illinois department of children and family services, pathways to strengthening and supporting...

25
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development 1 PATHWAYS TO STRENGTHENING AND SUPPORTING FAMILIES IN ILLINOIS Module 3B - Critical Thinking

Upload: wyatt-powers

Post on 27-Mar-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

1

PATHWAYS TO STRENGTHENING AND SUPPORTING FAMILIES IN ILLINOIS

Module 3B - Critical Thinking

Page 2: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

2

Critical Thinking

The process of evaluating propositions or hypothesis and making judgments about them on the basis of well supported information.

Page 3: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

3

6 Steps of Critical Thinking

1. What information is available? 2. What am I being asked to believe or accept?3. What evidence is available to support the

assertion, is it reliable and valid?4. Are there alternative ways of interpreting the

evidence?5. What additional evidence would help to

evaluate the alternatives?6. What conclusions are most reasonable based

on the evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

Page 4: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

4

STEP 1: What Information is available?

Practice Case –Practice Case – The Parker CaseThe Parker Case

Available information?

Page 5: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

5

STEP 2: What am I being asked to believe or accept?

What do we know? What do we know?

What don’t we know?What don’t we know?

Page 6: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

6

STEP 3: What evidence is available to support the assertion, is it reliable and valid?

How do we turn information How do we turn information into evidence for decision into evidence for decision

making?making?

Page 7: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

7

STEP 4: Are there alternative ways of interpreting the evidence?

Does the family promise to do Does the family promise to do something (sometimes we something (sometimes we interpret that as evidence)?interpret that as evidence)?

Do they do it?Do they do it?

Page 8: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

8

STEP 5: What additional evidence would help to evaluate the alternatives?

Corroboratory information Corroboratory information available?available?

Page 9: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

9

STEP 6: What conclusions are most reasonable based on the evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

What conclusions about the What conclusions about the children can be made at this children can be made at this

time?time?

Page 10: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

10

6 Steps of Critical Thinking – Parker CaseCase

1. What information is available? 2. What am I being asked to believe or accept?3. What evidence is available to support the

assertion, is it reliable and valid?4. Are there alternative ways of interpreting the

evidence?5. What additional evidence would help to

evaluate the alternatives?6. What conclusions are most reasonable based

on the evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

Page 11: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

11

STEP 1: What Information is available?

Cadwell – Cadwell –

Initial Safety AssessmentInitial Safety Assessment

Available Information?

Page 12: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

12

STEP 2: What am I being asked to believe or accept?

What do we know? What do we know?

What don’t we know?What don’t we know?

Page 13: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

13

STEP 3: What evidence is available to support the assertion, is it reliable and valid?

How do we turn information How do we turn information into evidence?into evidence?

Page 14: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

14

STEP 4: Are there alternative ways of interpreting the evidence?

Family Strengths?Family Strengths?

Family Needs?Family Needs?

Page 15: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

15

STEP 5: What additional evidence would help to evaluate the alternatives?

Corroboratory information Corroboratory information available?available?

Page 16: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

16

STEP 6: What conclusions are most reasonable based on the evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

What conclusions about the What conclusions about the child’s well-being can be made child’s well-being can be made

at this time?at this time?

Page 17: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

17

6 Steps of Critical Thinking – DR Services?DR Services?

1. What information is available? 2. What am I being asked to believe or accept?3. What evidence is available to support the

assertion, is it reliable and valid?4. Are there alternative ways of interpreting the

evidence?5. What additional evidence would help to

evaluate the alternatives?6. What conclusions are most reasonable based

on the evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

Page 18: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

18

Small Group Activity

Use the “6 Steps of Critical Thinking” to reach a decision at each of the following stages of a DR Services Case:

1. 3-months after case opening

2. 6 Month Review

3. Permanency Goal No Longer Appropriate

Page 19: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

19

Small Group Presentation Stage One –Stage One –

3-Months After Case Opening3-Months After Case Opening

1. What information is available? 2. What am I being asked to believe or accept?3. What evidence is available to support the assertion, is

it reliable and valid?4. Are there alternative ways of interpreting the

evidence?5. What additional evidence would help to evaluate the

alternatives?6. What conclusions are most reasonable based on the

evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

Page 20: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

20

Stage One (3 Months) Red Flags

1. Possible consideration of inpatient substance abuse?

2. Any support available (other than Ashari)?3. Possible collaterals (other than Ashari)?4. LEADS/CANTS checks?5. Full medical workup for mom needed,

especially after learning she was pregnant?6. Possible second hotline report because mother

is pregnant and admitting to drug use?7. Should mother have custody with an indicated

sexual assault charge?

Page 21: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

21

Small Group Presentation Stage Two -Stage Two -

6-Month Review 6-Month Review 1. What information is available? 2. What am I being asked to believe or accept?3. What evidence is available to support the assertion, is

it reliable and valid?4. Are there alternative ways of interpreting the

evidence?5. What additional evidence would help to evaluate the

alternatives?6. What conclusions are most reasonable based on the

evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

Page 22: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

22

Stage Two (6 Months)Red Flags

1. Legal plan of action / possible empowerment of mom?

2. Drug screen was needed.

3. Was mother interviewed about the rash?

4. How long has the child’s breathing been an issue?

5. Supervisory consultation needed.

6. Child and Family Team needed.

7. Mother continues to need inpatient treatment.

Page 23: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

23

Small Group Presentation Permanency Goal No Longer

Appropriate1. What information is available? 2. What am I being asked to believe or accept?3. What evidence is available to support the assertion, is

it reliable and valid?4. Are there alternative ways of interpreting the

evidence?5. What additional evidence would help to evaluate the

alternatives?6. What conclusions are most reasonable based on the

evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

Page 24: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

24

Stage Three (Case Disruption) Red Flags

1. Other aliases for Ashari Nolan?

2. Moving back in with Ashari.

3. Why such a long wait for confirmation of the child’s visit to the doctor?

4. Ashari should have been added to the CERAP.

5. Mother continued to use drugs daily.

Page 25: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program

April 5, 2010Division of Service Support, Office of Training and Professional Development

25

Critical Thinking - Summary

Six Step Process for Critical Thinking1. What information is available? 2. What am I being asked to believe or accept?3. What evidence is available to support the assertion,

is it reliable and valid?4. Are there alternative ways of interpreting the

evidence?5. What additional evidence would help to evaluate the

alternatives?6. What conclusions are most reasonable based on

the evidence and the number of alternative explanations?

Questions / Concerns