The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the

opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any

use that may be made of the information contained therein.

CZECH REPUBLIC - NATIONAL SITUATION

BIOGAS PRODUCTION AND BIOGAS POTENTIALS

FROM RESIDUES OF THE EUROPEAN

FOOD AND BEVERAGE INDUSTRY

IEE-Project

FABbiogas

Table of contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1

2 Table 1: Production of selected types of wastes according to WMIS and CSO in 2011. . 2

3 Table 3: Production of waste materials from primary agricultural and gardening

production ............................................................................................................................. 5

4 Task 1 ............................................................................................................................ 9

4.1 Maps showing national waste streams of different FAB industry branches .............. 9

4.1.1 Waste materials from dairy industry ................................................................. 9

4.1.2 Waste materials from meat and poultry ...........................................................10

4.1.3 Waste materials from fruit and vegetable processing ......................................10

4.1.4 Waste materials from sugar industry ...............................................................11

4.1.5 Waste materials from bakeries and candy .......................................................11

4.1.6 Waste materials from beverages .....................................................................12

4.1.7 Industrial BSs, processing of biodegradable industrial wastes (BIWs) .............18

4.1.8 Waste water treatment plants - WWTPs ..........................................................22

4.1.9 Municipal BSs .................................................................................................22

5 References ....................................................................................................................24

1 /27

FABBIOGAS: NATIONAL REPORT CZECH REPUBLIC

1 Introduction

Biogas and biogas systems are energy resources with great benefits for the protection and

development of the environment. Despite the fact that biogas has not been able to drive

fossil fuels out of their dominating position in the energy market, it has, in contrast to the

fossil fuels, almost unlimited perspectives of future use. Biogas systems, in all available

configurations, operate as fully renewable energy resources that both transform and utilize

solar energy. All technologies, even the auxiliary ones, can be implemented within these

systems as environmentally friendly processes, including situations, for example, when you

deal with processing sulfur-rich substrates.

The widely deployed implementations of anaerobic procedures for wastewater treatment,

which have spread as a useful technology since the first quarter of the 20th century, have

introduced the term "biogas". Technical personnel have, until the 1960s or 1970s, used other

synonyms for this gas, either "sludge gas" or "waste treatment gas". It is possible to

summarize that the general term of "biogas" has been assigned by the contemporary

technical science exclusively to a gaseous product of anaerobic methane fermentation of

organic substances, which is sometimes also called anaerobic digestion, biomethanization or

biogasification. The term "biogas" generally refers to a gaseous mix of methane and carbon

dioxide. The total sum of CH4 and CO

2 in a gaseous product of well-prospering methanogenic

organisms approaches the value of 100% in volume, always with significant prevalence of

the methane component. Since such an "ideal" biogas is not always available in real life,

there is a wide variety of additional gases that biogas can contain. These could be residues

of air gases (N2, O

2, Ar), partially consumed acidogenesis products (H

2, excess of CO

2) or

other marginal and trace substances from previous or simultaneous reactions of the organic

matter (for example H2S or higher carbohydrates and their derivatives, mostly oxide- or

sulfur-based).

2 /27

Exploration of organic waste substrate resources in agriculture and food processing

industry

Biodegradable waste (BW), i.e. waste material that is subject to aerobic and anaerobic

decomposition, grows in significance as a residual biomass resource. Biodegradable wastes

notably include municipal BWs, agricultural, gardening and forest BWs, BWs from food

processing industry, paper and cellulose industries, timber processing, leather and textile

industries, paper and wooden packaging, waste treatment and waste water treatment sludge.

Table 1 presents aggregate production of these wastes in 2011, divided into the groups

according to the Wastes Catalog and also the amounts of BWs in the individual groups. Data

on waste production have been acquired from two independent sources. The first one is the

Waste Management Information System (WMIS) operated by the Waste Management

Center, which is a part of the T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute. The WMIS database

contains information on the production and management of wastes in the Czech Republic

collected between 2008 and 2011 from the creators of wastes and the so-called authorized

bodies by means of District Authorities as stipulated in the Act No. 125/1997 Coll. on Waste

Management and relevant implementing regulations. The Czech Statistical Office (CSO) is

the other source of information on waste production. Statistical information of the CSO is

based on the results acquired through processing of the Annual Waste Statement. A survey

of businesses yielded results on industrial wastes and municipalities provided information on

municipal wastes. Production of communal waste has been surveyed by means of a selected

set of 1010 municipalities from the whole territory of the Czech Republic. The remaining data

for the whole Czech Republic have been calculated.

