iforth-ics may 2014 cidoc crm workshop data objects & semantics center for cultural informatics,...

87
IFORTH-ICS May 2014 CIDOC CRM Workshop Data Objects & Semantics Center for Cultural Informatics, Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas Martin Doerr Prato, Tuscany, May 26-30, 2014

Upload: sylvia-barker

Post on 28-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IFORTH-ICS May 2014

CIDOC CRM Workshop

Data Objects & Semantics

Center for Cultural Informatics, Institute of Computer Science

Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas

Martin Doerr

Prato, Tuscany, May 26-30, 2014

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMLibrary, Archive, Museum Information

The typical library contents: “The whole stories”, access widely solved! Primary literature: Fiction. Categorical: theories and hypotheses Secondary literature (research results) Facts brought into causal context

The typical museum information: “Museum objects rarely talk” Factual documentation of

properties and context per object, references, classification Highly heterogeneous, About things taken out of original context, distributed over the world

2

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

The typical archive contents: “The needle in the haystack” Primary sources, “bits and pieces” (letters, legal documents, administration

acts, images, scientific records) Factual, kept in the contextual sequence of creation, as by the creator or

responsible Kept due to mandate related to functions. Access indirectly through guessing: “who should have written about it?”

Similarly, library content itself: “What is in the book?” Parts of book content (citations!) are primary source of investigation Current access forms: not much more than keyword search, if a digital form

exists…

Library, Archive, Museum Information

3

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

Libraries Museums

Archives

illustrate,exemplify

are aboutBooks

Objects, Sites

primary Documents

provide finding aids

refer to

document features & context

providefinding aids

contain narrativesmade from

publish

using

SMRs

Library, Archive, Museum Information

document manage

refer to

exhibit

pub lish

4

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMLibrary, Archive, Museum Information

Example: Museum Data are not “Metadata”

5

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMRelevance of Cultural Objects

By: Thomas Bewick 1753-1828, LondonIn: “The figures of Bewick’s quadrupeds”, Edward Walker, Newcastle, 1824.

6

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMThe Scholarly Process

discovercollect

aggregateupdate

Search,correlate,integrate

Referinterpretpresent

Layer of“Latest

Knowledge”

“Evidence layer”Things

SourcesCollections

Corpora

PublicationsStories

exhibitions

Ethiopia

Johanson's Expedition

Hadar

Discovery of Lucy

Lucy

Cleveland Museum of Natural History

Donald Johanson

AL 288-1

Hypertext is wrong!

7

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMKnowledge Representation

How To Find

The Global Schema ??

8

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMKnowledge Representation: Basic Notions

What is “Knowledge Representation”:

Representation of concepts, items (particulars) and their interrelation as perceived by humans and expressed in terms of a formal language, such as logic, conceptual graphs etc.

The intended meaning (semantics) is the interpretation (identification) of used symbols as things and categories in the described universe (“domain”, “world”, “real world), and the interpretation of expressions, which use those symbols, as statements about their structure and interrelations (early Wittgenstein).

A set of related knowledge representation expressions is called a model (of a domain).

IT Jargon (due to limited scope): “KNOWLEDGE” instead of model

“SEMANTICS” instead of expressions

9

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMKnowledge Representation: Reservations

Limitations:“Principles of equivalence”: Given a model accepted as correct by a human, logical

(automatable) inferences from a model should conform with the expectations of a human. Only in this sense represents knowledge representation (KR) knowledge. KR is a means of communication.

Expressions are rarely/never definitions, but partial constraints. (see also late Wittgenstein, Eleonore Rosch - George Lakoff).

Formal languages fit only partially the way we think.

Psychological Obstacles to create KR:The true structure of our thoughts is unconscious.

Beware of compressions (Gilles Fauconnier, “The Way We Think”).

Methodological questions reveal part of it (e.g. change of context).

10

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMFrom Forms to Classes (a “decompression”)

Patient

Name String

Weight Number

Birth date Time

Birth Place String

Address String

Attributes(sometimescalled “part-of”)

Table name

Value types

What does that mean as statements about the world? Is it correct, e.g., “Address” ?

Relational Database Tables:

- an abstraction from forms, - a model for (statistical)

information processing

11

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

Address table

Patient

Name String

Weight Number

Birth Date Time

Birth Place String

has

Address: Shared with others

Changes over time

Can be multiple

Independent entity

What about Birth Date?

From Forms to Classes (a “decompression”)

12

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

Address table

Patient

Name String

Weight Number

has

has

Birth Date, Birth Place Shared with others

Birth shared with others (twins)!

Independent entity

Birth

Date Time

Place String

1

From Forms to Classes (a “decompression”)

13

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

Address

Patient

Name String

has

has

has

Knowledge RepresentationFrom Forms to Classes (a “decompression”)

Weight: Similar but not shared!

Multiple units, measurements

Dependent, but distinct entity

What about the name?

Birth

Date Time

Place String

1

Patient’s Weight1

14

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

Address

Patient

has

has

has

has

Knowledge RepresentationFrom Forms to Classes (a “decompression”)

Name: Shared

Context specific

Independent entity

Who is the Patient then?

Birth

Date Time

Place String

1

Patient’s Weight1

Name

String

15

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

Summary: In the end, no “private” attributes left over.

Widening/ change of context reveals them as hidden, distinct entities.

The “table” becomes a graph of related, but distinct entities, a MODEL

Things are only identified by unique keys – and the knowledge of the reality!

Do we describe a reality now? Are we closer to reality? Do we agree that this is correct? (“Ontological commitment”).

For a database schema, a projection (birth!) of perceived reality can be sufficient and more efficient.

For exchange of knowledge, it is misleading.

For a database schema, it can hinder extension.

Knowledge RepresentationFrom Forms to Classes (a “decompression”)

16

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

In KR we call these distinct entities classes: A class is a category of items that share one or more common traits serving as

criteria to identify the items belonging to the class. These properties need not be explicitly formulated in logical terms, but may be

described in a text (here called a scope note) that refers to a common conceptualisation of domain experts.

