BENEFITS This project provided a much-needed connection between MD 97 and the I-270 corridor reducing congestion on several local arteries and making them safer by removing conflicts between cross-county commuters, trucks and local residents. EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE The ICC team including Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. was awarded Engineering News Record’s (ENR) Northeast Region Best Project of 2011 for the successful completion of the ICC Contract A Project. Subsequent contracts B,C, and D/E, which SWA was designer on, have since won 16 major national awards to date.

SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY

• Design-Build • Surveying • Asphalt Paving • Signing and Striping • Overhead Sign Structures and

Associated Lighting • Dynamic Message Signs • Overhead Lane Control

System • ITS Devices/Systems • Electrical, Communications,

Fiber Optic Conduit, Wiring and Hook-ups

• MOT • Inspection, Testing, QA & C

PROPOSED PERSONNEL FOR I-495 SHOULDER USE

Keith Riniker, PE Bill Monroe, TSOS

Page 45: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

SIMILARITIES IN SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY

Surveying Signing and striping Dynamic message signs ITS devices/systems (DMS,

CCTV, detection, video analytics, lane control)

Electrical, communications, and fiber optic conduit, wiring, and hook-ups

Configuring, integrating, and testing new ATM field devices

Field support for system software integration and testing

Inspection, testing, quality assurance and control

PROPOSED PERSONNEL FOR I-495 SHOULDER USE

Keith Riniker, PE, PTOE Bill Monroe, TSOS Jyothi Paladugu, PE, PTOE Ziad Sabra, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Dustin Schlipp, PE

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)

LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.

c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)

Construction Contract Value (Original)

Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)

CITY OF BALTIMORE ATMS CONTRACT NO. 880

Baltimore, MD MASTEC

Name of Client: City of Baltimore Phone: 443.984.2158 Project Manager: Raj Sharma Phone: 443.984.2158 Email: [email protected]

2013 Fall 2013 $42,500 $42,500 $4,500

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant.

PROJECT SCOPE Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. (SWA) provided a multitude of traffic engineering, planning and design services for the upgrade of the signal system, which is currently in operation and controlling 960 signals in the City. All design work was done out of SWA’s Baltimore, MD office (which has since moved to Columbia, MD) and consisted of the following:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION Traffic Signal System & Signal Timing Upgrades: SWA provided functional specifications to replace 1,300 signal controllers, construction plans and specifications to replace 17 communication hubs, technical specifications to replace the existing Transportation Management Center, technical specifications for a professional services contract for system integration to replace the signal system hardware and software including electronic test equipment and test procedures, and construction management and inspection services for the replacement of signal controllers. Following the completion of the ATMS upgrade, SWA retimed the City traffic signals in two phases and included traffic data collection, traffic engineering analysis, signal timing design, and field implementation and fine tuning of the optimized signal timing plans.

Transportation Management Center: SWA performed TMC planning, procurement, and central signal system integration. Under the construction management services, SWA was responsible for the day-to-day reporting of construction activities, preparing daily inspection reports, reviewing and approving invoices on behalf of City staff, representing the City of Baltimore at meetings with contractors, acting as a liaison between City agencies and contractors, and coordinating and conducting progress meetings with contractors and City of Baltimore managers and subordinates. ITS Design & Communication Upgrades: SWA prepared $6.5 M Federal Aid Job-Order-Contracts (bid book specifications) and final engineering plans for the construction of ten CCTV cameras and eleven Dynamic Message Signs in the City of Baltimore. SWA prepared the specifications for cameras, encoders, copper and fiber communication equipment, poles and cabinets, quantities and estimates. SWA also prepared CCTV design including bucket truck sighting analyses, photo renderings for DMS, location design, power and communication design, and design support during construction.

Traffic Signal Design: SWA prepared $4M Federal Aid Job-Order-Contracts (bid book specifications) for Signal Reconstruction, Signal Rewiring and Detector Replacement. Prepared 34 traffic signal designs and 20 detector replacements including wireless, video and inductive loops. Signal work included preparation of base plans including as-builds of signal equipment and surveys, field review of existing equipment, utility and ROW research, signal design and pedestrian detection, and ADA ramp design. SWA also prepared the City’s signal design checklist.

PROJECT BENEFITS This project provided a new TMC to the City, new CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs, new traffic signal infrastructure, and improved signal timings.

EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE “Now that this project is concluded, we all feel the improvement in signal timing progression, lesser delays and the obvious reduction in stops in and around the City of Baltimore Central Business District and gateway arterials. The success of this project is attributed to the hard work, commitment, technical skills of your staff, and the leadership Sabra, Wang & Associates, Inc. has exhibited on this contract.” – Raj Sharma, Engineering Supervisor, Signal Section Traffic Division, City of Baltimore

DMS Design

CCTV Upgrade

Signal Upgrade

Transportation Management Center

Page 46: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.7 Conceptual Roadway Plans

Page 47: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

DESIGN

’95 CADD LEVEL STRUCTURE

SURVEY HYDRAULICS - DRAINAGE

ENDWALLS (CELLS)

END SECTIONS (CELLS)

LEVEL 28

LEVEL 29

LEVEL 30

(STOP BARS & CROSSWALKS)

EXISTING TRANSVERSE MARKINGS

EXISTING HATCHING

LEVEL 45

LEVEL 46

LEVEL 47

LEVEL 48

LEVEL 49

LEVEL 50

LEVEL 51

GUARDRAIL AND JERSEY BARRIER

PROPOSED HATCHING

PAVEMENT MARKINGS LABELS

LEVEL 25

LEVEL 26

LEVEL 27

LEVEL 28

LEVEL 29

LEVEL 30

LEVEL 31

SIGN DETAIL SHEET

SIGN SCHEDULE SHEET

VA AND VIA STRUCTURE SHEETLEVEL 32

LEVEL 33

LEVEL 34

LEVEL 35 PROPOSED UNDER BRIDGE LIGHTING

LEVEL 36

LEVEL 37

LEVEL 38

LEVEL 39

LEVEL 40

LEVEL 41

LEVEL 42

LEVEL 43

LEVEL 44

LEVEL 52

SIGNAL LEGEND

SIGNAL POLE LEGEND

SIGNING LEGEND

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

LIGHTING LEGEND

SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES

’CLIP MASK’ BOUNDARIES

’CLIP BOUNDARY’ BOUNDARIES

LEVEL 62

LEVEL 63

LEVEL 53

LEVEL 54

LEVEL 55

LEVEL 56

LEVEL 57

LEVEL 58

LEVEL 59

LEVEL 60

LEVEL 61

SIGNAL HEAD SIGHT LINES - NB

SIGNAL HEAD SIGHT LINES - SB

SIGNAL HEAD SIGHT LINES - EB

SIGNAL HEAD SIGHT LINES - WB

BORDER SNAP LOCATIONS

PRINT BOUNDARY

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

ANNOTATION FOR LEVELS 1 - 30

GENERAL NOTES & PLAN NOTES

DIMENSIONS, TERMINATORS

WOOD LINE, TREES, SHRUBS, HEDGEROWS

SEPTIC TANKS, DRAIN FIELDS, WELLS

RIGHT OF WAY AND RIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTS

STATE, COUNTY AND CITY BOUNDARY LINES

ANNOTATION FOR LEVELS 1 - 30

LEVEL 1

EDGE OF PAVEMENT & PRIVATE ENTRANCES

ANNOTATION FOR LEVELS 1 - 24

TO BE PLACED BY ROAD DESIGNERS

RESERVED FOR MISC. DRAIN. ITEMS

LEVEL 55-60

LEVEL 31-54

LEVEL 25-29

LEVEL 31-60

PIPES FROM 4" TO 42" (CUSTOM LINE STYLES)

PIPES 48" AND LARGER (CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

STANDARD BOX CULVERTS LC=0, WT=5

MANHOLES AND JUNCTION BOXES (CELLS)

DROP INLETS DI-2 SERIES (CELLS)

DROP INLETS DI-3 SERIES (CELLS)

DROP INLETS DI-4 SERIES (CELLS)

DROP INLETS DI-7 SERIES (CELLS)

DROP INLETS DI-10 SERIES (CELLS)

DROP INLETS DI-11 AND DI-13 SERIES (CELLS)

DROP INLETS DI-12 SERIES (CELLS)

DROP INLETS DI-14 SERIES (CELLS)

SWM BASIN (BASELINE/ALIGNMENT)

SWM BASIN (PLAN VIEW/CONTOURS)

SWM BASIN (MISCELLANEOUS/ITEMS)

SWM BASIN (DESCRIPTIONS/NOTES)

NOTE: ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE LABELS ON LEVEL 31

ANNOTATION FOR LEVELS 1 - 30LEVEL 31-60

LEVEL 28-30

(EC-1, RIPRAP, CHECK DAMS) (CELLS)

PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL STONE

(SEDIMENT TRAPS & BASINS)

PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

(DIVERSION DIKES & DITCHES)

PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

(TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNELS)

PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(MISCELLANEOUS DIVERSION ITEMS)

PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(BRUSH BARRIERS, LEVEL SPREADERS, ETC.)

PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

PHASE I - PROPOSED DRAINAGE (PIPES)

LEVEL 31-60

SIGN FACES & NUMBERS (Legend)

PROPOSED AND EXISTING SIGNAL FACES & NUMBERS

CONDUIT, WIRE, JUNCTION BOXES

UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT LABELS

OVERHEAD UTILITY HEIGHT INFORMATION

EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS (LONGITUDINAL)

PHASE INFO, SIGNAL POLE DETAIL

LABELS SIGNAL HEAD LABELS, SIGN LABELS,

ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT LABELS SIGNAL POLE

EXISTING LETTERS/ARROWS/SYMBOLS

PROPOSED LETTERS/ARROWS/SYMBOLS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE & CELLS)

UNDERDRAIN OUTLET PIPE AND EW-12 ENDSECTIONS

CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES, FOUNDATIONS, DUCT CABLE

PROPOSED UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT

EXIST. CONDUIT/CABLE IDENTIFIER LABLE

LUMINAIRE LABEL, CONDUIT/CABLE IDENTIFIER LABEL,

LIGHTING LABELS POLE LOCATION LABEL,

BORDER TEXT - FILL-IN PRELIMINARY PLANS TITLE

PROPOSED SIGNAL POLES FOUNDATIONS

CLEARZONE TEMPLATES FOR SIGNAL/LIGHT POLES

OVERHEAD SIGN SUPPORT DATA SUMMARY & NOTES

EXISTING SIGN CALL-OUT

SIGN NUMBER/CALL-OUTS PROPOSED SIGN CALL-OUT,

DIRECTIONAL ARROWS (LANE ARRANGEMENTS ARROWS)

PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS (LONGITUDINAL)

VIDEO DETECTION ZONES, MICROLOOP PROBES

EXISTING LOOPS/VIDEO DETECTION ZONES LOOPS,

VIDEO DETECTION ZONES, MICROLOOP PROBE

PROPOSED LOOPS/VIDEO DETECTION ZONES LOOPS,

PHASE I - PROPOSED DRAINAGE (SWM)

PHASE I - PROPOSED CONTOURS

PHASE I - SYMBOLS, LEGEND AND NOTES

(EC-1, RIPRAP, CHECK DAMS) (CELLS)

PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL STONE

(SEDIMENT TRAPS & BASINS)

PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

(DIVERSION DIKES & DITCHES)

PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

(TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNELS)

PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(MISCELLANEOUS DIVERSION ITEMS)

PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

PHASE I - TEMPORARY DRAINAGE (PIPES)

(BRUSH BARRIERS, LEVEL SPREADERS, ETC.)

PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

PHASE II - TEMPORARY DRAINAGE (PIPES)

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

PHASE II - PROPOSED DRAINAGE (PIPES)

PHASE II - PROPOSED DRAINAGE (SWM)

PHASE II - PROPOSED CONTOURS

PHASE II - SYMBOLS, LEGEND AND NOTES

SEDIMENT CONTROL

EROSION &

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 6

LEVEL 7

LEVEL 8

LEVEL 9

LEVEL 10

LEVEL 1 1

CURB AND GUTTER

STEPS

RETAINING WALLS

LEVEL 16

LEVEL 1 7

LEVEL 12

LEVEL 13

LEVEL 14

LEVEL 15

LEVEL 61

LEVEL 62

LEVEL 63

LEVEL 18

LEVEL 19

LEVEL 20

LEVEL 21

LEVEL 22

LEVEL 23

LEVEL 24

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 6

LEVEL 7

LEVEL 8

LEVEL 9

LEVEL 10

LEVEL 1 1

CURB AND GUTTER

CURB

PAVED SHOULDER

STEPS

FENCES

RETAINING WALLS

LEVEL 16

LEVEL 1 7

LEVEL 12

LEVEL 13

LEVEL 14

LEVEL 15

LEVEL 61

LEVEL 62

LEVEL 63

LEVEL 18

LEVEL 19

LEVEL 20

LEVEL 21

LEVEL 22

PAVED DITCHES

RAILROADS, ETC.

LEVEL 23

LEVEL 24

BASELINE & SUB-TANGENTS

BRIDGES

GUARDRAIL & JERSEY BARRIER

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

BRIDGES

LEVEL 25

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 6

LEVEL 7

LEVEL 8

LEVEL 9

LEVEL 10

LEVEL 1 1

LEVEL 12

LEVEL 13

LEVEL 14

LEVEL 15

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 6

LEVEL 7

LEVEL 8

LEVEL 9

LEVEL 10

LEVEL 1 1

LEVEL 16

LEVEL 1 7

LEVEL 12

LEVEL 13

LEVEL 14

LEVEL 15

LEVEL 61

LEVEL 18

LEVEL 19

LEVEL 20

LEVEL 21

LEVEL 22

LEVEL 23

LEVEL 24

LEVEL 26

LEVEL 27

LEVEL 62

LEVEL 63

LEVEL 25

TYPICAL DITCH DETAILS

PROJECT NOTES

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

NOT ASSIGNED

SIDEWALK AND/OR BICYCLE TRAIL

NOT ASSIGNED

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 6

LEVEL 7

LEVEL 8

LEVEL 9

LEVEL 10

LEVEL 1 1

LEVEL 16

LEVEL 1 7

LEVEL 12

LEVEL 13

LEVEL 14

LEVEL 15

LEVEL 18

LEVEL 19

LEVEL 20

LEVEL 21

LEVEL 22

LEVEL 23

LEVEL 24

LEVEL 26

LEVEL 27

LEVEL 25

NOT ASSIGNED

PROJECT NOTES

LEVEL 61

LEVEL 62

LEVEL 63

LEVEL 16

LEVEL 1 7

LEVEL 18

LEVEL 19

LEVEL 20

LEVEL 21

LEVEL 22

LEVEL 23

LEVEL 24

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

DITCHES AND FLUMES WT=4, LC=0

AND SPRING BOXES (CELLS)

ENERGY DISSIPATORS, PIPE SPILLOUT

(EC-1, RIPRAP CHANNEL, ETC.) (CELLS)

STONE & OUTLET PROTECTION

LUMINAIRES, ARMS, ELECTRICAL SERVICE, CONTROL CENTER

PROPOSED ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT POLES,

SLEEVE

JACKING PIT - 20’ PIPE SLEEVE JACKING PIT - 10’ PIPE

STAGING AREAS DIRECTIONAL BORE STAGING AREA,

(STOP BARS & CROSSWALKS)

PROPOSED TRANSVERSE MARKINGS

TCD’s, LABELS AND LEADERS

EXISTING AND PROPOSED ROW PROPOSED R/W FOR

(SYMBOLS)

EXISTING SIGN LOCATIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES

SIGNS TO BE REMOVED

FACES, EXISTING SIGN LEADERS, ’X’ FOR EXISTING

EXISTING SIGN FACES & LEADERS EXISTING SIGN

(SYMBOLS)

PROPOSED SIGN LOCATIONS, INCLUDING STRUCTURES

ITEMS

PHASE I - MISCELLANEOUS EROSION CONTROL

ITEMS

PHASE II - MISCELLANEOUS EROSION CONTROL

PAVED & GRAVEL SHOULDER

WALKS (AROUND HOUSES & BUILDINGS)

FENCES & GATES

GUARDRAIL & JERSEY BARRIER

LEVEL 26 UTILITY EASEMENTS

LEVEL 30 EXISTING NOISE BARRIER WALLS

LEVEL 27 WELANDS

LEVEL 30 PROPOSED NOISE BARRIER WALLS & ANNOTATION

CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES, MANHOLES

EXISTING UNDERGROUND SIGNAL EQUIPMENT

NOTE:

information will be in separate files.in a separate file. Digital Terrain ModelSurvey Utility information will be

CURB & CONCRETE ISLANDS

SWIMMING POOLSBUILDINGS, PORCHES, DECKS, PATIOS &

POSTS, GAS ISLANDS & PLAYSETS

CONCRETE SLABS, BALLARDS, COLUMNS, SIGNS,

TANKS

ABOVE GROUND TANKS, DUMPSTERS, PROPANE

BODIES OF WATER, STREAMS, LAKES, ETC.

CULVERT PIPES

CATCH BASINS, DROP INLETS & DI MANHOLES

DAMS, ENDWALLS & ENDSECTIONS

DRAINAGE ITEMS

PAVED DITCHES, RIPRAP

ALL RAILROAD ITEMS, RAILROAD TIES

CEMETERY LOCATION & GRAVES

MONITORING WELLS, VENT PIPES, ETC.

GAS PUMPS, GAS TANKS, FILLER CAPS, LEVEL 28

MINE INFORMATIONLEVEL 29

NORTH ARROW, SCALE BAR, ETC.

TRAFFIC SIGNES IN R/W, BASE PLAN SHEET,

CENTERLINE, TRAVERSE, CONTROL STATION

ASPHALT PARKING LOTEDGE OF PAVEMENT, GRAVEL, CONCRETE,

SIDEWALK (ALONG ROADS); WHEELCHAIR RAMPS

& FLUSH MEDIAN DELINEATION

DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, PAVEMENTSTRIPING

CONCRETE SLABS, COLUMNS, SIGNS, POSTS

RIGHT-OF-WAY, TEMP. & PERM. EASEMENTS

PERMANENT EASEMENT, PROPERTY PINS

PROPERTY LINES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT,

BLOCKS

ARROW, MATCH LINES, SEALING & SIGNING

BASE PLAN SHEET, SCALE BAR, NORTH

PROJECT NOTES

GRID AND LABELS; ELEVATION TICKS,

ETC. WT= 5, LC= 0

BASE PLAN SHEET, SCALE BAR, NORTH ARROW,

MATCH LINES, ETC. WT= 5, LC= 0

BASE PLAN SHEET, SCALE BAR, NORTH ARROW,

(LC= 1, WT= 1)

PHASE II - EXISTING CONTOURS

SWM BASIN ITEMS (BASIN, RISERS, WEIRS, ETC.)

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

UNDERDRAINS (CD-1 & 2, UD-1, UD-2, ETC.)

SPECIAL DESIGN ITEMS (ENDWALLS, INLETS, ETC.)

(EC-2, EC-3, ETC.)(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL DITCH ITEMS

(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

(TFB, TSF, TURB. CURTAIN)

PHASE II - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

(LC= 1, WT= 1)

PHASE I - EXISTING CONTOURS

DROP INLETS DI-1, DI-5 AND DI-9 SERIES (CELLS)

(EC-2, EC-3, ETC.)(CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL DITCH ITEMS

(TFB, TSF, TURB. CURTAIN) (CUSTOM LINE STYLE)

PHASE I - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS

CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES, MANHOLES

PROPOSED UNDERGROUND SIGNAL EQUIPMENT

SIGNAL HEADS, PEDESTRIAN PUSHBUTTONS, ETC.

SIGNS ON SPANWIRE, MAST ARMS, POLES,

PROPOSED ABOVE GROUND MINOR SIGNAL EQUIPMENT

PHASING DIAGRAM, PREEMPTION DIAGRAM, TIMING CHART

SIGNAL CHARTS COLOR SEQUENCE CHART,

CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES, DUCT CABLE

EXISTING UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT -- LIGHTING

ELECTRICAL SERVICE, ARMS

(INCLUDING UNDER BRIDGE), POLES, CONTROL CENTER,

EXISTING ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT -- LIGHTING LUMINAIRES

PUSHBUTTONS, CONTROLLER/CABINET&FOUNDATION, ETC.