2 Table 1: Production of selected types of wastes according to WMIS and CSO in 2011.

Production of wastes

from selected groups of

wastes

BW

Percentage

Amount (t)

According to

WMIS

Amount (t)

According to CSO

Total BW Total BW

02000000 Waste materials

from primary agricultural

and gardening production,

woodland management, fish

92.2 6,392,639 5,894,348 10,665,159 9,833,277

3 /27

farming and food production

and processing

03000000 Waste materials

from timber processing 81.3 820,616 667,404 775,045 630,112

04000000 Waste materials

from leather and textile

industries

38.5 53,433 20,593 57,849 22,272

15000000 Waste materials

from packaging, sorbents,

cleaning textiles, filter

materials and protection

textiles not specified

anywhere else

27.7 212,131 58,693 133,384 36,947

17000000 Construction and

demolition waste materials 0.3 8,482,248 26,079 11,339,746 34,019

19000000 Waste materials

from waste treatment

facilities, from waste

neutralization facilities, from

waste water treatment

plants and from water

treatment facilities.

26.4 1,468,372 387,149 2,147,647 566,979

20000000 Municipal waste

materials and similar

wastes from businesses,

offices, industrial facilities,

including separately

collected components of

these waste materials

46.9 3,975,952 1,866,458 1,676,059 786,072

Total quantity of waste

materials in the report 21,405,391 8,920,724 26,794,889 11,909,678

4 /27

The largest percentage of BWs is taken up by waste materials from primary agricultural and

gardening productions, which represent almost 80% of all BWs according to the CSO and

about 60% according to WMIS. Actual amounts of these waste materials, more specifically of

the supplementary agricultural production, are greater by an order of magnitude then implied

by the statistics. Just the production of moist livestock excrements, estimated from the

number of the kept animals (according to the CSO) and the average production per head,

has yielded in the Czech Republic over 27 million tons per year or

25 million tons per year according to a more realistic estimate, in the past three years. The

above-presented numbers describe theoretical potential only, i.e. the total amounts of all

livestock excrements produced in the Czech Republic. Available potential for processing of

these waste materials by means of anaerobic fermentation is estimated at about 30% of the

theoretical amount. A large percentage of agricultural waste materials are utilized by other

methods, usually within the agricultural field and close to the places of their origination.

Nevertheless, agricultural wastes (secondary agricultural production, more specifically), and

especially livestock excrements, are the most important potential source of substrate for

anaerobic fermentation. See Table 3 for the amounts of waste materials from primary

agricultural and gardening production.

Table 2: Numbers of livestock and estimated amounts of excrements in the Czech Republic

2012

animals

(pcs) excrements (t)

Total cattle 1,353,685 20,131,730

thereof cows 551,225 11,850,714

Total pigs 1,578,827 6,046,801

thereof sows 100,157 1,141,516

Total poultry 20,691,30

8 1,075,143

thereof hens 5,354,575 510,379

TOTAL 27,253,674

5 /27

3 Table 3: Production of waste materials from primary agricultural and gardening

production

Production of selected

types of waste

materials from

primary agricultural

and gardening

production in 2001

BW

Percentage

Amount (tones) BW (t)

According

to WMIS

According

to CSO

According

to WMIS

According

to CSO

02010100 Washing and

cleaning sludge 50 20,321 45,869 10,161 22,935

02010200 Animal tissue 100 36,674 60,012 36,674 60,012

02010300 Plant tissue 100 254,620 409,640 254,620 409,640

02010600 Animal

droppings, urine and dung

(including straw fouling),

fluid waste collected

separately and processed

beyond the place of its

origin

100 4,702,740 8,806,511 4,702,740 8,806,511

Total 5,014,355 9,322,032 5,004,195 9,299,098

Waste materials from food processing industry represent another significant source of

residual biomass suitable for anaerobic fermentation - about 0.75 million tons of these BWs

come into existence each year. Table 4 presents an overview of the production of these

waste materials.