The sum of these traits is called the intension of the class. A class may be the domain or range of none, one or more properties formally defined in a model.

The formally defined properties need not be part of the intension of their domains or ranges: such properties are optional. An item that belongs to a class is called an instance of this class.

The set of instances is called the extension.

Knowledge RepresentationClasses and Instances

17

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

DoctorDoctor PatientPatient

George 1George 1Costas 65Costas 65

WeightWeight

AddressAddress

Odos Evans 6.Odos Evans 6.GR71500 Heraklion, GR71500 Heraklion,

Crete, GreeceCrete, Greece

?

instance

property

Knowledge RepresentationClasses and Instances

weighs

dwells at

In KR, instances are independent units of models, not a restricted to the records of one table.

Identity is separated from description.

We can do “multiple instantiation”.

What have doctors and patients in common?

85 Kg85 Kg

18

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

DoctorDoctor PatientPatient

George 1George 1Costas 65Costas 65

PersonPerson

Physical ObjectPhysical Object WeightWeight

AddressAddressdwells at

weighs

isA

Knowledge RepresentationGeneralization and Inheritance

Odos Evans 6.Odos Evans 6.GR71500 Heraklion, GR71500 Heraklion,

Crete, GreeceCrete, Greece

85 Kg85 Kg

subclass

superclass

An instance of a class is an instance of all its superclasses.

A subclass inherits the properties of all superclasses. (properties “move up”)

19

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM Knowledge RepresentationOntology and Information Systems

An ontology is a logical theory accounting for the intended meaning of a formal vocabulary, i.e. its ontological commitment to a particular conceptualization of the world. The intended models* of a logical language using such a vocabulary are constrained by its ontological commitment. An ontology indirectly reflects this commitment (and the underlying conceptualization) by approximating these intended models.

Nicola Guarino, Formal Ontology and Information Systems, 1998.

* “models” are meant as models of possible states of affairs.

Ontologies pertains to a perceived truth: A model commits to a conceptualization, typically of a group, how we imagine things in the world are related.

An ontology can be implemented on a database, e.g, with RDF, OWL, but such a schema is no more a “pure” ontology.

20

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMTerminology and Information Systems

We define as terminology (vocabulary) as a system of named universals (classes) which is used in an information system as data

i.e., their use does not depend or imply instance relationships that hold only between these the terms or their specializations.

e.g., has_type : “car”, has_type : “wheel” is not used to say in which position of this car this wheel is mounted.

Terminological systems are organized in KOS, typically with specialization/generalization hierarchies, and categorical relations (such as: cars –have parts – wheels)

For us (FORTH-ISL, CRM-SIG), terminological systems are not ontologies!

21

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMCIDOC CRM

22

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMChallenge: Integrating Special and General…

Access all data from any levelby property generalization

Dublin Core

CDWA

MIDAS

Data

Few concepts,high recall

Special concepts,high precision

automatic data export

CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM)

ThingActor

Event

Acquisition

was present at

used object

happened at

23

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMBut how to find the Global Schema?

Foresight: We started 1994-1996 with CIDOC/ICOM Documentation Standards Working Group Convinced Group to use new technology => compatible to the later RDF/RDFS/OWL! Addressed challenge: integrating poor and rich schemata to built the connection layer Proactive, in order to be ahead of industrial solutions.

Problem (2) to solve: What are the shared concepts?

The simple idea of the CIDOC CRM: Use existing schemata in use as evidence for underlying concepts and

discourse restriction!! Describe only facts, that are relevant across documents. Deal with terminology as data! Explaining data needs less words than a questionnaire. The data in the collection layer are already checked for plausibility and completeness.

24

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMHistorical Archives…

Type: TextTitle: Protocol of Proceedings of Crimea Conference Title.Subtitle: II. Declaration of Liberated Europe Date: February 11, 1945Creator: The Premier of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom The President of the United States of AmericaPublisher: State DepartmentSubject: Postwar division of Europe and Japan

“The following declaration has been approved:The Premier of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and the President of the United States of America have consulted with each other in the common interests of the people of their countries and those of liberated Europe. They jointly declare their mutual agreement to concert… ….and to ensure that Germany will never again be able to disturb the peace of the world…… “

DocumentsMetadata

About…

25

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM Images, non-verbose…

Type: ImageTitle: Allied Leaders at Yalta Date: 1945Publisher: United Press International (UPI)Source: The Bettmann ArchiveCopyright: CorbisReferences: Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin Photos, Persons

Metadata

About…

26

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM Places and Objects

TGN Id: 7012124Names: Yalta (C,V), Jalta (C,V) Types: inhabited place(C), city (C)Position: Lat: 44 30 N,Long: 034 10 EHierarchy: Europe (continent) <– Ukrayina (nation) <– Krym (autonomous republic)Note: …Site of conference between Allied powers in WW II in 1945; ….Source: TGN, Thesaurus of Geographic Names

Places, Objects

About…

Title: Yalta, Crimean PeninsulaPublisher: Kurgan-LisnetSource: Liaison Agency

27

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMExplicit Events, Object Identity, Symmetry

P14 performed

P11 participated in

P94 has created

E31 Document“Yalta Agreement”

E7 Activity

“Crimea Conference”

E65 Creation Event

*

E38 Image

P86 falls within

P7 took place at

P67 is referred to by

E52 Time-Span

February 1945

P81 ongoing throughout

P82 at some time within

E39 Actor

E39 Actor

E39 Actor

E53 Place7012124

E52 Time-Span

1945-02-1128

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMOutcomes

The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model A collaboration with the International Council of Museums An ontology of 86 classes and 137 properties for culture and more With the capacity to explain hundreds of (meta)data formats Accepted by ISO TC46 in September 2000 International standard since 2006 - ISO 21127:2006 To be revised 2014 (minor extensions)

Serving as:

intellectual guide to create schemata, formats, profiles

A language for analysis of existing sources for integration/ mediation

“Identify elements with common meaning”

Transportation format for data integration / migration / Internet

29

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMThe Intellectual Role of the CRM

Legacy systems

Legacy systems

Databases

World Phenomena

?

