IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)

October 2014

ianacgorg

Transition background13 bull  In March 2014 NTIA 13ndash Announced intention to transition stewardship

of IANA functions13ndash Asked ICANN to convene global stakeholders

to develop a proposal to transition the current role played by NTIA13

bull  ICANN-initiated community process resulted in creation of IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)13

213

ICG

313

ALAC

ASO

ccNSO

GAC

GNSO

gTLD registries

ICCBASIS

IAB

IETF

ISOC

NRO

RSSAC

SSAC

ICANN board liaison

IANA staff liaison

ICG

413

ALAC

ASO

ccNSO

GAC

GNSO

gTLD registries

ICCBASIS

IAB

IETF

ISOC

NRO

RSSAC

SSAC

ICANN board liaison

IANA staff liaison

CoordinateLiaise

AssessAssemble

Inform

No proposal development

Focus of transition13 bull  IANA functions currently specified in NTIA

contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash  Internet numbers registry management13

bull  Stewardship (not policy development etc)13

513

Transition proposal development

613

RIRcommunities

IETFcommunity

Naming CWG

Community proposal elements13 bull  IANA functions category and community use13bull  Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13

bull  Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull  Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks

legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13

bull  How NTIA criteria were met13bull  Community process and consensus level13

713

Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13

ICG13Communities13

813

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

Transition background13 bull  In March 2014 NTIA 13ndash Announced intention to transition stewardship

of IANA functions13ndash Asked ICANN to convene global stakeholders

to develop a proposal to transition the current role played by NTIA13

bull  ICANN-initiated community process resulted in creation of IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)13

213

ICG

313

ALAC

ASO

ccNSO

GAC

GNSO

gTLD registries

ICCBASIS

IAB

IETF

ISOC

NRO

RSSAC

SSAC

ICANN board liaison

IANA staff liaison

ICG

413

ALAC

ASO

ccNSO

GAC

GNSO

gTLD registries

ICCBASIS

IAB

IETF

ISOC

NRO

RSSAC

SSAC

ICANN board liaison

IANA staff liaison

CoordinateLiaise

AssessAssemble

Inform

No proposal development

Focus of transition13 bull  IANA functions currently specified in NTIA

contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash  Internet numbers registry management13

bull  Stewardship (not policy development etc)13

513

Transition proposal development

613

RIRcommunities

IETFcommunity

Naming CWG

Community proposal elements13 bull  IANA functions category and community use13bull  Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13

bull  Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull  Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks

legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13

bull  How NTIA criteria were met13bull  Community process and consensus level13

713

Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13

ICG13Communities13

813

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

ICG

313

ALAC

ASO

ccNSO

GAC

GNSO

gTLD registries

ICCBASIS

IAB

IETF

ISOC

NRO

RSSAC

SSAC

ICANN board liaison

IANA staff liaison

ICG

413

ALAC

ASO

ccNSO

GAC

GNSO

gTLD registries

ICCBASIS

IAB

IETF

ISOC

NRO

RSSAC

SSAC

ICANN board liaison

IANA staff liaison

CoordinateLiaise

AssessAssemble

Inform

No proposal development

Focus of transition13 bull  IANA functions currently specified in NTIA

contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash  Internet numbers registry management13

bull  Stewardship (not policy development etc)13

513

Transition proposal development

613

RIRcommunities

IETFcommunity

Naming CWG

Community proposal elements13 bull  IANA functions category and community use13bull  Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13

bull  Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull  Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks

legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13

bull  How NTIA criteria were met13bull  Community process and consensus level13

713

Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13

ICG13Communities13

813

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

ICG

413

ALAC

ASO

ccNSO

GAC

GNSO

gTLD registries

ICCBASIS

IAB

IETF

ISOC

NRO

RSSAC

SSAC

ICANN board liaison

IANA staff liaison

CoordinateLiaise

AssessAssemble

Inform

No proposal development

Focus of transition13 bull  IANA functions currently specified in NTIA

contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash  Internet numbers registry management13