POLE, MAST ARM, SPAN WIRE, SIGNAL HEADS, PEDESTRIAN

EXISTING ABOVE GROUND MINOR SIGNAL EQUIPMENT

DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, DIRECTIONAL ARROW TEXT

LOCATION INFORMATION ROADWAY NAMES, BASELINE NAME,

FOUNDATION, UTILITY POLES

PF-3 MAST ARM, SPAN WIRE, CONTROLLER/ CABINET &

MAST ARM, COMBO MAST ARM, STRAIN, COMBO STRAIN, PF-2,

PROP. ABOVE GROUND MAJOR SIGNAL EQUIPMENT POLE -

& FOUNDATION, UTILITY POLES

PF-2, PF-3 MAST ARM, SPAN WIRE, CONTROLLER/ CABINET

POLE - MAST ARM, COMBO MAST ARM, STRAIN, COMBO STRAIN,

EXIST. ABOVE GROUND MAJOR SIGNAL EQUIPMENT

FACES, PROPOSED SIGN LEADERS

PROPOSED SIGN FACES & LEADERS, PROPOSED SIGN

SIGNING WORKING LEVEL

LAYOUTS, SIGNAL WORKING LEVEL, LIGHTING WORKING LEVEL,

SIGNAL DESIGNER WORKING LEVEL PAVEMENT MARKING

VDOT LOGO, CONSULTANT LOGO

MATCHLINES, BORDER, STANDARD BORDER TEXT,

SHEET INFORMATION NORTH ARROW, SCALE BAR,

1F

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANSACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

1F

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001f.dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:42:34 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 48: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALE

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

2A(1)

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

Varies 2.5’ - 8’

2.5’

SEE INSET B

SEE INSET B

NOT TO SCALE

INSET A

NOT TO SCALE

INSET B

Exist. Crown Pt.

13

Prop. Crown Pt.BL

Varies

1

46

8

8

SEE INSET A

SEE INSET A

MEDIAN BARRIER BUMPOUT DETAIL

SIGN STRUCTURE

VARIES 140’ - 280’

STA 115+77.64 TO STA 123+27.00

OLD DOMINION DRIVE

STA 123+27.00 TO STA 123+62.49

NOT TO SCALE

FULL DEPTH PATCH/ JOINT REPAIR

Ex. Joint

6’

4.5’

Sawcut (PCC only)

Full Depth

3

1 2 392’

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

10

MECHANICAL ANCHORS

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING FINISHED GRADEEXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER

3 IN. MAX*

MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*

32"

BARRIER MODIFICATION

MECHANICAL ANCHORS

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING FINISHED GRADEEXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER

3 IN. MAX*

MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*

32"

MECHANICAL ANCHORS

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER3 IN. MAX*

MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*

ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 1 BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 2 BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS SINGLE BARRIER FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS DOUBLE BARRIER FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS BIFURCATED

full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement

Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing

High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane

Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"

with 4% hydraulic cement by weight

Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed

Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5 (PG 76-22)

Ex. 16’ clr.

Pro

p. 16’ min. clr.

See Note 8St’d GS-11

St’d GS-11

See Note 8

1.50% - 2.00%

1.50% - 2.00%

9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER

NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE

9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER

NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE

9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER

NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE

9’ - 12’

12’

PROP. GR-2

LONGITUDINAL TAPER RATE OF 26:1.

2. BARRIER MODIFICATIONS SHALL HAVE A

1. BARRIER GLARE SHIELDS SHALL BE REPLACED.

NOTES:

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA

4"-5" Ex. Asphalt 4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA

USE LANE.

THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER

SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION

9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET

SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.

WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE

8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION

OF 10 LB/SY.

CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE

0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL

COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF

7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED

6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.

CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.

TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING

5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH

AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.

4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT

FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.

3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY

2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.

REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.

1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,

NOTES:

**

**

** See Note 9

** See Note 9

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

2A(1)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513002a(1).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:03:28 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 49: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALE

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

SHOULDER USE LANE

2A(2)

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANEVaries 2.5’ - 4.5’

5’ - 12’

SEE INSET B

SEE INSET A

STA 123+62.49 TO STA 125+89.30

SCOTTS RUN BRIDGESTA 125+89.30 TO STA 128+07.45

2’

PROP. UD-4

NOT TO SCALE

INSET A

NOT TO SCALE

INSET B

Exist. Crown Pt.

13

Prop. Crown Pt.BL

Varies

1

46

8

8

NOT TO SCALE

FULL DEPTH PATCH/ JOINT REPAIR

6’

4.5’

Sawcut (PCC only)

Full Depth

3

1 2 39 10

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

2" MILLING AND OVERLAY

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A

SEE INSET B

2’

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

L

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE

B

SHOULDER USE LANE

STA 128+07.45 TO STA 148+50.00

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’2.5’

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement

Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing

High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane

Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"

with 4% hydraulic cement by weight

Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed

Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5 (PG 76-22)

MATCH EXISTING

TRANSITION LENGTH

NOT TO SCALE

PAVEMENT TIE-IN

13

4" MIN.

8EXISTING PAVEMENT

TIE INTO EXISTING

See Note 8St’d GS-11

St’d GS-11

600

1

1.50% - 2.00%

See Note 8 1.50% - 2.00%

3.5’

See

3.5’

5’-6’

6’-9’

Ex. Joint4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA

4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA

Note 10

**

**

IMPACTED DUE TO PAVEMENT BUILDUP.

10. MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER. EXISTING EXPANSION JOINT TO BE REPLACED WHERE

USE LANE.

THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER

SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION

9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET

SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.

WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE

8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION

OF 10 LB/SY.

CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE

0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL

COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF

7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED

6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.

CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.

TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING

5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH

AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.

4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT

FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.

3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY

2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.

REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.

1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,

NOTES:

** See Note 9

** See Note 9

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

CONTACT POINTS WITH THE PAVEMENT SURFACE SHALL NOT EXCEED �".

SPECIFICATIONS. THE VARIATION FROM THE TESTING EDGE OF THE STRAIGHT EDGE BETWEEN ANY TWO

STRAIGHT EDGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 315.07(A) OF THE

SPECIFICATION EXCEPT THAT ALL JOINTS AT TIE-IN LOCATIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED USING A 10-FOOT

2. PAVEMENT TIE-IN SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 315.05(C) OF THE

PROJECT. TRANSITION LENGTH SHALL BE 150’ MINIMUM.

AND EXISTING PAVEMENT AT SCOTTS RUN BRIDGE, AT RAMP TIE-INS AND AT THE BEGINNING/END OF

1. PAVEMENT TIE-IN SHALL BE USED TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN PAVEMENT OVERLAY

NOTES:

2A(2)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513002a(2).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:05:30 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 50: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

TYPICAL SECTIONS

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

NOT TO SCALE

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

2A(3)

2.5’

SEE INSET DSEE INSET A

12’

SHOULDER

STA 155+00 TO 163+50

STA 158+00 TO 162+00

GEORGETOWN PIKESTA 164+52.40 TO STA 165+26.00

2’

NOT TO SCALE

INSET A

NOT TO SCALE

INSET B

Exist. Crown Pt.

13

Prop. Crown Pt.BL

Varies

1

46

6

8

NOT TO SCALE

6’

4.5’

Sawcut (PCC only)

Full Depth

3

1 23

9 10

NOT TO SCALE

1

578

3 10

JOINT REPAIR

FULL DEPTH PATCH/ INSET D

TRANSITION LENGTH

NOT TO SCALE

1

EXISTING PAVEMENT

ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’2.5’

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A

SHOULDER USE LANE

SEE INSET C

STA 148+50.00 TO STA 164+52.40

2’

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

I-495 NORTHBOUND

NOT TO SCALE

INSET C

1

578

3 10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement

Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing

High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane

Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"

with 4% hydraulic cement by weight

Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed

Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5 (PG 76-22)

EXISTING ELEVATION

Transition Detail

MILLING (4" MIN.) PROPOSED ELEVATIONAT GEORGETOWN PIKE

MILLING (5" MIN.)

13

TO OBTAIN MIN. 16’-0" CLEARANCEONLY REQ’D AT GEORGETOWN PIKE BRIDGE

Ex. 15’-9" clr.

Pro

p. 16’ min. clr.

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

See Note 8 St’d GS-11

St’d GS-11

St’d GS-11

St’d GS-11See Note 8

600

3% - 4.18% Super

4.18% Super

ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

4’-24’

24’ WIDE SHOULDER

2’-4’

Ex. Joint4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA6" Ex. CTA

9" Ex. PCC

4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

USE LANE.

THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER

SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION

9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET

SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.

WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE

8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION

OF 10 LB/SY.

CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE

0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL

COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF

7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED

6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.

CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.

TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING

5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH

AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.

4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT

FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.

3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY

2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.

REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.

1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,

NOTES:

**

** See Note 9

** See Note 9

**

Temp. Const. Barrier from Survey

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS2A(3)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513002a(3).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:09:46 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 51: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALE

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’4.6’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

2A(4)

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’2.5’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A

SHOULDER USE LANE

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’2.5’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

SEE INSET C

SEE INSET B

SEE INSET A

SEE INSET A

SHOULDER

11’

AUX. LANE SHOULDER

SEE INSET B

11’

AUX. LANE SHOULDER

STA 165+26.00 TO STA 172+00.00

LIVE OAK DRIVESTA 186+38.50 TO STA 186+70.58

STA 186+70.58 TO STA 211+81.74

2’

2’

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

NOT TO SCALE

INSET A

NOT TO SCALE

INSET B

Exist. Crown Pt.

13

Prop. Crown Pt.BL

Varies

1

46

6

8

NOT TO SCALE

6’

4.5’

Sawcut (PCC only)

Full Depth

3

1 2

3

9

10

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

L

11’ 11’ 12’ 12’ 11’ 11’2.5’

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A

SHOULDER USE LANE

SEE INSET B

AUX. LANE SHOULDER

STA 172+00.00 TO STA 186+38.50

PROP. UD-4

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

NOT TO SCALE

INSET C

1

578

3 10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement

Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing

High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane

Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"

with 4% hydraulic cement by weight

Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed

Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5 (PG 76-22)

1.50% - 2.00%

1.50% - 2.00%

1.50% - 2.00%

PROP. UD-4

See Note 8 St’d GS-11

St’d GS-11

St’d GS-11

St’d GS-11

See Note 8

See Note 8

See Note 8

1.50% - 2.00%

8’-12’

8’-12’

9.5’

8’-11’

Ex. Joint4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA6" Ex. CTA

4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

9" Ex. PCC

**

**

**

**

** See Note 9

** See Note 9

** See Note 9

** See Note 9

JOINT REPAIR

FULL DEPTH PATCH/

ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER USE LANE.

HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5%

LATERAL OFFSET SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE

9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE

MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.

SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN

SUPERELEVATION WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF

8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE

B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 10 LB/SY.

OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING

APPLIED AT A RATE OF 0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE

STABILIZED COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2

7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT

6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.

FOR SEALING CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.

WITH TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS

5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED

SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.

OF PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL

4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH

CORRECTION.

3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY FOR SLOPE

DESIGN.

