ifrs for smes: views of ifac capa osaka conference, osaka, october 5, 2007 sylvie voghel chair, ifac...

14
IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee Committee

Upload: violet-moody

Post on 03-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC

CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007

Sylvie Voghel Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices

CommitteeCommittee

Page 2: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

1 General Observations1 General Observations

• SME and SMP topping agenda SME and SMP topping agenda • Concerns over regulatory overloadConcerns over regulatory overload• Standards lack relevance to SME/SMP…Standards lack relevance to SME/SMP…• ……and SME/SMP lack ability to efficiently complyand SME/SMP lack ability to efficiently comply• IFAC SMP CommitteeIFAC SMP Committee• Ensure standards reflect SME/SMPEnsure standards reflect SME/SMP• Succinct, relevant, understandable guidanceSuccinct, relevant, understandable guidance

Page 3: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

2 IFRS for SMEs2 IFRS for SMEsIntroductionIntroduction

• IFAC has closely tracked and input since startIFAC has closely tracked and input since start• Globally applicable standard, consistently Globally applicable standard, consistently

implementedimplemented• Ease compliance burden on preparersEase compliance burden on preparers• Ensure benefits exceed costEnsure benefits exceed cost• Release of ED is milestoneRelease of ED is milestone• IFAC supports project & committed to assisting IFAC supports project & committed to assisting

IASB secure optimal outcomeIASB secure optimal outcome

Page 4: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

2 IFRS for SMEs2 IFRS for SMEsIFAC’s RoleIFAC’s Role

• Encouraged member bodies, regional accountancy Encouraged member bodies, regional accountancy organizations to contribute to debateorganizations to contribute to debate

• Promoted conduct of field tests – more member Promoted conduct of field tests – more member bodies need to joinbodies need to join

• Getting SMEs and SMPs engaged Getting SMEs and SMPs engaged • Responding to EDResponding to ED• Pragmatic approach – focus on major thingsPragmatic approach – focus on major things

Page 5: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

2 IFRS for SMEs2 IFRS for SMEsIFAC Comment LetterIFAC Comment Letter

11 Recognition & measurement simplifications:Recognition & measurement simplifications:• Elimination of deferred taxElimination of deferred tax

• Amortization of goodwillAmortization of goodwill

• Simplified impairment testsSimplified impairment tests

• Modifications to financial assets and liabilitiesModifications to financial assets and liabilities

Page 6: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

2 IFRS for SMEs2 IFRS for SMEsIFAC Comment LetterIFAC Comment Letter

22 Eliminate Eliminate allall cross references: cross references:• Remove altogether certain topics – Remove altogether certain topics – segment segment

reporting, EPS and interim reportingreporting, EPS and interim reporting

• Remove most options – Remove most options – cost method only for cost method only for PP&E, intangibles, investment property & when PP&E, intangibles, investment property & when consolidating associates and joint venturesconsolidating associates and joint ventures

Page 7: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

2 IFRS for SMEs2 IFRS for SMEsIFAC Comment LetterIFAC Comment Letter

33 Cost-benefit overriding objectiveCost-benefit overriding objective

44 Restructure – topics not relevant to all at backRestructure – topics not relevant to all at back

55 Rationalize disclosures – focus on financial Rationalize disclosures – focus on financial positionposition

66 Post-implementation reviewPost-implementation review

77 Exclude very small entities with few external users Exclude very small entities with few external users

Page 8: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

3 Micro-Entity Financial Reporting3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 1Phase 1

• Concerns expressed at IFAC SMP ForumsConcerns expressed at IFAC SMP Forums• Project aim – to inform debateProject aim – to inform debate• Micro-Entity Financial Reporting: Perspectives Micro-Entity Financial Reporting: Perspectives

of Preparers and Users, of Preparers and Users, December 2006December 2006• Summary of existing research evidence Summary of existing research evidence • Lack of researchLack of research

Page 9: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

3 Micro-Entity Financial Reporting3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 2Phase 2

• FFocus group interviews of owners, financiers & ocus group interviews of owners, financiers & preparerspreparers

• Kenya, Italy, Poland, UK & UruguayKenya, Italy, Poland, UK & Uruguay• Investigates whether proposed IFRS for SMEs:Investigates whether proposed IFRS for SMEs:

• likely to meet needs of userslikely to meet needs of users• can be easily applied by preparerscan be easily applied by preparers

• What changes to ED What changes to ED maymay be necessary for it to be be necessary for it to be suitable for micro-entities?suitable for micro-entities?

Page 10: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

3 Micro-Entity Financial Reporting3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 2Phase 2

1.1. Mixed support for international guidance for Mixed support for international guidance for micro-entities micro-entities

2.2. ED too complex and long for micro-entitiesED too complex and long for micro-entities

3.3. Characteristics of any new guidance:Characteristics of any new guidance:• Simplicity, few rules, infrequent updates, short, & Simplicity, few rules, infrequent updates, short, &

applicable to allapplicable to all

Page 11: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

3 Micro-Entity Financial Reporting3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 2Phase 2

4.4. Outline content - general support for:Outline content - general support for:• Fixed format statements, simple disclosure checklist, Fixed format statements, simple disclosure checklist,

clear rules for common transactions, & statement of clear rules for common transactions, & statement of principlesprinciples

• Précis version for owners Précis version for owners andand longer one for longer one for preparers preparers

5.5. Internet Internet andand hard copy hard copy

Page 12: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

3 Micro-Entity Financial Reporting3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 2Phase 2

• Conclusions:Conclusions:• ED appears unsuitable for micro-entitiesED appears unsuitable for micro-entities

• Relatively minor changes to ED will not be Relatively minor changes to ED will not be sufficient for micro-entitiessufficient for micro-entities

• No clear case for separate tier of micro-entity No clear case for separate tier of micro-entity guidanceguidance

• Some form of assurance needed for micro-entity Some form of assurance needed for micro-entity financial reports financial reports

Page 13: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

4 Assurance Services for SMEs4 Assurance Services for SMEs

• Inappropriate for IFAC to dictate policyInappropriate for IFAC to dictate policy• If there is sufficient demand then IAASB should If there is sufficient demand then IAASB should

make available appropriate standardsmake available appropriate standards• SMP Committee welcomes IAASB proposals to:SMP Committee welcomes IAASB proposals to:

– Revise ISRE 2400 Revise ISRE 2400 Engagements to Review Financial Engagements to Review Financial Statements; Statements; andand

– Explore alternative assurance service and, if Explore alternative assurance service and, if appropriate, develop a standard if different from review appropriate, develop a standard if different from review

Page 14: IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

www.ifac.orgwww.ifac.org