impact of social networking sites on students academic performance reasearch project
DESCRIPTION
impact of social networking sites on students academic performance reasearch projectTRANSCRIPT
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Online Social Networking Sites and Student Achievement
Elizabeth Power
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for Education 6590
For the degree of Master of Education
Faculty of Education
Memorial University of Newfoundland
St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador
July 22, 2012
1
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Abstract
This paper reviews the available literature on the relationship and impact online social networking sites have on student engagement and achievement. Online social networking sites are plentiful, varied and easily accessible to students and teachers alike. The potential for using these SNSs to further the goal of education is immense, and teachers are making the foray into the world of online social networking for educational purposes. However, educators cannot presuppose that because SNSs are a timely technology, they will necessarily engage students and improve student achievement. In fact, the research is inconclusive. This paper will review literature which has reported finding positive impacts of SNSs on student engagement and achievement, and other literature which finds a negative correlation, or at best, no conclusive proof that there is any kind of a link between the two. Aspects of online social networking such as engagement, collaboration, creativity, distraction, grade point average and academic achievement are considered in the literature. Results of this review will indicate that, while there are many instances of research reporting positive and negative results, there is no conclusive evidence either for or against the impact of SNSs on engagement and achievement. Generally, participation in online SNSs has a positive connection to student engagement, but a negative connection to student achievement. The review concludes with suggestions and implications for further research.
Key words: social networking sites, student achievement, student engagement
2
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
ContentsAbstract.................................................................................................................................................2
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................4
Research Question and Rationale......................................................................................................4
Background.......................................................................................................................................6
Definitions......................................................................................................................................10
Review of related research and literature............................................................................................11
Positive impact of SNSs on student engagement and achievement.................................................11
Negative impact of SNSs on student engagement and achievement................................................14
Neutral research on the impact of SNSs on student engagement and achievement.........................18
Summary of Findings..........................................................................................................................19
Summary.........................................................................................................................................19
Discussion and Implications for further research............................................................................22
References...........................................................................................................................................27
3
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Introduction
Research Question and Rationale
Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Friendster, Cloudworks, Twitter, and Ning are but a few
examples of the relatively new phenomenon of online social networking. People of all ages are
flocking to the Internet and are signing up for social networking sites by the millions. Facebook,
for example, boasted 901 million monthly active users and more than 125 billion friend
connections at the end of March (Key Facts, 2012). This popularity of online social networking
sites (SNSs) is constantly growing. Educators are set to take advantage of the multiple
collaboration tools and discussion opportunities provided by social networking sites for
secondary and higher education (Hoffman, 2009; Mason & Rennie, 2008, as cited in Forkosh-
Baruch, & Hershkovitz, 2012). Despite the fact that there is limited guidance on how educators
can integrate social networking sites into subjects which have been traditionally delivered face-
to-face (Andrews & Drennan, 2009), teachers are on the lookout for information on the potential
benefits or harmful effects using SNSs as a new and innovative way to try to engage students and
improve student achievement. This effort is supported by Munoz and Towner (2009) when they
suggest that
“the benefits of Facebook’s networking and social communication capabilities can benefit both the instructor and the student by tapping into a greater number of learning styles, providing an alternative to the traditional lecture format, creating an online classroom community, and increasing teacher-student and student-student interaction.” (p. 9).
4
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Accordingly, if teachers are indeed encouraged to bring social networking into the
classrooms, then the research question that begs to be asked, and which will be discussed in this
paper, is “Does online social networking have an impact on student engagement and
achievement?”
For the purposes of this paper, online social networking sites will be defined as web-
based services that permit individuals to create a public or semi public profile, display a list of
other users with whom they share a connection, and view and navigate through their list of
connections and those made by others within the system, (Boyd & Ellison, 2008, p. 211). Social
networking could, in general terms, be seen as a way of describing the modelling of everyday
practices of social interaction, including those that take place within family structures, between
friends, and in neighbourhoods and communities (Merchant, 2012). With online social
networking sites, these practices of social interaction are taken to the technological level which
allows for social interactions within families, between friends, in neighbourhoods and
communities, and now, even the world, through the development of online communities. Most
social networking sites incorporate a range of communication tools such as mobile connectivity,
blogs, and photo/video sharing; with many platforms cross-posting to each other if the user so
desires. For example, a student or teacher could post a comment on Twitter and it would appear
in their blog or on a private or educational SNS such as Ning, Elgg, or Facebook. Presently,
many students are using this cross-connectivity of SNSs for non-academic (or purely social)
purposes (Ahmed & Qazi, 2011a).
