ifci limited new delhi - sdf presentation.pdfdr. emandi sankara rao md & ceo ifci ltd. is the...

19
Sugar Development Fund IFCI Limited New Delhi Dated: 16/08/2018

Upload: others

Post on 29-Mar-2020

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Dr. Emandi Sankara Rao

MD & CEO

IFCI Ltd. is the Nodal Agency for channelizing theSugar development Fund (SDF) of the Governmentof India since inception of the Fund in 1986.

IFCI monitors the SDF loans sanctioned to privatesugar factories for modernization-cum-expansion,setting-up of bagasse based cogeneration powerprojects, manufacture of ethanol fromalcohol/molasses, zero liquid discharge (ZLD)distillery projects, cane development schemes.

As a Nodal agency of GOI, IFCI is primarily responsiblefor examination/execution of loan proposals andsecurity documents, recommendation to GOI forrelease of funds, undertaking site visits for verificationof physical and financial progress, verification ofutilization of loan monies released by SDF, maintainingloan accounts of borrowers, recovery of SDF dues,taking legal actions against defaulters, etc.

The Sugar Development Fund Act, 1982 provides forthe following purposes for which the fund shall beapplied:(i) Making loans for facilitating the rehabilitation andmodernization of any sugar factory or any unit thereof,including to a potentially viable sugar undertaking.(ii) Making loans for undertaking any scheme fordevelopment of sugarcane in the area in which anysugar factory is situated, including to a potentiallyviable sugar undertaking.(iii) Making grants for the purpose of carrying out anyresearch project aimed at the promotion anddevelopment of any aspect of Sugar Industry.(iv) Defraying expenditure to a sugar factory on internaltransport and freight charges on export shipment ofsugar with a view to promoting its export.

Cont……..

(v) Making loans to any sugar factory having an installedcapacity of 2500 TCD or higher to implement a project ofbagasse based cogeneration of power.(vi) Making loans to any sugar factory having an installedcapacity of 2500 TCD or higher for production ofanhydrous alcohol or ethanol from alcohol or molasseswith a view to improving its viability.(vii) Defraying expenditure to a sugar factory for thepurpose of building up and maintenance of buffer stockwith a view to stabilizing price of sugar.(viii) Defraying expenditure for the purpose of financialassistance to sugar factories towards interest on loansgiven in terms of any scheme approved by the CentralGovernment from time to time.(ix) Defraying any other expenditure for the purpose ofthe Act.(x) Making loans to any sugar factory for conversion ofexisting ethanol plant into Zero Liquid Discharge plant.

Total Sanction : Rs. 6670.00 croreTotal Disbursement : Rs. 5409.78 croreAgency Commission : Rs. 218.67 crore

Current Status

Total Exposure : Rs. 2670.15 crore Number of Cases monitored : 131Number of Accounts monitored : 331

Cumulative Figures

2

5

9

22

21

14

19

7 8

5

9

7

14 1

6

6

4

15

3

11 12

8

18

40

25

41

49

24

52

19

8

12

17

11

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

19

85

-86

19

86

-87

19

87

-88

19

88

-89

19

89

-90

19

90

-91

19

91

-92

19

92

-93

19

93

-94

19

94

-95

19

95

-96

19

96

-97

19

97

-98

19

98

-99

19

99

-00

20

00

-01

20

01

-02

20

02

-03

20

03

-04

20

04

-05

20

05

-06

20

06

-07

20

07

-08

20

08

-09

20

09

-10

20

10

-11

20

11

-12

20

12

-13

20

13

-14

20

14

-15

20

15

-16

20

16

-17

20

17

-18

Year wise number of cases Sanctioned

No

. of

Cas

es

Year wise Amount Sanctioned

Rs.

in C

rore

1.7

9

4.4

6

6.2

4 46

.24

49

.70

40

.97 9

6.2

6

24

.93

37

.17

27

.82

42

.49

54

.44 89

.03

15

4.1

9

67

.49

42

.57

13

5.6

6

34

.54

16

4.9

6

14

2.3

9

73

.97

37

4.2

5

75

9.8

7

50

2.6

3

82

9.8

8

29

7.9

7

22

7.4

8

51

4.3

1

47

5.0

0

28

5.0

0

31

5.0

0

51

7.0

0

23

4.3

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1985

-86

1986

-87

1987

-88

1988

-89

1989

-90

1990

-91

1991

-92

1992

-93

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

2015

-16

2016

-17

2017

-18

Year wise Disbursement

1.7

9

4.4

6

6.2

4

46

.24

49

.70

40

.97

89

.09

24

.39

37

.17

26

.93

42

.49

54

.44 82

.69

15

1.2

6

67

.49

42

.57

13

2.5

8

34

.54

16

3.5

6

12

6.4

9

71

.72

34

2.8

1

26

8.1

8

44

1.9

4

52

1.3

1

54

3.0

7

34

0.4

9

35

3.0

5

41

8.0

0

27

0.0

0

12

1.0

0

11

2.0

0

38

1.1

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

19

85

-86

19

86

-87

19

87

-88

19

88

-89

19

89

-90

19

90

-91

19

91

-92

19

92

-93

19

93

-94

19

94

-95

19

95

-96

19

96

-97

19

97

-98

19

98

-99

19

99

-00

20

00

-01

20

01

-02

20

02

-03

20

03

-04

20

04

-05

20

05

-06

20

06

-07

20

07

-08

20

08

-09

20

09

-10

20

10

-11

20

11

-12

20

12

-13

20

13

-14

20

14

-15

20

15

-16

20

16

-17

20

17

-18

Rs.

