impacts of mis - a case study
TRANSCRIPT
State of Information Technology in Demo Marketing Firm
Elijah Clark
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to gain an analysis and evaluate the organization's key management
information system initiatives. Drawing from a series of interviews with current managers of
Demo Marketing Firm, The state of information technology within the marketing and branding
firm have been assessed. The key element of this paper is the identification and framing of the
organizational problems that relate to management information systems, knowledge
management, competitive advantage, and outsourcing. This research leads to identifying
problems and possible solutions to the problems identified. The knowledge gained from this
paper will present benefits and disadvantages of various approaches to the problems.
2
State of Information Technology in Demo Marketing Firm
Demo Marketing Firm (DMF) is a company that offers design and marketing services for
its customers. The organization has a desire to build its marketing and brand awareness, which it
believes will increase sales. Brand building will involve restructuring of DMF's brand marketing
and rebranding its online presence. Similar to most companies, DMF uses management
information systems (MIS) on a daily basis (Haag & Cummings, 2008). MIS allows
organizations to plan, develop, and manage information technology (IT) (Haag & Cummings,
2008). In addition, knowledge management (KM) can accelerate MIS and IT if properly
implemented (Mohamed, Stankosky & Murray, 2006). IT gives organizations the ability to
obtain information through technology such as computers, cell phone, and the Internet (Haag &
Cummings, 2008). DMF believes that within its industry, technology is not optional if its
organization desires to remain relevant and competitive. Outsourcing organizational IT is a
growing need and desire for businesses (Gottschalk & Solli-Sæther, 2005). Along with
outsourcing, DMF uses the Internet commerce of business to business (B2B) and business to
consumer (B2C) to sell services uniquely to its customers. B2B refers to selling services to other
businesses, and B2C refers to selling to the end user (Haag & Cummings, 2008).
Management Information Systems
MIS provides organizations and their managers with the tools necessary to effectively
manage departments within the organization (Haag & Cummings, 2008). MIS tools may include
decision making software, information databases, and programmable applications. MIS
managers have the responsibility to monitor information and technology systems and develop
solutions for items that hinder workflow within the organization that involves the use of
3
technology (Haag & Cummings, 2008). DMF has many tools to monitor its information systems.
However, it rarely uses these systems considering it does not adequately monitor its
organizational success. DMF does monitor its online traffic as well as its phone calls. However,
the third party systems such as Google platform tools and Call Fire digital phone service controls
these systems. Google gives DMF the ability to track its online traffic, such as how many people
visit the website, which pages they visit, how long they remain on the website or webpage, and
details about the user such as their location, operating system, and browser. Call Fire allows for
the tracking of phone calls, which include the customer's phone number, length of call, and a
recording of the phone call that DMF uses to enhance customer support.
Information Technology
Over the years, technology has always been important to DMF. Only recently, have DMF
customers become so involved with technology. The customers' knowledge and understanding of
technology has caused DMF to expand its own knowledge and present data and reporting to
customers using technology and software based systems. With the use of computers, faster
Internet, and mobile devices, consumers now desire access to information and can monitor their
success without the need of DMF putting together customized reports. For instance, if DMF had
a customer that purchased search engine optimization and desired DMF to place them first on the
search engine page for a particular keyword, previously that customer would receive the
information from DMF or notice the difference in sales. Now, however, customers can go and
seek the information themselves by using similar tools that DMF offers or by setting up alerts
whenever their Google rank lowers. Because of the consumer utilization and knowledge of
4
technology, DMF has to stay current with technology and have many more answers for a more
interested and technology aware user base.
The state of IT within DMF's organization is acceptable, but not up to the standards of its
competition. DMF has a good use of technology implemented within its organization, but there
are many more tools in which DMF could use to help them aim better at marketing its brand
versus only tracking and online monitoring. DMF believes that it has a good amount of IT
available to them. However, its managers believe that there may be better tools that can assist
with their daily task and minimize their workload. With technology changing so often, it is
difficult to know what tools are available and of those tools, what may be most effective. In
addition, by implementing more technology, there would be the need for learning the new tools
and systems.