5
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Merchant (2012) has suggested that there are three possible approaches to the use of
social networking sites in educational settings: learning about SNSs (including understanding
and identifying the knowledge, skills, dispositions and learning involved); learning from SNSs
(to understand and appreciate the kinds of learning a social networking site can support); and
learning with SNSs (making use of the student’s existing SNSs to support and extend
curriculum-based work); suggesting that these three areas describe how students and teachers
currently use SNSs, and that they are relevant to teachers trying to incorporate SN work into
their classroom (p. 16). As further support for teachers contemplating using SNS in the
classroom, it has been proposed that social networking-type interactions such as quality
relationships, connectedness, modelling positive behaviours and sharing information have been
observed taking place through social networking sites (Martin & Dowson, 2009).
Considering the amount of research which surrounds the use of SNSs in the education
system, it is imperative to determine whether or not social networking sites have any impact on
student engagement and achievement. This paper will review the available literature on the
subject and represent it as positive, negative, or neutral results of various studies.
Background
Even though online social networking sites are a relatively new phenomenon, popularity
is growing rapidly among college-aged youth, with 95% of 18 and 19 year olds using Facebook
(Smith & Caruso, 2010). The emerging literature suggests that SNSs are becoming ubiquitous
components of youth and young adult life, and the nature of SNSs was reported by Hargittai
6
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
(2008), who found few demographic differences between users and nonusers of social
networking sites in a sample of college students. In a study set out to determine the most
effective way for faculty to use social networking sites for educational purposes, Nemetz, Aiken,
Cooney, and Pascal (2010) stated conclusively that students use social networking sites
frequently and extensively. Facebook was initially designed by Mark Zuckerberg, Dustin
Moskovitz and Chris Hughes in 2004 as a means by which fellow Harvard students could
communicate, share study-related information and socialize with peers at the University level
(Calvi, Cassella, & Nuijten, 2010; Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe, 2007). The popularity of
Facebook and other social networking sites is growing to include applications in formal
educational settings, such as learning management systems and augmentation of content, and in
informal educational settings, such as relationship management systems, in sharing,
communication, information discovery, and creative forms of behavior (Forkosh-Baruch, &
Hershkovitz, 2012; McLoughlin & Lee, 2008).
Despite these statements by Forkosh-Baruch and Hershkovitz, this growth in popularity
of social networking sites appears to be underdeveloped in the field of education, with only about
30% of college respondents reporting using SNSs in their courses, despite the fact that about half
of these same students use SNSs to collaborate with classmates about course-related topics
(Smith & Caruso, 2010). The education system has an opportunity to reach the students in a
mode of communication they enjoy and use, but educators are not doing so; a fact reiterated by
Akyildiz and Argan (2010) when they concluded that students rarely used Facebook for
educational purposes. In a similar manner, Nemetz et al. (2010) found that students view SNSs 7
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
differently when considering its use for social purposes, as opposed to considering SNSs for
educational purposes.
Even so, the research contains many instances of the educational potential of social
networking sites. For example, instructors, learners, system designers and decision makers
(Forkosh-Baruch & Hershkovitz, 2012) as well as students by their own initiative (Selwyn,
2009), are coming to use social networking sites for educationally related activities, including
significant and new innovations in areas of interactive and collaborative learning (Schroeder,
Minocha, & Schneider, 2010). These new social networking practices are being used in areas
such as “knowledge sharing, development of ideas, and creative production while allowing for
personal sense making and reflection” (McLoughlin & Lee, 2008, p. 12).
Much of the research suggests that students, faculty, and administrations need to explore
the use of online social networking sites in education. In fact, the National School Board
Association (United States) recognizes the potential value of using SNSs in the classroom,
recommending that school board members find ways to harness the educational value of social
networking, chat rooms and collaborative online journals (Gewertz, 2007). In a study of the use
of alternative social networking sites in education, Brady et al. (2010) put forward that, to date,
the higher educational community has been noticeably slow in adopting social networking
technologies into the curriculum. Ajjan and Hartshorne (2008), support the call for students,
faculty, and administrations to explore the use of SNSs in education in their research into faculty
decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies in their classrooms. The authors suggest that social
networking sites could be used to establish a series of academic connections, or to foster 8
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
collaboration and cooperation in the higher education classroom. There are some instances
where this potential for the use of social media has been recognized. Griffith and Liyange
(2008) suggest that the positive aspect of SNSs and their use is starting to be seen, as students are
using SNSs in their academic studies for group and team-based work. Social networking sites
are also seen to be in use in various academic activities, including communicating with faculty
and lecturers, and discussing academic issues with classmates (Helou & Ab. Rahim, 2000).
