igcesh2011.pdf

2
IGCESH2014 Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia 19-21 August 2014 ASSESSMENT PRACTICES OF SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS IN THE CLASSROOM: A PRELIMINARY REVIEW Norlly Mohd Isa * 1 Hamimah Abu Naim 2 and Rohaya Talib 3 1, 2,3 Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. ([email protected], [email protected], [email protected]) ABSTRACT This paper aimed to examine the implementation of Science Process Skills Assessment (SPSA) for Form 2 science subject in terms of dimensional context, input, process and product and its relationship with student’s level of mastery based on the model of CIPP. Evaluation in context dimensions is the assessment which carried out parallel with the implementation of SPSA in the classroom based on the policies, principles and methods. While for input dimensions, assessment was conducted by examining the provided input in terms of curriculum content, availability and competency of teachers, and infrastructure that help in the implementation of SPSA. The assessment of the process dimensions refer to the evaluation of the processes and implementation of SPSA by teachers in the classroom. The product dimensions evaluation emphasizes on the effectiveness of implementation of SPSA for each level of Science Process Skill (SPS). Qualitative and quantitative methods were used in this research. The qualitative data collected through interview protocol and checklist on related official documents. The interview will be conducted on selected teachers who are teaching Form 2 science subject. Quantitative method also used by using Science Process Skill Test (SPST) as an instrument to measure students' Science Process Skill prepared by researcher.

Upload: norlly-mohd-isa

Post on 16-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • IGCESH2014

    Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia 19-21 August 2014

    ASSESSMENT PRACTICES OF SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS IN THE

    CLASSROOM: A PRELIMINARY REVIEW

    Norlly Mohd Isa *1 Hamimah Abu Naim

    2 and Rohaya Talib

    3

    1, 2,3

    Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

    ([email protected], [email protected], [email protected])

    ABSTRACT

    This paper aimed to examine the implementation of Science Process Skills Assessment

    (SPSA) for Form 2 science subject in terms of dimensional context, input, process and

    product and its relationship with students level of mastery based on the model of CIPP.

    Evaluation in context dimensions is the assessment which carried out parallel with the

    implementation of SPSA in the classroom based on the policies, principles and methods.

    While for input dimensions, assessment was conducted by examining the provided input

    in terms of curriculum content, availability and competency of teachers, and infrastructure

    that help in the implementation of SPSA. The assessment of the process dimensions refer

    to the evaluation of the processes and implementation of SPSA by teachers in the

    classroom. The product dimensions evaluation emphasizes on the effectiveness of

    implementation of SPSA for each level of Science Process Skill (SPS).

    Qualitative and quantitative methods were used in this research. The qualitative data

    collected through interview protocol and checklist on related official documents. The

    interview will be conducted on selected teachers who are teaching Form 2 science subject.

    Quantitative method also used by using Science Process Skill Test (SPST) as an

    instrument to measure students' Science Process Skill prepared by researcher.

  • REFERENCES

    1. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2012a). Dasar Pendidikan Kebangsaan (Edisi Ketiga). Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

    2. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2012b). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia 2012. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

    3. Fatin Aliah Phang, & Nor Athirah Tahir. (2011). Kemahiran Proses Sains Dalam Kalangan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sains Di UTM. Journal of Science and Mathematics Educational, 3, 123133.

    4. Ghazali Darusalam. (2005). Kesahan Dan Kebolehpercayaan Dalam Kajian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Maktab Perguruan Islam, 5879.

    5. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.

    6. Khodori Ahmad. (2012). Kepemimpinan Pentaksiran Holistik Memacu Modal Insan Kreatif dan Inovatif. In Kolokium Pengurusan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Tahun 2012. Institud Aminuddin Baki.

    7. Mohamad Azhar Mat Ali, & Shahrir Jamaluddin. (2007). Amalan Pentaksiran Untuk Pembelajaran di Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan 2007, Jilid 27(1), 1939.

    8. Rose Amnah, Abd Rashid, Lilia Halim, & Siti Rahayah. (2004). Pemupukan Kemahiran Proses Sains di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Dua di Sekolah Bestari. Jurnal Teknologi, 40, 1931.

    9. Salawati Sahar, & Fatin Aliah Phang. (2011). Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains Bersepadu Dalam Ujian Amali Dan Ujian Bertulis Fizik Tingkatan 4. Journal of Edupres, 1, 301305

    10. Wynne Harlen. (1999) Purposes and Procedures for Assessing Science Process Skills, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6:1,129-144