bull  Stewardship (not policy development etc)13

513

Transition proposal development

613

RIRcommunities

IETFcommunity

Naming CWG

Community proposal elements13 bull  IANA functions category and community use13bull  Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13

bull  Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull  Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks

legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13

bull  How NTIA criteria were met13bull  Community process and consensus level13

713

Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13

ICG13Communities13

813

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

Focus of transition13 bull  IANA functions currently specified in NTIA

contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash  Internet numbers registry management13

bull  Stewardship (not policy development etc)13

513

Transition proposal development

613

RIRcommunities

IETFcommunity

Naming CWG

Community proposal elements13 bull  IANA functions category and community use13bull  Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13

bull  Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull  Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks

legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13

bull  How NTIA criteria were met13bull  Community process and consensus level13

713

Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13

ICG13Communities13

813

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

Transition proposal development

613

RIRcommunities

IETFcommunity

Naming CWG

Community proposal elements13 bull  IANA functions category and community use13bull  Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13

bull  Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull  Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks

legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13

bull  How NTIA criteria were met13bull  Community process and consensus level13

713

Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13

ICG13Communities13

813

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

Community proposal elements13 bull  IANA functions category and community use13bull  Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13

bull  Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull  Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks

legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13

bull  How NTIA criteria were met13bull  Community process and consensus level13

713

Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13

ICG13Communities13

813

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13

ICG13Communities13

813

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13

ICG13Communities13

NTIA13913

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

1  Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments

accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash  Inclusiveness of community process13

1013

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13

2  Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability

(under discussion)13

1113

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

ICG

Steps towards a single proposal13 3  Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash  ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13

1213

ICG

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

Questions heard this week13 bull  Is the ICG having a joint meeting in mid-November with the Names

CCWG1313bull  Has the target deadline for operational communities to submit

proposals to the ICG been changed from January 15 to January January 3113

13bull  What is the relationship between the ICG and the ICANN

accountability CCWG1313bull  Does the final transition plan need to cover every aspect covered by

the existing NTIA contract Is the transition broader or narrower than what is covered by the current contract13

13bull  Does the ICANN board have to approve the final transition plan Will

they be able to modify the plan before it gets sent to NTIA131313

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

References13 bull  FAQ

httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13

bull  ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13

13bull  RFP

httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13

13bull  Timeline13

ndash  Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13

ndash  Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13

13bull  Mailing list archive13

ndash  httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 1413

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

IANA Transition IETF

Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigil Security

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

2

IETF and IANA Roles

IETF community(policy)

IAB(oversight)

IANA(implementation)

ProtocolParameters

bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values

bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF

bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

3

IAB

IETF IANA

Nomcom

Contract

Oversight

How Do IETF and IANA Work Together

bull Agreements specify roles

bull Accountability

bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes

bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to agreement processes

bull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are made when needsissues arise no USG involvement

Oversight

Agreement

Nomcom

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

4

IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters

bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion

bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model

bull No change to roles of organisations

bull No new organisation needed

5

Please Participatebull The time to affect this part of the plan is now

bull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part of the transition please share them

bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan

bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml

IANA13 Stewardship13 Transi2on13

Update13 from13 Internet13 Number13 Community13

NRO13 approach13

bull  Regional13 number13 communi2es13 have13 exis2ng13 regional13 mee2ngs13 and13 policy13 processes13

bull  Each13 RIR13 has13 launched13 an13 open13 regional13 process13 for13 IANA13 oversight13 transi2on13 planning13

bull  The13 NRO13 has13 proposed13 an13 open13 process13 to13 consolidate13 regional13 plansviews13 into13 a13 single13 RFP13 response13 13 ndash  The13 ldquoCRISP13 Teamrdquo13 (more13 later)13

bull  hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

APNIC13

bull  Discussion13 session13 was13 held13 during13 APNIC13 3813 in13 Brisbane13 1713 September13 201413 ndash ldquoStrawmanrdquo13 proposal13 adopted13 by13 community13

bull  Mailing13 list13 ianaxferapnicnet13 bull  Website13 hJpwwwapnicnetianaxfer13 13

