i hydrogeological investigation i · adjusted to a ph of 11 or greater, followed by three serial...
TRANSCRIPT
36
I1^
Results of, . .iI Hydrogeological InvestigationI| for . . .
I ____• ^^^^TF" Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co
Battle Creek, Michigan
I
1
November, 1983• Project 20225
I
I
I EDI ENGINEERING & SCIENCE• cMftiKiciTQQ / rspni rvsiSTc i aim oniCTQ / rt-iPUMT.Q
II 0000743
ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS / BIOLOGISTS / CHEMISTS611 CASCADE W. PKWY, S.E , GRAND RAPtOS. Ml 49506 1616)942-0970
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTIONBackgroundScope of thisLocationMethods
Study
RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONGeologyGroundwater Flow ConditionsGroundwater Qual HySoil Quality
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
APPENDICES
A - Methods for Observation Well Construction and Sample Collection
11122
55610
B - Construction Records for Wells
FIGURES
12
34
56789101112
TABLES
1234567
General Location MapPlan of Study Area Showing Location of Wells andSoil SamplesConfiguration of the Bedrock SurfaceCross Section Showing Relationship between GlacialDrift and BedrockWater Table Configuration, August, 1982Groundwater Flow Direction, September, 1983Probable Distribution of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ofofofof
ProbableProbableProbableProbableProbable
DistributionDistributionDistributionDistributionDistribution of
1,1-DichloroethyleneTetrachloroethylene1.1-DichloroethaneTrichloroethylene1.2-Dichloroethane
Follows Page
2
in pocket6
9131313131313
Groundwater Elevation Measurements, September 2, 1983Results of In Situ Permeability TestsResults of Volatile Organic Compound Analyses of Groundwater 12Base Neutral Fraction Compounds Detected in On-Site Wells 13Results of DNR Analysis of Soil Samples from Well 1 14Description of Soil Sampling SitesResults of Chemical Analysis of Soils
911
1618
0000744
I
I4
i• i4
*ii
INTRODUCTION
Background
Contaminated water wells in and near the Verona well field were discovered bythe Michigan Department of Public Health in September 1981. Subsequentinvestigations by the State of Michigan and USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protec-tion Agency) showed that numerous organic compounds, principally volatilehalogenated organic compounds, had impacted groundwater in both the glacialdrift and bedrock aquifers. The highest concentrations were found in an areanorth of Emmett Street and west of the Grand Trunk Western Railroad (GTW).
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Michigan Department ofNatural Resources suggested that three local firms might be potential sourcesof the lost chemicals. The MDNR, and later the USEPA, under the authority ofthe Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and LiabilityAct of 1980, requested these firms to voluntarily initiate investigations todetermine whether or not they were a source of contamination and if remedialmeasures were necessary. [n cooperation with those requests, the GTWconducted a study in July 1982 to evaluate a localized groundwater contamina-tion incident near their heavy repair shop where a solvent leak had beendiscovered and subsequently repaired. The investigation summarized in thisreport expands upon the July, 1982 study and also examines soil quality on GTWproperty closer to the Verona well field.
Studies conducted by other agencies are proceeding more or less concurrentlywith the GTW investigation. These include studies by the U.S. GeologicalSurvey for the City of Battle Creek and a study by CH0M H i l l for the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.
Scope of this Study
Field work for this study phase was conducted during July, August andSeptember of 1983 and was limited to property owned by the Grand Trunk WesternRailroad. The objectives of the study were to:
-1- 0000745
0r 1. Refine knowledge of the vertical and horizontal extent of groundwater
contamination in the glacial drift aquifer near the Heavy Repair Shop.
2. Verify the direction of groundwater flow in both the g l a c i a l drift andbedrock aquifers near the repair shop.
3. Evaluate the hydraulic connection between the drift and bedrock aquifersat the shop.
4. Expand upon knowledge of groundwater quality near the old round house.
5. Evaluate the quality of soils near the old roundhouse and the marshallingyard.
Location
The area included in this study is in the eastern portion of the Battle Creekmetropolitan area and occupies portions of Section 5, Emmett Township (T2S,R7W) and Section 32 and 33, Pennfield Township (T1S, R7W). Emphasis wasplaced on the narrow zone along the railroad tracks extending from the heavyrepair shop northward through the marshalling yard. Figure 1 shows thelocations of important features in this area.
The study area is a flat terrace which separates ml ling h i l l s to the eastfrom the Battle Creek River and its floodplain to the west. Surface drainageon the terrace has been highly modified by storm sewers and artificialditches.
Methods
The principal data collection activities during this study phase and theearlier phase involved construction of exploration borings and observationwells, collection of soil and water samples for chemical analysis, measurementof water levels and determination of in situ permeability. Each of thesetasks was supervised by, or conducted by. Environmental Data Inc. (EDI) staff.
000074ft-2-
•I
1VERONA
1 WELL
FIELO*
&
^ i
1
Jt\f
.
(,
^
$
f
^
?
***** sr
! > ^OLD ROUND HOUSE
»
J
?
5rt£>> "^vT *
^
i
i >,
iN
0 1000 2000 3000i r —— ™ —— i iSCALE IN FEET
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMPANY
SEPT 1983 20325
0000747
iIIIIcI
—r*
1
I
i
I
4
Iai4
Two d r i l l i n g methods were used for exploration borings and well construction.The sha Mow glacial drift holes were constructed using a hoi low stem augermachine. Deep bedrock holes were constructed using hydraulic rotary methodsto bedrock and air rotary methods through the bedrock. Considerable care wasexercised to prevent contamination of the aquifer by dirty equipment or fromchemicals in soils or groundwater above the aquifer. Appendix A describes themethods used in more detail. Figure 2 shows the locations of the we! Isconstructed for this study and other wells of interest.
Observation wells constructed for this study have been numbered sequentially(e.g. 1 through 9). Wel Is with a number and no letter suffix are theshallowest wells in a well cluster. The wells are referred to °itner by theterminology used by the U.S. Geological Survey (i.e. G-l for Grand TrunkWestern we!Is) or without the letter prefix. The prefix "GT" is used todesignate production wells owned by Grand Trunk Western. The numbering ofwells constructed by others conforms to the system used by the U.S. GeologicalSurvey (e.g, T-13 is the 13th wel 1 constructed by the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency "TAT" investigation contractor).
Almost all of the water samples collected during this phase were obtained witha Kemmerer type sampling device after five casing volumes of water had beenpurged with a centrifugal pump. The sampling device was cleaned prior tosampling each well. Each sample was placed on ice immediately after collec-tion and the samples were delivered to EOI laboratories the same day.Appendix A contains a more complete description of the techniques used.
Soil samples were collected with a standard metal agricultural soil sampler.The sampler was washed with soapy water and rinsed with clean water betweeneach sampling. Two samples were collected at each site. One sample wasstored in a wide mouth glass bottle for laboratory evaluation with an organicvapor analyzer. The second sample was analyzed with gas chromatograph massspectrometer.
000074%-3-
II All volatile organic compounds were analyzed by the purge and trap gas
chromatographic/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) method as described in the USEPApublication "Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and IndustrialWastewater" (method No. 624). At the beginning of each day that analyses areperformed, the GC/MS system is checked to ensure that acceptable performancecriteria are achieved for bromofluorobenzene. Five m i l l i l i t e r sample aliquotswere purged for 22 minutes followed by 6 minutes of desorption onto a 1%SP-1000, 80/60 Carbopack B chromatographic column. The GC was programmed from60 to 215°C at a rate of !2°C/m1n to achieve effective separation of volatilecompounds. Solid sediment samples were analyzed as above, except the purgingchamber was immersed in a water bath held at 70°C to aid in transferringpurgeable organics onto the trap. The internal standard method of analysiswas employed for both solid and liquid samples.
All base-neutral compounds were detected and analyzed by the gas chromato-graphic/mass spectrometer EPA method #625, taken from the same USEPA pub-lication cited in the volatile procedure above. Mass spectrometer performancewas assured on each day of analysis by meeting the performance criteriarequired for decafluorotriphenyl phosphine. One liter volunes of sample wereadjusted to a pH of 11 or greater, followed by three serial extractions in aseparatory funnel with 100 ml. aliquots of methylene chloride. The extractswere combined and dried by pouring them through a column containing about 10cm. of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was then concentrated to a finalvolume of 2 mis. in a water bath adjusted to 60 to 65°C. Immediately beforeinjection, deuterated anthracene was added to each sample as an internalstandard. The samples were then injected onto a DB-5 fused silica capillarycolumn (30 m. x 0.25 mm) with the GC temperature programmed from 50 to 280°Cat a rate of 12° C/min. Base-neutral priority pollutant compounds weredetected and quantified from the data collected by the mass spectrometer.
The elevation of each observation well was determined using a self-levelinglevel. U.S. Geological Survey well number E-28 was used for a referencedatum. Survey circuit closure was within ±0.02 feet.
0000749-4-
Iii
3I
Ii1
Ii
Water level measurements were made using the chalked-steel tape method. Thesemeasurements were made on the same day as U.S. Geological Survey measurementsin other observation wells.
In situ permeabi1i ty measurements were made wi th a specia1ly constructedinstrument consisting of a float operated rheostat, vacuum or pressure pump,and a portable computer. This device allowed the measurement of water levelchanges of ±0.01 foot at 0.2 second intervals. Interpretation of test resultsrelied upon the method described by Schmid (1967).
RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION
Geology
Two types of geologic formations underlie the study area. The oldest forma-tion of interest is the Marshall Sandstone, which forms the bedrock. Overly-ing this sandstone bedrock are glacial deposits consisting of unconsolidatedsand, gravel and clay. Alluvial material is 1ikely present in the BattleCreek river floodplain located west of the study area, but the nature of thesedeposits has not been examined.
The Marshall Formation near the heavy repair shop is a fine to very finegrained, silty to clayey sandstone. Interbedded with the sandstone is darkgrey and black shale. North of the repair shop (e.g. near the old roundhouse) the sandstone is somewhat coarser gained. The sandstone strata of theMarshall Formation are an important aquifer in this area. The shale layersmay divide the sandstone formation into several distinct aquifers, but mostbedrock wells are open to more than one sandstone layer.
The sandstone and shale strata are inclined toward the north. The rate of dipis approximately 16 feet per mile (.003 feet per foot). This inclination ofthe bedrock formation means that an individual stratum would be about 24 feetdeeper at the Verona well field than it would be at the heavy repair shop.
0000750-5-
Bedrock fractures are an important feature since water w e l l s which intersectfractures are known to produce more water than w e l l s that do not intersectfractures. Well 8A was the only well constructed for t h i s st^dy that pene-trated an obvious fracture. The location or orientation of individualfractures cannot be predicted with the available information.
The bedrock surface is quite irregular and several buried bedrock valleys havebeen mapped by the U.S. Geological Survey. One of these valleys exists underthe Heavy Repair Shop. Material penetrated during the construction of recentwells suggests that this particular bedrock valley has been partly filled-inwith clay or clayey material. Figure 3 depicts the location of this valley.
Overlying the bedrock throughout the study area are glacial deposits. Thesedeposits range from well sorted material (e.g., clay, sand, gravel) to verypoorly sorted material (e.g. , sandy, si 1ty clay). In general , the materiallying directly on the bedrock near the heavy repair shop is clay or clayeymaterial, but near the old round house, bedrock is overlain by sand or saridand gravel. The sand or sand and gravel formations are high yielding aquiferswhere saturated.
The general relationship between glacial deposits and bedrock formations isshown in Figure 4.
The original land surface has been regraded throughout the study area. F i l lmaterial was encountered during the construction of several observation wellsto depths of about 15 feet.
