ieee nuclear science symposium nov. 8 2001, san diego, ca professor priscilla cushman university of...
TRANSCRIPT
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Problems and Solutions Problems and Solutions in high-rate multi-channel Hybrid Photodiode design in high-rate multi-channel Hybrid Photodiode design
HPD’s for the CMS Hadronic CalorimeterHPD’s for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter
Professor Priscilla CushmanProfessor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of Minnesota
The US-CMS HCAL Collaboration
Fermilab Florida State Purdue Notre Dame University of Illinois (Chicago) University of Mississippi University of Maryland Rochester University of Minnesota
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
HCAL
The CMS Tile/Fiber Hadronic CalorimeterThe CMS Tile/Fiber Hadronic Calorimeter
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Reading out the Towers of Tiles with WLS fiber and HPD’sReading out the Towers of Tiles with WLS fiber and HPD’s
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Optical Decoder UnitOptical Decoder Unit
HPD mount aligned to cookie and plate
Fiber Optic Cables attach to a patch panel
Optical decoding from layer into tower bundles occurs at
the readout boxes.
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Stringent Photodetector RequirementsStringent Photodetector Requirements
• Magnetic Field of 4 Tesla
• Linear Response from MIP to 3 TeV Shower
• DC Calibration to 2% using Radioactive Source
• Integrated Neutron Dose of up to 5 x 1010 n/cm2
• Integrated Output Charge up to 3 Coulombs
• Use same system in HO for ease of integration
Outer Barrel and Endcap have relaxed constraints
• tag muons (10 p.e./MIP) and measure shower tails
• many channels => low cost
• fringe field
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
The Hybrid PhotodiodeThe Hybrid Photodiode
Tube Fabrication by DDelft EElectronic PProducts (Netherlands) Subcontracts: Canberra (Belgium) diodes Schott Glass (USA) fiber optic windows Kyocera (Japan) vacuum feedthru/ceramic carrier
19 x 5.4mm 73 x 2.68mm
CMS diode design
• 12 kV across 3.3 mm gap with Vth < 3 kV => Gain of 2500
• Silicon PIN diode array, T-type. Operated at 80 V reverse bias
• Thin (200 m) with 100 V reverse bias for fast charge (holes) collection
• Aluminized surface and AR Coating
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
How They WorkHow They Work
PIN Diode arrayCeramic feedthrough
Fiber-OpticWindow
PhotocathodeElectrons from the photocathode are accelerated in a high electric field and stop in the diode where they generate electron hole pairs.Detect current as holes move across the depletion region in the back-illuminated version.
e
4
16 kV
Gain
0
0
4000
80
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
APD vs HPD decision (1995-6 CERN test beams)System Integration Issues NIM A387 (1997) 107Signal/Noise at low light-levels
AC: 1 MIP=7-10 pe DC: Radioactive Source
Validation B-field Studies at 4-5 T NIM A418 (1998) 300 Radiation Damage at Oak Ridge NIM A411 (1998) 304
Extensive Bench Studies
Project Approval and CMS-specific design Negotiate specifications and priceAcquire prototypes and test NIM A442 (2000) 289
From Validation to Quality Assurance and YieldThis has been LONGER than we expected !
Iterate
Anatomy of a DecisionAnatomy of a Decision
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Magnetic Field Issues
Performance measured at 4 TeslaDoesn’t breakImage shift = gap * tan
Small gain shifts (angular effects and backscattter)
Align tube axis parallel to fieldField locally uniform: ~ 5o (6o) inclination in HB (HE)Minimum gap (eases tolerance) vs HV (maintain gain)
Maintain sufficient space between fiber bundlesMechanically robust cookiesMaximize photocathode active area
Pixel position must be measured (and aligned) to 50 m
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Larger active area: Less room for HV connection, possible field distortions
Minimize gap: Improve tube components
This has been a development projectThis has been a development project (the tube)
HV coax cable : Reliability and compatibility with RBX
RBX mountings and cookies must be rubber insulated
Gold-plated pins: Enables us to use ZIF sockets - questions of gold diffusion
FIBERS
RBX
HPD
RBXCookie
HV Cable
Electronics Interface Board
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
HV Discharge to HPD MountingHV Discharge to HPD Mounting
Current across mount at 12 kVwith normal RBX configuration
nAm
ps
Lifetime Setup modified for HV Monitor
Trigger: 1 nA for spikes + 1.5 minute interval
Time (hrs)
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
After silicon rubber potting, at 15 kV
nAm
ps
Time (hrs)
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Richardson-Dushman Equation Jth = AoT2exp(-eff/kT)eff = 1.09 for this fit.