ARIN13

bull  Discussion13 session13 was13 held13 during13 ARIN13 3413 in13 Bal2more13 October13 201413 ndash Discussion13 of13 process13 and13 issues13 ndash Proposal13 for13 community13 wide13 survey13 ndash  hJpswwwarinnetannouncements201420141013html13 13

bull  Mailing13 list13 iana-shy‐transi2onarinnet13

LACNIC13

bull  Process13 lead13 by13 313 community13 members13 appointed13 by13 the13 Board13 13

bull  Sessions13 scheduled13 for13 LACNIC13 2213 in13 San2ago13 October13 201413 ndash Panel13 session13 for13 informa2on13 ndash  Interac2ve13 session13 for13 community13 discussion13

bull  Mailing13 list13 internet-shy‐govlacnicnet13 bull  Website13 hJpwwwlacnicnetweblacniciana-shy‐transicion13

RIPE13 NCC13

bull  Very13 close13 community13 informa2on13 13 feedback13 since13 the13 NTIA13 announcement13

bull  Coopera2on13 WG13 is13 focal13 point13 in13 RIPE13 13 ndash Discussion13 kickoff13 RIPE13 6813 Warsaw13 1513 May13 hJpwwwripenetripegroupswgcoop13

bull  Drab13 statement13 of13 guiding13 principles13 for13 an13 RIR13 proposal13 released13 on13 913 October13 ndash Discussion13 13 feedback13 at13 RIPE13 6913 3-shy‐713 Nov13 hJpwwwripenetiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13

AFRINIC13 bull  First13 consulta2on13 took13 place13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐20AISrsquo201513 mee2ng13 in13 Djibou213 ndash  Resulted13 into13 the13 crea2on13 of13 a13 mailing13 list13 for13 discussion13 on13 a13 proposal13 So13 far13 mailing13 list13 used13 for13 informa2on13 sharing13 (ianaoversightafrinicnet)13 13 Limited13 substan2ve13 contribu2on13 so13 far13 S2ll13 about13 a13 month13 of13 discussion13 on13 the13 mailing13 list13

ndash A13 dedicated13 informa2on13 page13 on13 our13 web13 site13 13 hJpwwwafrinicnetencommunityiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13 13

bull  A13 second13 roundtable13 will13 be13 organised13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐2113

CRISP13 Team13

bull  Consolidated13 RIR13 IANA13 Stewardship13 Proposal13 Team13 ndash  Responsible13 for13 producing13 the13 Number13 community13 response13 to13 the13 ICG13 RFP13

hJpswwwicannorgnewsannouncement-shy‐2014-shy‐09-shy‐09-shy‐en13 13

bull  1513 members13 313 from13 each13 RIR13 region13 ndash  (213 Community13 reps13 +13 113 RIR13 staff13 rep)13 x13 513

bull  Fully13 open13 process13 accessible13 from13 NRO13 website13 and13 mailing13 list13

hJpswwwnronetnro-shy‐and-shy‐internet-shy‐governanceiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

NRO13 approach13

bull  Regional13 number13 communi2es13 have13 exis2ng13 regional13 mee2ngs13 and13 policy13 processes13

bull  Each13 RIR13 has13 launched13 an13 open13 regional13 process13 for13 IANA13 oversight13 transi2on13 planning13

bull  The13 NRO13 has13 proposed13 an13 open13 process13 to13 consolidate13 regional13 plansviews13 into13 a13 single13 RFP13 response13 13 ndash  The13 ldquoCRISP13 Teamrdquo13 (more13 later)13

bull  hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

APNIC13

bull  Discussion13 session13 was13 held13 during13 APNIC13 3813 in13 Brisbane13 1713 September13 201413 ndash ldquoStrawmanrdquo13 proposal13 adopted13 by13 community13

bull  Mailing13 list13 ianaxferapnicnet13 bull  Website13 hJpwwwapnicnetianaxfer13 13

