ilogic_2

Upload: gladys-hernandez

Post on 04-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 iLogic_2

    1/8

    H OME TA BL E OF CO NT ENT S

    PDF

    2 Categorical Logic

    In Categorical Logic, we learn how to use the Venn Diagram to determine the validity of a special

    type of deductive arguments called categorical syllogisms. For example, to decide whether the

    following argument is valid

    Some fair people are apathetic and some apathetic people are not kind. So some fair

    people are not kind.

    we translate the argument into its categorical standard form

    Some A are not K.

    Some Fare A.

    Some Fare not K.

    The letters A, K, and F stand for the three terms in the arguments

    A: apathetic people

    K: kind people

    F: fair people

    Then, using a formal procedure called the Venn Diagram method, we can find out that the form is

    invalid. The argument is therefore not a good argument.

    2.1 Categorical Statements

    A categorical statement expresses how two sets of things relate to each other. For example, the

    statement All ravens are black birds tells us that every member of the set ravens is also a member

    of the set black birds.

    A categorical statement is made up of four components:

    I L O G I C

    Categorical Logic

    1 of 8

  • 7/31/2019 iLogic_2

    2/8

    The subject term and the predicate term stand for the two sets whose logical relation is

    characterized by the statement.

    2.1.1 Sets

    Aset is a group or class of things that share certain properties in common. For example, the set of

    ravens is a group of large birds that have black feathers and a croaking cry. Each of such a bird is

    said to be a member of the set.

    A general term such as ravens or dinosaurs refers to, or denotes, a set. The set of all dinosaurs

    that ever existed is called the referent of the term dinosaurs.

    A set with no member is called an empty set, symbolized as . For example, since there is no pink

    elephant, the term pink elephants denotes an empty set. Other terms that refer to empty sets

    include centaurs and elves because they are depicted in mythologies and do not exist in the real

    world.

    The universe of discourse is the set of all things being discussed. If we are talking about

    animals, the universe of discourse would be the set of animals. If we are discussing people, the

    universe of discourse would be the set of people.

    Visually, the blue circle represents the setS and a rectangle stands for the universe of discourse.

    Categorical Logic

    2 of 8

  • 7/31/2019 iLogic_2

    3/8

    The complement of the set S is the set non-S (or SC). It contains everything in the universe of

    discourse except the members of the set S. Represented visually, non-S is the blue area outside the

    circle.

    The union of a set and its complement is the universe of discourse. That is, SSC

    =U.

    The visual way of representing a set with a circle may give rise to the impression that a set has a

    clear border and we can always clearly and precisely determine whether something belongs to the

    set. However, it should be noted that while some sets are crisp, many are fuzzy sets. A fuzzy set

    has a grey area for whether something is its member. For example, there are borderline cases of

    whether a man is bald. So the set of bald men is a fuzzy set. It is more accurate to represent a fuzzy

    set as a circle with a blur boundary.

    2.1.2 Quantifiers and Copula

    The first word in a categorical statement is the quantifier. The quantifier determines the quantity

    of a categorical statement. There are two quantifiers in Categorical Logic: All and Some. The

    word All is the universal quantifier. It is used to say something about every member of the set

    Categorical Logic

    3 of 8

  • 7/31/2019 iLogic_2

    4/8

    denoted by the subject term. Some is the existential quantifier. It is sometimes called the

    particular quantifier. It is used to say something about at least one member of the set denoted by

    the subject term.

    A copula is a verb that links the subject and predicate terms together. In the standard categorical

    statement form, the only copula that can be used is the verb are. If a categorical statement is

    written with other verbs, it has to be rephrased using the standard copula are. For example,

    Some birds cannot fly.

    is not a standard categorical statement. It has to be rewritten as

    Some birds are not flyers.

    In doing so, we then have two terms birds and flyers that designate two sets. The copula is used

    to affirm or deny membership, that is, to indicate whether members of the first set are also

    members of the second set. If it affirms membership, then we say the categorical statement is

    affirmative; if it denies membership, then the statement is negative. Being affirmative or negative is

    called the qualityof a categorical statement.

    2.1.3 The A E I O Statements

    Given two sets, it is possible that every member of the first set is also a member of the second set. It

    is also possible that none of the member of the first set is a member of the second set. The third

    possibility is that there is at least one member of the first set that is also a member of the second

    set. The fourth is that at least one member of the first set is not a member of the second set. As a

    result, there are four types of categorical statements.

