ieee 802.11-17/0186r4 - ieee standards association · web view“edmg trn subfield for cb...

September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

IEEE P802.11Wireless LANs

A compendium of motions related to the contents of the draft amendment for TGay

Date: 2017-09-14

Author:Name Company Address Phone email

Edward Au Huawei Technologies 303 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 400, Ottawa, ON, K2K 3J1

edward.ks.au@ huawei.com

Compendium of motions Edward Au (Huawei)

AbstractThis document summarizes all motions related to the contents of the draft amendment for TGay, including comment resolution for CC24.

September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

2017 January

Motion #143

Do you agree to insert the following in draft? “The 11ay specification shall enable BSS discovery through transmitted DMG Beacon frames based on: Setting the Quasi-omni TX subfield to one in transmitted DMG Beacon frames to indicate the potential for

discovery based on quasi-omni transmission Appending TRN-R subfields to transmitted DMG Beacon frames Transmit antenna training by an EDMG STA based on TRN-R subfields appended to a received DMG

Beacon frame that has the Quasi-omni TX subfield equal to one.”

Moved: Hiroyuki MotozukaSeconded: Claudio da Silva

Yes/No/Abstain: 17/0/7The motion is passed.

Motion #144

Do you agree to insert the following in draft? “The 11ay specification shall enable BSS discovery through Probe Request based on: Appending TRN-R subfields to a Probe Request frame transmitted with quasi-omni antenna pattern Transmit antenna training by an EDMG STA based on TRN-R subfields appended to a received Probe

Request frame transmitted with a quasi-omni antenna pattern.”


The motion is passed with unanimous consent.

Motion #145

Do you agree to add the following text into draft? “For an allocation that does not include the primary channel, its allocation information shall be completely and only included in the EDMG Extended Schedule element.”




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #146

Do you agree to add the following text into the draft? “A Scheduling Type subfield shall be added into each Channel Allocation field of the EDMG Extended Schedule element to indicate whether an allocation is based on incremental signaling or complete signaling.”



Motion #147

Do you agree to add the following into daft?

Moved: Assaf KascherSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #148

Do you agree to add the following into the draft? “For an EDMG SC PPDU, the Length field in the L-Header is set so that the spoofing error shall be smaller than one symbol block (512*Tc) and non-negative, where Spoofing error = (TXTIME calculated based on L-Header) – (TXTIME).”



Motion #149

Do you agree to add the following field ‘DCM SQPSK over two aggregated channels field (1 bit)’ in the EDMG-header-A for an EDMG SU PPDU to the draft? A value of 1 indicates that DCM SQPSK over two aggregated channels is applied. A value of 0 indicates that DCM SQPSK over two aggregated channels is not applied. Reserved if either TX or RX does not support DCM SQPSK over two aggregated channels.

Moved: Tao WuSeconded: Yan Xin



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #150

Do you agree to add to the draft? “EDMG TRN subfield for CB = 1, 2, 3, 4 and MIMO NSS = 1, 2, … 8, shall have a structure shown on slide #9 of 16/1636r0. The GaN/GbN sequence length is defined as N = 128 * CB. All sequences GaN/GbN are defined in the draft.

Moved: Alexander MaltsevSeconded: Rob Sun


Motion #151

Do you agree that (1) the AGC field currently defined for single-carrier and control mode EDMG PPDUs shall be removed and (2) the training field of EDMG PPDUs shall be defined as shown below for the single-carrier and control modes? In the proposed structure, the number of TRN sequences used for channel estimation (that is, transmitted with the same AWV as the preamble/data fields) (P) and for BF training (which may use different AWV settings depending on whether transmit or receive training is used) (M) in a TRN-Unit is configurable.

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Rob Sun


Motion #152

Do you agree to incorporate the additions to the BRP Request Field (slide 11 of 17/0007r1), EDMG Header A bits (slide 12 of 17/0007r1), Mandatory features (slide 13 of 17/0007r1), and Capabilities element (slides 14 and 15 of 17/0007r1) to the draft?