ARIN13

bull  Discussion13 session13 was13 held13 during13 ARIN13 3413 in13 Bal2more13 October13 201413 ndash Discussion13 of13 process13 and13 issues13 ndash Proposal13 for13 community13 wide13 survey13 ndash  hJpswwwarinnetannouncements201420141013html13 13

bull  Mailing13 list13 iana-shy‐transi2onarinnet13

LACNIC13

bull  Process13 lead13 by13 313 community13 members13 appointed13 by13 the13 Board13 13

bull  Sessions13 scheduled13 for13 LACNIC13 2213 in13 San2ago13 October13 201413 ndash Panel13 session13 for13 informa2on13 ndash  Interac2ve13 session13 for13 community13 discussion13

bull  Mailing13 list13 internet-shy‐govlacnicnet13 bull  Website13 hJpwwwlacnicnetweblacniciana-shy‐transicion13

RIPE13 NCC13

bull  Very13 close13 community13 informa2on13 13 feedback13 since13 the13 NTIA13 announcement13

bull  Coopera2on13 WG13 is13 focal13 point13 in13 RIPE13 13 ndash Discussion13 kickoff13 RIPE13 6813 Warsaw13 1513 May13 hJpwwwripenetripegroupswgcoop13

bull  Drab13 statement13 of13 guiding13 principles13 for13 an13 RIR13 proposal13 released13 on13 913 October13 ndash Discussion13 13 feedback13 at13 RIPE13 6913 3-shy‐713 Nov13 hJpwwwripenetiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13

AFRINIC13 bull  First13 consulta2on13 took13 place13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐20AISrsquo201513 mee2ng13 in13 Djibou213 ndash  Resulted13 into13 the13 crea2on13 of13 a13 mailing13 list13 for13 discussion13 on13 a13 proposal13 So13 far13 mailing13 list13 used13 for13 informa2on13 sharing13 (ianaoversightafrinicnet)13 13 Limited13 substan2ve13 contribu2on13 so13 far13 S2ll13 about13 a13 month13 of13 discussion13 on13 the13 mailing13 list13

ndash A13 dedicated13 informa2on13 page13 on13 our13 web13 site13 13 hJpwwwafrinicnetencommunityiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13 13

bull  A13 second13 roundtable13 will13 be13 organised13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐2113

CRISP13 Team13

bull  Consolidated13 RIR13 IANA13 Stewardship13 Proposal13 Team13 ndash  Responsible13 for13 producing13 the13 Number13 community13 response13 to13 the13 ICG13 RFP13

hJpswwwicannorgnewsannouncement-shy‐2014-shy‐09-shy‐09-shy‐en13 13

bull  1513 members13 313 from13 each13 RIR13 region13 ndash  (213 Community13 reps13 +13 113 RIR13 staff13 rep)13 x13 513

bull  Fully13 open13 process13 accessible13 from13 NRO13 website13 and13 mailing13 list13

hJpswwwnronetnro-shy‐and-shy‐internet-shy‐governanceiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

APNIC13

bull  Discussion13 session13 was13 held13 during13 APNIC13 3813 in13 Brisbane13 1713 September13 201413 ndash ldquoStrawmanrdquo13 proposal13 adopted13 by13 community13

bull  Mailing13 list13 ianaxferapnicnet13 bull  Website13 hJpwwwapnicnetianaxfer13 13

ARIN13

bull  Discussion13 session13 was13 held13 during13 ARIN13 3413 in13 Bal2more13 October13 201413 ndash Discussion13 of13 process13 and13 issues13 ndash Proposal13 for13 community13 wide13 survey13 ndash  hJpswwwarinnetannouncements201420141013html13 13

bull  Mailing13 list13 iana-shy‐transi2onarinnet13

LACNIC13

bull  Process13 lead13 by13 313 community13 members13 appointed13 by13 the13 Board13 13

bull  Sessions13 scheduled13 for13 LACNIC13 2213 in13 San2ago13 October13 201413 ndash Panel13 session13 for13 informa2on13 ndash  Interac2ve13 session13 for13 community13 discussion13

bull  Mailing13 list13 internet-shy‐govlacnicnet13 bull  Website13 hJpwwwlacnicnetweblacniciana-shy‐transicion13