2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT

PLAN SHEETS.

1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT, REFER TO

NOTES:

2A(4)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513002a(4).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:11:01 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 52: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Mile

Marker

E

TT

TCTC

TC

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

PT 117

+82.3

1

118

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513003.dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:49:59 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 118

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 4

3

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

C1

C1

STA. 115+75.00

BEGIN PROJECT 0495-029-123 P101, C501

I-495 NORTHBOUND

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

T = 891.27’

L = 1,782.31’

R = 46,043.27’

100+00.00PC =

PT = 117+82.31

PI = 108+91.27

Curve NBB001

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#

E = MATCH EXISTING

V = 70 MPH

150’ MIN.

SEE NOTE 3

EN

D

PA

V’T

TIE-I

N

BE

GIN P

AV’T

TIE-I

N

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

4. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

SHEET 2A(2).

3. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETIAL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

3

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

SS 10

0+0

0.0

0

=

03°02’5

2" Lt.

PI 105+9

8.6

8

279. 10’ Rt.

+11. 33

MONF 235. 97’ Rt.

+64. 66

MONF

64

64-a

(a)

(b)

64-b

64-c

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

24

24-a

Inv. Out = 242. 37’

In Pl. 6" Plastic Pipe

In Pl. U. D.

25

63

63-a

25-a

64-d

65

64-e

Soundwall

Face Of

Soundwall

Face OfExist. R/W & L/A Line

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway Survey Baseline

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan 0

413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Page 53: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Gate

Scotts R

un

Brush

Scotts

Run

Metal Guardrail

Conc. Jersey Wall

Scotts

Run

285

294

296

S

TCTC

TC

C

D S

Lig

ht

Pole

Lig

ht

Pole

EOI

EOI

EOI

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

PT 117

+82.3

1

118 119 12

0 121 122 123

PC 12

3+2

6.3

3

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513004.dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:12:21 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 118

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 3

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 132

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 5

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

4

I-495 NORTHBOUND

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

OL

D

DO

MINIO

N

RO

AD

C2

C2 Curve NBB002

PI = 131+87.79

T = 861.46’

L = 1,704.54’

R = 4,770.00’

123+26.33PC =

PT = 140+30.87

PROPOSED MB-7DPROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 122+36.40 TO STA. 123+65.87

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 130+30.36 TO STA. 131+69.96

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

37 14 19

23

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.23%

V = 70 MPH

MODIFY EXISTING BARRIERST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

150’ MIN.

BE

GIN P

AV’T

TIE-I

N

EN

D

PA

V’T

TIE-I

N

EN

D

PA

V’T

TIE-I

N

BE

GIN P

AV’T

TIE-I

N

SEE NOTE 4SEE NOTE 4

150’ MIN.

PROPOSED GR-2

PROP GR-FOA-2

PROPOSED GR-FOA-2

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACE AT A LOCATION

SHEET 2A(2).

4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

SURVEY.

3. THE OLD DOMINION BRIDGE SHOWN FROM SUPPLEMENTAL

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

4

111

112

113 11

4 115 11

6 117 11

8 119

120

121

122

123

124

=

00°5

7’4

3"

Rt.

PI 112

+44.0

2

=

06°02’18"

Rt.

PI 118

+87.2

6

78. 12’ Lt.+58. 22IPF

77. 93.’ Lt.+55. 43MONF

212. 35’ Rt.

+8. 54

MONF

233. 69’ Rt.

+89. 75

MONF

469. 19’ Rt.+23. 97MONF

439. 36’ Rt.+3. 20

MONF

26

26-a

27-a

62

62-a

27-B

Inv. Out = 233. 63’In Pl. 6" Plastic PipeIn Pl. U. D.

28

28-d

28-c28-b

28-a

293

294

296

295

298

297

1175

1174

1173

28-e

Conc. Ditch

SoundwallFace Of

SoundwallFace Of

SoundwallFace Of

Per V

DOT

Highw

ay

Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT Hi

ghway Plan

0413-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per V

DO

T

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist.

R/

W

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan 0

413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per

VDOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist.

R/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Page 54: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

O/

H

Sig

n

Brush

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)

DeckDeck Rip-Rap

Asphalt Shoulder

Metal Guardra

il

Reflector

Reflector

Woven Wire Fence

132 13

3 134 13

5

136

137

138

139

140

PT 14

0+3

0.8

7

141

142

143

144

145

146

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513005.dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:13:14 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 146+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 6

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 13

2+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 4

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

5

C2

C2

I-495 NORTHBOUND

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

Curve NBB002

PI = 131+87.79

T = 861.46’

L = 1,704.54’

R = 4,770.00’

123+26.33PC =

PT = 140+30.87

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 139+30.37 TO STA. 140+70.18

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

37

4448

58

62

63

75

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.23%

V = 70 MPH

MODIFY EXISTING BARRIER

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

5

125

126

127 12

8 129 13

0 131 13

2

133

134

135

136

137

138

=

07°5

6’3

9" Rt.

PI 126+3

1.34 =

03°05’3

3"

Rt.

PI 132

+23.11

=

00°50’4

0"

Rt.

PI 137+6

5.0

8

74. 50’ Lt.

+97. 26

IPF

74. 56’ Lt.

+87. 81

MONF

230. 31’ Rt.

+41. 90

IPF223. 98’ Rt.+7. 74

IPF

216. 43’ Rt.+30. 22IPF

1172

1462

1183

1182

1181

(a)

(b)

1178

1179

1180

1177

1176

1188

1189

29

29-a

23

23-a

1185-a

1185-b

1186

1187

(a)

(b)

Per VDOT Highway Plan

0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A L

ine

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Page 55: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

E

E

TC

TC

T

TC

T

F. O.

HH

TC

O/

H

Sig

n

U/C

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)

Paved Parking

Paved ParkingPaved Parking

Balls Hill Road - VA Route 686

Ramp

Brush

Asphalt Shoulder

Conc. Jersey

Wall

Mile

Marker

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sig

n

Grass

Brush

Gravel Shoulder

Reflector

1425

146

147

148

PC 14

8+7

1.61

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156 157 15

8 159 16

0

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513006.dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:54:23 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 146+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 5

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 16

0+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 7

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

6

C3

C3

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND

Curve NBB003

PI = 160+34.88

T = 1,163.27’

L = 2,283.06’

R = 4,830.00’

148+71.61PC =

PT = 171+54.66

WIDE SHOULDER AREA

APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOR

PROPOSED MB-7D

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 153+26.78 TO STA. 154+70.75

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 158+31.24 TO STA. 159+70.67

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

91

117

122

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.18%

V = 70 MPH

15’

98

BE

GIN P

AV’T

TIE-I

N

SEE NOTE 3

150’ MIN.

EN

D

PA

V’T

TIE-I

N

ZONE

BARRIER FOR WORK

TEMPORARY CONCRETESEE NOTE 4

PRIOR TO WORK ZONE

OF EXISTING SHOULDER

APPROXIMATE LOCATIONZONE

BARRIER FOR WORK

TEMPORARY CONCRETE

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

OF CONSTRUCTION.

4. FINAL FULL DEPTH SHOULDER WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED AT TIME

SHEET 2A(2).

3. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

6

139

140

141

142

143

144 14

5 146 14

7 148 14

9 150 15

1

152

=

06°44’2

6" Lt.

PI 143

+63.3

9

=

08°18

’37" Lt.

PI 151+24.6

7

60. 24’ Lt.+51. 57MONF

243. 84 Rt.+84. 347MONF237. 02’ Rt.

+61. 02

IPF

244. 30’ Rt.+94. 95MONF

1184 30

30-a

31-a

31

1190

1191

1192

1193

32

32-a

1194

1195

19

18

17

15

21

20

16

1

14

1424

1423

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

Soundwall

Face Of

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT High

way Plan 0

413-02

9-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/W

& L/

A Lin

e

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway P

lan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-02

9-007, R

W-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/

W

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Page 56: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Conc.

Sound Ba

rrier Wal

l

Ramp

Ramp

Ramp

Asphalt Shoulder

Asphalt

Asphalt

Conc. Jersey Wall

Sig

n Reflector

Sign

Sign

Sign

(2) Signs

Sign

Reflector

Sign

Sign

Reflector

Sig

n

Buildings

Maint.

Signs

Sig

nSig

n

Asphalt

SignSi

gn

Sig

n

Gravel Shoulder

CG-2

CG-2

Gravel S

hould

er

Stone Column

Sign

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

T

TC

E

TC

Traf.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Cab.

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Box

Traf. Sig

nal

Elec.

HH

Hydrant

EOI

EOI

EOI

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Traf.

Cab.

Utility Pole

EOI

w/

Traf.

Cab.

Utility Pole

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170 171

PT 17

1+54.6

6

172 17

3 174

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513007.dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:55:29 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 17

4+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 8

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 160+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 6

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

7

C3

C3

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

I-495 NORTHBOUND

GE

OR

GE

TO

WN PIK

E (R

TE 19

3)

Curve NBB003

PI = 160+34.88

T = 1,163.27’

L = 2,283.06’

R = 4,830.00’

148+71.61PC =

PT = 171+54.66

WIDE SHOULDER AREA

APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOR

PROPOSED MB-7DPROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 163+26.92 TO STA. 164+72.22

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 169+26.37 TO STA. 170+70.96

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

133

142 146151

160

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 4.18%

V = 70 MPH

8.5’

ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

150’ MIN.

SEE NOTE 4

EN

D

PA

V’T

TIE-I

N

ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

SHEET 2A(2).

4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

SURVEY.

3. THE GEORGETOWN PIKE BRIDGE IS SHOWN FROM SUPPLEMENTAL

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

7

153

154

155

156

157

158 15

9 160

161

162

163

164

165

166

=

09°5

7’2

4" Lt.

PI 157+5

7.9

7

=

03°4

7’0

0" Lt.

PI 165+4

2.3

3

151. 85’ Lt.+33. 06MONF

204. 29’ Lt.+51. 27MONF200. 45’ Lt.

+91. 06

MONF

1196-a

1196

1197-a

1197-b

2

3

1200-a

1200

12011202

1427

(a)

(b)

Soundwall

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0

413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Li

ne

Per V

DO

T

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. L

/A

Lin

e

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist.