DMF has been on the negative end of many different problems involving IT. One of
those problems included weekly emails of reports not sent to their customers on the scheduled
Monday. The results of this problem generated backlash from customers requesting the reports
they rely on to view their data for the previous week. To resolve the weekly report issue, which
was triggered by the third party that provided the reports, DMF had to work with the third party
provider to get manual reports pulled and sent to the customers the following day. This problem
caused DMF a full days worth of work managing the customers and working with the third party.
In addition, because it cost time, likewise, it cost DMF money. Though the third party provider
did offer a discount on services, it did not make up for the loyalty lost by the customer. This
problem creates a concern with why outsourcing services to third party vendors can complicate
work because of lack of status information.
5
When it comes to issues with IT systems within DMF, solving problems involves DMF
becoming more involved with its IT systems in which it uses (Haag & Cummings, 2008). If these
services or platforms were in-house, DMF could have better control over the outcome and
provide realistic expectations to its customers (Haag & Cummings, 2008). In addition, DMF
should have a backup plan to restore confidence of its customers and potentially offer them a
discount for the interruption.
Competition
DMF believes that its ethics and transparency are what sets it apart from its competitors.
Ethics are guidelines that help produce positive behaviors according to moral concepts and
judgments (Chekwa, Ouhirra, Thomas, & Chukwuanu, 2014; Haag & Cummings, 2008). In
addition, ethics is a matter of interpretation (Haag & Cummings, 2008). DMF managers agree
that what uniquely defines them from their competitors is that they are transparent with their
services and results. DMF has a goal and desire of allowing its customers to see all of the success
and failures regarding their projects concerning marketing. With the use of online technology
through marketing and reporting, customers can monitor the progress of DMF and their
campaigns. This method allows DMF to be transparent and causes less confusion for the
customers.
A disadvantage of being transparent is that customers often do not agree with what they
see. Being too transparent allows the customers to see results and data that may hinder DMF's
reputation and reliability. With DMF relying heavily on third party technology and platforms to
show success, if that technology fails, or if DMF fails to achieve high ranks or scores based on
these third party services, the customer can see this information and will often complain to DMF
6
about the adverse effects and results. It could be beneficial to DMF if they only showed
customers the good information and kept the negative data for in house technicians to resolve. In
addition, DMF could have the information available, but make it more complex for the customer
to view. Currently, DMF sends all information to customers on a weekly basis to their email
inbox. In addition, they allow customers to login to DMF's online platform to view details of the
data. This setup is very different from its competitors, and it makes DMF unique. However, the
competition's method has proven better success and clients of the competition are satisfied.
Furthermore, the general complaints that DMF receives from its customers are information
regarding the negative data DMF is handing over to the customer.
DMF believes that its practice of giving customers full control of the methods used to
generate success for their clients is a successful unique opposition. DMF gives their customers
full access to files, data, and allows them to adjust campaigns that DMF creates and customizes
for them. This however, has allowed DMF's customers to achieve success, and then take their
success either to a competing company at a lower value or use the information to manage their
own campaigns. The end result has been that because of DMF's transparency, customers can
achieve success with DMF and then cancel their services without damaging their marketing,
reputation, or seeing any decrease in sales. Considering DMF generates its revenue from
subscription based customers, and because DMF desires to make each of its customers a long-
term customer, this method of being transparent has and will likely continue causing the
organization losses in income and user loyalty. Unfortunately, while transparency is what
customer’s desire, it has not proven successful for DMF. DMF could produce the same or better
quality services for its customers if it focuses on its overall cost leadership (Haag & Cummings,
7
2008). DMF can offer its knowledge and experience to its customers through strategic marketing
plans (Bhatt & Grover, 2005). To gain new customers, DMF could provide products and services
that are unique to its industry and possibly not be so transparent (Carr, 2003; Haag & Cummings,
2008).