RIPE13 NCC13

bull  Very13 close13 community13 informa2on13 13 feedback13 since13 the13 NTIA13 announcement13

bull  Coopera2on13 WG13 is13 focal13 point13 in13 RIPE13 13 ndash Discussion13 kickoff13 RIPE13 6813 Warsaw13 1513 May13 hJpwwwripenetripegroupswgcoop13

bull  Drab13 statement13 of13 guiding13 principles13 for13 an13 RIR13 proposal13 released13 on13 913 October13 ndash Discussion13 13 feedback13 at13 RIPE13 6913 3-shy‐713 Nov13 hJpwwwripenetiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13

AFRINIC13 bull  First13 consulta2on13 took13 place13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐20AISrsquo201513 mee2ng13 in13 Djibou213 ndash  Resulted13 into13 the13 crea2on13 of13 a13 mailing13 list13 for13 discussion13 on13 a13 proposal13 So13 far13 mailing13 list13 used13 for13 informa2on13 sharing13 (ianaoversightafrinicnet)13 13 Limited13 substan2ve13 contribu2on13 so13 far13 S2ll13 about13 a13 month13 of13 discussion13 on13 the13 mailing13 list13

ndash A13 dedicated13 informa2on13 page13 on13 our13 web13 site13 13 hJpwwwafrinicnetencommunityiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13 13

bull  A13 second13 roundtable13 will13 be13 organised13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐2113

CRISP13 Team13

bull  Consolidated13 RIR13 IANA13 Stewardship13 Proposal13 Team13 ndash  Responsible13 for13 producing13 the13 Number13 community13 response13 to13 the13 ICG13 RFP13

hJpswwwicannorgnewsannouncement-shy‐2014-shy‐09-shy‐09-shy‐en13 13

bull  1513 members13 313 from13 each13 RIR13 region13 ndash  (213 Community13 reps13 +13 113 RIR13 staff13 rep)13 x13 513

bull  Fully13 open13 process13 accessible13 from13 NRO13 website13 and13 mailing13 list13

hJpswwwnronetnro-shy‐and-shy‐internet-shy‐governanceiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

ARIN13

bull  Discussion13 session13 was13 held13 during13 ARIN13 3413 in13 Bal2more13 October13 201413 ndash Discussion13 of13 process13 and13 issues13 ndash Proposal13 for13 community13 wide13 survey13 ndash  hJpswwwarinnetannouncements201420141013html13 13

bull  Mailing13 list13 iana-shy‐transi2onarinnet13

LACNIC13

bull  Process13 lead13 by13 313 community13 members13 appointed13 by13 the13 Board13 13

bull  Sessions13 scheduled13 for13 LACNIC13 2213 in13 San2ago13 October13 201413 ndash Panel13 session13 for13 informa2on13 ndash  Interac2ve13 session13 for13 community13 discussion13

bull  Mailing13 list13 internet-shy‐govlacnicnet13 bull  Website13 hJpwwwlacnicnetweblacniciana-shy‐transicion13

RIPE13 NCC13

bull  Very13 close13 community13 informa2on13 13 feedback13 since13 the13 NTIA13 announcement13

bull  Coopera2on13 WG13 is13 focal13 point13 in13 RIPE13 13 ndash Discussion13 kickoff13 RIPE13 6813 Warsaw13 1513 May13 hJpwwwripenetripegroupswgcoop13

bull  Drab13 statement13 of13 guiding13 principles13 for13 an13 RIR13 proposal13 released13 on13 913 October13 ndash Discussion13 13 feedback13 at13 RIPE13 6913 3-shy‐713 Nov13 hJpwwwripenetiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13

AFRINIC13 bull  First13 consulta2on13 took13 place13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐20AISrsquo201513 mee2ng13 in13 Djibou213 ndash  Resulted13 into13 the13 crea2on13 of13 a13 mailing13 list13 for13 discussion13 on13 a13 proposal13 So13 far13 mailing13 list13 used13 for13 informa2on13 sharing13 (ianaoversightafrinicnet)13 13 Limited13 substan2ve13 contribu2on13 so13 far13 S2ll13 about13 a13 month13 of13 discussion13 on13 the13 mailing13 list13

ndash A13 dedicated13 informa2on13 page13 on13 our13 web13 site13 13 hJpwwwafrinicnetencommunityiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13 13

bull  A13 second13 roundtable13 will13 be13 organised13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐2113