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Yan Xin



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #153

Do you agree to insert the following in the 11ay Draft? 11ay specification shall define EDMG SU PPDU aggregation.

Moved: Takenori SakamotoSeconded: Hiroyuki Motozuka


Motion #154

Do you agree with the EDMG A-PPDU formats shown in slides 3 and 5 of 11-17/0051r3 for 11ay SC mode?

Moved: Takenori SakamotoSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #155

Do you agree to add “Additional EDMG PPDU field” to the EDMG-Header-A?



Motion #156

Do you agree with the coding and modulation method shown in slide 7 of 11-17/0051r3 for EDMG-Header-A within the EDMG A-PPDU transmitted with the same bandwidth as the corresponding data field in 11ay SC mode?




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #157

Do you agree to include in draft the following? TXOP Owner may reduce the PPDU occupied channel width only when transmitting EDMG PPDU. A TXOP owner shall not increase the PPDU occupied channel width within the same TXOP.



Motion #158

Do you agree to apply cyclic extension of EDMG-CEF field as defined on slide #6 of 17/0149r2?



Motion #159

Do you agree to add the following text to the Draft? “If the Short SSW packet is transmitted during ISS and RSS and then SSW-Feedback frame and SSW-ACK frame are transmitted, SSW Feedback field within SSW-Feedback frame and SSW-ACK frame is interpreted as the figure in slide 4 of 17/0109r1. Sector Select subfield (6bits) is interpreted as CDOWN Select 1 subfield (6bits). DMG Antenna Select subfield (2bits) is interpreted as RF Chain Select subfield (2bits). Reserved bits (5bits) are interpreted as CDOWN Select 2 subfield (5bits).

Moved: SungJin ParkSeconded: JinMin Kim


Motion #160

Do you agree to add the following text into draft? “Short SSW frame can be transmitted by associated STAs in A-BFT for 11ay.”

Moved: JinMin KimSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #161

Do you agree to add the following text into draft? “If short SSW frame is transmitted in A-BFT, SSW slot time for short SSW frame is the same as 11ad.”



Motion #162

TBD Do you agree to add the signaling for multi-channel and multiple RX antenna SPSH using Optional Sub-elements in Directional Channel Quality Request/Report frame (shown on slides 6-7 of 17/0108r0) into the Draft?



Motion #163

Do you agree to add the following text to the 802.11ay draft? An EDMG STA may support hybrid precoding (defined as a combination of analog beamforming and digital

baseband precoding) for SU-MIMO. An EDMG STA may support hybrid precoding (defined as a combination of analog beamforming and digital

baseband precoding) for MU-MIMO.

Moved: Kome OteriSeconded: Rui Yang


Motion #164

Do you agree to instruct the editor to incorporate the text in document 11-16-1627r0 TX Masks into IEEE 802.11ay draft 0.1?




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #165

Do you agree to instruct the editor to incorporate the draft text in document 11-16-1626-00-EDMG Capabilities into IEEE 802.11ay draft 0.1, and edit the text as necessary to be compatible with the DMG Capabilities element in IEEE 802.11-2016?



Motion #166

To deal with asymmetric DMG antenna configurations, the 11ay specification shall define an enhanced SLS protocol that enables beamforming training between an AP or PCP and non-AP or non-PCP STAs that includes the following steps: adding TRN-R subfields to DMG Beacon frames transmitted in the BTI; beamforming training between the PCP/AP and non-PCP/non-AP STAs (as shown in slides 8-9 of

17/0067r1); scheduling of directional allocations in the DTI (as shown in slides 11-12 of 17/0067r1)

Moved: Alexander MaltsevSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #167

Do you agree that the spoofing error for EDMG control mode PPDUs shall be defined to be non-negative and less than or equal to 150ns, except between 611713 𝑇_𝑐 (approx. 347.56 μs) and 612351 𝑇_𝑐 (approx. 347.93 μs) and between 614401 𝑇_𝑐 (approx. 349.10 μs) and 617343 𝑇_𝑐 (approx. 350.76 μs) when the spoofing error shall be non-negative and less than or equal to 639 𝑇_𝑐 (approx. 364 ns) and 2943 𝑇_𝑐 (approx. 1.67 μs), respectively? Spoofing error is defined as (TXTIME calculated based on L-Header) – (TXTIME).