While it is apparent that the educational potential of SNSs exists, this potential is not
always exploited, and opinions vary as to whether or not it should be exploited. These
challenges relating to the potential value of social networking sites as an educational tool are
summed up by Hoffman (2009) in a presentation to the Technology Colleges and Community
when she states “Social networking is a tool, with both its advantages and problems for usage in
teaching and learning” (p. 98). This sentiment is echoed by Hamid, Waycott, Kurnia, and Chang
(2010) who studied the use of online social networking for higher education and conclude that,
despite the potential benefits they have identified, harnessing social technologies offers both
opportunities and challenges. This paper explores many of these opportunities and challenges.
Despite being a timely question, research on social networking sites and student
engagement and achievement is limited when compared to studies of SNSs relating to other
issues such as student privacy, safety, social capital, and psychological well-being (Ahn, 2011).
What then, does the research say about online social networking sites impacting student
engagement and achievement?
9
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Definitions
While analyzing the research available it was noted that studies generally
focused on students at the University level, with the occasional study focusing on the
secondary school student. As a result, this paper focuses mainly on this level of higher
education. In the context of this review, social networking sites (SNSs) refers to general
social networking sites such as Facebook or MySpace which students are free to join
and which enable “friending” other students, placing of photos and information,
allowing continuous status updates, the potential for collaboration and chatting, and
encourage the joining of “groups” reflecting personal interest. In this paper, the
definition for student achievement is derived from the Report of the Student
Achievement Task Force based in British Columbia, which states that “Student
achievement is an improvement in learning that develops both the individual and the
individual’s ability to contribute to society” (Brownlie & Renihan, 2003, p. 9),
combined with the suggestion put forth by Ahmed and Qazi (2011b) that the use of
technology such as the Internet (and by extension, social networking sites) is one of the
most important factors that can influence educational performance of students positively
or adversely. Likewise, for the purposes of this paper student engagement is defined as
the time and effort students invest in educational activities (Kuh, 2009). Since one of
the primary goals of the education system is to enhance student engagement and
advance student achievement, it seems logical to analyze what the research has to say
about the impact of social networking sites on the engagement and achievement of 10
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
students. Whether defined as student achievement, or student engagement leading to
student achievement, this paper will examine the research relating to the impact social
networking sites has on both.
Review of related research and literature
Positive impact of SNSs on student engagement and achievement
It is important to understand the connection between student achievement and student
engagement. Much of the research indicates that student academic achievement may be
increased by enhancing student engagement, and accordingly, student engagement has been
identified as a significant predictor of academic performance (Zhao & Kuh, 2004, p 1332; Wise,
Skues, &Williams, 2011). The connection between academic engagement and academic
performance is supported by Junco, Heiberger and Loken (2011), when they report that they
know that academic and co-curricular engagement are powerful forces in student psychosocial
development and in academic success.
Brady, Holcomb and Smith (2010), in a study of the educational benefits of the social
networking site Ning state that, since social networking sites are centered on the individual,
rather than on the class, they have the potential to increase student engagement. These same
authors also noted that the majority of participants in their study highlighted the educational
advantages of SNSs and the instructors observed positive effects of using Ning on student
engagement (2010). These types of interactions begin to identify how relationship development
in a social networking setting may contribute to increased engagement and learning.
11
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Facebook and Twitter, two very popular social networking sites are often mentioned in
relation to student engagement. In a study examining the relationships among frequency of
Facebook use and participation and student engagement, Junco (2011), a prolific researcher on
modern technology and its effects on education, suggests that using Facebook in certain ways is
positively predictive of student engagement (p. 169). Wise et al. (2011) promote the
information-sharing social network ‘Twitter’ as having positive potential for improving
academic engagement. Support for the connection between student engagement and student
achievement, in relation to the effects of social networking is provided by Hoffman (2009) when
she states that among the positive attributes of social networking are impacts on affective aspects
of the learning environment, as well as impacts on motivation and student engagement.
As was previously mentioned, teachers are looking to the Internet to find new and
innovative ways to engage and teach students.Improving student achievement is foremost on
their minds. Many authors report positive impacts on student achievement as a result of
participation in social networking sites.
After conducting a study of the influence of social networking sites on students’
academic performance in Malaysia, Helou and Ab.Rahim (2011) found that the majority of the
respondents agreed that social networking sites have a positive impact on their academic
performance; despite the fact that they also reported that they mainly engaged in social
networking sites for social reasons rather than academic reasons. The Brady et al. (2010) study
of the educationally-based social networking site Ning also provided evidence of a positive
12
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
impact on student achievement, noting that the majority of students reported positive e-learning
benefits in their courses including increased collaboration and exchange of information
compared to face-to-face courses. It is important to note that in both the Brady et al. (2010) and
Helou and Ab Rahim (2011) studies students were self-reporting their impressions on the impact
of their use of social networking sites.