Data structures &Presentation models

Conceptualization

abstracts fromapproximates

explains,motivates

organize

refer to

Data in various forms 30

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMEncoding of the CIDOC CRM

The CIDOC CRM is a formal ontology (defined in TELOS) But CRM instances can be encoded in many forms: RDBMS, ooDBMS, XML,

RDF(S)

Uses Multiple isA – to achieve uniqueness of properties in the schema

Uses multiple instantiation – to be able to combine not always valid combinations (e.g. destruction – activity)

Uses Multiple isA for properties to capture different abstraction of relationships

Methodological aspects: Entities are introduced as anchors of properties (and if structurally relevant)

Frequent joins (short-cuts) of complex data paths for data found in different degrees of detail are modeled explicitly

31

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMData example (RDF-like form)

Epitaphios GE34604 (entity E22 Man-Made Object) P30 custody transferred through, P24 changed ownership through

Transfer of Epitaphios GE34604 (entity E10 Transfer of Custody, E8 Acquisition Event) P28 custody surrendered by

Metropolitan Church of the Greek Community of Ankara (entity E39 Actor) P23 transferred title from

Metropolitan Church of the Greek Community of Ankara (entity E39 Actor) P29 custody received by

Museum Benaki (entity E39 Actor) P22 transferred title to

Exchangeable Fund of Refugees (entity E40 Legal Body) P2 has type national foundation (entity E55 Type)

P14 carried out by Exchangeable Fund of Refugees (entity E39 Actor)

P4 has time-span GE34604_transfer_time (entity E52 Time-Span)

P82 at some time within 1923 – 1928 (entity E61 Time Primitive)

P7 took place at Greece (entity E53 Place)

P2 has type nation (entity E55 Type) republic (entity E55 Type)P89 falls within Europe (entity E53 Place) P2 has type

continent (entity E55 Type)

TGN data

Multiple Instantiation

32

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMTop-level classes useful for integration

participate in

E39 Actors

E55 Types

E28 Conceptual Objects

E18 Physical Thing

E2 Temporal Entities

E41

Ap

pel

lati

ons

affect or / refer to

refer to / refine

refe

r to

/ i d

ent i f

y

location

atwithinE53 Places

E52 Time-Spans

33

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

The types of relationships

Identification of real world items by real world names

Observation and Classification of real world items

Part-decomposition and structural properties of Conceptual & Physical

Objects, Periods, Actors, Places and Times

Participation of persistent items in temporal entities

creates a notion of history: “world-lines” meeting in space-time

Location of periods in space-time and physical objects in space

Influence of objects on activities and products and vice-versa

Reference of information objects to any real-world item

34

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMThe E2 Temporal Entity Hierarchy

E2 Temporal Entity

E5 Event E63 Beginning of Existence

E7 Activity

E69 Death

E6 Destruction

E87 Curation Activity

E83 Type Creation

E13 Attribute Assignment

E86 Leaving

E80 Part Removal

E 79 Part Addition

Generalization

E64 End of Existence

E10 Transfer of Custody

E15 Identifier Assignment

E4 Period

E3 Condition State

E68 Dissolution

E81 Transformation

E67 Birth

E66 Formation

E65 Creation

E11 Modification

E9 Move

E8 Acquisition

E85 Joining

E12 Production

E17 Type Assignment

E14 Condition Assessment

E16 Measurement

35

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMScope note example: E2 Temporal Entity

E2 Temporal EntityScope Note:

This class comprises all phenomena, such as the instances of E4 Periods, E5 Events and states, which happen over a limited extent in time.

In some contexts, these are also called perdurants. This class is disjoint from E77 Persistent Item. This is an abstract class and has no direct instances. E2 Temporal Entity is specialized into E4 Period, which applies to a particular geographic area (defined with a greater or lesser degree of precision), and E3 Condition State, which applies to instances of E18 Physical Thing.

Comments: E2 is limited in time, is the only link to time, but is not time itself spreads out over a place or object the core of a model of physical history, open for unlimited specialisation

36

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM Temporal Entity-Main Properties

E2 Temporal Entity Properties: P4 has time-span (is time-span of): E52 Time-Span

E4 Period Properties: P7 took place at (witnessed): E53 Place P9 consists of (forms part of): E4 Period P10 falls within (contains): E4 Period

E5 Event Properties: P12 occurred in the presence of (was present at): E77 Persistent Item

P11 had participant (participated in): E39 Actor

E7 Activity Properties: P14 carried out by (performed): E39 Actor

P20 had specific purpose (was purpose of): E5 Event P21 had general purpose (was purpose of): E55 Type

P16 used specific object (was used for): E70 Thing P125 used object of type (was type of object used in) E55

Type

37

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMThe Participation Properties

P12 occurred in the presence of (was present at)

P16 used specific object (was used for)

P25 moved (moved by)

P33 used specific technique (was used by)

P142 used constituent (was used in)

P143 joined (was joined by)

P144 joined with (gained member by)

P145 separated (left by)

P124 transformed (was transformed by)

P110 augmented (was augmented by)

P112 diminished (was diminished by)

P95 has formed (was formed by)

P22 transferred title to (acquired title through)

P23 transferred title from (surrendered title through)

P135 created type (was created by)

Generalization

P31 has modified (was modified by)

P146 separated from (lost member by)

P28 custody surrendered by (surrendered custody through)

P11 had participant (participated in)

P93 took out of existence (was taken out of existence by)

P92 brought into existence (was brought into existence by)

P96 by mother (gave birth)

P14 carried out by (performed)

P99 dissolved (was dissolved by)

P13 destroyed (was destroyed by)

P100 was death of (died in)

P108 has produced (was produced by)

P123 resulted in (resulted from)

P98 brought into life (was born)

P94 has created (was created by)

P29 custody received by (received custody through)

38

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMHistorical Events as Meetings

SS

tt

CaesaCaesar’s r’s mothemotherr

CaesCaesarar

BrutBrutusus

BrutuBrutus’ s’ daggedaggerr

““coherence coherence volume” of volume” of Caesar’s deathCaesar’s death

““coherence coherence volume” of volume” of Caesar’s birthCaesar’s birth

was present at! was present at! was present at!

was present at!

was present at!