Photocathode has a typical ePhotocathode has a typical e--dependence on Temperaturedependence on Temperature
Keep red sensitivity low. Fitted eff ranged from 1 - 1.33Dark counts at 25oC are 50 Hz – 1 kHz
Peltier CoolerControl
Thermocouple
Aluminum BlockPeltier Cooler
HPD
HPD DifferentialOutput
HPD Serial # R9851087 5-3-99
-100
400
900
1400
1900
2400
-10 0 10 20 30 40
Dar
k P
ulse
s pe
r S
econ
d
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-22.3E+20 2.4E+20 2.5E+20 2.6E+20 2.7E+20 2.8E+20
1/kT
ln(J
/T^2
)
Temperature (oC)
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Custom Pixel Design: 19 ch (towers) and 73 ch (short stacks)
This has been a development projectThis has been a development project ( the diode)
2 side-contacts (100 nm thick Al)
Bump-bonded vacuum feedthru
n++ contact
n++ n++p+ p+ p+ p+ p+
n+ bulk (200 m thick)
AR (16 nm sputtered Si)Metal (25 nm AL)Barrier (25 nm SiO2)
Higher pin-out density: wire-bonds =>glass feedthrus => ceramic from Kyocera
Alignment to 50 m: manufacturer tolerances tightened, new measurement procedures
Improved rise time: Thinner silicon: 200 m replaces 300 m
Guard ring and drain structure: lower leakage current and better uniformity for edge pixels
Lower depletion voltage and better control of process: higher breakdown voltage
Surface aluminization and edge traces: Reduce negative crosstalk: 300 /sq => 1.7 /sq
Anti-reflective coating: Reduce positive crosstalk from reflected light
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Capacitance as a function of reverse bias voltageCapacitance as a function of reverse bias voltage
33 pF
18 pF
Depletion at 43 V and 25 V
C73 = 5 pF/pixel C19 = 20 pF/pixel C(interface card and leads) = 13 pF
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
pe’s
Internal Electric Field in the bulk n-type siliconInternal Electric Field in the bulk n-type siliconOutput current and pulse width can be calculated with this simple modelOutput current and pulse width can be calculated with this simple model
2
2
/)()(2
dVVNqetI db
td
Vd
from t = 0 to t =
V=VbV=0
n++ p+ n+
E(0) =Vb-Vd
d
x
E
x=dx=0
E(d) = 2Vd + E(0) = Vb+Vd
d d
d
VV
d
xVxE dbd )(2)(
2
h hhh h
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Drift time of holes translates into pulse width Drift time of holes translates into pulse width Simple form for over-depletion matches dataSimple form for over-depletion matches data
d
db
db VVV
VVdns
ln)( 2
bV V
dd
2
0lim
Pulse Width
72
1098.6 d
From fit: Consistency check: Hole mobility in silicon is = 450 cm2/Vs
cm d018 . 0 10 98 . 67
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
300 m thick 200 m thick
Pulse width can be shortened by reducing wafer thickness d Pulse width can be shortened by reducing wafer thickness d or by increasing bias voltage, Vor by increasing bias voltage, Vbb
Drift time is approximately given by
and the shape of the plateau mirrors the internal electric field
bV V
dd
2
0lim
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
200 100 66 50 40 33 28.5 25 Volts Bias Voltage
d
db
db uVVV
VVdns
ln)( 2
For higher depletion (lower ohmic silicon) VFor higher depletion (lower ohmic silicon) Vbb-V-Vdd ~ V ~ Vb b is not trueis not true
Fit data to modelearly (5 k-cm silicon) diodes 12 k-cm diodes
Operating bias voltage = 80 V
We now SPECIFY > 8 k-cm P
uls
e W
idth
50 ns
40 ns
30 ns
20 ns
10 ns
0 1/Vb
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Total Leakage current for all 73 pixels HPD R0003241 (new-style diode)
0.00E+00
5.00E-09
1.00E-08
1.50E-08
2.00E-08
2.50E-08
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Bias (Volts)
Cu
rre
nt
(am
ps
)
No evidence of breakdown, even at 500 volts!