In a study designed to investigate the effect of social networking site (Facebook,
YouTube and Twitter) engagement on cognitive and social skills, Alloway and Alloway (2012)
suggested that some activities predicted higher scores in verbal and visual-spatial working
memory performance. Results such as these would suggest a possible connection between this
SNS engagement and improvement of student achievement. In fact, Alloway and Alloway state
in their discussion that, given the importance of working memory in education, further research
should investigate this possible connection. Similarly, Yu, Tian, Vogel and Kwok (2010)
determined that online social networking can improve students’ psychological well-being and
skill development; desired learning outcomes.
While social networking sites are not often used in classrooms yet the potential for the
educational impact of social networking sites on academic achievement is recognized and well
reported. Beach and Doerr-Stevens (2011) confirm the possibility that social networking sites
can have a positive impact on student achievement, noting that the collaborative nature of social
networking sites could have a positive effect on the development of civic engagement in
students. Furthermore, in another study supporting the positive impact of social networking
13
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
sites, Forkosh-Baruch and Hershkovitz, (2012) concluded that Twitter could actually increase
student engagement and improve grades in educationally relevant ways and so was a useful tool
in education. In the conclusion of their study on the usefulness of the educationally-focused
social networking site called Ning, Brady et al. (2010) reported that, for a majority of students,
social networking sites provide significant e-learning benefits in their courses. Mahadi and
Ubaidullah (2010) indicate that social networking sites can enhance language, particularly
second language, learning since the social interaction, authenticity, feedback, and learner
autonomy found in a SNS are also the key characteristics of successful language learning, and
that teachers should consider SNSs as an engaging option. As the research suggests, student
engagement and achievement can be impacted positively by student use of social networking
sites, and, whether through self-reporting or independent research, a correlation between
improvements in student engagement and achievement has been identified.
Negative impact of SNSs on student engagement and achievement
While teachers may be looking towards social networking sites for inspiration, a look at
the research suggests the connection between SNSs and student engagement and achievement is
not always a positive one. Several studies have found a negative relationship between student use
of SNSs and engagement and achievement.
Even before the development of social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace,
research was reporting that Internet use in general could cause some students academic
difficulties (Kubey, Lavin & Barrows, 2001). In a much reported explorative study to determine
14
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
whether differences existed in the academic performance of college students who were Facebook
users, and those who were not Facebook users; considering Facebook as an activity that students
carry out while studying - in other words, multitasking; Kirschner and Karpinski (2010) reported
significant findings. The authors found a negative correlation between Facebook and student
achievement, relaying that Facebook users reported having a lower mean grade point average
(GPA). They also reported spending fewer hours per week studying, and engaged in
procrastinating behaviour. This study apparently reflects the fears educators have about the
dangers of social networking sites, and how they will be only a detriment to student engagement
and achievement. In a similar but larger-sampled linear regression analysis of the relationship
among frequency of Facebook use; participation in Facebook activities; time spent preparing for
class; and actual, as opposed to self-reported, overall GPA; Junco (2012), suggests several
negative predictors of overall GPA, including chatting, checking, and posting status updates on
Facebook. The author places further emphasis on this negative correlation in his discussion
when he states “Specifically, large increases in time spent on Facebook relate to lower overall
GPAs” (p. 194). Junco (2012) continues to relate how this increased time on Facebook would
certainly detract from time spent focusing on academic work, and would negatively impact
academic success. Flad (2010) agrees, reporting that SNS use can have a negative impact on
study habits and homework completion, with students in their study admitting to having spent
time on SNSs rather than studying, and that time spent on a SNS has prevented them from
completing homework.
15
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Similar findings were reported by Paul, Baker and Cochran (2012) in a very recent study
of the relationship between time spent on online social networking sites and academic
performance, stating that time spent on SNSs is shown to negatively impact academic
performance. In a second revealing finding coming from their study, Paul et al. (2012) also
reported that as the level of attention deficit increased, the amount of time spent on social
networking sites increased, “implying that increased levels of attention deficit have a negative,
although indirect [through increased time on SNSs] impact on academic performance” (p. 7). As
a result of these findings, Paul et al. (2012) even go so far as to suggest that students should be
made aware of the potential detrimental effect SNSs can have on their academic achievement.
Adding to the research maintaining a negative correlation between SNSs and academic
achievement is a study comparing the use of Facebook as a medium for social interaction or
informal learning. Madge, Meek, Wellens, and Hooley (2009) came to the conclusion that time
spent on Facebook for social purposes was sometimes to the detriment of time available for
academic study. Any time spent away from time allotted to academic study could be viewed as a
negative influence. Jacobsen and Forste (2011) concur in a study of the academic and social
outcomes of electronic media use among university students. In this study students indicated
that electronic media (which the authors describe as including Facebook and instant messaging)
is negatively associated with grades, and that since students report using this electronic media in
class or while doing homework, the distractions would be detrimental to student performance. In
fact, after controlling for offline time use, Jacobsen and Forste conclude “there is a significant
negative association between social networking site exposure and academic performance” (p. 16
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
278). Similarly, in a fittingly titled paper “No A 4 U ...,” which examines the perceived
academic effects of instant messaging, Junco and Cotton (2012), reported that students in their
sample seemed to be aware that divided attention, or multitasking, is detrimental to their
academic achievement. Yet students reported continuing with these same activities.