6 /27

Table 4: Food processing industry waste material production

Production of selected

types of waste materials

from the food processing

industry in 2001

BW

Percentage

Amount (tones) BW (t)

According

to WMIS

According

to CSO

According

to WMIS

According

to CSO

02020000 Waste materials from the production and processing of meat, fish and other

foodstuffs of animal origin

02020100 Washing and

cleaning sludge 50 15,881 66,226 7,941 33,113

02020200 Animal tissue 100 89,591 90,262 89,591 90,262

02020300 Raw material

unsuited for consumption or

other use

80 38,066 31,257 30,453 25,006

02020400 Sludge’s from

fluid waste processing at

the place of its origin

100 13,664 6,618 13,664 6,618

Total selection from

02020000 157,202 194,363 141,649 154,999

02030000 Waste materials from the production and processing of fruits, vegetables, cereals,

edible oils, cocoa, coffee and tobacco, tobacco industry wastes

02030100 Sludge’s from

washing, cleaning, peeling,

centrifuging and separation

60 144,448 140,308 86,669 84,185

02030400 Raw material

unsuited for consumption or

other use

50 28,401 27,510 14,201 13,755

02030500 Sludge’s from

fluid waste processing at

the place of its origin

80 1,675 1,585 1,340 1268

Total selection from

02030000 174,524 169,403 102,210 99,208

02040000 Waste materials from sugar industry

7 /27

02040100 Soil from beets

cleaning and washing 20 11,830 50,944 2,366 10,189

02040300 Sludge’s from

fluid waste processing at

the place of its origin

80 364,651 - 291,721 -

Total selection from

02040000 376,481 50,944 294,087 10,189

02050000 Waste materials from dairy industry

02050100 Raw material

unsuited for consumption or

other use

80 56,826 84,196 45,461 67,357

02050200 Sludge’s from

fluid waste processing at

the place of its origin

80 20,260 669 16,208 535

Total selection from

02050000 77,086 84,865 61,669 67,892

02060000 Waste materials from bakeries and candy production

02060100 Raw material

unsuited for consumption or

other use

100 4,695 6,132 4,695 6,132

02060300 Sludge’s from

fluid waste processing at

the place of its origin

80 2,088 1,530 1,670 1224

Total selection from

02060000 6,783 7,662 6,365 7,356

02070000 Waste materials from the production of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages

(except for coffee, tea and cocoa)

02070100 Waste materials

from washing, cleaning and

mechanical processing of

80 202,695 240,903 162,156 192,722

8 /27

the ingredients

02070200 Distillation

residue from spirituous

liquor production

100 50,843 47,363 50,843 47,363

02070400 Raw material

unsuited for consumption or

other use

50 13,866 1,511 6,933 756

02070500 Sludge’s from

fluid waste processing at

the place of its origin

80 29,907 89,368 23,926 71,494

Total selection from

02070000 297,312 379,145 243,858 312,335

Total 1,119,338 886,382 849,838 651,979

9 /27

4 Task 1

4.1 Maps showing national waste streams of different FAB industry

branches

4.1.1 Waste materials from dairy industry

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?mid=zwoKsqfqjCQM.krjcEncje_IY&cid=m

p&cv=y2R-5eV2vns.en

10 /27

4.1.2 Waste materials from meat and poultry

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?mid=zwoKsqfqjCQM.k0xy9nZ3u1LY

4.1.3 Waste materials from fruit and vegetable processing

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?mid=zwoKsqfqjCQM.k-

cpvYPJCJMc&cid=mp&cv=y2R-5eV2vns.en

11 /27

4.1.4 Waste materials from sugar industry

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?mid=zwoKsqfqjCQM.kdCJeOHcyJiI&cid=

mp&cv=y2R-5eV2vns.en

4.1.5 Waste materials from bakeries and candy

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?mid=zwoKsqfqjCQM.kySBjLwWG_gM&ci

d=mp&cv=GBQBS8Wbpr4.en

12 /27

4.1.6 Waste materials from beverages

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?mid=zwoKsqfqjCQM.kC7wBTf9gvWk&cid

=mp&cv=GBQBS8Wbpr4.en

Large amounts of BWs also originate during the timber felling and processing and also in the

paper, textile and leather industries. These waste materials are mostly unsuitable for

anaerobic fermentation, though, due to their characteristics. Another group of waste

materials with a significant content of BWs suitable for anaerobic fermentation consists of

biologically non-stabilized sludge from waste water treatment plants (WWTP) and waste

materials from waste treatment and neutralization facilities (see Table 5).