? Forum ? Forum Romanum, RomeRomanum, Rome

39

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMDepositional events as meetings

SS

tt

ancientancientSantoriniSantorinianan househouse

lava andlava andruinsruins

volcanovolcano

coherence coherence volume of volume of volcano eruptionvolcano eruption

coherence coherence volume of volume of house house buildingbuilding

Santorini - AkrotitiSantorini - Akrotiti 40

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMExchanges of information as meetings

tt

SS

runnrunnerer

11stst AthenianAthenian

coherence volume coherence volume of first of first announcementannouncement

coherence volume coherence volume of the battle of of the battle of Marathon Marathon

MarathonMarathon

otherotherSoldiersSoldiers

AthensAthens

22ndnd AthenianAthenian

coherence volume coherence volume of second of second announcementannouncement

Victory!Victory!!!!!

Victory!Victory!!!!!

41

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

SS

tt

operatoperatoror

11stst ComputerComputer

coherence volume coherence volume of mesh-creationof mesh-creation

coherence coherence volume of volume of acquisitionacquisition

MuseumMuseum

museumuseummobjectobject

It-LabIt-Lab

22ndnd ComputerComputer

coherence coherence volume of volume of renderingrendering

scan-scan-datadata

3D 3D modelmodel

3D Model Creation as Meetings

scannscannerer

mesh-mesh-datadata

42

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMNetworks of Historical of Knowledge

space

time “LAOKOON”(copy)

(in Vatican museum)

Winkelmann

“…noble simplicity,silent grandeur…”

(in a library)

Winkelmann’sbirth

Winkelmann’sdeath

Winkelmannsees “Laokoon”

Winkelmannwrites….

Winkelmann’smother

unknown Romancopies “Laokoon”

“LAOKOON”

unknown Roman

Greece Rome Germany

(archive information?)

(archive information?)

Published Inference

(in a library?)

1755

43

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMTime Uncertainty, Certainty and Duration

time

before

P82 at some time within

P81 ongoing throughout

after

“in

ten

sity

Duration (P83,P84)

44

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRME7 Activity and inherited properties

E55 Type

E1 CRM EntityE62 String

E7 Activity

P3 has note

P2 has type (is type of)

0,1 0,n 0,n

0,n

E5 Event

E55 Type

P3.1 has type

E59 Primitive Value

E39 ActorP14 carried out by(performed)

1,n0,n

P14.1 in the role of

E.g., “Field Collection”

E55 Type E.g., “photographer”

Generalization

property

IndirectGeneralization

45

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMActivities: E16 Measurement

P140 assigned attribute to(was attribute by)

E16 Measurement

E13 Attribute Assignment

E70 Thing E54 Dimension

P43 has dimension(is dimension of)

0,n 1,1

1,n 0,n1,10,n

P39 measured(was measured by)

P40 observed dimension(was observed in)

0,nP141 assigned

(was assigned by)

0,n

E1 CRM Entity

0,n

E1 CRM Entity

0,n

E58 Measurement Unit E60 Number

P90 has value

1,1

0,n

P91 has unit(is unit of)

1,1

0,nShortcut

Generalization

property

IndirectGeneralization

46

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRME53 Place

E53 Place A place is an extent in space, determined diachronically with regard to a larger, persistent

constellation of matter, often continents -

by coordinates, geophysical features, artefacts, communities, political systems, objects - but not identical to

A “CRM Place” is not a landscape, not a seat - it is an abstraction from temporal changes - “the place where…”

A means to reason about the “where” in multiple reference systems. Examples:

figures from the bow of a ship African dinosaur foot-prints appearing in Portugal by continental drift where Nelson died

47

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMProperties of E53 Place

P59 has section

(is located on or within)

P53 has former or current location

(is former or current location of )

P8 took place on or within (witnessed)

E45 AddressE48 Place Name

E47 Spatial Coordinates

E46 Section Definition E18 Physical Thing

E44 Place Appellation

E53 Place

P88 consists of (forms part of)

P58 has section definition (defines section)

E9 Move

P26 moved to (was destination of)

P27 moved from (was origin of)

P25 moved (moved by)

E12 Production

P108 has produced (was pro duced by)

P7 took place at (witnessed)

E24 Physical Man-Made ThingE19 Physical Object

E4 Period1,n

0,n

1,n

1,1

1,n

0,n

1,n

1,n

0,n0,n

1,n

0,n

0,n

0,1

0,n

0,n

0,n

0,n

1,1 0,n

P87 is identified by (identifies)

0,n

0,n

P89 falls within (contains)

0,n

0,n

Where was Lord Nelson’s ring when he died?

48

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

49

Activities: E9 Move

P54 has current permanent location (is current permanent location of)

E18 Physical Thing

E7 Activity

E9 Move

E53 Place E19 Physical Object

P53 has former or current location (is former or current location of)

P55 has current location (currently holds)

P26 moved to (was destination of)

1,n

0,n 0,n

0,n

0,n

1,n

0,1

0,n

1,n

1,nP27 moved from (was origin of)

P25 moved (moved by)

E55 TypeP21 had general purpose(was purpose of)

0,n 0,n

P20 had specific purpose(was purpose of) 0,n

0,n

0,n 0,1

E5 PeriodP7 took place at

(witnessed)1,n

0,n

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

50

An Instance of E9 Move

P59B

has section

P26 moved to P27 moved from

P25 moved

P25 moved

P27 moved from

E19 Physical ObjectSpanair EC-IYG

E9 Move

Flight JK126

E9 MoveMy walk

16-9-2006 13:45

P26 moved to

E53 Place

Madrid Airport

E20 PersonMartin Doerr

E53 Place

EC-IYG seat 4A

E53 PlaceFrankfurt

Airport-B10

How I came to Madrid…

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMActivities: E11 Modification/E12 Production