In a recent study to explore the relationship between SNSs and educational performance
of students, Ahmed, Amir, Qazi and Jabeen (2011) sampled 1000 students from various
universities in Pakistan, comparing aspects of SNS usage in areas such as student gender,
specialty area of study, age, study habits, leisure activities, time and purpose on the internet, time
spent on SNSs, and most importantly for this paper – the effect of using social networking sites
on their studying habits, and the differences of academic performance of students. The authors
found study habits were significantly affected by time spent using social networking sites
concluding that Internet and SNS usage “significantly [negatively] affect the studying habits of
the students and eventually their academic performance” (p. 156). This is supported by Oye,
Helou, and Ab.Rahim (2012) whose participants related that spending more time on SNSs
resulted in them getting lower grades, and some perceived the distractions of SNSs ranging from
“mere distraction” to “obsession” (p. 27). Even the research study which generally reported a
positive relationship between the social networking site Ning and education, found that some
students did identify time and accessibility as major limitations to using Ning to help them to
succeed academically, and 54% also expressed a preference for face-to-face communications
over Ning (Brady et al., 2010), suggesting a preference away from academic use of social
networking sites. Although concluding with positive remarks about Twitter, Wise et al. (2011) 17
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
argue that Facebook, a medium for social interaction, has only a limited role, if any, to play in
promoting student engagement from an academic or institutional perspective.
Despite the intentions of many researchers to find a conclusive impact of use of social
networking sites on engagement and achievement, many reported no such findings, concluding
only that there was no real connection to be found.
Neutral research on the impact of SNSs on student engagement and achievement
While many researchers weigh in on the positive or negative side of the impact of social
networking sites on student engagement and achievement, other literature is reported as being
neutral. This is supported in research focusing on social networking and gender when the author
states “The relationship between students who are actively involved in social networking and
their academic performance is inconclusive” (Flad, 2010, p. 38). Ahmed and Qazi (2011b) also
reported results from their study which explored the relationship between SNS usage and
educational performance of the student user, finding that internet or SNS usage was not
significant enough to affect the academic performance of students adversely.
In a presentation to Technology, Colleges and Community (TCC) which focused on
evaluating social networking tools for distance learning, Hoffman (2009) stated that there was
insufficient evidence to suggest that Ning directly impacted individual student achievement, even
though students commented that they felt social networking did have a positive impact on
student engagement and satisfaction. As well, no association was found between grade point
18
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
averages of student Facebook users and nonusers in a study which examined a random sample of
Facebook profiles at a Northeast University in the USA, (Kolek & Saunders, 2008). A
connection between use of social networking sites and improvements in self-esteem and
development of the whole person, which can ultimately lead to performance proficiency and
future success was noted by Yu et al. (2010), but despite this positive outlook, they caution the
“coin has two sides” (p. 1501) and the negative side of SNS usage, such as distraction, must also
be considered and reviewed.
In the reporting of their findings, many of the researchers who reported neutral results
often suggested developing similar studies, but with more scrutinizing criteria, to determine if
there is in fact a definitive impact of social networking sites on student engagement and/or
achievement.
Summary of Findings
Summary
This review reflected upon the research question “Does online social networking have an
impact on student engagement and achievement?” As a technology online social networking is
relatively new, being developed as recently as 2004 (Ellison et al., 2007). It has quickly grown
in popularity with students (Hargittai, 2008; Key Facts, 2012; Smith & Caruso, 2010), and
educators are poised to take advantage of any teaching and learning opportunities offered by the
use of online social networking (Brady et al., 2010; Gewertz, 2007; Nemetz et al. 2010).
19
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Throughout this review the research studies have focused on older secondary-aged
students as well as University students, and the term online social networking sites referred to
Facebook-style sites. Student achievement basically referred to an improvement in learning that
develops the individual and his or her ability to contribute to society (Brownlie & Renihan,
2003), and the close association between student engagement (the time and effort students invest
in educational activities) (Kuh, 2009) and student achievement is clearly defined and supported.
The research findings were organized into three main categories: findings indicating a
positive impact of SNSs on student engagement and achievement; findings indicating a negative
impact; or findings indicating neutral results.