Groundwater Flow Conditions
Local aquifers are recharged by precipitation which infiItrates the landsurface. Some of the water found in aquifers below GTW property may haveresulted from recharge taking place in the uplands more than one mile east.The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the average annual precipitationhere is 33 inches and that 8 to 12 inches of this total infiltrates andrecharges local aquifers.
Water level measurements made during this study and studies by the USGS showthat groundwater moves toward the Battle Creek River except for an area
-6- 000075!
SCALE IN FEET
NOTE; THIS FIGURE IS A MODIFICATION OF A MAPPRER6RED BY THE U.S.GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1982.THE DASHED LINES REPRESENT THE MODIFICATIONS.
t
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMFfcNY
SURFACE CONFIGURATION OF THEMARSHALL FORMATION
FIG. 3SEPT. 1983 20225
0000752
<' C «'
m m
c
!0
SOUTH
•90-
K-tOm PW
•30-
•M-
•lO -
•00-
7M-
770-
7tO-
790-
740-
730-
720-
1 TIO-
700-
WO —
K HEAVY *CMm SHOP j1
HORIZONTAL SCA
SKIMMim^^
^^^V^e G-3 a-i &* _____ Jj
/
/I-;:f,y,--
&&&&
\:::.:r.:-:i
\
\
^^^^. .•, . .'.-. ri • •• • •
:;:::;:;>:;>>:;:;:;x;:>
__ — -T
.
A4VP
SAND
Oft FILL
'8\m$!*>^Oft SAND
GLACIAL Win
•-•is
ma^ ^
—— ? —
GENERALIZED CROSS-SECTION SHOWING THEBETWEEN GLACIAL DRIFT AND BEDROCK
LE: lln* «OOft.
- i>4V/? SUfiFACZ
* r ————
^^-— 'S^^^
^^^
4A!9 £M4KA -a=AQUIFER
m-:::'-:--'-:--:-'-- :--^^^ TOP OFix^ BEDROCK AQUIFER
ss
-RELATIONSHIPFORMATION
E-*^^^
•^^Tv1
**-^^*
M61
3
*»
SM
SM
NORTHOLD
. HOUMO HOUSC .p n -MO
-2 T-*GT- ~ **°
- «20
^***^ - wo
-770
-760
1-74O
-750
— 720
-7|0
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMPANY
CROSS -SECTION
FIG. 4SEPT. 1983 2O225
.surrounding the Verona well field. Pumpage from the well field has created acone of depression which appears to divert the flow of groundwater as much as0.5 to 1 mile away from the well field. The regional flow pattern as itexisted in August 1982 is shown in Figure 5 which is reproduced from a USGSreport (USGS 1982, Fig. 3). Of special interest is the groundwater dividewhich extends approximately parallel to and just south of Emmett Street.Groundwater south of the divide flows westerly toward the river, but north ofthe divide the flow is toward the Verona well field. The position of thisdivide will change in response to changes in groundwater pumpage and precipi-tation.
Groundwater elevation measurements (see Table 1) made on September 2, 1983,confirm that groundwater flow in the glacial drift aquifer is westerly at theheavy repair shop and moves directly toward the Battle Creek River. Thegradient at this location is about 10 feet per mile (.002 feet per foot).Figure 6 illustrates the Inferred flow direction in the glacial drift aquifer.The flow in the sandstone bedrock aquifer is westerly to southwesterly at therepair shop with a gradient of 21 feet per mile (.004 feet per foot).
The water level measurements show that the water level elevation is differentin the bedrock aquifer compared to the glacial drift aquifer. A water leveldifference between two aquifers shows that there is a potential forgroundwater to flow from the aquifer having the higher water level to theaquifer having the lower water level. The bedrock aquifer water level isabove the glacial drift aquifer water level at some locations and below atothers.
From past measurements near the repair shop, it is anticipated that thevertical water level gradient and gradient direction may change with time, andany change w i l l be due to variations in local precipitation and pumpage. The
0000754
vertical gradient near the Verona well field is typically downward in responseto pumping from the Verona well field. This fact, coupled with the absence ofclayey material between the shallow glacial drift aquifer and the sandstonebedrock aquifer, means that groundwater can readily move downward into thebedrock aquifer. While movement between the two aquifers is possible at theVerona well field, this type of movement is greatly inhibited near the heavyrepair shop because of the clay which separates the two aquifers.
-8- 0000755
_ __ GROUNOWATER DIVIDE
NOTE : THIS FIGURE IS REPRODUCED FROM"GROUNDWATER FLOW AT VERONA WELL HELD
BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN" US GEOLOGICALSURVEY PROVISIONAL REPORT,1982 FIGURE 3.FAGE I3A
1000 3000 3000
SCALE IN FEET
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMRXNY
WATER TABLE CONFIGURATION, A'JG,82
FIG 5SEPT. 1983 20225
0000756
TABLE 1GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS
September 2, 1983
Aquifer andWell No.
Glacial Drift1
1AIB2
2A3
3A44A578
T-13
Bedrock1C5A67A8A9
9AT-16
TOCElevation
833.47834.18834.58836.43836.24834.94834.74935.06835.12827.95828.32835.30831.88(1)
833.64828.76829.69829.18834.11838.45838.89841.19 '
Water DepthBelow TOC
15.2015.9916.3617.6017.3316.8516.6717.1517.2510.6511.6417.3913.18
14.9610.456.7513.1615.7410.8911.3412.78
WaterElevation
818.27818.19818.22818.83818.91818.09818.07817.91817.87817.30816.68817.91818.70
818.68818.31822.94816.02818.37827.56827.55828.41
NOTE:TOC refers to "top of casing"(1) The measuring point used for these wells was the top of 2-inch
casing. The TOC elevation of T-16 determined in this study differsfrom previous reported elevation (841.19 vs 841.36).
0000757
' I;
- t
r.r0 1000_ 2000 3000I—————I—————I—————ISCALE IN FEET
0000758
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMPANY
DIRECTION OF GROUNOWATER FLOW IN THESHALUM GLACIAL DRIFT AQUIFER, 9/2/83
SEPT. 1983FIG 6
20225
*
pi
During the September 1983 water level measurement, the water level of the oilskimming pond was higher than adjacent groundwater by 1.28 feet. The waterlevel of the Battle Creek River oxbow west of the repair shop was 0.17 feetbelow the water level in Well No. 5.
One of the important aquifer characteristics which influences the rate atwhich water can move through an aquifer is permeability. Permeability (orhydraulic conductivity) is a measure of the ability of water to pass throughthe aquifer. Twelve in-situ permeability tests were performed during thisstudy to provide an estimate of the permeability of both the bedrock andglacial drift aquifers. The results of these tests, as summarized in Table 2,show that the glacial drift aquifer at the repair shop is considerably morepermeable than the underlying bedrock aquifer. However, the bedrock at well9-A is very permeable.
The average velocity of groundwater in the glacial drift aquifer at the repairshop can be estimated by the following relationship:
Where:v » average velocity
K = permeability (average 60.1 ft/day)
^ h » hydraulic gradient (0.002)
S a porosity (0.2)
With this relationship, the calculated average velocity is .6 feet per day.At this rate, a molecule of water would require over 360 days to migrate fromthe repair shop to the west side of the railroad tracks.
Groundwater Quality
A considerable number of water samples have been analyzed by government andprivate laboratories since the contamination problem was first discovered.These analyses have refined the understanding of the area impacted bycontamination and the types of contaminants. The principal contaminants
0000759-10-
TABLE 2RESULTS OF IN SITU PERMEABILITY TESTS
Aquifer andWell No.
Glacial Drift1-A2
3-A578
Bedrock(2)1-C5-A67-A8-A9-A
centimetersper second
0.0320.0050.0270.0080.034(1)
0.0040.00150.00030.0050.00020.228
Permeabilityfeet
per day
90.714.276.522.796.4(1)
11.34.38.514.2
6646
gal Ions per dayper square foot
678106572170721(1)
84.831.86.361064.244834
(!) The permeability of the zone screened in Well 8 is too low to measurewith the equipment available during this study,
(2) For this analysis, it was assumed that only the sandstone section of thebedrock wells yielded water and the shale sections were impermeable. Theaverage permeability of the entire thickness of the Marshall Formationwould be less than the values shown here.
0000760
-11-
SCALE IN FEETGROUNOWATER GCNCRAILY EXCCC09 < MICROGRAM/LlTERGROONOWATER OCNCRALLY EXCCCOS 10 MICROGRAMS/LITERGROUMOWATER GENERALLY EXCECOS 100 MICROGRAMS/LITER
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMPANY
PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OFI, I, I TRICHLOROETHANE
FIG .7SEPT. 1983 20223
THE DISTRIBUTION SHOWN HERE is O A S E O ONCHEMICAL A N A L Y S I S PERFORMED f-ROM OCIOBtn, JOOlTHnOUGH S C P T C M U P R I9B3
0000761
' I
*• t . I "
LEGEND
toGROUNOWATER SCNCRALLY EXCCIOS I MICftOORAM/LlTCNGROUNOWATER SCNERALLY EXCEEDS 10 UICR06RAMS/ LITER(3ROUNOWATER OENERALLY EXCEED* '00 MICROGRAM3/ LITER
NOTETM? 3S*S ieU~ :ON SHOWN MERE IS 3iSED O'J
Ci^ A. ' , i_rSES P^^^CfiMEO '^CM 3CT03E9,-QH S£P*£MaEH .963 (lt)00762
0 1000 ZOOO 3000I———I———I———ISCALE IN FEET
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMF&NY
PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OF1,1- PICHLOROETHOTENE
FIG. 8SEPT. 1963 20323
found are in a class described as volatile chlorinated organic compounds.These compounds are primarily used as solvents for fats, waxes, oils andgreases.
Early information on the area near the heavy repair shop suggested thatcontamination was principally restricted to the shallow glacial drift aquiferbecause of the clay material which separates the shallow sand and gravelaquifer from the sandstone bedrock aquifer. This hypothesis has been con-firmed by recently collected geologic and water quality information. Table 3contains the results of recent chemical analyses for volatile organic com-pounds. These analyses show that the glacial drift aquifer has been impactedby spills or leaks, but the sandstone bedrock aquifer is virtually unimpacted.
Samples from each of the 22 on-site wells listed in Table 3 were also analyzedfor 47 base-neutral fraction priority pollutants. These compounds were notdetected (at a detection limit of 0.01 milligrams per liter) in most of thesamples except as shown in Table 4. Except for naphthalene, the other com-pounds found are classified as "plasticizers" which are not used in the repairshop. The presence of phthalate in the bedrock aquifer* but minimal distri-bution in the glacial drift aquifer, suggests that this material did notoriginate on GTW property.
-12- 0000763
TABLE JRESULTS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COVOUM) AMALVMS Of CROUWHAIEH
Aquifer • Vinyl Chloro- 1Nell No. Chloride eth«M
Cl*ci*l Drift1 0.01 0.02
I-A1-82
2-A3 0.09 0.0*
3-A 0.0**
*-A5 0.01 p7 0.01a
T-11
BedrockI-C5-A
7-A P8-A
9S-AT-16E-2B
CT-ICT-2
1,1-Dlchloro-•thylene
l.i--
0.002--•
0.0090.02*--
0.00*—
0.0010.008--
----
----—--—----
1,l-0ichlor«-•tfune
4.90.0170.003--—
0.850.0970.0010.0110.0050.01*0.067--
--•-
0.002—------——
t-l,2-Dlchlon>- 1,2-Dichloro-ethylene etnene
0.98 0.080.016 0.001
0.002—--
0.021 0.0020.057 0.005..
0.026 0.0020.00*0.0150.068 0.002
—
--—
0.001
--—--
0.001"--
1,1,1-Irl-chloroethene
«90.700.0*10.1*
--0.200O.*000.0210.09*"
0.0020.00*
--
---•
----------—--
Tr ichloro-ethylene ften/ene
11 P0.710.0450.68--
0.050 0.00*0.180 0.003--
0.350 0.001"
0.0010.067 0.001"
..