E57 MaterialE29 Design or Procedure

E24 Physical Man-Made Thing

E55 Type

E18 Physical Thing

E12 Production

E11 Modification

E7 Activity

P68 usually employs(is usually employed by)

0,n 0,n

P126 employed(was employed in)

0,n 0,n

1,n

0,n

0,n

0,n

0,n

0,n

1,n

0,n

1,n

1,1

P108 has produced(was produ ced by)

P31 has modified(was mod ified by)

P33 used specific technique (was used by)

P45 co nsists of(is incor porated in)

0,n 0,n

P69 is associated with

0,n0,n

P32 used general technique(was technique of)

Things may be different from

their plans

Materialsmay be lost

or altered

P16 used specific object (was used for) E70 Thing

P125 used object of type (was type of object used in)

51

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM Ways of Changing Things

E18 Physical Thing

E11 Modification

P111 added (was added by)

E80 Part Removal

P110 augmented (was augmented by)

E24 Ph. M.-Made Thing

P113 removed

(was removed by)

P112 diminished (was diminished by)

E77 Persistent ItemE81 Transformation

E64 End of Existence E63 Beginning of Existence

P124 transformed (was transformed by)

P123 resulted in(resulted from)

P92 brought into existence(was brought into existence by)

P93 took out of existence(was taken o.o.e. by)

P31 has modified(was modified by)

E79 Part Addition

52

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRME70 Thing

E37 Mark

E70 Thing

E24 Physical M-M Thing

E28 Conceptual Object

E27 Site

E25 Man-Made Feature

E57 Material

E21 Person

E44 Place Appellation

E32 Authority Document

E46 Section Definition

E38 Image

E29 Design or Procedure

E75 Conceptual Object Appellation

E55 Type

material

immaterial

E78 Collection

E84 Information Carrier

E73 Information Object

E30 Right

E50 Date

E82 Actor Appellation

Generalization

E72 Legal Object

E71 Man-Made Thing

E18 Physical Thing

E19Physical Object

E26 Physical Feature

E89 Propositional Object

E90 Symbolic Object

E42 Identifier

E49 Time Appellation

E51 Contact Point

E31 Document

E33 Linguistic Object

E36 Visual Item

E48 Place Name

47 Spatial Coordinates

E45 Address

E35 Title

E20 Biological Object

E22 Man-Made Object

E58 Measurement Unit

E56 Language

E41 Appellation

E34 Inscription

53

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMVisual Content and Subject

E24 Physical Man-Made Thing

E55 Type

E1 CRM Entity

P62 depicts

(is depicted by)

P62.1 mode of depiction

P65 shows visual item (is shown by)

E36 Visual Item

P138 represents(has representation)

E73 Information Object

E38 Image

P67 refers to (is referred to by)

E84 Information Carrier

P128 carries (is carried by)

P138.1 mode of depiction

E37 Mark

E34 Inscription54

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMApplication: Mapping DC to the CRM (1)

Example: DC Record about a Technical Report

Type: text

Title: Mapping of the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set to the CIDOC CRM

Creator: Martin Doerr

Publisher: ICS-FORTH

Identifier: FORTH-ICS / TR 274 July 2000

Language: English

55

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMApplication: Mapping DC to the CRM (2)

was created byis i

dentified by

E41 Appellation

Name: Mapping of the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set to the CIDOC CRM

E33 Linguistic Object

Object: FORTH-ICS /

TR-274 July 2000

E82 Actor Appellation

Name: Martin Doerr

E65 Creation

Event: 0001

carriedout by

is identified by

E82 Actor Appellation

Name: ICS-FORTH

E7 Activity

Event: 0002

carried out by

E55 Type

Type: Publication

has type

was used for

E75 Conceptual Object Appellation

Name: FORTH-ICS / TR-274 July 2000

E55 Type

Type:FORTH Identifier

has type

is identified by

E56 Language

Lang.: English

has language

E39 Actor

Actor:0001

E39 Actor

Actor:0002

is identified by

(background knowledge not in the DC record)

56

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

57

Work (CRM Core)Work (CRM Core)..Category = E84 Information CarrierClassification =sculpture (visual work) Classification =plasterIdentification =The Monument to Balzac (plaster)Description =Commissioned to honor one of France's greatest novelists, Rodin spent seven years preparing for Monument to Balzac. When the plaster original was exhibited in Paris in 1898, it was widely attacked. Rodin retired the plaster model to his home in the Paris suburbs. It was not cast in bronze until years after his death.Event Role in Event =P108B was produced by Identification= Rodin making Monument to Balzac in 1898 Event Type = E12 Production Participant Identification =Rodin, Auguste Identification =ID: 500016619 Participant Type = artists Participant Type = sculptors Date = 1898 Place = France (nation) Related event Role in Event =P134B was continued by Identification= Bronze casting Monument to Balzac in 1925Event Role in Event =P16B was used for

Identification= Bronze casting Monument to Balzac in 1925 Event Type = E12 Production Participant Identification =Rudier (Vve Alexis) et Fils Participant Type = companies Thing Present

Identification =The Monument to Balzac (S.1296) Thing Present Type =bronze

Thing Present Type =sculpture (visual work) Date = 1925 Related event Role in Event =P120B occurs after

Identification= Rodin's deathRelation To = Honore de Balzac Relation type refers to

Artist (CRM Core)Artist (CRM Core)..