Research studies indicating a positive impact of social networking sites on student
engagement and achievement suggested that SNSs had the potential to increase student
engagement (Brady et al., 2010; Junco, 2011; Wise et al., 2011), and this increase in student
engagement could lead to improved student achievement (Brady et al., 2010; Helou &
Ab.Rahim, 2011; Hoffman, 2009), cognitive skills (Alloway & Alloway, 2012) and skill
development (Yu et al., 2010). The potential for positive educational impact was recognized and
reported in the curriculum areas of civic engagement (Beach & Doerr-Stevens, 2011), and
language learning (Mahadi and Ubaidullah, 2010). As well the potential for positive impacts
from using the SNS programs Twitter (Forkosh-Baruch, 2012) and Ning (Brady et al., 2010)
were reported.
20
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Review of the research indicated there were also negative impacts of online SNSs on
student engagement and achievement. Suggestions that grade point average could be negatively
affected by time on the SNS Facebook were reported (Junco, 2012; Kirschner and Karpinski,
2010). Academic performance in general was found to be negatively affected by time on social
networking sites (Jacobsen & Forste, 2011; Junco & Cotton, 2012; Paul et al., 2012). Research
also related SNSs as a distraction; taking students away from their academic studies which could
eventually lead to academic difficulties (Flad, 2010; Junco, 2012; Junco & Cotton, 2012; Madge
et al., 2009; Paul et al., 2012), and negatively affecting study habits (Ahmed et al., 201; Oye.
Helou, & AbRahim, 2012). As well, time and accessibility (Brady et al., 2010) and the limited
role the popular SNS Facebook has in promoting student engagement (Wise et al., 2011) were
identified as potential barriers to student engagement and achievement.
Some researchers also reported neutral or inconsistent findings in their studies. Reporting
that SNS usage was not significant enough to affect academic performance adversely (Ahmed &
Qazi, 2011b); that there was insufficient evidence to suggest that the SNS Ning impacted student
achievement (Hoffman, 2009); or that there was no connection between GPA of users and non-
users of Facebook (Kolek & Saunders, 2008); researchers made no conclusions on either the
positive or negative side of the question. Cautions about the negative side of SNS usage was
included with a positive report that SNS could lead to improvements in self-esteem leading to
future success (Yu et al., 2010). Flad (2010) stated that there was no conclusive connection
21
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
between SNSs and academic achievement, suggesting that reported negative influences due to
SNS use were not substantial enough to definitively conclude negative correlations.
Discussion and Implications for further research
Student engagement and achievement through online social networking sites has been the
focus of this review. It has been shown that student achievement is directly correlated with and
impacted by student engagement (Brady et al., 2010; Junco et al., 2011). Further to this,
participation on online SNSs was associated with increasing student engagement (Hoffman,
2009; Junco, 2011; Martin & Dowson, 2009; Wise et al., 2011). However, while it has been
reported that SNSs can improve engagement and thereby student achievement, there was more
conclusive evidence relating to improved engagement, and less evidence of actual increases in
student achievement.
Conclusions drawn from the body of research analyzed lean towards indicating a negative
or neutral correlation between online social networking sites and their impact on student
achievement. While SNSs certainly engage students, this engagement does not necessarily lead
to student achievement. Essentially, it was reported that the Internet itself may cause students to
experience academic difficulties (Kubey et al., 2001), and social networking sites specifically
were said to be negatively correlated with GPA (Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010) and were
negatively associated with grades (Jacobsen & Forste, 2011). However, the studies which
reported a negative impact made the association between the distractions caused by SNSs and the
time taken away from academic studies (Ahmed et al., 2011; Jacobsen & Forste, 2011; Junko &
22
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Cotten, 2012; Madge et al., 2009). The detrimental effect of time on academic studies indicates
that students are using social networking for social reasons rather than educational reasons.
Despite the reported potential of online social networking sites in education, opening/viewing of
sites will often lead to distractive behavior, updating status, chatting, checking photos, etc.
(Junco, 2012) rather than attending to the preferred academic behavior.
As previously noted, however, there were some encouraging correlations reported. In
general, students themselves reported SNSs having a positive impact on their academic
performance (Brady et al., 2010; Helou & Ab.Rahim, 2011). The potential for social networking
sites having a positive impact is evident in the literature, with the collaborative (Beach & Doerr-
Stevens, 2011; Hoffman, 2009) and networking potential of SNS tools such a Twitter (Baruch &
Hershkovitz, 2012). The potential for the very popular social networking sites bodes well for
teachers interested in exploiting this technology for educational gain in the classroom,
particularly in the areas such as networked blogs, communication with faculty, and academic
discussions (Oye, Helou, & AbRahim, 2012).