--
,.
------
0.038----
Ietr*chloro- Ethyl Methyleneetny 1 ene Benzene Ch 1 or i or ( 1 1 Chl orot or* la ' uene
0.03 0.19 0.02 0.0! 0.010.020.0510.006-'
0.097 0.0150.160
—0.02*
—
"O.OOt"
p--
-,--- ---
0.00!----
MIE;All reiulti ihowi *r* in >i 1 I igr«*» per liter or p*rti p«r Billion.
Detection limit n4» 0.01 ejg/l for constituent* with *nilytes reported to hundredth* and 0.001 *g/l for conttituent* Kith unify 1*1 reported to thounndlhi.
-- indlc«te» th*t th* indicated constituent «*i nut found or was below detect*t»i Hty."P" indicate* th*t th* constituent »*i present but be I CM the 4Ccept4tile detectibi lity lieiit jnd therefore tjnnut De dccur^tely 40*1111 f isil.
Thirty vuletlle orgenic co*poundi mere included in the analytic*! lean. Coapound* not detected *re nut >tumn tit tnii t#ble.
jl) Hethylene chloride My be due to l*bor*tory cont*eiin*tion.«o*ulti reported here *re fro* *«Bple* collected in August dnd Septeeitier 1983, SdMplei tra* Helli CT-I 4 rid CT-2 h*vn been undlyied nu-eruui limes in the lilt ye J
<=>
O
TABLE 4BASE-NEUTRAL FRACTION COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN ON-SITE WELLS (mg/1
BIs-Aquifer and (2-ethyl hexylWell Number Naphthalene Acenaphthene Phenanthrene Phtha1 ate
Glacial Drift1 0.32
1A3A 0.17
T-13
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.010,03
0.08
Bedrock1-C8-A9
0.040.060.35
The available chemical analyses from all groundwater samples collected in theVerona well field and surrounding area were examined to determine if plumepatterns might provide a clue to the source of chemicals. A separate map wasprepared showing the distribution of wells Impacted by each chemical found todate. It is not currently possible to subdivide the analyses to show theextent of chemical plumes in different aquifers or at one point in time. Theresults of this effort are summarized in Figures 7 through 12. These figuresare Interpreted to show the following:
1. The plume of chemicals impacting the Verona well field is separate anddistinct from the plume found at the heavy repair shop. Therefore, theheavy repair shop contaminants are not contributing to the problem at theVerona well field.
2. The groundwater divide which roughly parallels Emmett Street has beenlocated south of the Thomas Solvent Annex site most of the time but thelocation has shifted at times to allow southwestward migration of somechemicals.
000076")
-13-
LEGEND1000 2000 3000_i
SCALE IN FEETG ROUND WATER GENERALLY EXCEEDS I hHCROGRAM/LITERGROUNOWATER GENERALLY EXCEEDS 10 MlCROGRAMS/LITERGROUND WATER OCNERALLY EXCEEDS 100 MlCROGRAMS/ LITER
NOTETHE DISTRIBUTION SHOWN HERE is SAseo ONCHEMICAL A N A L Y S E S PERFORMED CRQM OCTOBER, 1981THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1963 .
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMRXNY
PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OFTETRACHLOROETHYLENE
FIG 9SEPT. 1993 20225
0000766
SCALE IN FEET
GMOUNOWtTCH WHtBALLT CXCCC03 I MlCHOGHAM/UlTCK6ROUNOWATCH OCNKRALLT CXCCtOS 10 MICMQMM3/ UlTM«WUHO*»T«« aiNeWtLLY UCIC08 100 t*IC«OORAM»/UTM
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMPANY
PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION 0I, I- DlCHLOROETHANt
FIG.10THE DISTRIBUTION SHOWN MSRE is disto ON
AN4\.tSES PERFORMED *ROM OCTOBER,'981THROUGH SEPTEMBER
0000767
1000 gOOO 3000
SCALE IN FEET——— I ——— GROtJNOWATER GEMeMLLT EXCEEDS I MIWOGIMM/LJTEH———10—— GHOUNOWATEB GENEBALLf CXCCE03 10 MlCWWHAMS/LITEH—— 100—— G«OUNOWATE« GENERALLY EXCEEDS 100 MICBOGHAMS/LITER
NOTET^e DisrRiBur;or( SHOWN HEBE is SiSEO ONOEM CAL ANit'SES PERFORMED "OM CCT03EB, 1981 - . _THBOUOM 5EPTEM8EH 1983 0000768
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMR4NY
PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OFTRICHLOROETHYLENE
FIG. IISEPT 1983 20223
- I:
-I ——— SROUNOWATER GENERALLY EXCEED! I MKROGRAM/LITER-10—— QHOUNOWATEM QCNCRALLT EXCEEDS 10 MICftOGHAMS/ LITER100—— QROUNOWATER OCNERM.LY CXCFEDS 100 MICftOQRAMS/ LITER
NOTE.THE DISTRI8JTION SHOWN M£»E IS 8ASEO ONCHEMICAL A N A L Y S E S PERPQRMED FROM OCTOBER, 1981THROUGH SEPTEMBER I9B3.
0 1000 2000 3000I—————I—————1—————ISCALE IN FEET
GRAND TRUNK WESTERNRAILROAD COMRVNY
PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OF1,2 - OICHLOROETHANE
FIO. iaSEPT. 1983 20225
00007G9
I
IIIIIII
^
M
H
Soil Quality
Soil samples were collected and analyzed by MDNR from GTW property prior tothis study phase. The first samples were collected adjacent to the heavyrepair shop from well number 1 which is located near a leak from a solventstorage tank. The soils to a depth of 16 feet were found to be contaminatedby solvents, principally 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), as shown in Table5.
TABLE 5RESULTS OF ONR ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FROM WELL 1.
Location
Site of Well II2'4'7'6"10'12'14'16'
NOTE:
1,1,1-TCA TCE CHCL, PCE 1,1-DCA
1.515.09.82.18.2
16.06.3
0.032--——
0.0250.750.55
0.0015
0.150.69
Results are milligrams per liter (parts per million)1,1,1-TCA - 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
TCE • Trichloroethylene
I CHCL. » ChloroformPCE » Tetrachloroethylene
1,1-DCA = l,l-D1chloroethane
In addition, surface soil samples were collected along 6 railroad switchesnorth of Emmett Street by DNR. These locations are shown in Figure 2.Analysis of these samples did not detect the presence of any volatile organiccompounds.
-14- 0000770
iAn expanded soil sampling program was implemented by GTW because of thepossibility that materials carried by the railroad may have been lost in theMarshal 1 ing Yard.
Soil sample sites were selected where large spills or leaks would likelyaccumulate. The samples were collected in open ditches near the discharge endof pipes which drain adjacent areas both on and off Grand Trunk Westernproperty. Soils directly below the railroad tracks were not sampled becauseof the thick ballast. The sites are described in Table 6 and general loca-
*H( tions are shown in Figure 2.
^B Eleven of the twelve soil samples collected during this study phase containedlow levels of volatile organic compounds. Trichloroethylene was the compound
J found most often as shown in Table 7. These results suggest that volatileorganic compounds may have been lost in the area of the old roundhouse andmarshalling yard, but the observed concentrations are so low that they may be
B background levels. These low levels of chemicals may also come from propertyadjacent to the railroad property as samples 9, 10 and 12 were collected at
mm locations which receive off-site runoff.
•i
0000771-15-
r • mmTABLE 6
DESCRIPTION OF SOIL SAMPLING SITES
EDISoilSampleNumber
1 Dry ditchbasins in
Site Characteristics Odor
. Downstream of 8-inch pipe which drains catch Nonesouthwest portion of marshalling yard. Ditch
SampleDescription
Dry Sand
Depth
12"
drains north toward sampling location 15.
2
3
4
As above.
As above,
Dry ditch
Musty
but track area drained is larger. None
. Next to 12-inch pipe which drains catch basins None
Dry Sand
Moist Sand
Dry Sand
12"
12"
12"in northwest portion of marshalling yard.
Dry ditch. Upstream of concrete junction box. This ditchbegins about 700 feet south of sample location #1 andturns west to the river at this site.
None Moist ClayeySand
3"
oooo
Dry ditch. Upstream of concrete junction box. This loca-tion is the southern end of the ditch before it turns westto the river.
Dry ditch. Next to discharge of 12-inch pipe which drainscatch basins in the northeast portion of marshallinn
Musty
None
Dry Sand
Dry Sand
12"
12"
m m m mTABLE 6
DESCRIPTION OF SOIL SAMPLING SITES(Continued)
EDI
SoilSampleNumber
8
Site Characteristics
Ditch with standing water.drains entire southeastern
Next to 24-inch pipe whichportion of marshalling yard,
SampleOdor Description
None Black Clayand Silt
Depth
12"
including the car repair shop. Clear oil droplets on watersurface.
Dry ditch. Upstream of dry well. Ditch receives runofffrom residential (and commercial?) area south of thislocation.
Musty Sandy Clay 12"
10 Ditch with standing water. Next to culvert which drainsoff-site area.
Fuel Oil Clayey Sandand Black Clay
24"
11
oo
OJ
12
Dry ditch. Next to pipe which drains "car cleaningtracks".
Ditch with rapidly flowing, clear water. Next to pipewhich drains area to east.
FamiliarChemical
None
Moist Clayey 12"Sand, Some
White Material
Sand and Gravel 12"
m u m mTABLE 7
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF SOILS
EDISoil
Sample Methylene Trichlorof luro-No . Ch 1 ori de methane
12 0.037 0.033(1*34567891011 0.01512
Trans 1,2-Dichloro- 1,1,1-Trl- Trichloro-e thy 1 ene chloroethane ethylene
0.050—
0.0060.015
--—
0.0130.009
0.034--—
0.007
Tetrachloro- Chloro-ethy 1 ene To 1 uene benzene
0.0270.006—
0.0060.007
--—
0.009—
0.012 O.OJ2--— — — — _ _
^J (1) A second "freon" compound, l,l,2-trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane, at 0.31 mg/kg was found In this sample•^ This compound is not an ERA priority pollutant.
t<: ^ PP in nil 1 ] "j \fil nnram nr- na »*t-r nnr- mi 1 1 •>/-.«
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
No evidence was found during this investigation that chemicals found ingroundwater at the heavy repair shop have contributed to the contaminant plumeimpacting the Verona well field. The plume at the heavy repair shop ismigrating toward the Battle Creek River, and is restricted to the generalvicinity of the shop. In addition, the chemicals are almost exclusivelylimited to the glacial drift aquifer because of the clay zone which separatesthe glacial drift aquifer from the sandstone bedrock aquifer.
Soil samples collected during this study contain low levels of volatileorganic compounds but these levels may be only background levels. Some ofthese compounds have migrated to GTW property from off-site sources.
_19_ 0000775
APPENDIX A
METHODS FOR OBSERVATION WELL CONSTRUCTION AND SAMPLE COLLECTION
0000776
BEDROCK WELLS
All bedrock wells were constructed using standard hydraulic rotary techniquesto produce an open hole for the four-inch casing and air rotary techniques toproduce an open hole in the bedrock formation after casing had been installed.Procedures that were fol lowed for each of the wells except 1-c were asfollows:
1. The drilling rig and all materials were washed thoroughly and rinsed withclean water prior to entering the job site. The casing was capped withaluminum foil after being washed and was stored on the water truck untilplaced in the hole.
2. All drilling water was obtained from an uncontaminated off-site source(the driller's water well).
No thread compound was used on casing threads or drill rod joints.