R/

W

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

Per VDOT Highway P

lan 0413-029-

007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT

Highw

ay Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

Page 57: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Live Oak Drive

Balls Hill Road - VA Route 686

Asphalt Shoulder

EE

V

EOI

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

(DATUR)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513008.dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:00:03 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

174

175

176

177

178

PC 17

8+4

8.5

4

179

180 18

1 182

183

184

185

186

187

188

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 16

7+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 7

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 188+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 9

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

8

C4

C4

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

I-495 NORTHBOUND

LIV

E

OA

K

DRIV

E

Curve NBB004

PI = 186+04.22

T = 755.68’

L = 1,439.16’

R = 1,910.00’

178+48.54PC =

PT = 192+87.70

PROPOSED MB-7D

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 177+31.00 TO STA. 178+70.50

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 184+59.78 TO STA. 187+49.91

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

166

179

171

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 7.95%

V = 70 MPH

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 181+30.35 TO STA. 182+71.03

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

ST’D BPPS-1 REQ’D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

150’ MIN.

SEE NOTE 4

BE

GIN P

AV’T

TIE-I

N

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

8

167

168

169

170

171

172

173 17

4

175

176

177

178

179

180

= 15

°57’0

1" Rt.

PI 173+17.4

2

=

13°29’5

6"

Rt.

PI 177+7

2.7

2

47. 12’

Lt.+65. 34

MONF

56. 70’

Lt.+83. 51

MONF

1427

1204

1203

1206

1205-a

1205-b

40-b

40-a

39-b

41-a

41-b

101

102

100

4

61

60

103

104

105

106

107

42-a

42-b

1204-a

154155

105-a

Conc. Ditch

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Soundwall

Soundwall

Soundwall

Soundwall

Face Of

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-0

29-007, RW-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A Li

ne

Per V

DOT High

way Plan 0

413-02

9-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line The

Limited

Access Line In T

his

Area.

Unclear

As T

o The

Locatio

n Of

The

Existin

g Hi

ghwa

y Plans

Are

Per

VDOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/W

Line

Per VDOT

Highway Pla

n 0413-

029-007

, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

Page 58: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Live Oak Drive

Paved Parking

Paved Parking

Live Oak Drive

Ramp

Sound Barrier

Wall

Metal Guardrail

Metal Guardrail

E

E

E

TC

TC

TCTC

TC

TC

TC

Lig

ht

Pole

Elec.

Cab.

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Cab.

(DATUR)

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513009.dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:00:30 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

188

189

190 19

1 192

PT 19

2+8

7.7

0

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 18

8+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 8

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

02

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 10

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

9

C4

C4

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

I-495 NORTHBOUND

Curve NBB004

PI = 186+04.22

T = 755.68’

L = 1,439.16’

R = 1,910.00’

178+48.54PC =

PT = 192+87.70

218

228236

241

250

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 7.95%

V = 70 MPH

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 188+71.24 TO STA. 190+11.05

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

9

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

=

14°22’5

7" Rt.

PI 182+7

1.51

=

01°19’2

1" Rt.

PI 190+4

8.6

8

116. 73’ Lt.

+23. 49

IPF

42-b

110

108

58

111

112

43-a

43-b

113

114

115

116

118

119

120

121

57

122

123

124

44-a

44-b

5 6

125126

129

128

117-a

117-b

261. 52’ Rt.+68.

24MONF

259. 87’ Rt.

+41. 94

MONF

(a)

(b)

Conc. Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Sou

ndwall

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway

Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

Line

Per VDOT

Highway Pla

n 0413-

029-007

, RW-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e Per VDOT H

ighway Plan

0413-029-0

07, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT H

ighway Pla

n 0413-029

-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/

A Line

Page 59: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

E

E

E

E E

E

E

E

E

E

T

EE

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Meter

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

E

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

Dense Trees

O/

H

Sig

n

Cellular

Antenna

Crash

Barrier

George W

ashington Mem

orial Parkw

ay

Sound Barrier Wall

Ramp

Metal Guardrail

Metal Guardrail

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513010.dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:01:37 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

PC 211+8

2.4

2

212

213 214

215

216

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

02

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 9

10

C5

C5

I-495 SOUTHBOUND I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

I-495 NORTHBOUND

GE

OR

GE

WASHIN

GTON

ME

MORIA

L PAR

KW

AY

PC =

PT =

STA. 211+82.42

END PROJECT 0495-029-123 P101,C501

270287

298

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = MATCH EXISTING

V = 70 MPH

150’ MIN.

SEE NOTE 4

EN

D

PA

V’T

TIE-I

N

BE

GIN P

AV’T

TIE-I

N

Curve NBB005

PI = 221+05.40

T = 922.98’

L = 1,724.11’

R = 1,950.00’

211+82.42

229+06.54

BE

GIN P

AV’T

TIE-I

N

EN

D

PA

V’T

TIE-I

N

150’ MIN.SEE NOTE 4

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

SHEET 2A(2).

4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

FROM SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY.

3. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY BRIDGE IS SHOWN

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

10

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

=

00°28’5

0" Lt.

PI 195+8

3.3

0

=

18°42’3

2"

Rt.

PI 2

01+95.6

5

= 28°56’5

1" Lt.

PI 2

07+8

5.8

9

128

45-a

45-b

7 8

131130

132

133

910

11

12

11-a135

136137

56 55

138

139140

46-a

46-b

141

142

143

144

47

48

291. 87’ Rt.

+34. 42

MONF

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(a)(b)

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. DitchConc. Ditch

Conc. D

itch

Conc. DitchConc. Ditch

Soundwall

Soundwall

Face Of

Page 60: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001.dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:25:51 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

DHV

V (MPH)

REVISED

STATE LINE

CITY,TOWN OR VILLAGERIGHT OF WAY LINEFENCE LINEUNFENCED PROPERTY LINEFENCED PROPERTY LINEWATER LINESANITARY SEWER LINEGAS LINEELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLETRAVELED WAYGUARD RAILRETAINING WALLRAILROADSBASE OR SURVEY LINE

LEVEE OR EMBANKMENTBRIDGESCULVERTSDROP INLETPOWER POLESTELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH POLESTELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH LINESHEDGETREESHEAVY WOODSGROUND ELEVATIONGRADE ELEVATION

CONVENTIONAL SIGNS

30

30

+50

DATUM LINE

DATUM LINE

173

175

T/Tg

E

6" W

8" S

4" G

PLPL

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PLAN AND PROFILE OF PROPOSED

STATE HIGHWAY

SCALE

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND TRAFFIC DATA

D (%) (design hour)

T (%) (design hour)

WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED.

THE ORIGINAL APPROVED TITLE SHEET(S), INCLUDING ORIGINAL

SIGNATURES, ARE FILED IN THE VDOT CENTRAL OFFICE PLAN LIBRARY.

ANY MISUSE OF ELECTRONIC FILES, INCLUDING SCANNED SIGNATURES,

IS ILLEGAL AND ENFORCED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW.

ALL CURVES ARE TO BE SUPERELEVATED, TRANSITIONED AND

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION

AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT.

THIS PROJECT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

STATE

PROJECT

NO.

SECTIONEQUALITIES

FEET

LENGTH INCLUDINGFEDERAL AID

PROJECT NO.FEET FEETMILES MILES

LENGTH EXCLUDINGTYPE

PROJECTDESCRIPTIONBRIDGE(S) BRIDGE(S)TYPE

CODE

UPC

NO.

BRIDGE

PROJECT

NO.

Project Lengths are based on Construction Baseline.

AND BRIDGE STANDARDS, 2009 MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENT TO

AMENDED BY CONTRACT PROVISIONS AND THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC

PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY.

THE MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL AND AS

DEPARTMENT’S 2007 ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS, 2008 ROAD

COUNTY LINE

SIGNATURES AND THE OFFICIAL PLAN ASSEMBLY IN ELECTRONIC

AS AWARDED, HAS BEEN SEALED AND SIGNED USING DIGITAL

FORMAT IS STORED IN THE VDOT CENTRAL OFFICE PLAN LIBRARY,

INCLUDING ALL SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS, WILL BE THE OFFICIAL

CONSTRUCTION PLANS. FOR INFORMATION RELATIVE TO ELECTRONIC

FILES AND LAYERED PLANS, SEE THE GENERAL NOTES.

THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY

GEOPAK Computer Identification No. 105130

DESIGN PACKAGE (GEOPAK).

THIS PROJECT WAS DEVELOPED UTILIZING THE DEPARTMENT’S ENGINEERING

800’0’ 1600’

FAIRFAX COUNTY

70 MPH

Fairfax County Population 1,109,725 (2012 Census)

INTERSTATE 495

TO MARYLA

ND

TO TYSONS CORNER

S

TA. 2

11+8

2.4

2E

ND

PR

OJE

CT

WIDENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD TC 5.11R, EXCEPT

GW

PA

RK

WA

Y

VIRGINIA

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Copyright 2014, Commonwealth of Virginia

FOR INDEX OF SHEETS SEE SHEET 1B

S

TA. 115

+75.0

0B

EGIN P

ROJE

CT

I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE PROJECT

P101, C501PROJECT #0495-029-123

P-101

C-501

PENGSTP-495-5(094)

STP-495-5(094)

105130

105130F000

1.82 1.82 PRELIM. ENG.

CONSTRUCTION1.82 1.82

--- ---

--- ---

FHWA 534 DATA 4A144

ADT (2013)

04

95-029-123

FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DRIVE

FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DR

FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DR

FR: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DRIVE

TO: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY

TO: GW MEMORIAL PARKWAY

TO: GW MEMORIAL PARKWAY

TO: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY

RIGHT OF WAY

PERFORMED WITHIN EXISTING

ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE

Sta. to Sta. Approval DateReasons for Exception

Sta. to Sta. Shoulder Width Approval DateReasons for Exception

Sta. to Sta. Approval DateReasons for Exception

Sta. 122+00 to Sta. 207+00

Sta. 122+00 to Sta. 207+00

Sta. 150+00 to

Sta. 207+00

ADT (2035)

100%

4.3%

TIER 2 PROJECT

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION

APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION

APPROVED

DATE

DATE

DATE

DATE

DATE DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STATE LOCATION AND DESIGN ENGINEER

PROGRAMMING DIVISION DIRECTOR

CHIEF ENGINEER

DATE STATE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE ENGINEER

CHIEF OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING

during Peak HoursShoulder Use Lane

DESIGN EXCEPTIONS TO INTERSTATE 495

100 110 12

0

130

140

150

160

170 18

0

190

200

210

220

PC

PT

PC

GE

OR

GE

TO

WN PIK

E

OL

D

DO

MIN

ON

DRIV

E

PT P

C

PT

PC

PT

PC

PT

I-495 NORTHBOUND (GS-5) - LEVEL

REDUCED NORTHBOUND LANE AND SHOULDER WIDTHS

INSIDE SHOULDER WIDTH SOUTHBOUND AT SIGN STRUCTURES

USE, OUTSIDE AND AUXILIARY LANES

HORIZONTAL SIGHT DISTANCE NORTHBOUND INSIDE SHOULDER

Widths

Barrier modification forsign structures

Varies 6’-8’

Varies 0.5’-12’Provide width for

Shoulder Use Lane

Sight Distance

495’ & 645’

109,000 (ONE WAY)

177,400 (ONE WAY)

11,000 (ONE WAY)

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

1

Page 61: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

LOCATION MAPFAIRFAX COUNTY

0

SCALE

880’ 1760’

1A

1A

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001a.dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:28:32 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 62: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

TITLE SHEET

PLAN SHEETS

1

TYPICAL SECTIONS

SURVEY ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET

CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET

DESCRIPTIONSHEET NO. STATIONS

1A LOCATION MAP

1B INDEX OF SHEETS

CADD LEVEL STRUCTURE SHEET

1BINDEX OF SHEETS

1D

3-10

1E(1) - 1E(5)

1F

2A

104+00 to 216+00

12(1) - 12(11) SIGNING PLANS

1B

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001b.dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:30:43 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 63: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

SURVEY ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1D

1D

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001d.dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:32:41 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

To Convert Va. State Plane Coordinates NAD 83 Metric Values to Va. D. O. T. Project Coordinates.

