ihs xii dubrovnik feb ‘10 indicators for safe and appropriate use of blood components rené r.p....
TRANSCRIPT
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Indicators for safe and appropriate use of blood components
René R.P. de Vries
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Question
Blood transfusion: worth the risk?
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Inappropiate Use
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
How can we improve appropriate use of blood components?
• Autorisation by experts• Monitoring of requests
and feed-back• Projects• Audits
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
How can we improve appropriate use of blood components?
• Autorisation by experts• Monitoring of requests
and feed-back• Projects• Audits
•Quality Indicators
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
( Quality )Indicator
• Definition: measurable element of health care that gives an indication about the quality of care
• Function: signaling, monitoring and adjustment
• Goal: improvement of quality of care
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Types of indicators 1
Structure indicator: How have I organised it?
Process indicator: Am I doing it well?
Outcome indicator: Do I reach the desired
result?
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Types of indicators 2
Internal indicators:Goal: quality management and
improvement
External indicators:Goal: external account
pm. Benchmarking
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators: 3 levels
1. Hospital
2. Haemovigilance system: national
3. IHN: international
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators: 3 levels
1. Hospital
2. Haemovigilance system: national
3. IHN: international
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators LUMC
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Blood transfusion chain
1. Clinical decision, patient sample and request
2. Processing request by Hospital Bloodbank and delivery of blood component
3. Administration of blood component to the patient
4. Assessment of the effect
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators LUMC
1. Clinical decision, patient sample and request
2. Processing request in Hospital Bloodbank and delivery of blood component
3. Administration of blood component to the patient
4. Assessment of the effect
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Utilisation of plasma: Dept. of Thorax surgery
Plasma verbruik afd. thoraxheelkunde
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
aangevraagd
getransfundeerd
% vernietigd
Plasma verbruik afd. thoraxheelkunde
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
aangevraagd
getransfundeerd
% vernietigd
RequestedTransfused% destroyed
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators LUMC
1. Clinical decision, patient sample and request
2. Processing request in Hospital Bloodbank and delivery of blood component
3. Administration of blood component to the patient
4. Assessment of the effect
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators LUMC
Target 2009
% of administered platelet units where the increment could be measured
> 75 % 76 %
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Blood use 1995-2006
Absolute numbers of transfused products per year
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators: 3 levels
1. Hospital
2. Haemovigilance system: national
3. IHN: international
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Indicators for benchmarking safe and appropriate use
• Developed according to the AIRE method
• Internal indicators but also selected on the basis of– Validity– Reliability– Ease of registration– Discriminative capacity ( benchmarking)– Possibility for improvement
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Structure indicators
• Transfusion Committee• Haemovigilance officer• Electronic registration of
process indicators• Electronic pre-administration
control
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Process indicators
• AB0-RhD blood group discrepancies• Waste of blood components • Indication and assessment of the effect
of transfusion of –erythrocytes–platelets–plasma
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Role for TRIP ?
• Collect • Analyse • Report (anonymously)
Indicators per hospital
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators: 3 levels
1. Hospital
2. Haemovigilance system: national
3. IHN: international
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
International indicators
Benchmarking
International standards?
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Indicators for the quality of Haemovigilance Systems?
• % hospitals that report• Quality of reports? Not easy!• Improvement of
safe use
appropriate use
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Conclusion 1
Quality indicators are an effective instrument to improve the quality of the
blood transfusion chain
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Conclusion 2
Success factors:• Electronic registration• Financial stimulus• Transfusion committee• Haemovigilance officer
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Conclusion 3
Future:• Computerisation of the whole
blood transfusion chain in the hospital
• Electronic request +computerized clinical decision support
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
THE END
Thank you
for your vigilance
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Indicators for safe and appropriate use of blood components
Haemovigilance is part of a quality system of the blood transfusion chain
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Should we watch for more than safety of blood transfusions?
RiskBlood transfusion 1:10.000 *Blood donation 1:100
Blood saving procedures ?
* medication 1: 100 ?
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Internal indicators
• Relevant for professional• Specific, detailed• Less stringent requirements for
validation• Registration at the source• Quick, funny, interactive• Paradigm: good-better
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
External indicators
• Relevant for external organisations• Aspecific, global• Strict validation necessary• Information is public• Paradigm: (often) good-bad
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Bloodtransfusion chain LUMC
1
2
3 4
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Utilisation of blood components (2008)
Purchased Number and % not used
Erythrocytes 13.893 358 2,6%
Plasma 5.045 732 14,5%
Platelets 5.158 55 1,1%
Other 259 7 2,7%
Total 24.364 1.152 4,7%
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Safe usage
Patients Products Severe reactions
Severe reactions due to mistakes
2006 2.701 23.996 0 0
2007 2.627 23.164 10* 0
2008 2.545 23.212 6 0
2009 2.531 20.865 9 0
* Since 2007 also grade 2 reactions are reported as severe reactions according to EU regulations
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Blood transfusion chain LUMC
1. Clinical decision, patient sample and request
2. Processing request by Hospital Bloodbank and delivery of blood component
3. Administration of blood component to the patient
4. Assessment of the effect
IHS XII Dubrovnik feb ‘10
Indicators for indication and request: safety
Target 2009
Number of blood group discrepancies in AB0-RhD screening of patients due to identification or labeling errors outside the transfusion laboratory divided by the total number of AB0-RhD screenings in the same period
< 1 ‰ 0.9 ‰