13 /27

Table 5: Production of selected types of waste materials from waste treatment and neutralization

facilities, from WWTP and other water treatment facilities

Production of

selected types

of waste

materials from

waste

treatment,

waste

neutralization

facilities,

WWTP and

other water

treatment

facilities in

2001

BW

Percentage

Amount (tones) BW (t)

According

to WMIS

According

to CSO

According

to WMIS

According

to CSO

19050000 Waste materials from waste composting

19050300

Unsuitable quality

compost

90 600 - 540 -

19080000 Waste materials from waste water treatment plants not listed elsewhere

19080300 Mixes

of fats and oils

from separators

90 4,832 3,243 4,349 2,919

19080400

Sludge’s from

industrial waste

water treatment

80 100,097 104,012 80,078 83,210

Total selection

from 19080000 104,929 107,255 84,427 86,129

19090000 Waste materials from drinking water treatment and industrial water treatment

19090100 Solid

waste from trash

60 1,054 1,480 632 888

14 /27

Biodegradable municipal wastes (BMWs) also feature a significant potential for future

material and energy use. BMWs represent about 40% of the mixed municipal waste. The

Waste Management Plan of the Czech Republic stipulates gradual lowering of the MBW

landfill storage volumes in agreement with the Council Directive 1999/30/EC on Landfill of

Waste, which requires annual lowering of the organic waste amounts put to landfills. These

legal measures should contribute to an increase in BMWs utilization in future. Kitchen waste

materials from dining facilities and restaurants are especially suitable for anaerobic

fermentation due to the high contents of fats. For production values of selected BMWs see

Table 6.

screens and filters

19090200

Sludge’s from

water clarification

40 174,260 135,208 69,704 54,083

Total selection

from 19090000 175,314 136,688 70,336 54,971

Total 280,842 243,943 155,303 141,100

15 /27

Table 6: Production of selected types of municipal waste materials and similar waste materials from

businesses, offices and industry

Production of selected

types of municipal

waste materials and

similar waste

materials from

businesses, offices and

industry including

separately collected

components of these

waste materials in

2001

BW

Percentage

Amount (tones) BW (t)

According

to WMIS

According

to CSO

According

to WMIS

According

to CSO

20010000 Waste materials acquired through separated collection

20010800 Organic

compostable kitchen

waste (including frying

oils and kitchen waste

from dining facilities and

restaurants)

100 57,614 10,978 57,614 10,978

20010900 Oil and/or fat 20 3,114 2,743 623 549

Total selection from

20010000 60,728 13,721 58,237 11,527

20020000 Waste materials from greenery maintenance in gardens and parks (including

graveyards)

20020100 Compostable

waste 100 96,572 33,488 96,572 33,488

20020300 Other non-

compostable waste 20 93,863 47,714 18,773 9,543

Total selection from

20020000 190,435 81,202 115,345 43,031

20030000 Other municipal waste

20030100 Mixed

municipal waste 40 2,478,365 533,087 991,346 213,235

16 /27

20030200 Market place

waste 80 14,576 2,152 11,661 1,722

20030400 Sludge’s from

septic tanks and/or

cesspits, chemical toilet

waste

80 550,688 557,156 440,550 445,725

Total selection from

20030000 3,043,629 1,092,395 1,443,557 660,682

Total 3,294,792 1,187,318 1,617,139 715,240

Situation in the development of biogas stations in the Czech Republic

Production of biogas as a renewable source of energy has been developing in the Czech

Republic mostly in the form of withdrawing biogas from the bodies of municipal waste

landfills. A large source of biogas also consists in WWTPs with anaerobic level that process

treatment sludge since the renewable energy statistics include, under the biogas production,

also the landfill gas production and sludge gas production from WWTPs. Some biogas

stations (BS) had been commissioned as waste water processing facilities and the biogas

production from these facilities is included in the WWTP item. Electricity production from

biogas produced in biogas stations in the Czech Republic (see Table 8) was 1,264,273 MWh

in 2012. The activity of biogas stations processing industrial and communal biowastes is

negligible within this energy sum, see biogas production in Table 7.