Motion #168

Do you agree to define in the draft, the 16 bits of address field within Short SSW frame to contain RA and TA AID fields? If the TA or RA is the AP itself, the TA or RA AID field should be filled with the 8 bits of the EDMG BSS AID. In case of ISS and Unicast, the Short SSW Feedback field should be replaced by the Short Scrambled BSSID(SS-BSSID) field.

Moved: Rob SunSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #169

Do you agree to add the following to the draft? The BSSID values are scrambled with the following formula before the calculation of SS-BSSID in the Short SSW packet:

scrambled i-th word = (i-th word + scramble pattern) mod 216,where each word is the part of the BSSID which is split by 16 bits, and + is integer addition.



Motion #170

Do you agree to add the following to the draft? Scramble patterns for SS-BSSID calculation are defined as follows:

o Scramble pattern = (0x5795 * seed) mod 215

The seed is the scrambler initialization in the PHY header of the Short SSW packet.

Moved: Rob SunSeconded: Yan Xin


Motion #171

Do you agree to add the following to the draft? The EDMG core capabilities shall contain NUC capabilities which indicate support of NUC and differentiate between NUC transmission and reception.

Moved: Dana CoichinaSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #172

Do you agree to add the following to the Draft? EDMG header-A and header-B shall have an indication to signal use of non-uniform constellation. The indication consists of a single bit in each header and rules of slide #5 of 17/0057r0 apply.

Moved: Dana CoichinaSeconded: Rob Sun



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #173

Do you agree with the EDMG-Header-A definition proposed in slide 7 of 17/0052r1?

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Alexander Maltsev


Motion #174

Do you agree to add the following capability information in the core capabilities field of the EDMG capabilities element regarding open loop precoding into the 11ay draft? Open Loop Precoding Supported field (1bit)




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

2017 March

Motion #178

Do you agree to perform input bits parsing over the spatial streams on the round robin manner with bits grouping and padding as shown on slides #8, 9 of 11-17-0211-01-00ay? Specification text is proposed in 11-17-0214-01-00ay 29 5 7 27 Encoding.

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Lei Huang


Motion #179

Do you agree to add the following to the draft: “The EDMG-TRN subfield for MIMO with NSS > 2 shall be defined as shown on slide #8 of 11-17-0212-01-00ay”? Specification text is proposed in 11-17-0213-00-00ay 29 9 3 26 9 TRN Subfield Definition.

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Assaf Kasher


Motion #180

Do you agree to instruct the editor to incorporate the draft text in the contribution 17/0189r0 into IEEE 802.11ay draft 0.2?

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Thomas Handte


Motion #181

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed changes on Measurement Request & Report elements as shown in IEEE 802.11-17/0215r2 into the next draft 11ay specification?

Moved: Lei HuangSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #182

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed changes on Spatial Sharing and Interference Mitigation as shown in IEEE 802.11-17/0217r3 into the next draft 11ay specification?

Moved: Lei HuangSeconded: Sang Kim


Motion #183

Do you agree that the text in contribution 17/0277r0 shall be incorporated into the next draft 11ay specification?



Motion #184




Motion #185

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed changes on Channel Measurement Feedback element, DMG Beam Refinement element and EDMG Channel Measurement Feedback element as shown in IEEE 802.11-17/0219r2 into the next draft 11ay specification?




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #186

Do you agree to adopt the mechanism described in slides 4 and 5 of 11-17/0422r0, as specified in 11-17/0420r2?

Moved: Carlos CordeiroSeconded: Assaf Kasher


Motion #187

Do you agree that the text in contribution 17/0323r2 (Draft text for BRP Transmit Sector Sweep) shall be incorporated into the next draft 11ay specification?



Motion #188

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed changes on SU-MIMO beamforming and MU-MIMO beamforming as shown in IEEE 802.11-17/0287r0 into the next draft 11ay specification?