CRISP13 Team13

bull  Consolidated13 RIR13 IANA13 Stewardship13 Proposal13 Team13 ndash  Responsible13 for13 producing13 the13 Number13 community13 response13 to13 the13 ICG13 RFP13

hJpswwwicannorgnewsannouncement-shy‐2014-shy‐09-shy‐09-shy‐en13 13

bull  1513 members13 313 from13 each13 RIR13 region13 ndash  (213 Community13 reps13 +13 113 RIR13 staff13 rep)13 x13 513

bull  Fully13 open13 process13 accessible13 from13 NRO13 website13 and13 mailing13 list13

hJpswwwnronetnro-shy‐and-shy‐internet-shy‐governanceiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

LACNIC13

bull  Process13 lead13 by13 313 community13 members13 appointed13 by13 the13 Board13 13

bull  Sessions13 scheduled13 for13 LACNIC13 2213 in13 San2ago13 October13 201413 ndash Panel13 session13 for13 informa2on13 ndash  Interac2ve13 session13 for13 community13 discussion13

bull  Mailing13 list13 internet-shy‐govlacnicnet13 bull  Website13 hJpwwwlacnicnetweblacniciana-shy‐transicion13

RIPE13 NCC13

bull  Very13 close13 community13 informa2on13 13 feedback13 since13 the13 NTIA13 announcement13

bull  Coopera2on13 WG13 is13 focal13 point13 in13 RIPE13 13 ndash Discussion13 kickoff13 RIPE13 6813 Warsaw13 1513 May13 hJpwwwripenetripegroupswgcoop13

bull  Drab13 statement13 of13 guiding13 principles13 for13 an13 RIR13 proposal13 released13 on13 913 October13 ndash Discussion13 13 feedback13 at13 RIPE13 6913 3-shy‐713 Nov13 hJpwwwripenetiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13

AFRINIC13 bull  First13 consulta2on13 took13 place13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐20AISrsquo201513 mee2ng13 in13 Djibou213 ndash  Resulted13 into13 the13 crea2on13 of13 a13 mailing13 list13 for13 discussion13 on13 a13 proposal13 So13 far13 mailing13 list13 used13 for13 informa2on13 sharing13 (ianaoversightafrinicnet)13 13 Limited13 substan2ve13 contribu2on13 so13 far13 S2ll13 about13 a13 month13 of13 discussion13 on13 the13 mailing13 list13

ndash A13 dedicated13 informa2on13 page13 on13 our13 web13 site13 13 hJpwwwafrinicnetencommunityiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13 13

bull  A13 second13 roundtable13 will13 be13 organised13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐2113

CRISP13 Team13

bull  Consolidated13 RIR13 IANA13 Stewardship13 Proposal13 Team13 ndash  Responsible13 for13 producing13 the13 Number13 community13 response13 to13 the13 ICG13 RFP13

hJpswwwicannorgnewsannouncement-shy‐2014-shy‐09-shy‐09-shy‐en13 13

bull  1513 members13 313 from13 each13 RIR13 region13 ndash  (213 Community13 reps13 +13 113 RIR13 staff13 rep)13 x13 513

bull  Fully13 open13 process13 accessible13 from13 NRO13 website13 and13 mailing13 list13

hJpswwwnronetnro-shy‐and-shy‐internet-shy‐governanceiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

RIPE13 NCC13

bull  Very13 close13 community13 informa2on13 13 feedback13 since13 the13 NTIA13 announcement13

bull  Coopera2on13 WG13 is13 focal13 point13 in13 RIPE13 13 ndash Discussion13 kickoff13 RIPE13 6813 Warsaw13 1513 May13 hJpwwwripenetripegroupswgcoop13

bull  Drab13 statement13 of13 guiding13 principles13 for13 an13 RIR13 proposal13 released13 on13 913 October13 ndash Discussion13 13 feedback13 at13 RIPE13 6913 3-shy‐713 Nov13 hJpwwwripenetiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13