Table 7: Production of biogas in the Czech Republic in 2012 according to the Ministry of

Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic

Biogas source Number of

respondents

Number of

locations

(WWTPs,

landfills,

BSs)

Biogas consumption

(m3)

Municipal WWTPs 44 94 60,326,737

Industrial WWTPs 13 14 10,406,354

17 /27

* excludes new BSs that have not been through trial operation and biogas stations that are listed as

waste water treatment facilities

Table 8: Development of electric power production from biogas (biogas stations)

Year Number of

respondents

Number of

electricity

production

facilities*

Installed

electric

output

total (kW)

Electricity

production

(MWh)

Internal

consumption

incl. losses

(MWh)

Supply

into

network

(MWh)

Direct

supplies

(MWh)

2003 5 13 1,547 6,519 2,678 3,501 341

2004 7 18 2,066 7,130 2,503 4,405 222

2005 7 17 1,954 8,243 2,163 5,614 466

2006 13 31 6,109 19,211 10,367 6,953 1,891

2007 19 47 10,923 43,248 10,722 30,881 1,645

2008 47 99 28,946 91,580 15,608 72,240 3,732

2009 84 151 53,579 262,622 32,485 227,374 2,764

2010 112 196 74,990 447,424 49,646 392,861 4,917

2011 179 318 132,983 724,802 84,148 634,822 5,832

2012 303 563 254,167 1,264,273 132,782 1,124,456 7,034

* includes new BSs that have not been through trial operation

Biogas Production development from biogas stations has been focused in recent years on

agricultural BSs that process supplementary agricultural products and also purposefully

grown biomass. There are about two dozen BSs processing industrial and municipal

Biogas stations* 303 317 628,824,719

Landfill gas 25 61 66,136,898

Total 385 486 765,694,708

18 /27

biodegradable waste. It has been announced that more than 563 biogas stations will be

brought into operation and many biogas stations are nearly finished or in the commissioning

process, see the difference between tables 7 and 8. This development has been supported

by the favorable purchasing price of electric power from agricultural biogas stations and the

investment support from EU structural funds, specifically from the Environment,

Entrepreneurship and Innovations operational programs and the Countryside Development

Program. Biogas station development in the Czech Republic has been the chief priority of the

EKO-energy program established by the Ministry of Industry and Trade. Since the planned

installed output of biogas stations, and of all renewable energy resources, has been

achieved in 2013 (including the BSs that were issued licenses of the MIT in the course of

2012 and at the beginning of 2013) the investment support for construction and operation

support in the form of advantageous electric power purchasing price will be virtually

abolished for newly built biogas stations in 2014.

4.1.7 Industrial BSs, processing of biodegradable industrial wastes (BIWs)

The anaerobic technology features certain specific characteristics when applied to cleaning

of industrial waste waters. The fundamental prerequisite is, naturally, a sufficiently high

concentration of easily biodegradable organic compounds in waste waters. It is also

necessary to take into account that some industrial waste waters are virtually single-

substrate environments; this means that their biological decomposition will require the

presence of additional nutrients and mineral compounds required for the growth of the

microorganisms and these additional components will have to be supplied by means of other

suitable waste water. It is also necessary to consider, experimentally if possible, the need of

maintaining the buffer capacity and the possibility of the inhibitory compounds origination

(ammonium, sulfane), etc. Besides technological aspects it is also necessary to realize that

business subjects are far less supported by the state in the field of waste water treatment

then the municipal sphere. Practical experience has shown that companies opt for anaerobic

cleaning, or more precisely pre-cleaning, of waste waters because of two reasons:

1 A) they can no more release waste water directly into the water body (high residual

contamination after aerobic cleaning or low water contents of the water body) since

they would have to pay large fees for residual treatment.