Motion #189


Moved: Assaf KascherSeconded: Solomon Trainin



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #190

Do you agree to include the text changes to occupied bandwidth as defined in Doc: 11-17-0413-00-00ay Occupied bandwidth clarification?

Moved: Solomon TraininSeconded: Assaf Kasher


Motion #191

Do you agree to implement text changes to remove EDMG Compressed BlockAckReq as defined in Doc: 11-17-0412-02-00ay Compressed BlockAckReq for EDMG?

Moved: Solomon TraininSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #192

Do you agree to add a mechanism to the 802.11ay specification to perform the following? In the 11ay BRP protocol there shall be an option for the BRP frame to function as an action ACK frame. The procedure to recover feedback if the response is not ready is TBD.



Motion #193

Do you agree to incorporate the changes proposed in (11-17-0424-00-00ay-cr-on-mimo-phase-in-mu-mimo-bf.docx) into the draft spec?

Moved: Shunsuke FujioSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #194

Do you agree to add the following capability information in the EDMG capabilities element regarding LDPC codes into Draft IEEE 802.11ay?

Long LDPC codes capability information (1 bit) If the long LDPC codes capability field is set to 1, the STA supports LDPC long codeword for the

supported MCSs. Otherwise, the STA does not support LDPC long codeword.

Moved: Yutuka MurakamiSeconded: Sang Kim


Motion #195

Do you agree to include mechanisms that support tracking of the digital baseband channel for SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO hybrid beamforming in 802.11ay?



Motion #196

Do you agree that the text in contribution 17/0434r1 (Draft Text for Channel Allocation for SP) shall be incorporated in the 11ay draft?

Moved: Dejian LiSeconded: Jinnan Liu


Motion #199

Do you agree to adopt the text of “11-17-0450-01-00ay-EDMG Capability and Operation Element Channel Indication_r1” into Draft of IEEE 802.11ay?

Moved: Yan XinSeconded: Yutuka Murakami



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

2017 May

Motion #203

Do you agree to include the text for subclause “30.5.8 Non-EDMG Duplicate Transmission” proposed in (11-17-0525-01-00ay 30 5 8 Non-EDMG Duplicate Transmission for SC PHY) to the draft amendment?

Moved: Artyom LomayevSeconded: Alexander Maltsev


Motion #204

Do you agree to insert the following text in the draft amendment: IEEE 802.11-17/0523r2 Draft Text for MIMO Channel Access.docx?



Motion #205

Do you agree to incorporate the proposed changes on the MIMO phase of SU-MIMO beamforming and MU-MIMO beamforming as shown in IEEE 802.11-17/0541r2 into the draft amendment?



Motion #206

Do you agree to include the text from (11-17-0588-00-00ay 30 5 6 4 4 Block Interleaver for SC mode) defining SC block interleaver for 64QAM/64NUC to the draft amendment?




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #207

Do you agree to include the text from (11-17-0587-01-00ay 30 5 6 4 3 Space Time Block Coding) defining SC STBC scheme to the draft amendment?



Motion #208

Do you agree to define OFDM signal parameters as defined in (11-17-0597-01-00ay 30 6 1 OFDM Signal Parameters) and incorporate the proposed changes into the draft amendment?



Motion #209

Do you agree to include the text for EDMG-STF for EDMG OFDM mode in single channel proposed in (11-17-0546-00-00ay-EDMG-STF for OFDM in single channel) to the draft amendment?

Moved: JinMin KimSeconded: Sang Kim


Motion #210

Do you agree to include the text for Short SSW frame for A-BFT proposed in (11-17-0746-00-00ay Short SSW frame for A-BFT text) to the draft amendment?

Moved: Saehee BangSeconded: JinMin Kim



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #211

Do you agree to accept resolutions to CIDs 151, 476, 477, 340, 342, 452, 453, 454, 224, 225, 226, 341 in doc 11-17/0709r2?

Moved: Lei HuangSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #212

Do you agree to accept resolutions to CIDs 331, 343 in doc 11-17/0713r1?

Moved: Lei HuangSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #213

Do you agree to include the text for the beamforming training for channel bonding and channel aggregation proposed in (11-17-0743-00-00ay-Beamforming Training for CB & CA) to the draft amendment?