AFRINIC13 bull  First13 consulta2on13 took13 place13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐20AISrsquo201513 mee2ng13 in13 Djibou213 ndash  Resulted13 into13 the13 crea2on13 of13 a13 mailing13 list13 for13 discussion13 on13 a13 proposal13 So13 far13 mailing13 list13 used13 for13 informa2on13 sharing13 (ianaoversightafrinicnet)13 13 Limited13 substan2ve13 contribu2on13 so13 far13 S2ll13 about13 a13 month13 of13 discussion13 on13 the13 mailing13 list13

ndash A13 dedicated13 informa2on13 page13 on13 our13 web13 site13 13 hJpwwwafrinicnetencommunityiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13 13

bull  A13 second13 roundtable13 will13 be13 organised13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐2113

CRISP13 Team13

bull  Consolidated13 RIR13 IANA13 Stewardship13 Proposal13 Team13 ndash  Responsible13 for13 producing13 the13 Number13 community13 response13 to13 the13 ICG13 RFP13

hJpswwwicannorgnewsannouncement-shy‐2014-shy‐09-shy‐09-shy‐en13 13

bull  1513 members13 313 from13 each13 RIR13 region13 ndash  (213 Community13 reps13 +13 113 RIR13 staff13 rep)13 x13 513

bull  Fully13 open13 process13 accessible13 from13 NRO13 website13 and13 mailing13 list13

hJpswwwnronetnro-shy‐and-shy‐internet-shy‐governanceiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

AFRINIC13 bull  First13 consulta2on13 took13 place13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐20AISrsquo201513 mee2ng13 in13 Djibou213 ndash  Resulted13 into13 the13 crea2on13 of13 a13 mailing13 list13 for13 discussion13 on13 a13 proposal13 So13 far13 mailing13 list13 used13 for13 informa2on13 sharing13 (ianaoversightafrinicnet)13 13 Limited13 substan2ve13 contribu2on13 so13 far13 S2ll13 about13 a13 month13 of13 discussion13 on13 the13 mailing13 list13

ndash A13 dedicated13 informa2on13 page13 on13 our13 web13 site13 13 hJpwwwafrinicnetencommunityiana-shy‐oversight-shy‐transi2on13 13

bull  A13 second13 roundtable13 will13 be13 organised13 during13 AFRINIC-shy‐2113

CRISP13 Team13

bull  Consolidated13 RIR13 IANA13 Stewardship13 Proposal13 Team13 ndash  Responsible13 for13 producing13 the13 Number13 community13 response13 to13 the13 ICG13 RFP13

hJpswwwicannorgnewsannouncement-shy‐2014-shy‐09-shy‐09-shy‐en13 13

bull  1513 members13 313 from13 each13 RIR13 region13 ndash  (213 Community13 reps13 +13 113 RIR13 staff13 rep)13 x13 513

bull  Fully13 open13 process13 accessible13 from13 NRO13 website13 and13 mailing13 list13

hJpswwwnronetnro-shy‐and-shy‐internet-shy‐governanceiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

CRISP13 Team13

bull  Consolidated13 RIR13 IANA13 Stewardship13 Proposal13 Team13 ndash  Responsible13 for13 producing13 the13 Number13 community13 response13 to13 the13 ICG13 RFP13

hJpswwwicannorgnewsannouncement-shy‐2014-shy‐09-shy‐09-shy‐en13 13

bull  1513 members13 313 from13 each13 RIR13 region13 ndash  (213 Community13 reps13 +13 113 RIR13 staff13 rep)13 x13 513

bull  Fully13 open13 process13 accessible13 from13 NRO13 website13 and13 mailing13 list13

hJpswwwnronetnro-shy‐and-shy‐internet-shy‐governanceiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13

Ques2ons13

hJpswwwnronetiana-shy‐oversight13 13

13