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Pulse Width in nsec
Flatter plateau and higher breakdown for new diodesFlatter plateau and higher breakdown for new diodes
R0003241 (200 micron, 73-channel new-style diode)
Reminder: on the same scale
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Crosstalk in non-Aluminized 73-ch tube (B=1.5)
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
200 250 300 350 400
time[ns]
I/50o
hms[
mv]
pixel 36pixel 35pixel 34pixel 33pixel 37 /100
Crosstalk in Aluminized 73-ch tube (B=1.5)
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
200 250 300 350 400time[ns]
I/50o
hms[
mv]
pixel 36
pixel 35pixel 34
pixel 33pixel 37 /100
AC Crosstalk eliminated by AluminizationAC Crosstalk eliminated by Aluminization
33 34 35 36 37
Pixels in center row
Positive crossstalk now observed !
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Distance d from edge of pixel (mm)
% C
ros
sta
lkBackscatter crosstalk for a 19-channel Aluminized HPDBackscatter crosstalk for a 19-channel Aluminized HPD
Move fiberRead outnearest neighbor
Convolution of hexagonal pixel shape with backscatter radial distribution
d
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
0o 45o 90o
Initial scattering angle of backscattered electron
Rad
ial D
ista
nce
fro
m im
pac
t p
oin
t (m
m)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Ballistic model of Backscattering. 10 keV electrons Ballistic model of Backscattering. 10 keV electrons
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Trajectories of Backscattered ElectronsTrajectories of Backscattered Electrons
B = 0 T = 45o
B = 0.15 T = 45o
B = 4 T = 75o
Radial distance
Radial distance is a minimum here
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Number of backscattered e’s Number of backscattered e’s as a function of radial distance from impact pointas a function of radial distance from impact point
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 mm 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 mm
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 mm 0 .025 .05 .075 .1 .125 .15 mm
B = 0 T B = 0.15 T
B = 4 TB = 0.2 T
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
0.0%0.2%0.4%0.6%0.8%1.0%1.2%1.4%1.6%1.8%2.0%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Pixel Number
% C
ross
talk
B=0 Aluminized B=1.5T Aluminized B=1.5T Al + AR
Positive crosstalk from backscatter can be removed by B-Positive crosstalk from backscatter can be removed by B-fieldfield
73-ch tube Total DC Crosstalk(2.7 mm pixels) B=0 B=1.5 T
Bare silicon 18% 7%Aluminized 29% 16%Al with AR 12.4% 4.3%
STILL some positive crosstalkand Al is worse than silicon
33-41
1-2
72-73
Pixel number
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
photoelectrons
Light
Re-emitted photoelectrons
APD views reflected light
pe backscatter focussed by B
Light injected thru fiber
Test Confirms Reflected LightTest Confirms Reflected Light
DIODE ARRAY
FIBER OPTIC & PHOTOCATHODE
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Compare residual HPD crosstalk in B-FieldCompare residual HPD crosstalk in B-Fieldwith APD measurement of optical reflection with APD measurement of optical reflection
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Study Problem at Minnesota, then export technology to DEPStudy Problem at Minnesota, then export technology to DEP
IMD - optical modeling package for multilayer structures
(by David L. Windt, http://cletus.phys.columbia.edu/windt/idl)
Ag oxidizes quickly Au not available
Model
Data monochrometer
PIN diode
Samples: glass slides with various coatings (PECVD)
10 nm Ag120 nm SiO2
8 nm A-Si15 nm Ag50 nm SiO2
16 nm A-Si25 nm Al25 nm SiO2
Some Options
DEP makes samples on old
diodes using sputtering
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Deposition rate a-Si:H at 3 Watts, T=300 C, P=1.1 Torr
y = 25.631x
R2 = 0.9999
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Deposition time (minutes)
La
ye
r th
ick
ne
ss
(A
ng
str