While it was possible to find research that definitively supported positive or negative
correlations on the impact of SNSs on student achievement, the direct contribution of
participation in online social networking sites to student achievement remains to be proven
(Hoffman, 2009). Since reports also point to results in which there was no direct impact on or
correlation between SNSs on student achievement, either as indicated by students themselves
(Ahmed & Qazi, 2011b) or through objective research (Hoffman, 2009; Kolek & Saunders,
23
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
2008), it is clear that more research in this area is warranted. Further research should include
both objective and subjective academic impairment outcomes (Ahmed & Qazi, 2011b) in order
to gain a more clear-cut understanding of the academic impacts of online social networks. It is
important to note that in many studies, academic assessment is addressed by way of self-
reporting by students and faculty. While this data gives an overview of impressions by the
subjects, a more valid result may be obtained by looking at quantitative data such as changes in
grade point average. This implication for future research is echoed by Greenhow and Robelia
(2009) when they state in their conclusion “Future research needs to look more closely at student
practices in online environments, and we must go beyond grades and GPA to include different
forms of assessment” (p. 1155). Suggestions were also made for further investigation into the
types of online social networking sites that will enhance learning, as well as matching these sites
to the appropriate types of courses and applications (Paul et al., 2012). It is also interesting to
note that many of the studies reporting on the impact of SNSs on students chose Facebook as the
SNS on which to conduct their research, evidence of the extreme popularity of this site. It may
do well for researchers to focus on some of the other popular sites such as MySpace or Twitter,
or more educationally orientated sites such as Elgg or Ning.
Despite inconclusive or neutral attempts to determine the impact of social networking
sites on student performance, there is a general agreement that there are a myriad of educational
benefits to be derived from SNSs. Researchers indicate that SNSs provide a viable alternative
for educators, that training and support should be provided (Brady et al.2010), and that the
24
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
advantages of SNSs should be monitored and encouraged by students, teachers, and parents
alike, to enhance the educational performance of students (Ahmed et al., 2011).
Although Hoffman’s (2009) study was based on distance learning and SNSs, the
importance of research on the general educational impact social networking sites have on student
engagement and achievement in general can be applied to her statement “when technology
supports an affirmative, constructivist learning environment and contributes to successful
pedagogical strategies without distracting from essential objectives for development of
knowledge and skills, the result of formative evaluation of social networking potentials for
distance learning is positive” (p. 98). Social networking sites have been shown to have the
potential to improve knowledge and skills, and it is up to educators and curriculum developers to
ensure it supports an affirmative, constructivist learning environment.
It is clear that online social networking sites are here to stay and students are and will
continue to spend time on them. With knowledge that there may be negative associations
between SNSs, but that researchers are excited about the potential of SNSs, educators developing
curriculum connections with social networking sites should be able to observe positive impacts
of social networking sites on student engagement and achievement.
In conclusion, researchers provided evidence that student use of online social networking
sites has both positive and negative features. The research findings that social networks such as
Facebook provide a distraction that takes time away from academic pursuits is no surprise to this
writer (as a student and a parent), but the positive reports of enhanced engagement through the
use of SNSs is something that educators will have to explore. In this age of 24/7 online 25
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
connectivity, any aspect of technology which engages students should be fully explored for
possible inclusion in the curriculum, and potential increases in student achievement.
26
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
References
Ahmed, I. & Qazi, T. (2011a). A look out for academic impacts of social networking sites (SNSs): A student based perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 5(12), 5022-5031. Retrieved from www. Academicjournals.org/AJBM.
Ahmed, I. & Qazi, T. (2011b). Decifering the social costs of social networking sites (SNSs) for university students. African Journal of Business Management, 5(14), 5664-5674.retrieved from www. Academicjournals.org/AJBM.
Ahmed, I., Amir, M., Qazi, T. & Jabeen, S. (2011). An investigation of SNS usage and its impact on studying habits and academic performance of university students. Research Journal of International Studies, 21, 145-158.
Ahn, J. (2011). The influence of social networking sites on high school students' social and academic development. Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 71(9). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2011-99050-075&site=ehost-live&scope=site. (2011-99050-075)
Akyildz, M. & Argan, M. (2010). Using online social networking: Students’ purposes of Facebook usage at the University of Turkey. Journal of Technology Research, 3.
Alloway, T., & Alloway, R. (2012). The impact of engagement with social networking sites (SNSs) on cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1748-1754.