2 B) need for waste water pre-cleaning to levels required by local sewage regulations

before releasing it into public sewage

Biogas production and its power production utilization are mostly of secondary interest to

these producers. There are currently 13 functional industrial biogas stations - waste water

19 /27

treatment plants with biogas production. Dobrovice Sugar Mill is the largest biogas producer -

it processes waste water from sugar and alcohol production by means of the anaerobic

technology; the smallest annual production (about 6,000 m3) of biogas has been reported by

Perri Crisps Třemošná, which processes potato chips production waste. Waste-water

treatment and the connected biogas production in the sugar-industry are rather seasonal -

only during the harvest period. Irregular production in the course of the year and the related

waste water production and biogas production can be registered also in case of beer

production and canning industry. TIBA, a.s., Dvůr Králové is a special case since this

company processes municipal water besides its own industrial waste water. Due to the rather

great difficulty and exceptional nature of industrial waste water treatment it has been decided

to include it into the "Industrial Biogas Stations, WWTP with Biogas Production" category.

This category features quite a small proportion of biogas stations - WWTPs that use biogas

for electric power generation. The main reason consists in the seasonality of the biogas

production (sugar mills, canneries, beer production) and in the high contents of sulfane in the

biogas acquired during the yeast factory waste water processing. Their operators therefore

prefer not to publish the installed capacity since this could result in misinterpretation of the

biogas, electricity and heat production. They enter only electrical energy production, if

available, into the statistical reports, see data in Table 9 (there are 13 industrial BSs and only

10 of them generate electricity). Table 10 lists industrial BSs in operation. Another specific

feature of these facilities consists in the fact that they are registered as biogas stations one

year and as WWTPs a year later. And this is not the end: these facilities also frequently

change their owners or operators; at the beginning they are owned as biogas stations by

manufacturing corporations, then as WWTPs by municipalities and later as WWTPs by water

authorities.

20 /27

Table 9: Development of electricity production from biogas (industrial biogas stations - waste

water treatment plants)

Year

Number of

electricity

production

facilities

Installed

electric

output

total (kW)

Electrici

ty

producti

on

(MWh)

Internal

consum

ption

incl.

losses

(MWh)

Supply

into

network

(MWh)

Direct

supplies

(MWh)

2003 4 886 1,691 1,387 305 0

2004 6 998 2,001 1,638 364 0

2005 5 976 2,869 2,368 501 0

2006 4 940 2,070 1,663 407 0

2007 7 1,006 3,292 2,474 818 0

2008 9 1,029 4,016 3,176 840 0

2009 9 1,499 3,616 2,717 899 0

2010 9 1,349 4,971 4,295 676 0

2011 9 1,414 6,924 6,290 634 0

2012 10 1,785 8,517 8,074 443 0

21 /27

Table 10: Industrial BSs, data from 2012

BS Substrate

Electricity

output

Heat

output

[kWe] [kWt]

INTEGRO a.s.

KLADRUBY

Waste materials from animal production,

production and processing of meat and

agricultural products, green raw materials

310 360

REPROGEN

Biogas Station

Agricultural waste materials from livestock

breeding and green raw materials 800 760

Radegast,

Nošovice Beer production waste materials 0 0

Tereos TTD

Dobrovice

Alcohol and sugar production waste

materials

Tereos TTD

České Meziříčí Sugar production waste materials

Vladislav

Biogas Station Glue production waste materials 300 400

TIBA a.s. Dvůr

K. nad L.

Sewage waters, textile industry waste

materials 0 0

Pavlice Sawmill Sawmill production wastes, soft sawdust +

agricultural raw materials 999 1,281

Yeast factory,

Kolín Yeast production 190 95

Krušovice

Brewery Beer production waste materials 0 0

MARS Poříčí n

S. Candy production 0 0

Pika Bzenec Cannery 0 0

22 /27

4.1.8 Waste water treatment plants - WWTPs

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?mid=zNEz3VnMEk8A.kgjL7_mVyNeY

It is impossible to expect growth of more then a few to a few dozen percent in this source

group since large city agglomerations have already been equipped with this waste water

treatment technology and the WWTPs with anaerobic level are too expensive for small

municipalities. Co-processing in the growing numbers of agricultural BSs is a very significant

option for energy recovery from waste water organic pollution.

4.1.9 Municipal BSs

Reactor processing technologies for solid municipal waste and separately collected waste

materials (such as park greenery waste, wastes from catering services, paper, cardboard)

processing are rather promising these days. They face tough competition from solid

municipal waste incineration plants (SMWIP), though.