Outsourcing
DMF outsources most of the services it offers to its customers. The reason for this is that
it allows them to manage their customers and increase sales to gain new customers. In addition,
DMF outsources because of the financial burden it would be to hire skilled workers. An
organization outsources when it delegates portions of its workload to third party vendors (Haag
& Cummings, 2008). DMF believes that its current business structure is not in the best possible
condition for it to keep all task and projects in-house, or hire the best workers for the task. With
the skills needed and the low cost of its services, it would be nearly impossible to place skilled
individuals under a deserving salary. In addition, there would be the cost of the needed
technology, training, and worker benefits. By outsourcing, the outsourced agents are responsible
for their work benefits, and technology used to achieve results. Outsourcing has many benefits
that allow organizations to cut cost, save time, and use knowledge and resources outside of their
ability (Gottschalk & Solli-Sæther, 2005; Haag & Cummings, 2008; Tafti, 2005).
While outsourcing does save time and helps to lower expenses, it does have its
disadvantages for DMF. DMF currently does not have reliability from its outsourced agents, and
no agent is under any type of contract with the organization. Unfortunately, because of this, the
outsourced agents may take a leave of absence, quit, or simply not complete task for DMF at
their discretion. Outsourcing causes many problems for DMF considering their customer base
8
has high expectations and often need quick responses to problems that arise. Problems include
merely needing to change a misspelled word on a website, adjusting marketing campaigns, or
editing a graphic. While the adjustments are minute and should only take a few minutes to
complete, it often takes days because the outsourced agent may have task ahead of DMF.
Outsourcing helps DMF offer additional services and acquire leading-edge technology
(Gottschalk & Solli-Sæther, 2005; Haag & Cummings, 2008; Tafti, 2005). Considering DMF
does not implement the changes in-house, keeping cost down is crucial for the sake of the
customer or the finances of DMF. If the cost is too high and unexpected, DMF has to invoice the
customer for the cost. The problem with this is that this method cripples DMF from being able to
give reliable upfront cost to its customers and it will likely mean that the customer receives
multiple invoices based on the needed adjustments. This method causes confusion and frustration
for the customers, and creates distrust.
Business Model
DMF started its business by marketing and selling its services directly to the consumer.
Because of the involvement needed for completing the task, marketing to B2C became time
consuming and did not pay well because of the lowered prices based on consumers' needs, which
were relatively simple. DMF was able to achieve success by moving its structure to focus on
selling to businesses. B2B allows DMF to generate higher earnings because of the bigger needs
and budgets that businesses offered. Focusing on B2B gave DMF the opportunity it needed by
focusing on higher quality and not a quantity of clients. The fewer customers allowed DMF to
focus its attention on those customers. A disadvantage of this type of quality over quantity client
list is that if a B2B customer discontinued its services with DMF, it could damage the companies
9
finances because of the tremendous cost the business would be taking elsewhere. With B2C, a
customer could leave DMF with minimum damage to its finances. When dealing with B2B and
B2C processes, customer satisfaction is paramount to success (Duffy & Dale, 2002).
Knowledge Management
KM is an important strategy that DMF can utilize to help facilitate IT (Chong, Chan, Goh
& Tiwari, 2013). If DMF implements KM and focuses on creating, understanding, managing,
and generating value for its brand, it would likely achieve organizational success (McIver, C.
Lengnick-Hall, M. Lengnick-Hall & Ramachandran, 2013). Currently, DMF lacks knowledge of
its brand, and because of this, they have not had great success with online marketing (McIver et
al., 2013). DMF could work together with its outsourced agents to build knowledge for
understanding its own brand. With these many streams of ideas and innovation, DMF can expand
its knowledge base and generate customer interested, loyalty, and sales (Garstenauer, Blackburn
& Olson, 2014). KM has many benefits, and DMF can use these benefits to improve its
productivity by implementing more KM intangible systems such as databases (Yilmaz, 2007).