Category = E21 Person

Classification = artists

Classification = sculptors

Identification =Rodin, Auguste

Identification =ID: 500016619

Event

Role in Event =P98B was born Identification= Rodin‘s birth Event Type = E67 Birth Date = 1840Event Role in Event =P100B died in Identification= Rodin‘s death Event Type = E69_Death Date = 1917 Related event Role in Event =P120 occurs before Identification= Bronze casting Monument to Balzac in 1925

CRM Core Instances

57

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

E52 Time-Span

1898

E53 Place

France (nation)

E21 Person

Auguste Rodin

E52 Time-Span

1840

E67 Birth

Rodin’s birth

E52 Time-Span

1917P4 has time-span

E69 DeathRodin’s death

E12 Production

Rodin making “Monument to Balzac” in 1898

E21 Person

Honoré de Balzac

E55 Type

sculptors

E84 Information Carrier

The “Monument to Balzac” (plaster)

E55 Type

plaster

E52 Time-Span

1925

E55 Type

bronze

E40 Legal BodyRudier (Vve Alexis)

et Fils

E12 Production

Bronze casting “Monument to

Balzac” in 1925

E55 Type

companies

E84 Information CarrierThe “Monument to

Balzac”(S1296)

P108B was produced by

P62 depicts

P16B was used for

P134 continuedP2 has type

P120B occurs after

P4 has time-span

P2 has type

P100B died in

P98B was born

P4 has time-span

P2 has type

P14 carried out by

P14 carried out by

P62 depicts

P108B was produced by

P2 has type

P7 took place atP4 has time-span

Merging metadata contents with CRM

58

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

Good ontologies can be extended without affecting interoperability. Semantic interoperability in cultural heritage can be achieved with an

“extensible ontology of relationships” and explicit event modeling The CRM provides a shared explanation rather than the prescription of a

common data structure. The ontology is the language that S/W developers and museum experts can

share. Therefore it needed interdisciplinary work. That is what CIDOC has provided.

59

Utility of the CIDOC CRM…

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM Background

60

Integrated Argumentation Model:

explicitly represents factual argumentation

connects argumentation and facts expressed in a domain ontology (data in an information system)

distinguishes the logical order from the temporal one

distinguishes a proposition and the belief in it

allows for describing composite inferences

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMIntegrated Argumentation Model

61

IAM connects epistemological elements

of argumentation with ontology

P14 carried out by

E52 Time-Span

Belief

has belief time

E2 Temporal Entity E52 Time-Span P4 has time-span

is believed by

Argumentation resulted in or confirms

Inference Making Belief Adoption

motivated

State

Observation

Questionis motivation of

Proposition

is Belief Value

that

(True, False, Unknown)

E39 Actor

P7 took place atE53 Place

E7 Activity

inherited property

property

IsA

Subjective!

Data Evaluation Simulation

Here is the Information System

andthe Ontology!

Here is the Researcher!

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMIntegrated Argumentation Model

Epistemological considerations:

Material facts: history as meetings of people, things and information. Material facts are supporting the discourse about possible pasts. Material facts are the most objective information we have. Material facts are carriers, evidence and constraints of the more vague and

subjective social/intellectual processes and their interpretations we do not model!

62

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMProposed Epistemological Core Model of Sciences

Categorical Models(terminologies)

Possible Worlds and mechanisms of evolution

Collective material behavior

Actual world

indata ormind

Material world(CRM)

Socio -Psychological

world

Factual worldFactual world

Observable worldObservable worldNon – discrete unlimited and

unclassified material phenomena

Reality

inferred

reco

gn

itio

n

Sta

tist

ical

reas

on

ing

Ind

uct

ive

reas

on

ing

Co

gn

itio

n

mo

del

s C

og

nit

ion

m

od

els

Inn

ate

or

exp

licit

Inn

ate

or

exp

licit

Collective psychologica

l behavior

Collective world viewCollective world viewD

edu

ctivereaso

nin

g

Ded

uctive

reason

ing

Reasoning are also real world activities (CRM) !!63

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

CRMsci v1.2

http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/CRMext/CRMsci.rdfs

Inspired by INSPIRE, OBOE….

64

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRM

E13 Attribute Assignment

S5 Inference Making

S4 Observation

S6 Data Evaluation

S8 Categorical Hypothesis Building

S7 Simulation or Prediction

S1 Matter Removal

S2 Sample Taking

E7 Activity

S19 Encounter Event

65

Scientific Events

E80 Part Removal

S3 Measurement by Sampling

S21 Measurement

E16 Measurement

E5 Event

S18 Alteration

S17 Physical Genesis

E12 Production

E63 Beginning of Existence

E11 Modification

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMObservable Entity

S10 Material Substantial

S14 Fluid Body S11 Amount of Matter

E70 Thing

E18 Physical Thing

S15 Observable Entity

E2 Temporal Entity

S13 Sample

66

S12 Amount of Fluid

E77 Persistent Item

E1 CRM Entity S15 Observable EntityScope Note:This class comprises instances of E2 Temporal Entity or E77 Persistent Item, i.e. items or phenomena that can be observed, either directly by human sensory impression, or enhanced with tools and measurement devices, such as physical things, their behavior, states and interactions or events.

S16 State

E3 Condition State

E55 Type

S9 Property Type

S20 / E26 Physical Feature

E53 Place

S22 Segment of MatterE27 SiteE25 Man-Made Feature

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMObservable Entity

S15 Observable EntityScope Note (cont’d): Conceptual objects can be present in events by their carriers such as books, digital media, or even human memory. By virtue of this presence, properties of conceptual objects, such as number of words can be observed on their carriers. If the respective properties between carriers differ, either they carry different instances of conceptual objects or the difference can be attributed to accidental deficiencies in one of the carriers. In that sense even immaterial objects are observable. By this model we give credit to the fact that frequently, the actually observed carriers of conceptual objects are not explicitly identified in documentation, i.e., the actual carrier is assumed having existed but is unknown as an individual.

