imaging systems in nature - mitweb.mit.edu/2.710/fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfimaging systems in nature...

19
MIT 2.71/2.710 09/26/05 wk4-a-1 Imaging systems in nature “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities Human eye: evolved for adaptivity (e.g. brightness adjustment) transmission efficiency (e.g. mexican hat response) bypass structural defects (e.g. blind spot) other functional requirements (e.g. stereo vision) Insect eye: similar, but much simpler processor (human brain = ~10 11 neurons; insect brain = ~10 4 neurons)

Upload: others

Post on 30-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-1

Imaging systems in nature

• “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

• Human eye: evolved for– adaptivity (e.g. brightness adjustment)– transmission efficiency (e.g. mexican hat response)– bypass structural defects (e.g. blind spot)– other functional requirements (e.g. stereo vision)

• Insect eye: similar, but much simpler processor (human brain = ~1011 neurons; insect brain = ~104 neurons)

Page 2: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-2

Anatomy of the human eye

W. J. Smith, “Modern Optical Engineering,” McGraw-Hill

Page 3: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-3

Eye schematic with typical dimensions

Photographic camera

FFP1.5cm BFP

Page 4: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-4

Remote object (unaccommodated eye)

Proximal object (accommodated eye)

Comfortable viewing up to 2.5cm away from the cornea

Accommodation (focusing)

Page 5: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-5

Eye defects and their correction

from Fundamentals of Opticsby F. Jenkins & H. White

Page 6: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-6

The eye’s “digital camera”: retina

http://www.mdsupport.org

Page 7: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-7

The eye’s “digital camera”: retina

http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~avery/

rods: intensity (grayscale) cones: color (R/G/B)

Page 8: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-8

Retina vs your digital camera

(grossly exaggerated; in actual retinatransition from dense to sparse sampling

is much smoother)

Retina:variant sampling rate

Digital camera:fixed sampling rate

Page 9: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-9

Retina vs your digital cameraRetina:

blind spot not noticeableDigital camera:

bad pixels destructive

Page 10: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-10

Retina vs your digital camera

CCD imageRetinal image

http://www.klab.caltech.edu/~itti/

Page 11: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-11

Spatial response of the retina –lateral connections

http://webvision.med.utah.edu/

Page 12: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-12

Spatial response of the retina –lateral connections

http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~avery/

Page 13: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-13

Spatial response of the retina –lateral connections

http://faculty.washington.edu/wcalvin

Explanation of the “flipping dot” illusion: the Mexican hat response

Page 14: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-14

Temporal response: after-images

http://dragon.uml.edu/psych/

Page 15: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-15

Seeing 3D

http://www.ccom.unh.edu/vislab/VisCourse

Page 16: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-16

http://research.microsoft.com/users/antcrim/talks/UWTalk_files/slide0074.htm

Page 17: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-17

Page 18: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-18

The compound eye

Page 19: Imaging systems in nature - MITweb.mit.edu/2.710/Fall06/2.710-wk4-a-sl.pdfImaging systems in nature • “Physical” architecture matches survival requirements and processing capabilities

MIT 2.71/2.71009/26/05 wk4-a-19

Elements of the compound eye:ommatidia (=little eyes)

“image” formation:blurry, but

computationally efficientfor moving-edge detection