identifying of humpback whale and · 2013. 2. 28. · stickleback school at surface. overcast day,...

1
www.gulfwatchalaska.org THE LONG-TERM MONITORING PROGRAM OF THE EXXON VALDEZ OIL SPILL TRUSTEE COUNCIL Identifying of humpback whale and marine bird prey using a submersible digital video camera Jan Straley University of Alaska Southeast - Sitka [email protected] Non-invasive. Rapid deployment and retrieval minutes. Low cost - <$500 Observe natural behavior. Minimal disruption of ship- board activities. Monitoring trawl performance. Documenting rockfish barotrauma. Outreach. Many more. We deployed cameras (GoPro Hero 2 TM ) from fishing reels when foraging whales and birds were encountered during line-transect surveys. Are low cost video cameras a practical method for identifying subsurface prey? Advantages: Conclusions: Mixed results light and visibility were the greatest challenge. The ability to rapidly deploy and retrieve the camera did not disrupt surveys. Great for benthic observations. Other Applications Limitations: Light. Turbidity snow effect. Poor image quality. Depth - 197 feet. Tow speed - 1 knot. Alters behavior with artificial light. Not real-time. Large files~2GB for 20min. The recommendations and general content presented in this poster do not necessarily represent the views or official position of the Department of Commerce, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the National Marine Fisheries Service. John Moran Auke Bay Laboratories [email protected] Objective: Develop a system that could quickly identify subsurface prey during ship-based marine mammal and seabird surveys. What are they eating? What Species? Herring feeding at 75 feet. Natural light, August, SEAK. Gaddid and brittle stars in PWS under artificial light. Diseased YOY herring in PWS under artificial light. Anemone in PWS under artificial light during December Boat hull in mid-PWS during October under partly cloudy skies. Visibility is limited. Stickleback school at surface. Overcast day, late afternoon, August. Under artificial lights some zooplankton species were attracted to artificial lights. YOY herring in PWS seemed to avoid the camera at night. Their rapid movement created blurred images at low light levels. In about ½ our attempts catching prey worked better, but it took a lot more time. Juvenile pollock? From Joe Orsi

Upload: others

Post on 19-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Identifying of humpback whale and · 2013. 2. 28. · Stickleback school at surface. Overcast day, late afternoon, August. Under artificial lights some zooplankton species were attracted

www.gulfwatchalaska.org THE LONG-TERM MONITORING PROGRAM OF THE EXXON VALDEZ OIL SPILL TRUSTEE COUNCIL

Identifying of humpback whale and

marine bird prey using

a submersible digital video camera

Jan Straley

University of Alaska

Southeast - Sitka

[email protected]

• Non-invasive.

• Rapid deployment and

retrieval minutes.

• Low cost - <$500

• Observe natural behavior.

• Minimal disruption of ship-

board activities.

• Monitoring trawl

performance.

• Documenting

rockfish

barotrauma.

• Outreach.

• Many more.

We deployed cameras (GoPro

Hero 2TM) from fishing reels

when foraging whales and

birds were encountered

during line-transect surveys.

Are low cost video cameras a practical method for identifying subsurface prey?

Advantages:

Conclusions:

Mixed results – light and visibility

were the greatest challenge.

The ability to rapidly deploy and

retrieve the camera did not disrupt

surveys.

Great for benthic observations.

Other Applications

Limitations:

• Light.

• Turbidity snow effect.

• Poor image quality.

• Depth - 197 feet.

• Tow speed - 1 knot.

• Alters behavior with

artificial light.

• Not real-time.

• Large files~2GB for 20min.

The recommendations and general content presented in this poster do not necessarily represent the views or official position of the Department of Commerce, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the National Marine Fisheries Service.

John Moran

Auke Bay Laboratories

[email protected]

Objective:

Develop a system that

could quickly identify

subsurface prey during

ship-based marine

mammal and seabird

surveys. What are they eating? What Species?

Herring feeding at

75 feet. Natural light,

August, SEAK.

Gaddid and brittle stars in

PWS under artificial light.

Diseased YOY herring in

PWS under artificial light.

Anemone in PWS under

artificial light during

December

Boat hull in mid-PWS

during October under partly

cloudy skies.

Visibility is limited.

Stickleback school at

surface. Overcast day,

late afternoon, August.

Under artificial lights

some zooplankton

species were attracted to

artificial lights.

YOY herring in PWS seemed to

avoid the camera at night. Their

rapid movement created blurred

images at low light levels.

In about ½ our attempts catching prey worked

better, but it took a lot more time.

Juvenile pollock?

From Joe Orsi