Reduce the Eastings 2. 5 Million Meters and the South and North Zone Northings by 1 and 2 Million Respectively.

Multiply by the U. S. Survey Foot (3. 28083333333) .

Multiply These Values by the Combined Scale and Elevation Factor ( 1. 00006 ) for this County.

A Reverse of this Procedure will Transform VDOT Project Coordinates to NAD 83 Values.

SS 466,998.7713 3,649,265.7743100+00.00

PI 467,527.6104 3,649,546.4007105+98.68

PI 468,112.9335 3,649,818.1577112+44.02

PI 468,691.6486 3,650,098.9594118+87.26

PI 469,323.2010 3,650,492.3972126+31.34

PI 469,777.4178 3,650,871.7212132+23.11

PI 470,174.0557 3,651,241.0525137+65.08

PI 470,605.8755 3,651,655.1931143+63.39

PI 471,213.3587 3,652,113.9988151+24.67

PI 471,768.5812 3,652,418.6271157+57.97

PI 472,511.1143 3,652,671.3366165+42.33

PI 473,259.7521 3,652,872.0979173+17.42

PI 473,650.1754 3,653,106.3356177+72.72

PI 474,006.1774 3,653,455.7015182+71.51

PI 474,408.2711 3,654,120.7729190+48.68

PI 474,674.2367 3,654,584.5329195+83.30

PI 474,983.3218 3,655,113.1578201+95.65

PI 475,102.0647 3,655,691.3254207+85.89

PI 475,398.9838 3,656,038.3180212+42.58

PI 476,227.1529 3,656,269.7243221+02.47

SURVEY ALIGNMENTS

POINT STATION BEARING PROJECT COORDINATES

NORTH (Y) EAST (X) ELEV. (Z) ID.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway - Survey Baseline

272. 47’

252. 07’

243. 81’

243. 64’

262. 07’

278. 42’

291. 77’

303. 30’

300. 87’

294. 74’

285. 07’

278. 73’

267. 88’

258. 62’

234. 19’

221. 87’

207. 63’

198. 19’

186. 50’

152. 75’

Page 64: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

0

SCALE

100’ 200’

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 13

0+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(2)

CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(1)

C1

C2

C2C1

STA. 115+75.00

BEGIN PROJECT 0495-029-123, P101, C501

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB001

PI = 108+91.27

T = 891.27’

L = 1,782.31’

R = 46,043.27’

100+00.00PC =

PT = 117+82.31

Curve NBB002

PI = 131+87.79

T = 861.46’

L = 1,704.54’

R = 4,770.00’

123+26.33PC =

PT = 140+30.87

E = MATCH EXISTING E = 4.23%

V = 70 MPH

PC 10

0+0

0.0

0

100

105

110

115

PT 117

+82.3

1

120

PC 12

3+2

6.3

3

125

130

1E(1)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001e(1).dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:34:41 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 65: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

0

SCALE

100’ 200’

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 130+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(1)

CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(2)

C2

C2

C3

C3

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 16

0+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(3)LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB002

PI = 131+87.79

T = 861.46’

L = 1,704.54’

R = 4,770.00’

123+26.33PC =

PT = 140+30.87

Curve NBB003

PI = 160+34.88

T = 1,163.27’

L = 2,283.06’

R = 4,830.00’

148+71.61PC =

PT = 171+54.66

E = 4.23% E = 4.18%

V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH

130

135

140

PT 14

0+3

0.8

7

145

PC 14

8+7

1.61

150

155

160

1E(2)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001e(2).dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:35:46 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 66: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

0

SCALE

100’ 200’

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 190+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(4)

CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(3)

C3MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 16

0+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(2)

C3 C4

C4

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB003

PI = 160+34.88

T = 1,163.27’

L = 2,283.06’

R = 4,830.00’

148+71.61PC =

PT = 171+54.66

Curve NBB004

PI = 186+04.22

T = 755.68’

L = 1,439.16’

R = 1,910.00’

178+48.54PC =

PT = 192+87.70

E = 4.18% E = 7.95%

V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH

160

165

170

PT 17

1+54.6

6

175

PC 17

8+4

8.5

4

180

185

190

1E(3)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001e(3).dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:37:39 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 67: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

0

SCALE

100’ 200’

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 190+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(3)

CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(4)

C4

C5

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

20+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(5)

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB004

PI = 186+04.22

T = 755.68’

L = 1,439.16’

R = 1,910.00’

178+48.54PC =

PT = 192+87.70

Curve NBB005

PI = 221+05.40

T = 922.98’

L = 1,724.11’

R = 1,950.00’

211+82.42PC =

PT = 229+06.54

C4

C5

STA. 211+82.42

END PROJECT 0495-029-123, P101, C501

E = MATCH EXISTINGE = 7.95%

V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH

190

PT 19

2+8

7.70

195

200

205

210

PC 211+8

2.42

215

220

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS1E(4)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001e(4).dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:38:39 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 68: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

0

SCALE

100’ 200’

CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT DATA SHEET1E(5)

C5

C5

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

20+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(4)

C5

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB005

T = 922.98’

L = 1,724.11’

R = 1,950.00’

211+82.42PC =

PT = 229+06.54

E = MATCH EXISTING

V = 70 MPH

PI = 221+05.40

C4

C3

C2

C1

I-495 NORTHBOUND CONSTRUCTION BASELINE

220

225

PT 229+0

6.5

4

Ending chain 495REV2 description =============================================================================== Chord Bear = N 34° 53’ 12.82" E Ahead = N 9° 33’ 27.14" E Back = N 60° 12’ 58.50" E C.C. N 476,706.88 E 3,654,476.66 P.T. Station 229+06.54 N 476,383.10 E 3,656,399.60 P.C. Station 211+82.42 N 475,014.46 E 3,655,445.28 Mid. Ord. = 187.47 Long Chord = 1,668.50 External = 207.41 Radius = 1,950.00 Length = 1,724.11 Tangent = 922.98 Degree = 2° 56’ 17.68" Delta = 50° 39’ 31.36" (LT) P.I. Station 221+05.40 N 475,472.93 E 3,656,246.35 Curve NBBO05 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO04 to PC NBBO05 N 60° 12’ 58.50" E Dist 1,894.72 Chord Bear = N 38° 37’ 49.58" E Ahead = N 60° 12’ 58.50" E Back = N 17° 02’ 40.66" E C.C. N 472,415.60 E 3,654,749.59 P.T. Station 192+87.70 N 474,073.30 E 3,653,800.84 P.C. Station 178+48.54 N 472,975.45 E 3,652,923.49 Mid. Ord. = 133.95 Long Chord = 1,405.36 External = 144.06 Radius = 1,910.00 Length = 1,439.16 Tangent = 755.68 Degree = 2° 59’ 59.20" Delta = 43° 10’ 17.84" (RT) P.I. Station 186+04.22 N 473,697.93 E 3,653,144.99 Curve NBBO04 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO03 to PC NBBO04 N 17° 02’ 40.66" E Dist 693.88 Chord Bear = N 30° 35’ 09.55" E Ahead = N 17° 02’ 40.66" E Back = N 44° 07’ 38.43" E C.C. N 473,727.80 E 3,648,102.25 P.T. Station 171+54.66 N 472,312.05 E 3,652,720.10 P.C. Station 148+71.61 N 470,364.89 E 3,651,569.20 Mid. Ord. = 134.27 Long Chord = 2,261.86 External = 138.11 Radius = 4,830.00 Length = 2,283.06 Tangent = 1,163.27 Degree = 1° 11’ 10.49" Delta = 27° 04’ 57.77" (LT) P.I. Station 160+34.88 N 471,199.88 E 3,652,379.13 Curve NBBO03 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO02 to PC NBBO03 N 44° 07’ 38.43" E Dist 840.73 Chord Bear = N 33° 53’ 24.43" E Ahead = N 44° 07’ 38.43" E Back = N 23° 39’ 10.44" E C.C. N 466,440.28 E 3,654,407.71 P.T. Station 140+30.87 N 469,761.41 E 3,650,983.83 P.C. Station 123+26.33 N 468,353.98 E 3,650,038.42 Mid. Ord. = 75.94 Long Chord = 1,695.49 External = 77.17 Radius = 4,770.00 Length = 1,704.54 Tangent = 861.46 Degree = 1° 12’ 04.21" Delta = 20° 28’ 27.99" (RT) P.I. Station 131+87.79 N 469,143.06 E 3,650,384.04 Curve NBBO02 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO01 to PC NBBO02 N 23° 39’ 10.44" E Dist 544.02 Chord Bear = N 22° 32’ 38.24" E Ahead = N 23° 39’ 10.44" E Back = N 21° 26’ 06.04" E C.C. N 449,383.33 E 3,691,995.46 P.T. Station 117+82.31 N 467,855.66 E 3,649,820.17 P.C. Station 100+00.00 N 466,209.64 E 3,649,136.88 Mid. Ord. = 8.62 Long Chord = 1,782.20 External = 8.63 Radius = 46,043.27 Length = 1,782.31 Tangent = 891.27 Degree = 0° 07’ 27.98" Delta = 2° 13’ 04.40" (RT) P.I. Station 108+91.27 N 467,039.26 E 3,649,462.59 Curve NBBO01 *----------* Curve Data =============================================================================== Beginning chain 495REV2 description

1E(5)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513001e(5).dgn

Plotted By: localuser1:41:33 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

Page 69: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

RCell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(1).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:26:53 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

E

E

PROPOSED EXISTING

PLAN SYMBOL

CCTV CAMERA SITE

ITS LEGEND

OR VDOT OWNED)

TRAFFIC DETECTOR SITE (EXPRESS LANESE V

MONITORING SYSTEMFIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SHOULDER LANE 0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(1)

(1) PTZ ON CELLULAR TOWER

CCTV-1045:

PROPOSED EXISTING

Proposed Sign Panel

Existing Sign to Remain or to be Relocated

95

I NTERSTATE

Existing Sign to be Removed

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

SE

E

SH

EE

T 11(2)

SIGNS SUPPORTS

SIGN & ITS SUPPORT LEGEND

SYMBOL

Single Post Sign/ITS Support

Double Post Sign/ITS Support

O/H Cantilever Sign/ITS Support

O/H Span Sign/ITS Support

O/H Butterfly Sign/ITS Support

SIGN/ITS NOTES:

- (2) DETECTORS

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - OL:

- (1) DETECTOR

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - IL:

AND DO NOT GUARANTEE ANY LEVEL OF COVERAGE.