The open hole was terminated when solid sandstone was encountered.Casing was installed at this point and grouted in-place. Groutingconsisted of the following steps:
a. The casing was solidly seated on the bottom of the open hole and themud inside the casing flushed using air and clean water.
b. Forty gallons (30 gal in Well 9-A) of neat cement grout was mixedand poured into the casing. The mixture consisted of one 94 poundbag of Portland Type IA cement to 10 gallons of water.
c. A wiper plug was positioned above the grout and forced to the baseof the casing with water pressure and/or the drill rods.
d. The casing was forced into the bedrock several inches with a rigoperated hammer to assure a seal.
e. The casing was filled with clear water, capped and allowed to restfor approximately 24 hours.
A-l 0000777
t5. All equipment, including drill rods and mud pit, were flushed with clean
water.
H 6. After the cement had cured, the water was flushed from the casing and anopen hole constructed below the casing.
^ ^7. Each well was developed by pumping with air until relatively particle-
H free water was produced.
ft 8. A locked, vented cap was installed on each well.
•Well 1-C was constructed in a similar manner except the casing was not groutedin place. The casing In this well was driven several feet into the bedrock.
'ri0 The casing was not cleaned prior to installation.
_ GLACIAL DRIFT WELLS• ———The glacial drift wells were constructed using hollow-stem auger techniques.
JX The procedures used for wells 5, 7, 8 and 9 were as follows:
•• 1. The drilling machine and augers were cleaned with soapy water and thor-oughly rinsed prior to entering the study area. The augers were scrubbed
•with soapy water and rinsed with clean water between each hole. Thecasing was also cleaned and rinsed prior to being brought to the drillsite. The casing was stored on a trailer until placed in the hole.
2. Drilling water was obtained from an uncontaminated source (Grand Trunk• Western water supply).
• 3. No thread compound was used on the casing threads. No pipe was cut orthreaded on-site.
4. An exploration hole to obtain split spoon cores was constructed prior to
a install at ion of the well. This exploration hole was plugged withcuttings and bentonite.
A-2 0000773
5. The well was installed using the following techniques:
a. The augers were advanced to one foot above the desired top of thescreen and sediment in the augers flushed with clean water.
b. Casing and screen were lowered to the bottom of the hole and driveninto undisturbed sediments until the top of the screen was one footbelow the augered hole.
c. The augers were pul led back approximately one foot and bentonitepellets (Volclay) dropped into the annular space as the augers werebeing removed. Approximately three to five feet of annular spacewas filled with the bentonite pellets.
d. The augers were removed from the hole and the annular space abovethe bentonite was backfilled with native soils and bentonite.
6. Each well was developed by pumping it with a rig operated rod pump untilV relatively particle free water was produced.
jfl 7. A vented cap with a padlock was installed on each well.
•J Glacial drift wells 1 through 4A were installed using the same basic tech-• niques except:^
S^ i. Bentonite seals using bentonite pellets were not installed in the annularspace.
^ W
2. The casing and screen were not driven below the augered hole.i3. The augers and casing were not cleaned prior to construction of each
• well.
« 4. Thread compound may have been used on casing joints. Some threads mayhave been cut on-site using thread cutting lubricant.
A-3 0000779
WELL SAMPLING PROCEDURE
—. Water samples for laboratory analysis were collected with care to assure theTjt sample was representative of the formation tapped by the well. With the
exception of Well 8, which was a low producer, the sample was collected after• a minimum of five casing volumes of water had been removed from the well. The
sample collection procedure consisted of the following steps;
1. The quantity of stagnant water in the well was determined.
|2. A centrifugal pump was used to remove at least five times the quantity of
jm stagnant water in the casing (see the_ form following this section).
3. A brass Kemmerer type sampler was used to collect the water sample.Teflon tape was used to cover the rubber stoppers. Each sample wascol lected in the open hole section of the well or directly above thescreen.
II5
1IIII
4. Samples for volatile organic analysis were place in standard 40 ml vials.Care was taken to assure that the bottle did not have an air bubble.Duplicate samples were collected from each well.
5. A one-gallon sample was collected for analysis of base neutral compounds.
6. Samples were stored on ice immediately after collection and delivered tothe EDI laboratory the same day collected.
Three wells could not be sampled as described above because of low yield or anobstructed casing which prevented use of the Kemmerer sampler. For wells 4and T-13, a small diameter copper bailer with an open top and bottom checkvalve was used to collect the sample. Well #8 was both purged and sampledwith the copper bailer.
*-« 0000780
APPENDIX B
CONSTRUCTION RECORDS FOR WELLS
0000781
iI
iVI
OWNER
CITV
{ayne Northern CompanyA Division of Lavne-Wemrn Co.
401 SOUTH DELORENZt AVENUE, P.O. BOX 468. MISHAWAKA, INDIANA 46544
WELL & PUMP INSPECTION REPORTGrand Trunk Railroad
409 W. Jameaon Street, Battle Crekk, MI 49016
WELL NO L'QCAT.ON Round House
OIA. *2" DEPTH 121> SCREEN I D "°ne TYPE _IZlL.UENGTH Caal"^PTM TO TOP * 3 ' *"
DATE DRILLED
DATE INSPECTED 11-24-82
.DATES OF CLEANING
__ PERSON TO
sterilized 1973
DOUK Williamaon 616-966-5233
CONTACT LOCATION
CAPACITY
ORIGINAL
AFTER LASTCLEANING
PRESENT AT LINEPRESSURE
DATE
1940
1978
1982
STATIC
8 . 5 *
9'
10*
GPM
1045
683
692
PUMPINGLEVEL
12.5
11.5
12.5
PRESSURE
w/ tes tDump
71//
55#
SPECIFICCAPACITY
261
273
277
AIRLINE LENGTH Probe
TEST WILL BE COMPLETE THROUGH:
TOP OF CHECK ___ METEfl _ FLANGE OR THREAD SIZE _J1_
TOTAL PUMP SETTING 45'4 '^ MOTOR H P. ^0 PHASE 3 CYCL^U VOLTS j20/44
PUMP MFG Lavne 12" RKLC-4______________ SER. NO. 22191
RATED CAPACITY 600. .GPM; 200' .TDH; OPERATING PRESSURE
DATE INSTALLED r^fttg pmnp 195.0. DATESOP OVERHAUL 1956^61.66.73.78SIZE OF
IS CHECK VALVE LEAKING' YES_ NO_ DOES STUFFING BOX HAVE SPRING? Y£S_NO__ PACKING
TMJ FOLLOWING i_C TO 5E PERFORMED DURING EACH INSPECTION
_____________ REPACK PUMPCM iNGE MOTOR OIL ft GREASE'Place c^ech r^arv wn«n c
GREASE PUMP.
PUMP IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPING: 600-GPM;
176'_TOH; SHUT-OFF HEAD FT.
ELECTRICAL DATA WITH PUMP IN OPERATION: 38-38-39 AMPS.
PUMP RUNS ________ HRS. PER DAY UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONSREMARKS (Note any aOnormal condition) _____ _______________ _
VQLTS: PHASE
Pump per fo rmance down 16ff, could wait another year, but is due for overhaul
INSPECTED BY. N. Mago/B. Guy
LNo-14
0000782
6 T " CURVE r O.PT : J
6
i
•
ai*
| l*r i. lie*
1 LOWERLOV/ST7LO-.V2.7LOWSR
.Q°NT.
4210
HUM...
1•>3<>
4f--
1Z5Q__R PM
IAYKC 4 BOWIER, INC.M»aphU. Ten*.
SINGLE STAG€ LA3Oi?ATORYHEAD & HORSE POWER
THRUST "K" =9.0
0000783•H
*aiHT*.O \ri U
X .vt'^ -«i
^ ^ p
Vj v V; *^ S< M ~^ V ^ -g ^ * V^ ts t 4|s|!iM£. •>. vi '* i <" r\j ;sj vvi QO M
" ^ $ v^ ^ t'Hi --> ^ 2 u- <I ^ ir^ :\ c ^ •k- V- Ti ,i • p^ v£ ^.^'x <^ ^>55 $- , 5--V (> = ^ ^}\p ^ ^ $^^ . %• M
^- ^ ^?iv^^0
~l
/•n \%( ti!( I " \viJL L{
i^~ -~
K-^-
'^fc:1:^ 4'•*T*— ' ,
> ».•Vftjl-
F^bI-P\7\IJ]—
-,
• J I
^^
"ci"
VJ
-f••' J
^
5^t-\ ^J
1^s.if-/'r+i/'
*M
^*
1j-.^— r
k—
}>^
1— ft-
- -' ' J
c ^
t5--NK
•
T)i
^K
;-s>
TF4/
3-, HJ^^^^y :•j>Tx
r^"-J
-i?U-IM:t
/T±
T»
trf• iHFnt i
^t--4J^j
T!O~4j^_J*oT)^t
T3Q
O-
O-;' - t r jT>
'«D
"\«V:
^?
«b
"75O
(2
V
V
C.
^
r-V.
:
h>
t)i><i
bj
^>b
ia
sT_^-r— ^ ^«S|
— —— _ ———
J^-l —————
i:«.•*
*^w — -
\TN
c(•I
, ^•.rt-J, ^-
; ^--A-rS*-^-~-\ V "J - • V— i —— •"*• *:- i • r^t~t • ..-=--• y q\
i ^ i'K ! ? : • \ ^ T,. f-rr——r.-1- ———— - yj-
Tl^K-l
-i- '-M ! %/^--- tJ -rt_J_ -^
^ ! ^| ' |t " ". s
t-taQ
>
^ ? o* ^ s^ 5=! 1 ! ~i- ' ^ 3n 1 31 1 1
- QC T<^ >b .n" ———— ' — *~Q
-IaBr«>
-»?•
,n'in
frwt
•
0-•*A
^- t$-T^ »«S5.
% v>^ T —— ^ TA^-h- \!J.. i| **?•; v/^ ^ V /»li^^c
^ ^^ | \
.!>
^1$.'
* *-j ^ -^ q«
--, - o-f -•IT*
————————————— f**-
=H- -1 —————————————
"5KA
^
^
^^
T5^i^
?5! ^! <-rl x
flfe ^f cS§
LLU
>xj
0s1
1 ^> IP ^ ^• & ^
[t 'OH ^ ^ '<^ibr-- * — •- ° ^ °*jki
^^^SFsnSy
0M113°l sfi*«, c^
=w! !s*^ 1J
•X ^~-
1_ 1H ———— .r ^
————— *
r i \f •• -wSBJ | <§ g
^^^ ^ S'' ^ t I? 0p —— Ll^• i1 **vii
vo':^
,' '<J -o £
IItI
Iri
4I
3
E ep
• A -;.j.'ji.":o Lh'/j.:,
—— \
th 1
D3'
,3'U" 1
Depth 121»
n> > , ><v^^T
•- ' u-^
7*6"1 "* Concr-j ta
GrnrjrfxLtf rai
.^ — _ ————— Original
r^ _ |' l^Black *1raarV Pipe
"° Wei^nt 51 Ibs. per ft.Dyers V.'rou^ht Iron Pipe
8 ——— 12I! welded teo with 12^ standard coupling flan
• — Steel Drive Shoe
4 ———— 12" Rock Hole
StatJPunpcat_l2
Dril]Date
C/j^^
B
I AY!
Static Level 0'6"CPU
at 12* 'buaoigg Level
Driller" JAL3S NESSDate Finishedl2-22-39
C<r .
LAY1TE ROCK WELL ;^2For
"AA2-iD TaUI-iK V^STISN PJVILROAD CO.Battle Creek, VJ.chi-ftn
UYHE HORTHERil GO, IMG,MISHAWAKA. IMDIAMA
Sot drawn to scaleAll depths measured from Ground Level
DRAWN OY
Appnovco OY H«KsithDATE 1-Q-liO
ONAWINO NO.
