implementation session rt 243 – enhancing innovation in the epc industry paul chinowsky,...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Implementation SessionRT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry
Paul Chinowsky, University of ColoradoModerator
![Page 2: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Panel• Paul Chinowsky – University of Colorado• Mike Toole – Bucknell University• Howard Irwin – AMEC• Cathy Myers – CH2MHill• Garry King – WorleyParsons
Other Team MembersMauricio Rodriquez – Smithsonian Institution
Matt Hallowell – University of Colorado
John Strickland – CH2M Hill
![Page 3: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Agenda
• Review of Phase I – Paul • Objectives of Phase II – Validate the IMM – Mike• Maturity Model Findings - Mike• Case Studies
– Southland – Howard– Ch2M-Hill – Cathy
• Putting This Into Action – Garry• Conclusion - Paul
![Page 4: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Learning Objectives
• Understand Innovation Maturity Model• Understand How to Implement in Your
Organization• Understand The Need to Change Innovation
Perspectives
![Page 5: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Phase I Objectives
• Determine Innovation Drivers
• Determine Innovation Support Components
• Focus on Enhancing Innovation
After 200 data points and literature review -
![Page 6: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
8 Key Enablers
• Leadership• Learning• Processes• Risk Perspective• Culture• Collaboration• Customer Focus• Resources
Innovation Maturity Model
![Page 7: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Innovation Maturity Model
Q18. Innovation-related activities can be pursued during normal working hours. Work days are not so full that innovation-related activities only occur outside normal working hours.
1=strongly disagree2=slightly disagree3=I am neutral4=slightly agree5=strongly agree.
Averagemax
Score Difference WeightingImprovement Potential
2.87 5 2.13 4.00 8.53
Resources should not be so tightly allocated that there is no time available for activities that may not be tied directly to daily tasks. …
![Page 8: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Innovation Maturity Model
Innovation Completion Scores Raw Score Achievement %
Culture 120.70 77%Resources 118.70 69%Risk 123.33 70%Customer 63.44 70%Learning 124.16 80%Collaboration 95.31 75%Leadership 84.97 71%Processes 71.33 71%
![Page 9: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Implementation SessionRT 243 – Phase II Objectives and Findings
Mike Toole – Bucknell University
![Page 10: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Objective 1: Validate IMM Evaluation Tool
• Confirm content and focus
• Improve statement wording
• Add demographic questions
• Convert Excel to Web tool
![Page 11: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Objective 2: Improve IMM Process
• Discussions with client regarding organizational goals, client IMM sample
• Analysis of client IMM evaluation data
• Selection of IMM recommendations to be implemented
• Monitoring of implementation
![Page 12: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Objective 3: Document Case Studies
• Goal: encourage IMM adoption by CII members
– Reduce uncertainty about tool and process
– Share pilot client lessons learned
• Commitment to confidentiality
• Case studies to be included in research report
![Page 13: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
IMM Case Studies Background• 6 volunteer organizations
– Southland Industries– WorleyParsons– CH2M Hill– Fluor– CSA– US Army Corps of Engineers
• Web based• Sample chosen by organization
Sample size varied
![Page 14: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Case Study Comparison
![Page 15: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Barrier ComparisonCase Study 1 Case Study 2 Case Study 3
Non-Billable Hours Non-Billable Hours
Non-Billable Hours
Leadership Fostering Innovation
Leadership Fostering Innovation
Funding From Corporate
Funding From Corporate
Funding From Corporate
Work Days Too Full
Work Days Too Full
Work Days Too Full
Innovation Incentives
Innovation Incentives
Multi-Disciplinary Teams Focus on Innovation
Projects Focus onthe Contract
Risk-Taking is Recognized as Part of Innovation
Risk-Taking is Recognized as Part of Innovation
Leadership ToleratesSome Failure
![Page 16: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary of Findings
• IMM is a valuable evaluation tool
• Results very similar within pilot clients and similar to survey data
• Implementation of recommendations is critical
![Page 17: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Implementation SessionRT 243 – Case Study: Southland Industries
Howard Irwin - AMEC
![Page 18: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Case Study: Southland
Address two pertinent topics:• Can innovation maturity be measured?