Andrews, L. & Drennan, J. (2009). Students’ perceptions, experiences and beliefs about Facebook in subjects at an Australian university. In: Proceedings of Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, 2009, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from QUT Digital Repository: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
Beach, R., & Doerr-Stevens, C. (2011). Using social networking for online role-plays to develop students' argumentative strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 165-181. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
27
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ943239&site=ehost-live&scope=site; http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=74788460TL43M271
Boyd, d., & Ellison, N. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Brady, K., Holcomb, L., & Smith, B. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 151-170. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ938842&site=ehost-live&scope=site; http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/9.2.4.pdf
Brownlie, F., & Renihan, F. (2003). Enhanced learning: Report of the student achievement task force. As presented to the Minister of Education, British Columbia, Canada, 2003. Retrieved from http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/taskforce/achieve_task_rep.pdf
Calvi, L., Cassella, M., & Nuijten, K. (2010). Enhancing users’ experience: A content analysis of 12 university libraries’ Facebook profiles. In ELPUB 2010 International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Helsinki (Iceland), 16-18 June. 258-269. Retrieved from https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10227/599/18calvi_cassella_nuijten.pdf?seq uence=56
Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2012). A case study of Israeli higher-education institutes sharing scholarly information with the community via social networks. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 58-68. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ947868&site=ehost-live&scope=site; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.003
Flad, K. (2010). The influence of social networking participation on student academic performance across gender lines. Counselor Education Master’s Thesis. Paper 31. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/edc_theses/31
Gewertz, C. (2007). Teenagers’ social networking found to have educational benefits in poll. Education week, 27 (1).
28
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new illiteracies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1130-1161. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01484.x
Griffith, S. & Liyanage. L. (2008). An introduction to the potential of social networking sites in education. Proceedings of the Emerging Technologies Conference, University of Wollongong, 18-21. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/etc08/9
Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2010). The use of online social networking for higher education from an activity theory perspective. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems Proceedings. Paper 135.Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2010/135
Hargittai, E. (2008). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276-297. Doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
Helou, A. & Ab. Rahim, N. (2011). The influence of social networking sites on students’ academic performance in Malaysia. International Conference on Internet Studies, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia. September 8, 2010. Retrieved from http://utech.academia.edu/shanaleebrown/Papers/1119387/THE_INFLUENCE_OF_SOCIAL_NETWORKING_SITES_ON_STUDENTSACADEMIC_PERFORMANCE_IN_MALAYSIA
Hoffman, E. (2009). Evaluating social networking tools for distance learning. Presented at TCC 2009 Proceedings, Retrieved from http://etec.hawaii.edu/proceedings/2009/hoffman.pdf.
Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 275-280. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0135
Junco, R. (2011). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers and Education, 58, 162-171. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004
Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 187-198.
29
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Junco, R. & Cotton, S. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers and Education, 59, 505-514. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Key Facts (2012). In Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22
Kirschner, P., & Karpinski, A. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
Kolek, E., & Saunders, D. (2008). Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles. NASPA Journal of student Affairs research and Practice, 54(1), 1-25. Retrieved from http://journals.naspa.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?context=jsarp&article=1905&date=&mt=MTM0MTM5OTI1Mg==&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fjournals.naspa.org%2Fjsarp%2Fvol45%2Fiss1%2Fart2%2F&access_ok_form=Continue
Kubey, R., Lavin, M., and Barrows, J. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication, 366-382.
Kuh, G. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0099
Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socializing and talking to friends about work than actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923606.
Mahadi, N., & Ubaidullah, N. (2010). Social networking sites: Opportunities for language teachers. The International Journal of Learning. 6, 313-323. Retrieved from http://www.Learning-Journal.com, ISSN 1447-9494
Martin, A. & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327-365.doi: 10.3102/0034654308325583
30
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M., 2008. The three p’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
Merchant, G. (2012). Unraveling the social network: Theory and research. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(1), 4-19. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ955170&site=ehost-live&scope=site; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.567992
Munoz, C. & Towner, T. (2009). Opening Facebook: How to use facebook in the college classroom. Presentation prepared for the Society for Information Technology and teacher Education conference, Charleston, S.C.
Nemetz, P., Aiken, K., Cooney, V., & Pascal, V. (2012). Should faculty use social networks to engage with students? Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 20(1), 19-28.
Oye, N., Helou, A., & Ad.Rahim, N. (2012). Model of perceived influence of academic performance using social networking. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 2(2), 24-29.
Paul, J., Baker, H., & Cochran, J. (2012). Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, In Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.016
Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneider, C. (2010). The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 159-174. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00347.x
Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students' education-related use of "facebook". Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157-174. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ856841&site=ehost-live&scope=site; http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/17439880902923622
Smith, S., & Caruso, J., (2010). Key findings: The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010. Educause: Centre for Applied Research, 2010. Retrieved from http://anitacrawley.net/Resources/Reports/ECAR%20study%20highlights.pdf
31
SNSs and Student Engagement and Achievement
Wise, L., Skues, J., & Williams, B. (2011). Facebook in higher education promoted social but not academic agents. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011, 1332-1342. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs/Wise-full.pdf
Yu, a., Tian, S., Vogel, D., & Kwok, R. (2010). Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers and Education, 55, 1494-1503.
Zhao, C. & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher education, 45(2), 115-138. doi 0361-0365/04/0300-0115/0
32