0000785
LAYNE-NORTHERN COMPANY
1IIII
1
I
I
MtSHAWAKA, INDIANA
i ...•..-.:,.•, 7 <* i -iWELL LOG No._2 _„ City _T.'ri.E C7^;'K,_
Owner ^7.-.::p T3"re '.'.l-'T l" 7..'.I'."V.Y rQ;?A:."Y
Location of Well _l*L--I7_AT_ JVOj;:iD_i:Qu*ii3__ ___
_ _County .. 7.U/V"Township _^A. M.
___Section ___<5State
FORMATION FOUND
Pit
Soft Scmd Sock
2rol:cn S^r.i 7,ock
Sar.d 3ocl:
•3 oft Shala
3hal*
THICKNESSOK
STRATUM
30'
_ 30'
IS'
17'
1'
27' ...
1' _,
DEPTH TOBOTTOM OFSTRATUM
30'
£-0.
75*
>:o-
1 STATICWATERLtVEL
Gt 5't
._.. .——
TEMP. REMARKS
Date Started !2rlj5-39 Finished^ 12-22-j3 _ _ _ _ _DRILLER
(iKETCH OF LOCATION ON SACK OF THIS LOG SHEF.T)
0000786
II
III
v
Company
OWNER
CITY
A Oiviiion of L*vn*-Weit»rn Co,40t SOUTH DELORENZI AVENUE, P.O. BOX 468, MISHAWAKA. INDIANA 46544
WELL & PUMP INSPECTION REPORT
Grand Trunk Railroad _____ ___
409 Wesc Jameson Street, Battle Creek, MI 49016
WELL NO LOCATION Round Hous«
0'* 16" DEPTH H6' SCR6eN, Di None TYP6 Rock LENGTH casing 0£PTH TO Tnp & 3'I*.
DATE PRILLED 12-^g-3 9/jr.*-'- ••,',. QATEsopfi EAMMr. None S t er il ized 1973__________
DATE INSPECTED 11-24-82_____ _ ___ pgRsoN TO CONTACT Doug WilltaiTison 616-966-5233
CONTACT LOCATION
CAPACITY
ORIGINAL
AFTER LASTCLEANING
PRESENT AT LINEPRESSURE
DATE
1939
1978
1982
STATIC
8'
9 (
10'
GPM
1100
710
703
PUMPINGLEVEL
11(
11'12f
PRESSURE
W/testpump
760
40#
* SPECIFICCAPACITY
366
355
351
AIRLINE LENGTH
TEST WILL BE COMPLETE THROUGH:TOP OP CHECK __ METER _ FLANGE OH TH«E*O SIZE _8
TOTAL PUMP SETTING ^5 * ___ MOTOR HP *Q PHASP 3 CYCLS 60 VOLTS 220/440
Layne 12" RKLC-4 _____________ SER. NO. __2811A __________________
RATED CAPACITY
OAT6 INSTALLED
600 .GPM; 200' .TDH; OPERATING PRESSURE 54 to 58#
1-3-40 DATES OP OVERHAUL 1951.56.new bowl 61. 66. 73. 78SIZE OF „,„
IS CHECK VALVE LEAKING? YES_NOJL DOES STUPPlNQ BOX HAVE SPRING? YES_NOX_ PACKING _3_Zfl_
THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE »ERPQRMEP OUR INC EACH INSPECTION
______5_____ REPACK PUMP.CHANGE MOTOR OIL & GREASE(P'dct c^eck mark whtr>
GREASE PUMP.
PUMP IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPtNG: 600 .GPM; 132* TPH: SHUT-QPF HEAP 65tf 160*
^ PHASE
FT.
ELECTRICAL DATA WITH PUMP IN OPERATION: 39-A1-43 AMPS; 440 vrti Tg
PUMP RUNS ________ HRS. PER DAY UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONSREMARKS (Nott anv »bnOfmil condition) _____________„„____________________________
Note - 36tf drop In pressure - sec attached curve
1978 report indicates discharge column should be replaced at next overhaul
I
INSPECTED BY, N. Mago/B. Guy
LNO-U
0000787
f CURVE NO.; Tit.)
1 LOWERi LOWERLOWER
. LOWER 1
Q*
A
z10
.......1z34
CI75Q R PM
SINGLE STAGE LABORATORYHEAD & HORSE POWER
THRUST "K" =9.0
$.f
»"»lNTtO Ifl U i
NORTHERN COMPANYINDIANAPOLIS • MrSHAlYAKA • LANDING
PUMP INSTALLATION REPORTFH«N«.98U_A
Salei Order No. .
Pump Mlg. T^
Date _ 1-13-78
5«rlolNo.98UA_ Well No. C.f'2
Owner —Gr^fid Trunk Railroad
Loco I Ion of Well _____________
MOTOt: Moke ______________
Ciry__Batr._le_Cree_k_ stot» Michigan
Typo r.FM Frome
HP 40 volti 220/440 Unt v0ih,g«
Wat Motor Taken lo a repair ihop at thli Mmo?.GEAtDRIVE: Moke ____ _________
_ ___ .„ PSoi.Ser No. 192182
1800RPM
_._.,_ Where?
ENGINE: Moke'.
_ Serial No. __ _______ _ ._.
_ Model ________________
Gear Ratio _.
Serial No. __
PUMP HEAD Tvp* ^]H T.ayne Head8"Diicharg* Pip* Slie
Ue0f.J ....abOVe °b°** groundDelow •
Ftongarf .,_ x . , — Thr»nH»d
Separate •*•• Plata? YfiS
H.0d Shaft r.ngtk 64"
PI, 1LH f i j «bflv« ^JJ. . . ,Ola. JJ»1! ——— Coupled h-)aw
MOTOR SHAFT: Oio. m" L*ngth
Thread Silo In Heod J^Key way 3/3
WJMF ftOWl Type pj,LC
Dla. 12" Na. of Staa** *
Bowll - Catt Iran ar Bran>a> „ . .CI_ _ _
Shaft .55 X « Length
COLUMN pipe <•'• 8"X
flnng»d CtJupl*d
$p»rial Point? .
Oil Lube Wal*r tube X-
ShaftSlr. IV SS x «r«
Tubing Site .. ,. ,., $ll . qr Br
SUCTION PIPE SIT- 8"
l.nglk 10 ?ptCl«l Pnifif)
Ihreodt an BaHamf . . . .
Slrainar «[>•
ffuhb*r BumfMrT
W.H S.al»
NOTE — All moatvromonttfrom top ol pump foundation.Intido Ote. _______ Depth115 Static _:
GrovelTubulor
Typo: Roek
Stropped to Column?.Air Lino Ungth none________
Typo Airline _________ Ploilie _____ .Copper Tubing ____ Sleet Plpo _
PUMPING TEST • Pumped Z12______ GPM at ________ Ft. Pumping level .with __3J______ Ibi, discharge pr«ijure after ________________ houri.
Pump lo Woile Ou'iide _ _.__ Intlde Site THO.O.
PUUING INSHUOIONS
Length of Polos required Re8ular
Irntrtictlons ________________
Special equipment or pulling
Power Llnof: _.
0000789 Imtaller
( (-- r - c X *tefl* VP "4VHfrB.
S
)
Cd
i S
I
IIIII
/T
Depth
Ground
iolo-.v
16 "Blaclc Steel PipeWeight SUbs. per ft
Steel Drive Shoe
Rock Hole
Not drawn to scaleAll depths measured n Ground Level
Static Level G1
Pumped UCO GPJJatil1 pumplnj Level
Driller J« 1'ocr & ;',Date Finished l--lu.-y
ROCX 7/ELLFor
900' South oj' :u.v>
LAYilE NOITHERN CO, KIOP.nSHAWAKA, INDIANA
,DRAWN orAPPBOVCO ovH. Keith
Dfuwma no.
0000791
LAYNE-NORTHERN COMPANYMI5HAWAKA. INDIANA
rera. Wlf-t Ic" Kock T/ell\VELL LOG No._1__. City r.ttlg. Creel:
Q-.vn.er. -^ - '-"^ Yr^3TS::HAIU?.AD
County _Cc_--"-n"rrTownship _L^Jn.Section ____JState__Uchij;r.
Location of Well. L"Il*3
Finished 12-12*39
FORMATION FOUND
Fill
Dirty Sft=d
Snnrf
fHr*y ?,*nA
•^hpl*
5 And Pock
Sand Rock
£&nd EocV-
SATI^ Softt
S<im«4 Prt**lp
,?^nj«
Sind-Roolc ————————————— i
Shnln
THICKNUSOF
STRATUM
l4-~ -
Jfc.__
.12
9
2 -
7
6
uklll),
DEPTH TOBOTTOM OF
STRATUM
J4.
Tfl
30-39
U3 ———
— PO ——
-57 ——AJ
-6?__JOP.
11?116
STATICWATERLEVEL
At— $1 _____
TEMP. REMARKS
5}Vlftl« {'ir«d
Stall •
DRILLER
iSKF.TCH OF LOCATION ON SACK OF THIS LOG SHEET)
0000792
o
«* MJ N(9m) B^oiin jg^ jfjgjnc.
oaruPPT
I mrATinN Battle Creek Yard
pnt;iPuPMT Stearns - Acker AO II
•G STFCHwiciAN . _ „;.:•_,
| pORINIrt MO 1
II ftinira ELEV .Casing: 833.47
SHPPT OP ,.
r:LiPMT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
PROJPCT NH 20129
OATP June 22, 1982
PPHMIT wr> /w oz- 8zz - *4 1 3
BORING LOCATION
i
\ *T^-> "^\ •** /V: - ;
f /i*' *
HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonite
STOPFEET
FROM
0.0
1.0
1.77.0
13.5
TO
1.01.77.0
13.516.0
Sand and gravel
NO, BLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 1« 8 IN.
DEPTH Of TEST
Wood - old R.R. tiesSand and cinders, very soft, black, oilySand, brown, fineSand, fine, gray, wet
O1
2'4'6'8'10'12'14'
*EC( VERl50%25*50%75%75%70%70%
60%
——
hit sto
GROUNOWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER \/2 HRS -
BORING CAVE IN ——
13.7
13.5
,FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA
CASING USED:
Screen set @14*5-17*5'
*Pumps some silt
TVPP galvanized
IV
LENGTH 16'°"
0000793
SCREEN LENGTH.,.,& SLOT SIZE ™fex36x42
7 s otHT. ABOVE GROUND —Ls—
I
I
USGSELEVATION
g 3.?. tT
CAP WITH tOCK
S/7- V
£(3.5
y
rt
1
1
3
1
*•*
' *
•••4
5
]
i
9'
1
kt
'L**r —W.t
i0'
f
•i ,
V'
b * •
.•*'•;•'
* >
•::
*" ' •i * '• ••:*»*.*
•••
• i* 4* 1
•••4
EBd-
;"-v1 . •
, .% **,"*>-"*. ^
*\•**!
*» •,'*'«.*,*•
V.".."";
Lll
*-
GROUND St
--—8' HOLE
^- — - l^SALV. CA!
^ —— NATIVE SOIL
———— JOHNSON "»STAINLESS7 - SLOT , 3
DATE CONSTRUCTED
0000794ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No. J__
AUG. 1993 20225
Environmental Data Inc.
SHEET * OF
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
PROJECT Kin 20129-87________
DATE August 12, 1982_________
PERMIT NO.
PROJECT .
LOCATION Battle Creek
PQIIIPMPISJT Stearns Acker AD II
TECHNICIAN G.S.
BORING NO. —ii
SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 834.IB
HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonite
BORING LOCATION
\ ,,.V
«<i£
m?FEET
PROM
U.O
8.0
15.019.0
TO
8.015.0
19.028.0
Rubble
NO. SLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO. SLOWS 3rd fl IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 9 IN.
NO. BLOWS t« 6 IN.