om
s)
5.4 min10.8 nm
20 min52.1 nm
30 min76.7 nm
60 min153.5 nm
Comparison of Model vs Data calibrates PE-CVD ProcessComparison of Model vs Data calibrates PE-CVD Processa-Si:H (SiH4 gas) deposited on glass slides
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Measured Reflectance of 14nm A-SiH on top of thin Al layer
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
400 450 500 550 600 650 700
Wavelength (nm)
Re
fle
cta
nc
e
a-Si:H before bakeout
a-Si:H after bake-out
Bare Aluminum (25 nm)
Glass slides + 25 nm Al + 14 nm a-Si:HGlass slides + 25 nm Al + 14 nm a-Si:H
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Minnesota test slides
14 nm a-SiH 25 nm Al 25 nm SiO2
First DEP attempt at 16 nm a-Si
MC for 10 nm
We tell them to add another 6 nm
MC for 16 nm
Reflectance Studies
Angular Dependenceof test slides
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Specifications are finalized in ContractQuality Assurance protocol detailed
4.1 Photocathode Fiber Optic Window with green-sensitive Photocathode
Minimum Typical Maximum UnitQuantum Efficiency at 520nm 11 %Dark counts 50 kHz/cm2
Non-Uniformity in PC response 8 %Operating voltage 12 13 -kV
4.2 Diode Silicon PIN diode array, T-type
Minimum Typical Maximum Unit Threshold for 10kev electon 500 2500 3300 V
Thickness non-uniformity ±1 µmSilicon resistivity 5 kΩ cm
Response non-uniformity 10 %Resistance between pixels 100 MΩDepletion depth 185 200 215 µm
Reversed diode characteristics: Operating voltage 80 80 V
Breakdown voltage 100 Full Depletion voltage 20 30 V Guard Ring Reverse current (80 V bias) 500 nA
Reverse current per pixel (80V bias) 1 10* nA * For each HPD one pixel may have a reverse current of 50 nA.
19-channel Pattern
Total active area 487 mm2
Active area per channel 25.6 mm2
Flat to flat hex 5.4 mmGap between pixel contacts 40 µm
Capacitance 14 pF
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Specifications are finalized in Contract...continued
4.3 Overall Tube Performance:Minimum Typical Maximum Unit
ELECTRON GAIN Gain 2300 e/pe
Gain non-linearity 5 % (signal range 1 - 70000 photo-electrons)
CROSSTALKTotal optical crosstalk to sum of all pixels 3 %Total capacitive crosstalk to sum of all pixels 3 %
TIMINGFull Width Half Maximum at 80 V 20 nsBaseline Maximum at 80 V 30 ns
MAGNETIC FIELDResistant to axial B-fields to 4 Tesla
Gap between PC and diode 3.55 mmCarrier size tolerance with in one batch ±40 µm
PIXEL FAILURE No disconnected pixels allowed
OPERATING CONDITIONS Operating temperature -20 20 +40 °C
Radiation Environment 108 109 1010 n/cm2/yr
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Quality AssuranceQuality Assurance
fail pass
Return to Return to DEP DEP
Bake-out at 13 kV for 2 weeks
Evaluate 500 tubes, automated procedure, complete web-accessible databaseEvaluate 500 tubes, automated procedure, complete web-accessible database
Leakage current for each pixel and guard ring @ 80V
HV gain, reverse bias curve
DC StationAlignment measurements for 50 micron tolerance Machine
custom ring
crosstalk checks alignment
2-D response scans (10kV, 80 V)
pe spectra, AC xtalk capacitance vs bias
To FNAL for installation in readout boxes
AC Station Lifetime: Q, Cf252, HV
High Rate and B-Field testssubset
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Precision RegistrationPrecision Registration
• Test fixture = Standard Mount + metal plate with 3 alignment holes
• Scan to find centroid of alignment holes
• Same scan finds pixel intersections above and below metal piece by iterative sector equalization
• Machine shop uses measured x, y, to produce Custom Ring
Stabilized light source
HP
D
Mou
nt
Scanning Table
Integratingsphere Focussing
optics
Green filter
Metal alignment
plate
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
FIBERS
Plate
HPD
Alignment Pins
Plate Cookie
Ring HV Cable
Electronics Interface Board
Optical Decoding Unit
• Each ring is registered to its HPD via alignment pins
• Plate and Cookies are universal