67

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMObservable Entity

E13 Attribute Assignment

S5 Inference Making

S4 Observation

S6 Data Evaluation

E7 Activity

68E54 Dimension

O9 observed property type

S9 Property Type

O10 assigned dimensionS15 Observable Entity

O12 has dimension

O11 described

E55 Type

O16 observed value

E1 CRM Entity

E16 Measurement

O24 measured

E1 CRM Entity

S19 Encounter Event

P39 measured

O8 observedS21 Measurement

P140 assigned attribute to

E53 Place

E18 Physical ThingO21 has found at

O19 has found object

P141 assigned

P40 observed dimension

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMEncounter Event

S4 Observation

E7 Activity

69

E16 Measurement

S19 Encounter EventS21 Measurement

E53 Place E18 Physical Thing

O21 has found at O19 has found object

S20 / E26 Physical Feature

E27 SiteE25 Man-Made Feature S22 Segment of Matter

O22 partly or completely contains

E92 Spacetime Volume

O23 is defined by

S19 Encounter EventScope Note:Activities of S4 Observation (substance) where an E39 Actor encounters an instance of E18 Physical Thing of a kind relevant for the mission of the observation or regarded as potentially relevant for some community (identity). This observation produces knowledge about the existence of the respective thing at a particular place in or on surrounding matter. This knowledge may be new to the group of people the actor belongs to. In that case we would talk about a discovery.

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMMatter Removal

S10 Material Substantial

S14 Fluid BodyS11 Amount of Matter

E70 Thing

E18 Physical Thing

S19 Observable Entity

S1 Matter Removal

O5 removed

S2 Sample Taking

S13 Sample

E7 Activity

O3 sampled from

O1 diminished

S1 Matter RemovalScope Note:Activities that result in an instance of S10 Material Substantial being decreased by the removal of an amount of matter.

O2 removed

70

E53 Place

O4 sampled at

E55 Type

O20 sampled from type of part

E2 Temporal EntityE77 Persistent Item

O7 contains or confines

O15 occupied

P156 occupies

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMMatter Removal

S1 Matter RemovalScope Note (cont’d):Typical scenarios include the:

removal of a component or piece of a physical object

removal of an archaeological or geological layer

taking a tissue sample from a body or a sample of fluid from a body of water

The removed matter may acquire a persistent identity of different nature beyond the act of its removal, such as becoming a physical object in the narrower sense. Such cases should be modeled by using multiple instantiation with adequate concepts of creating the respective items.

71

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMAmount of Matter & Sample

S11 Amount of Matter Scope Note:This class comprises fixed amounts of matter specified as some air, some water, some soil, etc., defined by the total and integrity of their material content.

72

S13 SampleScope Note:This class comprises instances of S11 Amount of Matter taken from some instance of S10 Material Substantial with the intention to be representative for some material qualities of the instance of S10 Material Substantial or part of it it was taken from for further analysis. We typically regard a sample as ceasing to exist when the respective representative qualities become corrupted, such as the purity of a water sample or the layering of a bore core.

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMSample Taking

S2 Sample TakingScope Note:This class comprises the activity that results in taking an amount of matter as sample for further analysis from a material substantial such as a body of water, a geological formation or an archaeological object. The removed matter may acquire a persistent identity of different nature beyond the act of its removal, such as becoming a physical object in the narrower sense. The sample is typically removed from a physical feature which is used as a frame of reference, the place of sampling. In case of non-rigid Material Substantials, the source of sampling may regarded not to be modified by the activity of sample taking.

73

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMMaterial Substantial

S10 Material Substantial

S14 Fluid BodyS11 Amount of Matter E18 Physical Thing

S1 Matter Removal

S2 Sample Taking

E7 Activity

O3 sampled from

O1 diminished

O2 removed

74

E53 Place

O4 sampled at

E55 Type

O20 sampled from type of part

O15 occupied

P156 occupies

P46 is composed of

E3 Condition State

E57 Material

O7 contains or confines

P44 has condition

P45 consists of

S12 Amount of Fluid

O6 forms former or current part

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMMaterial Substantial

S10 Material SubstantialScope Note:This class comprises constellations of matter with a relative stability of any form sufficient to associate them with a persistent identity, such as being confined to certain extent, having a relative stability of form or structure, or containing a fixed amount of matter . In particular, it comprises physical things in the narrower sense and fluid bodies. It is an abstraction of physical substance for solid and non-solid things of matter.  GH2: Should we add „at a specific time“? without the time I have troubles understanding the „relative stability of any form”  

75

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMPhysical Genesis

S18 Alteration

E18 Physical Thing

S17 Physical Genesis

E63 Beginning of Existence

S17 Physical GenesisScope Note:Events or processes that result in (generate) physical things, man-made or natural, coming into being in the form by which they are later identified. The creation of a new physical item, at the same time, can be a result of an alteration (modification) – it can become a new thing due to an alteration activity.

E12 Production

E5 Event

E11 Modification

O17 generated

E24 Physical Man-Made Thing

O18 altered

P31 has modified

O13 triggers

S16 State O14 initializes

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMPart of Scientific Observation Model

E13 Attribute Assignment

E55 Type

S5 Inference Making

S4 Observation

S10 Material Substantial

S14 Fluid BodyS11 Amount of Matter

E54 Dimension

E18 Physical Thing

P2 has type

S9 Property Type

O8 observed

S6 Data Evaluation

S8 Categorical Hypothesis Building

S7 Simulation or Prediction

S15 Observable Entity

O11 described

S1 Matter Removal

O5 removed

S2 Sample Taking

S13 Sample

E7 Activity

S19 Encounter Event

O19 has found object

O10 assigned dimension

O12 has dimension

77

O9 observed property type

O16 observed value

E1 CRM Entity

E55 Type

S21 Measurement

E55 Type

O20 sampled from type of part

E53 Place

O3 sampled from

O2 removed

O1 diminished

O24 measured

S12 Amount of Fluid

O6 forms former or current part of

O15 occupied

O4 sampled at

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMApplications

Informed by the IAM model (argumentation)

EU FP7 - PSP InGeoCloudso European Space Agency: satellite data

EU FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2012-1 ARIADNEo Supermodel for CRMarchaeo

EU - FP7 - CP & CSA iMarineo Informs and complements MarineTLOo Extended MarineTLO used in LifeWatch Greece, being promoted to