DEPTH Of TEST
Sand - fine, brownSand - fine to medium, occ stoneSand and gravel
Pumped for 35 minutes 9 3% gpm » 122 gallons
——
-
GROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT 15'
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS _
BORING CAVE IN ——
,FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA
CASING USED TVDC galvanized
2"
LENGTH 26
SCREEN LENGffHfjillQless& SLOT SIZE " x48 7 Slot
0000795HT. ABOVE GROUND 3.0'
usesELEVATION
8 3 />8
831.Z
•CAP WITH LOCK
S'S.Z
-787.7
^
,
t
i
i•, '
\ i
, 1
JSo'
!i
[ i
I'
.0
^-W.T
0'
*V
^\
0
£•'•'*•
* *.1
••**,,%*•
*;j'
;XMil* *
* •
4 «
• :j '+ 4
*i •
• *4
a. j
* •• •
> ** , ~-.'
*<
* J|
-•^*,', »
i\» *,***.
*•
^
GROUND SI
^- —— 8 " MOLE
*- —— 2"GALV. CA«
^^ — NATIVE SOU
1 ———— JOHNSON "«STAINLESS7 - SLOT , 4
DATE CONSTRUCTED
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No- I •<•'
AUG. 1983 Z0223 J
0000796
SHEET. .OF
Environmental Data Inc.CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
NO. 20129-87
DATE August 12, 1982
PERMIT NO.
PROJECT .
LOCATION Battle Creek, yard
EQUIPMENT. Acker AD II
NO. TW #1B
SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 834.58
HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonlte
BORING LOCATION
BORINGDEPTH
FEETPROM
0.0
8.015.020.033.041.5
TO
8.015.020.033.041.5
8-17-f
Rubble
NO. 8tOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 0 IN.
NO. BLOWS 1st 9 IN
DEPTH OF TEST
Sand - fine, brownSand - fine to medium occ cobbleSand and gravelSand - fine to medium, very clayeyClay
2 Pumped 9 19 gpm for 10 minutes
381318232833
41is
9769
1136
26
569
11643
26
——
hit5
1213854
21
roi1121241497
47
GROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT 15
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS _
BORING CAVE IN ——
FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA
CASING USED: TYPE galvanized
2"
LENGTH ——36 '°"
0000797SCREEN LENGTH stainless& SLOT SIZE ?"YaS" 7 slot
HT. ABOVE GROUND 3'Q"
9$I
Y-I
usesELEVATION63+ 5"8
79*-
CAP WITH LOCK
3'
W.T
53 i#\,* t
I'/. 'A
l.O't
GROUND SURFACE
•'*
a HOLE
2"6ALV. CASING
NATIVE SOILS AND BENTONITE
JOHNSON "WATER MARK SUPER"STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINTt - SLOT, 42" OPENINGS
DATE CONSTRUCTED *- '* •«
0000798ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL NQ. /-a
'*3
Environmental Data Inc.
SHEET.J__ OF *
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western
PROJECT NO.
PATE
20129-87
9' I98a
PERMIT NO. 1402-822-413
PROJECT Qn-Site Hydroeeological Study
LOCATION ________Battle Creek____
EQUIPMENT.
TECHNICIAN
BORING NO.
Klienfelt Cyclone - R300
G.S.
Well #1C
SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 833.64
HOLE PLUGGED WITH B*"tonite and Casing
BORING LOCATION
Seated into rock
HWPFEETFROM
0.0-
8.012.015.035.041.043.546.053.054.58497
TO
-
8.012.015.035.041.043.546.053.054.58497
102
6 5/8 bit to 88'3 7/8 bit to 88'-100r
Fill - ballast - wood oily smell
NO. SLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO. BLOWS 3rd fl IN.
NO. SLOWS 2nd a IN,NO. BLOWS 1« a IN.DEPTH OF TEST
Lost circulation from 4' - 6*Sand - fine, silty, clayeySand cemented and cinders oily smellGravel and Sand oily smellSand - coarse, sharp, oc 1" stoneClay - gray, sandy firmClay - gray, very sandy, softClay - gray, very firmClay - gray, firm, sandyClay - gray, sandy with pieces of weathered sandstoneSandstone, hardShale
*
!
102 107 Sandstone, hardGROUNDWATER
107 110 ShaleENCOUNTERED AT ———
COMPLETION
AFTER 1/4 HRS 15
IM
FT.
,PT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA
CASING USED:
Rock drilled with airand water injection
TVPC Black Steel
DIAMETER -JLl ———
LENGTH
SCREEN LENGTHA SLOT SIZE —0000799 HT. ABOVE GROUND,
ELEVATION CAP WITH LOCK
8/8-7
748BEDROCK TOP
722- /
/ / '
23
/•$
WT.
GROUND SURFACE
6%"HOLE CONSTRUCTED 3YHYDRAULIC ROTARY
4~«*tV STEEL CASING
NATIVE SOILS ANO SENTONlTE
HC*T CCMCNT GROUT
3 7/8" OPEN MOLE CONSTRUCTED9Y AIR ROTARY
DATE CONSTRUCTEO
f ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No.Jl__
AUG. IM3 20223
0000800
Environmental Data Inc.
SHEET____OF
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
t*«*omt*Hr*i. a*aLO*i*ntc»<m*n
DATE
NO-___
August 13, 1982
PERMIT NO.
PROJECT .
uOCATION Battle Creek yard
EQUIPMENT,
TECHNICIAN
Stearns Acker AD II
G.S.
CORING NO- TW n
SURFACE ELEV Casing: 836.43
PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonlte
BORING LOCATION
\
FEET<OM TO
-.0 0.5).5i.5i.O
6.515.022.0
Sand - fine, black, oily
NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 9 IN.
NO. SLOWS 1« 6 IN.
DEPTH OF TEST
Sand - fine to medium, brownSand - Fine to medium, gravely binder, brownSand - medium to coarse and gravel, some fines
Pumped for 90 minutes 9 1.7 gpm » 150 gallons
——
GROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT 14.5
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ____ HRS _
BORING CAVE IN ——
FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA
CASING USED: TVPC galvanized
DIAMETER —— £L~
LENGTH 21'0stainless
HT. ABOVE GROUND
ooooaoi• fVM^.m -*^-"
usesELEVATION •CAP WITH LOCK
831.4
ii
' /<-
i
k ',
»1.0'
J_
GROUND SURFACE
9" HOLE
2 QALV. CASING
NATIVE SOILS ANO BENTONITE
JOHNSON WATER MARK SUPER"STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINT7- SLOT, 41" OPENINGS
DATE CONSTRUCTED
0000802ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No. J:__
AUG. 1983 20225
SHEET. .OF
Environmental Data Inc.fMVfftOMMfMr«4. SCMMn»TVCM
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
20129-87•» QMBMi <••» MIMMV. U. P« •Ml
PROJECT NO.__
OATE ____August 12, 1982
PERMIT NO. 7. - >4 i 3
PROJECT
LOCATION Battle Creek yard
EQUIPMENT
TECHNICIAN
BORING NO. TW #2A
SURFACE ELEV Casing: 836.2 +
HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonite
BORING LOCATION
w• Ot. TO
0.0
O . f j6.5
'.0.5,
0.56.5
15.037.540.0
Sand - fine, black, oilv
NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO- BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 6 IN.
NO- BLOWS 1st 6 IN.
DEPTH OF TEST
Sand - fine to medium, hrnwnSand - fine to medium, binder, brownSand - medium to coarse and gravel, some finesClay - gray, sandy, moist
Well developed and pumped 9 10 gpm for 45 minutes » 450 gal.
3.5
8,5
13*818»}23*328*|
32438H
——
2
410139191230
2
6132212262636
37
17
1810393240
5
13304022655876
GROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT 14.5
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ____ HRS _
BORING CAVE IN ——
FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA
CASING USED TYPE galvanized
niAUPTFP 2"
.FT. 36'0"
.FT
0000803
LENGTHSCREEN LENGTH,stainless& SLOT SIZE 2 X48"
10 slot,HT. ABOVE GROUND J'u
cUSGSELEVATION
^
^goo
'CAP WITH LOCK
W.T
33
BU
'**,
GROUNO SURFACE
3" HOLE
2"GALV. CASING
NATIVE SOILS AND BCNTONITE
JOHNSON "WATER «ARK SUPER 'STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINT10- SLOT , 4l" OPENINGS
DATE CONSTRUCTED •-•*•-»*
0000804ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No. 2 A
AUG. 1903 20225
IEnvironmental Data Inc.
SHEET____OF ____
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
PROJECT
OATE
20129
August 16, 1932
PERMIT NO.
PROJECT
LOCATION Battle Creek vard
Stearns - Acker AD II
TECHNICIAN G.S.
TW #3BORING NO.SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 834.94
HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonlte
BORING LOCATION
»BPFEET
FROM
'o.o1.0
11.016.0
TO
1.0
11.016.021.0
Sand - black. o11v
NO. SLOWS LAST 12 IN.NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN
NO. BLOWS 2nd 8 IN.
NO. SLOWS 1»t 0 IN
DEPTH OF TEST
Sand - fine to medium, brownSand - fine to sllt^wetSand and gravel strong fuel oil odor
Pumped 3 0.4 gpm for 90 minutes 36Pumped 9 0.9 gpm for 60 minutes 54
90 aallons
——
GROUNOWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT 14
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS -
BORING CAVE IN ——
,FT..FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA
CASING USED TYPE galvanized
2"
LENGTH 20'
SCREEN LENGTH ,. 7& SLOT SIZE z *48 '
HT. ABOVE GROUND 3.0'
0000805
usesELEVATION CAP WITH LOCK
83J.9
8I&.
810.9
_
/
11
.:'
•
I
l!
•••
7 '
'
>
* '
i
,
.9
rL , —WT.
\.0'f
'*".'
*"•*
KN
•;":r«'<• *,••,1 ••;:>••*»»*•. »*'
' .**h * '
••*
^^m
7*
s
•••<
sb -
* *• '
;-\';
^ *i
i*0•*i*
: :
»,*%
*,.•4
> -
GROUND Si
^ — 9 " HOLE
^ —— 2"GALV. CA,
^ — NATIVE sou
- ———— JOHNSON "vSTAINLESS7 - SLOT , A,
DATE CONSTRUCTED
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No. _2_
AUG. 1963 20229
0000806
Environmental Data Inc.mrnrmtiHiMUMHM
SHEET____OF
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
PROJECT NO._
DATE August 13, 1982
PERMIT NO.
PROJECT .
LOCATION Battle Creek yard
EQUIPMENT Stearns - Acker AD II
TECHNICIAN G-S-___________
BORING NO. TW I3A
SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 834.74
HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonlte
BORING LOCATION
T
1
1 9QQ1NG1 DEPTHFEETpI ppnu4
0.01.0
11.016.028.029.0
TO
1.011.016.028.029.032.0
8-16-E
Sand - black, oily
NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN
NO. BLOWS 3rd « IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 8 IN.
NO. BLOWS 1st 6 IN.
OBFTH OF TEST
Sand - fine to medium, brownSand - fine to sllty, wetSand and gravel *fuel oil - strong odor*Sand - fine, gray, clayeyClay blue, very sandy, very firm
2 Pumped for 90 minutes 9 0.4 gpm - 36Pumped for 90 minutes @ 4.0 awn « 360
39?
3813182328
31
354
15.511
39
366
U.517
40
4
67
252
32
—
7121336
49
GROUNOWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT 14*
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS _
BORING CAVE IN ——
FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA
CASINO USED TYPE galvanized
DIAMETER
LENGTH
SCREEN& SLOT SIZE
HT. ABOVE GROUND — 3-.°'
0000807
usesELEVATION 'CAP WITH LOCK
9 2 J , - )
a/a- '
80 3. 7
;
2
4
'3
J
V'
.