– Road test the survey and its output
• Do the recommendations work?– Test the process of assigning recommendations based
on the survey– Test the validity of the recommendations
![Page 19: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Case Study: Southland
Case Study Process:1. Maturity Model Survey - Round 1
2. Benchmarking Analysis
3. Recommendations for Improvement
4. Implementation of Recommendations
5. Maturity Model Survey - Round 2
6. Improvement Analysis
![Page 20: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Maturity Model: Round 1
Question / Attribute IPQ60. Our organization has an established process for obtaining corporate
funds and resources to support innovation activities. 7.60Q22. Our organization has incentives and/or ways to indemnify a project
that is implementing an innovation. 7.24Q57. Our organization has a process for developing innovations before
implementing on projects to improve likelihood of success. 7.00Q61. Our organization has a process for ensuring innovation-related
learning from one project modifies behavior on subsequent projects. 7.00Q25. Our organization spreads innovation-related risk across multiple projects. 6.86Q23. Risk-taking is recognized as a necessary part of encouraging and
implementing new ideas. 6.19Q48. Our organization expects individuals to share ideas through formal forums. 6.17
![Page 21: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Maturity Model: Round 1
Question / Attribute IPQ60. Our organization has an established process for obtaining corporate
funds and resources to support innovation activities. 7.60Q22. Our organization has incentives and/or ways to indemnify a
project that is implementing an innovation. 7.24Q57. Our organization has a process for developing innovations before
implementing on projects to improve likelihood of success. 7.00Q61. Our organization has a process for ensuring innovation-related
learning from one project modifies behavior on subsequent projects. 7.00Q25. Our organization spreads innovation-related risk across multiple projects. 6.86Q23. Risk-taking is recognized as a necessary part of encouraging and
implementing new ideas. 6.19Q48. Our organization expects individuals to share ideas through formal forums. 6.17
![Page 22: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Recommendations
– Set aside a “pool” or “incentive pot” of funds for project innovations.
– Establish “contingency” limits (higher than normal) to be applied to projects to offset risks of trying innovations
Q22. Our organization has incentives and/or ways to indemnify a project that is implementing an innovation.
![Page 23: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Recommendations
– Assign the responsibility of “Learning Coordinator (LC)” to a COP
– Develop and implement a monthly knowledge letter sent by each LC
– Create a searchable library of innovations
Q61. Our organization has a process for ensuring innovation-related learning from one project modifies behavior on subsequent projects.
![Page 24: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Recommendations
– Establish Communities of Practice– Establish a Recognition System for
outstanding performance
Q48. Our organization expects individuals to share ideas through formal forums.
![Page 25: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Southland – Case Study Highlights
• IMM provided targeted areas to address.• Recommendations fit well into Southland’s
continuous improvement program• However, base recommendations needed to
be adjusted to fit the organization• Second Round survey showed marked
improvements in the three areas addressed
![Page 26: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Implementation SessionRT 243 – Case Study: CH2M HILLElectronics & Advanced Technology
Cathy Myers– CH2M Hill
![Page 27: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Background
• Electronics & Advanced Technology – Focus on Leading Edge Industrial Technologies
![Page 28: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Using the Maturity Model
• 51 Responses from 2 Groups– Recently Involved in Lean Initiative (Responsibility
Based Project Delivery)– Similar Project Not Using Lean Approach
• Formula for Finding Greatest Opportunity– (ideal score – actual score) x importance factor
![Page 29: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Maturity Model Mapping
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%Culture
Resources
Risk
Customer
Learning
Collaboration
Leadership
Processes
![Page 30: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Findings
• Generally Positive Perception• Areas of Strength
– Culture – Leadership
• Plenty of Room for Potential Improvement
![Page 31: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Biggest Opportunities
• Non-Billable Hours• Corporate Funding for Innovation• Leadership Investing in Innovation• Incentives and Project Indemnification• Sharing of Knowledge• Failure Tolerance• Risk Taking for Long-Term Advancement
![Page 32: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Path Forward
• Clear Connection to Lean Project Delivery Initiative • Incorporate Findings to Improve Learning • New Thinking on Risk Perspective
![Page 33: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Putting the Research to Work Garry King – WorleyParsons
![Page 34: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Changing The Game
• Recognize the Strategic Importance • Guide the Culture • Engage the Talent• Stimulate Collaboration and Learning• Create the Processes (transform ideas to action)• Change the Risk Perspective
![Page 35: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Syndicating vs. Isolating Risk
Some Industries Make Good Money By Taking Advantage of Multiple Iterations
![Page 36: Implementation Session RT 243 – Enhancing Innovation in the EPC Industry Paul Chinowsky, University of Colorado Moderator](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d6a5503460f94a49002/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Where Do I Start?
1. Measure your organization (IMM survey)
2. Analyze IMM results and recommendations
3. Select specific areas for improvement
4. Adjust and implement to fit your organization
5. Measure again to confirm effectiveness
6. Take a long term perspective