LifeWatch

78

IFORTH-ICS May 2014

CRMarchaeo:

Modelling Context, Stratigraphic Unit, Excavated Matter

CRMarchaeo

Center for Cultural Informatics, Institute of Computer Science

Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas

Martin Doerr

Rethymnon, CreteFebruary 17-28, 2014

RESTeCH I

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMExcavation Process Unit

A1 Excavation Process Unit

E7 Activity

S11 Amount of Matter

E29 Design or Procedure

P33 used specific technique

P32 used general technique

P17 was motivated by

E73 Information Object

P125 used object of type

P32 used general technique

E55 Type

E55 Type

P13 destroyed

E26 Physical Feature

AP4 produced surface

Substance: doingIdentity: Actor, location, temporal coherenceUnity: begin/end (maybe documented)Intentional, Declarative

E55 Type

P21 had general purpose

SP2 Phenomenal Place

AP3 excavated

SP6 Declarative Place

S11 Amount of Matter

AP2 discarded intoAP1 produced

“find Solomon’s Temple”

“a heap”“a basket”

preserved part or total of matter

Q11 approximates

P67 refers to

A9 Segment of Matter

A8 Stratigraphic Unit

AP5 cut

tools

methodology

technique

research question

S10 Material Substantial

“surface”

3D excavated area

planned areafor drawings before excavating

about where to excavate

segment of Matter that happened to be at the excavated place

AP21 occupied

E55 Type

80

S40 Encounter Event

P9 consists of

A3 Stratigraphic Interface

AP6 intended to approximate

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMExcavation Process Unit

A1 Excavation Process UnitScope Note:

This class comprises activities of excavating in the sense of archaeology which are documented as a coherent set of actions of progressively recording and removing matter from a pre-specified location under specific rules.

Typically, an excavation process unit would be terminated if significant discontinuities of substance or finds come to light, or if the activity should be interrupted due to external factors, such as end of a working day. In other cases, the termination would be based on predefined physical specifications, such as the boundaries of a maximal volume of matter intended to be excavated in one unit of excavation.

Depending on the methodology, an instance of A1 Excavation Process Unit may intend to remove matter only within the boundaries of a particular stratigraphic unit, or it may follow a pre-declared spatial extent such as a trench. It may only uncover, clean or expose a structure or parts of it.

The process of excavation results in the production of a set of recorded (documentation) data that should be sufficient to provide researchers enough information regarding the consistence and spatial distribution of the excavated Segment of Matter and things and features embedded in it. Some parts or all of the removed physical material (S11 Amount of Matter) may be dispersed, whereas others may be kept in custody in the form of finds or samples, while others (such as parts of walls) may be left at the place of their discovery.

The data produced by an instance of excavation process unit should pertain to the material state of matter at excavation time only and should well be distinguished from subsequent interpretation about the causes for this state of matter.

81

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMStratigraphic Genesis

A1 Excavation Process Unit

E7 Activity

A8 Stratigraphic Unit

A3 Stratigraphic Interface

A4 Stratigraphic Genesis S10 Material Substantial

S11 Amount of Matter

AP1 produced

AP7 produced

AP9 took matter from

82

A5 Stratigraphic Modification EventS38 Physical Genesis

E26 Physical Feature

AP13 has stratigraphic relation

AP8 disturbed

A2 Stratigraphic Deposit Unit

AP12 is confined by

E63 Beginning of ExistenceS39 Alteration

A9 Segment of Matter

E18 Physical Thing

AP24 is or contains remains of

AP11 has physical relationAP10 is part of

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMStratigraphic Genesis

A4 Stratigraphic GenesisScope Note: A process resulting in the displacement of a limited amount of matter which has settled into a relatively stable form, often a deposition, consisting of homogeneous parts. Typology of processes.

83

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMEmbedding

A7 Embedding

E3 Condition State

E18 Physical Thing

E5 Event

AP17 is found by

“state, refinement of position”

“reference space that is relative to the Context Stuff”

“positioning”

AP15 has found object

“the Physical Object has a position at least up to the point of discovery”

A1 Excavation Process Unit

P9 consists of

84

S40 Encounter Event

AP19 is embedding inAP20 is embedding atAP18 is embedding of

A2 Stratigraphic Deposit UnitSP6 Declarative Place

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMEmbedding

S40 Encounter EventScope Note:

This class compromises activities of S4 Observation (S) where an E39 Actor encounters an instance of E18 Physical Thing of a kind relevant for the mission of the observation or regarded as potentially relevant for some community (I). This observation produces knowledge about the existence of the respective thing at a particular place in or on surrounding matter. This knowledge may be new to the group of people the actor belongs to. In that case we would talk about a discovery. The observer may recognize or assign an individual identity of the thing encountered or regard only the type as noteworthy in the associated documentation or report.

In archaeology there is a particular interest if an object is found “in situ”, i.e. if its embedding in the surrounding matter supports the assumption that the object was not moved since the archaeologically relevant deposition event. The surrounding matter with the relative position of the object in it as well as the absolute position and time of the observation may be recorded in order to enable inferences about the history of the E18 Physical Thing.

85

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMEmbedding

A7 EmbeddingScope Note:

This class comprises the states of E18 Physical Things during their complete or partial embedding in one or more A2 Stratigraphic Deposit Units. The condition state can be documented directly through the property chain

E18 Physical Thing ->AP18 is embedding of (is embedded) ->A7 Embedding -> AP19 is embedding in (contains embedding) -> A2 Stratigraphic Deposit Unit (surrounding matter)

or positioning methods that document the position of an object within the surrounding matter at a specific time.

86

FORTH-ICS February 2014

CIDOC CRMConclusions

CRM Sci provides a comprehensive model for observation metadata regardless science and method.

CRMArchaeo allows for a common representation of archaeological records and survey data, widely independent of local methodology.

Still to be done: Specializations into analytical methods and reference data sets.

Links: CRMarchaeo will be available soon at http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/CRMext/CRMarchaeo.rdfs

87