1 '
•
i
.7
W.t
\.0'|
,*v
;*-*
v *;*
1 *•
i i
;*;»•*k'1,t *
Li
* •
^^m
:
*— *
£L t
;'-.:
^\ A:.:^^* ^\*
•*•*;Jit *
•;";
r^
GROUND SI
-^ — 9 " HOLE
^- —— 2"GALV. CA!
^ —— NATIVE SOU
1 ———— JOHNSON "VSTAINLESSt • SLOT , 1
DATE CONSTRUCTED
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL NO. JUfi-
AUG. 1903 20223
0000808
SHEET. .OF
Environmental Data Inc.CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
PROJECT NO.
OATE August 16, 1982
PERMIT NO. O L - g 7. 7.
Battle Creek yard
PQIIIPMPMT Stearns - Acker AD II
TW 14BORING NO.
SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 835.0*
BORING LOCATION
J r\ i i"O 1
WtfPFEET
FROM
0.0
5.0
TO
5.021.0
Sand - fine to medium^ brown
NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS lit OIN.
DEPTH Of TEST
Sand - medium to fine, brown, binder
Pumped 9 17 gpm for 10 minutes • 170 gallons
——
GROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT 14.5
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS _
BORING CAVE IN __
FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT
WELL DATA
CASING USED TVPC galvanized
2"
LENGTH M U
SCREEN LENGTH ,RPA SLOT SIZE 2 *48
7 SlotHt ABOVE GROUND
0000809
usesELEVATION •CAP WITH LOCK
f
1
\
4
\
t-iIt
•
4V
I
i
>•
•
.0
•**r —
W.T.
0'
•V
•'r> *. ,'0
,/.1 *,•"•!• »
* ii:
,« •>Ar;-;X
• *
^H
: !
j
;'-/»:;• •
*, '
« «
p >
'?*•^/>* •
. V
',*-»/\\
'0» *.
*.*»t •>4 *
^J** •
,•!
*^
-
GROUND SI
^ — a " HOLE
^ —— 2"aALV. CAS
^. —— NATIVE SOU
' ———— JOHNSON %STAINLESS7 - SLOT , 4
DATE CONSTRUCTED «"*•
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No. _*
AUG. 1983 20229
00008J0
Environmental Data Inc.(WWMNMWm
SHEET————OF
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railrnad
PROJECT "ft 2Q129___________
OATP August 16, 1982_________
PERMIT NO. c Z. - S>1 Z -'4
PROJECT .
LOCATION Battle Creek yard
Stearns - Acker AD II
TECHNICIAN G.S.
BORING NO. I4A
SURFACE ELEV. Casing: 835.12
HOLE PLUGGED WITH Natural soils and bentonlte
BORING LOCATION
9'
FEETFROM
.0
5.021.030.043.047
TO
5.021.030.043.047.049.5
8-16-88-17-8
Sand - fine to medium, brown
NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 9 IN.
NO. BLOWS tit 6 IN.DEPTH OF TEST
Sand - medium to fine, brown, binderSand - medium to fine. occ. lens of brown clavSand and gravelSilt - grayClay - gray, sllty
1 Pumped for 30 minutes 9 0.4 gprn « 12 gallons1 Pumped for 3 hours 9 1.0 gpm * 180 gallons
192 gallons
•J-13
232833384349
-L
§76109211»
66109121011112
37JL.12..11168153
•"•
-
13U.22-19281826425
GROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT 14.5 FT.
WELL DATA
CASING USED:
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS -
BORING CAVE IN ——
.FT.
.FT.
TYPE galvanized
DIAMETER——2!—
LENGTH *0'4"
.FT.7 slot
HT. ABOVE GROUND——1L
00008U
usesELEVATION •CAP WITH LOCK
^-79V.fi
3
3
'
i
•
,
\
i i
/<•
••VH
73'
11
'
J 2
iL . —
W.T
0'
*• •.
:-»h, ^
i '*
V.V
* t
:i:.»*»
»**t *.
Ix
VMM
: !V '• *
svA
;-v
V;!
• N
,'f.. ^
^"\
,**
•0fe *%
*c*
• *,'
^
GROUND SI
--—a" HOLE
-- ——— 2" GALV. CA<
^^. —— NATIVE SOIL
———— -JOHNSON "«STAINLESS7 . SLOT , 4
DATE CONSTRUCTED
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No, 4-fl
AUG. 20229
00008 t2
Environmental Data (no.
SHEET____OF
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
PROJECT NO. 20225______________
DATE __________________________
PERMIT NO. 1402-822-413___________
PROJECT .
LOCATION
On-Site Hvdrogeloglcal StudyCalhoun County. Emmet TownshipStearns Drilling, Hollow Stem AugerKleinfelt 4 Sons. Hydraulic rotary
TECHNICIAN Pierce A Swansor.
BORING LOCATION
drift wells)bedrock)
Sec. 5 T25, R7W
BORING N
SURFACE EL
HOLE PLUG<
W3
r -A
0
6
' U"1
1 20
25
TO
6
11
20
25
30
(Refer to location map)Q 5 and 5A
Well 5A is 5 ft. northPV
of 5.
}FP WITH Cfifllfnt grnut, hentonlfJBand/or cuttings. NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 0 IN.
NO. BLOWS tst 0 IN.
DEPTH OF TEST
Sand, fine to coarse; oravel . fine to med. and clay brownsllty
as above, but black, some wood chips
Gravel, fine well sorted, some wood chips (base of fillat 15 feet?) Split spoon sample at 20 feet: sand, greyv fine to med, some pebbles (to l*s").
Gravel, fine to med. black shale chins.
Gravel fine; and sand, coarse, faint fuel oil odorsplit samples at 30 feet.' sand, fine to coarse and aravel
——
GROUNDWATER f1ne to med
ENCOUNTERED AT ———— FT.
WELL DATA Refer to DiagramCASING USED: TYPE ——
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS -
BORING CAVE IN ——
.FT. DIAMETER.
.FT.
.FT.
LENGTH
SCREEN LENGTH& SLOT SIZE ——
HT. ABOVE GROUND0000813
No. 5A Client
Project No
Date
- No. Blows last 12"
! Boring| DepthProm
. 30
*45
,/*
50t
60
70
71
75
85
90
94
L'i
To
45
50
60
70
71
75
85
90
94
97
103
No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of T«»t
Gravel, fine to coarse. More distinct fuel oil odor.Split spoon, sample at 40 feet: Gravel, fine to coarse, andsand, fine to coarse, silty, clayey.
Gravel, fine to med. with some fine to coarse sand.Fuel oil odor. Split spoon sample at 49 feet: Gravel fineto med, and sand, med to coarse, some silt and clay.
As above, but no odor. Occasslonal sandstone fragment.
Gravel, sandy, slltv. clavev. Grades toifine to coarsegravel at 70 feet. Some thin clay lenses.
Clay, grey, plastic some sand and silt.^
Clay, arev with larne oebbles and Interbedded aravel . fineto med.
Gravel, fine to med. some sand, med to coarse, intebeddded
clay, qrey.
Clay grey, somewhat sandy and slltv.
Gravel. Interbedded with clay as above. Clav is more sandv
Clav. liaht arev. stlckv. clastic, hard drillinn.
Sandstone, grey fine to very fine, siltv. clavev. someblack shale fragments.
—
0000814
iring No. 5A Client.'.
A
BoringDepth
prom
103
123
135
• ———•
-
--''
I
To
123
135
140
Shale, qrev. oilv film on mud o1t
Project No.
Date
No. Blows last 12"No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of T«»t
Sandstone, grey, v .v . fine to fine, silty. clayey.
Shale, dark grey, slightly sandy (v. fine to fine)
^
——
-
0000815
usesELEVATION
S2T.9S-
815.9
•CAP WITH LOCK
I3.1
*
•2
I
•v
^'
11
T 1\
3.9'
i
I
^
iL , —w.t
** 'l
* I *
..*>\ '•
V
i?,•*»,* <
.*4
1 •'
•*• *•*^
• *
10'
f>••«!
^•4
|Hmm*
••m***•au. j
GROUND SI
:-v
k*-*,*>»^
£:
'Vs
» %
m*"1
• •'r*>_*«
-^ — 8" HOLE
*- —— 2" GALV. CA
-——NATIVE SOU
r* —— VOLCLAY 8C( 3
^- ———— JOHNSON "* WSTAINLESS10 - SLOT , 3
-
DATE CONSTRUCTED
I ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL NO. _L_
AUG. 1963 20229
I 0000816
usesELEVATION WITH LOCK
825".
Bie-3
aCOMOCK
710.4
685".
\£2i
•'
l*
\
<K
2'
<•
1
•
9
1
^^B
i!
1
r
9
^
1•
i
*&
^
f^»^ •
• \
,*^>\,
i «*
^
GROUND SURFACE
X,VY
t*»'"••
1 ^,i> *..vi .
»s*
^ —— S V4" HOLE CONSTHHYDRAULIC ROTARY
- —— VGALV, STEEL CASI
^. —— NATIVE SOILS AND
^. —— NEAT CEMENT GROU
_^ —— 3 7/9" OPEN HOLE C^^ BY AIR ROTARY
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL Mo ?*•
AUG. I9«3 20225
0000817
Environmental Data Inc.
SHEET ———— OF
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
PROJECT NO. 20225________________
DATE _________________________
PERMIT NO. 1402-822-413___________
PROJECT
[LOCATION
On-Site HvdrogelogicalStudv
Calhoun Countv. Emmet TownshipStearns Drilling, Hollow Stem Auger
'EQUIPMENT Kleinfelt & Sons. Hydraulic rotary
HNICIAN Pierce \ Swanson
w I60RING NO.
SURFACE ELEV.
HOLE PLUGGED WITH cement, grnut. bentnn-it»
BORING LOCATION
(drift wells)[bedrock)
Sec. 5 T2S, R7W(Refer to location nao
J and/or cuttings.
ImpMOM
K n^^"^ U
R 5
TrH16U
rf?0_j
(30f
Vr
TO
5
10
16
20
30
50
NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN.
NO. SLOWS 3rcj 6 IN.
NO. SCOWS 2nd 0 IN.
NO. BLOWS itt 0 IN.DEPTH OF TEST
Gravel, fine to med. . sandy, very siltv elavpv.
Clav. brown* aravellv. sandv. wood.
Clay, black, sandv. aravellv. wood Chios
Gravel, fine to med.. sandv. slltv. somewhat clavev.
Sand, fine to coarse, some fine gravel, some silt.
Gravtt, fine to med .j and sand, med. to coarse; some fineto very fine sand.
—
QROUNOWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— MRS _
BORING CAVE IN __
FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA Refer to DiagramCASING USED: TYPE ——
DIAMETER
LENGTH
SCREEN LENGTH& SLOT SIZE ——
HT. ABOVE GROUND
0000818
Boring No. LI ienc
,
•
If ——• BoringI Depthr1
.x
prom
Fso
55
60
75
-0
90
95
105
133
136
1—
To
55
60
75
85
90
95
105
133
136
140
Project No.
Date
No. Blows last 12"No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of last
Sand, fine to coarse; and gravel fine to med; some fineto v fine sand.
Gravel, fine to v. coarse (1/2"); and sand, med; some v.fine sand and silt.
Gravel, med. to coarse, sandy, silty, clayey. Gravel becomesfiner with depth.
Clay, grey, sand, silty, gravelly, Gravel decreases withdepth.
Clay, grey, v. sandy; sandstone fragments (top of "rock"?)
Clay, grey, tough, sticky, plastic, somewhat sandy.
Clay. arev. sandv. siltv: Freaucnt sandstone fraamentsr fineto very fine grained.
•
Sandstone, grey, fine to v, fine grained, silty.
Shale, dark arev. somewhat siltv.
Sandstone, grey, fine to v. fine, silty.
—
0000819
US3SELEVATION WITH LOCK
8lt>.\
7*3BEDROCK TOT
\1.8
,
I*
, .