Perri Crisps,

Třemošná Potato chips production 0 0

23 /27

Anaerobic fermentation of solid municipal wastes (SMW) and their component -

biodegradable municipal wastes (BMW) is a promising method of their processing for many

municipal authorities. It is expected that cities with more then 50,000 inhabitants will operate

their own facilities which will, besides electrical power, heat and compost, produce also

residues designated for landfills or incinerators in the volume of 20 to 30% of the original

mixed municipal waste.

Table 11: Municipal BSs, data from 2012

BS Substrate

Electricity

output

Heat

output

[kWe] [kWt]

Kněžice Biogas

Station

Slaughterhouse waste, kitchen waste,

distillery slops, agricultural waste 330 405

ADOS Benešov -

Přibyšice Biodegradable municipal waste 994 904

Svojšín Biogas

Station

Agricultural raw materials +

biodegradable municipal waste 1,052 0

Úpice Biogas

Fermentation

Station

Biodegradable municipal waste 150 207

Vysoké Mýto

Fermentation

Station

Biodegradable municipal waste 320 394

Žďár nad Sázavou

Biogas Station Biodegradable municipal waste 600 608

BS - Jezbořice

Agricultural waste materials from

livestock breeding and green raw

materials, BMW

600 570

24 /27

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?mid=zNEz3VnMEk8A.kCxzzvpskxfk

5 References

PASTOREK, Z. – KÁRA, J. – JEVIČ, P.: Biomasa obnovitelný zdroj energie. Prague,

FCC PUBLIC s.r.o., 2004

PASTOREK, Z. et al.: Návrh programu podpory výroby a využití bioplynu a výstavby BPS

do roku 2010. Prague, VÚZT 2002. KÁRA, J. - PASTOREK, Z. - PŘIBYL, E.: Výroba a využití bioplynu v zemědělství, Published by

VÚZT, v.v.i. Prague 2007 as a part of a support program „9.F.g. Metodická činnost k podpoře

zemědělského poradenského systému Ministerstva zemědělství ČR.“

The Waste Management Plan of the Czech Republic,

http://www.env.cz/www/zamest.nsf/defc72941c223d62c12564b30064fdcc/2c7cb0f9ea5981ff

c1256b3c0048ada9?OpenDocument

STRAKA, F. – CRHA, J. – MUSILOVÁ, M.: Skládkový plyn – Reaktorový bioplyn

a skládkový plyn, rozdíly, podobnosti a minoritní složky těchto plynů. Odpady, 1999,

No. 2.

25 /27

VÁŇA, J.: Sdělení odboru odpadů MŽP ke specifikaci skupin kompostovatelných odpadů s

výjimkou kompostovatelných odpadů v komunálním odpadu podle přílohy č. 8 vyhlášky č.

383/2001 Sb., o podrobnostech nakládání s odpady. Sdělení 29, Věstník MŽP, 2003.

KOTOULOVÁ, Z., -.VÁŇA, J.: Příručka pro nakládání s komunálním bioodpadem. Edice „Na

pomoc praxi v odpadovém biohospodářství“ Svazek I. MŽP, ČEU, Prague, November 2001,

70 pages, http://www.biom.cz/soubory.shtml

SLEJŠKA, A. et al.: Realizační program pro biologicky rozložitelné odpady. MŽP 2003.

STRAKA, F. et al.: Bioplyn – příručka pro výuku, projekci a provoz bioplynových systémů. Říčany,

GAS s. r. o., 2003.

KAJAN, M – LHOTSKÝ, R.: Výroba a využití bioplynu v České republice, In. Výstavba a provoz

bioplynových stanic, sborník referátů z konference v Třeboni (October 19 - 20, 2006),

page 5 - 9

BERANOVSKY, J. – VOCHOČ, L.: Situace ve výrobě bioplynu v ČR a v EU, In. Výstavba a

provoz bioplynových stanic, sborník referátů z konference v Třeboni (October 19 – 20, 2006),

pages 12-17

Zpráva o plnění indikativního cíle výroby elektřiny z obnovitelných zdrojů za rok 2005 podle § 7 zákona č. 180/2005 Sb. o podpoře výroby elektřiny z obnovitelných zdrojů energie, MPO 2006, (This report was prepared by the Ministry of Industry and Trade in cooperation with the Ministry of the Environment and the Energy Regulatory Office.)