iasc
DESCRIPTION
gender marker. IASC. improving humanitarian effectiveness. Addressing the gender challenge- Part II: IASC Gender Marker Results & Lessons Learned. IASC CAP Sub Working Group. Sex matters. Tsunami: 4 female for every 1 male death. MEASURING THE ISSUE: THE HUMANITARIAN LEXICON. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Addressing the gender challenge- Part II:
IASC Gender Marker
Results & Lessons Learned
IASCCAP Sub Working Group
Sex mattersTsunami: 4 female for every 1 male death
2
MEASURING THE ISSUE:THE HUMANITARIAN LEXICON
DisplacedReturneesHouseholdsCommunitiesVulnerablesChildren below 5Survivors…
IASC Gender Marker CodingTo measure/track inclusion of gender and GBVTo enable/to build capacity of humanitarian teams to build the
capacity of humanitarian teams to design projects that respond to the distinct needs of ALL beneficiaries
Gender Code Description
Gender Code 0(UNDP code 0)
Gender is not reflected anywhere in the project sheet i.e gender-blind
Gender Code 1(UNDO code 1)
The project includes gender equality in a limited way
Gender Code 2aGender Mainstreaming(UNDP code 2)
A gender analysis is included in the project’s needs assessment. This gender analysis is reflected in the project’s activities and outcomes.
Gender Code 2bTargeted Actions(UNDP code 3)
The project’s principal purpose is to advance gender equality.
Overview – GM to Date GM piloted 2009, 12 countries in 2010
20 countries 2012. Fully integrated into • 16 CAPs 2012• 5 Pooled Funds (PF)/ER Pakistan
Support from GenCap Advisers• Capacity development in-country• HQ review process
RESULTS: CAP 2010-2012 (Baseline)Kenya, Niger, oPt, Somalia, Yemen, Zimbabwe
RESULTS: CAP 2010-2012• Kenya, Niger, oPt, Somalia, Yemen, Zimbabwe
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
% o
f p
roje
cts
0 1 2a 2b
Codes
Change in Gender Marker Coding 2010 to 2012 in Six Countries
2010
2011
2012
RESULTS: Clusters/16 CAPs in 2012
RESULTS – GM 16 CAP Countries 2012
Key Emerging Issues…From the abstract to the practicalSpace for dialogue and engagementDonor engagement
Gender = women?
Sex-and-age disaggregated data (SADD)Collection and use?
….Key Emerging Issues & Going forwardTargeting the ‘right’ people for training
(designers/implementers, national actors)
Gender minimum standards/commitmentsGM as a ‘Criteria’ - quality of projects
Consistency in coding: more engagement by designers & clusters
….Key Emerging Issues & Going forward (ctd)Distinguishing between 2a & 2b projects
15% target on 2b (Protection & Multi-sector only)? More funding towards 2b/esp. GBV projects
From design to monitoring implementation: South Sudan/Yemen/Zimbabwe = initial steps MYRs = entry point
THANK YOU