    TheAStatement

    The A statement is the universal affirmative statement. It asserts that every member of the set S is

    also a member of the set P. It has the statement form that

    All S are P.

    Here S is the variable used for the subject term and Pis the variable for the predicate term. The

    statement

    All dolphins are mammals.

    asserts that every member of the set dolphins is also a member of the set mammals.

    TheEStatement

    The E statement is the universal negative statement. It says that none of the member of the set S is

    also a member of the set P. It has the statement form that

    No S are P.

    The statement

    No bats are birds.

    Categorical Logic

    4 of 8

  • 7/31/2019 iLogic_2

    5/8

    denies any bat the membership of the set birds. In other words, the two sets do not share any

    member in common.

    You may wonder why we do not use

    All S are not P.

    as the statement form for the E statement. The reason is that the statement form is ambiguous.

    Given the context and our background knowledge about the world, we would sometimes read All S

    are not P as meaning No S are P, but on other occasions, we would take it to mean Some S are

    not P. For example, given what we know about emeralds, we would take All emeralds are not

    blue to mean that no emeralds are blue. However, given what we know about apples, we would not

    misinterpret All apples are not green as meaning that no apples are green. Rather, we would take

    it as an emphatic way of saying that some apples are not green. To avoid confusion, logicians

    choose to use the form No S are P for the E statement.

    TheIStatement

    The I statement is the particular affirmative statement. It asserts that at least one member of the

    set S is also a member of the set P. It has the statement form that

    Some S are P.

    The statement

    Some dinosaurs are carnivores.

    asserts that at least there is one dinosaur that is also a carnivore.

    TheOStatement

    The O statement is the particular negative statement. It denies at least one member of the set S the

    membership of the set P. That is, it claims that at least one member of the set S is not a member of

    the set P. It has the statement form that

    Some S are not P.

    The statement

    Some reptiles are not animals with legs.

    asserts that there is at least one reptile that is not an animal with leg.

    2.1.4 Venn Diagrams for Statements

    A categorical statement has a subject term and a predicate term. We use two overlapping circles to

    represent the two sets denoted by the two terms.

    Categorical Logic

    5 of 8

  • 7/31/2019 iLogic_2

    6/8

    The two overlapping circles form three areas: area , and . Everything in the area is a member

    ofS, but not a member ofP. Everything in the area is a member ofS, and a member ofP.

    Everything in the area is a member ofP, but not a member ofS.

    The Venn Diagram for theAStatement

    In the Venn Diagram for the A statement All dolphins are mammals, the area is shaded. This

    means that the area is empty. Therefore, all members of the set D (the set of dolphins) must be inthe area. But if they are in the area, then they must also be members of the set M(the set of

    mammals).

    The Venn Diagram for theEStatement

    In the Venn Diagram for the E statement No bats are birds, the area is shaded. This means that

    the area is empty. Therefore, all members of the set B (the set of bats) must be in the area . But if

    they are in the area , then they cannot be members of the set D (the set of birds).

    The Venn Diagram for theIStatement

    In the Venn Diagram for the I statement Some dinosaurs are carnivores, there is an X in the

    area. This means that the area is not empty, i.e., there is at least one member of the set D (the set

    Categorical Logic

    6 of 8

  • 7/31/2019 iLogic_2

    7/8

    of dinosaurs) in the area. But if it is in the area , then it must also be a member of the set C(the

    set of carnivores).

    The Venn Diagram for theOStatement

    In the Venn Diagram for the O statement Some reptiles are not animals with legs, there is an X

    in the area . This means that the area is not empty, i.e., there is at least one member of the setR

    (the set of reptiles) in the area . But if it is in the area , then it cannot be a member of the set A

    (the set of animals with legs).

    Exercise 2.1

    Decide which of the following terms refer to empty sets.I.

    dragons mammoths electrons

    pirates ghosts soulspsychics magicians witches

    geometric shapes music black holes

    demons space aliens imaginary numbers

    Decide which of the following terms refer to fuzzy sets.II.

    Categorical Logic

    7 of 8

  • 7/31/2019 iLogic_2

    8/8

    tables dogs books

    white flowers trees skyscrapers

    friends gadgets toddlers

    cars smart people prime numbers

    managers heroes planets

    valid arguments middle class games

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works

    3.0 United States License.

    PREVIOUS NEXT

    Categorical Logic