CAMERA LOCATIONS AND QUANTITY SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY

REQUIREMENTS OF THE RFP AND SPECIFICATIONS. SLMS CCTV

ENSURE THAT THE COVERAGE AND DETECTION MEETS THE

LOCATIONS OF THE FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR THE SLMS TO

THE DESIGN BUILDER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE

SHOULDER LANE TAPER AT THE NORTH END OF THE PROJECT).

THE SOUTH END OF THE PROJECT TO THE END OF THE

OF THE SHOULDER USE LANE (FROM THE THEORETICAL GORE AT

FOR OBSTRUCTION AND INCIDENT DETECTION ALONG THE LENGTH

3. A SHOULDER LANE MONITORING SYSTEM (SLMS) SHALL BE PROVIDED

ANY LEVEL OF COVERAGE.

LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND DO NOT GUARANTEE

PROJECT LIMITS DURING ALL SEASONAL CONDITIONS. CCTV CAMERA

AND ALL LANE USE CONTROL SIGNALS AND DMSs WITHIN THE

CCTV CAMERA VIEWING COVERAGE OF I-495 NB AND SB TRAFFIC

2. THE DESIGN BUILDER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING 100%

SIGNING AND ITS REQUIREMENTS.

INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS (PART 2 OF THE RFP) FOR ALL

THE DESIGN-BUILDER SHALL REFER TO THE RFP TECHNICAL

1. PROPOSED SIGN/ITS STRUCTURES AND LOCATIONS ARE CONCEPTUAL.

- (1) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH - HOT)

- (2) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH - GP)

- (1) FIXED (POINTING NORTH)

- (1) PTZ

CCTV - 1059 (EXPRESS LANES):

Proposed Shoulder Lane Control Signal (LCS)

95

I NTERSTATE

95

I NTERSTATE

11(1)

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)

Paved P

arking

Gate

Asphalt Shoulder

Lewinsville Road -

VA

Route 694

Conc. Island

Asphalt

Conc. Slope Control Wall

Exist. FAA R/W

Exist. VDOT R/W & L/A Line

Exist. FAA R/W

Exist. FAA R/W

Exist. L/A LineL/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

C43

R=2

5.0

0’

A=3

8.3

4’

Exist. FAA R/W

Exist. FAA R/W

Exist. F

AA R/

W

Exist. FAA R/W

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

End L/A Line

End L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Comp

72.04’

+55.26

Exist. VDOT R/W & L/A Line

US Mon. Fd.225.8

7’+49.22

RM-1 Fd.228.07’+08.20

Comp152.99’+17.46 RM-1 Fd.

130.41’

+28.04

RM-1 Fd.122.32’

+61.45

Comp

166.41’

+61.59

IPF

60.0

7’

+92.2

3

US Mon. Fd.

135.17’

+20.80 Co

mp

79.5

7’

+77.5

2

Co

mp

55.5

2’

+02.5

3

Comp

167.75’

+41.84

Exist.

R/

W

IPF

188.71’

+09.33

RM-1 Fd.

139.82’

+92.61Comp

140.08’

+89.23

Comp

23.34’

+66.29

LE

WIN

SVIL

LE

RD

(Rte. 6

94)

TYP

E 1 D

MS

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 EXPRESS (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 EXPRESS (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

Page 70: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

R

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(2).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:28:12 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

E

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(2)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

SE

E

SH

EE

T 11(1)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 114

+50 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(3)

- (2) DETECTORS

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - IL:

11(2)

PC 10

0+0

0.0

0

100

101

102

103

104

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

OVE

RL

AY

SIG

N P

AN

EL

Page 71: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(3).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:33:54 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(3)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 119

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(4)

PAVEMENT MARKINGS

TIE INTO EXISTING

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 114

+50 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(2)

FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMS

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTHTYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

(45 DEGREES)

TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH

11(3)

E

TT

TCTC

TC

64

64-a

(a)

(b)

64-b

64-c

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

24

24-a

Inv. Out = 242. 37’

In Pl. 6" Plastic Pipe

In Pl. U. D.

25

63

63-a

25-a

64-d

65

64-e

Soundwall

Face Of

Soundwall

Face OfExist. R/W & L/A Line

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan 0

413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)

Asphalt Shoulder

Asphalt Shoulder

Asphalt Shoulder

Asphalt Shoulder

Mile

Marker

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

RM-1 Fd.

123.82’

+36.49

RM-1 Fd.**

114.95’

+34.96

NOT HELD for Right-of Way Purposes

Note: " ** " Denotes Existing Monumentation

RM-1 Fd.

123.76’

+82.30

276

277

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

PT 117

+82.3

1

118

119

(SH

OU

LD

ER

CL

OS

ED)

ME

SS

AG

E 1

(SH

OU

LD

ER

OP

EN)

ME

SS

AG

E 2

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

B

D

C

A

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

(2) T

YP

E 3

DM

S

J

Page 72: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(4).dgn

Plotted By: localuser3:04:24 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

E

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(4)

- (1) PTZ ON CELLULAR TOWER

CCTV - 1050:

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 119

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(3)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 132

+50 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(5)

PROPOSED CCTV-1

- (1) DETECTOR

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES):

FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTHTYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

REMOVE EXISTING SIGN AND LIGHTING

- (1) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH)

- (1) FIXED (POINTING NORTH)

- (1) PTZ

CCTV - 1061 (EXPRESS LANES):

(45 DEGREES)

TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH

11(4)

S

S

S

S

S

S

Solar Panel

(2)

Elec.

Boxes

Elec. Trans.

Power S

witch

Cellular Ante

nna

Elec.

Boxes

Power Pole

26

26-a

27-a

62

62-a

27-B

Inv. Out = 233. 63’In Pl. 6" Plastic PipeIn Pl. U. D.

28

28-d

28-c28-b

28-a

293

296

295

298

297

1172

1175

1174

1173

28-e

Conc. Ditch

SoundwallFace Of

SoundwallFace Of

SoundwallFace Of

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan 0

413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Gate

Brush

Brush

Scotts

Run

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Oute

r Loop)

Asphalt Shoulder

Asphalt Shoulder

Asphalt Shoulder

Asphalt Shoulder

Conc. Jersey Wall

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

End L/A Line

End L/A Line

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line End L/A Lin

e

Exist.

R/W

& L/

A Line

Comp123.41’+31.44

Co

mp

85.6

9’

+26.0

6

RM-1 Fd.336.62’+65.19

IPF

87.14’

+24.3

7

RM-1 Fd.123.75’+40.80

RM-1 Fd.

147.49’

+46.35RM-1 Fd.

126.74’

+66.47

294

296

1172

S

TCTC

TC

C

D S

EOI

EOI

EOI

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

119 12

0 121 122 123

PC 12

3+2

6.3

3

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

OL

D

DO

MINIO

N

DR

(Rte. 7

38)

OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBLB

D

C

A

B

A

C

A

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

Page 73: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(5).dgn

Plotted By: localuser3:05:43 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(5)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 146+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(6)

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 132

+50 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(4)

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

(45 DEGREES)

TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH

11(5)

74. 50’ Lt.

+97. 26

IPF

74. 56’ Lt.

+87. 81

MONF

230. 31’ Rt.

+41. 90

IPF223. 98’ Rt.+7. 74

IPF

1462

1183

1182

1181

(a)

(b)

1178

1179

1180

1177

1176

1188

1189

29

29-a

23

23-a

1185-a

1185-b

1186

1187

(a)

(b)

(Variable Width R. O. W.)S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan

0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A L

ine

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

S

S

140

O/

H

Sig

n

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)

Deck Rip-Rap

Asphalt Shoulder

Reflector

Reflector

Woven Wire Fence

R=4924.65’ A=155

6.22’

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A L

ine

R=4624.65’ A=892.

86’

C44Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

RM-1 Fd.

127.00’

+57.66

IRF

126.85’

+83.80

R=4624.65’ A=176.01’

Comp

126.85’

+28.51

IRF

126.82’

+61.32

1172

TC

TC

S

S

TC

TC

TC

A

B

133 13

4 135

136

137

138

139

140

PT 14

0+3

0.8

7

141

142

143

144

145

146

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

B

A

C

A

B

A

C

A F

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

Page 74: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(6).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:43:51 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

V

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(6)

FIBER CONNECTION.

HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH

- (1) DETECTOR

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2506 IL:

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 146+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(5)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 160+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(7)

PROPOSED CCTV-2

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

(45 DEGREES)

TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH

PAVEMENT MARKINGS

TIE INTO EXISTING

REMOVE EXISTING SIGN

11(6)

Soundwall

Face Of

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT High

way Plan 0

413-02

9-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/W

& L/

A Lin

e

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway P

lan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-02

9-007, R

W-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e

Elec.

Box

Elec.

Box

Elec.

Box

Solar Panel

E E E

O/

H

Sig

nI-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)

Ramp

Asphalt Shoulder

Conc. Jersey

Wall

Sig

n

Sig

n

Grass

Gravel Shoulder

R=4624.65’ A=807.43’

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

R=1518.