Moved: SungJin ParkSeconded: JinMin Kim


Motion #214

Do you agree to include the text for the length calculation proposed in (11-17-0788-00-00ay-Length Calculation in EDMG PPDU-Draft text) into the draft amendment as an informative text?

Moved: SungJin ParkSeconded: Hiroyuki Motozuka-san



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #215

Do you agree to include the text 17/0705r2 into the draft amendment?

Moved: Solomon TraininSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #216

Do you agree to include to the draft amendment the text: “EDMG Group fields of EDMG Group ID Set element should contain the STAs AIDs and the corresponding indexes of the AP TX sectors (chosen from the best sectors reported by STAs), which may be used by the AP for transmission to each STA in MU mode of operation.”?

Moved: Alexander MaltsevSeconded: Lei Huang


Motion #217

Do you agree to include the text for “Near-Far” self-classification capabilities of EDMG STAs proposed in (11-17-0764-02-00ay-text-near-far-self-classification-capabilities-of-edmg-stas) to the draft amendment?

Moved: Alexander MaltsevSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #218

Do you agree to add the amendment text of 11-17/0771r0 to D0.3

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Alexander Maltsev



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #219

Do you agree to include the text from (11-17-0596-00-00ay 30 6 3 OFDM EDMG-CEF Definition) defining EDMG-CEF field for PPDU transmission over the 2.16 GHz channel to the draft amendment?

Moved: Artyom LomayevSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #220

Do you agree to include the text from (11-17-0628-01-00ay 30 6 1 Pilot Sequences) defining OFDM pilots to the draft amendment?



Motion #221

Do you agree to include the text from (11-17-0712-00-00ay-30 6 1 OFDM Pilot sequences) defining OFDM pilot sequences for NCB > 1 to the draft amendment?

Moved: Sang KimSeconded: SungJin Park


Motion #222

Do you agree to accept resolutions to CID 24 in doc 11-17/0787r0?




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #223

Do you agree to include the definition of transmitter block diagram for SC mode proposed in (11-17-0752-02-00ay 30 5 2 Transmitter Block Diagram for SC Mode) into the draft amendment?



Motion #224

Do you agree to include the text proposed in (30 6 4 Encoding of EDMG-Header-B) and describing EDMG-Header-B encoding and modulation method to the draft amendment?



Motion #225

Do you agree to add the following capability information in the PHY Capability field of the EDMG capabilities element, as shown in 11-17-0757-00-00ay-text-for-phy-capability-field-in-edmg-capabilities-element, into the Draft IEEE802.11ay amendment?

SC Maximum Number of SU-MIMO Spatial Streams Supported OFDM Maximum Number of SU-MIMO Spatial Streams Supported

Moved: Yutaka MurakamiSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #226

Do you agree to include the proposed text changes in 17/0793r1 to the draft amendment?

Moved: Dzevdan KapetanovicSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #227

Do you agree to include spec text proposed in (11-17-0753-01-00ay 30 6 6 2 Space Time Block Coding) defining STBC scheme for OFDM PHY into the draft amendment?



Motion #228

Do you agree to accept resolutions to the following CIDs 24, 127, 200, 468, 201, 310, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 211, 210, 150, 213, 473, 216, 217, 218, 219, 222, 194, 223, 341, 224, 225, 226, 362, 230, 139, 234, 240, 241, 278, 242, 141, 243, 244, 245, 33, 279, 103, 281, 34, 280, 249, 273, 375, 88, 161, 181, 145, 80, 536, 537, 538, 382, 108, 109, 545, 530, 546, 532, 83, 391, 50, 164, 162, 163, 407, 516, 7, 321, 165, 166, 170, 173, 19, 22, 79, 167, 441, 169, 126, 171, 172, 168 in 17/0649r2?

Moved: Carlos CordeiroSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #229

Do you agree to include the proposed text changes in 17/0761r4 to the draft amendment?

Moved: Takenori SakamotoSeconded: Anuj Batra



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

2017 July

Motion #232

Do you agree to include the proposed text in 11-17-0431-00-00ay to the draft amendment?