in C

rore

Agency Commission Structure

• The commission for actual recovery is 2%• The Commission for Outstanding Amount is as detailed

under:

Commission (%) of

Outstanding Loans

Commission is applicable for

following period

Commission(%) applicable for

remaining period

Modernization 0.5% 3 Yr 0.25%

Cogeneration 0.5% 2 Yr 0.25%

Ethanol 0.5% 1 Yr 0.25%

Cane Development

0.20% 2 Yr 0.10%

No commission are paid by SDF/GOI for default cases (i.e.) cases where company is in default for 2 or more due dates

Year wise Commission earned by IFCI

0.0

1

0.0

3

0.0

8

0.3

3

0.5

4

0.8

4

1.2

2

1.3

8

1.6

5

2.0

6

2.2

6

2.6

1

3.0

2 3.7

5

4.2

4

4.6

9

5.3

3

5.6

3

5.9

7 6.7

5

7.0

1

11

.28

8.1

7

11

.40

14

.59

16

.91

17

.56 1

9.3

3

18

.23

16

.04

15

.50

10

.25

0

5

10

15

20

25

19

86

-87

19

87

-88

19

88

-89

19

89

-90

19

90

-91

19

91

-92

19

92

-93

19

93

-94

19

94

-95

19

95

-96

19

96

-97

19

97

-98

19

98

-99

19

99

-00

20

00

-01

20

01

-02

20

02

-03

20

03

-04

20

04

-05

20

05

-06

20

06

-07

20

07

-08

20

08

-09

20

09

-10

20

10

-11

20

11

-12

20

12

-13

20

13

-14

20

14

-15

20

15

-16

20

16

-17

20

17

-18

Rs.

in C

rore

Total Outstanding as on 31/03/2018 : Rs.2449.57 CroreR

s. in

Cro

re

1,276.33

793.75

216.37 163.12

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,40052.104%

32.404%

8.833% 6.659%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Total Outstanding as on 30/06/2018 : Rs.2670.15 CroreR

S. In

Cro

re

1334.40

911.58

264.55158.63

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

140049.993%

34.152%

9.911%5.943%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Outstanding Position as on 30/06/2018

S.No Type No. of casesNo. of

Actt.

Principal

OSInterest OS Total OS % of OS

1 Regular Cases 53 192 1014.99 125.86 1140.85 42.73%

2 Default Cases 78 139 904.43 624.87 1529.30 57.27%

Total 131 331 1919.42 750.73 2670.15 100.00%

Default Position as on 30/06/2018

S.No TypeNo. of

cases

No. of

Actt.

Principal

Default

Interest

Default

Funded

Interest

Total

Default

% of

Default

1 Single Instalment Default 15 23 23.27 4.48 1.19 28.94 2.41%

2 Legal Action Taken 24 39 190.38 298.48 12.41 501.28 41.74%

3 Legal Action under initiation 6 14 55.81 67.95 1.10 124.86 10.40%

4

Approval to be obtained for

Legal Action 20 40 193.75 187.62 3.99 385.36 32.09%

5 Others (Close Monitoring) 13 23 129.87 26.76 3.98 160.61 13.37%

Total 78 139 593.08 585.29 22.67 1201.04 100.00%

Rs. In Cr.

Rs. In Cr.

PeriodNo. of Regular

Accounts

No. of

Default

Accounts

Total No.

of

Accounts

Default

Amount

in crore

Security

Prior to 30/06/2013 91 112 203 1089.32Loans are secured by

way of second charge

After 30/06/2013 101 27 128 111.72

Loans are mainly

secured by way of First

pari-passu charge

Total 192 139 331 1201.04

An over view of the accounts

• Cyclical Industry• Low Yield of Sugarcane• Old and obsolete machinery• Low rate of recovery• Low per capita consumption• Short crushing season• Fluctuating Production Trends• Mismatch between cost of production

and sale price

Challenges for Sugar Factory

• No provision for One time Settlement ofdefault cases

• No Restructuring facility by way of anywavier

• DRT Process is time consuming and postissuance of RC, even if we go for sale,proceed will first go to 1st charge holderand residual, if any, will come for 2nd

Charge Holder.• Companies cannot be declared as wilful

defaulter under SDF as RBI is notagreeable

Limitations in SDF Rules

Provision in SDF rules for OTS andresolution through NCLT which mayentail sacrifice, if necessitate. (IFCI is inthe process of submitting a proposal)

Suggestions to SDF/GOI

Contact Details:Jagdish Garwal Manoranjan SarmaDeputy General Manager ManagerSugar Development Fund Sugar Development FundEmail : [email protected] Email : [email protected] : 9599193795 Mobile : 9990725724