01’ A

=544.4

5’

Exist. R/W

& L/

A Lin

e

R=4924.65’ A=476.63’

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

C45

R=4924.65’ A=10.79’)

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Exist. L/A Line

RM-1 Fd.62.3

4’+38.2

7

1425

E

E

TC

TC

T

TC

T

F. O.

HH

TC

146

147

148

PC 14

8+7

1.61

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156 157 15

8 159 16

0

OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

B

A

C

FA

B

AC

F

A

E

EA

E

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

A

J

J

Page 75: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(7).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:45:39 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

V

V

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(7)

- (1) DETECTOR

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2503 OL:

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 160+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(6)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 174+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(8)

PROPOSED CCTV-3

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTHTYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

REMOVE EXISTING SIGN AND LIGHTING

(45 DEGREES)

TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH

PAVEMENT MARKINGS

TIE INTO EXISTING

TOWER

CELLULAR

- (1) PTZ ON

CCTV - 1055:

- (2) DETECTORS

IDS 2504 IL, IDS 2505 IL:

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR -

11(7)

151. 85’ Lt.+33. 06MONF

204. 29’ Lt.+51. 27MONF

1196-a

1196

1197-a

1197-b

2

3

1200-a

1200

12011202

1427

(a)

(b)

Soundwall

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0

413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Li

ne

Per V

DO

T

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. L

/A

Lin

e

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist.

R/

W

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

Per VDOT Highway P

lan 0413-029-

007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT

Highw

ay Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

Cellular TowerT

Tele. Ped

.

H

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

Sound Ba

rrier Wal

l

Ramp

Ramp

Ramp

Conc. Jersey Wall

Buildings

Maint.

CG-2

CG-2R=1518.01’ A=544.45’

Exist. R/W & L/A Li

ne

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Exist.

R/

W

&

L/

A Lin

e

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

N 14°30’33" E

571.99’Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Exist. L/

A

Lin

e

RM-1 Fd.

83.53’

+46.84RM-1 Fd.

61.74’

+47.28

RM-1 Fd.

62.36’

+33.96

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

T

TC

E

TC

Hydrant

EOI

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170 171

PT 17

1+54.6

6

172 17

3 174

GE

OR

GE

TO

WN PIK

E(Rte. 193)

OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

B

A

C

A

A

C

A

B

A

E

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

Page 76: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(8).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:46:42 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(8)

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 167+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(7)

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 188+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(9)

PROPOSED CCTV-4

FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMSFIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

SIGN AND LIGHTING

REMOVE EXISTING

(45 DEGREES)

TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

11(8)

47. 12’

Lt.+65. 34

MONF

56. 70’

Lt.+83. 51

MONF

1427

1204

1203

1206

1205-a

1205-b

40-b

40-a

39-b

41-a

41-b

101

102

100

61

60

103

104

105

106

107

42-a

42-b

1204-a

154155

105-a

258. 26

’ Rt.+26

. 35IPF

363. 86’ Rt.

+89. 02

PPF

Conc. Ditch

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Soundwall

Soundwall

Soundwall

Soundwall

Face Of

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-0

29-007, RW-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A Li

ne

Per V

DOT High

way Plan 0

413-02

9-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line The

Limited

Access Line In T

his

Area.

Unclear

As T

o The

Locatio

n Of

The

Existin

g Hi

ghwa

y Plans

Are

Per

VDOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/W

Line

Per VDOT

Highway Pla

n 0413-

029-007

, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

Live Oak Drive

Balls Hill Road - VA Route 686

Asphalt Shoulder

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

N 16°57’19"

E 281.98

N 14°30

’33" E

571.99’

Exist. R/

W & L/A

Line

RM-1 Fd.42.3

0’+84.8

1

EE

V

EOI

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

(DATUR)

174

175

176

177

178

PC 17

8+4

8.5

4

179

180 18

1 182

183

184

185

186

187

188

LIV

E

OA

K

DR

(SH

OU

LD

ER

CL

OS

ED)

ME

SS

AG

E 1

(SH

OU

LD

ER

OP

EN)

ME

SS

AG

E 2

TYP

E 2

DM

S

OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495

(CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL B

ELTWAY) NBL

AC

A

B

G

B

A

C

A

G

E

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

Page 77: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(9).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:52:15 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

V

V

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(9)

POWER AND PROVIDE FIBER CONNECTION.

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH HARDWIRED

- (2) DETECTORS

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2501 SB, IDS 2502 SB:

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 188+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(8)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

02

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(10)

PROPOSED CCTV-5

(SEE SHEET NO. 11(10))

TO GEORGE WASHINGTON PARKWAY

BETWEEN I-495 NORTHBOUND AND RAMP

- RELOCATE DETECTOR TO GORE AREA

STRUCTURE

- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2523 NB:

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

(45 DEGREES)

TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

11(9)

286. 91’ Lt.

+8. 52

MONF

116. 73’ Lt.

+23. 49

IPF

42-b

110

109

59

108

58

111

112

43-a

43-b

113

114

115

116

118

119

120

121

57

122

123

124

44-a

44-b

5 6

125126

127

129

128

117-a

117-b

261. 52’ Rt.+68.

24MONF

259. 87’ Rt.

+41. 94

MONF

(a)

(b)

Conc. Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Sou

ndwall

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway

Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

Line

Per VDOT

Highway Pla

n 0413-

029-007

, RW-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e Per VDOT H

ighway Plan

0413-029-0

07, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT H

ighway Pla

n 0413-029

-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/

A Line

Trans.

Live Oak Drive

Live Oak Drive

Ramp

Sound Barrier

Wall

Dense Trees

Metal Guardrail

Metal Guardrail

E

E

E

TC

TC

TCTC

TC

TC

TC

Lig

ht

Pole

Elec.

Cab.

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Cab.

(DATUR)

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

188

189

190 19

1 192

PT 19

2+8

7.7

0

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

TYP

E 1 D

MS

CA

G

A

B

C

F

G

A

B

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

F

Page 78: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(10).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:56:17 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

V

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(10)

AND PROVIDE FIBER CONNECTION.

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH HARDWIRED POWER

SIGN STRUCTURE (SEE SHEET NO. 11(9))

- (1) DETECTOR RELOCATED FROM OVERHEAD

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2523 NB:

CELLULAR TOWER

- (1) PTZ ON

CCTV - 1070:

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

02

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(9)

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

16+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(11)

CELLULAR TOWER

(1) PTZ ON

CCTV - 1060:

PAVEMENT MARKINGS

TIE INTO EXISTING

PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND

(10’ LINE, 30’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(2’ LINE, 4’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 8" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

(3’ LINE, 9’ SPACE)

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 12" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 6" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, YELLOW PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

TYPE B, CLASS VI, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 4" WIDTH

(45 DEGREES)

TYPE B, CLASS I, WHITE PAVEMENT LINE MARKING, 24" WIDTH

PAVEMENT MARKINGS

TIE INTO EXISTING

11(10)

45-a

45-b

7 8

131130

132

133

910

11

12

11-a

134

135

136137

56 55

138

139140

46-a

46-b

141

142

143

144

47

48

291. 87’ Rt.

+34. 42

MONF

423. 86’ Rt.

+80. 38

MONF

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(a)(b)

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. DitchConc. Ditch

Conc. D

itch

Conc. DitchConc. Ditch

Soundwall

Soundwall

Face Of

Dense Trees

O/

H

Sig

n

Cellular

Antenna

O/

H

Sig

n

Cellular

Antenna

George W

ashington Mem

orial Parkw

ay

Deck

Deck

Sound Barrier Wall

Ramp

Metal Guardrail

Metal Guardrail

E

E

E

E E

E

E

E

E

E

T

EE

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Meter

Tele.

HH

Elec.

HH

E

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

PC 211+8

2.4

2

212

213 214

215

216

GE

OR

GE

WASHIN

GTON

ME

MORIA

L PK

WY

(Rte. 9

0005)

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

C

EG

A

B

C

A

B

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

E A

I

H

H

I

A

E

J

J

Page 79: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513012(11).dgn

Plotted By: localuser2:57:38 PM

3/7/2014

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

EXHIBIT

The LANE Team

ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY.

OFCONSTRUCTION OR THE

TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE

AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT

THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

V

V

0

SCALE

50’ 100’

11(11)

FIBER CONNECTION.

HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH

STRUCTURE

- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2520 OL:

FIBER CONNECTION.

HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH

STRUCTURE

- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2500 IL:

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

16+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 11(10)

PROPOSED CCTV-6

LANE CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT DESIGN PLANS

11(11)

266. 85’ Rt.

+42. 58

(U.S.G.S.)

MONF232. 0

8’ Rt.+67. 77(U.S.G.S

.)MONF

201. 71’ Rt.

+81. 84IPF

215. 75’ Rt.

+90. 63MONFConc. Ditch

Conc. Ditc

h

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Conc. Ditch

SoundwallFace Of

(Variable Width R. O

. W.)S. B. L.Interstate

495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O

. W.)N. B. L.Interstate

495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT H

ighway P

lan 0413-0

29-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A Li

ne

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-0

29-007, RW-2

Exist.

R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-0

29-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Lin

e

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W Line

Per V

DO

T

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. L

/A

Lin

e

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W Line

O/

H

Sig

n

Conc.

E

E

E

T

TC

TC

T

TV

Elec.

HH

Traf.

HH

Elec.

HH

TV

TC

EOI

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226 227 2

28

229

PT 229+0

6.5

4

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

Page 80: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

Attachment 4.2.8Offeror’s Technical Proposal Compliance

Page 81: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

4.2.8 Technical Proposal Compliance

I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use State Project No.: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501 Federal Project No.: STP-495-5(094) Contract ID Number: C00105130DB72

The Lane Construction Corporation’s Technical Proposal is fully compliant with the Design Criteria Table included in the RFP Technical Requirements (Part 2) as Attachment 2.2 and all other requirements of this RFP. The Lane Construction Corporation certifies the proposed limits of construction to include all stormwater management facilities are located within the right-of-way limits shown on the RFP Conceptual Plans with the exception of permanent and temporary easements. The Lane Construction Corporation’s design concept does not require Design Exceptions and/or Design Waivers unless they are identified or included in the RFP or Addendum(s).

Page 82: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

14500 Avion ParkwaySuite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151703.222.5670

www.laneconstruct.com

Page 83: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

PRICE PROPOSAL

I-495 NORTHERN SECTION

SHOULDER USEState Project No.: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501

Federal Project No.: STP-495-5(094)Contract ID No.: C00105130DB72

Submitted by:

March 14, 2014

Submitted for:

ORIGINAL

Page 84: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 85: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 86: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 87: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 88: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 89: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 90: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 91: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 92: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 93: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 94: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 95: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 96: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 97: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 98: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 99: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 100: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 101: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 102: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 103: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 104: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 105: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 106: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 107: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 108: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 109: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 110: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 111: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 112: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 113: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 114: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 115: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 116: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 117: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS
Page 118: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE · 3/14/2014  · ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use in Fairfax County, Virginia LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

14500 Avion ParkwaySuite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151703.222.5670

www.laneconstruct.com