Motion #233

Do you agree to make the following changes per the text described in 11-17-0818-02-00ay-updates-to-edca-channel-access-in-an-edmg-bss.docx?



Motion #234

Do you agree to accept resolutions to CID 227 in doc 11-17/0845r0?



Motion #235

Do you agree to include the text of 17/0870r3 for the subclause 30.6.7.2 into the draft amendment?

Moved: Artyom LomayevSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #236

Do you agree to accept the proposed comment resolution in 17/0892r4 for CIDs 4, 6, 128, 156, 158, 159, 414, and 415?



Motion #237

Do you agree to accept the proposed comment resolution for CIDs 63 and 68 in 17/0893r2 and include the proposed changes into the draft amendment?



Motion #238

Do you agree to define the scrambling for MCS 1 as described in (11-17-0904-00-00ay 30 5 7 3 3 Scrambler for MCS1 Encoding) and include the proposed text into the draft amendment?



Motion #239

Do you agree to accept the resolutions given in 11-17-0919-01-00ay to the following CIDs: 73, 75, 89, 122, 123, 262, 263, 296, 298, 401, 409, 410, 411, 412, and 413?

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #240

Do you agree to include the changes described in 11-17-0938-03-00ay to enable Short SSW usage in CBAP by unassociated STAs in the draft amendment?

Moved: Hiroyuki MotozukaSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #241

Do you agree to accept comment resolutions as proposed in doc 11-17/0921r4?



Motion #242

Do you agree to accept comment resolution for CIDs 303, 304, 305, 306, 309, 311, 317, 467, 308, 325, 336, 328, and 465 as proposed in doc 11-17/0649r5?



Motion #243

Do you agree to include the draft text proposed in 11-17-0923-00-00ay related to TRN subfield indexing into the 802.11ay draft amendment?




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #244

Do you agree to include the draft text proposed in 11-17-0924-00-00ay related to data/TRN transition interval into the 802.11ay draft amendment?



Motion #245

Do you agree to define the Control PHY PPDU transmission as defined in (11-17-1040-00-00ay Control Mode PPDU Transmission) and include the proposed text in the 802.11ay draft amendment?



Motion #246

Do you agree to define the SC PHY PPDU transmission as defined in (11-17-1043-00-00ay 30 5 8 Single Carrier PPDU Transmission) and include the proposed text in the 802.11ay draft amendment?



Motion #247

Do you agree to accept the change proposed for clause 10.24.7.7 as shown in slides 9 and 10 of 17/1026r0 and include the proposed text in the 802.11ay draft amendment?

Moved: Oren KedemSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #248

Do you agree to include the text for comment resolution on short SSW in A-BFT (11-17-1038-00-00ay-cr-on-short-ssw-in-a-bft) in the 802.11ay draft amendment?

Moved: Saehee BangSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #249

Do you agree to accept the proposed comment resolution in 17/1027r1 for CIDs 105, 149, 315, 316, 318, 322, 323, 324, 327, 383, 466, 482, 534 and 535?

Moved: Solomon TraininSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #250

Do you agree to accept comment resolution for CIDs 155, 38, 344, 345, 346, 348, 347, 330, 66, 60, 67 as proposed in doc 11-17/0649r5?



Motion #251

Do you agree to include the text for EDMG-STF for EDMG OFDM mode in CB>1 proposed in (11-17-1029-00-00ay-EDMG-STF for OFDM in 2,3,4CB Draft) to the spec amendment?

Moved: Sang KimSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #252

Do you agree to include the draft text proposed in 11-17-1042-01-00ay related to CE TRN transmission in BRP TXSS into the 802.11ay draft amendment?



Motion #253

Do you agree to adopt the comment resolutions to CIDs 10, 25, 61, 62, 64, 131, 133, 320, 481, 484, 518, and 520 as proposed in document 11-17/1075r1?

Moved: Thomas HandteSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #254

Do you agree to accept comment resolution as proposed in doc 11-17/1033r0?