With the appropriate technology, DMF can revolutionize its KM objectives (Mohamed,
Stankosky & Murray, 2006). KM can be implemented into the structure of DMF if the
organization can find focused KM activities and incentives that will influence knowledge sharing
(McIver et al., 2013). If DMF can discover and implement what customers want from their
organization and the industry, they should be able to achieve a competitive advantage (McIver et
al., 2013).
10
Conclusion
MIS allows organizations to plan, develop, and manage IT (Haag & Cummings, 2008). If
DMF focuses on understanding the benefits of KM, it could achieve its marketing goals
(Mohamed, Stankosky & Murray, 2006). In today's knowledge economy, having a competitive
advantage is paramount to organizational success (McIver et al., 2013). By finding and
understanding the points in which it operates, DMF can effectively identify the most efficient
business exchanges and structure (Cullen & Webster, 2007). Creating new and unique services
could cost DMF additional marketing and management cost (Subramani & Walden, 2001).
However, considering DMF is a technology driven company, aligning additional new services to
their current structure should be easy to implement (Subramani & Walden, 2001). DMF
understands that, in order to create a positive experience, they must have and generate a positive
online presence integrated into IT systems (Duffy & Dale, 2002). DMF can become more
productive with the use of IT, if it is carefully, cautiously, and structurally introduced
(Mohamed, Stankosky & Murray, 2006). To help DMF find the proper market for its business, it
could use a marketing mix, which are tools and techniques that help search and monitor different
marketing campaigns through unique testing (Cullen & Webster, 2007; Haag & Cummings,
2008).
11
References
Bhatt, G., & Grover, V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in
competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 22(2). Retrieved from http://www.jmis-web.org/
Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review, 81(5). Retrieved from
http://www.hbr.org
Chekwa, C., Ouhirra, L., Thomas, E., & Chukwuanu, M. (2014). An examination of the effects
of leadership on business ethics: empirical study. International Journal Of Business &
Public Administration, 11(1), 48-65. Retrieved from http://www.iabpad.com/
Chong, A. Y., Chan, F. T., Goh, M., & Tiwari, M. (2013). Do interorganisational relationships
and knowledge-management practices enhance collaborative commerce adoption?.
International Journal Of Production Research, 51(7), 2006-2018.
doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.701776
Cullen, A. J., & Webster, M. (2007). A model of B2B e-commerce, based on connectivity and
purpose. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(2), 205-225.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570710720621
G. Duffy, & B.G. Dale, (2002),"E-commerce processes: a study of criticality", Industrial
Management & Data Systems, Vol. 102 Iss 8 pp. 432 - 441.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570210445862
Garstenauer, A., Blackburn, T., & Olson, B. (2014). A KM Based Approach to Quality
Management for Large Manufacturing Organizations. Engineering Management Journal,
26(4), 47-58.
12
Gottschalk, P., & Solli-Sæther, H. (2005). Critical success factors from IT outsourcing theories:
An empirical study. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 105(5), 685-702.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570510606941
Haag, S., & Cummings, M. (2008). Management information systems for the information age
(Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin
McIver, D., Lengnick-Hall, C., Lengnick-Hall, M., & Ramachandran, I. (2013). Understanding
work and KM from a knowledge-in-practice perspective. Academy of Management
Review, 38(4), 597–620. Retrieved from http://amr.aom.org
Mohamed, M., Stankosky, M., & Murray, A. (2006). KM and information technology: Can they
work in perfect harmony? Journal of KM, 10(3), 103-116.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270610670885
Subramani, M., & Walden, E. (2001). The impact of e-commerce announcements on the market
value of firms. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 135-154. Retrieved from
http://informas.org
Tafti, M. H. A. (2005). Risks factors associated with offshore IT outsourcing. Industrial
Management + Data Systems, 105(5), 549-560.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570510599940
Yilmaz, Y. (2007). Pre-analysis process for KM. VINE, 37(1), 74.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03055720710742052
13