5
J
/ 05. •;
n'
•
i
.0
».T.
I.• 1i
^V\ *
»>»* "
Xt*-»X*
* *,
•"••.*.>'.»'.'Vi?%j:>i*, **;;;>*«•«
GROUND SURFACE' ,fX»vk*> x>'*^'•i% •
v1 ^,+»
J*», »
.v;'*•N*OA•» .
1
^ —— « 3/4" HOLE CONSTfHYDRAULIC ROTARY
- ——— 4*GALV. STEEL GAS
^ —— NATIVE SOILS AND
-, —— NEAT CEfclCNT GROi
^ , 3 7/8" OPEN HOLE (^^ BY AIR ROTARY
DATE CONSTRUCTED
TI ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND
WELL
AUG. 1963
WESTERN
20225
0000820
rEnvironmental Data Inc.
SHEET
CLIENT
PROJECT
DATE
OF
Grand Trunk Western Railroad
2Q22
PERMIT NO. 1402-322-413
PROJECT On-Site Hvdroqeloqical StudyLOCATION Calhoun County. Emmet Township
Stearns Drilling, Hollow Stem AugerKleinfelt A Sons. Hydraulic rotary
TECHNICIAN Pierce A Swanson
BORING NO. 7 and 7A
SURFACE SLEV.
HOLE PLUGGED WITH cement grout, hentonlta
BORING LOCATION
drift wells)bedrock)
Sec. 5 T25, R7W(Refer to location map
Well 7 is 11.4 ft. north of 7A
ROD%&^OM
0
5
9
29
INGTH
TO
5
9
29
46
and/or cuttings. NO BLOWS LAST iNO. BLOWS 3rd 6NO. BLOWS 2nd 6NO. BLOWS Ht 81DEPTH OF TEST
Gravel, fine to med: and sand, fine to coarse, silty.
Clay, brown and black, sandy, gravelly.
Gravel, fine to med .. and sand, fine to coarse, somewhatsilty.
as above, but gravel becoming coarser and s»nd more abundant.Split spoon sample at 29 feet: Sand, fine to coarse andgravel fine to coarse some silt. Split spoon sample at 40feet: Gravel fine to med., sandy, fine to med.Split spoon sample at 45 feet: As above, but gravel rangesto coarse.
2 IN
N.
N.
N
GROUNOWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS _
BORING CAVE IN __
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA Refer to DiagramCASING USED: TYPE ——
DIAMETER
LENGTH _
SCREEN LENGTH& SLOT SIZE ——
HT. ABOVE GROUND
00908*f
rBoring No. Client
Project No
Date
BoringDepth
From
46
55
101
115
To
55
101
115
120
No. Blows last 12"No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of T««t
Clay, grey, very sandy, gravelly (fine to med); fragmentsof qrev shale and sandstone, somewhat plastic.Split spoon sample at 47.5 feet: Clay, grey, hard, siltvocc. small (1/8") pebble.
Sandstone, grey, fine to very fine, silty, clayey,(Interval from 61-75 contains gravel?)
Shale, dark grey.
Sandstone, grey, fine to v. fine grained
v-
•
0000822
usesELEVATION
v^
•CAP WITH LOCK
9.8
W.T.
t
3.9'
GROUND SURFACE
3 HOLE
2 GALV. CASING
NATIVE SOILS AND BENTONITE
VOLCLAY BENTONITE PELLETS( 3 TO 3 FEET)
JOHNSON "WATER MARK SUPER"STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINT10- SLOT, 36" OPENINGS
DATE CONSTRUCTED _1
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No._I_
AUG. 1983 20229
0000823
usesELEVATION CAP WITH LOCK
77ZaCDROCK TOP
752.Q
,
,2
1
\ ,m
" * * • ? *
.a
^
i
L
•
.s
'^w.t
1.r 'i
»\7:(fc<
•\X• *••*.'Vi*.1 *>**ii* ~•V
1.
.*.. • v
GROUND SURFACE
X
^ \t '»*»•
t *-,"«^•i"'., *»x
!»\
A1i
^ —— « 3/4" MOLE CONSTRHYDRAULIC ROTARY
- ——— 4" GALV. STtEL CASl
^ — NATIVE SOILS AND
^ — NEAT CEMENT GROU
^. ——— -3 7/8" OPEN HOLE C^^ 3Y AIR ROTARY
DATE CONSTRUCTED
LENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL I** ""••
AUG. 1983 20229
0000821
Environmental Data Inc.
SHEET____ OF ____
CLIENT Grand Trunk Western Railroad
PROJECT NO.20225______________
DATE ____________________
PERMIT NO. 1402-822-413___________
PROJECT On-Site Hvdrogelogical Study
LOCATION Calhoun County. Emmet TownshipStearns Drilling, Hollow Stem AugerKleinfelt & Sons. Hydraulic rotary
TECHNICIAN Pierre t Swanson
BORING NO. 8 and 8A
SURFACE ELEV.
HOLE PLUGGED WITH cement groutr
BORING LOCATION
(drift wells)[bedrock)
Sec. 5 T2S, R7W(Refer to location man
Well 8 is 4.9 ft. north of 3A
and/or cuttings. NO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN
m°PROM
0
5
TO
5
18
j 18 22
22 24
24 42
NO. BLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO. BLOWS 2nd 6 IN.
NO. SLOWS TSt 6 IN,
DEPTH Of T6ST
Gravel, fine to med.
Sand, brown, fine to v. f1ne;s1ltv. elavey: snnw aravel .fine. Split spoon sample at 18 feet; Sand, brown, fine tov. fine, very clayey and silty.
Clay, brown, silty, sandy; some gravel, fine.
Gravel, coarse to clay, grey, very poorly sorted.
Clay, grey to gravel, fine. Poorly sorted. Sollt sooonsample at 26 feet: Sand fine to coarse very slltv, clayeysome fine gravel.
—
——
-
GROUNDWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS -
BORING CAVE IN ——
FT.
.FT.
.FT.
,FT.
WELL DATA Refer to DiagramCASING USED: TYPE ——
DIAMETER
LENGTH _
SCREEN LENGTH& SLOT SIZE ——
HT. ABOVE GROUND
0000825
• Boring No. __a Client
Project No.
Date
BoringDepth
From
42
60
70
87
* 1 ————1 901( *'
|104IT*120
v ———
V^ ———
**
'
w
:
u
To
60
70
87
90
95
104
120
130
No. Blows last 12"No. Blows 3rd 6"No. Blows 2nd 6"No. Blows 1st 6"Depth of T««c
Clay, dark grey, plastic, somewhat sandy, somewhat gravelly.
Clay, as above, but with fragments of sandstone and shale.
Clay, grey, v. sticky, plastic, sandy.
Sandstone (sample mixed with gravel, sand and clay.)Fracture at 87 feet-- lost some fluid.
SUts tone, grey, some fine sand.
Sandstone, grey, fine to v. fine grained.
Shale, dark grey.^
Sandstone, greytf1ne to v, ffne grained.
—— —— ——
—
-
——
I 0000826
usesEUEVATIOM
8 3^.30
531.9
CAP WITH LOCK
S/7,9
8/2.3
J
1
1
3
f,y
.
/
••m
/,fc
1
1
9'
•
•
V. o
1
ww.r
,*• v» '
»\*. **>>i •**'jj%:• »1 ••»*»1 .>»N' ,*•»•• %,» •
»*!•*4
, * *
:X•*• •;".»'.•• •'_•_«
^B
•94• <• •
BUj
"-••
»'•• *\< •« •
^/
% '
'V••*5!LX, «*• ^
%0
»•«*
l.»-M"..• »'•"?•%^H
r-
GROUND Si.
- 9" HOLE
*. ——— 2" GALV. CAJ
^- — NATIVE SOU
^- —— VOLCLAY 9E( 3
1 ———— JOHNSON "*STAINLESS10 • SLOT . 3
3 TO 3 FEET)
DATE CONSTRUCTED J:
^r
i0000827
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No. _£__
AUG. 1983 20229
usssELEVATION- WITH LOCK
746BEDROCK TOP
7J7.1/-
1
1
9V
.
•
f2-1'
' '
19.5
1 *
— ^pp——
» r.
.*'
t.i£5
-:v
.«,, w*;•i»N•*••«*>*/I•*»1 •
»(
J'
i\* *
ut1 "V*
t '»*I1.", »4?
•'»,
;*>»*i\^&
X
GROUND SURFACE
<+> —— S 3/4" HOLE CONST?HYDRAULIC ROTARY
———— 4"GACV. STEEL GAS
^ — NATIVE SOILS ANO
^~— NEAT CEMENT OROl
^—— — 3 7/8" OPEN HOLE (BY AIR ROTARY
DATE
1ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No, •' '••.
0000828
I
Environmental Data Inc.f NvM<MMMwrMjcmn5T»«MaiM«fftvMpiow* rtrcwwnn
SHEET
CLIENT
PROJECT
DATE
OF
Grand Trunk Western Railroad
2Q2?c
PERMIT NO. 1402*822-413
PROJECT
LOCATION
Qn-Site Hydrogelogical Study
Calhoun County. Emmet TownshipStearns Drilling, Hollow Stem Auger
gnuiPMPMT Kleinfelt A Sons. Hydraulic rotary
TECHNICIAN Pierce & Swanson_____________
SORING NO. -
SURFACE ELEV.
9 and 9A
HOLE PLUGGED WITH cement arnut.
BORING LOCATION
drift we l ls )bedrock)
Sec. 5 T25, R7W(Refer to location map)
Well <t is 11.6 ft northeast of 9A
and/or cuttings.
im?PROM
0
5
12/
TO
5
12
45
Clay, red to arev. siltv. sandv. oravellv.
MO. BLOWS LAST 12 IN
NO. SLOWS 3rd 6 IN.
NO SLOWS 2nd « tN.
NO BLOWS tst 6 tN
DEPTH of TEST
Gravel, fine to med; and sand, med to coarse:some fine sand.
Sandstone, grey, fine to v.fine grained, soft at surfacebut beconing hard with depth.
Sn11t Sooon Samoles:
15 f MI t: Sand And «Anri«f-nn». blue arev. v. fine to cnar«@.
20 fe«t: Sandstone, grey. v. fine to fine. soft.28 fe€t:s11tstone.qrev. friable, occ. oebble ofsandstone as above. —
-
GROUNOWATER
ENCOUNTERED AT
AFTER COMPLETION
AFTER ———— HRS -
BORING CAVE IN __
FT.
.FT.
.FT.
.FT.
WELL DATA Refer to DiagramCASING USED: TYPE ——
DIAMETER.
LENGTHSCREEN LENGTH& SLOT SIZE ——
HT. ABOVE GROUND —
0000829
US6SELEVATION
321.8
//
3.1
'CAP WITH LOCK
WT.
l.O
'*>1
*«
GROUND SURFACE
9 HOLE
2 GALV. CASING
NATIVE SOILS AND BENTONITE
VOLCLAY BENTONITE PELLETS(3 TO 5 FEET)
JOHNSON "WATER MARK SUPER"STAINLESS STEEL DRIVE POINT10- SLOT, 36" OPENINGS
DATE CONSTRUCTED "' c •*•
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL No '
AUG. 20225
0000830
ELEVATION
827.1
BEDROCK TO*
1 i
8-1
WITH LOCK
2-1
m.r.
&
GROUND SURFACE
ti,i* 3/4" HOLE CONSTRUCTED 3YHYDRAULIC WTARY
rrea. CASINO
NATIVE SOILS AND BENTONITE
NEAT CEMCNT GROUT
3 7/9" OPEN HOLE CONSTRUCTED9Y AIR ROTARY
DATE CONSTRUCTED
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA INC.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
WELL NO. ?-•]
AUG. 1983 20223
0000831