Motion #255

Do you agree to accept comment resolution as proposed in doc 11-17/1041r0?




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #257

Do you agree to accept the resolution on transmission bandwidth of EDMG A-PPDU proposed in 11-17-1056-00-00ay?

Moved: Takenori SakamotoSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #258

Do you accept the resolutions to CIDs 27, 28, 36, 100, 363, 130, 174, 358, 180, 233, 364, 235, 357, 442, 461, and 360?

Moved: Assaf KasherSeconded: Carlos Cordeiro


Motion #259

Move to accept the comment resolution for CIDs 1, 2, 23, and 525 proposed in the contribution 17/0880r1.



Motion #260

Move to accept the proposed comment resolution in 17/1119r2 for CIDs 119 and 189.

Moved: James WangSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #261

Move to accept the comment resolution for CID 462 proposed in the contribution 17/1047r1.



Motion #262

Move to define the MCS set for EDMG OFDM PHY as described in the contribution 17/0909r0 and include the proposal in the draft amendment.



Motion #263

Move to define the EDMG-CEF for OFDM PHY in case of NCB > 1 as described in the contribution 17/1108r0 and include the proposal in the draft amendment.



Motion #264

Move to include the parity check matrix shown in the contribution 17/1061r1 in the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Yan XinSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #265

Move to include the changes as described in IEEE 802.11-17/1097r1 to define Beam Tracking and its associated signaling and procedures in the 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Rui YangSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #266

Move to include the text in the contribution 17/1083r0 in the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Dejian LiSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #267

Move to adopt the comment resolutions to CIDs 135,136,137,144 as proposed in doc: IEEE 802.11-17/1095r1.



Motion #269

Move to include the text in the contribution 17/1085r1 in the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Dejian LiSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

2017 September

Motion #272

Move to adopt the comment resolutions to CIDs 35, 81, 111, 112, 178, 192, 250, 354, 370, 372, 492, 493, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 515, 542, 543, 544 as proposed in 17/1112r2.

Moved: Claudo da SilvaSeconded: George Calcev


Motion #273

Move to adopt the comment resolutions to CIDs 74, 76, 77, 102, 292, 295, 297, 301, 332, 399, 430, and 431 as proposed in 17/1175r1 and 17/1175r2.



Motion #274

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1181r0 for BRP TXSS procedure into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.



Motion #275

Move to include the text that defines the modulation description of OFDM mode as proposed in 17/1170r2 into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #276

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 502 and 549 as proposed in doc 11-17/1185r0.



Motion #277

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1184r2 for MU-MIMO BF selection into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Hiroyuki MotozukaSeconded: Assaf Kasher


Motion #278

Move to accept the text proposed in 11-17/1221r3 for scrambler field indication into IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Assaf KasherSeconded: Yan Xin


Motion #279

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1182r2 for OFDM spoofing error length indicator into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #280

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 138, 214, 339, 471 and 472 as proposed in doc 11-17/1229r0.

Moved: Oren KedemSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #281

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 104, 195, 196, 450, 212, 449, 254, 267, 268, 269, 379, and 451 as proposed in doc 11-17/1230r3.

Moved: Oren KedemSeconded: Assaf Kscher


Motion #282

Move to accept comment resolution for CID 428 as proposed in doc 11-17/1180r2.



Motion #283

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1213r0 for SM power save into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #284

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1215r1 for MU-MIMO power save into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.



Motion #285

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1196r0 for the EDMG flow control mechanism into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Assaf KasherSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #286


Moved: Dana CiochinaSeconded: Assaf Kasher


Motion #287





September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #288

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1254r0 for facilitating rank adaptation of SU-MIMO transmission into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Li-Hsiang SunSeconded: Sang Kim


Motion #289




Motion #290

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1289r0 for EDMG coexistence with non-IEEE-802.11 systems into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Claudio da SilvaSeconded: Yutaka Murakami


Motion #291

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 153, 377, 444, 445, 446, 448, 463, 469, and 470 as proposed in doc 11-17/1230r4.

Moved: Oren KedemSeconded: Assaf Kasher



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #292




Motion #293

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1437r0 for a short variant of the BRP frame into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.



