impact of ipr in hatch-waxman and biologics strategies · microsoft powerpoint - impact of ipr in...

15
The content of this presentation is for educational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Fish & Richardson or the companies represented by the speakers at this event, and is also not intended to address every court or case situation. Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies Presented By: Leslie Robbins, Dorothy Whelan, and Chad Shear

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2020

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

The content of this presentation is for educational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Fish & Richardson or the companies represented by the speakers at this event, and is also not intended to address every court or case situation.

Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics StrategiesPresented By: Leslie Robbins, Dorothy Whelan, and Chad Shear

Page 2: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

What is Post-Grant?

• USPTO mechanisms for testing patentability• Designed as cost-effective and speedy alternatives to

litigation• Three primary flavors:

1 – IPR (Inter Partes Review)2 – PGR (Post Grant Review)3 – CBM (Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents)

2

Page 3: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Proceeding When Does It Apply? Legal standard Grounds (Prior Art)

Estoppel?

PGR: Post-grant review(9 month window)

-First available on Sept. 16, 2012-Applies only to patents having a claim with a priority date on or after March 16, 2013

More likely than not that at least 1 claim is unpatentable

Any invalidity ground Raised or reasonably could have raised

IPR: Inter partesreview(after PGR)

-First available on Sept. 16, 2012-Applies to all patents-Must file within 1 year of being served with infringement complaint

Reasonable likelihood that petitioner would prevail on at least 1 claim

PatentsPublished patent appsPrinted publications

Raised or reasonably could have raised

CBM: Covered Business Method

-First available on Sept. 16, 2012-Applies to all patents related to “financial services” but excludes “technological inventions”

-More likely than not that at least 1 claim is unpatentable-Petitioner sued or “charged with infringement”

Any invalidity ground Narrow: Raised(USPTO and Civil) or reasonably could have raised (USPTO)

3

Page 4: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Features

• Claim construction: Broadest reasonable interpretation• Burden of proof: Preponderance of the evidence• Limited discovery• Limited ability to amend claims• Fast relative to reexamination and district court litigation• Estoppel• Can be settled

4

Page 5: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Background - Timeline

Early post-grant webinars speak to the timeline in detail:http://fishpostgrant.com/webinars-2012/http://fishpostgrant.com/webinars-2013/

5

Page 6: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Post-Grant

Are defendants and license targets using Post-Grant?

YES!!

6

Page 7: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Post-Grant: Number of Filings (2/24/15)

7

Page 8: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Post-Grant: Overall Technology Breakdown

8

Page 9: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Post-Grant: Petition Dispositions (2/24/15)

9

Page 10: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Who is Filing?

Generics

• Accord Healthcare

• Amneal• Apotex• Aurobindo• Breckenridge• Impax• Mylan

• Par• Perrigo• Ranbaxy• Roxanne• Sandoz• Sun• Torrent

Non- Generics

• BioDeliverySciences

• Eli Lilly• Endo• Galderma• MonoSol Rx

• Phigenix• Purdue• Shire• St Jude

10

Page 11: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Who has been Targeted?

AllerganAlza

Alcon PharmaBrigham and Women's

HospitalBTG International

Choongwae Pharma. Corp.Cubist

DepomedEli LillyEndo

GenentechGilead

Grifols SAHelsinn Healthcare SA

ImmunogenJazz Pharma

LifeScanKyoto University

MayoMerck

MonoSol RX, LLCMyriad Genetics

NovartisReckitt BenckiserRoche Palo Alto

Senju Pharma. Co., Ltd

SupernusUCLA Med. Ctr.

Univ. of MichiganUniv. of Utah

VertexViiv HealthcareWyeth (Pfizer)

11

Page 12: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

IPR vs District Court

IPR Timing

IPR Written Decision - 18 months CAFC Decision - 18 months

DCT Timing

TrialFact Discovery Expert Discovery

18 months 4 months

30 months to End of Stay/Typical Written Decision

12

Page 13: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Resources – General Info

• fishpostgrant.com• Details on each proceeding, timelines, links to searchable versions of relevant rules• 24+ hours of webinars on post-grant topics (audio and video)• News alerts, case summaries, case studies/testimonials• Listing of stays relating to IPR

• Fish Post-Grant App• Available for iPhone and Android through their respective app

stores• Details at fishpostgrant.com/app

• USPTO Sites:• AIA Main: http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/index.jsp• Inter Partes: http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/bpai.jsp

13

Page 14: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Thank You!

Dorothy WhelanFish & [email protected]

Chad ShearFish & [email protected]

14

Leslie RobbinsCoherus BioSciencesVice President, Intellectual [email protected]

Page 15: Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies · Microsoft PowerPoint - Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies.pptx Author: EUM Created Date: 2/26/2015 4:10:29

Contact Fish & Richardson

Download the presentation and access other valuable materials at www.fishlifesciences.com

Contact us with your questions and comments.

Robin Chance Senior Marketing Manager Fish & [email protected]; +1-612-766-2023

© Copyright 2015 Fish & Richardson P.C. These materials may be considered advertising for legal services under the laws and rules of professional conduct. The materials contained in this presentation has been gathered by the lawyers at Fish & Richardson P.C. for informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. Transmission is not intended to create and receipt does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Legal advice of any nature should be sought from legal counsel. For more information about Fish & Richardson P.C. and our practices, please visit www.fr.com