Precision Registration (in assembly)Precision Registration (in assembly)
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Universal Cookie + PlateUniversal Cookie + Plate
73-channel (HB) 19-channel (HB right)
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
HPD alignment after correction for 8 tubesHPD alignment after correction for 8 tubes
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Samples from DC database Samples from DC database
Pixel Number Dark Current
1 8.6827e-0092 9.2811e-0093 2.4709e-0084 8.6967e-0095 8.995e-0096 2.2894e-0087 8.2391e-0098 2.1001e-0089 9.1783e-00910 2.2305e-008
11 1.36793e-00812 8.7693e-00913 2.0977e-00814 3.0818e-00815 1.78352e-00816 7.1035e-00917 7.2061e-00918 8.2694e-00919 7.2356e-009
Total Current 2.6605e-007
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
AC Station: Viking chip serial readout at 10 MHz
HPD +interface card
AC-Coupling2 chip
128 channel PARepeater card
Laptop with ADC card
128 Mu
ltiplexer
ShaperSample& hold
10 MHzreadout
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Individual spectra for each pixel from AC StationIndividual spectra for each pixel from AC Station19-channel tube at low light levels19-channel tube at low light levels
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Lifetime Issues
PIN reference diodes
1.0 mm diam. WLS fibers
Blue LED’sPixel 1
HPD
Pixel 2
Lifetime Monitoring Stations monitor current (PIN diodes, HPD) and temperature
Radiation Damage: (10 CMS years = 5 x 1010 n/cm2 in worst region)
Expose samples to Cf252 Oak Ridge: Early HPD version to 1013 n/cm2 in 1997 tests.Minnesota: Low flux drawer instrumented
Aluminized new HPD to >1011 n/cm2 in 2001
Integrated Charge: (10 CMS years = 3 C over 25.6 mm2 pixel at high
Expose to accelerated rate plus control pixel at CMS rate.
Surface scans done before and after exposure distinguish between photocathode degradation and silicon damage.
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Red light with HV=0 Scans only silicon
Green light with HV = 8 kV Scans total tube response
Concentrated light in a small fiber will damage photocathodeConcentrated light in a small fiber will damage photocathodeThis is far beyond the CMS rate which allows for photocathode self-annealingThis is far beyond the CMS rate which allows for photocathode self-annealing
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
6 CMS months for high towerat expected CMS rate
6 CMS years for high towerat 13 x expected rate
Accelerated aging testsAccelerated aging tests: Red (upper curves) = 73-ch aluminized HPD Blue (lower curves) = old tube with poor potting
Lifetime setup traps sparking by triggering on current spikes from High Voltage Supply
All curves normalized to reference diode and corrected for temperature shifts
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
Irradiate 73-channel aluminized HPD - leakage current increasesIrradiate 73-channel aluminized HPD - leakage current increases
Leakage current rising at 46 pA/hr
PIN diode => Injected light is constant
HPD (light-dark)
hours
Flux = 7 x 109 n/(cm2 hr)MeV neutrons from Cf252
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
Integrated dose is geometrically equivalent to 4.5 x 1011 n/cm2 head on
10 CMS years
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumNov. 8 2001, San Diego, CA
Professor Priscilla CushmanUniversity of Minnesota
ConclusionsConclusions
5 years ago, no existing technology could satisfy our specifications.
Development project was initiated with one Company - DEPwith backup plans which included Hamamatsu and Litton
Rigorous evaluation must include accelerated aging and test beams and enough prototype detectors to understand the yield.
The anticipated problems are not the ones that really bite you.
This takes time! In the last year, the HPD subsystem has approached “critical path” in the CMS Project.
Final Result: CMS HCAL gets what it needs (so we can find the Higgs) and a better product is offered to the general public.