Motion #294

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1436r1 for line-of-sight beamforming training into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.



Motion #295

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1417r0 for power save delivery into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #296

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1452r0 related to the changes to BRP and MIMO frames to accommodate digital beamforming training into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Dana CiochinaSeconded: Claudio da Silva


Motion #297

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1331r0 for DMG TRN capability into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.



Motion #298

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 186, 187, 188, 371, 439, 440, and 513 as proposed in doc 11-17/1422r1.



Motion #299

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1424r0 for alternative single carrier MCS 12 and MCS 13 using 8-PSK modulation into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Chris HansenSeconded: Assaf Kasher



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #300

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1425r1 for unsolicited block ACK feature into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Chris HansenSeconded: Sang Kim


Motion #301

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1297r1 related to the changes to the BRP TXSS procedure into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.



Motion #302




Motion #303

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1300r0 for EDMG-Header-A encoding and modulation into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #304




Motion #305

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1410r1 for channel bandwidth definition into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Saehee BangSeconded: Jinmin Kim


Motion #306


Moved: Tony HanSeconded: Yan Xin


Motion #307

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 129, 425, 426, and 553 as proposed in doc 11-17/1405r1.

Moved: Jinmin KimSeconded: Sang Kim



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #308

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 44, 45, 93, 193, 349, 351, 353, 393, 504, and 550 as proposed in doc 11-17/1234r1.



Motion #309

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 272, 95, 94, 92, 96, 184, and 396 as proposed in doc 11-17/1439r2.



Motion #310

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1328r1 related to the changes to enable request for sector sweep feedback for BRP-TX packets into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.



Motion #311

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1382r2 for the delayed BRP feedback into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #312

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 40, 41, 42, 43, 113, 114, 152, and 483 as proposed in doc 11-17/1406r1.

Moved: SungJin ParkSeconded: Jinmin Kim


Motion #313

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 423, 424, 487, 488, 489, and 490 as proposed in doc 11-17/1404r2.

Moved: SunWoong YunSeconded: Jinmin Kim


Motion #314


Moved: Yutaka MurakamiSeconded: Sang Kim


Motion #315

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 3, 17, and 524 as proposed in doc 11-17/1441r0.

Moved: Yan XinSeconded: Tony Han



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #316


Moved: Assaf KasherSeconded: Kerstin Johnsson


Motion #317

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1411r2 for the EDMG-Header-A encoding and modulation for EDMG SC mode A-PPDU into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Takenori SakamotoSeconded: Sang Kim


Motion #318

Move to accept comment resolution for CIDs 9, 253, and 378 as proposed in doc 11-17/1413r1.

Moved: Takenori SakamotoSeconded: Sang Kim


Motion #319

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1446r2 for distributed scheduling into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Kerstin JohnssonSeconded: Claudio da Silva



September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Motion #320

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1409r0 for MU-MIMO channel access flow into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Tony HanSeconded: Kerstin Johnsson


Motion #321

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1432r3 for subclause 30.5.8.5.2 into the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.

Moved: Tao WuSeconded: Tony Han


Motion #322

Move to include the text proposed in 17/1414r0 for the EDMG segmentation and reassembly in the IEEE 802.11ay draft amendment.




September 2017 IEEE 802.11-17/0186r44

Revision History

Author Revision Date DescriptionEdward Au R0 January 20, 2017 Initial version.

Start of revision history tracking.Incorporate Motions #143 – #174 that are considered in January 2017 interim.

Edward Au R1 March 17, 2017 Incorporate Motions #178 – #196 and #199 that are considered in March 2017 plenary.

Edward Au R2 May 11, 2017 Incorporate Motions #203 – #229 that are considered in May 2017 interim.

Edward Au R3 July 15, 2017 Incorporate Motions #232 – #256, #258 – #267, and #269 that are considered in July 2017 plenary.

Edward Au R4 September 14, 2017 Incorporate Motions #272 – #322 that are considered in September 2017 interim.


ieee 802.11-17/0186r4 - ieee standards association · web view“edmg trn subfield for cb...

Documents